Engaging Medicare Medicaid Enrollees: Insights from Three Financial Alignment Demonstration States

Similar documents
Managed Long-Term Services and Supports: Landscape from Readiness Review to Ongoing Oversight

A Snapshot of Uniform Assessment Practices in Managed Long Term Services and Supports

Welcome and Introductions

Commonwealth Coordinated Care Update April 2014

New Delivery Systems for Long Term Services and Supports: How States are Diving into Affordable Care Act Opportunities

Strengthening Long Term Services and Supports (LTSS): Reform Strategies for States

Improving Care for Dual Eligibles Opportunities for Medicare Managed Care Plans

Karen Kimsey, Deputy Director, Complex Care & Services Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services National Association of Medicaid Directors

MassHealth Updates. Massachusetts Health Care Training Forum July 2014

Engaging Providers in Integrated Care Programs

Designing a Medicaid ACO Program: Insights from Trailblazing States

Healthcare Service Delivery and Purchasing Reform in Connecticut

Strategies for Training Care Coordinators and Care Managers in Integrated Programs

Early Insights From Ohio s Demonstration to Integrate Care and Align Financing for Dual Eligible Beneficiaries

Medicaid Managed Care 2012 Fiscal Analysts Seminar August 30, 2012

kaiser medicaid and the uninsured commission on O L I C Y

ABC's of Managed Care and What It Might Mean for Home & Community Based Services

State Innovations in Value-Based Care: ACOs and Beyond

Lessons Learned from the Dual Eligibles Demonstrations. Real-Life Takeaways from California and Other States

Implementing Coordinated Care for Dual Eligibles: Conflicts and Opportunities Prepared by James M. Verdier Mathematica Policy Research

FORGING SUCCESSFUL PARTNERSHIPS BETWEEN HEALTH PLANS AND STATES

Thursday, June 2, 2011, 2-3:30 PM ET

Connecting Value-Based Services to Whole Person Care

Department of Health Care Services

Health Plans and LTSS. NASUAD April 20,2011 Mary Kennedy, ACAP Medicare Vice President 1

Evaluating Commonwealth Coordinated Care: The Experiences of Individuals Dually Eligible for Medicare and Medicaid

2016 Edition. Upper Payment Limits and Medicaid Capitation Rates for Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE )

Engaging Consumers in Care

1500 Capitol Ave. Sacramento, CA 95814

NC TIDE SPRING CONFERENCE April 26, NC Department of Health and Human Services Medicaid Transformation and the 1115 Waiver

ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services payment and practice management

STRATEGIES FOR INCORPORATING PACE INTO STATE INTEGRATED CARE INITIATIVES

Dual eligible beneficiaries and care coordination. Mark E. Miller, Ph. D.

Plan Payment Requirements for Existing Providers of Care

Medicaid Innovation Accelerator Project

The Who, What, When, Where and How of Ombudsman Services for Home Care Consumers

Medicaid Innovation Accelerator Program (IAP)

VIRGINIA S MEDICARE AND MEDICAID INTEGRATION EXPERIENCE 12/2/2016

Best Practices. SNP Alliance. October 2013 Commonwealth Care Alliance: Best Practices in Care for Frail and Disabled Medicare Medicaid Enrollees

ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services practice management

Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission (MACPAC) February 2013 Meeting Summary

NC TIDE 2016 Fall Conference November 14, Department of Health and Human Services NC Medicaid Reform Update

ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services payment and practice manaement

Building a Culture of Engagement for Medicare- Medicaid Enrollees: Health Plan Approaches

February 26, Dear State Health Official:

Prescription Monitoring Program:

Partnering with SHIPs to Improve Care for Dually Eligible Beneficiaries

Patient-Centered Primary Care

Transforming Louisiana s Long Term Care Supports and Services System. Initial Program Concept

Medicaid Managed Care. Long-term Services and Supports Trends

The benefits of the Affordable Care Act for persons with Developmental Disabilities

Early Insights from One Care: Massachusetts Demonstration to Integrate Care and Align Financing for Dual Eligible Beneficiaries

Driving Change with the Health Care Spending Benchmark

State roles & responsibilities in Medicaid managed long-term care

MyCare Ohio Ombudsman Update

Medicare Medicaid Alignment Initiative (MMAI) November 14, 2014

Higher Education Employment Report

What is Managed Care and DSRIP?

