TITLE: Comparative Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Chronic Pain and Comorbid Conditions in Veterans

Similar documents
TITLE: Early ICU Standardized Rehabilitation Therapy for the Critically Injured Burn Patient

PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

TITLE: The impact of surgical timing in acute traumatic spinal cord injury

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Veterans Medical Research Foundation San Diego, CA 92161

TITLE: Vitamin D and Related Genes, Race and Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness

Addressing the Health Concerns of VA Women with Sexual Trauma. U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

Boston, MA PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

TITLE: Spouses/Family Members of Service Members at Risk for PTSD or Suicide. Fairfax, VA 22030

TITLE: Emergency Preservation and Resuscitation for Cardiac Arrest from Trauma (EPR-CAT)

PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

TITLE: Development and Validation of a Theory Based Screening Process for Suicide Risk

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

AWARD NUMBER: W81XWH TITLE: Care Planning for Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Dr.

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Walter Reed Army Medical Center Washington, DC

ý Award Number: MIPR 3GD3DT3083 Total Eye Examination Automated Module (TEAM) PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Colonel Francis L.

Bronx, NY PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, Massachusetts Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Wildland Fire Assistance

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

TITLE: Systematic Assessment of Caregiving Skill Performance by Individuals with Tetraplegia and Their Caregivers

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Implementation of Prolonged Exposure in the Army: Is Consultation Necessary for Effective Dissemination?

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

SIMULATOR SYSTEMS GROUP

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Information Technology

AFRL-VA-WP-TP

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Landstuhl Regional Medical Center Germany

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

at the Missile Defense Agency

Report No. DODIG Department of Defense AUGUST 26, 2013

Conservation Law Enforcement Program Standardization

Analysis of the Operational Effect of the Joint Chemical Agent Detector Using the Infantry Warrior Simulation (IWARS) MORS: June 2008

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

Preliminary Observations on DOD Estimates of Contract Termination Liability

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

711 HPW COUNTERPROLIFERATION BRANCH

Tim Haithcoat Deputy Director Center for Geospatial Intelligence Director Geographic Resources Center / MSDIS

SPECIAL REPORT Unsurfaced Road Maintenance Management. Robert A. Eaton and Ronald E. Beaucham December 1992

MK 83 WARHEAD EFFECTIVENESS TESTS

Military Health System Conference. Behavioral Health Clinical Quality in the MHS : Past Present and Future

Cold Environment Assessment Tool (CEAT) User s Guide

Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM

Water Usage at Forward Operating Bases

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

Report No. D-2011-RAM-004 November 29, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Projects--Georgia Army National Guard

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

Waco, TX PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

C-Band Working Group Update. Steve O'Neal AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 2/20/13

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

Potential Savings from Substituting Civilians for Military Personnel (Presentation)

Environmental Trends Course Cultural Resources

Award and Administration of Multiple Award Contracts for Services at U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity Need Improvement

Harnessing the Power of MHS Information Systems to Achieve Meaningful Use of Health Information

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

Military Health System Conference. Psychological Health Risk Adjusted Model for Staffing (PHRAMS)

Tannis Danley, Calibre Systems. 10 May Technology Transition Supporting DoD Readiness, Sustainability, and the Warfighter. DoD Executive Agent

The Army s Mission Command Battle Lab

Karen S. Guice, MD, MPP Executive Director Federal Recovery Coordination Program MHS, January 2011

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

Transcription:

AWARD NUMBER: W81XWH-15-1-0245 TITLE: Comparative Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Chronic Pain and Comorbid Conditions in Veterans PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Jun Mao CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research New York, NY 10065 REPORT DATE: October 2016 TYPE OF REPORT: Annual PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702-5012 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT: Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited The views, opinions and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy or decision unless so designated by other documentation.

