uu uu uu SAR REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 2014 QuickCompass oftricare Child Beneficiaries: Utilization of Medicaid Waivered Services

Similar documents
Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Wildland Fire Assistance

section describes weighting and variance estimation. The final section describes the calculation of response rates, location rates, and

Staffing Cyber Operations (Presentation)

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

Report Documentation Page

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Conservation Law Enforcement Program Standardization

Report No. D February 9, Internal Controls Over the United States Marine Corps Military Equipment Baseline Valuation Effort

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Information Technology

The Landscape of the DoD Civilian Workforce

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Cold Environment Assessment Tool (CEAT) User s Guide

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Report No. DODIG December 5, TRICARE Managed Care Support Contractor Program Integrity Units Met Contract Requirements

User Manual and Source Code for a LAMMPS Implementation of Constant Energy Dissipative Particle Dynamics (DPD-E)

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

Potential Savings from Substituting Civilians for Military Personnel (Presentation)

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

AFRL-VA-WP-TP

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Acquisition. Air Force Procurement of 60K Tunner Cargo Loader Contractor Logistics Support (D ) March 3, 2006

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Financial Management

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Report No. D May 14, Selected Controls for Information Assurance at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Report No. D July 25, Guam Medical Plans Do Not Ensure Active Duty Family Members Will Have Adequate Access To Dental Care

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

Military Health System Conference. Psychological Health Risk Adjusted Model for Staffing (PHRAMS)

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

USAF Hearing Conservation Program, DOEHRS Data Repository Annual Report: CY2012

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

Report No. D-2011-RAM-004 November 29, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Projects--Georgia Army National Guard

Medical Requirements and Deployments

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Choose to Lose. Tammy Lindberg, Lt Col, USAF, BSC

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

World-Wide Satellite Systems Program

Current & Future Prospective Payment System

Acquisition. Diamond Jewelry Procurement Practices at the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (D ) June 4, 2003

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

Military Health System Conference. Behavioral Health Clinical Quality in the MHS : Past Present and Future

RESPONDING TO COMPOSITE FIRES: FIRST RESPONDER TRAINING MODULE

Drinking Water Operator Certification and Certificate to Operate Criteria/Requirements for US Navy Overseas Drinking Water Systems

AUGUST 2005 STATUS OF FORCES SURVEY OF ACTIVE-DUTY MEMBERS: TABULATIONS OF RESPONSES

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

TRICARE: A Regional View

AFRL-ML-WP-TP

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications: Update on DOD s Modernization

Report No. D June 17, Long-term Travel Related to the Defense Comptrollership Program

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act: Background and Issues

Preliminary Observations on DOD Estimates of Contract Termination Liability

Veterans Affairs: Gray Area Retirees Issues and Related Legislation

Technical Considerations for Alamo Lake Operation

Systems Engineering Capstone Marketplace Pilot

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

Harnessing the Power of MHS Information Systems to Achieve Meaningful Use of Health Information

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Water Usage at Forward Operating Bases

ý Award Number: MIPR 3GD3DT3083 Total Eye Examination Automated Module (TEAM) PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Colonel Francis L.

Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM

GAO AIR FORCE WORKING CAPITAL FUND. Budgeting and Management of Carryover Work and Funding Could Be Improved

2008 Post-Election Voting Survey of Federal Civilians Overseas. Tabulations of Responses

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

The Affect of Division-Level Consolidated Administration on Battalion Adjutant Sections

Transcription:

