FY-15 Aviation CDR Command Selection Board Lessons Learned

Similar documents
FY-19 AVIATION COMMAND SCREEN BOARD TAKEAWAYS

FY-19 AMCSB TAKEAWAYS

FY-19-1 Test Pilot School Selection Board Lessons Learned February 2018

From: Commander, Navy Personnel Command To: President, FY-17 Surface Commander Command Screen Board

SHORE INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT SPECIALTY CAREER PATH BRIEF

PERS 41. Surface Warfare Officer XO/CO Mentoring Brief

AVIATION CAPTAIN ASSIGNMENTS AND INFORMATION HANDBOOK (December 2017)

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL THESIS

MEMORANDUM 14 July 2017 FROM: PERS-432G (VFA JO DETAILER) TO: FLEET VFA JUNIOR OFFICERS SUBJ: FIRST SHORE TOUR SLATING PROCESS

Aerospace Engineering Duty Officer (AEDO) Community Overview. August 2017

FALL FY18 FULL TIME SUPPORT (FTS) LATERAL TRANSFER/REDESIGNATION REQUIREMENTS

JO Slate Schedule 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q18. Slate Opens 2nd week July 18 2nd week October 18 2nd week January 19 2nd week April 18

CAPT Rick Cheeseman, USN Director, Surface Officer Assignments (PERS-41)

AVERAGE TIME TO ADVANCE CAREER MILESTONES SEA/SHORE FLOW. COMMISSIONING/ SPECIAL PROGRAMS AWVCM 23.6 Yrs CMDCM, CSEL, Lead Detailer

FY15 FTS AVIATION DEPARTMENT HEAD RETENTION BONUS (ADHRB) PROGRAM INFORMATION

MILPERSMAN OFFICER SPECIAL ASSIGNMENTS HUMAN RESOURCES (HR) OFFICER MILESTONE AND MAJOR COMMAND SCREENING AND QUALIFICATION

RESERVE OFFICER PROMOTIONS PERS-80

STG CAREER PATH (SW)

FY-15 Enlisted Continuation Board. Eligibility

BUPERSINST L 6 Jun BUPERSINST L NRC N1 6 Jun 2017 BUPERS INSTRUCTION L. From: Chief of Naval Personnel

Subj: SELECTION OF THE COMMANDING OFFICER, U.S. NAVY BAND, WASHINGTON, DC

FY-19 Active-Duty Staff Corps Community Brief Disclaimer

OP Monthly Status Report April 2018 FY Captain s Promotion Selection Board Statistics

BUPERS-31 EDO & Acquisition Corps Community Brief. September 2010

MILPERSMAN COM FAX

CAREER MILESTONES AVERAGE TIME TO ADVANCE. COMMISSIONING OR OTHER SPECIAL PROGRAMS AWOCM 23.6 Yrs CMC, CSC, CSEL, Lead Detailer.

MILPERSMAN a. The mission of the FTS officer program is to. (1) provide full-time training and management of the Navy Reserve,

OPNAVINST N2/N6 19 Aug 2014

CAPT Gene Black, USN Director, Surface Officer Assignments (PERS-41)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COMMANDER NAVY RESERVE FORCES COMMAND 1915 FORRESTAL DRIVE NORFOLK VIRGINIA

Subj: INFORMATION DOMINANCE CORPS COMMAND QUALIFICATION PROGRAM. Encl: (1) Sample Command Qualification Board Recommendation Letter

SELRES AE CAREER PATH SELECTED RESERVE (SELRES)

OPNAVINST E N Dec 2014

AWF CAREER PATH (NAC/AW)

CTT CAREER PATH (IW/SW/AW/SG/NAC/EXW)

CAPT Derek Trinque Director, Surface Officer Assignments PERS-41

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL SERVICE TRAINING COMMAND 2601A PAUL JONES STREET GREAT LAKES, ILLINOIS

Subj: OFFICE OF DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE MILITARY FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM

SEAL OFFICER COMMUNITY MANAGER FITNESS REPORT AND RECORD UPDATE GUIDANCE

End of Book Questions Chapter 2 Organization of Naval Aviation Mission and History of Naval Aviation

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY. From: Commanding Officer, Surface Warfare Officers School Command

COMMANDING OFFICER S TOOL KIT

Title slide. Submarine Officer Community Status Brief

AWO CAREER PATH SELECTED RESERVE (SELRES)

Officer Street-to-Fleet Database: Expanding Capabilities

EOD CAREER PATH COMMISSIONING OR OTHER SPECIAL PROGRAMS

M. D. ABNER By direction

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

OPNAVINST G 11 Apr 2011 CURRENT NAVY AVIATION SQUADRON LINEAGE LIST HOW TO TRACE SQUADRON LINEAGE

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL THESIS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Enlisted Placement and Distribution PERS-40

