Project Initiation Document

Similar documents
Project Initiation Document

Project Initiation Document

Project Initiation Document. Pilot name: 1777 Municipality: City of Kortrijk Work-package: WP3 Date: July 2010 (v2)

e-government the state of play

Innovative Models in egovernance Best Practice Digital Austria

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

INTRODUCTION SOLUTION IMPLEMENTATION BENEFITS SUCCESS FACTORS LESSONS LEARNED. Implemented the ehealthscope Tool to provide information to GPs

Internal Audit. Health and Safety Governance. November Report Assessment

Presentation of the Workshop Training the Experts Workshop Brussels, 4 April 2014

Competitiveness and Innovation CIP

URBACT III Programme Manual

Supporting Young Adults with Kidney Disease. Author: Date: Version:

Corporate plan Moving towards better regulation. Page 1

United Nations Development Programme. Country: Armenia PROJECT DOCUMENT

Open Research Data (ORD) in a European Policy Context and Horizon 2020

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

The business is on a growth trajectory and central to this growth is the need to attract successful recruitment consultants.

Local Energy Challenge Fund

INTRODUCTION SOLUTION IMPLEMENTATION BENEFITS SUCCESS FACTORS LESSONS LEARNED

EU egovernment Action Plan

OpenPEPPOL Guidance on the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF)

Annex to the. Steps for the implementation

GUIDANCE PACK FOR COMPLETING APPLICATION FORM PLEASE READ THIS DOCUMENT CAREFULLY BEFORE COMPLETING THE ONLINE APPLICATION

Application Form: FOR INFORMATION ONLY, DO NOT SUBMIT ON THIS FORM. FINAL APPLICATIONS WILL BE MADE ONLINE.

Numerator. Denominator Rationale for inclusion

- Proposal for a Regulation on HTA- Ioana Siska, MD, PhD DG SANTE - Health Systems and Products Medical Products: safety, quality, innovation

European Commission Information Society and Media Directorate General. November 2005

PEPPOL Pan European Public Procurement Online

This report is for general dissemination

Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs Users Guide

Invitation to tender for:

PARTNERS AND PROJECTS Charity registration No SC in Scotland

Towards faster implementation and uptake of open government

INTRODUCTION SOLUTION IMPLEMENTATION BENEFITS SUCCESS FACTORS LESSONS LEARNED. First phase of NEHR launched, with 15 care organisations

NHS North West London

Council of the European Union Brussels, 20 April 2016 (OR. en) Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

Courts Service ICT Strategy Statement

TENDER BRIEF: Liverpool City Region Marine & Maritime Knowledge Hub (LMKH)

JOB VACANCY AT EIT FOOD

Product/Market Fit Program Guide

CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE CREATION OF UP TO 25 TRANSFER NETWORKS

Implementing open government at local level. Andrea Halmos European Commission DG CONNECT H4, egovernment & Trust Unit

Equality & Rights Action Plan

DRAFT Welsh Assembly Government

ehealth and esocial in Finland - today and 2020 Anne Kallio MSAH Finland

2008/SOM3/SCCP/002attB Agenda Item: 3(i)

December Federal ICT Strategy

Reservation of Powers to the Board & Delegation of Powers

Services to Local Government

THE SIX CITY STRATEGY

Request for Quotation. Brand Development

2014 to 2020 European Structural and Investment Funds Growth Programme. Call for Proposals European Social Fund. Priority Axis 2 : Skills for Growth

CHARITIES ONLINE: GIFT AID - BRIEFING FOR MEMBERS 30 th November 2012

Linking research and standardization. Integrating standards in your research project: a pocket guide for project proposers

Erasmus+ Frequently Asked Questions

= eé~äíü=aéé~êíãéåí= = cáå~ååé=aáêéåíçê~íé=

Priority Axis 1: Promoting Research and Innovation

Scottish Ambulance Service

Access to Psychological Therapies DCAQ in NHS Ayrshire & Arran

Report to Governing Body 19 September 2018

AFRICAN ELEPHANT SUMMIT GABORONE, BOTSWANA 2 DECEMBER 2013

Developing an EU Standardised Approach to Vocational Qualifications in Healthcare Waste Management

Update on NHS Central London CCG QIPP schemes

Closing Date: 5:00pm Friday 28 July, 2017

Case Study - SPT Community Transport

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. Report on the interim evaluation of the «Daphne III Programme »

Ashton, Leigh and Wigan Primary Care Trust & Wigan Council. Review of Intermediate Care. Phase 1: Diagnostic

