TABLE OF AUTHORITIES * CASES. AT&T v. Iowa Utils. Bd., 525 U.S. 366 (1999) AT&T v. FCC, 487 F.2d 865 (2d Cir. 1973)...31

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT NO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION. OSHRC Docket No

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED. No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

CLINICAL LABORATORY IMPROVEMENT AMENDMENTS OF 1988: HOW TO ASSURE QUALITY LABORATORY SERVICES

Case 1:12-cv ABJ Document 11 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CHAMPIONS CROWNED ON FOX AS 2014 COLLEGE FOOTBALL SCHEDULE UNVEILED

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Case 1:11-cv JEB Document 18 Filed 01/12/12 Page 1 of 61 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv RBW Document 37-1 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv RC Document 41-1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. GenOn Energy Management, LLC ) Docket No. ER REQUEST FOR REHEARING

Case 1:15-cv TSE Document 77-1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 62 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

ARGUED DECEMBER 12, 2016 DECIDED APRIL 11, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

2005 Broadcasters Calendar

BRIEF FOR PETITIONER

Case 1:17-cv RDM Document 69 Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 55 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

United States Court of Appeals

Case 1:17-cv CM Document 20 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:15-cv CKK Document 21 Filed 06/11/15 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources

From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org

STEPHEN M. SHAPIRO, et al., DAVID J. MCMANUS, JR., Chairman, Maryland State Board of Elections, et al.,

Case 1:14-cv JDB Document 36 Filed 03/29/16 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case4:08-cv CW Document25 Filed11/05/08 Page1 of 23

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

2018 NCAA DIVISION I WOMEN'S GOLF REGIONAL SELECTIONS

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 87

July 21, The Honorable Harry Reid 522 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC Dear Senator Reid:

Case 1:12-cv ESH Document 18 Filed 08/16/12 Page 1 of 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Telemedicine and mobile health innovations amid increasing regulatory oversight

Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum

Case 1:17-cv RDM Document 65 Filed 09/22/18 Page 1 of 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Judicial Review of Agency Guidance. Kirsten L. Nathanson Crowell & Moring LLP November 9, 2011

Case 1:12-cv BAH Document Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 94 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Memo WORKPLACE FLEXIBILITY Telecommuting: A Case Study in Public Policy Approaches Spring Georgetown University Law Center

Case 1:12-cv BAH Document 9 Filed 08/09/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Schaghticoke Tribal Nation v. Kent School Corporation Inc.

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 06/05/2017 Page 1 of 48 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED No MILLENNIUM PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.,

LEGAL SERVICES IN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ADVANCING PRODUCTIVE RELATIONSHIPS

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. Petitioners. Respondents

Regional Data Snapshot

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD APRIL 12, 2016] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:15-cv EGS Document 59 Filed 08/18/17 Page 1 of 57 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:08-cv HHK Document 34 Filed 06/05/09 Page 1 of 77 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Operator Training Resource Guide Developed by: ASTSWMO UST Task Force

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Digitization and Aggregation Enabling a Print Network

Case 1:15-cv CRC Document 28 Filed 08/21/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OPINION AND ORDER

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SET. No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Case 1:18-cv TJK Document 7 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

49 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. This matter comes before the Court on the defendants, Kamsing V. Lee, Gregory

Attorneys at Law Skokie Boulevard Suite 600 Northbrook, Illinois FAX:

Ethnic Studies Asst 54, ,315-3, ,229 6,229. Gen Honors/UC Asso 64, ,402-4, ,430 24,430

Ethnic Studies Asst 55, ,755-2, ,111 4,111

Case 1:18-cv Document 2-10 Filed 05/08/18 Page 1 of 49 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BRAND REPORT FOR THE 6 MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 2017

Case 1:16-cv Document 1-1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6. Exhibit 1

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

FLC Washington DC Office

13. APPENDIX B DATA ENTRY GUIDELINES

All-Time College Football. Attendance. All-Time NCAA Attendance. Annual Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) Attendance. Annual Total NCAA Attendance

The Best Places to Work

Statutory change to name availability standard. Jurisdiction. Date: April 8, [Statutory change to name availability standard] [April 8, 2015]

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

May 16, 2013 EX PARTE. Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554

NO DATE FOR ORAL ARGUMENT HAS YET BEEN SET. No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

February 13, 2018 VIA ONLINE PORTAL AND ELECTRONIC MAIL

I write to appeal the Department s erroneous denial of the above-referenced Freedom of Information Act request.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv RCL Document 27-1 Filed 10/18/17 Page 1 of 53 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

The Government. Focus. FEATURE COMMENT: Government s Defective Pricing Claim In The Great Engine War Flames Out At The Federal Circuit

High-Tech Nation: How Technological Innovation Shapes America s 435 Congressional Districts

Shifting Regulation for Mountaintop Mining Valley Fills and the Confusion it Creates: The Spruce No. 1 Mine Inception to Current Litigation

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO

Case 1:10-cv ESH -HHK Document 14 Filed 07/15/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:11-cv JDB Document 16-1 Filed 11/21/11 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 4, 2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

BLS Spotlight on Statistics: Media and Information

U.S. Patents Awarded in 2005 Top 20 Universities

Case 1:15-mc ESH Document 14 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No IN THE Supreme Court of the United States. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent.

