Harnessing the Power of MHS Information Systems to Achieve Meaningful Use of Health Information

Similar documents
Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals

APPENDIX 2 NCQA PCMH 2011 AND CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS

during the EHR reporting period.

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

ARRA New Opportunities for Community Mental Health

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

ecw and NextGen MEETING MU REQUIREMENTS

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

EHR Meaningful Use Guide

Iatric Systems Supports the Achievement of Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use Stage 2

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

Roll Out of the HIT Meaningful Use Standards and Certification Criteria

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

in partnership with EHR Meaningful Use Guide for HITECH Attestation

Community Health Centers. May 6, 2010

Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible and Critical Access Hospitals

9/28/2011. Learning Agenda. Meaningful Use and why it s here. Meaningful Use Rules of Participation. Categories, Objectives and Thresholds

The HITECH EHR "Meaningful Use" Requirements for Hospitals and Eligible Professionals

Meaningful Use Roadmap

HITECH Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Stimulus Package. HITECH Act Meaningful Use (MU)

REQUIREMENTS GUIDE: How to Qualify for EHR Stimulus Funds under ARRA

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

INTERGY MEANINGFUL USE 2014 STAGE 1 USER GUIDE Spring 2014

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version 1.0

Practice Transformation: Patient Centered Medical Home Overview

Meaningful Use Final Rule:

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

MEANINGFUL USE BASICS

Meaningful Use May, 2012

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

EHR/Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core and Menu Measures. User Manual/Guide for Attestation using encompass 3.0

Core Measure Set. Status. MU1 Increase from 30% New. Computerized Physician Order Entry Use computerized provider order. NextGen EHR Medication Module

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule CPeH Advocacy Opportunities

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

GE Healthcare. Meaningful Use 2014 Prep: Core Part 1. Ramsey Antoun, Training Operations Coordinator December 12, 2013

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Overview

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

RE: Request for Comments Regarding Meaningful Use Stage 2

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

Medicaid Provider Incentive Program

Agenda 2. EHR Incentive Programs 3/5/2015. Overview EHR incentive programs Meaningful Use Differences between Stage 1 and Stage 2

INTERGY MEANINGFUL USE 2014 STAGE 2 USER GUIDE Spring 2014

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

ASCs and Meaningful Use. Patrick Doyle, Vice President Sales Jessica McBrayer, RN, Business Analyst Ron Pelletier, Vice President Market Strategy

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Meaningful Use and the Impact on Netsmart s Behavioral Health Clients

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

The History of Meaningful Use

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

CMS Modifications to Meaningful Use in Final Rule. Slide materials and recording will be available after the webinar

Meaningful Use Stage 2

April 10 th :00pm 1:00 pm

Abstract. Are eligible providers participating? AdvancedMD EHR features streamline meaningful use processes: Complete & accurate information

Proposed Meaningful Use Content and Comment Period. What the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Means to Medical Practices

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

PCMH 2014 Recognition Checklist

2014 PCMH Standards: How CPCI Can Help with Transformation. CHCANYS Quality Improvement Program November 20, 2014

Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. Shay Surowiak, RN, BSN, CHTS-CP HIT Practice Advisor

Updates to the EHR Incentive Programs Jason Felts, MS, CSCS HIT Practice Advisor

Military Health System Conference. Psychological Health Risk Adjusted Model for Staffing (PHRAMS)

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee May 6, 2014

Exchange 9/30/2010. Hawai i Health Information

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Specifics of the Program for Hospitals. August 11, 2010

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and Beyond

Eligible Professional Core Measure Frequently Asked Questions

Meaningful Use: Introduction to Meaningful Use Eligible Providers

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals

Part 3: NCQA PCMH 2014 Standards

Transcription:

2011 Military Health System Conference Harnessing the Power of MHS Information Systems to Achieve Meaningful Use of Health Information The Quadruple Aim: Working Together, Achieving Success Forum Moderator: COL Ron Moody January 24, 2011 TMA and Services

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 24 JAN 2011 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2011 to 00-00-2011 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Harnessing the Power of MHS Information Systems to Achieve Meaningful Use of Health Information 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Military Health System,TRICARE Management Activity,5111 Leesburg Pike, Skyline 5,Falls Church,VA,22041 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES presented at the 2011 Military Health System Conference, January 24-27, National Harbor, Maryland 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 33 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Learning Objectives Explain current Meaningful Use regulations Explain how MHS plans to meet the 2011 Meaningful Use requirements, Highlight other coordinated Service and MHS initiatives that go beyond MU, and Discuss integrating business intelligence to achieve Meaningful Use/meaningful use going forward 2

Background On July 13, 2010, CMS issued final rule on EHR Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Payment Program regarding implementation of Meaningful Use (MU) in 2011 Final rule established a total of 28 MU core and menu objectives; 5 menu objectives may be deferred MHS Goal is measured compliance with all objectives by Sep 2011 3