IO1 A2. Needs Validation Report. 1. Financial Check Training Course FCT Course Activity 2 Deliverable 2 Delivery Date March 2018

JOB VACANCY AT EIT FOOD / CLC North-West

Report. To the Chair and Members of CABINET

MC-eGov Study on Multi-channel Delivery Strategies and Sustainable Business Models for Public Services addressing Socially Disadvantaged Groups

Horizon 2020 Proposal Development Training Course

MASONIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION JOB DESCRIPTION

External Evaluation Tender Brief

Erasmus+ Application Form. Call: A. General Information. B. Context. B.1. Project Identification

Integrated Care Co-Ordination Model. Healthier Together. Project Initiation Document

The Dialogue Facility THE DIALOGUE FACILITY Bridging Phase Guidelines and Criteria for Support

The role is initially for a period of 12 months commencing in January 17, however there is a possibility of an extension subject to funding.

KNOWLEDGE ALLIANCES WHAT ARE THE AIMS AND PRIORITIES OF A KNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE? WHAT IS A KNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE?

Erasmus+ General Information. Context. Application Form Call: KA2 Cooperation and Innovation for Good Practices

Background and progress

Coast to Capital ERDF Sector Specific Business Support Call Launch Event

NGO Programme - Greece EEA Financial Mechanism APPLICATION FORM FOR THE OUTCOME DEMOCRATIC VALUES, INCLUDING HUMAN RIGHTS, PROMOTED

European Social Economy Regions

GOOD PRACTICE CALL DECEMBER 2016

Economic Impact of the University of Edinburgh s Commercialisation Activity

Developing. National Service Frameworks

Developing a New Strategy for the Visitor Economy

Organisation Implementation Cooperation - Coordination

European Social Fund

Business Development, Innovation and SMEs Practical Information and Guidance to Applicants

List all the SESAR members involved in the task, either as main contributor or as partner contributor: Company A; Company B; etc.

Belmont Forum Collaborative Research Action:

Introduction. 1 About you. Contribution ID: 65cfe814-a0fc-43c ec1e349b48ad Date: 30/08/ :59:32

Consultation: Transformation Health and Care in the Digital Single

INTEGRATION SCHEME (BODY CORPORATE) BETWEEN WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL AND GREATER GLASGOW HEALTH BOARD

Clinical Risk Management: Agile Development Implementation Guidance

Proposal template European Strategic Cluster Partnerships for smart specialisation investments

GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS INTERREG VA

Bahrain s e-government Journey

Transcription:

Project Initiation Document Pilot name: Web Services Project Municipality: The City of Edinburgh Council Work-package: 3 and 5 Date: 15 December 2009 Edinburgh Napier University October 2009

Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Pilot information... 3 2.1. Pilot name... 3 2.2. Pilot acronym... 3 2.3. Pilot website... 3 2.4. What type of initiative is the pilot?... 3 2.5. Pilot country... 4 2.6. Pilot city/region... 4 2.7. Pilot start date... 4 2.8. Pilot finish date... 4 2.9. Pilot operational date... 4 3. Background to the pilot... 5 3.1. Pilot topics... 5 3.2. Pilot sector... 6 3.3. Target users of pilot... 6 3.4. Description of target users... 7 3.5. Type of service... 7 3.6. Overall implementation approach... 7 4. Pilot description... 8 4.1. Objectives... 8 4.2. Approach... 8 4.3. Deliverables... 9 4.4. Exclusions... 9 4.5. Constraints... 10 4.6. Assumptions/dependencies... 10 5. Business case... 11 5.1. Summary/overview... 11 5.2. Customer benefits... 11 5.3. Performance benefits... 11 5.4. Employee benefits... 11 5.5. Financial benefits... 11 5.6. Project benefits... 11 6. Pilot management/organisation... 12 7. Staff/financial resources... 13 8. Reporting framework... 14 9. Pilot plan... 16 10. Risks... 17 11. Co-design... 18 12. Transnational work... 19