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED October 2016 ANNUAL 30 Sep 2015-29 Sep 2016 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Comparative Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Chronic Pain and Co-morbid Conditions in Veterans 5b. GRANT NUMBER W81XWH-15-1-0245 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER JUN MAO 5e. TASK NUMBER E-Mail: maoj@mskcc.org 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT SLOAN KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH 1275 YORK AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10065-6007 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) ACRONYM(S) U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702-5012 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT Building on identified scientific gaps in the literature and our promising preliminary data, we will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Electro-acupuncture (EA) vs. Battle Field Acupuncture (BFA) vs. Waitlist Control usual care (WLC) on 360 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. We will also examine the effects of baseline outcome expectancy and genetic polymorphisms on pain reduction. The overarching goal of the Personalized Electro-acupuncture vs. Auricular-acupuncture Comparative Effectiveness (PEACE) trial is to investigate EA and BFA (a form of auricular acupuncture) to guide the personalized delivery of treatment to improve pain and co-morbid symptoms. To achieve the overarching goal, the specific aims are: Specific Aim 1: To compare the effects of Electro-acupuncture (EA) vs. Battle Field Acupuncture (BFA) vs. Waitlist Control usual care (WLC) on patient-reported pain (primary outcome), physical functions, and co-morbid symptoms [fatigue, sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)] among patients experiencing chronic musculoskeletal pain for three months or greater. Specific Aim 2: To determine the interaction between outcome expectancy and type of needling delivery (EA vs. BFA) on pain reduction. Specific Aim 3: To evaluate the association between specific genetic polymorphisms and patients responses to acupuncture. 15. SUBJECT TERMS Acupuncture; Electro-Acupuncture; Auricular-Acupuncture; Clinical Trial; Pain; Musculoskeletal Pain; Chronic Pain; Sleep Disturbance; Fatigue; Anxiety; Depression; Post-traumatic Stress Disorder; Physical Functioning; Genetics; Expectancy; Comparative Effectiveness 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT Unclassified b. ABSTRACT Unclassified c. THIS PAGE Unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES Unclassified 8 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON USAMRMC 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (include area code) Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18

Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction 4 2. Keywords. 4 3. Accomplishments..... 4 4. Impact... 7 5. Changes/Problems.... 7 6. Products.... 7 7. Participants & Other Collaborating Organizations. 8 8. Special Reporting Requirements 8 9. Appendices 8

1. INTRODUCTION: Building on identified scientific gaps in the literature and our promising preliminary data, we will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Electro-acupuncture (EA) vs. Battle Field Acupuncture (BFA) vs. Waitlist Control usual care (WLC) on 360 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. We will also examine the effects of baseline outcome expectancy and genetic polymorphisms on pain reduction. The overarching goal of the Personalized Electro-acupuncture vs. Auricular-acupuncture Comparative Effectiveness (PEACE) trial is to investigate EA and BFA (a form of auricular acupuncture) to guide the personalized delivery of treatment to improve pain and co-morbid symptoms. 2. KEYWORDS: Acupuncture Electro-Acupuncture Auricular-Acupuncture Clinical Trial Pain Musculoskeletal Pain Chronic Pain Sleep Disturbance Fatigue Anxiety Depression Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Physical Functioning Genetics Expectancy Comparative Effectiveness 3. ACCOMPLISHMENTS: What were the major goals of the project? To achieve the overarching goal described above, the specific aims are: Specific Aim 1: To compare the effects of Electro-acupuncture (EA) vs. Battle Field Acupuncture (BFA) vs. Waitlist Control usual care (WLC) on patient-reported pain (primary outcome), physical functions, and co-morbid symptoms [fatigue, sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)] among patients experiencing chronic musculoskeletal pain for three months or greater. Specific Aim 2: To determine the interaction between outcome expectancy and type of needling delivery (EA vs. BFA) on pain reduction. Specific Aim 3: To evaluate the association between specific genetic polymorphisms and patients responses to acupuncture. 4

Table I. Work Plan to Accomplish Specific Aims 1, 2, & 3: Timeline from Completion Award Date 9/15/2016 (Months) Progress as of 10/14/2016 Major Task 1: Plan & Prepare 1-6 In Progress Review and confirm protocol and procedure, incorporating Done 1 input from co-investigators Submit & obtain Approval from IRB at MSKCC 2-4 In Progress Submit & obtain Approval from HRPO 4-6 Submit amendments, adverse events and protocol deviations as As Needed needed Build procedure for annual IRB report (continuing review) 2 In Progress Hire Staff as needed 1-3 In Progress Train Staff as needed 2-4 In Progress Develop database 2-4 In Progress Pilot data collection with staff to ensure success 4-6 Pilot recruitment process with staff to ensure success 4-6 Major Task 2: Launch Study 7 Coordinate with facilities to kickoff recruitment 7 Major Task 3: Conduct Trial 7-54 Enroll subjects (40 patients) and randomly distribute patients between EA, BFA, & WLC perform designated treatment, collecting data as needed Enroll subjects (120 patients) and randomly distribute patients between EA, BFA, & WLC perform designated treatment, collecting data as needed Enroll subjects (140 patients) and randomly distribute patients between EA, BFA, & WLC perform designated treatment, collecting data as needed Enroll subjects (62 patients) and randomly distribute patients between EA, BFA, & WLC perform designated treatment, collecting data as needed Extract necessary data from bio-samples and catalogue in the database Perform ongoing data entry and data verification preemptively managing missing data Follow up with subjects at defined intervals to collect surveys and understand delayed effects of treatment Expand to recruitment regional network sites in New Jersey or New York affiliated with MSK if necessary to meet recruitment milestones 5 7-12 13-24 25-36 37-42 7-42 7-42 10-45 As Needed Major Task 4: Conduct Analysis 12-48 Genotype DNA extracted from patients to address Specific 36-48

