lobal armonised ubmission ransport tandard (GHSTS) OECD Project on Harmonisation of Electronic Submissions of Pesticide Dossiers

Similar documents
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL ENVIRONMENT Directorate A Green Economy ENV.A.3 - Chemicals

IMDRF FINAL DOCUMENT. Title: Strategic Assessment of Electronic Submission Messaging Formats

Agenda. Workflows and Software Tools for the Process of Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of European Chemicals

The implementation of the Clinical Trial Regulation (CTR, n 536/2014) in Belgium. and impact on the ethical review process

ACO Practice Transformation Program

Certification Scheme for a Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product (CPP) IFPMA CPP Network Training Toolkit

Factors and policies affecting services innovation: some findings from OECD work

esubmission roadmap v2.0: Industry viewpoint

Current and future standardization issues in the e Health domain: Achieving interoperability. Executive Summary

Overview of ICH. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use.

ECHA and the implementation of REACH,CLP and other tasks

A Career in Big Pharma. Beatrice Tilt, GSK

Why aren t we all using Real-World Evidence if it is so insightful and powerful? Because it is difficult to generate. Introducing E360 by IMS Health

Update of the Work plan on international activities 2012

Russ Kuhn Scott Moore Esri

Maryland Central Business Licensing & Registration Portal. IACA Jurisdiction Presentation May 20, 2015

Regulatory Affairs Outsourcing

H2020 Programme. Guidelines on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Research Data in Horizon 2020

Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey November 4 5, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

ACCESS LARC INCREASING ACCESS TO IMMEDIATE POSTPARTUM LONG-ACTING REVERSIBLE CONTRACEPTION

CLP the implementation of GHS in the EU Facts and practical advice

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

LISAM SYSTEMS REACH Compliant SDSs: What s Changed and What s Coming

Title: Climate-HIV Case Study. Author: Keith Roberts

Contents Aims and scope... 4

CLP Regulation Recent implementation and issues. Workshop "Product Stewardship and PROCESS SAFETY 30/11/2017 Dr. Blanca Serrano

EDQM roadmap for electronic submissions

9/10/2013. Contributions of ECHA to the achievement of the REACH goals. Content of Discussion

1 The EU Harmonised technical ectd guidance version 4.0

Patients registered at a GP Practice

Leverage Information and Technology, Now and in the Future

europeana business plan 2012

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB DATA SHARING INDEPENDENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (IRC) CHARTER

September 16 th, Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm Rockville, MD 20852

Virginia Growth and Opportunity Fund (GO Fund) Grant Scoring Guidelines

7WAYS GRANTS MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE ELEVATES GRANTMAKING FOR SMALL FOUNDATIONS

Arizona Hospital Discharge Data Submission to CDC NEPHT Network Fellowship

Annex 2 to the HMA esubmission Roadmap: Implementation of mandatory use of ectd format for regulatory submissions

Using Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes (epro) in Clinical Trials: Lessons Learnt

1 Title Improving Wellness and Care Management with an Electronic Health Record System

Study definition of CPD

ectd IV: It s Almost As Fun As Super Bowl XLIX DIA eregulatory and Intelligence Annual Conference Disclaimer

Guidelines for new FOCAL POINTS

CWE TM COMPATIBILITY ENFORCEMENT

Building blocks of health information: Classifications, terminologies, standards

The place of the Certification procedure in 2017 in the EU regulatory framework and beyond. Prague, 19 September 2017

Toolbox for the collection and use of OSH data

Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding

Guidelines on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Research Data in Horizon 2020

2010 Operational Plan - Project Description. 1

Patient Registry Initiative- Strategy and Mandate of the Cross-Committee Task Force

Update on FDA-EMA QbD Pilot

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND TRAINING (ART) GRANTS PROGRAM Proposal Response Guidance

March 20, 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES

2017 Innovation Fund. Guidelines for completing a notice of intent and a proposal

D6.3 Communication management routines and infrastructure implemented

Open Terminology Portal (TOP)

DONOR RETENTION TOOLKIT

Lessons in Innovation: The SSBN Tactical Control System Upgrade

Implementation of REACH & CLP: common challenges of national authorities and ECHA

5 Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T)

DRAFT OPINION. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/0018(COD) of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy

HORIZON 2020: INTERIM EVALUATION UUKi S SUBMISSION JANUARY 2017

3. Does the institution have a dedicated hospital-wide committee geared towards the improvement of laboratory test stewardship? a. Yes b.