Key Points MHS well positioned to achieve full compliance based upon historic EHR investments included CPOE and structured documentation in AHLTA Meeting the MHS Goal will require Business process changes Technology Changes Analytics work for reporting Initial MU measure reports targeted for March 2011 4

2011 Objectives and Measures for MU Final Rule: Core Objectives Improve Quality, Safety, and Efficiency Objectives Use CPOE for medication orders directly entered by any licensed health care provider per state, local and professional guidelines (e.g. MD, DO, RN, PA, NP) for more than 30% of unique patients with at least one medication in their medication list Implement one clinical decision support rule and the ability to track compliance with the rule Stage 1 Measure More than 30% of unique patients with at least one medication in their medication list seen by the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital have at least one medication entered using CPOE Implement one clinical decision support rule (Attestation) 5

2011 Objectives and Measures for MU Final Rule: Core Objectives Improve Quality, Safety, and Efficiency Objectives Record and chart vital signs: height, weight, blood pressure, calculate and display BMI, plot and display growth charts for children 2 20 years, including BMI Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (erx) Maintain up to date problem list of current and active diagnoses Stage 1 Measure For more than 50% of all unique patients age 2 and over seen or admitted, height, weight, and blood pressure are recorded as structured data More than 40% of all permissible prescriptions written are transmitted electronically using certified EHR technology More than 80% of all unique patients seen or admitted have at least one entry or an indication that no problems are known for the patient recorded as structured data 6

2011 Objectives and Measures for MU Final Rule: Core Objectives Improve Quality, Safety, and Efficiency Objectives Implement drug drug, drugallergy interactions Record demographics: preferred language; gender; race; ethnicity, date of birth, and date and preliminary cause of death for a hospital mortality Maintain active medication list Stage 1 Measure Enabled this functionality for the entire EHR More than 50% of all unique patients seen by the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital have demographics as recorded structured data More than 80% of all unique patents seen or admitted have at least one entry (or an indication that the patient is not currently prescribed any medication) recorded as structured data 7

2011 Objectives and Measures for MU Final Rule: Core Objectives Improve Quality, Safety, and Efficiency Objectives Maintain active medication allergy list Record smoking status for patients 13 years or older Report ambulatory or hospital clinical quality measures to CMS or States Stage 1 Measure More than 80% of all unique patents seen or admitted have at least one entry (or an indication that the patient is not currently prescribed any medication) recorded as structured data More than 50% of all unique patients 13 years or older seen or admitted have smoking status recorded as structured data For 2011, provide data by attestation; For 2012, electronically submission required 8

2011 Objectives and Measures for MU Final Rule: Core Objectives Engage Patients and Families Objectives Provide patients with an electronic copy of their health information (including diagnostic test results, problem list, medication lists, medication allergies, discharge summary, procedures), upon request Outpatient: Provide clinical summaries for each office visit Hospitals Only: Provide patients with an electronic copy of their discharge instructions at time of discharge, upon request Stage 1 Measure More than 50% of all unique patients of the EP, eligible hospital who request an electronic copy of their health information are provided it within 3 business days Clinical summaries provided to patients for more than 50% of all office visits within 3 business days More than 50% of all patients who are discharged from an eligible hospital who request an electronic copy of their discharge instructions are provided it 9

2011 Objectives and Measures for MU Final Rule: Core Objectives Improve Coordination of Care Objectives Capability to exchange key clinical information (ex: problem list, medication list, medication allergies, diagnostic test results), among providers of care and patient authorized entities electronically Privacy and Security Objective Protect electronic health information created or maintained by certified EHR technology through the implementation of appropriate technical capabilities Stage 1 Measure Performed at least one test of the certified EHR technology s capacity to electronically exchange key clinical information Stage 1 Measure Conduct or review a security risk analysis and implement updates as necessary and correct identified security deficiencies as part risk management process 10

2011 Objectives and Measures for MU Final Rule: Menu Objectives (non core) Improve Quality, Safety, and Efficiency Objectives Incorporate clinical lab test results into EHR as structure data Generate lists of patients by specific conditions to use for quality improvement, reduction of disparities, research or outreach Implement drug formulary checks from at least one internal or external drug formulary Stage 1 Measure More than 40% of all clinical lab test results ordered whose results are either in a positive/negative or numerical format are incorporated in EHR as structured data Generate at least one report listing patients with a specific condition Attestation Yes or No 11

2011 Objectives and Measures for MU Final Rule: Menu Objectives (non core) Improve Quality, Safety, and Efficiency Objectives Hospitals Only: Record advance directives for patients 65 years old or older Outpatient Only: Send reminders to patients per patient preference for preventive/follow up care Stage 1 Measure More than 50% of all unique patients 65 years old or older admitted to a hospital have an indication of an advance directive status recorded More than 20% of all unique patients 65 years or older or 5 years old or younger were sent an appropriate reminder during the EHR reporting period 12