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704 0188 Tho pub!ic r~potting burden fer thi:j ccuoct.ion of information ia oatimatad to average 1 hour pet rosponao. including the time for revcewin; tnstructlont, narch.ing OJc.ioting data oou.rceo, gathorin' and maintaining the data needed, and comp-leting and reviewing tho couaction of information. Send eommanta ragard.ing thia burdon estimate or any othor aspect of this ccuoction of information. including auggeations fer r dvcing tho burden, to Dopartmant of Oafon1e. Wa:Jhin;tan Headquan r SDfVicea. Directorate fa-r tnformatton Oporationt and Reports (0704..0 188t. 1216 Joflorocn Dovio Hlghwoy, Suito 1204, Arling1cn, VA 22202 4302. Roopcndonto ohould bo owaro thot notwithotondlng ony othor prcvioicn of low, no poroon ohall bo oubjoct to any ponolty for failing to comply with o collocticn of inlormotion if it dooo not clooploy o currontly voile! OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD MM YYYYJ 12. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From To} 12-02-2015 Final Report March-May 2014 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Sa. CONTRACT NUMBER 2014 QuickCompass oftricare Child Beneficiaries: Utilization of Medicaid Waivered Services 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHORISI Sd. PROJECT NUMBER Tinney, R., Dr. Se. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAMEISI AND ADDRESSIESI 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Defense Manpower Data Center REPORT NUMBER 4800 Mark Center Drive, Suite 04El-025 DMDC Survey Note 2015-002 Alexandria, VA 22350-4000 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAMEISI AND ADDRESS(ESI 10. SPONSORIMONITOR s ACRONYMISI Office of the Under Secretary for Personnel and Readiness, Military Community & Family Policy Office of Community Support for Military Families with Special Needs 11. SPONSORIMONITOR'S REPORT 4000 Defense Pentagon NUMBER(S) Washington, DC 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT A vailnble for public release, distribution unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14.ABSTRACT This Survey Note summarizes findings from the 2014 QuickCompass oftrlcare Child Beneficiaries: Utilization of Medicaid Waivered Services (2014 QTCB). The 2014 QTCB survey was administered to collect data for an annual report submitted by the Foundation for Support of Military Families with Special Needs to the Secretary of Defense and to the Congressional defense committees. The survey focuses on utilization of progmms that can serve special needs children in military families. Topics covered include knowledge, access, and use of progmms that serve special needs children in military families, including the Exceptional Family Member Program (EFMP), TRICARE Extended Care Health Option (ECHO), Medicaid, and Medicaid Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) Waivers. 16. SUBJECT TERMS TRICARE, Medicaid, Military Families, Children with Special Needs, Medical Support for Military Families with Special Needs 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE ABSTRACT uu uu uu SAR 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 7 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Rosenfeld, Paul 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code} 571-372-0987 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/981 Proocribod by ANSI Std. Z39. 18

February 12, 2015 SURVEY NOTE Note No. 2015-002 2014 QuickCompass of TRICARE Child Beneficiaries: Utilization of Medicaid Waivered Services Introduction This Survey Note summarizes findings from the 2014 QuickCompass of TRICARE Child Beneficiaries: Utilization of Medicaid Waivered Services (2014 QTCB). The 2014 QTCB survey was administered to collect data for an annual report submitted by the Foundation for Support of Military Families with Special Needs to the Secretary of Defense and to the Congressional defense committees. The survey focuses on utilization of programs that can serve special needs children in military families. Topics covered include knowledge, access, and use of programs that serve special needs children in military families, including the Exceptional Family Member Program (EFMP), TRICARE Extended Care Health Option (ECHO), Medicaid, and Medicaid Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) Waivers. Other content areas include medical case management for children with special needs and military members decisions that affect benefits. Survey items about program eligibility and use refer to a child with special needs, defined as the first child with special needs listed by the military sponsor in the QuickCompass survey. 1 The 2014 QTCB was a census of 52,663 active duty members considered eligible based on the presence of special needs children, conducted from March 27, 2014 to May 15, 2014. Completed surveys (defined as 50% or more of the survey questions asked of all participants are answered) were received from 8,127 eligible respondents. The overall weighted response rate for eligibles was 20% which is similar to response rates currently obtained on other DoD surveys conducted by DMDC. Summary of Results Population of Military Families with Special Needs Children There are an estimated 42,289 military families with children that have special needs based on weighted survey data 2. Almost half of the military members in these families are in the Army (46%), 72% are enlisted personnel, and most (93%) are married. The majority (73%) of special needs children are between the ages of 4 and 17. Overall, the average number of special needs children per family was 1.3. The average age of a child with special needs was 10.4 years, and 64% were males. 1 For purposes of the survey, a child with special needs is defined as a child aged 0-26 with a chronic physical, developmental, behavioral, or emotional condition, who also requires health and related services of a type or amount beyond that generally required by children of that age. 2 The section on Survey Methodology below describes the weighting procedure used for the 2014 QTCB survey. 1

