Texas Department of Transportation

Similar documents
Sources of Funding for Transit in Urban Areas in Texas Final report PRC

Monthly Review of the Texas Economy May 2012

Monthly Review of the Texas Economy November 2013

Stimulus Funding and Transportation

An ongoing research program at the Real Estate Center. Texas Job Market Outpaces Nation's

Monthly Review of the Texas Economy

AT TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY. By Ali Anari, Research Economist Mark G. Dotzour, Chief Economist TECHNICAL REPORT

Sources of Funding Transit in Texas Final Report PRC

NEPA PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

Transportation Planning Policy Manual

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of Enacted February 17, 2009

Welcome to the WebEx. The presentation for the 2019 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Public Meeting will begin shortly.

APTA RAIL CONFERENCE. WORKSHOP The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

TEXAS. Legend STRAHNET URBAN AREAS LA Gulf of Mexico. Last Updated: June Installations. Interstate STRAHNET Non-Interstate STRAHNET

HIGHER EDUCATION REGIONAL COUNCILS

Falling Forward: A Guide to the FAST Act

9. Positioning Ports for Grant Funding and Government Loan Programs

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

RAMP Session Amy Slaughter RAMP Grant Program Manager TxDOT Aviation Division March 28, 2018

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Transportation and the Federal Government

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration. FTA Update. GAMPO Meeting November 30, 2010

Welcome to the WebEx. The presentation for the 2018 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) Public Meeting will begin shortly.

Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief

Texas Competitiveness: Creating a State Economic Strategy

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

MAP-21: An Analysis. The Trust Fund

TIGER & FASTLANE: AN INSIDE LOOK AT NEW OPPORTUNITY

Higher Education continues to grow at record paces Preliminary fall enrollment figures indicate record growth in 2009 was no fluke

Brownfields Conference Oklahoma City, OK May 22, What is FHWA?

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

TALKIING POINTS FOR THE APTA LEGAL AFFAIRS CONFERENCE

INTRASTATE SWITCHED ACCESS SERVICES TITLE PAGE. Grande Communications Networks, Inc. 401 Carlson Circle San Marcos, Texas 78666

2016 DOT Discretionary Grants

Report of NCLEX-PN Examination Pass Rates for 2011

Higher Education Fund Summary of Recommendations - Senate

2010 Michigan Public Transit Conference

2007 PROFESSIONAL NURSING SHORTAGE REDUCTION PROGRAM

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Legislative Program

NEWS: Senate Committee Approves FY2019 Transportation, HUD Appropriations Bill 1 message

Recovery Act: Ensuring Accountability During Times of Fiscal Stress

Table 1: AGGREGATE DATA, BY FORMULA PROGRAM 1 Information Requested Example Please Insert Your Data in This Column

Paul Paine Chairman, NAS Fort Worth, JRB Regional Coordination Committee Chairman, Texas Military Preparedness Commission.

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

Impact of Program Implementation on the Effectiveness of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

Contract Number Begin End

Why do metro areas matter to economic recovery and prosperity? What is ARRA, and how well does it empower cities and metro areas?

Federal Stimulus Dollars for Louisiana

RURAL BRIEF AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 CENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS. Department of Agriculture

Maintaining Project Consistency throughout the Project Development Process

Status Report on New Nursing Education Programs and Currently Active and Potential Proposals

KEY TAKEAWAYS THE STIMULUS BREAKDOWN

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

Federal Actions to Reduce Energy Use in Transportation

June 3 5, 2014 Corpus Christi, Texas

August 2007 Thomas Bohuslav Texas Department of Transportation

First Generation College Student Initiatives. A Report on the Initial Phase of the First Generation College Student Grants Program.

Lessons Learned from the TIGER Discretionary Grant Program

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY

TRINITY VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Overview of Presentation

Centre County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) Coordinating Committee Meeting Tuesday, March 22, :00 p.m.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Texas Nonagricultural Wage and Salary Employment (Seasonally Adjusted) Total Nonagricultural Employment added 20,000 jobs in December,

South Dakota Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

Division A Federal Aid Highways And Highway Safety Construction Programs

The following table lists the professional nursing educational program s approved since January BSN San Antonio July 07 Fall % 8/8

San Francisco Transportation Task Force 2045

State Management Plan for Public

NSP Laws and Federal Register Notices

Nevada Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

ANNUAL REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL(S) FOR SMALL URBAN AND NON URBANIZED PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS FOR VARIOUS PROGRAMS TABLE OF CONTENTS

First & Main A Blueprint for Prosperity in America s Local Communities


DRAFT American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (HR 1/S 1)

Innovative Project Finance

Project Selection Advisory Council

ANNUAL TRANSIT PROVIDER MEETING FY 2017 GENERAL SESSION, SEPTEMBER 29, 2016

KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission

APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT

Valley Regional Transit Strategic Plan

Washington State Department of Transportation

Federal Transit Administration: Section Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities. Call for Projects.