2011 Objectives and Measures for MU Final Rule: Menu Objectives (non core) Engage Patients and Families Objectives Outpatient Only: Provide patients with timely electronic access to their health information (including lab results, problem list, medication lists, medication allergies) within 4 business days of the information being available to the provider Stage 1 Measure More than 10% of all unique patients seen are provided timely (available to the patient within 4 business days of being updated in the certified EHR technology) electronic access to their health information Use certified EHR technology to identify patient specific education resources and provide those resources to the patient, if appropriate More than 10% of all unique patients seen or admitted to the eligible hospital are provided patient specific education resources 13

2011 Objectives and Measures for MU Final Rule: Menu Objectives (non core) Improve Coordination of Care Objectives The provider or eligible hospital who receives a patient from another setting of care or provider of care or refers their patient to another provider of care should provide a summary of care record for each transition of care or referral The provider or eligible hospital who receives a patient from another setting of care or provider of care or believes an encounter is relevant should perform medication reconciliation Stage 1 Measure Provide a summary of care record for more than 50% of transitions of care and referrals Perform medication reconciliation for more than 50% of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the provider or admitted 14

2011 Objectives and Measures for MU Final Rule: Menu Objectives (non core) Improve Population and Public Health Objectives Capability to submit electronic syndromic surveillance data to public health agencies and actual submission in accordance with applicable law and practice Capability to submit electronic data to immunization registries or Immunization Information Systems and actual submission in accordance with applicable law and practice Stage 1 Measure Performed at least one test of EHR technology s capacity to provide electronic syndromic surveillance data to public health agencies Performed at least one test of the EHR technology s capacity to submit electronic data to immunization registries 15

2011 Objectives and Measures for MU Final Rule: Menu Objectives (non core) Improve Population and Public Health Objectives Hospitals Only: Capability to submit electronic data on reportable (as required by state or local law) lab results to public health agencies and actual submission in accordance with applicable law and practice Stage 1 Measure Performed at least one test of EHR technology s capacity to provide submission of reportable lab results to public health agencies 16

Technical Changes Supporting Meaningful Use and Patient Centered Medical Home Changes to the MHS Patient Portal which is TricareOnLine (TOL) Look and Feel improvements Developed/implemented TOL Family Log-on Federate TOL with ebenefits and DFAS Portals TRICARE Online Blue Button Allows users to save their personal health data on their computer Implemented June 9, 2010 at TRICARE Online Technical changes which support MU, PCMH, and Patient Portal Initiative Meaningful Use Portlets (Patient Health Data) Secure Messaging Single Sign On 17

Panel Discussion -.-- I MHS Quadruple Aim 18

Summary Both functional and technical work is ongoing to ensure MHS meets 2011 MU Objectives The activities underway for MU, Patient Portal Initiative, Secure Messaging, Patient Center Medical Home, and the Personal Health Agenda Action Plan are mutually supportive. 19

Back-up - 20

Possible Future Changes to MU Policy (Source: CMS Brief) Intend to propose 2 additional Stages through future rulemaking. Future Stages will expand upon Stage 1 criteria. Stage 1 menu set will be transitioned into core set for Stage 2 CPOE measurement will go to 60% (MHS currently compliant) Administrative transactions will be added Will reevaluate other measures possibly higher thresholds Stage 3 will be further defined in next rulemaking 21

Stage 1 Final with Stage 2 and 3 Proposed Objectives from the Request for Comments from HHS Improve Quality, Safety, and Efficiency Objectives Stage 1 Final Stage 2 Prop Stage 3 Prop Use CPOE for medication orders (30%) Drug-drug/drug-allergy interaction checks CPOE for at least 1 med, and 1 lab or rad order 60% Employ on appropriate evidence-based interactions E-Prescribing (40%) 50% 80% Record demographics (50%) 80% 90% Record vital signs (50%) 80% 80% Record smoking status (50%) 80% 90% CPOE for at least 1 med, and 1 lab or rad order 80% Add drug age, drug dose, drug lab, and drug condition checking 22

Stage 1 Final with Stage 2 and 3 Proposed Objectives Improve Quality, Safety, and Efficiency Objectives Stage 1 Final Stage 2 Prop Stage 3 Prop Implement 1 CDS rule Use CDS to improve performance on highpriority health conditions. Use CDS to improve performance on highpriority health conditions. Implement drug formulary checks Record existence of advance directives (EH) (50%) Move current measure to core Make core requirement. For EP and EH 50% of patients >=65 have recorded in EHR 80% of medication orders are checked against relevant formularies 90% 23