UNIversal solutions in TELemedicine Deployment for European HEALTH care

The European Medicines Agency s review process of medicines labelling and packaging to prevent risks of medication errors

Use of disease registries for benefitrisk evaluation of medicines: A regulatory perspective. DIA Europe April Basel, Switzerland

JOINT CODE OF PRACTICE FOR RESEARCH

Potential of the use of electronic patient information for clinical research in the pharmaceutical industry

Improving the Safety of International Non-proprietary Names of Medicines (INNs) Position Statement 2011

THE GLOBAL FUND to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria

Workplace Safety & Health Innovation Awards 2016 Guidelines and Application Form

A look into the PCN format, UFI generator and EU PCS

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. Safety of the food chain Chemicals, contaminants, pesticides

Call for proposals. Nordic Centres of Excellence within escience in Climate and Environmental research

Harmonisation of Information for Poison Centres

RESEARCH POLICY MANUAL

A Dedicated Post Authorisation Measure Submission Form

Trends in the development of regulatory systems by the example of ICH countries

Funding Opportunities with the Standards and Trade Development Facility (STDF) Guidance Note for Applicants

Quality Risk Management ICH Q9

REACH-IT Industry User Manual

ELITE Connecting companies with capital

The hallmarks of the Global Community Engagement and Resilience Fund (GCERF) Core Funding Mechanism (CFM) are:

Digital Health & Clinical Decision Support System. Sanjeev Singh Sr Medical Superintendent Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India

case study Europass XML

Brussels, 19 December 2016 COST 133/14 REV

ENTREPRENEURSHIP. Training Course on Entrepreneurship Statistics September 2017 TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE ASTANA, KAZAKHSTAN

bd.com Pyxis Enterprise Server

Pilot Program Framework Proposal

Annual Complaints Report 2014/15

The future of patient care. 6 ways workflow automation will transform the healthcare experience

Medical devices briefing for patients: Patient safety in the new Regulation

Enlighten Your EaP

Policies Targeting Payer Harmonization: The Provider Perspective

Update from ECHA. REACH Implementation Workshop X. 13 December Laurence Hoffstadt ECHA Substance Identification & Data Sharing

Request for Proposals

The Classification and Labelling Inventory. Cefic s viewpoint

Item 4. Report from the last UN Statistical Commission

The New EU PV Legislation: View from the European Commission

Transcription:

G lobal H ST armonised ubmission S ransport tandard (GHSTS) OECD Project on Harmonisation of Electronic Submissions of Pesticide Dossiers

Benefits of the Global Harmonised Submission Transport Standard (GHSTS) The OECD Harmonisation Project The Global Harmonised Submission Transport Standard (GHSTS) is a standardised set of technical specifications for assembling electronic files prepared by pesticide companies for submission to governments for regulatory approval of pesticide products. The GHSTS has been published by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and is available at www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/submission-transport-standard/ goal The overall goal of the GHSTS is to promote harmonisation and increase the efficiency of regulatory processes. The development of this standard allows for easier submission and exchange of electronic data packages between industry and regulatory authorities as well as across all participating regulatory authorities. BENEFITS z Promotes harmonisation through the establishment of a single worldwide technical standard for all types of pesticide submissions. z Supports the submission of a single dossier to multiple recipients, even if they have different business requirements. z Increases efficiency for preparing and processing Multi-National Reviews currently multinational submissions are both resource intensive for industry to assemble and awkward for regulatory authorities to review. The GHSTS improves communication and simplifies work sharing between Regulatory Authorities by providing the information on a standard platform. z Increases efficiency of regulatory processes and approvals better quality electronic submissions can potentially lead to shorter and less variable regulatory timelines, since applicants have better tools and guidance on preparing complete dossiers. z Version management for submissions and documents in a regulatory action, it reduces the need to send duplicate documents across multiple submissions, since they are contained within a single revisable dossier. z Delivers structured data about the submission in XML format. Multiple document types can be submitted including the structured OECD Harmonised Templates. Harmonised content allows the data to be more structured and readable for man and machine. z The GHSTS includes elements that are common among existing electronic standards for pesticide submission. The OECD focused on the metadata used in each of the electronic standards already in place to submit information to regulatory authorities and developed a single set of metadata that could be used by all authorities. For example, there are plans to incorporate GHSTS requirements into future IUCLID releases, an electronic submission system for registering chemicals in Europe, which is increasingly used by other countries. z Provides some information management capabilities for smaller companies, since the GHSTS tracks the lifecycle of a dossier. z Due to the generalised nature of the components, fields, and lifecycles of the GHSTS, it can be adapted for use in other business lines, and is not only limited to pesticides. z Promotes identification and tracking of entities using a unique coding system for companies, regulatory authorities, substances, documents, and other entities. This unique coding system helps companies and regulatory authorities work together in identifying and managing such information. 2

Current submission process: Highlights GHSTS develops one new standard acceptable for all based on and replacing the existing standards. 3