Federal Support for Streetcars: Frequently Asked Questions

Summary Notes from the Association of Texas MPOs 2017 Full Summer Meeting

TxDOT Internal Audit Local Government Project Oversight Function ( ) Department-wide Report

Florida Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

The American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)

Internal Audit Follow-Up Report

SUNIGA/LEMAY MULTI-MODAL AND FREIGHT CONNECTIVITY PROJECT

Delaware Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

Montana Smart Transportation:

ATTACHMENT B. Opportunities to Implement Measure M Through New and Expanded State and Federal Transportation Funding Programs

2018 Transportation Planning Conference Dallas, Texas

Module 2 Planning and Programming

LSC-Kingwood. Institutions Attended, Fall 2009 Academic Students Community and Technical Colleges. LSC-Kingwood

Transcription:

Texas Department of Transportation DEWITT C. GREER STATE HIGHWAY BLDG 125 E. 11TH STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701-2483' (512) 463-8585 September 28, 2009 Mary Katherine Stout Director of Budget, Planning & Policy Office of the Governor State Insurance Building 1100 San Jacinto Austin, Texas 78701 Dear Ms. Stout: Pursuant to Article XII, Section 5(a) of the General Appropriations Act, Senate Bill 1, Acts of the 81 st Legislature, Regular Session, 2009, and House Bill 4586, Acts of the 81 st Legislature, Regular Session, 2009, enclosed with this letter please find a report providing details on the Texas Department of Transportation's use of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act appropriations. If you have any questions regarding this information, please feel free to contact me at (512) 305-9501, or should your staff have any questions they may contact Robin Ayers, Government and Public Affairs Division, at (512) 463-8345. Sincerely,.bA~ Amadeo Saenz, Jr., Executive Director Enclosure cc: The Honorable Rick Perry, Governor of Texas Texas Transportation Commission John Barton, Assistant Executive Director for Engineering Operations, TxDOT Robin Ayers, Government and Public Affairs Division, TxDOT THF. TEXAS PLAN REDUCE CONGESTION ENHANCE SAFETY EXPAND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY IMPROVE AIR QUALITY INCREASE THE VALUE OF OUR TRANSPORTATION ASSETS An Equal Opportunity Employer

Report on Texas Department of Transportation use of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Appropriations Pursuant to Article XII Section 5(a) of the General Appropriations Act and House Bill 4586 Amadeo Saenz, Jr., P.E. Executive Director Texas Department of Transportation

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Texas Transportation Summary The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) was signed by President Barak Obama on February 17, 2009. The purpose of the legislation was to create and sustain jobs in the wake of the economic situation the country is facing. The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), in addition to many other State of Texas agencies, received a significant amount of funding from ARRA. TxDOT worked diligently in February and March to identify how our funding would be allocated. This report addresses how funding was broken down and where TxDOT is to date on the spending of ARRA dollars. Highways Texas share is $2.25 billion Funding: ARRA contained $27.5 billion in formula grants to states for highways and bridges. The highway and bridge total for Texas is $2,250,015,000. Of that, approximately $1.68 billion is allocated directly to the Texas Transportation Commission (a minimum of $175 million of this amount must be spent in rural areas), and approximately $500 million is directly allocated to the state s Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), while the remaining $67.5 million is allocated for transportation enhancement projects (e.g. hike and bike trails). Use It or Lose It: The first 50 percent of all highway and bridge funding not suballocated within the state, approximately $775 million, had to be obligated within 120 days from the date the states receive their apportionments and the second 50 percent as well as any sub allocated funding must be obligated within 12 months of that date (March 2, 2010). Texas met the 120-day obligation requirement two weeks before the deadline. To date Texas has obligated $1,194,787,023.06 A complete list of approved projects under the highway portion of the ARRA program may be viewed at the following website: http://www.dot.state.tx.us/project_information/stimulus/default.htm Transit Texas share: $371,806,104 Note: TxDOT s portion is for disbursement of funds to the rural providers (approximately $50 million). Funding: For transit, Texas received $371,806,104. The urban recipients will receive $301,055,797, the smaller rural recipients will receive $42,181,107, and another $28,569,200 will be available to cities through a high growth and high density state formula. For the rural recipients that brings the total number closer to $50 million.