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Case 1:17-cv APM Document 29 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

The Jerome N. Frank Legal Services Organization

In the Supreme Court of the United States

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0177. Vietnam and veterans welcome home and thank you day.

Environmental Law: What Is Major in Major Federal Action?, Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Butz, 498 F.2d 1314 (8th Cir.

42 USC 254e. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Transcription:

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES * CASES Page AT&T v. Iowa Utils. Bd., 525 U.S. 366 (1999)...31 AT&T v. FCC, 487 F.2d 865 (2d Cir. 1973)...31 *Accuracy in Media, Inc. v. FCC, 521 F.2d 288 (D.C. Cir. 1975)...24, 25, 42 Adams Fruit Co. v. Barrett, 494 U.S. 638 (1990)...2 Am. Bus Ass n v. Slater, 231 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2000)...32 Am. Petroleum Inst. v. EPA, 52 F.3d 1113 (D.C. Cir. 1995)...21, 32 Archenar Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 62 F.3d 1441 (D.C. Cir. 1995)...52 Ass n of Data Processing Service Orgs., Inc. v. Bd. of Governors of the Federal Reserve Sys., 745 F.2d 677 (D.C. Cir. 1984)...50 Atlantic City Elec. Co. v. FERC, 295 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2002)...21 Bechtel v. FCC, 10 F.3d 875 (D.C. Cir. 1993)...54 Bldg. Owners & Managers Ass n Int l v. FCC, 254 F.2d 89 (D.C. Cir. 2001)...22, 25 California Indep. Sys. Operator v. FERC, 372 F.3d 395 (D.C. Cir. 2004)...28 California v. FCC, 905 F.2d 1217 (9th Cir. 1990)...22 Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994)...45, 46 Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. Skylink Technologies, Inc., 381 F.3d 1178 (Fed. Cir. 2004)...46 * Authorities upon which we chiefly rely are marked with asterisks. iii

Chevron USA, Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984)...2 Christensen v. Harris County, 529 U.S. 576 (2000)...2 Connecticut Nat l Bank v. Germain, 503 U.S. 249 (1992)...23 Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197 (1938)...51 Consumer Electronics Ass n v. FCC, 347 F.3d 291 (D.C. Cir. 2003)...33, 34 Dole v. United Steelworkers of Am., 494 U.S. 26 (1990)...2 *Elec. Indus. Ass n Consumer Electronics Group v. FCC, 636 F.2d 689 (D.C. Cir. 1980)... 23, 33-35 Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 51 F.3d 1053 (D.C. Cir. 1995)...38 *FCC v. Midwest Video Corp., 440 U.S. 689 (1979)...31, 44 FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000)...36, 43 Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. v. FERC, 734 F.2d 1486 (D.C. Cir. 1984)...51, 56 Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists, 392 U.S. 390 (1968)...45 Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC, 280 F.3d 1027 (D.C. Cir. 2002)...54 Girouard v. United States, 328 U.S. 61 (1946)...21 Halverson v. Slater, 129 F.3d 180 (D.C. Cir. 1997)...41 *Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9 (D.C. Cir. 1977)...51, 54 INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421 (1987)...36 Illinois Bell Tel. Co. v. FCC, 883 F.2d 104 (D.C. Cir. 1989)...31 iv

*Illinois Citizens Committee for Broadcasting v. FCC, 467 F.2d 1397 (7th Cir. 1972)...25, 28, 29 *Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc. v. Hawke, 211 F.3d 638 (D.C. Cir. 2000)...39, 41 Int l Bhd. of Teamsters v. ICC, 801 F.2d 1423 (D.C. Cir. 1986)...40 Kilburn v. Socialist People s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 376 F.3d 1123 (D.C. Cir. 2004)...28 Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm n v. FCC, 476 U.S. 355 (1986)...22 Lyng v. Payne, 476 U.S. 926 (1986)...21 MCI Telecomm. Corp. v. AT&T, 512 U.S. 218 (1994)...43 Martello v. Superior Court, 261 P. 476 (Cal. 1927)...32 Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 380 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2004)...43 Michigan Citizens for an Indep. Press v. Thornburgh, 868 F.2d 1285 (D.C. Cir. 1992)...40 Michigan v. EPA, 268 F.3d 1075 (D.C. Cir. 2001)...2, 22 *Motion Picture Ass n of Am. v. FCC, 309 F.3d 796 (D.C. Cir. 2002)... passim NARUC v. FCC, 525 F.2d 630 (D.C. Cir. 1976)...31 NARUC v. FCC, 533 F.2d 601 (D.C. Cir. 1976)...44 Nat l Min. Ass n v. Dep t of the Interior, 105 F.3d 691 (D.C. Cir. 1997)...32 New York v. FCC, 267 F.3d 91 (2d Cir. 2001)...31 NextWave Personal Communications, Inc. v. FCC, 254 F.3d 130 (D.C. Cir. 2001)...40 v

