Introduction to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. GSA Region 10 Northwest/ Arctic June 22-23, 2004

Similar documents
National Historic. Preservation Act. A Guidebook on Section 106 August United States marine corps

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

THE SECTION 106 REVIEW PROCESS

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Environmental Trends Course Cultural Resources

Wildland Fire Assistance

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

WHEREAS, FEMA also may perform its own Undertakings pursuant to this Agreement; and

1 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Conservation Law Enforcement Program Standardization

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Report Documentation Page

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

WHEREAS, Mn/DOT has been asked to participate in consultation for and to be an invited signatory to this Programmatic Agreement (PA); and

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

The Use of Sikes Act Cooperative Agreements for Implementing INRMP Projects

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Information Technology

The Landscape of the DoD Civilian Workforce

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Report No. DODIG Department of Defense AUGUST 26, 2013

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

The Security Plan: Effectively Teaching How To Write One

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

National Continuity Policy: A Brief Overview

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

at the Missile Defense Agency

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

World-Wide Satellite Systems Program

AIR FORCE CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Acquisition. Air Force Procurement of 60K Tunner Cargo Loader Contractor Logistics Support (D ) March 3, 2006

Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) Patient Care Platform: Expanding Global Applications and Impact

Financial Management

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Report No. D July 25, Guam Medical Plans Do Not Ensure Active Duty Family Members Will Have Adequate Access To Dental Care

MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS EAST-MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE ORDER A

Report No. D-2011-RAM-004 November 29, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Projects--Georgia Army National Guard

Report to Congress on Historic Army Quarters

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

Mission Task Analysis for the NATO Defence Requirements Review

The Air Force's Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Competitive Procurement

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

MCAS BEAUFORT SUSTAINABLE RANGES BRIEF MCAS BEAUFORT COMMUNITY PLANS AND LIAISON OFFICE (CP&L)

PART 21 DoD GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS GENERAL MATTERS. Subpart A-Introduction. This part of the DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations:

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

ENDANGERED SPECIES ENCROACHMENT RELIEF

Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

Report No. D May 14, Selected Controls for Information Assurance at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency

Report No. D February 22, Internal Controls over FY 2007 Army Adjusting Journal Vouchers

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

TITLE: The impact of surgical timing in acute traumatic spinal cord injury

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Analysis of the Operational Effect of the Joint Chemical Agent Detector Using the Infantry Warrior Simulation (IWARS) MORS: June 2008

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process

Tim Haithcoat Deputy Director Center for Geospatial Intelligence Director Geographic Resources Center / MSDIS

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

INSTRUCTION. Department of Defense. NUMBER September 18, 2008 Incorporating Change 1, November 21, 2017 USD(AT&L)

Adverse Effect to the Childers House on the Fort Campbell Army Installation

Acquisition. Diamond Jewelry Procurement Practices at the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (D ) June 4, 2003

Veterans Affairs: Gray Area Retirees Issues and Related Legislation

The Effects of Outsourcing on C2

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

APPENDIX A PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR MINOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

Report No. DODIG September 11, Inappropriate Leasing for the General Fund Enterprise Business System Office Space

Preliminary Observations on DOD Estimates of Contract Termination Liability

HISTORIC RESOURCES SMARTIES

Report No. D June 16, 2011

Systems Engineering Capstone Marketplace Pilot

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

SPECIAL REPORT Unsurfaced Road Maintenance Management. Robert A. Eaton and Ronald E. Beaucham December 1992

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act: Background and Issues

Transcription:

Introduction to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act GSA Region 10 Northwest/ Arctic June 22-23, 2004

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 01 AUG 2004 2. REPORT TYPE N/A 3. DATES COVERED - 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Introduction to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) GSA Region 10 Northwest/ Arctic 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADM002111. Department of Defense Conservation Conference. Held in Savannah, Georgia on August 22-27, 2004, The original document contains color images. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UU a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 113 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Preserving Our Nation s Heritage

Mid 19 th c. Ann Pamela Cunningham: Mount Vernon Ladies Association

1853: Office of the Supervising Architect is established in the Treasury to design and construct civilian federal buildings.