ECOSYSTEM Composition: In order to help both industry and regulatory authorities implement this standard, a GHSTS ecosystem has been developed. The GHSTS ecosystem is comprised of elements that define the Standard maintained at the OECD, and tools developed by governments and private industry and made freely available that support the use of the Standard. Standard Details: z Specification Document Guidance document for developers and business analysts. z XSD (XML Technical Information) - Code that defines the GHSTS, and includes the OECD Table of Contents. z Pick Lists allows for a standard terminology to be used within the submission package and across packages. New items can be added to the pick list by the user. z Validation Rules Set of rules that can be integrated into a separate validator tool or an internal document management system. Used to validate the quality and completeness of the submission package. Tools: z Builder used to create a GHSTS submission package based on information entered directly into the tool. Outputs are in structured XML format, along with associated submission documents. z Viewer - software that allows for user-friendly viewing of a submission package, the XML structured data and associated submission documents. Facing the challenge Bringing new standards and technology into an organisation has the potential to increase productivity, and help make better, faster decisions. However, getting buy-in from users is often a challenge when that technology is perceived as disruptive. From organisations that have no systems in place, to ones that already have well established systems, we all have unique challenges in adopting new standards and technologies. To overcome this challenge, the OECD offers free online resources to help promote adoption of the GHSTS. Documentation and training materials have been made available in the link below, and include an overview presentation along with a sample Dossier and a GHSTS desktop viewer: www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/ submission-transport-standard/documentation-training-materials.htm Organisations can use these resources to create a compelling vision of the GHSTS, and to demonstrate the many tangible benefits associated with using the new technology. 4

Individuals or/and organisations that are willing to share lessons learned and/or offer support for any new country seeking to implement the GHSTS are currently being identified, as well as additional training materials needed to facilitate the adoption of the GHSTS. Any questions regarding the GHSTS project may be addressed to ehs.cont@oecd.org. GHSTS BENEFITS : How can GHSTS benefits me? GHSTS offers advantages for Industry, Regulatory Authorities and the Public. How can GHSTS benefit smaller companies with limited technical ressources? GHSTS provides some information management solutions for smaller companies that may not already have a system in place. Metadata and lifecycle information associated with legal entities, substances, products, documents, dossiers and submissions can be managed within the GHSTS. Additionally, the builder and validation rules will help companies build better quality and complete submissions. By creating and storing submissions electronically, significant reduction on paper printing and document storage can be achieved. How can GHSTS benefit larger companies with establised electronic systems? The existence of multiple standards means that the applicant must duplicate their submission preparation effort which can be a time consuming and sometimes error-prone process. GHSTS will help reduce the administrative burden associated with preparing multiple submissions across individual regulatory authorities. Developing a GHSTS standard can benefit larger companies by improving communication and simplifying work sharing between Regulatory Authorities on a national and multi-national level. Increased collaboration between regulatory authorities on all levels may help promote work sharing and increase the number of countries in which a product can be approved. As well, simplified information sharing between regulatory authorities can help broaden the use pattern of the label. How can GHSTS benefit Regulatory Authorities without an electronic dossier system in place? By adopting the GHSTS, regulatory authorities receive electronic submissions that contain version management for submissions and documents, which will help reduce administrative burden associated with processing redundant documents across multiple submissions. Additionally, GHSTS provides regulatory authorities with the necessary tools to review electronic dossiers, such as the viewer, which will be available free of charge. 5

How can GHSTS benefit Regulatory Authorities with an electronic dossier system already in place? It is understood that many regulatory authorities may not be able to quickly and easily adopt new standards due to legislative, process and technology hurdles. However, it is suggested that the GHSTS be considered in any ongoing and future developments to your system. As a first step in the development of GHSTS, the OECD focused on the metadata (in XML format) used in various electronic standards already in place by regulatory authorities, and developed a single set of structured metadata that could be used by all authorities. This set of metadata includes elements common to many existing systems, along with additional elements required for specific systems. This will allow integration of GHSTS into already established systems with minimal disruption to business practices. Viewer software, which will allow for user-friendly viewing of a submission package in a web-browser, functions independently of in-house document management systems. This provides co-operating regulatory authorities the assurance of knowing that they are working from a common set of material throughout the review process, regardless of the systems in use by the various regulatory authorities. How can GHSTS benefit Regulatory Authorities developing an on-line submission portal? GHSTS can provide a useful standard to follow regarding meta-data and life cycle management concepts and facilitation of an exchange of information amongst regulatory authorities even if a regulatory authority plans to receive submissions via data entry in an on-line portal. How can the GHSTS benefit citizens? Multi-national reviews of pesticide submissions facilitate a more efficient and cost effective regulatory process. Duplication of evaluative work is avoided. In fact, the joint evaluation of dossiers brings together experts from several countries who provide peer review evaluations which allow the public to have greater confidence in the scientific conclusions used as the basis for the regulatory decisions. Further to this, GHSTS facilitates the exchange of information amongst regulatory authorities which could allow for approval of safer and more efficacious pesticides into the global market more rapidly than if each country were working completely independently. 6