JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports 2013;11(8) 23-37

Similar documents
Master of Clinical Science

The influence of workplace culture on nurses learning experiences: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence.

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports 2013;11(12) 81-93

Effectiveness and safety of intravenous therapy at home for children and adolescents with acute and chronic illnesses: a systematic review protocol

Assessing competence during professional experience placements for undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review

Systematic Review. Request for Proposal. Grant Funding Opportunity for DNP students at UMDNJ-SN

Effectiveness of interventions for the development of leadership skills among nurses: a systematic review protocol

The effectiveness of educational programs in promoting nurses knowledge of pressure ulcers: a systematic review protocol

Effectiveness of respiratory rates in determining clinical deterioration: a systematic review protocol

The effectiveness of culturally-focused interventions in increasing satisfaction of hospitalized adult Asian patients: a systematic review protocol

The Experiences of Mental Health Professionals and. Patients in the use of Pro Re Nata Medication in Acute

Nurse Led Follow Up: Is It The Best Way Forward for Post- Operative Endometriosis Patients?

A systematic review of the literature: executive summary

Systematic Review Search Strategy

Version 1.0 (posted Aug ) Aaron L. Leppin. Background. Introduction

Nursing skill mix and staffing levels for safe patient care

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports 2013;11(8) 84-96

Carers experiences when the person they have been caring for enters a residential aged care facility permanently: A systematic review

Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual

Master of Clinical Science

Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing

inappropriate referrals to secondary care: our experiences with the ENT Emergency clinic

KNOWLEDGE SYNTHESIS: Literature Searches and Beyond

A Systematic Review of the Liaison Nurse Role on Patient s Outcomes after Intensive Care Unit Discharge

Written and verbal information versus verbal information only for patients being discharged from acute hospital settings to home: systematic review

Health Professionals Perceptions and Experiences of Open Disclosure: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.

PICO Question: Considering the lack of access to health care in the pediatric population would

Text-based Document. Effectiveness of Educational Interventions on the Research Literacy of Post-Registration Nurses: A Systematic Review

The effectiveness of strategies and interventions that aim to assist the transition from student to newly qualified nurse

Disposable, Non-Sterile Gloves for Minor Surgical Procedures: A Review of Clinical Evidence

Telephone triage systems in UK general practice:

Summary Job Description Nurse Practitioner

A systematic review to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth

Technology Overview. Issue 13 August A Clinical and Economic Review of Telephone Triage Services and Survey of Canadian Call Centre Programs

Yost et al. Implementation Science DOI /s Implementation Science

A Delphi study to determine nursing research priorities in. the North Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust and the corresponding evidence base

Reviewers. Review question/objective. Background. Page 1. Sherryl Gaston RN BN AFAAQHC CF-JBI 1

The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes

JBI Database and Your Journals on Ovid

COMMISSIONING SUPPORT PROGRAMME. Standard operating procedure

Reducing Attendances and Waits in Emergency Departments A systematic review of present innovations

PCNE WS 4 Fuengirola: Development of a COS for interventions to optimize the medication use of people discharged from hospital.

This article is Part 1 of a two-part series designed. Evidenced-Based Case Management Practice, Part 1. The Systematic Review

Short Report How to do a Scoping Exercise: Continuity of Care Kathryn Ehrich, Senior Researcher/Consultant, Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.

Identification and nursing management of dysphagia in individuals with acute neurological impairment: a systematic review protocol

Quality care outcomes following transitional care interventions for older people from hospital to home: a systematic review

Programme specification: BSc (Hons) Nursing Studies KEY FACTS

Shoulder program of care. reference guide OCTOBER 2012

A Comparison of Job Responsibility and Activities between Registered Dietitians with a Bachelor's Degree and Those with a Master's Degree

Essential Skills for Evidence-based Practice: Evidence Access Tools

JOB DESCRIPTION. Consultant Physician, sub-specialty in Gastroenterology REPORTING TO: HEAD OF DEPARTMENT - FOR ALL CLINICAL MATTERS

Rapid Review Evidence Summary: Manual Double Checking August 2017

Intermediate care. Appendix C3: Economic report

Burden of MRSA Colonization in Elderly Residents of Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Family Involvement in Decision Making for People with Dementia in Residential Aged. Care: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Literature

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL

Level 1: Introduction to Evidence-Informed Practice

PHYSIOTHERAPY PRESCRIBING BETTER HEALTH FOR AUSTRALIA

Abstract of the dissertation entitled. The Use of a Nurse-led Education Program in Reducing Pediatric Eczema. Submitted by.