1908: The Antiquities Act: First legislation protecting our national heritage.

Office of Supervising Architect was the Largest architectural practice in the nation. Designed hundreds of federal buildings.

1935: Works Progress Administration 115,000 Federal Buildings constructed Tennessee Valley Authority

1947: The National trust for Historic Preservation is created

1948: GSA is created as a procurement and service agency. Goal was to standardize procurement practices and provide uniformity

Urban renewal of the 1950s - 60s

Guiding Principles for Federal Architecture - 1961 The policy shall be to provide facilities in an architectural style and form which is distinguished and which will reflect the dignity, enterprise, vigor, and stability of the American National Government. Major emphasis should be placed on the choice of designs that embody the finest contemporary American architectural thought.

Post-War Federal Buildings Cultural climate dominated by Operations Research, Quantitative Systems Analysis, Efficiency Studies, etc. A/E Selection criteria increasingly focused on issues not related to architectural quality.

Understanding the Intent of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 Promote Federal Agency Preservation stewardship Programs (Section 110 and 111) Refine the National Register of Historic Places nomination process strengthen Federal Preservation protection Process (Section 106) Create an Administrative supervisory Structure (ACHP) Create Financial preservation Incentives (e.g., funding of SHPO/THPOs; grants for preservation)

Section 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act [16 U.S.C. 470h-2]

GSA responsibilities under Section 110 Responsible to nominate eligible properties to the National Register. Consult with SHPO/THPOs, Native American groups, and the Council to minimize adverse effects of Federal activities on historic properties. Establish procedures for preparing Building Preservation Plans (BPP) for Register and register eligible properties. Investigating proposed sites for construction of federal buildings to identify historic or culturally significant prperties. Agency must have a Fedral Preservation Officer (FPO) who is responsible for coordination of cultural resource management and compliance with NHPA.

Section 111 of the National Historic Preservation Act [16 U.S.C. 470h-3]

GSA responsibilities under Section 111 GSA is responsible for seeking adaptive use of historic properties not currently needed for Federal agency purposes. Solicitation and selection procedures for leasing GSA controlled historic property for non-federal use shall give preference to those with viable mechanisms for their protection (I.e. financial, past experience and commitment) All leases shall contain terms and conditions to ensure consistency with Federal Preservation standards. The RHPO shall be consulted in the development of historic building lease solicitations, RFQs, marketing strategies, and selection criteria. A sublease, assignment, amendment or encumbrance of any lease issued under 111 must be approved by RHPO, Regional counsel and Portfolio Manager.

EXECUTIVE ORDERS EO 13006 EO 11593 EO 13287 EO 12512

GSA Policies and Directives applicable to Historic properties GSA real Property Policies Final Rule (41 CFR Parts 102-71, et al.) [December 13,2002] GSA Administrative Directive (ADM) 1020.2 : GSA Procedures for Historic Properties [October 19,2003] RHPO Responsibilities

Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act [16 U.S.C. 470f]

36 CFR Part 800 Protection of Historic Properties

Requirements of Section 106 [16 U.S.C. 470f; 36 C.F.R. part 800] Prior to taking action on an undertaking, Federal agencies must: Take into account the effects on historic properties; and Afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation a reasonable opportunity to comment

Part 800 protection of historic properties Subpart A Purposes and Participants [800.1-2] Subpart B The Section 106 Process [800.3-13] Subpart C Program Alternatives [800.14-16]

Subpart A Purpose and Participants [Section 800.1-2]

Federal Agency Official [800.2(a)]

WHO are the consulting Parties? [800.2(c)] STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER TRIBAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER INDIAN TRIBES/NATIVE HAWAIIANS/ ALASKA NATIVES ACHP NATIONAL PARK SERVICE PROJECT APPLICANT LOCAL GOVERNMENT public

State Historic Preservation Officer [800.2(c)(1)]

Tribal historic preservation officers (THPOs) [800.2(c)(I)(a)]

Indian Tribes and Native Hawaiian Organizations [800.2(c)(2)]

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation [800.2(b)]

National Park Service

Project Applicant Applicants for federal Assistance, permits, licenses, and other approvals are entitled to consult. Project developer (lease/build, ground lease,transfer) Project contractor tenants

Representatives of Local Governments [800.2(c)(3)] Although Federal actions are not required to comply with local restrictions governing new construction or building alteration, GSA policy is to consult and cooperate with local government planning commissions.

