Patient Portal Success

Similar documents
Use of Information Technology in Physician Practices

Part 2: PCMH 2014 Standards

HIE & Interoperability: Roadmap to Continuum of Care Michael McPherson MU Coordinator KDHE

The History of Meaningful Use

Emerging Tools and Technology for Consumer Engagement in Health Care

Updates to the EHR Incentive Programs Jason Felts, MS, CSCS HIT Practice Advisor

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

YOUR HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE

Advanced Use of Health Information Technology to Support New Models of Care

Go! Knowledge Activity: Meaningful Use and the Hospital EHR

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

CMS Modifications to Meaningful Use in Final Rule. Slide materials and recording will be available after the webinar

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule CPeH Advocacy Opportunities

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

KPMG Digital Health Pulse April 2017

Meaningful Use of an EHR System

= AUDIO. Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. An Important Reminder. Mission of OFMQ 9/23/2015. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor

Agenda. Meaningful Use: What You Really Need to Know. Am I Eligible? Which Program? Meaningful Use Progression 6/14/2013. Overview of Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Preparing an Advocacy Strategy. The Consumer Partnership for ehealth

Under the MACRAscope:

Behavioral Health Information Network of Arizona

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

Version 11.5 Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) 2014 Reference Guide for Sevocity Users

Conversation Starters: Research Insights from Clinicians and Patients on Conversations About End-of-Life Care and Wishes

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

Meaningful Use Stage 2

Meaningful Use Stage 2

INTERGY MEANINGFUL USE 2014 STAGE 1 USER GUIDE Spring 2014

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

How Giving Patients Their Data Can Lead to Patient Activation

ACO Practice Transformation Program

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Overview

Final Meaningful Use Stage 3 Requirements Released August 2018

Fundamentals of Health Workflow Process Analysis and Redesign: Process Analysis

Office of the Chief Privacy Officer. Privacy & Security in an App Enabled World HIMSS, Tuesday March 1, 2016, Las Vegas, NV

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physicians February 2013

ACO: Ready or Not? Presented by: Robert C. Tennant Vice President. May 10, 2012

Meaningful Use Is a Stepping Stone to Meaningful Care

Table 1: Limited Access Summary of Capabilities

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

Connecticut Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Flexibility Checklist for Eligible Professionals for Meaningful Use Last Revision: May 27, 2015

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

Recent and Proposed Rule Changes for Meaningful Use

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

Disclaimer This webinar may be recorded. This webinar presents a sampling of best practices and overviews, generalities, and some laws.

during the EHR reporting period.

CPC+ Application Process

Advancing Care Information- The New Meaningful Use September 2017

Improving Clinical Flow ECHO Collaborative Change Package

Patient Electronic Access Modified Stage 2: Objective 8

Sevocity v Advancing Care Information User Reference Guide

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

NEXTGEN PATIENT PORTAL (NextMD) DEMONSTRATION

CHCANYS NYS HCCN ecw Webinar

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

Practice Director Modified Stage MU Guide 03/17/2016

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Grove Medical Associates, P.C. A Case Study in Continuous Quality Improvement

Spring User Conference May Sandestin, FL Detailed Agenda

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

Christopher W. Shanahan, MD, MPH, FACP

GE Healthcare. Meaningful Use 2014 Prep: Core Part 1. Ramsey Antoun, Training Operations Coordinator December 12, 2013

Meaningful Use FAQs for Public Health

Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible and Critical Access Hospitals

INTERGY MEANINGFUL USE 2014 STAGE 2 USER GUIDE Spring 2014

What Canadians Think Do we really know?

Overview of the Changes to the Meaningful Use Program Called for in the Proposed Inpatient Prospective Payment System Rule April 27, 2018

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

Harnessing the Power of MHS Information Systems to Achieve Meaningful Use of Health Information

3 Ways to Increase Patient Visits

MEANINGFUL USE FOCUSES INDUSTRY ON BABY STEPS

Chapter 11. Expanding Roles and Functions of the Health Information Management and Health Informatics Professional

Core Item: Clinical Outcomes/Value

Texas ACO invests in the Quanum portfolio to improve patient care

Go! Guide: Medication Administration

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

Meaningful Use: Introduction to Meaningful Use Eligible Providers

NEW PATIENT PACKET. Address: City: State: Zip: Home Phone: Cell Phone: Primary Contact: Home Phone Cell Phone. Address: Driver s License #:

Tools for Providers. Clinical Care and Practice AdvancementElectronic Health Records (EHR)

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Updates October 2, 2012 Rick Hoover & Andy Finnegan