2014 QuickCompass of TRICARE Child Beneficiaries: Utilization of Medicaid-Waivered Services Over half (54%) of the children designated as a special needs child had special health care needs due to a physical condition(s), 48% due to a behavioral or emotional condition(s), and/or 46% because of a developmental delay. 38% indicated their child had more than one of these conditions. Exceptional Family Member Program (EFMP) Overall, 97% of military families with a special needs child reported they had heard of the EFMP. 76% of these families reported their child with special needs was eligible for the program. 93% of families with a special needs child eligible for the EFMP indicated that their child was enrolled in the program. 64% of families whose children were enrolled in the EFMP were satisfied or very satisfied with the program. Tricare Extended Care Health Option (ECHO) Medicaid Overall, 37% of military families with a special needs child reported they had heard of the TRICARE ECHO program. 69% of these families indicated their child with special needs was eligible for TRICARE ECHO. 84% of families with a special needs child eligible for TRICARE ECHO reported that their child was enrolled in the program. 72% of military families whose child was enrolled in TRICARE ECHO were satisfied or very satisfied with the program. 13% reported their special needs child has been enrolled in Medicaid, with 7% currently enrolled in the Medicaid program and 7% who had been previously enrolled but were not currently. Children with special needs who were enrolled in Medicaid received a range of health care services. The most frequently accessed services were clinic services (51%), hospital services (43%), prescription drugs (43%), and physician services (42%). 74% reported their special needs child had never been enrolled in Medicaid. Main reasons reported include the family didn t believe their child qualified for Medicaid (34%), didn t know what services and benefits Medicaid would provide 2

2014 QuickCompass of TRICARE Child Beneficiaries: Utilization of Medicaid-Waivered Services (30%), didn t want to use Medicaid (13%), and was unsure of how to apply for Medicaid (9%). Medicaid Home and Community Based (HCBS) Waivers Overall, only 7% of military families with a special needs child reported they had heard of Medicaid HCBS waivers. 30% of these military families indicated their child was eligible for the program. 46% of families with a child eligible for HCBS waivers reported their child was currently enrolled in the program, 14% indicated their child was previously enrolled but not currently and 29% reported their child had never been enrolled. 6% of military families with a member in the Army and with a special needs child reported they had heard of Medicaid HCBS waivers. 33% of these Army families indicated their child was eligible for the program. 47% of Army families with a child eligible for HCBS waivers reported their child was currently enrolled in the program, 10% indicated their child was previously enrolled but not currently enrolled and 30% reported their child had never been enrolled. 8% of military families with a member in the Navy and with a special needs child indicated they had heard of Medicaid HCBS waivers. 31% of these Navy families reported their child was eligible for the program. 50% of Navy families with a child eligible for HCBS waivers reported their child was currently enrolled in the program, 17% indicated their child was previously enrolled but not currently enrolled and 27% reported their child had never been enrolled. 7% of military families with a member in the Marine Corps and with a special needs child reported they had heard of Medicaid HCBS waivers. 37% of these Marine Corps families reported their child was eligible for the program. Results for enrollment in a Medicaid HCBS waiver are not reportable due to low numbers. 8% of military families with a member in the Air Force and with a special needs child reported they had heard of Medicaid HCBS waivers. 24% of these Air Force families indicated their child was eligible for the program. 50% of Air Force families with a child eligible for HCBS waivers reported their child was currently enrolled in the program, 17% indicated their child was previously enrolled but not currently and 29% reported their child had never been enrolled. 3

2014 QuickCompass of TRICARE Child Beneficiaries: Utilization of Medicaid-Waivered Services 6% of military families with a member who was enlisted and with a special needs child reported they had heard of Medicaid HCBS waivers. 34% of these enlisted families reported their child was eligible for HCBS waivers. 46% of enlisted families with a child eligible for HCBS waivers reported their child was currently enrolled in the program, 13% indicated their child was previously enrolled but not currently enrolled and 26% reported their child had never been enrolled. 9% of military families with a member who was an officer and with a special needs child reported they had heard of Medicaid HCBS waivers. 25% of these officer families reported their child was eligible for HCBS waivers. 47% of officer families with a child eligible for HCBS waivers reported their child was currently enrolled in the program, 14% indicated their child was previously enrolled but not currently enrolled and 37% reported their child had never been enrolled. 7% of military families with a married member and with a special needs child reported they had heard of Medicaid HCBS waivers. 29% of these families reported their child was eligible for HCBS waivers. 46% of families with a child eligible for HCBS waivers reported their child was currently enrolled in the program, 14% indicated their child was previously enrolled but not currently enrolled and 29% reported their child had never been enrolled. 4% of military families with an unmarried member and with a special needs child reported they had heard of Medicaid HCBS waivers. 51% of these families reported their child was eligible for HCBS waivers. 12% of families with a child eligible for HCBS waivers reported their child was previously enrolled but not currently enrolled in the program. Results for currently rolled and never enrolled are not reportable. Overall, 21% of military families with a special needs child currently/previously enrolled in a Medicaid HCBS waiver reported they did not have to wait before their child received services, 50% waited 1-12 months, 9% waited 13-24 months, 5% waited 25-48 months, 15% waited more than 48 months. Overall, children with special needs who were enrolled in a Medicaid HCBS waiver received a variety of health care services including case management (64%), caregiver support (58%), home based services (53%), equipment (47%), other health and therapeutic services (36%), and nursing (24%). Overall, 16% of military families whose child with special needs is currently/previously enrolled in Medicaid or who is currently/previously enrolled in Medicaid HCBS waiver 4

