Patients in Health Decisions

Similar documents
Engaging patients and their family in shared decision making

Shared Decision Making, Ethics, and Shared Responsibility

Shared Decision Making in Clinical Practice

Don t just listen, Co-produce! November 18 th 2013 Swales stadium

Webinar Series. Effective and Compassionate Communication for Informed, Shared Decision-Making Tuesday, May 12, Audience Reminders

National Standards for Patient Decision Aids: CSAC Meeting

Leveraging Shared Decision Making to Manage Population Health Partners HealthCare s Lessons Learned Gloria Stone Plottel, MS, MBA, Founder and CEO,

Shared Decision Making When there is more than one right option

SHARED DECISION MAKING

An Introduction Shared Decision Making in Clinical Practice

Shared Decision Making

Shared Decision Making

With any surgery, consent

Shared Decision Making, Ethics and Shared Responsibility. Ben Moulton JD, MPH Senior Legal Advisor Lecturer in Health Law HSPH

Treatments with adequate scientific evidence about outcomes

Engaging patients using an interprofessional. approach to shared decision

Law, Shared Decision Making & Health Disparities

Shared Decision Making in Clinical Practice

SHARED DECISION MAKING WHY PATIENTS PREFERENCES MATTER

Modifying Unwarranted Variations In Health Care: Shared Decision Making Using. Patient Decision Aids

PATIENT- CENTERED CARE: BOTH IN INDIVIDUAL CONVERSATIONS WITH PATIENTS AND IN PRACTICE TRANSFORMATION EFFORTS

Schedule of Benefits - Indemnity Group - MEDFORD AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT Benefit Year: January 1st through December 31st Effective Date: 01/01/2016

Schedule of Benefits - HMO Group - MEDFORD AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT Benefit Year: January 1st through December 31st Effective Date: 01/01/2016

Rural-Relevant Quality Measures for Critical Access Hospitals

Kaiser Permanente Group Plan 301 Benefit and Payment Chart

Schedule of Benefits - Point of Service MOSINEE SCHOOL DISTRICT Benefit Year: January 1st Through December 31st Effective Date: 07/01/2016

Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies: Improving Benefit-Risk Counseling Between Providers and Patients 4/14/2016

Isabelle Scholl 1,2*, Allison LaRussa 1, Pola Hahlweg 2, Sarah Kobrin 3 and Glyn Elwyn 1

Opportunities for the Use of Decision Aids in Primary Care

Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. A NONPROFIT HEALTH PLAN - HAWAII REGION

Supplemental Table 1. Summary of Studies Examining Interpersonal Continuity and Care Outcome

Dear New Patient, Once again, we would like to thank you for choosing us as your primary health care provider. We look forward to working with you.

Open comparisons of health care performance

SERVICES COVERAGE LIMITS/ EXCLUSIONS Alcohol, Drug, and Substance Abuse Services

Creating a person-centered transgender care program Kaiser Permanente

SHARED DECISION MAKING

Print Guardian Name (If not patient) DOB: Patients Name: (Last, First, MI): Circle One: - - / / Mailing Address: Apt. #: City: State: Zip Code:

Benefits. Benefits Covered by UnitedHealthcare Community Plan

MEDICARE By Peter G. Pan

2016 Medical Plan Comparison Chart

Covered (blood, blood components, human blood products, and their administration) Covered (Some restrictions)

Can We Lower Low-Value Care? Policy Measures and Lessons in Australia, Canada, England, France, and Germany

Leveraging Wellness Visit with Medicare: Improving Income and Patient Outcomes

National Priorities for Improvement:

Fast Facts 2018 Clinical Integration Performance Measures

ENVIRONMENT Preoperative evaluation clinic. Preoperative evaluation clinic. Preoperative evaluation clinic. clinic. clinic. Preoperative evaluation

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: APPENDICES TO MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATIVE RULES, CHAPTER 4654

FLORIDA MEDICAL CLINIC, P.A. Your Life, Our Specialty

PacifiCare SignatureValue Advantage Offered by PacifiCare of California

Schedule of Benefits - CENTRAL HMO Group CITY OF MARSHFIELD Benefit Year: January 1st through December 31st Effective Date: 01/01/2017

OBSTETRICAL ANESTHESIA

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Your Responsibilities. $2,000 per family. $1,600 per individual $3,200 per family

Your Responsibilities. $1,500 per family $250 copayment per visit

HOME BANK - S2395 NON-GRANDFATHERED CONSUMER DRIVEN HEALTH PLAN BENEFIT SHEET

Shared Decision Making & Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions

Benefit Explanation And Limitations

Patient Engagement, Shared Decision Making and PCNA Educational Materials

Wait Time Information in Priority Areas: Definitions

Benefit Explanation And Limitations

How the Overuse of Medical Care is Wrecking Your Health and Your State s Budget

The health coaching approach: A different way to talk with patients. Dr Andrew McDowell Director of Health Coaching The Performance Coach

DELAWARE FACTBOOK EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Health Sciences Centre, Team C, Dr. M. Wells (Breast and Hernia) Medical Expert

$6,550 per individual $13,100 per family

Dr Gale Bearman Brisbane Gender Clinic

Informed Consent: when autonomy & beneficence collide

Introduction. Singapore. Singapore and its Quality and Patient Safety Position 11/9/2012. National Healthcare Group, SIN

Core Metrics for Better Care, Lower Costs, and Better Health

New Options in Chronic Care Management

UnitedHealthcare SignatureValue TM Offered by UnitedHealthcare of California

HEALTH CENTER. Can Health Centers Do Differently When It Comes to Patient Engagement?