SMO Gastroenterology and General Medicine Position Description

Perspectives on Nurse Practitioner/Advanced Practice Nursing in the USA-2012 Update

National Cancer Action Team. National Cancer Peer Review Programme EVIDENCE GUIDE FOR: Colorectal MDT. Version 1

Objectives. Preparing Practice Scholars: Implementing Research in the DNP Curriculum. Introduction

THE USE OF SMARTPHONES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Guideline: Expanded practice for Registered Nurses

Foundations for the Future: The Leadership of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners Over the Decades

Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool MMAT

Evidence based practice: Colorectal cancer nursing perspective

Delivering surgical services: options for maximising resources

Washington State Council of Perioperative Nurses October 14, 2011 Janet G. Schnall, MS, AHIP HEAL-WA University of Washington Health Sciences

HEALTH CARE HOME ASSESSMENT (HCH-A)

Supporting revalidation: methods and evidence

Title:The impact of physician-nurse task-shifting in primary care on the course of disease: a systematic review

Evi Matthys * , Roy Remmen and Peter Van Bogaert

Achieving the objectives and carrying out the key responsibilities and duties as described.

Evidence Tables and References 6.4 Discharge Planning Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care Update

POSITION DESCRIPTION Registered Nurse (Grade 2) Gynaecology/Oncology & High Dependency Unit

Scottish Infection Research Network - Chief Scientist Office. Doctoral Fellowship in Healthcare Associated Infection

Uptake of Medicare chronic disease items in Australia by general practice nurses and Aboriginal health workers

Building & Strengthening Your Evidence Based Practice Literature Searches

NATIONWIDE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL / COLUMBUS, OHIO ADVANCED PRACTICE REGISTERED NURSE STANDARD CARE ARRANGEMENT (SCA)

Advanced Roles and Workforce Planning. Sara Dalby SFA, ANP, SCP Associate Lecturer Winston Churchill Fellow

Evidence-Based Practice Pulling the pieces together. Lynette Savage, RN, PhD, COI March 2017

JOB DESCRIPTION. Psychiatrist REPORTING TO: CLINICAL DIRECTOR - FOR ALL CLINICAL MATTERS SERVICE MANAGER FOR ALL ADMIN MATTERS DATE: APRIL 2017

Advancing professional health care practice and the issue of accountability

Medical day hospital care for older people versus alternative forms of care (Review)

SMO ORTHOPAEDICS - Spine Position Description

Newborn bloodspot screening

JOB DESCRIPTION Emergency Nurse Practitioner (ENP) / Advanced Nurse Practitioner (ANP) / Emergency Care Practitioner (ECP) Urgent Care Centre (UCC)

The University of North Carolina Wilmington PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT COMPETENCY PROFILE

Improving General Practice for the People of West Cheshire

Global Healthcare Accreditation Standards Brief 4.0

Experiences of Registered Nurses as Managers and Leaders in Residential Aged Care Facilities

How to Find and Evaluate Pertinent Research. Levels and Types of Research Evidence

The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes. A guide from NatPaCT

D.N.P. Program in Nursing. Handbook for Students. Rutgers College of Nursing

ADVANCED NURSE PRACTITIONER STRATEGY

Discharge Planning in Chronic Conditions: An Evidence-Based Analysis

Final scope for the systematic review of the clinical and cost effectiveness evidence for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)

British Society for Surgery of the Hand. (BSSH) Evidence for Surgical

Transcription:

Effectiveness of nurse-led clinics on service delivery and clinical outcomes in adults with chronic ear, nose and throat complaints: a systematic review protocol Caroline Whiteford, Clinical Service Coordinator, Royal Adelaide Hospital and Master of Clinical Science candidate 1, 2 Sarahlouise White, BSc (Hons), MSClinSci, PhD, Research Fellow 2 Matthew Stephenson, BBiotech (Hons), PhD, Research Fellow 2 1 Surgical Specialties Outpatients, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, 2 School of Translational Health Science, Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005 Corresponding author: Caroline Whiteford carolinewhiteford@healthsagovau Review question/objective This systematic review aims to examine the effectiveness of nurse-led ear, nose and throat (ENT) clinics on service delivery and clinical outcomes More specifically, the objectives are to identify the effectiveness of nurse-led clinics in improving patient satisfaction, expanding nurse roles, and improving efficiency of services for patients, including improving waiting times and holistic care A secondary objective of this review is to examine the evidence on the cost effectiveness of nurse-led ENT clinics Background ENT complaints, whilst very common, are rarely life threatening but can cause significant discomfort and disruption to many patients lives Many of the conditions encountered are chronic and cannot be easily managed and accommodated by general practitioners (GPs) in the community This is likely to be due to factors such as time constraints as these patients often need longer than a standard consultation In addition, GPs often do not have the specialized equipment or education that is required to diagnose or treat ENT disorders 1 and therefore refer patients to tertiary institutions for ongoing treatment such as aural care This increases the number of referrals to hospitals, which ultimately leads to longer non-urgent booking queues and longer waiting times for patients seeking treatment Teamed with this is the current trend in health care to make better use of limited resources while still delivering high quality care within clinically acceptable timeframes 2 and tighter budgets 3 Page23