The Public [800.2(d)] Public opinion is essential to informed federal decisionmaking Regulations allow federal agencies to use their in-house procedures for seeking public input such as under NEPA.

Subpart b The Section 106 process The current 36 CFR Part 800 is the fourth edition. Each revision has reduced the Councils role in the review of undertakings, recognizing the growing capability of agencies and participants in the process. [Section 800.3-13]

Public involvement Initiate Section 106 Process Establish undertaking Identify appropriate SHPO/THPO Plan to involve the public Identify other consulting parties NO UNDERTAKING/ NO POTENTIAL TO CAUSE EFFECTS UNDERTAKING MIGHT AFFECT HISTORIC PROPERTIES Public involvement Identify Historic Properties Determine scope of efforts Identify historic properties Evaluate historic significance HISTORIC PROPERTIES MAY BE AFFECTED NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES AFFECTED Public involvement Assess Adverse Effects Apply criteria of adverse effect NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES ADVERSELY AFFECTED HISTORIC PROPERTIES ARE ADVERSELY AFFECTED MEMORANDUM OF Public Resolve Adverse Effects AGREEMENT involvement Continue consultation FAILURE TO AGREE

Four Steps to Enlightenment Step 1: Initiate Step 2: Identify Step 3: Assess Step 4: Resolve

Public involve ment STEP 1 Initiate Establish undertaking Identify appropriate SHPO/THPO Plan to involve the public Identify other consulting parties NO UNDERTAKING/ NO POTENTIAL TO CAUSE EFFECTS Historic Properties May be Affected

Establish UNDERTAKING Project, activity, or program under direct or indirect jurisdiction of a Federal agency Includes activities that Are carried out by or on behalf of agencies Received Federal funds Required a Federal permit, license, or approval Are regulated under del;egated federal programs.

Timing of Review Process must be initiated early in project development Broad range of alternatives should be available for consideration. GSA clients should be properly informed about consultation requirements Realistic expectations concerning project schedules must be discussed. Section 106 must be completed prior to Approval of the expenditure of Federal funds Issuance of any license

Determining Potential to Cause Effects Based on the potential of the undertaking as a type of activity Prospective- no need to know whether historic properties are present Knowledge about specific properties irrelevant. Assumptions about effect must be validated by proceeding review.

Identify appropriate SHPO/THPOs Consult with your RHPO Never contact SHPO/THPO directly RHPO are responsible for maintaining working relationship with agencies.

Involve the public Consult with RHPO Make documents, materials and other data available, to the extent possible, concerning the undertaking. Involve early so comments can be incorporated in GSA's consideration of alternatives. Provide adequate notification times.

Identify other consulting parties In addition to those already mentioned: Local non-profit historic preservation organization State wide non-profit historic preservation organization National non-profit historic preservation organizations Other federal agencies

Public involvement Step 2: Identify Determine Scope of Efforts Identify Historic Properties No Historic Properties Adversely Affected Evaluate Historic Significance Historic Properties May be Affected

Determine scope of efforts The program responsible for the project or action shall notify the RHPO early in the project planning so that an appropriate identification study can be performed. Project schedule and scope of effort shall allow time for consultation w/shpo/thpo and representatives of native American groups.

Determining the Area of Potential Effe (APE) APE is geographic area(s) in which undertaking may cause alterations in character or use of historic properties Knowledge of historic properties not needed to establish the APE APE should include all areas of potential direct or indirect effects APE may include more than one area Agency consults with SHPO/THPO to determine the area of potential effects.