1. Introduction A project initiation document [PID] is a document that brings together in one place the key information needed to start, manage and evaluate a pilot. All stakeholders should be informed of the development of a PID, and the final PID should be agreed and signed off by the management in municipal partners. The PID should contain information setting out the "who, what, why, when and how" for the local pilot. It should define all major aspects of the pilot, and can be used as a key part in the management of the delivery of the pilot and sets the baselines that will be used in any assessment of the pilot's success. All Smart Cities partners are expected to produce a PID for each local pilot. These will be used by the project and by local partners to measure progress against the aims and objectives set out in each pilot's PID. Many partners will already be expected to develop PIDs for their pilots: in this case relevant information should be copied into this form. 2. Pilot information This section sets out the basic information about your pilot. 2.1. Pilot name What s your pilot project called? Web Services Project 2.2. Pilot acronym Does the pilot have an acronym? [e.g. SCRAN?] If not, leave blank. 2.3. Pilot website Does the pilot have a local website? If not, leave blank. 2.4. What type of initiative is the pilot? Select all that apply to your pilot. Project or service Network Strategic initiative Award scheme Promotion/awareness scheme Other

2.5. Pilot country Belgium Germany Netherlands Norway Sweden UK 2.6. Pilot city/region Edinburgh 2.7. Pilot start date 28 September 2009 2.8. Pilot finish date 31 March 2011 2.9. Pilot operational date When did your pilot go live to the public/businesses? Not yet

3. Background to the pilot Set out the context for the pilot: why are you interested in doing this work, what issues do you need to address, why do you feel you need to address them etc.. The Web Services Project is one of 10 workstreams of the Customer Services Strategy Work Programme which forms part the Council s Achieving Excellence (AE) programme. Further information on this can be found in the overall Customer Services PID. On 11 November 2008 the Finance and Resources Committee considered a report on options for the Council s web presence. The Committee noted that there were constraints and issues for the web which could not be addressed without replacement of underlying technical platforms and agreed that that a procurement process should be commenced to identify a potential solution. A report on the Web Services Project was approved by the Council Web Board on 5 August and by the Smart City Steering Group on 12 August 2009. The report presented the business case and high level implementation plan for the project and recommended the appointment of Jadu Ltd as the chosen supplier of web content management services as a result of the procurement process. A parallel report on Web Governance was also presented to the Web Board and Steering Group for information. Both reports acknowledged the importance of effective management and governance of content, Council culture in relation to the Web and the customer experience. 3.1. Pilot topics Select all that apply to your pilot Efficiency & Effectiveness, Benchmarking Inclusive egovernment eidentity and esecurity eparticipation, edemocracy and evoting eprocurement Services for Businesses Services for Citizens High Impact Services with Pan-European Scope Interoperability Legal Aspects Multi-channel Delivery Open Source Policy Regional and Local User-centric Services Other Infrastructure

3.2. Pilot sector Select all that apply to your pilot Communication (infrastructure) Crime, Justice and Law Culture and Media Customs Education, Science and Research Electricity/Gas Employment Environment Fire Services Healthcare Internal market Local/Regional Community Development Procurement Social Security Social Services Tax Travel, Transports and Motoring Water Other Social Services Other 3.3. Target users of pilot Select all that apply to your pilot egoverment Administrative Business (self-employed) Business (industry) Disadvantaged/deprived communities Families and children at risk Homeless Minorities and migrants Business (SME) Older people (60+) Citizen Civil society Intermediaries Other ehealth Add Patients General public Health authorities People living in poverty and/or precarity People with anti-social and criminal behavior People with disability People with health and long-term care problems People with no or poor digital literacy SMEs, associations and intermediaries Unemployed people Young people at risk of marginalisation

Health professionals Other einclusion Women Any citizen 3.4. Description of target users Please describe your target group and provide some information on size, composition and needs. All users of the Council website and intranet (staff). Size, composition and needs will be identified in the Customer Experience Workstream of the project. 3.5. Type of service Select the one that best applies to your pilot Not applicable/not available Awareness-raising information Training and education Content provision IT infrastructures and products Participation Inclusive services of general interest Other 3.6. Overall implementation approach Select the one that best applies to your pilot Public administration Private sector Non-profit sector Partnerships between administration and/or private sector and/or non-profit sector

4. Pilot description These sections of the PID describe what the pilot will do and how it will do it. 4.1. Objectives What outcomes should be delivered by the pilot? (Business case/benefits should be set out in Section 5) To deliver a new Council website that provides up to date and accurate information, the capacity for visitors to complete transactions and facilitates consultation and engagement with citizens To deliver a new Intranet site that facilitates effective working and acts as a knowledge repository To develop and embed new web governance structures, policies and guidelines to ensure content is comprehensive, correct and constantly reviewed To foster a web-focussed culture that ensures ongoing sustainability and encourages site-use To put in place a platform that is adaptable and scalable to incorporate future innovations and new technologies that support web standards. 4.2. Approach How will the pilot do this? The Web & Intranet Workstream will be set up, managed and controlled using the PRINCE 2 methodology. The project deliverables (products) will be delivered via work packages which will be the responsibility of one of the 5 workstreams of the project or, in the case of management products, of the project manager.