MILPERSMAN LATERAL TRANSFER AND CHANGE OF DESIGNATOR CODES OF REGULAR AND RESERVE OFFICER

PERS 42 DRUMBEAT (MAY 2018)

CNATRAINST K N1 13 Nov 12. Subj: MISSION AND FUNCTIONS OF TRAINING SQUADRONS AND SQUADRON AUGMENT UNITS

Enabling Officer Accession Cuts While Limiting Laterals

MILPER Message Number Proponent RCHS-AN

Command IA Coordinator Brief

CNATRAINST M N11 7 Feb 17. Subj: APPLICATION PROCEDURES AND QUALIFICATIONS FOR OFFICERS OF THE NAVY FLIGHT DEMONSTRATION SQUADRON (BLUE ANGELS)

Air Force ROTC Overview

OPNAVINST B N1/PERS-9 24 Oct 2013

PERS 42 DRUMBEAT (OCT 2015)

MILPERSMAN (901) NAVPERSCOM CUSTOMER SERVICE CENTER. (a) NAVSO P-6034, Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR)

MILPERSMAN OFFICER SPECIAL ASSIGNMENTS DEFENSE ATTACHE SERVICE (DAS): ATTACHE ASSIGNMENTS CH-50, 3 Feb 2015 Page 1 of 10

MILPERSMAN Free

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL THESIS

New Leadership for Naval Education and Training Command

Encl: (1) Definitions (2) FDHDIP Quotas for Eligible Ships, Squadrons, and Other Units

JAN/FEB 2017 THE MUSTANG LARIAT LDO AND CWO NEWSLETTER. Head OCM s Corner: First of all Congrats to the new LDO (274) and CWO (196) Selects.

PART A BILLET AND OFFICER DESIGNATOR CODES

From: Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet Commander, Naval Surface Force Atlantic

THROUGH: CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF ACTING UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (PERSONNEL AND READINESS)

OPNAVINST C N2 18 Feb 09

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2010 BUDGET ESTIMATES

Subj: QUALIFICATION AND ASSIGNMENT OF PERSONNEL IN THE NAVAL NUCLEAR PROPULSION PROGRAM

The Mustang Lariat. April LDO/CWO Officer Community Managers Newsletter. FY-15 In-service Procurement Board statistics:

SWO(N) COMMUNITY BRIEF

CAPT Rick Cheeseman Director, Surface Officer Assignments PERS-41

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2017 BUDGET ESTIMATES JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES FEBRUARY 2016 RESERVE PERSONNEL, MARINE CORPS

PRE-DECISIONAL INTERNAL EXECUTIVE BRANCH DRAFT

RP CAREER PATH (SW) COMMISSIONING OR OTHER SPECIAL PROGRAMS

Air Force ROTC Overview

Systems Engineering & LRASM

waivers, must have final approval prior to this date.

Mission Develop, deliver, and support aviation training necessary to meet validated Fleet. Sailors and Marines

Subj: REQUIRED OPERATIONAL CAPABILITIES AND PROJECTED OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FOR NAVY PUBLIC AFFAIRS SUPPORT ELEMENT

MILPER Message Number Proponent RCHS-AN

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF TRAINING AIR WINGS

1. Purpose: To provide information on the results of the FY13 Career Management Field (CMF) 11 selection list to Master Sergeant.

Chapter 24 Current Squadron Lineage

Career Management (PERS-4) Career Development Symposium September 2017

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL THESIS

2. Background OPNAV INSTRUCTION From: Chief of Naval Operations. Subj: DEPLOYMENT HEALTH ASSESSMENT (DHA) PROCESS

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS FINAL DECISION

MILPERSMAN PERS-92 Phone: DSN COM FAX (901) NAVPERSCOM CUSTOMER SERVICE Phone: Toll Free U ASK NPC

Subj: COMMANDER, NAVY RESERVE FORCE CAREER COUNSELOR OF THE YEAR PROGRAM

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

1. What will I do in the Navy Civil Engineer Corps? 2. What is a Construction/Contract Management job like? 3. What is a Public Works job like?