Options for Integrating Care for Dual Eligible Beneficiaries

MassHealth Updates. Massachusetts Health Care Training Forum July 2013

The L.A. County Coordinated Care Initiative Stakeholder Workgroup. June 19, p.m.

State Approaches to Providing Health-Related Supportive Services through Medicaid

Select Medicare Advantage Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans in California

Role of State Legislators

LEGISLATIVE REPORT NORTH CAROLINA HEALTH TRANSFORMATION CENTER (TRANSFORMATION INNOVATIONS CENTER) PROGRAM DESIGN AND BUDGET PROPOSAL

Medicaid Reform: The Opportunities for Home and Community Based Providers. All Rights Reserved

Improving Health Status through Behavioral Health Interventions

Leveraging Care Coordination Organizations in Medicaid Health Homes: The Washington Way

State of California Health and Human Services Agency Department of Health Care Services

Improving Care for Dual Eligibles through Health IT

National Perspective No Wrong Door System. Administration for Community Living Center for Medicare and Medicaid Veterans Health Administration

Proposal for New York State FIDA Replacement-Future of Integrated Care i

MEDICARE-MEDICAID CAPITATED FINANCIAL ALIGNMENT MODEL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: SOUTH CAROLINA-SPECIFIC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

Forces of Change- Seeing Stepping Stones Not Potholes

How Technology-Based-Startups Support U.S. Economic Growth

States Roles in Rebalancing Long-Term Care: Findings from the Aging Strategic Alignment Project

Commonwealth Coordinated Care Enrollment Application Form

California s Coordinated Care Initiative

MMW Webinar Medicare & MMAI/MLTSS Updates December 14, 2016

NCQA PCMH Recognition: 2017 Standards Preview. Tricia Barrett Vice President, Product Design and Support January 25, 2017

Patient-Centered. Medical Homes (Presentation Handout)

The Use of NHSN in HAI Surveillance and Prevention

CDC s 6 18 Initiative: Informational Webinar for Prospective States and Territories

Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) Readiness Kit

Show me the Money How Medicaid Can Pay for Language Services. Webinar: May 31, 2007

Upgrading Voter Registration in Florida

Improving Care and Lowering Costs for Dual Eligible Beneficiaries

Low-Cost, Low-Administrative Burden Ways to Better Integrate Care for Medicare-Medicaid Enrollees

NCQA s Patient-Centered Medical Home Recognition and Beyond. Tricia Marine Barrett, VP Product Development

Transforming Payment for a Healthier Ohio

Disease Management for the Institutionalized Patient Population

CONNECTICUT: ECONOMIC FUTURE WITH EDUCATIONAL REFORM

NYS Value Based Payments (VBP):

Building Blocks to Health Workforce Planning: Data Collection and Analysis

BEST PRACTICES IN LIFESPAN RESPITE SYSTEMS: LESSONS LEARNED & FUTURE DIRECTIONS

WITH REAL-WORLD PERSPECTIVE

Practice Advancement Initiative (PAI) Using the ASHP PAI Ambulatory Care Self-Assessment Survey

MEDICARE-MEDICAID CAPITATED FINANCIAL ALIGNMENT MODEL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: CALIFORNIA-SPECIFIC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

Home Health Agency (HHA) Medicare Margins: 2007 to 2011 Issue Brief July 7, 2009

COMMONWEALTH COORDINATED CARE PLUS. A Managed Long Term Services and Supports Program

Transcription:

Engaging Medicare Medicaid Enrollees: Insights from Three Financial Alignment Demonstration States August 27, 2014 Implementing New Systems of Integration for Dual Eligibles (INSIDE) is supported by The Commonwealth Fund and The SCAN Foundation. www.chcs.org

Welcome and Introductions Alexandra Kruse Senior Program Officer Center for Health Care Strategies Carolyn Ingram Senior Vice President Center for Health Care Strategies 2

A non profit health policy resource center dedicated to advancing access, quality, and cost effectiveness in publicly financed health care Priorities: (1) enhancing access to coverage and services; (2) integrating care for people with complex needs; (3) advancing quality and delivery system reform; and (4) building Medicaid leadership and capacity. Provides: technical assistance for stakeholders of publicly financed care, including states, health plans, providers, and consumer groups; and informs federal and state policymakers regarding payment and delivery system improvement. Funding: philanthropy and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 3

