Future Expeditionary Armor Force Needs

Similar documents
REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

US Marine Corps Tactical Wheeled Vehicle Strategy Update Briefing to NDIA Tactical Wheeled Vehicle Conference 2 February 2009

A Perspective from the Corps. Col Mike Boyd, USMC HQMC/LPE 3 Dec 2003

ORGANIZATION AND FUNDAMENTALS

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 1

Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) and Marine Personnel Carrier (MPC): Background and Issues for Congress

INITIAL CAPABILITIES DOCUMENT (ICD) FOR MARINE CORPS ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES (MCEITS)

Expeditionary Force 21 Attributes

CD&I and CDD Organization Expeditionary Force 21 MEB CONOPS Combat and Tactical Vehicle Strategy & ACV Video Seabasing and Non-Standard Platforms

This block in the Interactive DA Framework is all about joint concepts. The primary reference document for joint operations concepts (or JOpsC) in

... from the air, land, and sea and in every clime and place!

Amphibious Landings in the 21 st Century

R Z SEP 17 FM CMC CDI MEXWID WASHINGTON DC TO RUJIAAA/COMMARFORCOM RUJIAAA/COMMARFORCOM G FOUR RUJIAAA/COMMARFORCOM G THREE G FIVE G SEVEN

The Marine Corps Operating Concept How an Expeditionary Force Operates in the 21 st Century

The Western UAS Symposium

Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory

J. L. Jones General, U.S. Marine Corps Commandant of the Marine Corps

Agenda. DoD as an Energy Consumer. Defense Energy Challenges. Adapting to a New Environment. DoD Operational Energy Strategy. Current Initiatives

Next Gen Armored Reconnaissance: ARV Introduction and Requirements. - Brief to Industry-

JCIDS: The New Language of Defense Planning, Programming and Acquisition

Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association Luncheon Feb 23, 2012

Engineering Operations

Littoral OpTech West Workshop

Chapter 1. Introduction

process since the beginning of the program and will continue that involvement throughout the life cycle of the program.

SEABASING AND SHIP-TO-OBJECTIVE MANEUVER: AN ANALYSIS OF THESE CONCEPTS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR THE JOINT FORCE COMMANDER

COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM

Re-Shaping Distributed Operations: The Tanking Dimension

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

1st Marine Expeditionary Brigade Public Affairs Office United States Marine Corps Camp Pendleton, Calif

Expeditionary Energy. David P. Karcher Director, Energy Systems SIAT, MCSC

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

OPNAVINST N9 16 Jun Subj: CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING STRATEGY

Marine Corps. Functional Concept for Marine Air. Ground Task Force Fires

The U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) is the nation s

AAN wargames would benefit from more realistic play of coalition operations. Coalition members could be given strategic goals and

Department of the Navy FY 2006/FY 2007 President s Budget. Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) and Marine Personnel Carrier (MPC): Background and Issues for Congress

Foreword. Gordon England Secretary of the Navy

The Coastal Systems Station Strategic Perspective

The 19th edition of the Army s capstone operational doctrine

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #152

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

Reinvigorating Squad Level Units for U.S. Marine Corps Dismounted Combat Capabilities

Assessing Technologies using Campaign Analysis and War Gaming: The Warfare Innovation Continuum at NPS

Shallow-Water Mine Countermeasure Capability for USMC Ground Reconnaissance Assets EWS Subject Area Warfighting

CAPT Heide Stefanyshyn-Piper

THE MAGTF AS AN OPERATIONAL MANEUVER ELEMENT IN SUSTAINED OPERATIONS ASHORE

Subj: MARINE CORPS POLICY ON ORGANIZING, TRAINING, AND EQUIPPING FOR OPERATIONS IN AN IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (IED) ENVIRONMENT

SIMULATION AS A MISSION PLANNING AND REHEARSAL TOOL. William M. Garrabrants

Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head

Chapter I SUBMUNITION UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE (UXO) HAZARDS

NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium

NDIA Munitions Executive Summit Sustaining Industrial Readiness

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) and Marine Personnel Carrier (MPC): Background and Issues for Congress

C4I System Solutions.

