GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS: SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING

Similar documents
FINAL DOCUMENT. Global Harmonization Task Force

IDENTIFYING, RECORDING AND REPORTING ADVERSE EVENTS FOR CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF MEDICAL DEVICES

Guide to Incident Reporting for In-vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Guide to Incident Reporting for General Medical Devices and Active Implantable Medical Devices

GUIDELINES ON A MEDICAL DEVICES VIGILANCE SYSTEM

Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Adverse Event Reporting

University of South Carolina. Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events Guidelines

GHTF SG2 Guidance: Group work output presentation

Safety Reporting in Clinical Research Policy Final Version 4.0

Keele Clinical Trials Unit

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Details: Approval: Distribution & Storage: Pharmacovigilance for Researchers for UoL / LTHT Sponsored CTIMPs. Standard Operating Procedure

Version Number: 003. On: September 2017 Review Date: September 2020 Distribution: Essential Reading for: Information for: Page 1 of 13

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety

PROMPTLY REPORTABLE EVENTS

Sponsor Responsibilities. Roles and Responsibilities. EU Directives. UK Law

I. Scope This policy defines unanticipated problems and adverse events and establishes the reporting process and timeline.

FINAL STATUS DOCUMENT

New European Union Clinical Trial Regulations

Marie-Claire Rickard, RG and GCP Manager Jimena Lovos, Quality Assurance Manager Elizabeth Clough, R&D Governance Operations Manager

POLICY ON RESEARCH RELATED ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING

Post Market Surveillance Requirements. SAMED Regulatory Conference 2 December 2015

Standard Operating Procedure

M. Rickard, Research Governance and GCP Manager R. Fay Research Governance and GCP Manager Elizabeth Clough, Governance Operations Manager

Biomedical IRB MS #

Adverse Event Reporting

Research Adverse Event and Safety Reporting Procedures Outcome Statement: Title:

Post Market Surveillance (PMS): National Competent Authority Report (NCAR) Exchange Programme under IMDRF

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 205

Medical devices briefing for patients: Patient safety in the new Regulation

SOP Title: Reporting Adverse Events and New Safety Information

TITLE: Reporting Adverse Events SOP #: RCO-204 Page: 1 of 5 Effective Date: 01/31/18

Determining and Reporting Adverse Events vs. Product Complaints

Medical Device Reporting. FD&C Act CFR Direct Final Rule 2/28/05. As amended by:

Guideline for the notification of serious breaches of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 or the clinical trial protocol

Overview of Draft Pharmacovigilance Protocol

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. Safety of the food chain Chemicals, contaminants, pesticides

Human Research Governance Review Policy

Brussels, 12 June 2014 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 10855/14. Interinstitutional File: 2012/0266 (COD) 2012/0267 (COD)

FERCI MODEL SOPs. [The IEC members (author/s, reviewer/s) and Chairperson will sign and date the SOP on this first page]

MEDICINES CONTROL COUNCIL

Contains Nonbinding Recommendations. Draft Not for Implementation

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

Official Journal of the European Union

ACRIN ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING MANUAL. 1 March 2006 v.3

THE BOARD OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC COMMISSION RESOLUTION. dated December 22, 2015 N 174

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD REPORTING UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS INCLUDING ADVERSE EVENTS

Regulatory and ethics bodies involved in approval process

Complaint Handling and Medical Device Reporting (MDRs)

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

MEDICINES CONTROL COUNCIL

HAEMOVIGILANCE POLICY

Drugs and Cosmetics (First Amendment) Rules, 2013

Regulatory and ethics bodies involved in approval process. Competent Authority/-ies (CA)/ For certain types of MDs Ethics committee(s)

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON DIRECTIVE 2005/50/EC ON THE RECLASSIFICATION

MEDICINES CONTROL COUNCIL

WORKING CONSOLIDATED TEXT

Drugs and Cosmetics rules, 2013 India

Reference Number: UHB 253 Version Number: 1 Date of Next Review: 22/01/2018 Previous Trust/LHB Reference Number: SR-RG-015

European Commission s proposal for a Regulation on Medical Devices (2012/0266 (COD)) EPF Position Statement

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Reporting Serious Breaches in Clinical Research

Intertek Health, Environmental & Regulatory Services

ICH Topic E 2 D Post Approval Safety Data Management. Step 5 NOTE FOR GUIDANCE ON DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS FOR EXPEDITED REPORTING (CPMP/ICH/3945/03)

Standard Operating Procedure. Essential Documents: Setting Up a Trial Master File. SOP effective: 19 February 2016 Review date: 19 February 2018

CMDv/BPG/002. BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Veterinary Decentralised Procedure (DCP)

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

European IVD Regulations and Risk Based Classification. An Overview for Global Quality Professionals

Regulatory Control of Diagnostics in Tanzania. Hiiti Sillo Ag. Director General Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority

Human Research Ethics Review Policy

This document describes the purpose and functions of University Health and Safety Committees.