In consultation with the RHPO Gather Information on Properties in the APE GSA is normally required to perform an evaluation study to obtain sufficient documentation to apply the criteria for evaluation to previously unidentified historic and cultural properties. RHPO will consult with SHPO/THPO

No Historic Properties Affected Appropriate when GSA has determined (through a consensus determination or determination by the Keeper) that no historic properties are present or there are historic properties present, but the undertaking will not have any effect on them

Historic Properties Properties included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places. The term eligible for inclusion includes both properties formally determined as such by the Keeper and all other properties that meet the National Register criteria.

The National Register of Historic Places The NRHP is a listing of districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects significant in American History, architecture, archeology, and culture maintained by the Secretary of the Interior under authority of Section 2(b) of the Historic Sites Act of 1935, 49 Stat. 666, 16 U.S.C. 462, and Section 101(a)(1) of the NHPA, 16 U.S.C. 470a(a)

Age eligibility National register criteria generally requires that a property be 50 years or older to be eligible for the NR. GSA has established a threshold of 45 years for assessing the eligibility of a property. GSA s intent is to prevent project delays and increased design and construction costs due to new compliance requirements affecting a project in development.

Five Categories of historic properties as determined by the NPS: Buildings Structures Sites Objects Districts

Five Categories: Buildings Structures Sites Objects Districts

Five Categories: Buildings Structures Sites Objects Districts

Five Categories Buildings Structures Sites Objects Districts

Five Categories Buildings Structures Sites Objects Districts

National Register Criteria A. Association with events B. Association with people C. Distinctive design/construction Distinctive construction characteristics Work of a master Artistic value A distinguishable entity D. Data potential

National Register Criteria A. Association with events B. Association with people C. Distinctive design/construction Distinctive construction characteristics Work of a master Artistic value A distinguishable entity D. Data potential

National Register Criteria A. Association with events B. Association with people C. Distinctive design/construction Distinctive construction characteristics Work of a master Artistic value A distinguishable entity D. Data potential

National Register Criteria A. Association with events B. Association with people C. Distinctive design/construction Distinctive construction characteristics Work of a master Artistic value A distinguishable entity D. Data potential

Levels of HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE NATIONAL REGIONAL LOCAL

Elements of INTEGRITY Properties must have integrity of (as appropriate) Location Setting Design Materials Workmanship Feeling and association

Reasonable and Good Faith Identification Efforts Agency should take into account Past studies Magnitude and nature of the undertaking Degree of federal involvement Nature and extent of potential effects Likely nature and location of historic properties Applicable standards and guidelines Confidentiality concerns

GSA s Identification efforts Each GSA Region has a program to nominate eligible properties to the national register and to complete Bpps for register and register eligible properties under its jurisdiction, including leased buildings occupied by GSA.

Public involvement Step 3: Assess Apply criteria of adverse effect No Historic Properties Adversely Affected Historic Properties Are Adversely Affected

Adverse Effect (AE) Process Apply criteria of AE Agency must provide documentation to SHPO/THPO, consulting parties and make documentation available to public. SHPO/THPO or Council may comment within 30 days on agency s finding. If agency maintains its findings despite objections, Section 106 complete.

Criteria of Adverse Effect Undertaking may: alter characteristics that qualify property for the National Register diminish the property s integrity Alteration may be direct or indirect Agency should consider: All qualifying characteristics of the property and site Reasonably foreseeable effects Cumulative effects

Examples of Adverse Effect Physical destruction or alteration Alteration inconsistent with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties Relocation of a property Changes in the character of a property s use or setting

Examples of Adverse Effect (continued) Introduction of incompatible visual, atmospheric or audible elements (I.e. new construction) Neglect and deterioration Transfer, lease, or sale out of Federal ownership without adequate preservation covenants (I.e. disposal)

AE Process Apply criteria of AE Agency must provide documentation to SHPO/THPO, consulting parties and make documentation available to public. SHPO/THPO or Council may comment within 30 days on agency s finding. If agency maintains its findings despite objections, Section 106 complete.

Documentation for Findings of Adverse Effect Description of undertaking and APE, including photos, maps, and drawings as necessary Descriptions of affected historic properties and efforts to identify Description of effects and statement of why the criteria of adverse effect is applicable Views of consulting parties and public.

