Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Similar documents
Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

U.S. Military Casualty Statistics: Operation New Dawn, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Freedom

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Iraq Casualties: U.S. Military Forces and Iraqi Civilians, Police, and Security Forces

NATO Ammunition Safety Group (AC/326) Overview with a Focus on Subgroup 5's Areas of Responsibilities

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Wildland Fire Assistance

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act: Background and Issues

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

NATO Common Funds Burdensharing: Background and Current Issues

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

How to Improve the Gender Balance Within the National Armed Forces

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

The first EHCC to be deployed to Afghanistan in support

Veterans Affairs: Gray Area Retirees Issues and Related Legislation

NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED Releasable to Afghanistan, Australia, Japan, Jordan, New Zealand and the United Arab Emirates. 15 November 2017 IMSM

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Defense Surplus Equipment Disposal: Background Information

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Iraqi Civilian, Police, and Security Forces Casualty Statistics

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

Force protection is a contentious issue. Who s Responsible? Understanding Force Protection. By THOMAS W. MURREY, JR.

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Report No. D April 9, Training Requirements for U.S. Ground Forces Deploying in Support of Operation Iraqi Freedom

Department of Defense Section 1207 Security and Stabilization Assistance: A Fact Sheet

The NATO Science for Peace and Security (SPS) Programme

Quarterly Monitor of the Canadian ICT Sector Third Quarter Covering the period July 1 September 30

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM

Report No. DODIG Department of Defense AUGUST 26, 2013

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Water Usage at Forward Operating Bases

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Incomplete Contract Files for Southwest Asia Task Orders on the Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support Contract

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Personnel. Staffing of the Agency's Secretariat. Report by the Director General

Report Documentation Page

Report Documentation Page

GAO. FEDERAL RECOVERY COORDINATION PROGRAM Enrollment, Staffing, and Care Coordination Pose Significant Challenges

ERASMUS+ current calls. By Dr. Saleh Shalaby

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

Forms of Environmental Education in the Armed Forces and their Impact on Creation of Proenvironmental

Military Health System Conference. Psychological Health Risk Adjusted Model for Staffing (PHRAMS)

Summary of the National Reports. of NATO Member and Partner Nations to the NATO Committee on Gender Perspectives

Report No. D February 22, Internal Controls over FY 2007 Army Adjusting Journal Vouchers

WikiLeaks Document Release

Veterans Benefits: Federal Employment Assistance

University of Wyoming End of Semester Fall 2013 Students by Country & Site

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

The Landscape of the DoD Civilian Workforce

Advance Notification of forthcoming Market Survey APMS

EUREKA and Eurostars: Instruments for international R&D cooperation

Update from the NATO EOD Working Group

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

Report No. DODIG December 5, TRICARE Managed Care Support Contractor Program Integrity Units Met Contract Requirements

National scholarship programme for foreign students, researchers and lecturers SCHOLARSHIP FOR STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION Guidelines 2018

Financial Management

National Continuity Policy: A Brief Overview

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

DETENTION OPERATIONS IN A COUNTERINSURGENCY

Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications: Update on DOD s Modernization

Transcription:

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians Susan G. Chesser Information Research Specialist April 6, 2011 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41084

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302 Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number 1. REPORT DATE 06 APR 2011 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2011 to 00-00-2011 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Congressional Research Service,The Library of Congress,101 Independence Avenue SE,Washington,DC,20540-7500 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a REPORT unclassified b ABSTRACT unclassified c THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 6 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Summary This report collects statistics from a variety of sources on casualties sustained during Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), which began on October 7, 2001, and is ongoing. OEF actions take place primarily in Afghanistan; however, OEF casualties also includes American casualties in Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Guantanamo Bay (Cuba), Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Jordan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, the Philippines, Seychelles, Sudan, Tajikistan, Turkey, and Yemen. Casualty data of U.S. military forces are compiled by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), as tallied from the agency s press releases. Also included are statistics on those wounded but not killed. Statistics may be revised as circumstances are investigated and as records are processed through the U.S. military s casualty system. More frequent updates are available at DOD s website at http://www.defenselink.mil/news/ under Casualty Update. A detailed casualty summary of U.S. military forces that includes data on deaths by cause, as well as statistics on soldiers wounded in action, is available at the following DOD website: http://siadapp.dmdc.osd.mil/personnel/casualty/castop.htm. NATO s International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) does not post casualty statistics of the military forces of partner countries on the ISAF website at http://www.isaf.nato.int/. ISAF press releases state that it is ISAF policy to defer to the relevant national authorities to provide notice of any fatality. For this reason, this report uses fatality data of coalition forces as compiled by CNN.com and posted online at http://www.cnn.com/specials/2004/oef.casualties/index.html. Reporting on casualties of Afghans did not begin until 2007, and a variety of entities now report the casualties of civilians and security forces members. The United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan (UNAMA) reports casualty data of Afghan civilians semiannually, and the U.S. Department of Defense occasionally includes civilian casualty figures within its reports on Afghanistan. The Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, http://www.aihrc.org.af/ 2010_eng/, and the Afghan Rights Monitor, http://www.arm.org.af/, are local watchdog organizations that periodically publish reports regarding civilian casualties. From July 2009 through April 2010, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) included statistics of casualties of members of the Afghan National Army and Afghan National Police in its quarterly reports to Congress. SIGAR has ceased this practice, and there is no other published compilation of these statistics. This report now derives casualty figures of Afghan soldiers and police from the press accounts of the Reuters Factbox: Security Developments in Afghanistan series and the Pajhwok Afghan News agency. Both services attribute their reported information to officials of the NATO-led ISAF or local Afghan officials. Pajhwok Afghan News frequently concludes its accounts with statements from representatives of the Taliban; however, these figures are not included in this report. Because the estimates of Afghan casualties contained in this report are based on varying time periods and have been created using different methodologies, readers should exercise caution when using them and should look to them as guideposts rather than as statements of fact. This report will be updated as needed. Congressional Research Service

