NCHRP Synthesis 20-05/Topic 47-16: Highway Worker Safety

Similar documents
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

An Overview of National Transportation Research

Vice President & Corporate Bridge Engineer Arora and Associates, P.C.

Transportation Management Plan Overview

ATSSA Update AASHTO Committee on Safety

Policy 5.18 TRAFFIC CRASHES AND OTHER ROAD HAZARDS

Developing CMFs. Study Types and Potential Biases. Frank Gross VHB

Transportation Library Connectivity and Development

MPC-399 Time Duration

Bureau of Indian Affairs Indian Highway Safety Program

August AASHTO Update. King W. Gee Director, Engineering and Technical Services AASHTO W W W. T R A N S P O R T A T I O N.

OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH IN KENTUCKY, 2012

AASHTO s Highway Safety Manual: Quantification of Highway Safety. Priscilla Tobias, PE Illinois Department of Transportation State Safety Engineer

STATE DOT ADMINISTRATION

Health Authority Abu Dhabi Occupational and Environmental Health Section & The Safety in the Heat Programme

1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient s Catalog No.

OSHA Recommendations for Workplace Violence Prevention Programs in Late-Night Retail Establishments. What Is Workplace Violence? Workplace Violence

Employee Injury Procedures

SNOW HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT

Expediting Project Delivery Webinar - Streamlining Decision Making in Project Delivery

Using Railroad-DOT Mitigation Strategies SHRP2 Case Study

Connected and Automated Vehicles. September 13, 2017 STSMO Annual Meeting Rapid City, SD

NCHRP Research Update Bridge Maintenance. Research Update to Bridge Technical Working Group AASHTO SCOM Meeting July 2016

FHWA SAFETY UPDATE. Michael Griffith Director, Office of Safety Technologies

Overview. History. History cont d. Safety Circuit Riders: Where are they, what do they do? MINK /24/15

Maine-New Hampshire Traffic Incident Management Committee

The Advanced Traffic Incident Management System (TIMS) Stepping up our game. Kevin E. Comstock; Traffic Management Office Program Manager

ATTACHMENT G-1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE CONSISTENCY SELF-CERTIFICATION FORM

MEMORANDUM. An individual is limited to one deduction of $3,000. If a taxpayer and spouse both qualify, deduct $6,000.

WISCONSIN TRAFFIC OPERATIONS & SAFETY LABORATORY

TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN ANNEX R EARTHQUAKE & TSUNAMI

IMPERIAL COUNTY CLASS TITLE: SENIOR ENGINEER - PUBLIC WORKS (OPTION CLASS)

Guidance for Safety Management at the Local Level

Occupant Protection. Problem Identification. U.S. vs. Washington Traffic Fatality Rates

Consensus Study Report

May 2, Ms. Mary E. Peters Administrator Federal Highway Administration Room th Street, SW Washington, D.C

SMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.

National Law Enforcement Challenge

VIOLENCE: AN OSHA PERSPECTIVE FROM THE OFFICE OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE AND NURSING

Proposal for Better Aligning Block Groups & TAZs

SPR2 Program Manual. Third Edition New Hampshire Department of Transportation State Planning and Research Part 2 Program

This Annex describes the emergency medical service protocol to guide and coordinate actions during initial mass casualty medical response activities.

Legislative References. Navajo Partnering Meeting June 18, Flagstaff, Arizona. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)

Florida Impaired Driving Coalition Impaired Driving Strategic Plan Action Plan

Behavior. Programs. Safety. December Research. lives, guidance, unsafe behaviors. However, problem. administration.

GAO HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Further Efforts Needed to Address Data Limitations and Better Align Funding with States Top Safety Priorities

Renville County, Minnesota Strategic Plan

National EMS Advisory Council Recommendations. Recommendation. Safety Committee

Drunk Driving Fatalities IN AMERICA

Governors Highway Safety Association. Sample Position Descriptions

Meeting Location SCDOT ITS Bldg (1408 Shop Road Columbia, SC 29201) Meeting Minutes Nov. 13, 2014 (900 hrs hrs.)