Finding of no adverse effect (NAE) Appropriate when the agency: Believes none of the undertakings effects meet the criteria of adverse effect; or Modifies project or agrees to conditions of adverse effects

AE Process Apply criteria of AE Agency must provide documentation to SHPO/THPO, consulting parties and make documentation available to public. SHPO/THPO or Council may comment within 30 days on agency s finding If agency maintains its findings despite objections, Section 106 complete.

Agency proposes finding of AE or NAE in consultation with the SHPO/THPO SHPO/THPO has 30 days to respond to agency findings. They may agree or disagree If they agree with AE then Step 4 Resolve is initiated. If they disagree with AE then further consultation is needed. If they agree with NAE then 106 is completed. If they disagree with NAE then further consultation is needed.

Disagreement on Findings of No adverse Effect Agency must consult if there is an objection with parties. resolve or refer the finding to the ACHP Council will decide whether to comment within 15 days. ACHP comments are not binding on the agency. But!!

Public involvement Step 4: Resolve Continue consultation Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) or Programmatic Agreement (PA) Failure To Agree Council Comment

Process Notify Council Involve additional consulting parties/public Consider alternatives Prepare documentation Negotiate mitigation plan

Notify Council Agency must notify the Council regarding undertaking. Agency must invite Council to participate when: The agency wants council involvement A NHL is adversely affected A PA is proposed Council must comment within 45 days Council provides opportunity for input from agency, consulting parties, and the public Council members and the Chairman provide formal written comment to the head of agency.

Criteria for ACHP Involvement Council is likely to enter a review when there are: substantial impacts on important properties important questions of policy or interpretation procedural problems issues of concern to Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations

Process Notify Council Involve additional consulting parties/public Consider alternatives Prepare documentation Negotiate mitigation plan

Involve additional consulting parties/public Besides the SHPO/THPO and the Council, involve the parties previously identified in consultation.

Process Notify Council Involve additional consulting parties/public Consider alternatives Prepare documentation Negotiate mitigation plan

Consider alternatives Project modifications can greatly assist in lessening AE Supply as much information as possible to the Council on alternatives.

Process Notify Council Involve additional consulting parties/public Consider alternatives Prepare documentation Negotiate mitigation plan

Documentation Requirements Agency must give Council and consulting parties description of: Undertaking and APE Identification steps and affected historic properties Project effects and why the criteria of adverse effects are applicable Views of consulting parties and public.

Process Notify Council Involve additional consulting parties/public Consider alternatives Prepare documentation Negotiate mitigation plan

Examples of Mitigation Measures Alternative design Alternative location Limiting magnitude Rehabilitating some historic properties Planning for preservation and maintenance

Examples of Mitigation Measures (continued) Moving historic properties Marketing properties for donation, sale, or lease Documenting a historic property before destroying it Archeological data recovery

Memorandum of Agreement Outcome of consultation when agreement can be reached Governs the undertaking and all of its parts Legally binding document Specifies agreed upon alternatives and/or mitigation Identifies parties responsible for implementing MOA and its implementation evidences agency completion of Section 106.

Special Situations

Foreclosure of Council Comment Agencies must complete Section 106 review prior to approving project Otherwise, Council may determine its opportunity to comment is foreclosed Foreclosure finding: Goes from Council membership to head of agency Signals that Council believes agency has violated law

Subpart C Program Alternatives [800.14-16]

Programmatic Agreements Special type of agreement either: To implement an agency program or To address adverse effects of complex or multiple undertakings PAs for complex or multiple projects Develop like MOAs PAs for regional or national programs Consultation required w/council, NCSHPO, SHPO/THPO and the public

Post-review Discoveries Unexpected discovery of effects to historic properties after project work has begun: Can be discovery of a previously unidentified property Can be discovery of unforeseen effects to a known property Provisions to Address discoveries only apply if project previously reviewed

Planning for Discoveries Agencies encouraged to plan for discovery situations If discoveries are likely, the Project s PA, MOA or no adverse effect finding must include process for dealing with discoveries.

Planning for emergencies Agencies encouraged to develop tailored procedures for emergency response Must be developed in consultation with appropriate parties and approved by the Council in order to substitute for standards review process.

www.achp.gov