2014 QuickCompass of TRICARE Child Beneficiaries: Utilization of Medicaid-Waivered Services reported their child lost Medicaid benefits, including access to a Medicaid waiver due to a Permanent Change of Station (PCS) move. The loss of Medicaid benefits due to a PCS move by Service was largest for Air Force families (20%), followed by the Marine Corps (18%), Army (17%) and Navy (8%). The loss was 24% for families of officers and 14% for families of enlisted members. The loss of Medicaid benefits due to a PCS move was 17% for families with a married member and 8% for families with an unmarried member. Overall, 11% respondents in military families whose child with special needs is currently/previously enrolled in Medicaid or who is currently/previously enrolled in Medicaid HCBS waiver reported they accepted an unaccompanied tour or had gone to a new duty station without their family so that their child with special needs would not lose their Medicaid benefits. This includes access to a Medicaid waiver they were receiving at a previous duty station. Care Coordination Overall, 81% of military families with a special needs child reported their child was not enrolled in a patient centered medical home (PCMH) and only 6% were enrolled Overall, 26% of military families with a special needs child reported their child had a medical case manager or care coordinator, while 50% reported they did not. 64% of these military families reported their child receives case management from military treatment facilities, 35% from TRICARE civilian network, 31% from TRICARE ECHO case manager, 7% from Medicaid HCBS waiver,, and 2% from Medicaid. 5

2014 QuickCompass of TRICARE Child Beneficiaries: Utilization of Medicaid-Waivered Services Survey Methodology Sample Design and Selection of the 2014 QTCB The target population of the 2014 QTCB consisted of active duty members from the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force who have a child with special needs between the ages 0-26, defined as a child beneficiary between the ages 0-26 in the Disability Payment System (CDPS) high cost level 1. Data were collected on the Web between March 27 and May 15, 2014. The 2014 QTCB was a census of 59,413 active duty members who met the above criteria. Members of the sample became ineligible if they self-reported that they were not in a Service as of the first day of the survey, March 27, 2014, or did not have a child with special needs (11.36% of the sample). 3 Based on the number of members who self-reported they had no special needs children, the population estimate was adjusted downward to 52,663. Analytic weights were created to account for varying response rates among population subgroups. Each record was given a sampling weight of 1 due to the equal probability of selection per definition of a census. Then, the sampling weights were adjusted for sample members whose eligibility could not be determined. Next, the eligibility-adjusted weights were adjusted to account for variation among subgroups of differences between survey respondents and eligible sample members who did not return completed questionnaires. The adjusted weights were post-stratified to population totals and variance strata were created for variance estimation. 4 Completed surveys (defined as 50% or more of the survey questions asked of all participants are answered) were received from 8,127 eligible respondents. The overall weighted response rate for eligibles was 20%. Margins of Error The sample design of the 2014 QTCB required weighting as described above to produce population estimates such as percentages. 5 This means that the typical rules of thumb for interpreting the validity of an estimate, such as the number of respondents, will overstate the reliability of the estimate. For this report, variance estimates were calculated using SUDAAN PROC DESCRIPT. Reference DMDC. (2014a). 2014 QuickCompass of TRICARE Child Beneficiaries: Utilization of Medicaid Waivered Services: Statistical Methodology Report (Report No. 2014-011). Alexandria, VA: DMDC. 3 Although the survey was a census, DMDC uses sampling terminology to indicate that this was a sample where all in the population were included with an equal probability of selection. 4 Details on survey methodology are reported in DMDC (2014a). 5 As a result of differential weighting, only certain statistical software procedures, such as SUDAAN PROC DESCRIPT, correctly calculate standard errors, variances, or tests of statistical significance for stratified samples. Registered 2004 by Research Triangle Institute, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194. 6

2014 QuickCompass of TRICARE Child Beneficiaries: Utilization of Medicaid-Waivered Services Prepared by: Dr. Robert Tinney For further information, see http://www.dmdc.osd.mil/surveys. 7

