Subject USE OF FORCE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT. 14 March By Order of the Police Commissioner

Similar documents
Subject TRANSFER/DETAIL/FILLING VACANCIES. 8 February By Order of the Police Commissioner

It is the Department policy to promptly and thoroughly investigate alleged misconduct involving employees.

Subject POLICE BADGES. 25 March By Order of the Police Commissioner

PURCHASE OF SERVICE WEAPONS

PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 12.18

B POST Application Fee Log Avery. D. Niles, Commissioner

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

DOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE Personnel Investigations Complaint Handling / Investigative Procedures

TYPE OF ORDER NUMBER/SERIES ISSUE DATE EFFECTIVE DATE General Order /14/2014 7/16/2014

EARLY LEARNING COALITION OF OSCEOLA COUNTY

Subject CASINO ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT. 1 July By Order of the Police Commissioner

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

EFFECTIVE DATE: 10/04. SUBJECT: Primary Care Nurse Practitioners SECTION: CREDENTIALING POLICY NUMBER: CR-31

FIELD TRAINING EVALUATION PROGRAM

STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF ALASKA STATE TROOPERS

PROCEDURE-STUDENT RECORDS

PATROL RIFLE PROGRAM

ATLANTA AREA COUNCIL MERIT BADGE COUNSELOR APPLICATION PROCEDURE

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

VOLUME 3 - CHAPTER 4 SERVICE REVIEWS, PUBLIC COMPLAINT PROCESS, AND PERSONNEL INVESTIGATIONS

HONOLULU POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY HUMAN RESOURCES AND TRAINING

Policy 6.08 FIELD TRAINING OFFICERS

COMMISSION FOR FLORIDA LAW ENFORCEMENT ACCREDITATION, INC.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCEDURE

Administration of the Child Care Assistance Program

Request for Proposal PROFESSIONAL AUDIT SERVICES. Luzerne-Wyoming Counties Mental Health/Mental Retardation Program

THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK Classified Civil Service Position Description

HONORING DECEASED PERSONNEL

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCEDURE

When MIOSHA Enforcement Visits

Subject DEPARTMENTAL VEHICLE CRASHES. 23 September By Order of the Police Commissioner

Administration of the Child Care Assistance Program

Review of Invoice Processing Controls - Wackenhut s Security Services Contract

NHSGG&C Referring Registrants to the Nursing & Midwifery Council Policy

MANAGING AND CERTIFYING EFFORT ON SPONSORED PROJECTS

Alaska Child Care Grant Program. Policies and Procedures Manual

GENERAL ORDER DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA I. BACKGROUND

Subj: CIVILIAN TIME AND ATTENDANCE FOR THE BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL

February 19, Internal Audit Report Child Care Licensing Department of Health and Human Services

CREDENTIALING Section 5

SECTION: OPERATIONS OPR-281

ORDER TYPE: NEED TO KNOW. PURPOSE The purpose of this general order is to establish basic operational guidelines for members of the patrol division.

ASSE International Seal Control Board Procedures

Appendix 5A. Organization Registration and Certification Manual. WORKING DRAFT-August 26, 2014

CREDENTIALING Section 8. Overview

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RULES FOR THE PERSONAL ACTIVITY REPORT SYSTEM (PAR)

Plan of Development Review Process County of Henrico, Virginia

Serious Notable Occurrence:. Serious notable occurrences include;

Missouri National Guard Technician Personnel Regulation 451 Office of the Adjutant General 2302 Militia Drive Jefferson City, MO October 2002

Telephone and ed complaints:

Subject LESS-LETHAL MUNITIONS AND CHEMICAL AGENTS. DRAFT 31 August By Order of the Police Commissioner

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Procedures for Transfer of Members Between Reserve and Regular Components of the Military Services

THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK Classified Civil Service Position Description

RULE 10 CLASSIFIED SERVICE RANKS AND GRADES AND APPOINTED OR ASSIGNED POSITIONS IN THE FIRE AND POLICE DEPARTMENTS

USE FOR REFERENCE ONLY Military Services Complaint Processing Procedures USE FOR REFERENCE ONLY