UnitedHealthcare SignatureValue TM Offered by UnitedHealthcare of California

MERCY MEDICAL CENTER - DUBUQUE TRADITIONAL PPO PLAN $10/20%/40% RX PROVIDED BY PREFERRED HEALTH CHOICES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2015

Medicare & Medicaid. William Kassler, MD Chief Medical Officer Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Boston, MA

Shared Decisionmaking To Improve Patient Safety, Education, and Empowerment

20th Century Health Care 21st Century Health Care

Shared decision-making

UnitedHealthcare SignatureValue TM Offered by UnitedHealthcare of California

Summary of benefits Health Net. seniority plus green. Benefits effective January 1, 2009 H0562 Medicare Advantage HMO

Title: Minimal improvement of nurses' motivational interviewing skills in routine diabetes care one year after training: a cluster randomized trial

HEALTH NET S IT S YOUR LIFE WELLSITE It s Your Life online tools and resources plus the personal support of Decision Power SM

UnitedHealthcare SignatureValue TM Offered by UnitedHealthcare of California

Implementing shared decision making in

UnitedHealthcare SignatureValue TM Offered by UnitedHealthcare of California

Meaningful Use: a Primer

Corporate Partners Program

NAME MEDICAL HISTORY DATE Past Medical History: (Please circle all that apply): NONE Anxiety Coronary Artery Disease HIV/AIDS Seizures Arthritis Depre

UnitedHealthcare SignatureValue TM Offered by UnitedHealthcare of California

Y0021_H4754_MRK1427_CMS File and Use PacificSource Community Health Plans, Inc. is a health plan with a Medicare contract

MASTERING SHARED DECISION MAKING

Implementing Patient Decision Aids for Increased Patient Engagement and Reduced Costs. David Arterburn MD, MPH Group Health Research Institute

can MAGIC SDM help? The extraordinary potential of primary care to improve mental health and wellbeing

Medicare Plus Blue SM Group PPO. Summary of Benefits. Michigan Public School Employees Retirement System

Page 1 of 5 1/4/17. Print Guardian Name (If not patient) DOB: Circle One: - - Patients Name: (Last, First, MI):

BARIATRIC SURGERY SERVICES POLICY

Incorporating Shared Decision Making into Informed Consent Documentation

Your Out-of-Pocket Type of Service

$1,500 per individual $3,000 per family

Shared Decision Making

Transcription:

Strategies for Engaging Patients in Health Decisions Laura Boland, MSc, SLP-C, PhD(c) Population Health University of Ottawa October 19 th, 2016

Overview Shared decision making Decision coaching Patient decision aids Simulated encounter Discussions

Getting Started What are some difficult health decisions that patients face in your practice? owhat makes them difficult? ohow can we support patients?

What Makes Decisions Hard? The Grey Zones! Benefits of 3000 health interventions Editorial team of BMJ Clinical Evidence 2014 http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com/x/set/static/cms/efficacy-categorisations.html

Supporting Patients: Patient Engagement Figure from: Carmen 2013

Paternalistic (Doctor/Team Decides) Shared Decision Making Autonomous (Patient Decides) Shared decision making (SDM) represents a middle ground where both the clinician and the patient partner in making the decision.

Information exchange: 2 experts Two way flow of information Partner in reaching agreement on the best treatment plan

Steps Legare et al., 2010

Why Shared Decision Making? Ethical and legal imperative Patient safety and high quality service delivery Unwarranted practice variations Improves patient outcomes Less likely to blame healthcare providers for poor outcomes Promotes optimal decisions in situations where results cannot be guaranteed O Connor 1998, 2003; Bekker 1999; Wennberg 2002; Keisler & Auerbach, 2006

Relevance to Nurses/ HCP Patients want nurses to: Advocate for them Mediate and explain information Listen to patient preferences Communicate patient preferences to physician and healthcare team Decision coaches Joseph-Williams, 2014

Decision Coaching Clinical strategy to support SDM with patients facing decisions where there is not one best answer

Decision Coaching o Trained healthcare professional o Help guide patient through decision making process o Non-directive and individualized guidance o Evidence: patient knowledge participation satisfaction Stacey et al., 2013

Patient Decision Aids Clinical tools to facilitate SDM

Patient Decision Aids Inform o A decision point o Evidence/facts: condition, options, benefits, harms o Communicate probabilities Clarify values o Patient experience o Benefits/harms matters most o Facilitate communication Support a process o Guide in steps in deliberation/communication o Provide worksheets, list of questions Stacey et al., 2014 Cochrane Review

Exercise and Discussion

Groups of 2 or 3 Person #1: think of a real decision Person #2: support decision making process using the OPDG Other: Observe

Discussion Do you think decision coaching with the PtDA changed the conversation? What did you like or dislike about the OPDG? Other comments?