Agenda I. Welcome and Introductions II. The Financial Alignment Initiative III. Massachusetts OneCare Program Experience IV. Ohio s Integrated Care Delivery System Experience V. Virginia s Commonwealth Coordinated Care Experience VI. Questions and Answers 4

Movement to Integrated Care Financial Alignment Initiative Dual Eligible Special Needs Plan Platforms (AZ) Stepped Approach Medicaid Managed Long Term Services and Supports (NJ) Demonstration to Align Administrative Functions (MN) 5

Financial Alignment Initiative: Joint State Federal Demonstrations for Medicare Medicaid Enrollees* CAPITATED CA, IL, MA, MI, MN,** NY, OH, RI, SC, TX, VA, WA** Joint procurement of highperforming health plans Three way contract: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, state, health plan Single set of rules for marketing, appeals, etc. Blended payment, built in savings Voluntary, passive enrollment with opt out provisions MANAGED FFS CO, CT, WA** FFS providers, including Medicaid health homes or accountable care organizations Seamless access to necessary services Quality thresholds and savings targets *As of August 2014 **MN has administrative alignment model with D SNPs; WA has both a capitated and MFFS model 6

One Care: MassHealth plus Medicare MassHealth Demonstration to Integrate Care for Dual Eligibles August 27, 2014 Erin Taylor

Contents Enrollment Experience Early Indicators Project Strategies for Continuing to Boost Enrollment Post-Enrollment Engagement Activities 8

Total Enrollment October 1, 2013 first effective date Effective August 1 total number of enrollees: 18,067 6,068 self-selection enrollments (34%) 11,999 auto-assignment enrollments (66%) 5,333 round 3 auto-assignment (July 1, 2014) 2,827 round 2 auto-assignment (April 1, 2014) 3,839 round 1 auto-assignment (January 1, 2014) Enrollment Penetration as of August 1 (% eligible enrolled) 19% overall 24%-37% in auto-assignment counties MassHealth issues monthly reports on enrollment activity to provide general information to stakeholders 9

Opt Outs As of August 1, 2014, 24,775 people had opted out of One Care Opt out figures include some people who may be ineligible Of approximately 95,700 individuals who received a One Care enrollment packet, roughly 26% have chosen to opt out 10

Early Analysis of Enrollment Activity Early Indicators Project (EIP) Analyzing early quantitative and qualitative indicators to assess the perceptions and experiences of enrollees and those who have opted out Distinct from One Care programmatic evaluation or quality measures Key data sources Focus groups Surveys Data reports, including enrollment data, Customer Service, Serving the Health Information Needs of Everyone (SHINE), which is the State Health Insurance Counseling and Assistance Program in Massachusetts 11

Findings: Early Opt-ins Members had good understanding of One Care, found One Care enrollment information easy to understand Members found the enrollment process fairly easy Found MassHealth Customer Service to be helpful Made efforts to confirm that providers, pharmacies and medications would be covered before enrolling Reasons and hopes for enrolling into One Care Less expensive/no co-payments Having a care coordinator Better dental coverage One insurance/one insurance card 12

Findings: Early Opt-outs Knowledge of and information about One Care Not enough information was provided/too generic Wanted more information about providers and medications covered under One Care Deciding to not enroll into One Care Members felt more secure having Medicare and Medicaid Several had providers that were not in One Care Members expressed concern they may Lose current doctors and medications Not get care when needed Have to wait for approvals for treatment or for appointment One Care is new and unknown it doesn t have any history behind it, so you really don t know what is going to happen in a year or two. 13

Strategies for Continuing to Boost Enrollment Ongoing targeted outreach efforts to members, providers, advocates and community organizations Provider outreach strategy Advertising in journals and trade publications Newsletter and e-communication Direct mail Community-based organization outreach sessions Encouraging plans to continue developing provider networks Passive enrollment assignment approach Video Vignettes 14

Video Vignettes MassHealth has developed video vignettes to share enrollees personal experiences with One Care The stories bring to life some of the key features and benefits of One Care from the perspective of enrollees, including Care coordination Care team Independent living No co-payments MassHealth will use these stories to continue to raise awareness of One Care 15