RITAZAREM CRF Completion Guidelines

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

Adopted by Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee 20 February Adopted by Pharmacovigilance Inspectors Working Group 21 March 2014

ICTpsp I C T P O L I C Y S U P P O R T P R O G R A M M E. CIP ICT PSP Pilots A, Pilots B, Thematic Networks, Best Practice Networks, PPI Pilots

managing or activities.

RECOMMENDATIONS ON CLOUD OUTSOURCING EBA/REC/2017/03 28/03/2018. Recommendations. on outsourcing to cloud service providers

Research Governance Framework 2 nd Edition, Medicine for Human Use (Clinical Trial) Regulations 2004

Document Title: Investigator Site File. Document Number: 019

Study Monitoring Plan Template

Section 11. Adverse Event Reporting and Safety Monitoring

Preventing Medical Errors

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Changing Requirements for Devices//Device Constituent Parts in Combination Products

National Health Regulatory Authority Kingdom of Bahrain

MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR REACH AND CLP INSPECTIONS 1

Prepublication Requirements

Version Number: 004 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled Document Lead:

Audits/Inspections Be Prepared for Anything

GCP INSPECTION CHECKLIST

PART 573 DEFECT AND NONCOMPLIANCE REPORTS. Nat l Highway Traffic Safety Admin., DOT 573.3

Roles & Responsibilities of Investigator & IRB

3 HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Recommendations on outsourcing to cloud service providers (EBA/REC/2017/03)

FDA Medical Device Regulations vs. ISO 14155

NHS GREATER GLASGOW AND CLYDE POLICIES RELATING TO THE MANAGEMENT OF MEDICINES SECTION 9.1: UNLICENSED MEDICINES POLICY (ACUTE DIVISION)

COMMISSION DELEGATED DIRECTIVE../ /EU. of

Human Samples in Research

COATS Coordinating Center Memo #3

Transcription:

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL for HEALTH and CONSUMERS Consumer Affairs Cosmetics and Medical Devices MEDDEV 2.7/3 December 2010 GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS: SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING UNDER DIRECTIVES 90/385/EEC AND 93/42/EEC. The present guidelines are part of a set of guidelines relating to questions of application of EU-Directives on MEDICAL DEVICEs. They are legally not binding. The guidelines have been carefully drafted through a process of intensive consultation of the various interested parties (competent authorities, Commission services, industries, other interested parties) during which intermediate drafts were circulated and comments were taken up in the document. Therefore, this document reflects positions taken by representatives of interested parties in the medical devices sector. These guidelines incorporate changes introduced by Directive 2007/47/EC amending Council Directive 90/385/EEC and Council Directive 93/42/EEC.

