Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

Similar documents
May Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

April Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT IDAHO FALLS TRAINING SITE BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT CENTENNIAL TRAINING SITE COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT AIRPORT TRAINING AREA BOISE, IDAHO

March Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

FINAL Operational Range Assessment Program Phase I Qualitative Assessment Report

July Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT HUNTER ARMY AIRFIELD SAVANNAH, GEORGIA

Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT WALLY EAGLE DROP ZONE LOVELAND, COLORADO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT SNAKE CREEK TRAINING SITE MIRAMAR, FLORIDA

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT VOLUNTEER TRAINING SITE - SMYRNA SMYRNA, TENNESSEE

UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BALTIMORE DISTRICT

Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT VAIL TREE FARM LOCAL TRAINING AREA CENTRALIA, WASHINGTON

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT RAMEY LOCAL TRAINING AREA AGUADILLA, PUERTO RICO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT SAN JUAN NATIONAL FOREST TRAINING AREA DOLORES, COLORADO

May Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT LIEUTENANT COLONEL HERNAN G

Managing Range Condition Assessments: The Army s Operational Range Qualitative Assessment Program

DESIGN AND THE ARTS SPECIAL COLLECTIONS TEMPE RIO SALADO PROJECT COLLECTION

FY2016 SIEVERS-SANDBERG USARC

Appendix D: Restoration Budget Overview

Range Environmental Vulnerability Assessment

±39 ACRES FOR SALE EXCLUSIVE LISTING PHOENIX, ARIZONA. Subject

Foreword. Mario P. Fiori Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment)

US Army Corps of Engineers. Section 408 Overview. Regulatory Workshop July 22, Kim Leonard/Kevin Lee BUILDING STRONG

EXPLOSIVES SAFETY SUBMISSION. No Further Action AIR FORCE MILITARY MUNITIONS RESPONSE PROGRAM MUNITIONS RESPONSE SITE CHARACTERIZATION

U.S. ARMY RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD. and TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION GUIDANCE

Solutions to Unique Challenges in Sustaining the Navy s Readiness at San Clemente Island Ranges

Society of American Military Engineers 2008 Missouri River/TEXOMA Regional Conference

FINAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION/COST ANALYSIS (EE/CA) LAND USE CONTROLS FORT BLISS, TX MILITARY MUNITIONS RESPONSE PROGRAM

Army. Environmental. Cleanup. Strategy

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Military Munitions Support Services (M2S2) Overview

Solutions to Unique Challenges in Sustaining the Navy s Readiness at San Clemente Island Ranges

SHPO%Guidance%for%Use%and%Submittal% of%the% Survey%Report%Summary%Form%% (SRSF)% % SHPO%Guidance%Point%No.%10% % %Revised% %January%2016%

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5H

ASTSWMO Annual Meeting October 25, 2006

FY2013 LTA - MARION ENGR DEPOT EAST

Army Environmental Cleanup Strategic Plan

COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN

U^J. INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN. Prepared by the U.S. Army Environmental Center March 1999

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

FINAL DECISION DOCUMENT

Federally Supported Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment Programs

CESAM-RD-M May 2, 2013 PUBLIC NOTICE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS MOBILE DISTRICT

CESAJ-PM (Cong) March 2015

Fiscal Year 2012 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

PUBLIC NOTICE.

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

FY2016 AFRC FORT WADSWORTH

City of Oakland Park

Environmental Baseline Survey for Naval Weapons Station Concord

WRP Natural Resources Committee s Southeastern Arizona/New Mexico (SoAZ/NM Project)

Defense Environmental Restoration Program Manual

MMRP Site Inspections at FUDS Challenges, Status, and Lessons Learned

Fiscal Year 2011 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

SITE SURVEY SUMMARY SHEET FOR DERP-FUDS SITE NO. J09CAO84400

NG-J32 CNGBI DISTRIBUTION: A 27 January 2014 NATIONAL GUARD COUNTERDRUG PROGRAM GENERAL OFFICER ADVISORY COUNCIL

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EC US Army Corps of Engineers CECW-ZB Washington, DC Circular No September 2018

The House and Senate overwhelmingly approved the legislation. The vote in the Senate was 91-7 and in the House of Representatives.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Item 3: The Index of Drawing on Sheet PM-1 in the Plans, Volume II has been revised to separate Sheets PM-29, 30 and 31 as Bid Alternate 1.

Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress for FY 2015

The attached is updated text for incorporation into the subject document. Replace current text pages with the change text pages as described below:

HOUSE RESEARCH Bill Summary

1 San Diego, CA One Corps Serving The Army and The Nation

WHO'S IN AND WHO'S OUT

Western Regional Partnership Overview

Public Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

The Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force

In-Step, In Line, On Time. Robert F. Tally Jr. FHWA Indiana Division Administrator Monday, November 16, 2009

Federal Facilities. Restoration and Reuse Office. NGA Working Group on the Cleanup of. 2 October 2008

RESTORE ACT Direct Component Multiyear Plan Matrix Department of the Treasury OMB Approval No Applicant Name:

Military Munitions Response Program Site Inspection Camp Bullis, Texas. Courtney M.S. Ingersoll

GOVERNANCE, STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT, COORDINATION

ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION DISTRICTS STRATEGIC PLAN P age 75 Years of Locally Led Conservation

New Draft Section 408 Policy Document EC

DoD and EPA Management Principles for Implementing Response Actions at Closed, Transferring, and Transferred (CTT) Ranges

Page 1 of NATIONWIDE PERMIT (NWP) PROGRAM - SUMMARY - ALABAMA CERTIFICATION & PRE-CONSTRUCTION INFOMATION

55644 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 213 / Friday, November 2, 2001 / Notices

Department of the Air Force


Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

PUBLIC NOTICE. Attn: Mr. Christopher Layton 1200 Duck Road Duck, North Carolina CB&I 4038 Masonboro Loop Road Wilmington, North Carolina 28409

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

MRP Execution. Navy & Marine Corps Cleanup Conference 2004 Richard Mach

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

The Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure. - An Overview - JSEM US Army Installation Geospatial. US Air Force GeoBase

jobs program earmark ban

NG-J1 CNGBI DISTRIBUTION: A 03 May 2013 NATIONAL GUARD JOINT DIVERSITY EXECUTIVE COUNCIL

Comprehensive Planning Grant. Comprehensive Plan Checklist

United States Army Corps of Engineers Pittsburgh District Regulatory Program. Westmoreland County 2014 Engineers Workshop. March 20 th & 21 st, 2014

Direct Component Project Evaluation Form

The DEP has four main regulations that relate to pipeline construction.

Transcription:

FINAL Phase I Qualitative Assessment Report U.S. Army Qualitative Operational Range Assessments Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District Printed on recycled paper May 2008

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The United States (U.S.) Army is conducting qualitative assessments at operational ranges to meet the requirements of Department of Defense policy and to support the U.S. Army Sustainable Range Program. The operational range qualitative assessment (hereinafter referred to as Phase I Assessment) is the first phase of the U.S. Army (ORAP). This Phase I Assessment evaluates the operational range area at Papago Park Military Reservation to assess whether further investigation is needed to determine if potential munitions constituents of concern (MCOC) are or could be migrating off-range at levels that may pose an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment. In conducting the Phase I Assessment, MCOC sources, potential off-range migration pathways, and potential off-range human and ecological receptors are evaluated as appropriate. Papago Park Military Reservation is located within the metropolitan area of Phoenix, Arizona in the northeast portion of Maricopa County. The installation is bordered by 52 nd Street on the western side, Oak Street on the northern side, and by Papago Park recreation area to the east and south. McDowell Road transects the installation from east to west. Papago Park Military Reservation is composed of 419.95 acres which includes the headquarters and operational focal point of the Arizona Army National Guard (AZARNG), the 107 th Air Control Squadron, and the Arizona Military Institute. The installation consists of an armory which houses the Joint Forces Headquarters for AZARNG, and several other administrative buildings. The installation also includes four operational ranges consisting of two small arms ranges, a land navigation course, and a rappel training site across 103.82 acres. Despite the utilization of small caliber munitions at Papago Park Military Reservation, the migration of on-range MCOC to off-range receptors is unlikely. A pathway via surface water exists; however, there are no human and ecological receptors which interact with the pathway. Groundwater pathways are hindered by limited precipitation, underlying geology, and high evapotranspiration rates. The four operational ranges at Papago Park Military Reservation are categorized as Unlikely. Unlikely Five-Year Review Four ranges at Papago Park Military Reservation are categorized as Unlikely, totaling 103.82 acres. These ranges consist of two small arms ranges, a land navigation course, and a rappel training area. Ranges where, based upon a review of readily available information, there is sufficient evidence to show that there are no known releases or source-receptor interactions that could present an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment are categorized as Unlikely. Ranges categorized as Unlikely are required to be re-evaluated at least every five years. Re-evaluation may occur sooner if significant changes (e.g., change in range operations, site conditions, regulatory changes) occur that affect determinations made during this Phase I Assessment. Table ES-1 summarizes the Phase I Assessment findings. EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. ES-1