4.3. Deliverables What outputs/processes/procedures/definitions will be delivered by the pilot? New Council Website New Council Intranet Physical Deliverables 7 Galaxy sites from existing CapInfo sites Content Management System Hosting Infrastructure Web Governance Policies and Processes Customer Experience Definition and Strategy Business Deliverables Service and Support Arrangements Testing and Quality Approach Business Case for Council Papers Online 4.4. Exclusions What issues are outside the scope of the pilot? The following are areas excluded from the scope of the Project. The migration or re-build of current external sites onto the Jadu platform (unless specifically included during the course of implementation). Responsibility for coordinating/delivering separate web developments in departments. These should be kept to a minimum anyway as a necessity of the benefits case for rationalisation of sites. Responsibility for developing separate services and systems that need to integrate with the websites, e.g. CRM, payments engine, maps and spatial data software

4.5. Constraints What issues constrain the pilot? (These will include financial, technical, and timing issues.) The following are constraints on the project: Current lack of prioritisation of web work and lack of awareness of the strategic importance of the Web and Intranet within the culture of the Council Commitment of managers to allow departmental staff time to create and manage content Availability of staff for training and testing Technical Web expertise within the Council 4.6. Assumptions/dependencies Set out the assumptions you have made at the beginning of the pilot particularly if your pilot is dependent upon other projects/pilots. Identify external factors which may affect the pilot. It is assumed that: sufficient dedicated staff resource will be made available to the Project Team throughout the life of the project to ensure that the required products can be delivered in line with the Project Plan. The Project Board will have ultimate responsibility for securing and allocating the required resources to the Project. all budgeted financial resource for the Project will be made available in line with the agreed payment schedule incorporated into the contract(s). Any changes to the Project Objectives or Scope that fall outwith the agreed budget will be subject to a budgetary review. the provision of finance for the Project will remain the responsibility of the Council.

5. Business case Set out why your municipality feels the pilot is necessary, what the pilot seeks to achieve, and what benefits it will deliver. Include how these benefits will be measured (e.g. increased customer satisfaction, faster processing etc.). 5.1. Summary/overview The Council needs to replace its web content management system and develop a new Council Website and Intranet in order to move forward with the development of its web presence and deliver both financial and time efficiencies and an improved customer experience. 5.2. Customer benefits More useful, accessible and usable website with up to date, reliable and accurate information. Ability to complete transactions online 24/7 5.3. Performance benefits Improved Socitm Better Connected Rating Improved Customer Satisfaction Compliance with publication requirements and standards Increased service uptake 5.4. Employee benefits More efficient publishing tool More efficient Intranet 5.5. Financial benefits Lower annual support costs Reduced annual costs from rationalisation of external sites Staff time savings Lower customer contact handling costs from channel shift 5.6. Project benefits Improved Council brand image and reputation Enabler for greater social inclusion

6. Pilot management/organisation Set out the organisational structure that will manage your pilot. This should include relevant senior managers, project/pilot managers and staff. Please indicate how the pilot will be managed. Customer Services Programme Board Project Board: Council Web Board Senior Users: Senior Departmental Representatives Executive: Head of Communications Service Senior Supplier: e-government Programme Manager User Groups (internal & external) Project Manager Project Team PMO Support Customer Experience Sub-Team Technical Sub-Team Content, & Governance Workstream Customer Experience Workstream Change & Comms Workstream Testing Workstream System Architecture & Implementation Workstream

7. Staff/financial resources Set out what resources are available to deliver the pilot. This should include what budget and staff the pilot can call upon. 7.1. Funding sources Select all that apply to your pilot Public funding EU Public funding national Public funding regional Public funding local Private sector Charity, voluntary contributions 7.2. Overall cost/budget ( ) Approx 951,528 ( 850,000) 7.3. Contribution from local funds ( ) Approx 570,916 7.4. Contribution from Smart Cities (regional, in ) Approx 380,612 7.5. Contribution from Smart Cities (transnational, in ) None 7.6. Staff resources 7.5 FTE on project team supported by up to 30 staff from departments at various stages