T he following tables present data on U.S. military casualties in Operation Enduring Freedom, deaths of coalition partners in Afghanistan, and Afghan casualties, respectively. Table 1. Operation Enduring Freedom, U.S. Fatalities and Wounded (as of April 6, 2011, 10 a.m. EDT from October 7, 2001) Fatalities In and Around Afghanistan a Fatalities in Other Locations b Total Fatalities c Wounded in Action Hostile d 1,168 11 1,179 Non-Hostile e 249 88 337 Total 1,417 99 1,516 Total 10,855 Source: U.S. Department of Defense, http://www.defense.gov/news/casualty.pdf. a. Fatalities in and around Afghanistan includes casualties that occurred in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Uzbekistan. b. Other locations includes casualties that occurred in Guantanamo Bay (Cuba), Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Jordan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, the Philippines, Seychelles, Sudan, Tajikistan, Turkey, and Yemen. c. Fatalities include two Department of Defense civilian personnel. d. According to the Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, as amended through 31 August 2005, a hostile casualty is a victim of a terrorist activity or a casualty as the result of combat or attack by any force against U.S. forces, available at http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/dod_dictionary/. e. The above-named reference defines a nonhostile casualty as a casualty that is not directly attributable to hostile action or terrorist activity, such as casualties due to the elements, self-inflicted wounds, or combat fatigue. Table 2. American Casualties by Year through April 6, 2011 Year Total Deaths Total Wounded in Action 2001 11 33 2002 49 74 2003 45 99 2004 52 214 2005 98 267 2006 98 401 2007 117 750 2008 155 793 2009 311 2,144 2010 499 5,226 2011 through April 4 81 854 Source: U.S. Department of Defense, Statistical Information Analysis Division, http://siadapp.dmdc.osd.mil/ personnel/casualty/oefmonth.pdf. Congressional Research Service 1

Table 3. Deaths of Coalition Partners in Afghanistan Country a # of Deaths Country # of Deaths Australia 23 Lithuania 1 Belgium 1 Netherlands 24 Canada 156 New Zealand 3 Czech Republic 3 Norway 9 Denmark 39 Poland 26 Estonia 8 Portugal 2 Finland 2 Romania 17 France 55 South Korea 1 Georgia 7 Spain 30 Germany 48 Sweden 4 Hungary 4 Turkey 2 Italy 33 United Kingdom 362 Latvia 4 Total Non-U.S. Coalition Fatalities 864 Sources: CNN Casualties in Afghanistan, http://www.cnn.com/specials/war.casualties/table.afghanistan.html; Canada s Department of National Defence, http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/news-nouvelles/fallen-disparus/indexeng.asp; United Kingdom Ministry of Defense, http://www.mod.uk/defenceinternet/factsheets/ OperationsFactsheets/OperationsInAfghanistanBritishFatalities.htm; Australia s Department of Defence, http://www.defence.gov.au/op/afghanistan/info/personnel.htm; Factbox: Military Deaths in Afghanistan, Reuters News, March 29, 2011. a. Countries listed indicate the nationality of the military forces, not of the individuals. For example, Fijians who were killed while fighting in French forces are counted as French. Similarly, citizens of other nations who fight in American military forces are counted as Americans. Table 4. Afghan Casualties Group Period # of Casualties Note Afghan Civilians Jan-March 2011 a 203 killed 356 injured 2010 b 2,777 killed 4,343 injured A truck bomb at the office of a construction company and a suicide bomber at an Afghan National Army recruitment center resulted in the deaths of 56 civilians in March. Anti-government elements (AGEs), which include the Taliban and other individuals or groups who engage in armed conflict with the government of Afghanistan or members of the International Military Forces, were reported responsible for 75% of the civilian deaths and 78% of civilian injuries. The number of civilians assassinated by AGEs increased 105%, to 462 persons, compared with civilian assassinations in 2009. Congressional Research Service 2