INCIDENT COMMAND SYSTEM NATIONAL TRAINING CURRICULUM HISTORY OF ICS. October 1994

Funding Safe Routes to School in California

MANDAN FIRE DEPARTMENT STANDARD OPERATION PROCEDURES

Emergency Operations Plan

Overview of Local Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)

ADAMS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

Welcome to today s webinar:

NFPA 1001 Text from 2008 Edition

National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors Research Institute

Integrated Emergency Plan. Overview

Concurrent Session 6.4 Day 3 Thursday May 10 th, :05 5:30pm

Milwaukee Co. Sheriff Dept. Initiative. Southeast Wisconsin Multi-Jurisdictional OWI Task Force. Original Participating Agencies 9/11/2013

Florida Online Job Ads Seasonally Adjusted. May 10. May 11. May 12. Nov 09. Nov 11. Nov 10

6. HIGHWAY FUNDING Introduction Local Funding Sources Property Tax Revenues valuation County Transportation Excise Tax

Funding Sources for Transportation Research Competitive Programs

Highway Patrol Division

Occupant Protection: Problem Identification

Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements. AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

NLTAPA Region IV Meeting St. Augustine, FL May 13, 2014

Incentive Grants for the States Webinar

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

Louisiana State Police Troop C

Idaho Statewide Implementation Strategy for the National Fire Plan

Using IDOT s Traffic Crash Report data in Motor Vehicle Injury Surveillance. Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC)

FLORIDA DID NOT ALWAYS VERIFY CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED DURING SURVEYS OF NURSING HOMES PARTICIPATING IN MEDICARE AND MEDICAID

SACRAMENTO COUNTY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL OPERATIONAL REVIEW Voter Registration and Elections DEPARTMENT

SEP Memorandum Report: "Trends in Nursing Home Deficiencies and Complaints," OEI

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF STATE PERSONNEL 1331 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina August 16, 2012

NAPA Overview. Dan Gallagher, Chairman National Asphalt Pavement Association 2017 WAPAConference

STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER VEHICLE PURSUIT SUBJECT

San Francisco Cannabis State Legalization Task Force Year II Retail Licensing FINAL Task Force Recommendations

Public Health Accreditation Board STANDARDS. Measures VERSION 1.0 APPLICATION PERIOD 2011-JULY 2014 APPROVED MAY 2011

Intro to - IS700 National Incident Management System Aka - NIMS

Quality Improvement Work Plan

2012 Client-Level Data Analysis Webinar

ACC Environmental Legal Quick Hit Webinar

UNESCAP. 1. Introduction 2. Target Road Safety Facility 3. Guideline/Manual for RSF 4. Survey Design and Application Plan 5. Discussion and Remark

About TRB Annual Meeting Calendar Committees & Panels Programs Projects Publications Resources & Databases

Chapter 15. Occupational Safety and Health. Statutory Basis 1/12/2009. Employment Law for Business, 6 th ed. Bennett-Alexander

SACRAMENTO REGION, CALIFORNIA:

Traffic Enforcement. Audit Report. August City of Austin Office of the City Auditor

Iowa State University Center for Survey Statistics & Methodology Union of Concerned Scientists Survey of Federal Scientists 2018

Cost of Auto-versus-Pedestrian Injuries San Francisco,

ODOT RD&T MANUAL OF PROCEDURES

Section I Referenced Publications. ANSI/IES-RP American National Standards Institute and Illuminating Engineering Society standard

NCHRP Leveraging Resources for Better Transportation

APPENDIX 1 STAFF AND CONTRACTORS INDUCTION MANUAL FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE BUND REALIGNMENT

Selected Aspects of the Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program. Department of Transportation

Transcription:

NCHRP Synthesis 20-05/Topic 47-16: Highway Worker Safety

NCHRP is a State-Driven Program Sponsored by individual state DOTs who Suggest research of national interest Serve on oversight panels that guide the research. Administered by TRB in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration.

Practical, ready-to-use results Applied research aimed at state DOT practitioners Often become AASHTO standards, specifications, guides, syntheses Can be applied in planning, design, construction, operations, maintenance, safety, environment

Today s Speakers John Gambatese, PhD, PE(CA) NCHRP Synthesis 20-05/Topic 47-16: Highway Worker Safety David S. Hurwitz, PhD, Title of Presentation NCHRP Synthesis 20-05/Topic 47-16: Highway Worker Safety Keith Robinson, PLA

NCHRP Synthesis 20-05/Topic 47-16: Highway Worker Safety Presented by: John Gambatese, PhD, PE(CA) & David S. Hurwitz, PhD School of Civil and Construction Engineering Oregon State University

Introduction Problem Statement Scope and Purpose Key Terminology Introduction Literature Review Research Questions Methods Survey Results Case Studies Conclusions 1

Problem Statement Construction and maintenance of transportation infrastructure Managed or conducted by state DOTs State DOT employees placed in high risk environments Results in injuries and fatalities What are state DOTs doing to prevent injuries and fatalities? How are state DOTs using historical data to develop their safety program elements? 2