Use It or Lose It: The first 50 percent of all transit funding was to be obligated in 180 days and the second 50 percent must be obligated in 12 months. TxDOT met it s 180- day deadline for the rural program and to date has obligated $40,408,020. A complete list of approved projects under the transit portion of the ARRA program may be viewed at the following website: http://www.dot.state.tx.us/project_information/stimulus/default.htm General Aviation Texas Share: $11,074,051 to date Funding: For aviation, the Federal Aviation Administration received $1.1 billion nationwide in discretionary funds. Texas and other states were required to apply for these funds on a project specific basis. Based on allocations to date Texas has received funding for 6 projects. The total amount awarded for those projects is a little over $11 million. A complete list of approved projects under the general aviation portion of the ARRA program may be viewed at the following website: http://www.dot.state.tx.us/project_information/stimulus/default.htm Rail Texas share is undetermined at this time. Funding: Amtrak: $1.3 billion to improve the speed and capacity of intercity passenger rail service. High Speed Rail and Intercity Passenger Rail Grants: $8 billion to advance the development of high speed rail and to improve the intercity passenger rail service in corridors across the nation. Use it or Lose It High Speed Rail: Within 60 days of enactment the Secretary of Transportation was required to submit a strategic plan to Congress that described how funds will be used to improve and deploy high speed passenger rail systems. The Department of Transportation has issued it s final rule for application of these funds and Texas submitted 9 projects for a total of $1.8 billion. Funding decisions are expected this fall. A complete list of projects submitted for consideration of ARRA rail grant funding may be viewed at the following website: http://www.dot.state.tx.us/txdot_library/publications/hsipr_application.htm Ferry Boats Texas received $7.2 million Funding: Texas received $7,200,000 of discretionary funding for the construction of a new 28 car ferry vessel for TxDOT s Port Aransas Ferry System in Nueces County.

Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) Grants Estimated Texas share: Undetermined, TxDOT must apply for grants. No state may receive more than $300 million. Texas submitted approximately 100 projects for consideration. Funding: Title XII of the Recovery Act appropriates $1.5 billion nationwide, available through September 30, 2011, for Supplementary Discretionary Grants for a National Surface Transportation System. The Recovery Act required the Secretary of Transportation to publish criteria on which to base the competition for TIGER Grants not later than May 18, 2009. Selection Criteria TIGER Discretionary Grants will be awarded based on the following selection criteria, which incorporate the criteria specified in the Recovery Act: Long-Term Outcomes: The USDOT will give priority to projects that have a significant impact on desirable long-term outcomes for the nation, a metropolitan area, or a region. The following types of long-term outcomes will be given priority: State of Good Repair: Improving the condition of existing transportation facilities and systems, with particular emphasis on projects that minimize life-cycle costs. Economic Competitiveness: Contributing to the economic competitiveness of the United States over the medium- to long-term. Livability: Improving the quality of living and working environments and the experience for people in communities across the United States. Sustainability: Improving energy efficiency, reducing dependence on oil, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and benefitting the environment. Safety: Improving the safety of U.S. transportation facilities and systems. Job Creation and Economic Stimulus: Consistent with the purposes of the Recovery Act, the USDOT will give priority to projects that are expected to quickly create and preserve jobs and stimulate rapid increases in economic activity, particularly jobs and activity that benefit economically distressed areas. Innovation: The USDOT will give priority to projects that use innovative strategies to pursue the long-term outcomes outlined above. Partnership: The USDOT will give priority to projects that demonstrate strong collaboration among a broad range of participants and/or integration of transportation with other public service efforts. TIGER Grants shall not be less than $20 million and not greater than $300 million; and the Secretary may waive the $20 million minimum grant size for the purpose of funding significant projects in smaller cities, regions, or States. Not more than 20 percent of the funds available for TIGER Grants may be awarded to projects in a single State. The Federal share of these grants may be up to 100 percent.