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT MONITOR LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR THE REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING MARCH 31, 2008

(This document reflects all provisions in effect on October 1, 2017)

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCEDURE DRAFT. Title: Incident Operations Center and Incident Review Procedures

BOARD OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES SOLE SUPERVISORY DISTRICT FRANKLIN-ESSEX-HAMILTON COUNTIES MEDICAID COMPLIANCE PROGRAM CODE OF CONDUCT

RESEARCH PROJECT REVIEW GUIDELINES (2018)

TELECOMMUTING POLICY

Urbana Police Department. Policy Manual

STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

Personnel Investigative Model

PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 10.4

ARTICLE V DISCIPLINE

CODE OF MARYLAND REGULATIONS (COMAR)

Practitioners may be recredentialed at any time, but in no circumstance longer than a 36 month period.

FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE (FMLA) OVERVIEW **********Keep this Overview for your own reference**********

PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 7.16

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCEDURE

Regulatory Compliance Policy No. COMP-RCC 4.60 Title:

Defines adult foster care and license categories Defines licensee

Provider Rights. As a network provider, you have the right to:

POLICY SUBJECT: POLICY:

REGISTERED NURSES ACT REGISTRATION AND LICENSING OF NURSES REGULATIONS

Centerwide System Level Work Instruction

BROWARD OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL

CODE OF MARYLAND REGULATIONS (COMAR)

CITY OF HOOD RIVER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 211 Second St., Hood River, OR Phone: (541)

Applicable To: Central Records Unit employees, Records Section Communications, and SSD commander. Signature: Signed by GNT Date Signed: 11/18/13

STANDARDS & MANUALS. Accreditation Revised February 2015 Interim Changes Highlighted

ADM WRITTEN DIRECTIVE SYSTEM

The Plan will not credential trainees who do not maintain a separate and distinct practice from their training practice.

GUIDE TO SERVICES Service Coordination

2018 State Combined Charitable Campaign - Charity Application

Supervising Investigator COPA JOB ANNOUNCEMENT

Emory University Research Administration Services (RAS) Standard Operating Procedure

FLSA Classification Problems. Advanced FLSA Regional Workshops. Chapel Hill. February 28 March 1, 2017

Safety Best Practices Manual

Central Monitoring Cases

TITLE: LAST REVISION:

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AERODROMES AND AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES. Foreword

Please Note: Please send all documentation related to the credentialing portion of this documentation to:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES

C. The individual must be capable of assisting in the selection, training, and supervision of the attendant s scheduled activities.

INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING FORM OPWDD 147 (Revised 07/2011)

Sierra College ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE AP 5521

MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE. General Order

Transcription:

Policy 725 Subject USE OF FORCE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT Date Published Page 14 March 2017 1 of 11 By Order of the Police Commissioner POLICY Thorough Review. When members use force, all levels of supervision shall thoroughly review, investigate, document, and assess the actions taken to determine if the use of force was consistent with Baltimore Police Department (BPD) policy and training. GENERAL 1. All reviews and assessments are to be completed within the stated timeframes. If an extension is needed it must be submitted to the appropriate Commander prior to the deadline. 2. Vacation, extended sick leave, or any other absence from work is not considered a valid reason for delaying the review process. 3. Use of force incidents shall be documented and reviewed by a permanent-rank supervisor not involved in the incident. Use of Force Reviews First-Line Permanent-Rank Supervisor 1. Thoroughly review incidents of Level 1 and Level 2 Reportable Force for consistency with Policy 1115, Use of Force as pertains to: 1.1. Training, and 1.2. Submission of required documentation and related evidence. 2. Address any discrepancy, confusion, or lack of information with supplementary statements from officers, witnesses, or subjects prior to completing a Blue Team entry. 3. Document in Blue Team any issue that cannot be resolved. 4. Immediately refer misconduct or potential criminal conduct to Command and the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). 5. Complete the Use of Force review for Level 1 and Level 2 Reportable Force and forward to the lieutenant of the member who used reportable force via Blue Team within 72 hours of the incident.