Overview of Expeditionary Power Systems Marine Corps Systems Command Warren Clare Joint Service Power Expo August 25, 2015

James T. Conway General, U.S. Marine Corps, Commandant of the Marine Corps

Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability

Conducting. Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation. in a. Distributive Environment

Winning in Close Combat Ground Forces in Multi-Domain Battle

Brief to National Defense Industrial Association

MCO B C March Subj: MARINE CORPS EXPEDITIONARY FORCE DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (EFDS)

Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle

Chapter 13 Air and Missile Defense THE AIR THREAT AND JOINT SYNERGY

Data Collection & Field Exercises: Lessons from History. John McCarthy

Joint Warfare System (JWARS)

FORCE XXI BATTLE COMMAND, BRIGADE AND BELOW (FBCB2)

Organization of Marine Corps Forces

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO)

STATEMENT GENERAL ROBERT B. NELLER COMMANDANT OF THE MARINE CORPS AS DELIVERED TO CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES

Future Force Capabilities

Where Have You Gone MTO? Captain Brian M. Bell CG #7 LTC D. Major

ASN (RDA) Chief Engineer

Section 7.5 PEO LS Program GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operations

MC Network Modernization Implementation Plan

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4

How Can the Army Improve Rapid-Reaction Capability?

Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV): Background and Issues for Congress

STATEMENT OF RADM ANTHONY L. WINNS DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE AND BGEN MARTIN POST ASSISTANT DEPUTY COMMANDANT

Beyond Phase II Conference RIF Overview

It s All about the Money!

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

MCWP Counterintelligence. U.S. Marine Corps. 5 September 2000 PCN

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Joint Automated Deep Operation Coordination System (JADOCS)

Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare and Strategic Sealift: Ways to Improve the Marines Expeditionary Capability

2009 ARMY MODERNIZATION WHITE PAPER ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT

VADM David C. Johnson. Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition April 4, 2017

Organization of Marine Corps Forces

navy strategy For AChIevIng InFormAtIon dominance navy strategy For AChIevIng InFormAtIon dominance Foreword

MR. BILL WILLIFORD Executive Director, Marine Corps Systems Command

10 August Space and Missile Defense Technology Development Panel AMRDEC Missile S&T. Mr. Jeffrey Langhout

Transcription:

Future Expeditionary Armor Force Needs Chris Yunker MEFFV JCIDS Team Lead Marine Corps Combat Development Command 703-432-4042 (MCSC) 703-784-4915 (MCCDC) Yunkerc@mcsc.usmc.mil Chris.Yunker@usmc.mil This presentation contains reference to the United States Government military capabilities that may not be authorized for release or sale. Mention of these capabilities in no way implies that the United States Government will release or consider release of them or any associated classified or unclassified information pertaining to them. 1

Overview Context for future armor force combat development Current combat development activities, Expeditionary Armored Forces (EAF) Functional Needs Analysis Future activities EAF Initial Capability Document 2

LPA Richmond NEF LPA OBJ A Charleston NEF OBJ C MCCDC, Concepts Littoral Penetration Area (LPA) Jersey Naval Expeditionary Force (NEF) OBJ B Context for Future Armor Programs Must evolve capabilities that support Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare concepts. - Operational Maneuver From the Sea, - Sustained Operations Ashore - Other Expeditionary Operations Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Continues the Corps transformation to the 21 st century battlefield EMW Concept Capstone warfighting concept for USMC OMFTS Concept Sea-basing the expeditionary force & extending the operational reach of the MAGTF Other Expeditionary Operations Relevance to the broad spectrum of operations Sustained Operations Ashore Operational concept for the MAGTF conducting land warfare in joint/coalition environment Operational Maneuver From The Sea OBJ A Decision Point Assembly Area Concepts Capability Needs Materiel Approach AAV Battalion LAR Battalion Tank Battalion Reponding to Over the Horizon launch for STOM Known and Documented Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (EFV) Must adjust for OMFTS, OEO and SOA Not fully known / Not documented TBD but evaluating FCS capabilities Must adjust for OMFTS, OEO and SOA Not fully known / Not documented TBD but evaluating FCS capabilities Timeframe IOC - 2009 / FOC - 2017 2015 2025 3

Assault Amphibian Battalion & Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle Employment Concept well defined, strong links with materiel requirements. Materiel Solution well defined, well along in acquisition. EFV Program is on the march to significantly increase the capabilities of the AAV Battalion. 4