Transcription:

FY-15 Aviation CDR Command Selection Board Lessons Learned

Purpose Provide feedback from the FY-15 ACSB Provide Aviation Leadership with a tool to mentor Junior Officers 2

Active Component 3

AC Selection Overview URL O-5 Initial Command Selects: 521 total 13xx URL records (SG-00/01) Operational: (12 SG-00, 69 SG-01) 81 OP-T: (SG-00) 27 119 URL Test (SG-98/99/00) 1 Special Mission: (SG-00): 10 AEDO Test Selects: 2 Bonus Cmd Selects: 9 LDO Cmd Selects: (includes SM) 6 AMDO Cmd Equiv: (includes Bonus) 7 143 4

AC URL DH FITREPs 280/521 = #1 DH 53.7% All 119 URL selects were #1 DHs 161 #1 DHs not selected SG 00 107/225 = #1 DH 47.5% 50/107 selected OP, OP-T, SM, or TEST 46.7% Avg ticket length: OP only 7.5mos All Selects 6.8mos Last look for SG-00, final overall rate: 41.6% SG 01 173/296 = #1 DH 58.4% 69/173 selected OP 39.9% Avg. ticket length 10.5 mos Competition for Command is fierce! 5

Test Command Eligible VX-23 (VAQ, VF, VFA): 1/19 selected 5.3% VX-30 (VAW, VP, VS, VQ(P), VQ(T)): 1/8 selected 12.5% Test Pilot School (All helo communities): 1/5 selected 20.0% Superior performance in Critical Acquisition Community and Fleet Billets are Key! 6

LDO COMMAND 6/24 selected (25.0%) Superior Performance in O-4 Pinnacle tour FY15 ACSB selected 3 CAGMOs, 1 CVN IM1, 1 Mobile Tactical Operations Center (MTOC), 1 Handler Significant career diversity: O/I level GSA, overseas CVN/CVW and Major Staff assignments Education 83% of those selected had bachelor degree 33% of those selected had masters degree Increasing scope of responsibility w/in large organizations w/competitive break-out 7

AMDO Command Equivalent 6/33 selected for Initial Cmd (Equiv) 18.2% 1/18 selected for Bonus Cmd (Equiv) 5.6% Initial Command: LCDR sea tour was major discriminator CAGMO, CVN IM-1, L-Class AIMDO, Overseas AIMD OIC, Sqdn AMO General: Sustained superior performance in tough jobs If able, hard FITREP break-outs carry the day Trait averages and soft break-outs are critical AMDO value experience, quals, diverse tours 8

% OF SELECTS SELECT RATE ELIGIBLE AC URL Diversity (SG-00/01) 428/521 = non-diverse 82.1% 76/521 = diverse 14.6% 17/521 = female 3.3% 105/428 = non-diverse 24.5% 12/76 = diverse 15.8% 2/17 = female 11.8% 105/119 = non-diverse 88.2% 12/119 = diverse 10.1% 2/119 = female 1.7% Overall Board Selection Rate = 22.8% 9

AC URL Diversity #1DH (SG-00/01) 105/246 = non-diverse #1DH 42.7% 12/34 = diverse #1DH 35.3% 2/10 = female #1DH 20% Competitive Diverse Records well represented in selected population 10

% OF SELECTS SELECT RATE ELIGIBLE AC 1520/AMDO Diversity 29/51 = non-diverse 48.6% 19/51 = diverse 48.6% 3/51 = female 2.7% 3/29 = non-diverse 10.3% 3/19 = diverse 15.8% 1/3 = female 33.3% 3/7 = non-diverse 42.9% 3/7 = diverse 42.9% 1/7 = female 14.3% Overall Board Selection Rate = 13.7% 11

Reserve Component 12

RC Selection Overview FTS O-5 Initial Command Selects: 103 total records Operational: 8 Special Mission: 1 9/103 (8%) SELRES O-5 Cmd Selects: 29 total 13x5 records Operational: 10/29 (34.4%) 19 FTS/SELRES officers selected 14.4% 13

% OF SELECTS SELECT RATE ELIGIBLE RC Diversity (FTS/SELRES) 124/139 = non-diverse 89.2% 12/139 = diverse 8.6% 3/139 = female 2.2% 18/122 = non-diverse 14.8% 1/122 = diverse 0.8% 0/122 = female 0.0% 18/19 = non-diverse 94.7% 1/19 = diverse 5.2% 0/19 = female 0.0% Overall Board Selection Rate = 15.6% 14

Discriminator Statistics 15

AC URL Selects vs. Non-selects #1 DH Selects #1 DH Non-Selects Total #1 DH: 280 119 42.5% 161 57.5% JPME 113 95% 130 80.7% Major Staff 92 77.3% 95 59% Masters 92 77.3% 115 71.4% CDO/OOD/TAO 90 75.6% 92 57.1% JDA 71 59.7% 96 59.6% FRS 63 52.9% 70 43.5% Overseas 24 20.2% 40 24.8% VX / NAVAIR 10 8.4% 17 10.6% Aide Tour 13 10.9% 14 8.7% IA/GSA/APH 15 12.6% 39 24.2% NSAWC 13 10.9% 8 5% TRACOM 7 5.9% 35 21.7% TPS 5 4.2% 7 4.3% PEP 1 0.8% 4 2.5% 16