Scope and Purpose Review state DOT health and safety practices Better understand state DOT diversity with respect to safety programs Explore the use of data in safety programs 3

Key Terminology Highway worker - An employee of a state DOT who is active in construction or maintenance work sites on state DOT rightof-way. Incident - Any disruption in the normal flow of work involving a highway worker employed by a state DOT in a construction or maintenance site that involves an injury, fatality, property loss, damaged equipment, work stoppage, or near miss. Work site - Any location where construction or maintenance work is being done on state DOT right-of-way. 4

Literature Review Prevalence and causality of highway worker incidents Legal standards and policy recommendations Availability of injury and fatality data Introduction Literature Review Research Questions Methods Survey Results Case Studies Conclusions 5

Prevalence and Causality of Incidents Types of work site incidents Public vehicle On-site vehicle Other on-site hazard 6

Prevalence and Causality of Incidents Types of work site incidents Public vehicle On-site vehicle Other on-site hazard Construction Chart Book (CPWR, 2013) 2010 construction industry statistics 7

Legal Standards and Policy Recommendations Strategic Highway Safety Plans (SHSP) Federal requirement for state DOTs Sections related to work sites Enforcement of existing work zone speed laws Education of public, law enforcement, and first responders Higher visibility of workers and work zones 8

Availability of Safety Data Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP2) 9

Availability of Safety Data Data Set Strengths Limitations BLS OSHA NIOSH Able to separate by state; numerically based data separated by categories Short written description regarding each incident Very detailed reports and specific recommendations Illness and Injury data not well coded to isolate for highway work sites; little known about individual incidents Difficult to search by state Poor geographic diversity and few recent reports for highway work zones FARS Detailed, comprehensive database Cannot isolate highway workers 10 SHRP2 High volume of naturalistic driving information Not as available to non-academic researchers at state DOTs

Research Questions Research Question #1: How do state DOTs respond when an incident with a highway worker occurs on a work site? 11

Research Questions Research Question #2: What is the current state of practice for using data to develop, implement, and evaluate state DOT worker safety programs? 12

Research Questions Research Question #3: How does the size and scope of a state DOT influence the agency s highway worker health and safety programs?? 13

Methods Research Tasks Survey of state DOTs Case studies of selected safety programs Introduction Literature Review Research Questions Methods Survey Results Case Studies Conclusions 14

Survey Method Survey questions developed from research questions Questions coded into Qualtrics software Link to survey questions distributed to members of: North American Association of Transportation Safety and Health Officials (NAATSHO) 15

Survey Results Demographics Incident Reporting Data Collection Data Utilization Introduction Literature Review Research Questions Methods Survey Results Case Studies Conclusions 16

Demographics Frequency of involvement with injury claims and prevention programs Percentage of DOT employees regularly on work sites 17

18 Incident Reporting: DOT response to an incident

Incident Reporting: State DOT Incident Reports Location of Archive Format of Archive 19

Incident Reporting: Near Miss Reporting System 18 of 41 states do not have a near miss reporting system 20

State DOT Data Collection Data set Average Completeness Rating Incident report 4.0 Police citation report 3.9 Worker insurance claim 4.2 Worker annual performance review 3.7 Safety training records 3.6 Contractor safety records 2.9 Medical record 3.3 Fatality/injury data 4.1 Roadway design 3.9 Roadside design features 3.9 21

Data Utilization: Data Driven Safety Programs Policy/Practice Number of Responses Percentage of Responses Additional training for workers 37 90% Additional Training for Supervisors 34 83% New standards for work site traffic control plans 28 68% Driver awareness programs 27 66% Worker behavior assessment programs 13 32% Safety incentive programs 10 24% Drug/alcohol abuse programs 18 44% Other 4 10% None 0 0% 22

Data Utilization: Sharing of Data Organization Number of Responses Percentage of Responses Federal agencies 19 46% Other State DOTs 23 56% County/Municipal governments 7 17% Private Organizations 6 15% Other 10 24% None 9 22% 23

Conclusions Discussion Limitations Future Research Introduction Literature Review Research Questions Methods Survey Results Case Studies Conclusions 24

Discussion Research Question #1: How do state DOTs respond when an incident with a highway worker occurs on a work site? Consistency of response across types of incidents Variability among which steps are used 25

Discussion Research Question #2: What is the current state of practice for using data to develop, implement, and evaluate state DOT worker safety programs? Data sources are often available, but not always used Data sources are often incomplete, making them ineffective 26

Discussion Research Question #3: How does the size and scope of a state DOT influence the agency s highway workers health and safety programs? Structural differences in DOTs might impact their ability to implement certain programs Smaller DOTs were more likely to have the following characteristics Faster access to data A drug/alcohol abuse program 27