1. OBJECTIVE This guidance defines Serious Adverse Event (SAE) reporting modalities and includes a summary tabulation reporting format 1. Its objective is to contribute to the notification of SAEs to all concerned National Competent Authorities (NCAs 2 ) in the context of clinical investigations in line with the requirements of Annex 7 of Directive 90/385/EEC and Annex X of Directive 93/42/EEC, as amended by Directive 2007/47/EC. According to annex 7 of Directive 90/385/EEC and to annex X of Directive 93/42/EEC: All serious adverse events must be fully recorded and immediately notified to all competent authorities of the Member States in which the clinical investigation is being performed." 2. SCOPE The reporting modalities and format set out in this guidance apply to pre-market 3 clinical investigations 4-5 conducted with: a. Non-CE marked devices, b. CE marked devices used outside the intended use(s) covered by the CE marking. The tabular format featured in the Appendix needs to be updated for each reportable event or for new findings/updates to already reported events. It shall be transmitted to all NCAs where the clinical investigation is being performed. 3. DEFINITIONS (from ISO/FDIS 14155) Adverse Device Effect (ADE) Adverse event related to the use of an investigational medical device. NOTE 1- This includes any adverse event resulting from insufficiencies or inadequacies in the instructions for use, the deployment, the implantation, the installation, the operation, or any malfunction of the investigational medical device. NOTE 2- This includes any event that is a result of a use error or intentional misuse. Adverse Event (AE) 1 A template for individual reporting of SAEs is under preparation to harmonize individual SAE forms in case NCAs require individual reporting for the SAEs occurring within their jurisdictions. Further revisions of these template documents may become necessary in line with the forthcoming corresponding GHTF-Guidance. 2 For the purpose of this guidance," NCAs" encompass the National Competent Authorities of the EU, the EEA and of Switzerland and Turkey. 3 A specific guidance on Post Market Clinical Follow-Up Studies is in preparation. 4 - This includes pre-market clinical investigations: which started prior to 21 March 2010 and are continued after that date. [Note: reporting of SAE as covered in this guidance only started on 21 March 2010 with the implementation of Directive 2007/47/EC and is not retrospective.to SAEs that occurred prior to 21 March 2010]. - For pre-market clinical investigations involving CE marked comparator devices, SAEs occurring in or to subjects that are in the comparator arm of an investigation shall also be reported in accordance with these guidelines. 5 Where the right to bear the CE marking has been obtained before the end of the clinical investigation, the SAE reporting continues until completion of the investigation, according to the clinical investigation plan. Page 2 of 6

Any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury or any untoward clinical signs (including an abnormal laboratory finding) in subjects, users or other persons whether or not related to the investigational medical device. NOTE 1: This includes events related to the investigational device or the comparator. NOTE 2: This includes events related to the procedures involved (any procedure in the clinical investigation plan). NOTE 3: For users or other persons this is restricted to events related to the investigational medical device. Device deficiency Inadequacy of a medical device related to its identity, quality, durability, reliability, safety or performance, such as malfunction, misuse or use error and inadequate labeling. Investigational medical device Medical device being assessed for safety or performance in a clinical investigation NOTE: This includes medical devices already on the market that are being evaluated for new intended uses, new populations, new materials or design changes. Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) Adverse device effect that has resulted in any of the consequences characteristic of a serious adverse event. Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Adverse event that: a) led to a death, b) led to a serious deterioration in health that either: 1) resulted in a life-threatening illness or injury, or 2) resulted in a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or 3) required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or 4) resulted in medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. c) led to fetal distress, fetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect. NOTE 1: This includes device deficiencies that might have led to a serious adverse event if a) suitable action had not been taken or b) intervention had not been made or c) if circumstances had been less fortunate. These are handled under the SAE reporting system. NOTE 2: A planned hospitalization for pre-existing condition, or a procedure required by the Clinical Investigation Plan, without a serious deterioration in health, is not considered to be a serious adverse event. Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect (USADE) Serious adverse device effect which by its nature, incidence, severity or outcome has not been identified in the current version of the risk analysis report. NOTE: Anticipated: an effect which by its nature, incidence, severity or outcome has been previously identified in the risk analysis report Page 3 of 6

4. REPORTABLE EVENTS UNDER ANNEX 7 AND ANNEX X OF DIRECTIVES 90/385/EEC AND 93/42/EEC RESPECTIVELY. For the purpose of this guidance and based on the definitions above, the following events are considered reportable events in accordance with Annex 7, section 2.3.5 and Annex X, section 2.3.5 of the above mentioned Directives: - any SAE, - any Investigational Medical Device Deficiency that might have led to a SAE if a) suitable action had not been taken or b) intervention had not been made or c) if circumstances had been less fortunate - new findings/updates in relation to already reported events. Reportable events occurring in Third Countries 6 in which a clinical investigation is performed under the same clinical investigation plan, have to be reported in accordance with this guidance. 5. REPORT BY WHOM. Reportable events have to be reported by the sponsor of the clinical investigation, which could be the manufacturer (MFR), the authorized representative (AR) or another person or entity 7-8. 6. REPORT TO WHOM. Reportable events must be reported at the same time to all NCAs where the clinical investigation has commenced 9-10 using the summary tabulation featured in the Appendix. A list of clinical investigation contact points within the NCAs is published at the Commission's homepage. 7. REPORTING TIMELINES 7.1 Report by sponsor to NCAs. The sponsor must report to the NCAs where the clinical investigation has commenced: a SAE which indicates an imminent risk of death, serious injury, or serious illness and that requires prompt remedial action for other patients/subjects, users or other persons 11 or a new finding to it: immediately, but not later than 2 calendar days after 6 Countries other than Switzerland, Turkey and those belonging to the EU and the EEA. 7 Note: Member States may also require separate reporting by clinical investigators/medical professionals. 8 Note: SAEs concerning CE marked devices (e.g. comparators) which meet the vigilance reporting criteria may also need to be handled under the post-market surveillance/vigilance system. 9 For the purpose of this guidance, an investigation is considered to have commenced in an individual Member State when the sponsor is authorised to start the investigation in accordance with the notification procedures in that Member State. 10 Note: Member States may also require separate reporting to the Ethics Committee(s) and/or separate reporting to the other clinical investigators/study centers involved in the clinical investigation. 11 This includes: - events that are of significant and unexpected nature such that they become alarming as a potential public health hazard, e.g. human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or Creutzfeldt-Jacob Disease (CJD). These concerns may be identified by either the NCA or the MFR. - the possibility of multiple deaths occurring at short intervals. Page 4 of 6