AC URL JPME 396/521 = JPME 1 complete 76% 119/521 = Selected 22.8% 113/119 = Selected & JPME 1 complete 95% 6 selects require JPME I before assuming CMD 17

AC URL Joint Duty Assignment 167/521 records with JOINT stamp 32.1% 71/167 = selected 42.5% 71/119 = selects & JOINT 59.7% Selected & Joint duty assignment locations: 12 CJCS 16.9% 59 other 83.1% Future Navy leaders = Joint Qualified Officers 18

IA/GSA/APH Precept provides favorable consideration for those serving on IA/GSA/APH May not be typical of the traditional career path, but are considered vital... GWOT and nation-building skills valued Forward-deployed, arduous duty 122/521 = w/ia/gsa/aph 23.4% 15/122 = selected 12.3% 15/119 = selects served on IA 12.6% IA/GSA/APH does not fix a non-competitive record 19

RC Statistics FTS JPME 60/103 eligibles complete 58.3% 9/9 Selects complete 100% SELRES JPME 13/29 eligibles complete 44.8% 4/10 Selects complete 40.0% FTS Major Staff 43/103 eligibles 41.7% 9/9 Selects 100% FTS #1 Department Head 59/103 eligibles 57.3% 9/9 Selects 100% 20

Lessons Learned 21

Measures of Success Best and Most Fully Qualified Standard Record of sustained superior performance in Operational Environments at sea and ashore War fighting ability and tactical excellence Potential to serve in positions of greater responsibility Department Head performance was the most critical determinant for selection, but overall record counted due to fierce competition (161 #1 DHs not selected) Other Considerations: Break out in first shore and second sea tour, FDNF-overseas tours, Major Staff, Masters, JPME, CDO/OOD Diversity of assignment locations viewed as a positive Photos and PFA matter. Especially in a crunch! Best and Most Fully Qualified Selected for Command 22 22

FITREP Guidelines Long #1 ticket as OPSO/MO or both was a discriminator in selection Larger summary groups/longer tour lengths increase record strength Double-tap EP, especially from different reporting seniors, sent a strong select message to the Board Individual Summary Average matters, especially in high-water FITREP The larger the delta from reporting senior average-the better Resetting of reporting senior GPA, if required, should be thoroughly explained in FITREP Soft and hard breakouts are essential for top ranking officers, lack thereof, sends a negative message to the board FITREP recs for future career milestones are important but a consistent message in a tour and over the officer s career matters more Recs for something other than command (OP-T, SM) sends a clear message to the board-especially on a detaching HW FITREP 23

FITREP Guidelines Documentation of community awards, nominations, qualifications, education, and IA/GSA are essential and should be included in a FITREP, this is more effective than a letter to the board. Explain unusual circumstances in the FITREP Perceived decliner due to promotion Early roller for an Aide billet, hard fill job, etc. Again, more effective than a letter to the board. Block 41-use as much space as needed Efficiently/effectively communicate to the board Some white space is OK Use intro/conclusion to communicate individual soft/hard breakouts, make recommendations for promotions, and recommend for future career milestones (OP CMD, OP DH, MAJ CMD, CAG, CVN) 24

Letters to the Board A well written FITREP will preclude the need for a letter to the board (LTB) Most effective letters to Board explain a poorly written, incomplete or future FITREP: Explain extraordinary situations Highlight undocumented achievements Early pull for a Flag Aide, hard fill or transition Least effective letter: Great Officer Must Pick LTBs can draw undue attention to a weakness (e.g., Timing forced me to roll him two days before a COC ) Risk: letter may draw attention to a weakness 25

Officer Records Officers must routinely review their records Notification to eligibles reduced missing info significantly (>1300 pieces of correspondence received for the FY15 ACSB) Community Detailer/Assistant Recorder reviews are a courtesy only Most common problems with records: Missing/gapped FITREPs Missing awards/citations Missing quals (CDO U/W, etc.) Missing advanced education degrees Missing/bad in-grade photos (grooming standards/poor uniform/bad quality photo destracted from the record) Missing or inconsistent PRIMS/PFA data coupled with a missing or old photo, this leaves the board guessing. All Fleet aviators must understand that board correspondence does not go into their permanent record (except officer photos) It is your record. Keep it up to date! 26

Command Qualification CNO directed, first year of implementation Comply with prerequisites for command per: OPNAVINST 1412.14 CNAP/CNAL/NAVAIR/CNAFRINST 1412.2 CNAP-CNAL 1412.3 Includes Oral Board Grandfathered 4 JUNE 2013 Officer must have completed Aviation DH tour before this date Those that failed or declined oral board were not eligible 19 total for FY 15 ACSB (19/521=3.6%)

Questions