Policy 725 USE OF FORCE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 of 11 6. Immediately notify Command of issues that will delay the submission and completion of the Use of Force review. Lieutenant 1. Thoroughly examine the supervisor's review of Level 1 and Level 2 Reportable Force for consistency with Policy 1115, Use of Force, as pertains to training and the submission of required documentation and related evidence. 2. Return for correction to the first-line supervisor any Use of Force reviews that are incomplete or contain errors. Address any discrepancies, confusion, or lack of relevant information. 3. If necessary, re-classify a Use of Force review to the appropriate Reportable Force Level and return the Use of Force review to the supervisor for necessary action. 4. Document in Blue Team any counseling given, training referrals made, or recommendations for discipline related to the member's actions or the supervisor's Use of Force review. 5. Immediately refer misconduct or potential criminal conduct to Command and OPR. 6. Complete the Use of Force review for Level 1 and Level 2 Reportable Force and forward it to the Executive Officer/Captain via Blue Team within 72 hours of receipt. 7. Immediately notify Command of issues that will delay the submission and completion of the Use of Force review. Executive Officer/Captain (If applicable to the command) 1. Critically examine the Use of Force review of Level 1 and Level 2 Reportable Force for consistency with Policy 1115, Use of Force as pertains to training and submission of all required documentation and related evidence. 2. Return for correction to the lieutenant any Use of Force reviews that are incomplete or contain errors. Address any discrepancies, confusion, or lack of relevant information. 3. If necessary, re-classify a Use of Force review to the appropriate Reportable Force Level and return the Use of Force review to the lieutenant for necessary action. 4. When it appears the findings of the Use of Force review is not supported by a preponderance of the evidence, recommend changes to the findings after consultation with the investigating supervisors and document the specific evidence or analysis supporting the change. 5. Arrange and document in Blue Team any counseling given, training referrals made, or disciplinary action taken related to the member's actions or the supervisor's and lieutenant's review. 6. Immediately refer misconduct or potential criminal conduct to the Commanding Officer and OPR. 7. Complete Use of Force review for Level 1 and Level 2 Reportable Force within five (5) days of receipt and forward to the Commanding Officer via Blue Team.

Policy 725 USE OF FORCE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT Page 3 of 11 8. Immediately notify command of issues that will delay the submission and completion of the Use of Force review. Commanding Officer 1. Critically examine all supervisors review of Level 1 and Level 2 Reportable Force for consistency with Policy 1115, Use of Force as pertains to training and submission of all required documentation and related evidence. 2. Return for correction to the Executive Officer/lieutenant any reviews that are incomplete or contain errors. Address any discrepancies, confusion, or lack of relevant information. 3. If necessary, re-classify a Use of Force review to the appropriate Reportable Force Level and return the Use of Force review to the Executive Officer/lieutenant for necessary action. 4. Arrange and document in Blue Team any counseling given, training referrals made, or disciplinary action taken related to the member's actions or the supervisor's, lieutenant's, or captain s review. 5. Immediately refer misconduct or potential criminal conduct to the Division Commander and OPR. NOTE: Complete Level 1 Reportable Force within a period not exceeding 30 days from the date Reportable Force was used in Blue Team and forward to the Use of Force Coordinator File (Level One Force). 6. Complete Level 2 Use of Force reviews within five (5) days of receipt, and forward the Use of Force review to UFAU (Level Two Force) via Blue Team. NOTE: Complete all reviews of Level 2 Reportable Force within a 16-day time period from the date Reportable Force was used. Document in Blue Team an explanation for a delay beyond the 16-day submission period for Level 2 Reportable Force reviews. 7. Any Level 1 or Level 2 Reportable Force reviews that require additional time for completion or closure will require the submission of a written request for extension (see Appendix A, Force Extension Request Form 16/25). 7.1. Submit the Force Review Extension Request form to the Division Chief for approval prior to the submission deadline. 7.2. Attach the approved/disapproved Force Review Extension Request forms to the Blue Team entry for the incident. 8. Level 1 or Level 2 Reportable Force supervisory and command reviews shall not exceed a 45- day period for closure, even if an extension is granted.