Stage 1 Final with Stage 2 and 3 Proposed Objectives Improve Quality, Safety, and Efficiency Objectives Stage 1 Final Stage 2 Prop Stage 3 Prop Lab results as structured data (40%) Generate patient lists for specific conditions Sent patient reminders (20%) Move current measure to core Make core. Generate lists for multiple patient-specific parameters Make core 90% of lab results electronically ordered by EHR are stored as structured and reconciled with orders Patient lists are used to manage patients for high-priority health conditions 20% of active patients who prefer to receive reminders electronically receive preventive or follow-up reminders 24

Stage 1 Final with Stage 2 and 3 Proposed Objectives Improve Quality, Safety, and Efficiency Objectives Stage 1 Final Stage 2 Prop Stage 3 Prop None None None 30% of visits have at least one electronic EP note 30% of EH patient days have at least one electronic note by a physician, NP, or PA 30% of EH medication orders automatically tracked via electronic medication administration recording 90% 80% 80% 25

Stage 1 Final with Stage 2 and 3 Proposed Objectives Engage Patients and Families in Their Care Objectives Stage 1 Final Stage 2 Prop Stage 3 Prop Provide electronic copy of health information upon request (50%) Provide electronic copy of discharge instructions (EH) at discharge (50%) EHR-enabled patient specific educational resources (10%) Continue Stage 1 80% 90% Continue Stage 1 20% 90% of patients have timely access to copy of health information from EHR upon request 26

Stage 1 Final with Stage 2 and 3 Proposed Objectives Engage Patients and Families in Their Care Objectives Stage 1 Final Stage 2 Prop Stage 3 Prop None Provide clinical summaries for each office visit (EP) (50%) Provide timely electronic access (EP) (10%) 80% of patients offered the ability to view and download via a web-based portal relevant information contained in record about EH inpatient encounters Patients have ability to view and download relevant information about a clinical encounter within 24 hours. Follow-up tests linked to orders and available in future summaries of the encounter. Patients have ability to view and download information in longitudinal record within 4 days of data being available and can filter and organize by date, etc. Same Same Same 27

Stage 1 Final with Stage 2 and 3 Proposed Objectives Engage Patients and Families in Their Care Objectives Stage 1 Final Stage 2 Prop Stage 3 Prop Provide timely electronic access (EP) and Provide clinical summaries for each office visit (EP) None None EPs: 20% of patients with web access use a web-based portal to access their information. EPs: online secure patient messaging is in use Patient preferences for communication medium recorded for 20% of patients 30% Same 80% 28

Stage 1 Final with Stage 2 and 3 Proposed Objectives Engage Patients and Families in Their Care Objectives Stage 1 Final Stage 2 Prop Stage 3 Prop None None Offer electronic self-management tools to patients with high priority health conditions None None EHRs have capability to exchange data with PHRs using standards-based health data exchange None None Patients offered capability to report experience of care measures online None None Offer capability to upload and incorporate patient-generated data into EHRs and clinician workflow 29

Stage 1 Final with Stage 2 and 3 Proposed Objectives Improve Care Coordination Objectives Stage 1 Final Stage 2 Prop Stage 3 Prop Perform test of HIE Perform medication reconciliation (50%) Provide summary of care record (50%) Connect to at least three external providers in primary referral network or establish ongoing bidirectional connection to one HIE 80% 90% Move to Core 80% Connect to at least 30% of external providers in primary referral network or establish ongoing bidirectional connection to one HIE 30

Stage 1 Final with Stage 2 and 3 Proposed Objectives Improve Care Coordination Objectives Stage 1 Final Stage 2 Prop Stage 3 Prop None List of care team members (including PCP) available for 10% of patients in EHR 50% None Record a longitudinal care plan for 20% of patients with high-priority health conditions 50% 31

Stage 1 Final with Stage 2 and 3 Proposed Objectives Improve Population and Public Health Objectives Stage 1 Final Stage 2 Prop Stage 3 Prop Submit immunization data Submit reportable lab data EH and EP: Mandatory test. Some immunizations are submitted on an ongoing basis to Immunization Information System (IIS) as required by law EH: move to core EP: Lab reporting menu ensure reportable lab results and conditions are submitted to public health agencies Same + during well child/adult visits provides review IIS records via their EHR Mandatory test. EH: submit reportable lab results and reportable conditions. Complete contact information on 30% of reports. 32

Stage 1 Final with Stage 2 and 3 Proposed Objectives Improve Population and Public Health Objectives Stage 1 Final Stage 2 Prop Stage 3 Prop Submit syndromic surveillance data Move to core Mandatory test; submit if accepted None None Public Health Button for Eh and EP: Mandatory test and submit if accepted. Submit notifiable conditions using reportable public-health submission button. None None Patient-generated data submitted to public health agencies 33