North American Telecomm. Ass n v. FCC, 772 F.2d 1282 (7th Cir. 1985)...23 North Haven Bd. of Educ. v. Bell, 456 U.S. 512 (1982)...36 Pac. Legal Foundation v. Dep t of Transp., 593 F.2d 1338 (D.C. Cir. 1979)...50 In re Permanent Surface Mining Regulation Litig., 653 F.2d 514 (D.C. Cir. 1981)...40 Prometheus Radio Project v. FCC, 373 F.3d 372 (3d Cir. 2004)...54 Qi-Zhuo v. Meissner, 70 F.3d 136 (D.C. Cir. 1995)...41 Radio Station WOW, Inc. v. Johnson, 326 U.S. 120 (1945)...27 Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16 (1983)...36 Shook v. District of Columbia Finan. Responsibility & Mgmt. Assistance Auth., 132 F.3d 775 (D.C. Cir. 1998)...40 Sierra Club v. EPA, 311 F.3d 853 (7th Cir. 2002)...32 *Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984)...20, 43-44, 48-49 Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. FCC, 19 F.3d 1475 (D.C. Cir. 1994)...26, 27, 31, 42 Tennessee Valley Auth. v. Hill, 437 U.S. 153 (1978)...40 United States v. Article of Drug Bacto-Unidisk, 394 U.S. 784 (1969)...31 United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218 (2001)...3 *United States v. Southwestern Cable Co., 392 U.S. 157 (1968)...25, 42 Whitman v. Am. Trucking Ass ns, 531 U.S. 457 (2001)...43 vi

FEDERAL STATUTES Administrative Procedure Act 5 U.S.C. 706(2)...50 Communications Act 47 U.S.C. 151...24, 29 *47 U.S.C. 152...16, 17, 23, 25 *47 U.S.C. 153... 23, 24, 26, 28-29 47 U.S.C. 154...23 47 U.S.C. 301...38 47 U.S.C. 302a...38 *47 U.S.C. 303... passim 47 U.S.C. 309(j)(14)...4 47 U.S.C. 330...40 *47 U.S.C. 336...13, 16, 41, 42 47 U.S.C. 396(k)...1 47 U.S.C. 403...1 47 U.S.C. 405...1 47 U.S.C. 521...1 47 U.S.C. 534(b)...1 47 U.S.C. 544A...38 vii

47 U.S.C. 549...38 Copyright Act 17 U.S.C. 106...45 17 U.S.C. 1002...45 17 U.S.C. 1201(a)...8, 9, 46 *17 U.S.C. 1201(c)(3)...44, 46 17 U.S.C. 1201(k)...9 Other Statutes 28 U.S.C. 2342...1 28 U.S.C. 2344...1 LEGISLATIVE MATERIALS *All-Channel Television Receivers: Hearings on S.2109 Before the Subcomm. on Communications of the Senate Comm. on Commerce, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 59 (1962)...35 Hearing before the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property, 108th Cong. Serial No. 5 (Mar. 6, 2003)...14 Hearings of Senate Interstate Commerce Committee, S. 2910, 73d Congress (1934)...30 144 Cong. Rec. H7100...44 144 Cong. Rec. S9936...44 *1962 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1873...33, 43 viii

H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 105-796 (1998)...9, 46 *H.R. Rep. No. 105-551 (1998)...44 *S. Rep. 1526, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 (1962)...33 S. Rep. No. 105-190, at 30-31 (1998)...44, 46 FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND NOTICES In re Digital Broadcast Content Protection, 18 F.C.C.R. 23,550, 68 Fed. Reg. 67,599 (2003)... passim In re Digital Broadcast Copy Protection, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 F.C.C.R. 16 (2003)...9, 27, 47 In re Digital Output Protection Technology & Recording Method Certification, FCC Order 04-193 (Aug. 12, 2004)... passim TREATISES AND ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY 2A Norman J. Singer, Statutes and Statutory Construction 47:24 (6th ed. 2000)...40 Pamela Samuelson, Intellectual Property and the Digital Economy: Why the Anti-Circumvention Regulations Need to be Revised, 14 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 519 (1999)...8 ix

2024 © careersdocbox.com Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Feedback