Limitations 41 of 50 states responded to the survey Only one information source (e.g., State Safety Officer) for each survey/case study 28

Future Needs Integration of nationally available data sources Establishment of a consistent near miss definition Exploration of a framework to allow quantitative evaluations of safety programs 29

Acknowledgements Funded under NCHRP Topic 47-16 (Highway Worker Safety) for Project 20-05 Zach Barlow, PhD Student, Oregon State University 30

31 Questions?

NCHRP Synthesis 20-05/Topic 47-16: Highway Worker Safety Presented by: David S. Hurwitz, PhD & John Gambatese, PhD, PE(CA) School of Civil and Construction Engineering Oregon State University

Key Terminology Highway worker - An employee of a state DOT who is active in construction or maintenance work sites on state DOT rightof-way. Incident - Any disruption in the normal flow of work involving a highway worker employed by a state DOT in a construction or maintenance site that involves an injury, fatality, property loss, damaged equipment, work stoppage, or near miss. Work site - Any location where construction or maintenance work is being done on state DOT right-of-way. 1

Research Question: Are there examples of current or recent data driven worker safety programs that have been implemented by state DOTs? 2

Methods Research Tasks Survey of state DOTs Case studies of selected safety programs Research Question Methods Survey Results Case Studies Conclusions 3

Survey Results Demographics Incident Reporting Data Collection Data Utilization Research Questions Methods Survey Results Case Studies Conclusions 4

Case Study Methods Follow-up from survey responses Target areas: Potentially innovative safety program Geographical diversity Willingness to participate State Population (2015 est.) Population Rank (2015 est.) California 39,144,818 1 Maine 1,329,328 42 North Dakota 756,927 47 Oregon 4,028,977 27 South Carolina 4,896,146 23 Washington 7,170,351 13 5

Case Study Methods Interview protocol drafted Phone interview with state DOT safety officer Interviewer information combined with survey data and publically accessible information 6

Case Studies 6 case studies conducted CA, ME, ND, OR, SC, WA 4 to be highlighted California North Dakota Oregon Washington Research Question Methods Survey Results Case Studies Conclusions 7

Case Studies Explore details of specific safety programs Actions and strategies Data sources Case Study California Maine North Dakota Oregon South Carolina Washington Safety Program Design for Safety Initiative Safety Idea Incentive Program Leading Indicator Initiative Oregon Work Zone Executive Strategy Steering Committee Work Zone Safety Enforcement Campaign Near Miss Reporting Program 8

California Design for Safety Initiative Data identified hazards State fatality and injury records Roadside Safety Program Guidance Provided to Caltrans Employees Describes objectives of Design for Safety Results in updated standard plans Mitigate safety issues Remove hazards 9

California Caltrans Design for Safety Guardrail Typical Section 10

North Dakota Leading Indicator Initiative Leading vs. Lagging NDDOT s Job Hazard Analysis worksheet Document risks associated with various tasks Risk rating table 11

12 North Dakota

Oregon Oregon Work Zone Executive Strategy Steering Committee (OWZESSC) Established in December of 2013 Partnership between ODOT; Oregon Trucking Association, Inc.; Associated General Contractors, Oregon Columbia Chapter; Oregon State University; American Automobile Association; and the Oregon State Police 4 task forces: Separation and Mobility; Law Enforcement; Engineering Enhancements; Communications Resource Team Group meets semi annual to discuss WZ safety 13 solutions

Washington Near Miss Reporting Program Submit short report of near miss Creation of booklet Implemented statewide 35 reports submitted Small lottery-style monetary incentive 14

Washington Near Miss Booklet 3 x5 to fit in a pocket Instructions for submitting a report Near Miss Definition Near misses describe incidents where no property was damaged and no personal injury sustained, but where, given a slight shift in time or position, damage and/or injury easily could have occurred 15

Washington 16 October 9, 2017

Conclusions Discussion Limitations Future Research Research Question Methods Survey Results Case Studies Conclusions 17

Discussion Research Question: Are there examples of current or recent data driven worker safety programs that have been implemented by state DOTs? Survey highlighted existence of programs Case studies reviewed these programs (varied data use) Leading Indicator Initiative Worker s Memorial Near Miss Program 18

Limitations 41 of 50 states responded to the survey Only 7 willing participants for case studies 19

Acknowledgements Funded under NCHRP Topic 47-16 (Highway Worker Safety) for Project 20-05 Zach Barlow, PhD Student, Oregon State University 20

Questions? david.hurwitz@oregonstate.edu 21