ITRO 101. December 2011

Similar documents
Historical Background

Inter-Service Training

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE NAVAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Participation in Armed Forces, National, and International Sports Activities

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY 7700 ARLINGTON BOULEVARD FALLS CHURCH VA 22042

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Single Agency Manager (SAM) for Pentagon Information Technology Services

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: DoD Public Affairs and Visual Information (PA&VI) Education and Training (E&T)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: National Committee for Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve (NCESGR)

Subj: NAVAL DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING AND RADIOTHERAPY BOARD

AR 351-9/OPNAVINST E/AFI (I)/MCO D Interservice Training

Subj: ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES RELATED TO MEDICAL DEPARTMENT SPECIALTY LEADERS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY 7700 ARLINGTON BOULEVARD FALLS CHURCH VA 22042

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

OPNAVINST H N12 3 Sep 2015

ROLE OF THE PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT SECTION CHIEF, CONSULTANT, AND ARMY MEDICAL SPECIALIST CORPS OFFICE

ANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES. Support for Military Families with Special Needs. Pursuant to

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

DoD DRAFT DIRECTIVE ON SPACE EXECUTIVE AGENT

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2)

OPNAVINST A N Jan 2015

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Management of Defense Foreign Language Training

SUBJECT: Army Directive (The Army Credentialing Assistance Program)

NMETC 10 year Strategic Plan

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Management of DoD Language and Regional Proficiency Capabilities

SECRETARY OF THE ARMY WASHINGTON

MCO D C Sep 2008

School of Health Sciences

UNITED STATES ARMY SOLDIER SUPPORT INSTITUTE ADJUTANT GENERAL SCHOOL

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Mission. History. Cleared for public release. SAF/PA Case Number

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Joint Field Operating Agencies of the Office of The Surgeon General of the Army

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

All MHSS committees and workgroups will be sponsored by a DASD or a Deputy Surgeon General.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COUNTERINTELLIGENCE

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

TRAINING PROGRAM OF INSTRUCTION (TPI) FOR DINFOS - VIM VISUAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT COURSE

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C (b) USD (P&R) memo of 16 Jul 2009, Payment of Professional Expenses for Military Members (NOTAL)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Single Manager Responsibility for Military Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology and Training (EODT&T)

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #19

Subj: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE TO THE COMMANDANT OF THE MARINE CORPS

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

New Student Orientation. School of Nursing and Health Sciences

Ref: (a) DoD Instruction of 22 November 2011 (b) NTTP 1-15M (c) OPNAVINST H (d) CNO memo 1000 Ser N1/ of 24 Feb 09

DECS Staff Biosketches

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

PUBLIC LAW OCT. 1, 1986

Subj: MORALE, WELFARE, AND RECREATION AND NAVY EXCHANGE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: DoD Management of Space Professional Development

Defense Health Agency PROCEDURAL INSTRUCTION

3/10/2016. Medical Laboratory Training Platform 59 TH TRG. Overview. Overall Process

THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON, D. C

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Relationship of the DOD Information Technology Standards Registry (DISR) with the Defense Standardization Program

MCO C059 APR Subj: MARINE CORPS MODELING & SIMULATION MANAGEMENT

This publication is available digitally on the AFDPO WWW site at:

Staffing and Implementing Department of Defense Directives and Related DOD Publications

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

PROCEDURES FOR NAVY PARTICIPATION IN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SPACE TEST PROGRAM

FY16 Senate Armed Services National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)

This publication is available digitally on the AFDPO WWW site at:

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Department of Defense Corrosion Policy and Oversight FY 2013 OCO

RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT

Headquarters, Department of the Army Distribution Restriction: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) APA-Accredited Ph.D. Program in CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY

Army Regulation Management. RAND Arroyo Center. Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 25 May 2012 UNCLASSIFIED

DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY 7700 ARLINGTON BOULEVARD, SUITE 5101 FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND

Ref: (a) MROC Decision Memorandum dtd 18 Apr 2013 (b) SECNAV M Encl: (1) Role of Performance Management and MCSHA in PPBE

