STIP. Van Argabright November 9, 2017

Similar documents
NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 14B 1

Transportation Planning & Investment in Urban North Carolina

HOW DOES A PROJECT GET INTO THE STIP?

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2014 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs

North Carolina Turnpike Authority Joint Appropriations Committee on Transportation Beau Memory & Rodger Rochelle

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

POLICIES RELATING TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING

339 New Leicester Highway, Suite 140 Asheville. NC

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014

SMART SCALE Policy Guide

Toll Project Development Policy. Mark Boggs, P.E.

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County

NCDOT Planning Summary for NCTA Projects

FY May Quarterly Revision AUSTIN DISTRICT

HB2 Update October, 2014

Summary of. Overview. existing law. to coal ash. billion in FY. funding in FY 2013 FY 2014

Megan P. Hall, P.E. Local Programs Engineer. Federal Highway Administration Washington Division. March 14, 2017

Welcome to the WebEx. The presentation for the 2018 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Public Meeting will begin shortly.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Transportation and the Federal Government

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

Section 6. The Transportation Plan

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

Falling Forward: A Guide to the FAST Act

Oregon Statewide Transportation Improvement Program. STIP Users Guide

Project Selection Advisory Council

VIRGINIA S P3 PROGRAM

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

LAP Manual 7-1 February 2014 Compliance Assessment Program Requirements

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

2018 Call for Projects Guidebook

DCHC MPO Funding Source Overview & Guidance draft January 2015

INTRODUCTION. RTPO Model Program Guide February 27, 2007 Page 1

San Francisco Transportation Task Force 2045

Deval Patrick, Governor Timothy P. Murray, Lieutenant Governor Jeffrey B. Mullan, Secretary of Transportation and Chief Executive Officer

Project Information. Application ID 2015-D08-01 Date Submitted 6/29/2015. Mill Creek Expressway, Phase 8A. County, Route, Section HAM-4/ /7.

Overview of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program

FFY Transportation Improvement Program

Draft MAPA FY2019-FY2024 Transportation Improvement Program

Measure A Strategic Plan Update Citizens Advisory Committee July 1, 2014

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Notice of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement, I-495 & I-270 Managed

South Dakota Department of Transportation. State Planning & Research Program for Local Governments

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Legislative Program

Staff Report. Allocation of Congestion Management and Air Quality Improvement Program Funding

Understanding the. Program

Mid-East RPO - SPOT Local Input Point Assignment Methodology

2016 Measure B Program Areas

By Rmhermen at en.wikipedia (photo by rmhermen) [GFDL ( or CC-BY-SA-3.0

2018 Project Selection Process. Transportation Policy Board January 11, 2018

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

S E N A T E F I S C A L O F F I C E I S S U E B R I E F 2016-S RhodeWorks FEBRUARY 2, 2016

DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION REPORT ON AUDIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

Brownfields Conference Oklahoma City, OK May 22, What is FHWA?

MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements

APPENDIX 5. Funding Plan

FUNDING POLICY GUIDELINES

Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011

Transportation Improvement Program FY

MiTIP APPLICATION PACKET

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update. Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017

Lake Norman Regional Transportation Commission AGENDA March 8, 2017

Funding Principles. Years Passed New Revenue Credit Score Multiplier >3 years 0% % % % After Jan %

$5.2 Billion Transportation Funding Deal Announced, includes $1.5 Billion for Local Streets and Roads

Navigating MAP 21. Securing Federal Funding for Community Walking & Biking Projects

MaineDOT Work Plan. Calendar Years. January 201

9. Positioning Ports for Grant Funding and Government Loan Programs

Regional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX B

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

ATTENDANCE. Chairman Kufro called the meeting to order at 1:32 p.m. 2. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 6, 2016

Smart Region Smart Transportation

CALVERT - ST. MARY S METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects

Transportation Planning Prospectus

RPO Technical Coordinating Committee February 9th, :00 A.M., Land of Sky Regional Council Agenda

339 New Leicester Highway, Suite 140 Asheville. NC Long-Range Transportation Plan Transportation Improvement Program Highway

J o i n t T e c h n i c a l C o o r d i n a t i n g C o m m i t t e e a n d G o v e r n i n g B o a r d

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

J o i n t T e c h n i c a l C o o r d i n a t i n g C o m m i t t e e a n d G o v e r n i n g B o a r d

Washington State Department of Transportation

Special Meeting Agenda

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Recreational Trails Program (RTP)

National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board

AMERICA BIKES SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROGRAMS SAFETEA LU VS. MAP 21

THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA

2018 Project Selection Process

Community Advisory Panel Meeting #

Please complete your phone connection now:

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

Funding the plan. STBG - This program is designed to address specific issues

SAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background

Submission: House Bill2 Legislation and Implementation

The Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization adopted the amendment to the Program on April 16, 2014.