8. Reporting framework How will the pilot report progress, both to local management and to the Smart Cities project? How will the pilot s timelines and reporting mechanisms link with reporting for the Smart Cities project? The Web Services Project will be controlled in line with PRINCE2 methodology. The Project Board must authorise the acceptance of all major products within each stage before the Project is allowed to move to the next stage. Meeting dates will be set to coincide with project milestones and decision points as far as possible and additional meetings called if required. The Project Manager will control the day to day activities of the Project through the maintenance and management of the following products: Business Case Project Plan Risk Log Issues Log Lessons Learned Log Quality Log The Project Team will meet weekly or more often as required. The Project Manager will provide the Project Board with weekly high level and monthly detailed Highlight Reports detailing progress being made, budget and resource status and any new issues that may have arisen. The Project Manager will provide End Stage reports to the Project Board at the end of each distinct Project stage. 8.1. Baselines/zero measuring What baselines do you have? Do you have evidence to how the pilot is need for this p Baselines for all project benefits are in place 8.2. How will you measure progress? How will you show how your pilot is progressing? Pre site go-live: progress according to plan Post site go-live: delivery of the benefits

8.3. How will you measure the impact of your pilot? e.g. increased citizen awareness/use of a service Delivery of the benefits 8.4. What local indicators will you use? e.g. surveys of local citizens, businesses Local web analytics Customer Satisfaction surveys 8.5. What national/transnational indicators will you use? e.g. levels of service use Socitm Better Connected Review 8.6. What work-package/subtheme indicators will you use? TBC

9. Pilot plan This should set out how the pilot will deliver the items set out in 4.3, including timelines for all deliverables and outputs. Stage 1 Project Initiation: 28/09/09 15/10/09 PID signed off Stage 2 Install & definition: 16/10/09 11/12/09 Hardware & Software installed and configured Content Approach agreed Customer Experience Research Approach agreed Stage 3 Research & preparation: 14/12/09 25/03/10 Customer Experience Research Design Brief Content Framework & Strategy Definition Web Governance Approach and Outline Plan CMS Configuration Plan Non-functional testing Stage 4 Design: 26/03/10 06/05/10 Website Designs Content Audit Full Content Migration Plan Stage 5 Build: 07/05/10 10/06/10 Website Templates Built Migration Ready Content Stage 6 Migration & Training: 11/06/10 21/07/10 Author training completed Migrated Content User Scenario Test Reports Accessibility Test Reports Intranet Implementation Plan produced Stage 7 User Acceptance Testing (UAT) 22/07/10 20/08/10 UAT completed User Functional tests completed Usability testing completed Final accessibility test completed Stage 8 Go-Live: 23/08/10 14/09/10 Pre-go-live checks completed Website Go-Live Customer Experience Standards produced Intranet Phase initiation Intranet Phase: 15/09/10 31/03/11 Implementation of Intranet site

10. Risks Set out the main risks the pilot faces and what steps you will take to manage these risks. See separate risk log: WebServices_RiskLog.xls

11. Co-design 11.1. With other organizations and institutional partners How are you working with other local organisations / institutional partners to co-design your pilot? Scotinform (http://www.scotinform.co.uk/): research participant recruitment, interviews and focus groups for Customer Experience research and usability AbilityNet (http://www.abilitynet.org.uk/): accessibility testing User Vision (http://www.uservision.co.uk/): usability reviews 11.2. Co-design with citizens and individuals How are you working with citizens and individuals to co-design your pilot? See successful submission to Consumer Focus Scotland (attached) (http://www.consumerfocus.org.uk/scotland/) project recognized as an example of best practice. 11.3. The impact of co-design How has this work changed your pilot are you doing anything differently? See successful submission to Consumer Focus Scotland

12. Transnational work 12.1. Transnational links What other municipalities and pilots are you working with as you develop/deliver your local pilot? Liaising with other Local Authorities using the same Jadu Content Management System, including Manchester City Council, East Lothian, Cheltenham Borough Council, Lichfield. Participate in online Community of Practice to share experience and best practice. 12.2. Transnational learning How are you incorporating transnational learning into the design/implementation of your pilot? Timescales did not permit formal incorporation of lessons from other partners. Informal feedback from attendance at Smart Cities meetings including Amsterdam. 12.3. Transnational outputs How will your pilot contribute to the project s transnational outputs? What transnational outputs will it contribute to, and what do you expect the contribution to look like? Presentations at Amsterdam and Edinburgh Sharing of Customer Experience Research report (attached).