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Department of the Army *TRADOC Regulation Headquarters, United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Monroe, VA

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. DoD Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Management

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: DoD Science and Engineering Apprenticeship Program for High School Students

Joint Base Planning Opportunities and Challenges. April 13, 2012

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF UNITED STATES FLEET FORCES COMMAND

Army. Environmental. Cleanup. Strategy

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Change 142 Manual of the Medical Department U.S. Navy NAVMED P Oct 2012

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

INFORMATION ABOUT THE POSITIONS OPEN FOR NOMINATION

2014 QAPI Plan for [Facility Name]

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, DC

Transcription:

ITRO 101 December 2011

Interservice Training Review Organization (ITRO) Health Care Interservice Training Office (HC-ITO) Services Medical Education and Training Campus (METC) Training Studies

Interservice Training Review Organization (ITRO) Health Care Interservice Training Office (HC-ITO) Services Medical Education and Training Campus (METC) ITRO Training Studies

Historical Background Voluntary organization established 1972, includes Coast Guard Authority: Interservice Training Regulation Army: AR 351-9 Navy: OPNAVINST 1500.27F Air Force: AFI 36-2230(I) Coast Guard: COMDTINSTR 1580.1 Comprehensive procedures manuals

Mission Vision Service professionals working together to ensure the United States military gets the best return on its individual training investment Mission Improve the effectiveness and efficiency of individual training, consistent with Service requirements, by standardizing instruction, eliminating duplication and reducing costs

Responsibilities Strategy/planning Providing policy and guidance for interservice training Implementation Reviewing training and related activities to increase effectiveness and efficiency Performing special studies as directed Serving as a POC and providing a forum for the free interchange of ideas, information and technology related to interservice training Meeting service requirements through proactive Lifecycle Management of ITRO courses

ITRO guided by structure of boards and committees Organization

Executive Board (EB): Last met in FY 2000 Consists of commander/ director from each of the Service training commands Delegated decisionmaking authority to the Deputy Executive Board (DEB) DEB: Meets semiannually Consists of principal deputy to EB member Exercises decisionmaking and policy implementation authority on behalf of EB Governing Boards

Meets quarterly Consists of Directors from each of the ITO offices Coordinates day-today ITRO activities Identifies requirements and formulates policy recommendations to DEB Provides oversight of ITRO committees Steering Committee (SC)

Six Interservice Training Offices Four Services Coast Guard Health Care, Navy is Executive Agent ITRO Secretariat Rotates annually among four Services Serves as central POC for ITRO matters Staffs ITRO actions and chairs ITRO committees Offices

Resource Committees Manpower Committee Facilities Committee Cost Analysis Committee Procedures and Directives Committee Other Committees Training Technology Committee Ad Hoc Committees Committees

Interservice Training Review Organization (ITRO) Health Care Interservice Training Office (HC-ITO) Services Medical Education and Training Campus (METC) HC-ITO Training Studies

Historical Background 1974 Medical/Dental Committee established with Navy flag as chair 1994 Health care office established 2005 HC-ITO moved from Bethesda to Ft Sam Houston to support BRAC & Transformation Initiatives 1975 1985 1995 2005 1998 Interservice Training Advisory Board (ITAB) set up as decisionmaking body

Responsibilities Strategy/planning Develop policies for health care interservice training Partner with METC to implement BRAC initiative Support DoD Training Transformation initiatives Implementation Facilitate health care training studies Provide a neutral forum for resolution of Service concerns/issues and training information exchange Meet changing Service requirements through proactive Life Cycle Management of ITRO courses Maintain a repository of study information

Organization Health Care guided by Interservice Training Advisory Board (ITAB) HC-ITO Serves as permanent Secretariat Staffs all health care actions

ITAB Decision-making body for health care Identifies and prioritizes areas with potential for consolidation/ collocation Coordinates and formulates Service positions

ITAB Membership ITRO Advisor for Health Care (Navy flag officer) ITAB Chair Dean, Academy of Health Sciences (AHS) Army Voting Member Director Academics & Governance, NAVMED MPT&E Navy Voting Member Deputy, Headquarters Air Education and Training Command (AETC)/A3I Air Force Voting Member Chief, Force Readiness Command Coast Guard (non-voting)