2014 TRAC Funding Application. Cost ODOT greater than $12 million dollars Increase roadway capacity or reduce congestion.

Transcription:

2018-2027 STIP Van Argabright November 9, 2017

2018-2027 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Adopted by BOT in August 2017 2 nd STIP produced under the Strategic Transportation Investments (STI) legislation STI is data-driven, making the best use of our transportation revenue to create more jobs and improve connectivity STIP includes capital projects for six modes of transportation: Aviation Highways Bicycle and Pedestrian Rail Ferry Transit Total of 1,389 projects, including 344 non-highway projects 2

2018-2027 STIP Project Summary Transition, 22 By Project Type Alt. Criteria (Highway), 273 75% Highway 25% Non-Highway Rail, 40 Public Transit, 41 Ferry, 5 Highway, Capacity 750 Bicycle-Pedestrian, 162 Aviation, 96 3

2018-2027 STIP Project Type Highway Bike/Ped Aviation Transit Rail Ferry Transition 1,023 162 96 41 40 5 22 Highway Project Breakdown: 122 Bridge Replacement 98 Interstate Maintenance 750 Roadway Capacity Improvement 53 Safety Note: Project count does not include CMAQ, or future holdout STBG-DA, Bridge, Safety and Interstate Maintenance projects 4

# of projects Number of STIP Comparison 800 700 600 1364 projects in 2012-2020 STIP 1074 projects in 2016-2025 STIP 1389 projects in 2018-2027 STIP 500 400 300 200 2012-2020 STIP 2016-2025 STIP 2018-2027 STIP 100 0 5

$ (in billions) Revenue Availability Comparison 30 25 20 15 10 5 reserves for engineering, construction cost over-runs, bonus allocation, inflation funds available for programming 0 2016-2025 STIP 2016-2025 STIP (post HB 97) 2018-2027 STIP 6

2018-2027 STIP Programmed Amount Public Transit, $40M (0.2%) Rail, $508M (2.2%) Alt. Criteria, $1.3B (5.8%) Ferry, $33M (0.1%) Bicycle-Pedestrian, $168M (0.7%) Aviation, $161M (0.7%) Transition, $335 M (1.5 %) By Project Type 96% Highway 4% Non-Highway Highway, $20.1B (88.7%) 7

Percentage of funding FUNDING DISTRIBUTION BY REGION IN THE 2018-2027 STIP 25% 20% Average 15% 10% 5% 0% A B C D E F G [1 & 4] [2 & 3] [5 & 6] [7 & 9] [8 & 10] [11 & 12] [13 & 14] Region [Divisions] 8

dollars per person 3500 PER CAPITA FUNDING BY REGION IN THE 2018-2027 STIP 3000 2500 Average 2000 1500 1000 500 0 A B C D E F G [1 & 4] [2 & 3] [5 & 6] [7 & 9] [8 & 10] [11 & 12] [13 & 14] Region [Divisions] 9

percentage of funding FUNDING DISTRIBUTION BY DIVISION IN THE 2018-2027 STIP 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Average 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Division 10

dollars per person PER CAPITA FUNDING BY DIVISION IN THE 2018-2027 STIP 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Average 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Division 11

STIP Blocks Exempt programs and transition projects Statewide Mobility Regional Impact STIP Alternate Criteria Division Needs 12

Exempt Programs Exempt Programs - projects that will be funded in the STIP but are not subject to the provisions of the STI law. Examples include: Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality projects (CMAQ) funded at $30 M annually Appalachian Development Highway funds currently $260M available Federal competitive or discretionary grant funds Transition projects projects that were scheduled for letting by June 2015 as of October 2013 13

Statewide Mobility Exempt programs and transition projects Regional Impact STIP Alternate Criteria Division Needs 14

Alternate Criteria Bridge Replacements (target is $50 M per year) Interstate Maintenance (target is $100 M per year) Highway Safety Improvements (target is $40 M per year) Economic Development (legislation restricts use to $10 M maximum per fiscal year) Federal Surface Transportation Block Grant Funds that are directly attributable to MPOs with population > 200 K ($62 M per year) Federal Transportation Alternative Funds that are directly attributable to MPOs with population > 200 K ($4.7 M per year) Emergency funds (no funding to date) 15

ALTERNATE CRITERIA (Interstate Maintenance, Bridge, & Safety) 16

STI Overview 40% of Funds 30% of Funds 30% of Funds Statewide Mobility 100% Data Regional Impact 70% Data 30% Local Input Funding based on population within Region (7) Division Needs 50% Data 50% Local Input Funding based on equal share for each Division (14) 17

Statewide Mobility Exempt programs and transition projects Regional Impact STIP Alternate Criteria Division Needs 18