Policy 725 USE OF FORCE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT Page 4 of 11 Division Chief 1. Critically review and approve/disapprove Force Review Extension Requests. 2. Attach the reason for any disapproval, immediately return the request to the submitting commander. Use of Force Assessment Unit UFAU will conduct an administrative assessment of Level 2 Reportable Force incidents. Following the final assessment, the UFAU Commander will close the assessment and the command review within IAPro system. UFAU Member 1. Assess Level 2 Reportable Force incidents and reviews for conformity with Use of Force policy and all other policies, guidelines, laws, and ordinances associated with the force used. 2. Document and return incomplete reviews on a Use of Force Assessment Form. 3. Document errors found in the review and forward to a UFAU supervisor for verification. 4. Immediately inform a UFAU supervisor of any actions that appear to involve misconduct by any officers. 5. Forward all completed assessments to the UFAU supervisor for review. UFAU Supervisor 1. Verify the existence of any errors or omissions in the Use of Force review and document them in the Corrective Recommendations Section of the UOF Assessment Form. 2. Immediately inform the UFAU Commander of any actions that appear to involve misconduct by any officers. 3. Forward all completed assessments to the UFAU Commander for review. 4. Monitor the Blue Team system for initial submissions of Use of Force reviews by supervisors. 5. Track the progress of Use of Force reviews within Blue Team and immediately notify the UFAU Commander of any Use of Force reviews that are beyond the 16-day submission period without an approved extension. UFAU Commander 1. Review the findings of the member and supervisor on the Use of Force Assessment Form and document a concurrence or make additional recommendations in the Corrective Recommendation Section. 2. Assign a date for the completion of corrections and receipts of missing or incomplete documentation.

Policy 725 USE OF FORCE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT Page 5 of 11 3. Return the review along with corrective recommendations to the Commanding Officer via Blue Team. 4. Determine if any action involved possible misconduct by any officer and notify and forward the review to OPR for investigation. 5. Close all completed assessments and reviews. 6. Send an email notification to Division Chiefs whose commands have not forwarded Level 2 Use of Force reviews within the 16-day submission period and have not requested an extension. 7. Forward a listing of all outstanding corrections and delinquent Use of Force reviews to the Compliance, Accountability and External Affairs (CAEAD) Commander or designee. 8. Refer Level 2 Reportable Force reviews to the Performance Review Board (PRB) when they suggest a need for changes in training, policy, or equipment. UFAU Administrative Coordinator 1. Monitor the Use of Force Coordinator file within Blue Team daily. 2. Review closed files for Commander's Conformity Opinion and Approval for closure. Re-route reviews to commands without conformity opinions or Commander's approval for closure. 3. Immediately notify Division Chiefs/Inspectors, the Internal Audit Commander and the Chief of CAEAD of any Command reviews beyond a 30-day period of initial reporting in Blue Team. 4. Transfer all closed reviews from the Blue Team system into IAPro, and close the review. APPENDIX A. Force Review Extension Request Form 16/25 B. Use of Force Assessment C. Use of Force Review Submission Table ASSOCIATED POLICIES Policy 1115, Policy 724, Use of Force Performance Review Broad RESCISSION Remove and recycle/destroy Policy 725, Use of Force Review and Assessment, dated 9 August 2016. COMMUNICATION OF POLICY This policy is effective on the date listed herein. Each employee is responsible for complying with the contents of this policy.

Policy 725 USE OF FORCE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT Page 6 of 11 APPENDIX A Force Review Extension Request Form 16/25

Policy 725 USE OF FORCE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT Page 7 of 11 APPENDIX B Use of Force Assessment, page 1

Policy 725 USE OF FORCE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT Page 8 of 11 APPENDIX B Use of Force Assessment, page 2

Policy 725 USE OF FORCE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT Page 9 of 11 APPENDIX B Use of Force Assessment, page 3

Policy 725 USE OF FORCE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT Page 10 of 11 APPENDIX B Use of Force Assessment, page 4

Policy 725 USE OF FORCE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT Page 11 of 11 APPENDIX C Use of Force Review Submission Table