Group Period # of Casualties Note Afghan National Army Afghan National Police 2009 c 2,412 killed 3,566 injured 2008 d 2,118 killed 2007 d 1,523 killed Jan-March 2011 e 34 killed 8 wounded 2010 806 killed f 775 wounded g 2009 h 292 killed 859 wounded 2008 i 259 killed 875 wounded 2007 i 278 killed 750 wounded Jan-March 2011 e 13 killed 27 wounded 2010 j 1,250 killed 743 wounded 2009 k 639 killed 1,145 wounded 2008 l 724 killed 1,209 wounded 2007 l 688 killed 1,036 wounded 67% of civilian deaths were attributed to actions of AGEs (78% of these deaths were caused by improvised explosive devices and suicide attacks). 25% of civilian deaths were attributed to pro-government forces. 8% of civilian deaths were the result of cross-fire or improperly detonated ordnance. News sources include the report that, as of March 16, 21 soldiers had been killed in the previous 21 days. Information released by General Zahir Azimi, spokesman for the Afghan Defence Ministry. Source: Compiled by the Congressional Research Service from noted sources. a. Press reports from Reuters, the Pajhwok Afghan News agency, the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, Daily Outlook Afghanistan, and Family Vanishes in Attack on Market, The New York Times, January 30, 2011. b. United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan, Human Rights Unit, Afghanistan: Annual Report on Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, 2010, March 2011, p. i-1, http://unama.unmissions.org/portals/ UNAMA/human%20rights/March%20PoC%20Annual%20Report%20Final.pdf. Congressional Research Service 3

c. United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan, Human Rights Unit, Afghanistan: Annual Report on Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, 2009, January 2010, p. I, http://unama.unmissions.org/portals/ UNAMA/human%20rights/Protection%20of%20Civilian%202009%20report%20English.pdf. d. United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan, Human Rights Unit, Afghanistan: Annual Report on Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, 2008, January 2009, p. 12, http://unama.unmissions.org/portals/ UNAMA/human%20rights/UNAMA_09february-Annual%20Report_PoC%202008_FINAL_11Feb09.pdf. e. Press reports from Reuters and the Pajhwok Afghan News agency. f. Afghan Army Casualties Increase, Pajhwok Afghan News, December 22, 2010; More Than 800 Afghan Soldiers Killed This Year, Army Says, Trend News Agency [Azerbaijan], December 22, 2010. g. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, April 30, 2010, p. 58, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/apr2010/sigarapril_lores.pdf; response via e-mail from the staff of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, August 9, 2010; and press reports from Reuters and the Pajhwok Afghan News agency. h. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, July 30, 2009, p. 55. http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/jul09/pdf/report_-_july_2009.pdf; Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, October 30, 2009, p. 62, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/ Oct09/pdf/SIGAROct2009Web.pdf; and Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, January 30, 2010, p. 64, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/ quarterlyreports/jan2010/pdf/sigar_jan2010.pdf. i. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, July 30, 2009, p. 55, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/jul09/pdf/report_-_july_2009.pdf. j. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, April 30, 2010, p. 64, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/apr2010/sigarapril_lores.pdf; response via e-mail from the staff of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, August 9, 2010; Blast Leaves 2 Afghan Soldiers Dead in Logar, Pajhwok Afghan News, January 8, 2011, and press reports from Reuters and the Pajhwok Afghan News agency. k. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, July 30, 2009, p. 60, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/jul09/pdf/report_-_july_2009.pdf; Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, October 30, 2009, p. 66, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/ Oct09/pdf/SIGAROct2009Web.pdf; and Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, January 30, 2010, p. 69, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/ quarterlyreports/jan2010/pdf/sigar_jan2010.pdf. l. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, July 30, 2009, p. 60, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/jul09/pdf/report_-_july_2009.pdf. Author Contact Information Susan G. Chesser Information Research Specialist schesser@crs.loc.gov, 7-9547 Congressional Research Service 4