Planning Committee STAFF REPORT October 7, 2015 Page 2 of 6 Changes from Committee Background MTC began preparing its 2017 RTP Update earlier this yea

Similar documents
LIFELINE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM CALL FOR PROJECTS

Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT October 19, 2016 Page 2 of 2 Background On July 20, 2016 the Authority approved Resolution G

.?-& Approved as to Fonn. R. ZIEGLER, County Counsel THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMD~, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NUMBER:

PRESENTER: Chris Blunk, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer

Alameda County Transportation Commission. A New Direction. Deliver. Plan Fund. ALAMEDA County Transportation Commission 1

CHAPTER 8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Key Topics: Legislative Requirements. 2. Legislative Intent and Application to San Francisco

15 1. John Yehall Chin Elementary Safe Routes to School Project;

Alameda County Transportation. Commission. A New Direction. Deliver. Plan Fund ALAMEDA. County Transportation. Commission

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

Subject: Lifeline Cycle 4 Grant Funding

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE & AGENDA

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Legislative Program

Memorandum. Date: To: Prospective Project Sponsors From: Aprile Smith Senior Transportation Planner Through: Subject:

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Citizens Advisory Committee May 23, 2012

Long Range Transportation Plan

RESOLUTION NO. 18-XX RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

This page left blank intentionally.

Regional Transportation Plan & Sustainable Communities Strategy. Public Participation Plan

Memorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 399 Elmhurst Street Hayward, CA (510)

Program Manager Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Supplemental Questions required. See at the bottom of announcement.

INTRODUCTION. RTPO Model Program Guide February 27, 2007 Page 1

August 9, Re: DBE Program Triennial Goal Concurrence - Recipient ID #1674. Dear Mr. Smith:

Memorandum. P:\Lifeline Program\2014 Lifeline Program\Call for Projects\LTP Cycle 4 Call - Memo.doc Page 1 of 7

Shaping Investments for San Francisco s Transportation Future The 2017 San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP) Update

Plan Bay Area 2040 Public Outreach and Participation Evaluation January 2018

Chapter 8. Glossary and Index. Chapter 8

FOOTNOTE: In accordance with Government Code Section 84308, no Commissioner shall accept, solicit, or direct a contribution of more than two hundred

The next steps outlined at the end of this section are the key requirements as we can best envision them at this stage.

Regional Sustainable Infrastructure Planning Grant Program Cycle 1. FINAL Draft

RESOLUTION ADOPTINGPRINCIPLES AND APPROVING A LIST OF CANDIDATE PROJECTS AND FUNDING REQUESTS FOR REGIONAL MEASURE 3

MOBILITY PARTNERSHIP AGENDA

1 Introduction. 1.1 Specific Plan Background

Downtown Oakland Specific Plan Frequently Asked Questions

FISCAL & COMPLIANCE AUDITS

SBCAG STAFF REPORT. Senate Bill 1 (SB1) State Funding Strategy for U.S. 101 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane and Parallel Projects

Climate Initiatives Program. Competitive Grants Guidelines METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Public-Private Partnership Program May 2015 Transit Coalition Update

Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee September 14, 2015 Page 2 of 5 No. Action Item Response Opened Due Status 4 Develop 3-4 alternative scenarios for

A Guide to the TIP. Metropolitan Transportation Commission. August 2010

AMENDED IN COMMITTEE 11/30/17 RESOLUTION NO

AGENDA. 2. Minutes: Approve Minutes of October 18, 2017 ACTION State Transportation Improvement Program ACTION Funding Recommendations

Finance Committee October 18, 2011

San Francisco Transportation Task Force 2045

Authority Board March 26, 2013

Memorandum. Date: RE: Citizens Advisory Committee

1. Review/Revise Accept/Minutes of the April 24, 2014 TAC Meeting. ACTION: Accept April 24, 2014 TAC minutes and/or as revised/determined.