HC-ITO Staff Advisor for Health Care NMSC, Jacksonville Director Navy Liaison Air Force Liaison Army Liaison

Interservice Training Review Organization (ITRO) Health Care Interservice Training Office (HC-ITO) Services Medical Education and Training Campus (METC) HC-ITO and METC Training Studies

Strategy HC-ITO Move to Ft Sam Houston to support BRAC and Transformation initiatives Conduct consolidation studies METC Host for all enlisted medical training except aerospace medicine Largest military medical education & training institution Average daily student load (ADSL) of 8706 Estimated annual throughput 44K (enlisted and officer basic & specialty training and education)

HC-ITO Partnership with METC FOSC Guidance Utilize ITRO process Consolidate where feasible Develop a single capability set identified by a single title consistent with Service requirements Meet accreditation and certification standards Adopt best practices Maintain Title 10 authority

Consolidation Challenges Differences among Services Capability sets across the Services Training philosophies among the Services (Apprentice versus Journeyman) Entry level knowledge Not all programs meet accreditation/certification standards Resource constraints

HC-ITO Milestones Completed consolidation studies for all MOS/NEC/AFSC/SI non ITRO programs Identified 14 new consolidations Identified manpower, facility, & equipment requirements Most programs have consolidated and servicespecific portions Percentage of curriculum consolidated varies Iterative process in response to changes

Post-BRAC Consolidations Existing consolidated programs New consolidated programs Allergy/Immunization Neurology/END Cardiovascular Technology BMET Nuclear Medicine Otolaryngology Technologist Cytotechnology Occupational Therapy Medical Laboratory Technician Ophthalmic Technician Patient Administration Pharmacy Technician Dental Laboratory Optician Medical Logistics Physical Therapy Assistant Flight Medic Orthopedic Armed Forces Basic Medical Technician Histopathology Physical Therapy Behavioral Health Technician IPAP Respiratory Therapy Nutrition and Diet Therapy Preventive Medicine Radiography Surgical Technologist

Interservice Training Review Organization (ITRO) Health Care Interservice Training Office (HC-ITO) Services Medical Education and Training Campus (METC) Training Studies Training Studies

Types of Interservice Training DoD Executive Agent (EA) Joint Quota Distinctive characteristic As directed by Office of Secretary of Defense Involves joint forces/ staffs Owning Service controls content Service participation Mandatory As required Space-available basis ITRO role Assist as requested Assist as requested Assist as requested ITRO Resourced per ITRO rules Voluntary Primary oversight

Types of ITRO Training Curriculum Decisions Faculty Equipment & Facilities Consolidated Mutual agreement Fair-shared Fair-shared Collocated* Owning Service Owning Service May be shared *Under METC, collocated is not considered ITRO but may use ITRO processes when requested

ITRO Process Determine consolidation feasibility Quick Look Group (QLG) Detailed Analysis Group (DAG) Complete curriculum analysis Identify consolidation options Determine manpower, facilities, cost Identify fair share Resource Requirements Analysis (RRA) Implementation Conduct curriculum reviews for lifecycle management

Quick Look Group (QLG) Purpose Conduct high level (MACRO) analysis to determine feasibility of consolidation/collocation Outcomes Identify the level of commonality of training requirements Determine if enough commonality to recommend continuing to DAG

Detailed Analysis Group (DAG) Purpose Conduct in-depth (MICRO) curriculum analysis Determine consolidation/collocation options Outcomes Develop a proposed curriculum structure Identify areas impacting option recommendations Identify unique resource issues

Resource Requirements Analysis (RRA) Purpose Analyze options from DAG Outcomes Manpower, facilities, and cost analysis for each option

Curriculum Review (CR) Purpose Analyze proposed curriculum changes for resource impact Outcomes Document proposed program structure changes Notional POI/curriculum plan Program model (diagram) Identify unique resource issues

HC-ITO Partnership with METC