Topics in Decision Aids Trials (N=115) Medication (n=36) 10 hormone replacement therapy 3 atrial fibrillation anti-coagulants 3 cardiovascular 3 diabetes 2 osteoporosis 2 chemotherapy 2 breast cancer prevention 2 osteoarthritis knee Hypertension Screening (n=46) 15 Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) 7 BRCA1/2 genetic 11 colon cancer 6 prenatal 2 mammography 2 diabetes Colon cancer genetic Cervix cancer Stress testing for chest pain Surgery (n=23) 4 mastectomy +1 reconstruction 4 prostatectomy 4 hysterectomy 2 prophylactic BRCA1/2 2 coronary revascularization dental orchiectomy for advanced prostate ca Back Obstetrics (n=6) 2 vaginal birth after cesarean termination breech labour analgesia embryo transplant Other (n=4) Hepatitis B and influenza vaccine Autologous blood donation Cystic Fibrosis Transplant Referral Stacey et al., 2014 Cochrane Review

Impact Patient Decision Aids Improve decision quality 14% higher knowledge scores 79% more accurate risk perception 49% better match between values & choices Reduce decisional conflict (6%) Help undecided to decide (41%) Patients less passive in decisions Potential to reduce overuse 20% surgery 14% PSA 27% HRT Stacey et al., 2014 Cochrane Review

Decision Aid Formats 1. Print Passive or interactive 2. DVD/Video Passive 3. Online/computerbased Passive or interactive Stacey et al., 2014 Cochrane Review

Condition Specific Decision Aids International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration To enhance the quality and effectiveness of patient decision aids by establishing a shared evidenceinformed framework for improving their content, development, implementation, and evaluation. IPDAS Steering Committee: Glyn Elwyn & Dawn Stacey (Co-Leads), M Barry, N Col, A Coulter, K Eden, M Härter, M Holmes-Rovner, H Llewellyn-Thomas, V Montori, N Moumjid, M Pignone, R Thomson, L Trevena, R Volk, T van der Weijden Stacey et al., 2014 Cochrane Review

http://decisionaid.ohri.ca

Using Decision Aid in Practice: Video Exercise http://www.decision.chaire.fmed.ulaval.ca/en/tool-box/shared-decision-making-video/#c510

OPTION tool The clinician draws attention to an identified problem as one that requires 1 a decision-making process Yes No The clinician states that there is more than one way to deal with the identified problem 2 ( equipoise ) Yes No The clinician assesses patient s preferred approach to receiving information 3 to assist decision making (e.g. discussion, read printed material, assess graphical data, Yes No drawings, use videotapes or other media) 4 The clinician lists options, which can include the choice of no action Yes No The clinician explains the pros and cons of options to the patient (taking no action is an 5 option) Yes No The clinician explores the patient s expectations (or ideas) about how the problem(s) are to 6 be managed Yes No The clinician explores the patient s concerns (fears) about how the problem(s) are to be 7 managed Yes No 8 The clinician checks that the patient has understood the information Yes No The clinician offers the patient explicit opportunities to ask questions throughout the 9 decision-making process Yes No 10 The clinician elicits the patient s preferred level of involvement in decision making Yes No 11 The clinician indicates the need for a decision making (or deferring) stage Yes No 12 The clinician indicates the need to review the decision (or deferment) Yes No Elwyn et al, 2003

Discussion What behaviours described in the OPTION grid did you observed during the clinical encounter?

Key Messages To engage patients in shared decision making: Make explicit the decision Provide balanced information on options Ask patients what matters most TO MAKE SHARED DECISION MAKING A HABIT, PRACTICE IT EVERYDAY

Wrap up Thank you!

Surgery with lower mortality rate / higher likelihood of colostomy Effect of Doctor, what would you do? 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Colon Cancer Surgical Decision 76% 62% Choice for patient Choice for self Conclusion: Physicians make different choices for themselves than for their patients. Ubel et al, 2011

Informed consent vs SDM Patient/HCP discussion about treatment options Informed consent process Shared decisionmaking (SDM) Risks and benefits Options / alternatives Probabilities of various outcomes Clarification of patient values, preferences and personal situation May use a decision aid to help inform and guide decision Informed choice made in partnership between patient / family and HCP Page, 2015

When are Decision Aids Used?