Aim 3 Complete all analyses according to specifications, share output 36-48 and finding with all investigators Write manuscript based on findings, prepare for submission to 12-48 peer- reviewed clinical trial journal Major Task 5: Share Results 48+ Submit to peer-reviewed clinical trial journal Present Interim & final findings at DOD Conference What was accomplished under these goals? In December 2015, Dr. Jun J. Mao (PI) transitioned his faculty appointment from the University of Pennsylvania (U Penn) to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK). As a result, Dr. Mao has worked with DoD administrative officials to transfer the grant from U Penn to MSK during this past year. The updated project start date was moved from 9/30/2015 to 9/15/2016. During this past year, the project protocol has been updated to reflect the transfer of the grant project to MSK. After detailed conversations with DoD officials, it was approved to recruit patients from MSK. The updated project protocol is currently under review by the MSK IRB committees. We have interviewed and hired a post-doctoral researcher to work on the project. To date, we are on track with accomplishing our stated goals outlined in Table 1. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Sally A. D. Romero is our newly hired post-doctoral research; she has a PhD in Public Health with an emphasis in Health Behavior. She is currently taking a 6-week Genomics workshop hosted through Cornell University to gain a better understanding of contemporary genomics technologies and their applications in the biomedical field to apply to the project s Specific Aim 3. Throughout this next year, she plans to attend relevant seminars, workshops and conferences related to the goals of the project. How were the results disseminated to communities of interest? What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? During this next year, we will continue to accomplish the major tasks outlined in Table 1. We will plan and prepare the project (Major Task 1) including but not limited to the following tasks: o Receiving approval from MSK s IRB committees should be completed by November 2016. o Obtaining approval from HRPO will start as soon as we have received IRB approval from MSK (November 2016). o Hiring and training staff has started and will be completed by January 2017. o Piloting project procedures and recruitment with study staff will begin in January 2017. This will be done to ensure all data collection and recruitment procedures run smoothly prior to the official launch of the study. 6

Once the above planning/preparing tasks are completed, we will be ready to launch the study (Major Task 2) in early spring 2017. Next, we will start recruitment and conduct the trial (Major Task 3). We plan to have recruited and randomized a minimum of 40 MSK patients to the RCT by September 2017. 4. IMPACT: What was the impact on the development of the principal discipline(s) of the project? What was the impact on other disciplines? What was the impact on technology transfer? What was the impact on society beyond science and technology? 5. CHANGES/PROBLEMS: Changes in approach and reasons for change As stated above, Dr. Mao (PI) has transitioned from U Penn to MSK and has successfully transferred the grant to MSK. The updated project start date was moved from 9/30/2015 to 9/15/2016. Actual or anticipated problems or delays and actions or plans to resolve them Changes that had a significant impact on expenditures Significant changes in use or care of human subjects, vertebrate animals, biohazards, and/or select agents Significant changes in use or care of human subjects: Nothing to report. Significant changes in use or care of vertebrate animals: Not applicable. Significant changes in use of biohazards and/or select agents: Not applicable. 6. PRODUCTS: Publications, conference papers, and presentations: Nothing to report. Journal publications: Nothing to report. Books or other non-periodical, one-time publications: Nothing to report. Other publications, conference papers, and presentations: Nothing to report. Website(s) or other Internet site(s): Nothing to report. 7

Technologies or techniques: Nothing to report. Inventions, patent applications, and/or licenses: Nothing to report. Other Products: Nothing to report. 7. PARTICIPANTS & OTHER COLLABORATING ORGANIZATIONS What individuals have worked on the project? Name: Project Role: Researcher Identifier (e.g. ORCID ID): Nearest person month worked: Contribution to Project: Funding Support: Jun J. Mao PI ORCID ID: 0000-0001-9229-0380 1 Dr. Mao has worked with DoD administrative officials to have the grant transferred from the University of Pennsylvania to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Dr. Mao has written and developed the protocol submitted to the MSK IRB committees. Additionally, he has responded to clarification questions posed by the MSK IRB committees as it moves through the approval process. DoD Has there been a change in the active other support of the PD/PI(s) or senior/key personnel since the last reporting period? What other organizations were involved as partners? 8. SPECIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS COLLABORATIVE AWARDS: Not applicable. QUAD CHARTS: Not applicable. 9. APPENDICES: None. 8