Table ES-1: Summary of Findings and Conclusions for Papago Park Military Reservation Category Unlikely Total Number of Ranges and Acreage Source(s) Pathway(s) Human Receptors Two operational ranges; 2.52 acres Two operational ranges; 101.30 acres Small caliber munitions Limited source limited military munitions use Surface water in the man-made drainage basin at the base of the small arms impact berm None due to the limited use of the obstacle course and the limited amount of water in the wash Not evaluated (limited source was identified) Ecological Receptors None due to the location of the wash, limited amount of water in the wash, and the location of ecological receptors Conclusions and Rationale Re-evaluate during the five-year review. No receptors were identified. Re-evaluate during the five-year review. Limited source was identified. EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. ES-2

ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS amsl Above Mean Sea Level ARID-GEO Army Range Inventory Database-Geodatabase AZARNG Arizona Army National Guard bgs Below Ground Surface CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CSM Conceptual Site Model DoD Department of Defense DODI Department of Defense Instruction DODIC Department of Defense Identification Code E Ecological receptors identified. (This refers to range grouping; pathway designation always precedes E designation.) ES Engineering-Sciences, Inc. GW Groundwater pathway identified. (This refers to range grouping; M designation always precedes GW designation.) H Human receptors identified. (This refers to range grouping; pathway designation always precedes H designation.) IRP Installation Restoration Program LS Limited Source M Munitions used. (This refers to range grouping; M designation always precedes applicable pathway.) MCOC Munitions Constituents of Concern MMRP Military Munitions Response Program NG Nitroglycerin NGB National Guard Bureau ORAP PU Pathway unlikely or incomplete. (This refers to range grouping; M designation always precedes PU designation.) RFMSS Range Facility Management Support System ROTC Reserve Officers Training Corps SW Surface water pathway identified. (This refers to range grouping; M designation always precedes SW designation.) U.S. United States USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers USACHPPM United States Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine USAEC United States Army Environmental Command USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency USGS United States Geological Survey WP White Phosphorus F Degrees Fahrenheit EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. iv

64th Phase I Qualitative Assessment Papago Park Military Reservation, AZ Figure 1-1 General Location of Papago Park Military Reservation Indian School Lafayette 56th Goldwater Goldwater 40th Thomas 44th 52nd Oak Scottsdale 68th Scottsdale Phoenix Mcdowell Galvin Papago Park Galvin College Van Buren Mckellips Washington 143 Phoenix Sky Harbor Intl Center Sky Harbor 202 Curry Tempe 0 1 R io S o Priest lado Salt River Rio Salado Miles 52nd Mill Rural Installation Data Installation Boundary Operational Range Area Non-Operational Area Highways Interstate Highway Highway Major Road Hydrology Rivers/Streams Waterbody Data Sources: ARID-GEO, June 2005 ESRI, StreetMap, 2006 Date:...May 2008 Prepared By:EA Engineering,Science, and Technology Prepared For:...U.S. Army Contract Number:... W912DR-05-D-0008