Re: Comments on the Draft Guidelines for the Low-Carbon Transit Operations Program

2016 Measure B Program Areas

CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM & PLANNING COMMITTEE PLEASE NOTE CHANGE IN MEETING TIME AGENDA

Transmittal # Scheduled Review Date: 2/15/19 Attachments: Replaces Policy Dated: 9/1/11 A - Grant Opportunity Approval Form APPROVED:

Long-Range Planning Public Engagement Plan 2018 Amendments

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program

POLICIES RELATING TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING

RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ALBANY' S CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN AS REQUIRED BY

SCHOOL BOARD ACTION REPORT

Memorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee

9. PROJECTED EXPENDITURES FUND CFDA ITEM/APPROPRIATION F.Y. CHAPTER STATUTE PROJECTED EXPENDITURES General Fund N/A / $3,5

Measure A Strategic Plan Update Citizens Advisory Committee July 1, 2014

2004 Transportation Expenditure Plan

ATTACHMENT B. Opportunities to Implement Measure M Through New and Expanded State and Federal Transportation Funding Programs

AGENDA BILL. Beaverton City Council Beaverton, Oregon BUDGET IMPACT EXPENDITURE AMOUNT APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $60,000 BUDGETED $-0- REQUIRED $60,000*

Lifeline Transportation Program Cycle 5 Guidelines

General Plan Referral

NOW THEREFORE, the parties enter into the following Agreement:

339 New Leicester Highway, Suite 140 Asheville. NC Long-Range Transportation Plan Transportation Improvement Program Highway

County of Fairfax, Virginia

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS EASTERN COACHELLA VALLEY S ACTION PLAN FOR CLIMATE RESILIENCE BACKGROUND AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION

Program Management Plan

MEMORANDUM. February 12, Interagency Transit Committee Members and Interested Parties. Anthony Zepeda, Associate Regional Planner

VTA s BART Silicon Valley Extension BART Phase II Project Update

HOW DOES A PROJECT GET INTO THE STIP?

Grant: Safe Routes to Transit Initial Project Report for Ed Roberts Campus

APP NVITAT ON LETTERS COOPERATING AGENCY - Agency Categories:

Sustainable Communities Grant Consortium Consortium Agreement

One Bay Area Grant (OBAG): Local Program Development - Criteria ACTION ITEM

CITY OF EAST WENATCHEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Posey County Long Range Transportation Plan

WESTERN SLOPE CIP AND TIM FEE UPDATE

EPA s Integrated Risk Information System Assessment Development Procedures

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT GUIDELINES FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS Draft for Public Comment. January 15, 2014

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Transit-Oriented Development and Land Use Subarea Plan for Central Lake Forest Park

Greetings from the San Francisco Bay Area

Renewed Measure M2 Eligibility Requirements Workshop. Orange County Transportation Authority April 12, 2011

WHEREAS, the Transit Operator provides mass transportation services within the Madison Urbanized Area; and

City of Seattle Comprehensive Plan Update

$5.2 Billion Transportation Funding Deal Announced, includes $1.5 Billion for Local Streets and Roads

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

Strategic Plan

Regional Measure 3. Citizens Advisory Committee Agenda Item 12. SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY February 14, 2017

Early Intervention. Center. pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development. Program Guidelines

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

Citizen Participation Plan DRAFT. City of Oxnard. Proposed to be Amended July 10, Prepared by:

SILICON VALLEY RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDOR BART EXTENSION TO MILPITAS, SAN JOSE AND SANTA CLARA POLICY ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES

Background Materials

STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NOTICE NUMBER 03A2139

Transcription:

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: October 7, 2015 Subject Summary of Issues Approval of Resolution 15-4-G and Transmittal of Recommended Project Lists to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for Inclusion in the 2017 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) At its meeting on September 16, 2015, the Authority reviewed the proposed 2017 RTP list with the intention to forward it to MTC in October after providing additional opportunities for public comment. At this time, no comments were received and staff recommends forwarding the lists to MTC. Local jurisdictions, the Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPCs), and transit agencies submitted 211 projects/programs with a total cost of $15.3 billion in Year of Expenditure (YOE) dollars and funding requests of $8.1 billion. In addition, BART also submitted five region-wide projects with a cost of $9.7 billion. Recommendations Financial Implications Options Attachments Staff requests that the Authority approve Resolution 15-49-G and forward the 2017 RTP list recommendation to MTC. Projects that are not included in the 2017 RTP will be ineligible to receive future State or federal funding. A funding target of $2.3 billion in YOE dollars is being used as a starting point for the project lists. Refine the project lists as needed or take no action at this time. A. Resolution 15-49-G regarding Submittal of Contra Costa Transportation Authority s Proposed 2017 RTP Capital Projects List to MTC, transmitting: Exhibit 1: Proposed Committed Project List Exhibit 2: Proposed Financially Constrained Project List Exhibit 3: Proposed Vision Project List B. Draft Letter to MTC Regarding Proposed 2017 RTP Project Lists S:\05-PC Packets\2015\10\02 - Brdltr.RTP.docx 2-1