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports 2013;11(8) 23-37 In response to the increased need for more specialized ENT services, nurse-led clinics have begun to emerge to treat patients with chronic and ongoing conditions of the ear, nose and throat 1, 4 Nurses with specialized training in these clinics provide an educative role to patients to promote health, provide psychological assistance and support, monitor the patient s condition, involve patients in their own care, and perform nursing interventions as necessary - essentially holistic nursing care 1 Numerous studies highlight the lack of otolaryngology (ENT) teaching in GP training and suggest that a lot of the knowledge GPs rely on they have attained as medical students, which is often inadequate in managing complex ENT issues 1 Nurses with specialized ENT training can facilitate training of GPs and community nurses by running study sessions and providing ongoing support thereby improving professional relationships between tertiary and primary healthcare settings The effectiveness of nurse-led clinics from a patient satisfaction perspective was demonstrated well in some of the studies identified 5,6,7 Data reported in such studies indicates that patients satisfaction was linked strongly in nurse-led clinics to aspects of care and service delivery such as shorter waiting times for first attendance, better communication, more advice on health care, self-care and management, and follow-up care The therapeutic relationship between nurses and patients can be pivotal to patient compliance to treatment and trust/belief in care pathways Nurses often possess better listening or counseling skills than doctors and can spend more time communicating with patients 8 This creates a more relaxed and empathetic atmosphere and encourages patients to communicate more openly As there is a more holistic view taken by the nurse to the patient s issues this in turn improves relationships and satisfaction with care This can lead to clues to improved and timelier diagnosis and treatment of patient issues From a medical workload point of view, studies have shown that nurse-led clinics have been an effective solution to patient waiting times and have allowed junior medical staff more time to attend to more complex patient care such as clinical issues in ward environments, admission assessments in the emergency department and surgical training in the operating theatre 9,2,10 Patient waiting times were decreased due to the nurse s ability to share the workload of the medical staff and service delivery was improved Senior nurses working in nurse-led clinics also have the ability to appropriately triage referrals from outside sources, such as GPs, and see and treat these patients in a more timely manner therefore decreasing waiting times and taking some burden from the medical workload These outcomes have strengthened the case for increasing the number and variety of nurse-led clinics and demonstrate their effectiveness in the current health system, which is overburdened with patients seeking ongoing treatment as the population ages and longer durations of treatment are necessary Expanding nursing roles could have measurable cost benefits to the health system by reducing health costs 11,12,3 The replacement of medical staff with nursing staff allows medical staff more time to attend to more complex cases There is often more flexibility in the nurse s timetable to see patients more rapidly if the patient is experiencing problems, which would otherwise have caused the patient a visit to a hospital emergency department or a GP These activities carry a cost that can be avoided by the health system by creating quicker access to specialized healthcare Nurses in the nurse-led clinics also have a unique ability to educate patients in ear care and can provide longer consultation times than medical staff 11 The benefit of this educative, counseling role is that patients have a better understanding of how to manage their condition more appropriately and can help to prevent chronic conditions becoming acute episodes of care that require more expensive and intensive workloads from Page24