A complete list of projects submitted for consideration of TIGER Grant funding may be viewed at the following website: http://www.dot.state.tx.us/project_information/stimulus/tiger/default.htm General Notes Maintenance of Effort Certification: The legislation requires that no recipient spend less than it all ready had planned to spend on transportation on the date of enactment. Governor Perry sent a certification to the Secretary of Transportation on May 22, 2009 stating that Texas will maintain its effort with regard to state funding for the types of transportation projects that are funded by the stimulus legislation. This includes a statement identifying the amount of funds Texas planned to expend from state sources during the period beginning on the date of enactment through September 30, 2010, for the types of projects that are funded in the legislation. Flexibility: Highway funding can be mixed among modes, meaning that it can be spent on transportation modes other than roads (e.g. freight and passenger rail, ports, transit, etc.) No matching requirements. All funds can be considered 100 percent federal. No matching requirements are in effect. However, previously committed local participation and funding from other sources for projects being considered for funding from this program would allow for the leveraging of these resources to maximize the value of these projects for creating jobs and improving the economy. TxDOT, through discussions with the MPOs has determined that it is important to maintain these local commitments and retain them for funding any project selected to receive funding from the ARRA.

A complete report of the obligations and expenditures made as of August 31,2009 may be viewed at: http://www.dot.state.tx.us/txdot_library/publications/fhwa_1585.htm Funding Sub-allocations to the eight largest MPOs (also known as TMAs) CAMPO $29,196,497 Corpus Christi $9,514,791 El Paso $20,991,780 HGAC $123,740,323 Hidalgo County $16,934,952 Lubbock $6,546,325 NCTCOG $143,906,889 San Antonio Bexar $42,974,905 Total for Large MPOs $393,806,462 Funding Sub-allocations to the seventeen small and mid-sized MPOs Abilene $5,042,456 Amarillo $8,446,978 Brownsville $7,809,328 Bryan College Station $6,241,771 Harlingen San Benito $5,218,121 JORTS $11,963,474 KTUTS $11,301,752 Laredo $8,271,454 Longview $3,677,699 MOTOR $9,921,637 San Angelo $4,144,018 Sherman Denison $2,645,946 Texarkana $2,297,302 Tyler $4,781,150 Victoria $2,898,490 Waco $7,216,807 Wichita Falls $4,682,318 Total for Small & Midsized MPOs $106,560,701

Funding Sub-allocations to the TxDOT Districts for Rural Areas Abilene $3,855,172 Amarillo $5,489,266 Atlanta $5,311,124 Austin $12,483,018 Beaumont $7,315,941 Brownwood $3,358,922 Bryan $5,689,265 Childress $734,117 Corpus Christi $7,366,170 Dallas $10,729,506 El Paso $1,612,586 Fort Worth $13,347,634 Houston $25,188,856 Laredo $5,005,087 Lubbock $5,950,279 Lufkin $6,999,552 Odessa $3,209,480 Paris $6,561,999 Pharr $6,024,816 San Angelo $867,879 San Antonio $12,914,739 Tyler $8,782,393 Waco $5,212,261 Wichita Falls $4,147,470 Yoakum $6,479,850 Total District Allocations $174,637,381

TxDOT Summary of American Reinvestment Recovery Act Status Report for September 2009 A complete report of the obligations and expenditures made as of August 31,2009 maybe viewed at: http://www.dot.state.tx.us/txdot_library/publications/fhwa_1585.htm Highways and Bridges Program: AMOUNT OF FUNDING RECEIVED (obligated): $1,194,787,023.06 AMOUNT OF CONTRACTS AWARDED: (April-August) = $1,007,442,735 AMOUNT OF FUNDING SPENT (expended): $109,025,685.52 NUMBER OF CONTRACTS EXECUTED: 176 NUMBER OF PROJECTS COMPLETED: 31 JOBS CREATED: The actual number of on-site jobs reported that have been created or retained as of August 31, 2009 is 5767. Transit Program: AMOUNT OF FUNDING RECEIVED (obligated): $40,408,020 AMOUNT OF GRANTS AWARDED: $40,408,020 AMOUNT OF FUNDING SPENT (expended): $1,588,731.49 NUMBER OF GRANTS EXECUTED: 50 NUMBER OF GRANTS COMPLETED: 0 JOBS CREATED: 608 hours of total job hours created or retained as of July 31. Aviation Program: AMOUNT OF FUNDING RECEIVED (obligated): $11,074,051 AMOUNT OF PROJECTS AWARDED: $11,074,051 AMOUNT OF FUNDING SPENT (expended): $576,405.26 NUMBER OF PROJECTS EXECUTED: 6 NUMBER OF PROJECTS COMPLETED: 0 JOBS CREATED: The actual number of jobs reported that have been created or retained as of August 26, 2009 is 37.