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT October 7, 2015 Page 2 of 6 Changes from Committee Background MTC began preparing its 2017 RTP Update earlier this year. As a planning document, the 2017 RTP Update will outline the region s programmatic and policy objectives for the 24-year time period of 2017 through 2040. Adoption of the Final 2017 RTP is tentatively scheduled for earlyto-mid 2017. State and federal law require that the RTP include the following four elements: 1. Policy; 2. Action; 3. Financial; and, 4. Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) State and federal law also require that every RTP is financially constrained, that is, the total cost of the programs and projects included in the Action Element of the RTP must not exceed the expected revenues forecast in the Financial Element. Any transportation project requiring future State or federal funding must be included within that element. MTC s schedule calls for the draft Financial Element to be developed later this year. State law also requires the RTP to be internally consistent. That is, the projects proposed must fit within the financial constraints identified and must support the land use and development pattern that the SCS will establish. Call for Projects for the 2017 RTP MTC s Call for Projects for the 2017 RTP (T-2040) was issued on April 29, 2015. As part of the Call for Projects, each Congestion Management Agency (CMA) was requested to coordinate project submittals from its county and assist with public outreach. Following the Planning Committee meeting on May 6, 2015, a letter was sent to the RTPCs and transit operators to begin the process with a list of projects from the last RTP. The list included: 1) committed projects that are currently fully funded (from local, State or federal sources) or will be fully funded with local funds; 2) a financially constrained list of candidate RTP projects to be funded with existing fund sources such as State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), Surface Transportation Program (STP), and others; and 3) a list S:\05-PC Packets\2015\10\02 - Brdltr.RTP.docx 2-2

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT October 7, 2015 Page 3 of 6 of additional projects that would require additional funding beyond the 2017 RTP financial constraints, for possible inclusion in a vision element of the RTP. During June and July, Authority staff worked with project sponsors and the RTPCs to respond to the Call for Projects. Core evaluation criteria recommended by the Authority to prioritize projects included completion of Measure J projects and project readiness. Project sponsors were also encouraged to submit projects that support stated 2017 RTP goals. Based upon the input received, Authority staff has developed three project lists for transmittal to MTC Committed, Financially Constrained, and Vision. The information contained on these lists was entered electronically to MTC s database during September, and the Authority Board s approval (by resolution) of the submittal is due to MTC by the end of October. The Authority reviewed the RTP list at it September 16, 2015 meeting and no public comments were received. Funding Target Draft discretionary funding targets for the 2017 RTP are expected to be released by MTC later this year. A funding target similar to the last RTP of approximately $2.3 billion in YOE dollars is being used as a starting point for the financially constrained project list. Public Outreach Plan MTC requested that each Bay Area CMA undertake a public outreach effort to complement the broader effort undertaken by the regional agencies. CMA participation was required as part of an interagency agreement between CCTA and MTC enabling receipt of federal funds. The objective of the outreach effort was to encourage all interested stakeholders and transportation constituents to participate in and comment on the RTP/SCS development process. Initially, for the previous RTP cycle, a comprehensive outreach effort as approved by the Authority in March 2011 was focused on providing opportunities for public input into the 2013 RTP Call for Projects. It was one component of a broader, more comprehensive outreach effort that was conducted later by the regional agencies. Following this effort, the Authority initiated a comprehensive Public Outreach effort to inform our stakeholders and the general public about the 2014 Countywide CTP, which provides a foundation for the RTP. This effort included the following components: S:\05-PC Packets\2015\10\02 - Brdltr.RTP.docx 2-3