medical staff Often patients have better compliance to treatment and are monitored more closely in nurse-led clinics 8 Nurse-led clinics are also an effective environment for nurses to feel more valued in their roles The recognition of the nurses expertise within a multidisciplinary team enhances the professional profile of nurses and reduces the stigma of nurses being little more than handmaidens to medical staff 13 Nurses with specialized training are recognized for their skills and expertise and are in positions now where they are responsible for teaching and training junior medical staff 1 For the purpose of this systematic review I am interested in nurse-led clinics lead by registered nurses with advanced skills From an international perspective the definition of a nurse with specialized qualifications uses different terminology The Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia define a nurse practitioner as a registered nurse who is educated and endorsed to function autonomously and collaboratively in an advanced and extended clinical role 14 It also describes advanced practice nursing (APN) as a term used to define a level of nursing practice that uses comprehensive skills, experience and knowledge in nursing care 15 The Royal College of Nursing, United Kingdom (UK) has published a policy statement that states that from an international and European literature search they would define advanced nursing practice as a level of practice rather than a job title and they use competency based training to attain that level 16 From a literature search, a document published by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing Advisory Committee and the APRN Consensus Work Group, United States of America, defines an advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) as a nurse who has completed an accredited graduate-level education program, passes a national certification examination, acquired advanced clinical knowledge and skills to provide direct care to patients, assumes responsibility and accountability for diagnosis and management of patients and has attained a license to practice in one of four APRN roles These roles are certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA), certified nurse midwife (CNM), clinical nurse specialist (CNS) or certified nurse practitioner (CNP) 17 A preliminary search of the Joanna Briggs Library of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PubMed and PROSPERO has revealed that there is not currently a systematic review (either published or underway) on this topic This systematic review aims to identify the effectiveness of nurse-led ENT clinics and will highlight benefits of nurse-led care to patients with chronic ongoing ENT complaints Cost information will also be extracted from included studies and synthesized; however the conduct of a cost benefit analysis is not the primary focus of the review Keywords Nurse; nursing; nurse practitioner; advanced nursing; nurse specialist;, ear; nose; throat; cost; patient; satisfaction; effectiveness; service; adult; chronic; acute Inclusion criteria Types of participants This review will consider studies that include adult patients, aged 18 years and older, attending ear, nose and throat clinics, regardless of complaint Page25

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports 2013;11(8) 23-37 Types of intervention(s) This review will consider studies that evaluate nurse-led care in general practice and acute care in which the nurse was identified as taking a lead role in the care of patients with chronic ear, nose and throat complaints There are many permutations of nurse-led care from the nurse performing simple organizational tasks to the nurse directing the clinical care of patients For the purposes of this review, the nurse-led care of interest should be performed by registered nurses employed within the primary care facility or outpatient clinic and also ENT nurse practitioners Types of comparator The comparator will be general practitioner-led or ENT consultant-led care Types of outcomes The outcomes of interest in this systematic review will fall into three categories: service delivery outcomes, clinical and health outcomes, and financial outcomes Service delivery outcomes: including surveys of patient satisfaction and levels of patient education, waiting times, booking queues Clinical and health outcomes: including treatment times, treatment duration, course of treatment, self-treatment influencing change in presentation to clinic episodes, reinfection rates, treatment, prevention and cure, representation of patients at the clinic for the same complaint data Financial outcomes: including differences in costing, nurse-led clinic versus medical-led clinic where reported in relation to effectiveness measures Types of studies To evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led ENT clinics this review will consider randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as the study design of choice, however any relevant quantitative study design will be considered For the economic component of the review all economic evaluations of nurse-led ENT clinics will be considered Search strategy The search strategy aims to find both published and unpublished studies A three-step search strategy will be utilized in this review An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL will be undertaken followed by analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract, and of the index terms used to describe articles A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases Thirdly, the reference list of all identified reports and articles will be Page26

searched for additional studies Studies published in the English language will be considered for inclusion in this review Studies published from January 1980 to May 2013 will be considered for inclusion in this review The early 1980s were when nurse-led clinics were generally accepted and became a widely available option for patient treatment and care 4 The databases to be searched include: PubMed Cinahl Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) Scopus Embase The search for unpublished studies will include: MedNar ProQuest theses and dissertations Initial keywords: Please refer to the Logic grid in Appendix I Assessment of methodological quality Quantitative papers selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) (Appendix II) Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer Economic papers selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardized critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Analysis of Cost, Technology and Utilization Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-ACTUARI) (Appendix III) Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer Data collection Quantitative data will be extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI-MAStARI (Appendix IV) The data extracted will include specific details about the interventions, populations, study methods and outcomes of significance to the review question and specific objectives Economic data will be extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI-ACTUARI (Appendix V) The data extracted will include specific details about the interventions, populations, study methods and outcomes of significance to the review question and specific objectives Page27