P4.0 Statewide Mobility 40% of Funds $9.0 B for 10 Year Program Project selection: 100% technical score 153 projects: 130 highway 15 aviation 8 rail in 30 counties 19

STATEWIDE MOBILITY 20

Corridor Cap Growth STI directs that no more than 10 percent of the funds projected to be allocated to the SW Mobility category over any five-year period be assigned to a project or group of projects in the same corridor within a Transportation Division or adjoining Divisions. Corridor caps in the 2016-2025 STIP 1 st 5 years = $197 M 2 nd 5 years = $298 M Corridor caps in the 2018-2027 STIP 1 st 5 years = $435 M 2 nd 5 years = $473 M Why has the cap risen? Revenue growth and less transition projects to pay for. 21

Statewide Mobility Exempt programs and transition projects Regional Impact STIP Alternate Criteria Division Needs 22

P4.0 $7.0 B for 10 year program Project selection: 70% technical score 30% local input 342 projects: 273 highway 30 public transportation 16 aviation 23 rail in 59 counties Regional Impact 30% of Funds 23

REGIONAL IMPACT 24

Regional Funding Allocations Distribution Regions Population % of State Population 10-Year Allocation (In Thou) A (Divs. 1&4) 853,654 8.58% $581,789 B (Divs. 2&3) 1,208,782 12.14% $823,819 C (Divs. 5&6) 2,185,131 21.95% $1,489,229 D (Divs. 7&9) 1,679,814 16.88% $1,144,841 E (Divs. 8&10) 2,032,197 20.42% $1,385,000 F (Divs. 11&12) 1,123,045 11.28% $765,387 G (Divs. 13&14) 871,064 8.75% $593,655 9,953,687 $6,783,720 25

Statewide Mobility Exempt programs and transition projects Regional Impact STIP Alternate Criteria Division Needs 26

P4.0 Division Needs $7.0 B for 10 year program Project selection: 50% technical score 50% local input 599 projects: 347 highway 162 bicycle/pedestrian 11 public transportation 65 aviation 9 rail 5 ferry in 93 counties 30% of Funds 27

DIVISION NEEDS 28

Funding Caps and Restrictions Statewide Program Corridor Cap impacted projects on the I-26 corridor in Buncombe and Henderson Counties; I- 77 corridor in Mecklenburg and Iredell Counties; and the I- 40 Corridor in Wake, Durham, Orange and Johnston Counties, NC 540 in Wake and Johnston Counties Annual funding limits on airport projects in the Statewide, Regional, and Division categories Funding limits on Regional transit projects Funding limits on commuter rail and light rail projects Prohibition on using state funds to match federal-aid for independent bicycle and pedestrian projects 29

Bonus Allocation STI Law provides for Bonus Allocations to local jurisdictions for providing a portion of the construction cost of a project 50% of the direct participation amount, or 50% of the amount of toll revenue bonds (up to $100 M) go back to the County or Counties for other highway projects The bonus allocation must be used over the five-year period in the STIP following the contractual obligation. To date, $749 M in Bonus Allocation funds authorized or reserved: 19 Budgeted Amounts 9 toll bond revenue and 10 direct contributions 10 Counties eligible for allocations $70 Million already authorized; $308 million reserved or programmed in 10 year (2018 2027) window; and $371 million beyond 2027 30

Toll Cap Law limits number of projects Turnpike Authority can operate to 11 No limit on the number that can be programmed One Turnpike Authority Project Operating: Triangle Expressway Two Turnpike Authority Under Construction: Monroe Bypass I-77 Managed Lanes This leaves 8 additional projects the Turnpike Authority can operate 31

Normalization and Modal Project Selection for Regional Impact and Division Needs Categories 4% minimum programmed for non-highway mode. First step in programming. competed statewide. 90% minimum programmed for highway mode. Second step of programming. competed by region and division. 6% remaining funds could be programmed on either highway or non-highway mode projects. completed by region and division. 32

Cascade Effect Statewide Mobility Regional Impact Statewide Mobility 66 projects funded $1.9B Division Needs Statewide Mobility 21 projects funded $820M Regional Impact 76 projects funded $1.3B 33

Programming Changes to Expedite Project Delivery 2018-2027 STIP Development: After release of Draft STIP, projects added to STIP for Planning Only Allowed engineering work to begin prior to final adoption of the STIP Early project development = project acceleration Future STIP Development: will be added to current STIP for Planning Only in 3 stages 1. After release of Statewide Mobility projects (9 months ahead of the release of the Draft STIP) 2. After release of Regional Impact projects (4 months ahead of the release of the Draft STIP) 3. After release of Division Needs projects (this occurs at the release of the Draft STIP) 34

http://www.ncdot.gov/strategictransportationinvestments/

QUESTIONS? Van Argabright 919-707-4622 vargabright@ncdot.gov 36