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

EHR for the PCMH A Doctor s Perspective. Medical Home Summit

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

2014 PCMH Standards: How CPCI Can Help with Transformation. CHCANYS Quality Improvement Program November 20, 2014

Welcome to BCHC Your Medical Home

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

Meaningful Use for 2014 Stag St e ag 1 Or Or Stag St e ag e 2 For Fo r 2014? Meaningful Meaningful Use: Stag St e ag e 1 1 Fo r Fo 2014

ehealth Report for Ed Clark November 10, 2016 My Background and Context:

Practice Transformation: Patient Centered Medical Home Overview

Meaningful Use of EHRs to Improve Patient Care Session Code: A11 & B11

Appendix 6. PCMH 2014 Summary of Changes

OPERATIONS MANUAL CARE CONNECTIONS PROGRAM LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES

Transcription:

Patient Portal Success Patient Portal Success Quality Insights Quality Innovation Network Improving Outcomes by Optimizing Your EHR Initiative Tuesday, January 27, 2015 Quality Improvement Organizations ~,...,...,... c.- Quality Insights

Patient Portals: Best Practices For Achieving Success Christine Bechtel President & CEO January 2015

Overview Background and Context What do patients want from online access? National survey data What best practices have emerged from doctors offices who implemented portals Recommendations & Strategies for increasing portal use and office efficiency

Background Consumers increasingly expect EHRs in their providers office, and they like it. They especially like online access (portals) Meaningful Use has been a big driver: Portal use went from Menu in Stage 1 to Core in Stage 2 ~17,000 professionals completed Stage 2 so far MU2 has two measures - % offer and % use Offer to 50%, use by 5% Including 5% who use secure messaging Big focus on patient engagement in health IT but how do we do it well and meet MU?

Survey of patients representing total U.S. adult population Harris Poll conducted a nationally representative online survey in April-May 2014 Follow up to2011 survey Total respondent pool of 2,045 adults who Had an ongoing relationship with a main doctor Knew what kind of record system electronic or paper the doctor used 1,192 respondents in EHR systems, 853 in paper-record systems Demographically representative of total U.S. population Sample represents 68 percent of the national adult population, or approximately 160 million Americans Oversamples of Latino, Black & Asian communities; survey offered in Spanish 5

Snapshot Patients overwhelmingly believe that EHRs are useful across the range of clinical and patientfacing functions. Helpful to doctors and to patients personally Patients with online access have doubled from 26% in 2011 to 50% in 2014. Even greater numbers of patients with online access are using it 80% in 2011 vs. 86% in 2014

privacy & trust design for diversity esharing care planning Online access Convenience features Use EHRs Different people. Different phases of life. Different digital tools. Many strategies for patient engagement 7 Strategies for Engaging Patients in their Care using Health IT

Online Access Among respondents who who have online access, 86% use it at least once a year: 7-11 times/yr, 10% Once/month +, 16% 3-6 times/yr, 29% Use of Online Access Never, 14% 1-2 times/yr, 31% Never 1-2 times/yr 3-6 times/yr 7-11 times/yr Once/month+ 55% use online access 3 or more times a year!

Most Common Users Those who use the portal most often are predominately those who: Have a chronic condition Are in fair or poor health No other statistically significant differences by age, income, education, race/ethnicity, etc.

Chart 14: Positive Impact of Online Access on Aspects of Base = Accessed EHRs online (n=492) Online Access = Better Outcomes Chart 14: Positive Impact of Online Access on Aspects of Care [Base = Accessed EHRs online (n=492)] Ability to share health info with family 49% Decision to stay with physician Desire to do something to improve my health Quality of care 58% 60% 62% Positive or somewhat positive impact Ability to correct info in medical record 63% Ability to communicate with doctor 78% Knowledge of my health 79% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

More Use = Even Better Outcomes Chart 15: Impact of Frequency of Online Access [Base = Accessed EHRs online: 1-2 times/year (n=187), 3+ times/year (n=305)] 100% 90% 88% 85% 80% 70% 60% 63% 65% 75% 71% 71% 68% 59% 50% 40% 40% 48% 39% 41% 32% 30% 20% 10% 0% Knowledge of my health Ability to communicate with doctor Quality of care Ability to correct errors in medical record Desire to do something to improve health Decision to stay with physician Ability to share health info with family Accessed 3+ times/year Accessed 1-2 times/year

Online Access Far Reaching Effects Those who use online access 3+ times per year have significantly greater trust that their providers will protect their privacy 84% trusting completely or a lot, vs. 69% Online access motivates people: 6 in 10 say it improves their desire to do something about their health Hispanic adults significantly more likely (23 ppts) to say having online access increases their desire to do something about their health. Even among patients with paper records 2/3 (64%) believe online access is important.