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports 2013;11(8) 23-37 Data synthesis Quantitative papers, where possible, will be pooled in statistical meta-analysis using the JBI-MAStARI software All results will be subjected to double data entry to minimize the risk of error during the data entry Where appropriate, relative risks and/or odds ratios and their associated 95% confidence interval will be calculated for analysis of categorical data For continuous data that were collected using the same scale, the weighted mean differences (WMD) and standard deviation will be calculated; for data collected using different scales, the standardized mean differences (SMD) will be calculated Heterogeneity will be assessed using standard Chi square test and if found will be investigated prior to any further analysis Where appropriate, meta-analysis will be conducted using JBI MAStARI Where statistical pooling is not possible, the findings will be presented in narrative form Economic findings will, where possible, be pooled using JBI-ACTUARI and presented in a tabular summary Where this is not possible, findings will be presented in narrative form Conflicts of interest None to declare Acknowledgement As this systematic review forms partial submission for the degree award of the Masters of Clinical Science, a secondary reviewer (Kate Davis, MSc candidate) will be utilized for critical appraisal only Page28

References 1 Harkin H A nurse-led ear care clinic: sharing knowledge and improving patient care British Journal of Nursing 2005;14(5):250-254 2 Mylvaganam S, Patodi R, Campbell J B, The ENT emergency clinic: a prospective audit to improve effectiveness of an established service The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2009; 123:229-233 3 Uppal S, Jose J, Banks P, et alcost-effective analysis of conventional and nurse-led clinics for common otological procedures The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2004; 118:189-192 4 Hatchett R Nurse-led Clinics:Practical issues Routledge2003 5 Shakeel M,Newton JR,Clark D,Hussain A,Patients Satisfaction with the Nurse-Led Aural Care Clinic J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008;20 (3):81-83 6 Wong Frances KY Chung Loretta CY Establishing a definition for a nurse-led clinic: structure,process, and outcome Nursing And Healthcare Management And Policy 2006;358-369 7 Horrocks S, Anderson E,Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors BMJ 2002;324:819 8 Robertson S, Maxwell C, McGarry GW,et al, A nurse-led snoring clinic:how we do it Clinical Otolayrngology 2009;34 158-164 9 Seeley M,Scott Stevenson D, Waste not,want not : making better use of house officers in the Otolaryngology Department at Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand The New Zealand Medical Journal2009;122(1292):44-49 10 Koay CB,Marks NJ,A nurse-led preadmission clinic for elective ENT surgery:the first 8 monthsann R Coll Surg Engl 1996;78: 15-19 11 Fall M,Walters S,Read S,et al An evaluation of a nurse-led ear care service in primary care: benefits and costs British Journal of General Practice 1997:47, 699-703 12 Haque S, Hashmi S,Prinsley P,Impact of ENT Follow-Up After Myringotomy And Grommet InsertionThe West London Medical Journal Vol 1 No 2 51-59 13 Billings K, Campbell J, Bradley S, The nurse practitioner within an ENT service: Evolution or revolution? The Auricle Royal College of Nursing Winter 2008/09 4-5 14 Guidelines on endorsement as a Nurse Practitioner, Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council (ANMC) 20061-2 15 Fact sheet on advanced practice nursing, Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia, May 2013 16 Policy Statement RCN s position on advanced nursing practice, Royal College of Nursing 2007;1-2 17 Consensus Model for APRN Regulation: Licensure, Accreditation, Certification and Education, APRN Joint Dialogue Group Report, 2008; 3-24 Page29

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports 2013;11(8) 23-37 Appendix I: Logic grid of initial search terms to be adapted to each database as necessary Nurse led clinic ENT Effectiveness Nurse led nurse s practice patterns nurse practitioner nurse practitioners nurse specialist advanced practice nurse advanced practice nursing nurse led clinic Ear diseases ear disease ear disorder otologic disease hearing disorder hearing loss ear infection earache otitis ear inflammation aural care grommet nose nasal sinus sinusitis throat tonsil tonsilitis epistaxis nasal polyp doctor consultant acute chronic Costs Hospital outpatient staff waiting time patient satisfaction booking compliance education Page30

Appendix II: MAStARI critical appraisal instruments Insert page break Page31

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports 2013;11(8) 23-37 Page32

Appendix III: ACTUARI critical appraisal instrument Page33

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports 2013;11(8) 23-37 Appendix IV: MAStARI Data extraction instrument Insert page break Page34

Page35

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports 2013;11(8) 23-37 Appendix V: ACTUARI data extraction instrument Page36

Page37