Tank Battalion & LAR Battalion Future Capability Needs Developing Expeditionary Armored Forces Initial Capability Document. Examining refinement of armor concepts needed to support STOM Concept of Operations. Must analyze DOTMPLF solutions to improving the capabilities of the Tank and LAR Battalions. Evaluating FCS as an Alternative Material Approach, informed by collaboration with FCS and PM UA. Analysis needed to understand how best to increase the capabilities of the LAR and Tank Battalions. 5

Looking Back on MEFFV MAGTF Expeditionary Family of Fighting Vehicles A Nov 2001 Mission Need Statement initiated MEFFV planning, citing these deficiencies: LAV M-1 - more capable threat - survivability eroding - weapon system lethality - increasing O&S costs - declining RAMD & sustainability - size/weight logistics tail drive deployment constraints - high fuel & ammo consumption - may limit operational reach of MAGTF - needs of re-supply points 6

MEFFV & Navy Transformation* Transforming STOM Maneuver from sovereign sea-bases, not vulnerable land support bases Deep inland fire support Over-the-horizon sustainment Transformed Ship-to-Objective Maneuver envisions amphibious assaults in which both surface- and vertical-lift combined arms teams commence their attacks from over the horizon directly at their assigned objectives.... The MAGTF Expeditionary Family of Fighting Vehicles (MEFFVs) will provide a mobile, armored, direct fire, self-contained, combinedarms, multi-mission, and multi-role expeditionary family of fighting platforms capable of conducting rapid operational maneuver in varied terrain. Advanced Tilt-Rotor technology aircraft, such as MV-22, will accelerate the speed and range of delivery and survivability of troops, equipment, and supplies being delivered from the sea base. * Naval Transformation Roadmap (Jul 02) 7

MEFFV Alternative Concepts Study Initiated before new JCIDS process was signed. Purpose of Study: Develop a sound strategic foundation for future combat vehicle ORD refinement. Objectives: a) Determine the needed combat, combat support and combat service support capabilities of the future MAGTF conducting EMW. b) Isolate those not met by the EFV to determine capabilities in need of further development for the MAGTF Expeditionary Family of Fighting Vehicles. Result: Provided basis for Functional Area Analysis (strategy to task mapping) for the future armored forces of the MAGTF. 8

1. Examining concepts and capability needs of the expeditionary armored force to equip the future MAGTF. 2. Establishing a process to mitigate risk introduced by: a) Technology change b) Evolving operational concepts (USMC in particular, but also Joint) Current Activities Combat Development Focus JCIDS Process* Systems Integration Process 3. Establishing a team to integrate efforts of the combat developer and material developer to inform the Initial Capability and Capability Development Documents. *Joint Capability Integration and Development System Joint Program Planning Process 9

Expeditionary Armored Forces Functional Need Analysis Initiated Jul 04: in compliance with Joint Capability Integration and Development Systems Instruction, to analyze capability needs within the context of service and joint warfighting, to consider needed armor capabilities of the MAGTF in the next decade, to determine what capabilities are needed by the MAGTF to complement EFV capabilities. JCIDS Process 10

Expeditionary Armored Forces Why Assess the EAF? The Marine Corps has Title X responsibility to field expeditionary capabilities Today s Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF) provides expeditionary armored forces responding across the full range of military operations Currently fielded armor systems face the end of design service life in the next decade Marine Corps leadership Foresees the need to continue these capabilities into the future Seeks to augment current capabilities with enhancements to accomplish its Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare (EMW) operating concept Enhanced MAGTF expeditionary armored forces must Possess the ability to maneuver forces and systems to deliver effects despite the use of lethal enemy systems employed against them Retain the ability to conduct forcible entry operations from the sea The Naval Operating Concept for Joint Operations places a premium on the extension of operational maneuver, deployability, mobility, and flexibility, with maximum reliance on logistical support from the sea To ensure the future MAGTF s ability to perform mounted combat operations, the Marine Corps will conduct a Functional Area Analysis (FAA) and a Functional Needs Analysis (FNA) This analysis will lead to the identification of capability gaps for the to be state of expeditionary armored forces It will be conducted in the context of the Joint Force identifying service unique required capabilities and those Joint required capabilities Slide 1 JCIDS Process 11