Post-Enrollment Engagement Activities Plan challenges post-enrollment Unable to reach some enrollees Most hard-to-reach people are enrolled through autoassignment, but some enrolled through self-selection For members not utilizing care, plans don t have provider relationships to leverage to make connections Some people are experiencing homelessness or living in temporary housing, and may not receive information Some members may not read or understand notices Some individuals are unwilling to engage in care planning Assessment completion and continuity of care period for members who disenroll (either voluntarily or due to eligibility issues) and re-enroll 16

Post-Enrollment Engagement Activities Hard-to-Reach Enrollees Plans are using different approaches to reach people, including Using claims history and Rx data to reach out to providers Working closely with all providers to try to get the most updated contact information Partnering with pharmacies and leaving a please contact us card for members when a script is filled Calling members early in the month before cell phone minutes run out on prepaid phone services MassHealth works closely with the plans to understand how they are implementing strategies to meet enrollee assessment and care planning requirements with hard-to-reach members 17

Post-Enrollment Engagement Activities Addressing Operational Challenges MassHealth is working with CMS to develop guidance to address: Enrollees unwilling to engage in the care planning process Members who enroll and disenroll (or are disenrolled because of a change in eligibility status) within 90 days Guidance will be consistent with contractual obligations 18

Visit us at www.mass.gov/masshealth/onecare Email us at OneCare@state.ma.us

MyCare Ohio Ohio s Integrated Care Delivery system Harry Saxe, Project Manager

Ohio Department of Medicaid The Basics MyCare Ohio consists of 7 regions and 29 of 88 Ohio counties The regions are centered on major metropolitan hubs (Columbus, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Toledo, Dayton) The first region went live on May 1, 2014, followed by three each on June 1 and July 1 Enrollment for Medicaid benefits was required, enrollment for Medicare is optional 8/28/2014 21

Ohio Department of Medicaid Enrollment Process Multiple instructional mailings to eligible beneficiaries over a 90 day period encouraging self selection of a MyCare plan for Medicaid Multiple state sponsored regional forums, webinars and conference calls Outreach/education via the Dept. of Aging and the Aging and Disability Resource Networks Forums conducted by the MyCare managed care plans At 30 days from go live date if no plan selected, auto assignment initiated Auto assignment predominant 90 days to change plans after region go live date All enrollment handled by contracted enrollment broker 8/28/2014 22

Ohio Department of Medicaid Enrollment Status 100,000+ enrolled to date Roughly 14% of the 100,000 + have chosen to have the MyCare plan provide both Medicare & Medicaid benefits To date, 488,000+ claims paid = $208 million Medicaid passive suspended until Fall 2014 to avoid conflicting with Medicare enrollment processes Newly eligible beneficiaries can still enroll but will not be required to do so 8/28/2014 23

Ohio Department of Medicaid Enrollment Status Beneficiaries who have not chosen a MyCare Ohio plan for their Medicare benefits by mid October will be notified of their assignment to their current MyCare plan for Medicare benefits They can decline that enrollment and continue with their current Medicare arrangement For those who do not decline, as of 1/1/15 their MyCare Ohio plan will begin providing both benefit packages 8/28/2014 24

Ohio Department of Medicaid Enrollment Successes Creation of an enrollment workgroup to assist with: drafting and vetting of letters, developing instructional material conducting focus groups organizing regional forums for beneficiaries and providers Transitioning to an implementation workgroup to continue supporting the demonstration Use of local stakeholders to support the project 8/28/2014 25

Ohio Department of Medicaid Enrollment Successes The development of provider specific collaboratives working one on one with the MyCare Ohio plans to address issues of concern to their members and the population they serve Use of one to one counseling to assist beneficiaries when choosing a plan The development of productive working relationships with CMS, the plans, advocates and provider associations 8/28/2014 26

Ohio Department of Medicaid Enrollment Challenges Large numbers of independent providers with little or no familiarity with claims submission to an MCP, steep learning curve requiring hundreds, perhaps thousands of hours of training by plans ongoing effort Plans adjusting to new provider types and unique and often complex FFS reimbursement/billing methodologies Unexpected developments (i.e., the primary billing agent for independent providers dropping the service with little notice) Enrollment/disenrollment flexibility inherent in the demonstration design contributes to instability 8/28/2014 27

Ohio Department of Medicaid Enrollment Challenges No test environment for enrollment Providers adjusting to the MCP payment cycle vs. a FFS cycle Larger than expected volume of calls to the enrollment hotline created delays Complex and nuanced nature of these projects 8/28/2014 28