awareness by sponsor of a new reportable event or of new information in relation with an already reported event. any other reportable events as described in section 4 or a new finding/update to it: immediately, but not later than 7 calendar days following the date of awareness by the sponsor of the new reportable event or of new information in relation with an already reported event. 7.2 Report by the investigator to the sponsor The sponsor shall implement and maintain a system to ensure that the reporting of the reportable events will be provided by the investigator to the sponsor in acceptable timely conditions, but not later than within 3 calendar days after the occurrence of the event. In some cases, a different periodicity or different modalities 12 may be agreed by the participating NCAs according to the investigational design and to the pathology under clinical investigation. This would allow adequate provision for clinical investigations (e.g. palliative oncology ) in which SAE frequency is expected to be high due to progression of the disease. This needs to be agreed between the sponsor and relevant NCAs. 8. REPORTING FORM The reporting form template for the summary SAE tabulation is given in the Appendix of this document. The table gives a cumulative overview of the reportable events per clinical investigation and will be updated and transmitted to participating NCAs each time a new reportable event or a new finding to an already reported event is to be reported. More detailed information has to be provided on request of an NCA. The sponsor shall identify the new/updated information in the status column of the tabular form featured in the Appendix as: a = added = new reportable event; m = modified = new finding/update to an already reported event; u = unchanged. Changes in a line should be highlighted in bold and/or color in the respective column. The reporting form is study specific and covers only a given clinical investigation, defined by a distinct clinical investigation plan. English is the recommended language for the reporting form. The report should be sent by email preferably in Excel or equivalent format to the participating NCAs. REFERENCES: 1. Council Directive 90/385/EEC of 20 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices, last amended by Directive 2007/47/EC. 2. Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices, last amended by Directive 2007/47/EC. 3. ISO/FDIS 14155:2010 Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects Good clinical practice 12 in line with Annex 7.2.3.5 of Directive 90/385/EEC and Annex X.2.3.5 of Directive 93/42/EEC Page 5 of 6

APPENDIX REPORTING FORM EUDAMED - ID: MEDDEV 2.7/3 SAE Report Table- V1 Title of Clinical Investigation: CIP Number: Contact person (Name, Address, E-Mail, Telephone Number) Device type: MS+NCA Reference Numbers for all participating Countries: Reference Member State: No. of Patients enrolled to date (date of report): No. of Invest. Devices used to date Date of Report: Status: a, m, u Date Sponsor received Report of SAE Country Study Center Patient ID Code Date of Procedure/ First Use Date of Event Onset Event: Organ System Description of event action/ treatment/patient outcome Assessment of Relationship to Procedure: Yes No Possibly Assessment of Relationship to Investigational Device: Yes No Possibly Unanticipated SADE yes/no Treatment Arm: Investigational Device/ Control Group/ blinded/ n.a. Event Status: Resolved/ Resolved with Sequelae/ Ongoing/Death Date of Event Resolution Note: Submission of this report does not, in itself, represent a conclusion by the sponsor or the competent authority that the content of this report is complete or that the device(s) listed failed in any manner and/or that the device(s) caused or contributed to the alleged death or deterioration in the state of the health of any person. Page 6