EAF Functional Need Analysis Approach FAA Joint Concepts Threat & Environment Military Objectives Required Joint Capabilities Current & - Programmed Joint = Capabilities FNA Required Capability Gaps Attributes of Solutions to Gap MOE Joint Current Year Capabilities Joint Current Year Gaps Joint Required Capabilities Force App C2 Logistics BA Protection Net Centric Slide 2 JCIDS Process Exped Armor Forces Task List from Joint Mapping Force App C2 Logistics BA Protection Net Centric Logistics BA Protection Net Centric 2004 USMC + USA + Other Service Capabilities to meet Joint Required Capabilities Joint Programmed Capabilities Force App 2020 USMC + C2 USA + Other Service Capabilities to meet Joint Required Capabilities Force App C2 Logistics BA Protection Net Centric Force App C2 Logistics BA Protection Net Centric Gaps, Overlaps, Issues & Implications Joint Future Year Gaps Gaps, Overlaps, Issues & Implications Joint Solutions Force App C2 Logistics BA Protection Net Centric Attribute s & MOES 12

EAF Functional Need Analysis Strategy-to-Task Naval Transformation Roadmap Naval Power 21 Sea Power 21 Marine Corps Strategy 21 Sea Strike, Sea Shield, Sea Base NSS QDR Defense Strategy National Military Strategy Strategic Planning Guidance Transformation Planning Guidance (TPG) Joint Vision 2020 Joint Operations Concepts (JOpsC) Joint Operating Concepts (JOC) Joint Functional Concepts (JFC) Army Transformation Roadmap Army Modernization Plan FAA - Distills tasks, conditions and standards based on higher level documents including Joint & Service Task Lists. AF Strategic Planning Directive AF Transformational Flight Plan AF CONOPS Look across ROMO Crosswalks to Service Task Lists (UJTL, UNTL, AFMCL, AUTL) (Range Of Military Ops) Account for for Applicable Tasks Tasks Across Across Joint Joint & Service Concepts Slide 3 JCIDS Process 13

EAF Functional Need Analysis Analytical Construct Activities Functional Areas Net Centric Ops Command & Control Battlespace Awareness Force Application Focused Logistics Force Protection Deter/Engage Seize Initiative Decisive Operations Tasks Capabilities Conditions Standards Systems Linkages Gaps Transition War MOOTW w/force MOOTW w/o Force Operational Scenarios Slide 4 JCIDS Process Develop an an Analytical Construct 14

EAF Functional Need Analysis Identify Yours, Mine & Ours EAF Tasks Maneuver Fires C2 Logistics Intell Force Prot Tasks from MEFFV ACS USMC Unique Joint Task List Force App C2 Logistics BA Protection Net Centric Joint Exped Armor Forces Task List from Joint Mapping UA Tasks Maneuver Fires C2 Logistics Intell Force Prot US Army Unique FCS Armor Force Task List Slide 5 JCIDS Process 15

EAF Functional Need Analysis FNA Process JCIDS Process 16

EAF Functional Need Analysis Current & Future Programs JCIDS Process Identify current systems that meet need Identify service current and future programs that may meet need Research & describe Current USMC capabilities Programmed USMC capabilities Current other service capabilities Programmed other service capabilities Potential future technology solutions 17

EAF Functional Need Analysis Gaps Describe shortfalls, overlaps, problems & implications from Joint perspective Identify gaps between service current systems and the need based on conditions & standards from FAA Identify gaps between service future programs and the JCIDS Process need based on conditions & standards from FAA 18

EAF Functional Need Analysis Solutions Develop joint solutions identifying attributes and MOE JCIDS Process 19

Looking Forward Expeditionary Armored Force Initial Capability Document Analysis guided by Capability Enhancement Goals of the EMW Capability List: Strategic Agility, Operational Reach, Tactical Flexibility, Support and Sustainment, Joint and Multinational Enabling Capability needs correlated to the other programs within the Expeditionary Force Development Center through the EMW Capabilities List. Functional Solution Analysis after FNA in FY06. EAF Concept Decision in FY06/07. In 2005 will establish Systems Integration linkage between the MCCDC EFDC and PM UA on armored forces. Analysis Of Alternatives for Milestone A in FY 07/08. JCIDS Process Systems Integration Process Joint Program Planning Process 20