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 12-02-2015 Final Report March-May 2014 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 2014 QuickCompass of TRICARE Child Beneficiaries: Utilization of Medicaid Waivered Services 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) Tinney, R., Dr. 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER Defense Manpower Data Center 4800 Mark Center Drive, Suite 04E1-025 Alexandria, VA 22350-4000 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) Office of the Under Secretary for Personnel and Readiness, Military Community & Family Policy Office of Community Support for Military Families with Special Needs 4000 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Available for public release, distribution unlimited. DMDC Survey Note 2015-002 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT This Survey Note summarizes findings from the 2014 QuickCompass of TRICARE Child Beneficiaries: Utilization of Medicaid Waivered Services (2014 QTCB). The 2014 QTCB survey was administered to collect data for an annual report submitted by the Foundation for Support of Military Families with Special Needs to the Secretary of Defense and to the Congressional defense committees. The survey focuses on utilization of programs that can serve special needs children in military families. Topics covered include knowledge, access, and use of programs that serve special needs children in military families, including the Exceptional Family Member Program (EFMP), TRICARE Extended Care Health Option (ECHO), Medicaid, and Medicaid Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) Waivers. 15. SUBJECT TERMS TRICARE, Medicaid, Military Families, Children with Special Needs, Medical Support for Military Families with Special Needs 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UU UU UU SAR 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 7 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Rosenfeld, Paul 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) Reset 571-372-0987 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING SF 298 1. REPORT DATE. Full publication date, including day, month, if available. Must cite at least the year and be Year 2000 compliant, e.g. 30-06-1998; xx-06-1998; xx-xx-1998. 2. REPORT TYPE. State the type of report, such as final, technical, interim, memorandum, master's thesis, progress, quarterly, research, special, group study, etc. 3. DATES COVERED. Indicate the time during which the work was performed and the report was written, e.g., Jun 1997 - Jun 1998; 1-10 Jun 1996; May - Nov 1998; Nov 1998. 4. TITLE. Enter title and subtitle with volume number and part number, if applicable. On classified documents, enter the title classification in parentheses. 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER. Enter all contract numbers as they appear in the report, e.g. F33615-86-C-5169. 5b. GRANT NUMBER. Enter all grant numbers as they appear in the report, e.g. AFOSR-82-1234. 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER. Enter all program element numbers as they appear in the report, e.g. 61101A. 5d. PROJECT NUMBER. Enter all project numbers as they appear in the report, e.g. 1F665702D1257; ILIR. 5e. TASK NUMBER. Enter all task numbers as they appear in the report, e.g. 05; RF0330201; T4112. 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER. Enter all work unit numbers as they appear in the report, e.g. 001; AFAPL30480105. 6. AUTHOR(S). Enter name(s) of person(s) responsible for writing the report, performing the research, or credited with the content of the report. The form of entry is the last name, first name, middle initial, and additional qualifiers separated by commas, e.g. Smith, Richard, J, Jr. 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES). Self-explanatory. 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER. Enter all unique alphanumeric report numbers assigned by the performing organization, e.g. BRL-1234; AFWL-TR-85-4017-Vol-21-PT-2. 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES). Enter the name and address of the organization(s) financially responsible for and monitoring the work. 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S). Enter, if available, e.g. BRL, ARDEC, NADC. 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S). Enter report number as assigned by the sponsoring/ monitoring agency, if available, e.g. BRL-TR-829; -215. 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT. Use agency-mandated availability statements to indicate the public availability or distribution limitations of the report. If additional limitations/ restrictions or special markings are indicated, follow agency authorization procedures, e.g. RD/FRD, PROPIN, ITAR, etc. Include copyright information. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES. Enter information not included elsewhere such as: prepared in cooperation with; translation of; report supersedes; old edition number, etc. 14. ABSTRACT. A brief (approximately 200 words) factual summary of the most significant information. 15. SUBJECT TERMS. Key words or phrases identifying major concepts in the report. 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION. Enter security classification in accordance with security classification regulations, e.g. U, C, S, etc. If this form contains classified information, stamp classification level on the top and bottom of this page. 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT. This block must be completed to assign a distribution limitation to the abstract. Enter UU (Unclassified Unlimited) or SAR (Same as Report). An entry in this block is necessary if the abstract is to be limited. Standard Form 298 Back (Rev. 8/98)

Additional copies of this report may be obtained from: Defense Technical Information Center ATTN: DTIC-BRR 8725 John J. Kingman Rd., Suite #0944 Ft. Belvoir, VA 22060-6218 Or from: http://www.dtic.mil/ Ask for report by ADA613092