Ohio Department of Medicaid Lessons Learned to Date There is never enough engagement with providers or beneficiaries There is never enough time or resources to do the above Flexibility in pursuit of benefit integration is an absolute necessity Expect the unexpected, you won t be disappointed Prepare for criticism Be realistic with yourself and others about expectations Prepare for a marathon, not a sprint

Virginia s Early Dual Demonstration Enrollment Experience August 27, 2014 Elisabeth Smith, RN CCC Program Analyst

Virginia Overview Early Enrollment Experiences Retain Enrollments &Re engage Disenrollments Challenges and Successes with Engaging Enrollees 31

Early Enrollment Experiences Opt outs are beneficiaries exercising choice Majority of opt outs in each region come directly before or directly after passive enrollment Opt out numbers change frequently & are not yet representative of total population 32 32

Early Enrollment Experiences CCC Region Total Population Active Opt ins Auto Assign Optouts Optout % Region Central Virginia 21505 1363 12937 4950 23.02% Northern Virginia 13634 196 XX 583 4.28% Roanoke 9635 286 6726 1351 14.02% Tidewater 18522 1055 9315 6648 35.89% Western/ Charlottesville 5957 205 3907 736 12.36% Total Members 69253 3190 32888 14268 20.60% Total population reflects all beneficiaries eligible for CCC at the beginning of the month. This number includes those who may lose Medicaid eligibility or become newly excluded by the end of this month. The opt out rate is calculated based on the total population. 33 33

Early Enrollment Experiences Providers attempting mass opt outs Respond with memo on beneficiary choice Drafted NF letter to share with bene/rep Targeted trainings 34 34

Retain Enrollments & Re engage Disenrollments Ensure Care Continues Investigate Disenrollment Reasons Consider the Provider Factor 35 35

Ensure Care Continues (Retain) Built in continuity of care period prevents break in services Work with IT to identify and resolve any systems issues quickly 36 36

Investigate Disenrollment Reasons (Retain and Re engage) Working with plans to understand disenrollment reasons Report frequency and reasons to State and CMS Exploring disenrollment may be a new process, working with the health plans for scripting and policy creation Enrollment broker gathering disenrollment information 37 37

Consider the Provider Factor (Retain & Re engage) Single case agreements allow enrollees to continue with current provider Providers holding out on contracting creates enrollment confusion or worry for beneficiary Engaging providers in multiple settings and methods Training by provider type Weekly call opportunities On site training by request Regional Townhalls 38 38

Engaging Enrollees Challenges Contact information for beneficiaries is only as accurate as what is provided to the local eligibility worker Phased approach of passive enrollment brings on large numbers of beneficiaries at one time. Can create assessment backlogs monitor through CMT dashboard. 39 39

Engaging Enrollees Successes Engagement from stakeholder advocates with population experience. Mental Health and disability advocates are assisting with education and focus groups Medical Transition Report gives MMPs last 2 years Medicaid services and provider contacts to increase ability to engage providers (Challenge: currently no Medicare data) 40 40

Office of Coordinated Care Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services 600 E. Broad Street, Suite 1300 Richmond, VA 23219 CCC@dmas.virginia.gov 41

Resources Moving Toward Integrated Marketing Rules and Practices for Medicare and Medicaid Managed Care Plans. M. Soper and R. Weiser. Integrated Care Resource Center, July 2014. Building State Capacity to Implement Integrated Care Programs for Medicare Medicaid Enrollees. M. Soper. Center for Health Care Strategies, July 2013. Three State s Paths to Medicaid Managed Long Term Care; Florida, New Jersey and Virginia. S. Barth and B. Ensslin. Center for Health Care Strategies, July 2013. Options for Attracting and Retaining Enrollment in Financial Alignment Initiatives for Medicare Medicaid Enrollees. Integrated Care Resource Center, April 2013. Innovations in Integration: State Approaches to Improving Care for Medicare Medicaid Enrollees. M. Soper and B. Ensslin. Center for Health Care Strategies, February 2013. 42

Contact Us Carolyn Ingram Cingram@chcs.org Alexandra Kruse Akruse@chcs.org 43

Visit CHCS.org to Download practical resources to improve the quality and cost effectiveness of Medicaid services Subscribe to CHCS e mail updates to learn about new programs and resources Learn about cutting edge efforts to improve care for Medicaid s highest need, highest cost beneficiaries www.chcs.org 44