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT October 7, 2015 Page 4 of 6 Four public workshops, one in each planning area of the County; Two public opinion polls to gauge the public s views on transportation issues and improvements; Two sets of focus groups, first to explore the public s sentiment on various proposed transportation projects and programs, and second to understand the public s views on transportation innovation and new technologies; An online public engagement tool that allowed members of the public to submit their best ideas for improving transportation; A telephone town hall that was held countywide and had more than 1,300 participants; and Printed surveys that enabled citizens who prefer to work with hard copy rather than the internet to share their project ideas. Following the public outreach effort, Authority staff met with the RTPCs and informed them of the input received. During June and July, the Authority provided the RTPCs with a qualitative evaluation of major projects using MTC s performance criteria from the 2013 RTP to help the RTPCs develop their submittals. Public meetings were held during August and September of 2015 at the Authority offices located at 2999 Oak Road, Ste. 100, Walnut Creek, CA 94597. These meetings provided members of the public an opportunity to comment on the proposed Draft RTP projects lists. The dates of these meetings were as follows: Thursday, August 27 th, 2015 at 2:30 p.m. (TCC) Wednesday, September 2 nd, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. (Planning Committee) Wednesday, September 16 th, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. (Authority Board) During October, members of the public will have further opportunity to comment as follows: Wednesday, October 7 th, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. (Planning Committee) Wednesday, October 21 st, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. (Authority Board) The proposed Draft 2017 RTP Committed and Financially Constrained project lists reflect the results of this public outreach and the qualitative assessment of major projects as well as S:\05-PC Packets\2015\10\02 - Brdltr.RTP.docx 2-4

S:\05-PC Packets\2015\10\02 - Brdltr.RTP.docx Planning Committee STAFF REPORT October 7, 2015 Page 5 of 6 completion of Measure J projects, previous commitments and project readiness. Projects on the Vision list generally lack committed funding, or are not yet ready for construction. Even as extensive as these lists are, they are only a subset of the larger list of projects and programs that sponsors are pursuing. Summary of Submitted Projects There are 211 projects/programs that have been submitted with a total cost of $15.3 billion in YOE dollars and funding requests of $8.1 billion. Of those, 45 projects are on the Committed List with a cost of $2.4 billion. No federal/state funding is sought by committed projects since they are currently fully funded or expected to be fully funded with local sources. The Financially Constrained List includes 88 projects with a total cost of $7.1 billion. Fully funding these projects will require $2.3 billion from discretionary fund sources. The Vision List contains 78 projects costing $5.8 billion, and is unfunded. In addition, five BART region-wide projects were also submitted with a cost of $9.7 billion. Projects on this list will serve as a backup to be advanced to the Financially Constrained List should new fund sources be assumed in the 2017 RTP. Authority staff reviewed the submitted lists and cross-checked them with the projects and programs in the Comprehensive Transportation Project List (CTPL). Project Evaluation Following the Call for Projects, Authority staff published a qualitative evaluation of all projects with costs greater than $25 million. The evaluation applied MTC s criteria from the 2013 RTP and was made available to the RTPC s for use in developing the project lists. For the 2017 RTP, MTC staff intends to develop and apply new criteria to evaluate how projects meet stated 2017 RTP goals. MTC will undertake this project-level performance evaluation to determine which projects to ultimately include in MTC s financially constrained element of the RTP. The project evaluation phase is tentatively scheduled for September through November 2015. Following the completion of the performance evaluation, MTC will notify the CMAs regarding which projects have performed adequately for inclusion in the RTP. Projects that are not committed will be subject to evaluation using the above-mentioned qualitative assessment. In addition, MTC will conduct quantitative benefit-cost analysis of projects with costs greater than $50 million (in 2015 dollars). For the 2017 RTP, a project is considered committed if it is expected to be fully funded with local funds, or if it is fully 2-5

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT October 7, 2015 Page 6 of 6 funded with a mix of local, State, and/or federal funds and expected to have environmental clearance by September 2015. The three lists compiled by staff (Committed, Financially Constrained, and Vision) will inform MTC of Contra Costa s priorities during the evaluation process, which take into account delivery of Measure J projects. Tentative Schedule Below is a timeline of upcoming activities: Date October 7, 2015 October 21, 2015 Sept Nov 2015 January May 2016 January 2017 May 2017 Activity The Planning Committee has an opportunity to review and discuss any proposed changes to the submittal Authority approves proposed 2017 RTP Project Lists for submittal to MTC through adoption of Resolution 15-49-G MTC conducts project-level performance assessment MTC Releases Scenario Evaluation MTC Releases Draft 2017 RTP and Draft Environmental Impact report (EIR) MTC adopts final 2017 RTP and EIR S:\05-PC Packets\2015\10\02 - Brdltr.RTP.docx 2-6

ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION 15-49-G RE: Adoption of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority s Proposed 2017 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Projects Lists for Submittal to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) WHEREAS, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (the Authority ) has been designated as the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) by the cities, towns and County of Contra Costa; and WHEREAS, under the provisions of Sections 65082 (b) and 65088.5 (b) MTC is required to incorporate the Congestion Management Program (CMP) in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) submitted biennially to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for State and federal transportation funding in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), unless the CMP is inconsistent with the RTP; and WHEREAS, on April 29, 2015, MTC requested that all of the CMAs submit project lists totaling approximately $32 billion for the Bay Area, with Contra Costa's estimated population-based share at $4.48 billion (escalated); and WHEREAS, under Section 188.8 of the Streets and Highways Code county share funds are allocated by the CTC according to formula, and are required to be spent in each county as part of the STIP; and WHEREAS, the Measure C Sales Tax Renewal Ordinance (# 88-01 as amended by # 04-02), herein referred to as Measure J, approved by the voters in November 2004, allocates $2 billion in 2004 dollars to new transportation investments, including more than $800 million for various projects; and WHEREAS, building upon the June 2003 report, Shaping Our Future, the cities, towns and County have been working cooperatively with the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and MTC to better link land use and transportation, with many jurisdictions far along in developing specific plans or implementation of transit-oriented and/or dense mixed use development; and WHEREAS, to achieve the broad, multi-modal vision approved by the voters with the passage of Measure J, the Authority will need to match its local sales tax funds with its county share and funds from a variety of other sources; and 2-7

Resolution 15-49-G October 21, 2015 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Authority supports the broad goals of the 2017 RTP, and believes that the best way to accomplish those goals is for the Authority to work collaboratively with other CMAs, Caltrans and MTC to manage corridor congestion; better link transportation and land use; and provide effective transportation facilities and services that enhance mobility in an environmentally sensitive manner; and WHEREAS, the Authority is committed to working collaboratively with MTC through the Bay Area Partnership to address AB 32 and SB375, and has taken significant strides in that direction, through adoption of the Measure J Growth Management Program, which includes a requirement for each local jurisdiction to adopt a voter approved Urban Limit Line, and through its participation in the Sustainable Communities Strategy; and WHEREAS, since the initial development of the 2013 RTP, and following with Contra Costa s Draft 2014 CTP, the Authority has conducted an extensive public outreach process in accordance with MTC s Public Outreach Plan, including numerous RTPC meetings, several workshops, and a public hearing to solicit input on projects and programs for submittal to MTC; and WHEREAS, the Authority has developed its projects and programs to respond to and respect the diversity, uniqueness and varying needs of each part of Contra Costa County, and recognizes the eight other Bay Area counties have their own diverse characteristics and needs; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa is the third largest county by population in the region, is slated to absorb the third largest increase in population after Santa Clara and Alameda, and has provided a disproportionately higher share of affordable and workforce housing in the Bay Area in the past 25 years; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT IN RESPONSE TO MTC S FEBRUARY 29, 2015 REQUEST FOR SUBMITTAL OF PROJECTS, THE AUTHORITY HEREBY: (1) Adopts the attached capital project lists as shown in Exhibits 1, 2, and 3, for incorporation into the Draft 2017 RTP as follows: Exhibit 1: Proposed Committed Project List; Exhibit 2: Proposed Financially Constrained Project List; and Exhibit 3: Proposed Vision Element Project List. (2) Finds that Exhibits 1 and 2 constitute the Authority s core project lists for incorporation into the Draft 2017 RTP to best fulfill the mandate of the voters, balance Contra Costa s diverse needs with constrained STIP funding, and to address the goals set by MTC as part of the 2017 RTP process. 2-8

Resolution 15-49-G October 21, 2015 Page 3 (3) Should MTC s fund estimate for the financially constrained element of the RTP result in higher revenues than estimated herein, the Authority intends to work collaboratively with MTC to identify projects in the Vision Element for inclusion in the financially constrained element. Such projects should be modeled in a way that would make them eligible for future discretionary funding as part of the RTP s environmental impact report (EIR). Julie K. Pierce, Chair This RESOLUTION was entered into at a meeting of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority held October 21, 2015 in Walnut Creek, California Attest: Danice J. Rosenbohm, Executive Secretary 2-9