Features Patients & Families Want Most Which of the following activities would you do with online access to your health information? [Base = All qualified respondents (n=2045)] Review test results 75% View medical records/history Schedule appointments 64% 66% Submit medication refill requests 59% Review doctors' notes from previous visit Review doctors' treatment recommendations/care plans Email doctor or office staff 56% 56% 58% Access immunization records 49% Download medical records/history 38% Set or track goals for my health 31% Share my health information with family members 23% Do nothing 10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Why Patients Don t Use Online Access Of those who rarely accessed their records online (14%, n=270) 77% of men said they don t need to, along with 63% of women 34% of women said they prefer to speak with the doctor in person, along with 27% of men 13% of women found the process of accessing info to be confusing, along with 2% of men

Secure Messaging Strong majority (56%) of patients want secure email with providers Desired most by adults 65+ (!!!) 60% vs. 48% under age 65 Desired more by adults ages 35-64 (56%) than those under age 35 (48%) But still. Less likely to use secure messaging: Lower income patients (under 35K) 10 ppts less likely African Americans 12 ppts less likely High school education 13-15 ppts less likely

So Now What Do I Do? Portals are not new People used to implement them to make their workf low better and better engage patients and families Not just because of Meaningful Use! What do these pioneers have to say?? And does that hold up today?

Provider Interviews 2011, 2014 National Partnership for Women & Families interviewed eight providers in 2010-2011 Why did you implement a portal? How did your staff feel about it? How did you get them on board? How did you engage patients? What worked best? What would you do differently in hindsight?

Provider Interviews Key Findings Identify problems to solve, collect data to build the case for staff buy in Before: Doctors were spending 3-3.5 hours after patient visits on admin tasks. After: Doctors now spend about 60 minutes on the same tasks. Portals are hugely efficient on the provider side for arranging things that don t need physician involvement such as through the medication desk, referral desk, appointment desk, general desk. Instead of doctors having to deal with a lot of this individually, it s all taken care of for them, and they only have to deal with clinical questions.

Provider Interviews Key Findings Find efficiencies for your practice AND your patients Before: Patient experience scores on lab test results delivery well below national benchmark. After: Partnering with patients to design a process for lab test delivery via the portal decreased call volume and improved patient experience scores to benchmark. [Secure messaging is] a time saver rather than time sink. That s key to understand. Being able to deliver lab results electronically is worlds easier.

Provider Interviews Key Findings Partner with patients to get results After Visit Summaries were highly problematic early in MU1 Before: Parking lots and trash cans cluttered with AVS, high call volume post-visit (18%) After: Practice collaborated with patients and vendor to redesign AVS, reduced call volume. Providing [patients with] more information, getting patients more involved, can result in the ability to spend more time and money on care.

Leverage the Portal as a tool for partnership and patient safety Provider Interviews Key Findings In my mind it really reduces my liability and risk management concerns because I now have a partner another pair of eyes. I have someone on my team for whom this is more important than anything else. Now patients partner with me, and that both helps me and reduces their anxiety.

Best Practices & Recommendations Start with the pain points of your practice (call volume, medication refills, lab results, etc.) Find ways the portal can help you, with the right workf lows Identify the pain points of your practice for patients Patient experience data, focus group, interviews, advisory council, feedback received, etc. Bring patients in as collaborators Verify pain points and ID the ways the portal can help. Assess how portal is/isn t working for them. Map your workflow for promoting and using the portal Work with patients to map their workf low (sign up -> use) Collaborate together to design how the portal will help you both

Bottom Lines Offer features patients want the most Convenience features we know patients will use: Med refills, online scheduling, bill pay, labs Features relevant and helpful to frequent users: fairpoor health status and chronic conditions Enlist patients as partners design, feedback, evaluation Build portal into the practice s workf low and enlist the entire team (front desk, MAs, clinicians) Make sure it works in patients workflow too!

The Future View, Download, Transmit Auto VDT Care planning Open Notes evisits Telemedicine

Resources National survey of consumers and health IT www.nationalpartnership.org/patientsspeak National Partnership Provider Interviews: http://www.nationalpartnership.org/researchlibrary/health-care/hit/using-health-it-to-engage-patientsin-their-care.pdf CMS MU Requirements: http://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/ Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/S tage_2.html

Every encounter with a patient is an opportunity to provide patientcentered care. Every time. By every one. Christine Bechtel CB@BechtelHealth.org www.bechtelhealth.org