ATTACHMENT B COMMISSIONERS October 22, 2015 Julie Pierce, Chair Dave Hudson, Vice Chair Janet Abelson Newell Arnerich Tom Butt David Durant Federal Glover Karen Mitchoff Kevin Romick Don Tatzin Robert Taylor Randell H. Iwasaki, Executive Director Dave Cortese, Chair Metropolitan Transportation Commission Joseph P. Bort MetroCenter 101 Eighth Street Oakland, CA 94607-4700 Re: Transmittal of Resolution Adopting the Contra Costa Transportation Authority Proposed 2017 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Project Lists Dear Mr. Cortese: In response to the Call for Projects issued by MTC on April 29, 2015, the Authority is pleased to transmit to you its proposed lists of projects for inclusion in the 2017 RTP. At its regular meeting on October 21, 2015, the Authority adopted the attached Resolution 15-49-G, which clearly sets forth the Authority s project priorities for the Committed, Financially Constrained, and Vision Elements of the RTP Update. In parallel with this transmittal, we have also updated MTC s projects database to reflect the current scope, schedule, and budget for each project. Updates to the project list database were completed by Authority staff on September 30, 2015. Public Outreach Effort 2999 Oak Road Suite 100 Walnut Creek CA 94597 PHONE: 925.256.4700 FAX: 925.256.4701 www.ccta.net MTC requested that each Bay Area CMA undertake a public outreach effort to complement the broader effort undertaken by the regional agencies. CMA participation was required as part of an interagency agreement between CCTA and MTC enabling receipt of federal funds. The objective of the outreach effort was to encourage all interested stakeholders and transportation constituents to participate in and comment on the RTP/SCS development process. Initially, for the previous RTP cycle, a comprehensive outreach effort as approved by the Authority in March 2011 was focused on providing opportunities for public input into the 2013 RTP Call for Projects. It was one component of a broader, more comprehensive outreach effort that was conducted later by the regional agencies. Following this effort, the Authority initiated a comprehensive Public Outreach effort to inform our stakeholders and the general public about the 2014 Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan, which provides a foundation for the RTP. This effort included the following components: Four public workshops, one in each planning area of the County; 2-25

Dave Cortese, Chair MTC P a g e 2 Two public opinion polls to gauge the public s views on transportation issues and improvements; Two sets of focus groups, first to explore the public s sentiment on various proposed transportation projects and programs, and second to understand the public s views on transportation innovation and new technologies; An online public engagement tool that allowed members of the public to submit their best ideas for improving transportation; A telephone town hall that was held countywide and had more than 1,300 participants; and Printed surveys that enabled citizens who prefer to work with hard copy rather than the internet share their project ideas. Following the public outreach effort, Authority staff met with the RTPCs and informed them of the input received. During June and July, the Authority provided the RTPCs with a qualitative evaluation of major projects using MTC s performance criteria from the 2013 RTP to help the RTPCs develop their submittals. Public meetings were held during August and September of 2015 to allow members of the public to comment on the proposed draft RTP project lists as follows: Thursday, August 27 th, 2015 at 2:30 p.m. (Technical Coordinating Committee) Wednesday, September 2 nd, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. (Planning Committee) Wednesday, September 16th, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. (Authority Board) Wednesday, October 7th, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. (Planning Committee) Wednesday, October 21st, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. (Authority Board) The proposed draft 2017 RTP Committed and Financially Constrained lists reflect the results of this public outreach and the qualitative assessment of major projects as well as completion of Measure J Projects, previous commitments and project readiness. Projects on the Vision list generally lack committed funding, or are not yet ready for construction. Even as extensive as these lists are, they are only a subset of the larger list of projects and programs that sponsors are pursuing. S:\05-PC Packets\2015\10\02 - Attachment B draft Letter to MTC.v2.docx 2-26

Dave Cortese, Chair MTC P a g e 3 Please feel free to contact Martin Engelmann at (925) 256-4729 should you have any questions or require further information. Sincerely, Julie K. Pierce Chair Cc: CMA Directors RTPC Managers Attachments: Resolution 15-49-G File: 2-27

This Page Intentionally Blank