UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

Similar documents
Subj: DETAILING AND INDIVIDUAL MILITARY COUNSEL DETERMINATION AUTHORITY FOR COUNSEL ASSIGNED TO THE MARINE CORPS DEFENSE SERVICES ORGANIZATION

Encl: (1) Statement of Understanding for Student Judge Advocates (2) Client's Statement of Understanding Regarding Use of Student Judge Advocates

Subj: RELEASE OF COUNSEL WITHOUT CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Encl: (1) Supervisory Attorney Memorandum Regarding the Right to Counsel

LEGAL SUPPORT AND ADMINISTRATION MANUAL

LEGAL SUPPORT AND ADMINISTRATION MANUAL

STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE TO THE COMMANDANT OF THE MARINE CORPS. 6 March 2014

USMC USCG supervised by a Senior Trial Counsel (O-4 or above judge advocate) and a Commanding Officer (O-6 judge advocate) and have access to 24/7 sup

STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE TO THE COMMANDANT OF THE MARINE CORPS. 21 February 2013

Subj: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE TO THE COMMANDANT OF THE MARINE CORPS

Encl: (1) Information for Walk-In Defense Counseling (2) Walk-in Counseling Roster (3) AdSep / NJP / Court-Martial Flowchart

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

LEGAL SUPPORT AND ADMINISTRATION MANUAL

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

Docket No: August 2003 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy RECORD 0

Report of. The Staff Judge Advocate. to the. Commandant. of the Marine Corps. Presented to The. American Bar Association. Annual Meeting.

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS BASE PSC BOX CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA

Military Justice Overview

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS 720 KENNON STREET SE RM 309 WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC

From: Chief Defense Counsel of the Marine Corps To: Chair, Ad Hoc Committee to Review the Criminal Justice Act Program

forwarded to Navy Personnel Command (NPC) for review because due to the mandatory processing status.

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS PACIFIC-MCB CAMP BUTLER UNIT FPO AP

Encl: (1) Commanding Officer s Screening/Interview Guide - Equal Opportunity Advisor

which are attached. They also considered your rebuttal letter dated 18 July 2002.

LEGAL SUPPORT AND ADMINISTRATION MANUAL

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

3. Mission. To publish guidelines and procedures in support of the Awards Program.

CRS Report for Congress

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY 7700 ARLINGTON BOULEVARD FALLS CHURCH, VA BUMED INSTRUCTION A CHANGE TRANSMITTAL 1

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS COMMAND 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

STATEMENT OF CAPTAIN ERIC C. PRICE, JAGC, U.S. NAVY BEFORE THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT AD HOC COMMITTEE APRIL 12, 2016

Commanding General, 2d Marine Aircraft Wing Distribution List

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY INNOVATION INCENTIVES PROGRAM

Encl: (1) Single Marine Program Billet Description (sample) (2) Quality of Life Form (3) Sample Letter of Appointment

Subj: PUBLIC AFFAIRS-VISUAL INFORMATION TRAINING WITH INDUSTRY PROGRAM

Subj: UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS GROUND ORDNANCE MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATION (USMC GOMA) AWARDS PROGRAM

DIVISION E UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE REFORM. This division may be cited as the Military Justice Act of TITLE LI GENERAL PROVISIONS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL 1322 PATTERSON AVENUE SE, SUITE 3000 WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC

SECNAVINST B CMC (MPP-35) 7 Feb 2006

2. Mission. This Order establishes procedures for JSTP training of Marine Corps personnel, in accordance with references (a) through (f).

4. Board Membership. The following personnel are designated as Board members:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WASHINGTON, DC MCO MPL:cms 25 Apr 1986

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COMMANDER UNITED STATES PACIFIC FLEET 250 MAKALAPA DRIVE PEARL HARBOR, HAWAII

- Generally, any commander who is a commissioned officer may impose NJP for minor offenses committed by members under his/her command

Commanding Officer, 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit Distribution List MERITORIOUS PROMOTION TO THE RANK OF PRIVATE FIRST CLASS THROUGH SERGEANT

COURT MARTIAL MEMBER QUESTIONNAIRE

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL 1322 PATTERSON AVENUE SE, SUITE 3000 WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNU WASHINGTON DC

ADVERTISED BILLETS. 1. TYPE BILLET: Drilling IMA. APPLICATION DEADLINE: 6 March 2013

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Subj: INFORMATION DOMINANCE CORPS COMMAND QUALIFICATION PROGRAM. Encl: (1) Sample Command Qualification Board Recommendation Letter

COMNAVCRUITCOMINST G 00J 21 Aug 2014 COMNAVCRUITCOM INSTRUCTION G. From: Commander, Navy Recruiting Command. Subj: FRATERNIZATION

VICTIMS LEGAL COUNSEL ORGANIZATION Feb 2016

From: Commanding Officer, Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center

APPELLATE MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2016 RULES

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

ADVERTISED BILLETS. 2. TYPE BILLET: Drilling IMA. BILLET: Regional JA PMOS: 4402 LOCATION: Chicago, III LOC DATES: TBD

Information Paper Applying for an Upgrade of Your Discharge/Dismissal Army Discharge Review Board

An Introduction to The Uniform Code of Military Justice

Subj: APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019 NAVY MEDICINE CAREER MILESTONE SCREENING BOARD

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

FLORIDA BAR JUDICIAL CANDIDATE VOLUNTARY SELF-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

3. Mission. To publish guidelines and procedures in support of the Awards Program.

From: Commanding Officer, Navy Recruiting District New Orleans. Subj: SENIOR/JUNIOR/SUPPORT SAILOR OF THE QUARTER/YEAR

3. Mission. To publish guidelines and procedures in support of the Awards Program.

Maj Sameit HQMC, VWAP

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS PANEL REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR 9 OCT PUBLIC MEETING

From: Commanding Officer, Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center. 2. Scope and Applicability. This instruction applies to the NMCPHC Enterprise.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Subj: ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES RELATED TO MEDICAL DEPARTMENT SPECIALTY LEADERS. (c) RESPERS M , Navy Reserve personnel Manual (RESPERSMAN)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

From: Commanding Officer, Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center

1. Situation. To provide information and instructions on the subject award, per the references.

CNATRASTAFFINST C N Mar 18

Subj: DISABILITY EVALUATION SYSTEM POLICY FOR ENROLLMENT

Subj: ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATIONS FOR CONDITIONS NOT AMOUNTING TO A DISABILITY

(1) Marine Corps Ground Safety Awards (2) Ground Safety Award Activity Groupings (3) Ground Safety Awards Nomination Format and Criteria

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 15TH MARINE EXPEDITIONARY UNIT BOX CAMP PENDLETON, CALIFORNIA

CAMP LEJEUNE ORAL AND PHOTOGRAPHIC HISTORY PROGRAM POLICY, PROCESS AND PROCEDURES. (1) Oral History Program Summary Form (2) Release Form

SECTION 1 ARLEIGH BURKE FLEET TROPHY SECTION 2 JUNIOR OFFICER AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE IN SHIPHANDLING...7-5

Subj: POLICY AND PROCEDURES CONCERNING PERSONAL AWARDS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FOREIGN AREA OFFICER PROGRAMS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS PANEL REQUEST FOR INFORMATION SET # 1. III. Special Victim s Counsel (including Navy and Marine Corps Victim s Legal Counsel)

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS EAST-MARINE CORPS BASE PSC BOX CAMP LEJEUNE NC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL 1322 PATTERSON AVENUE SE, SUITE 3000 WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC

No February Criminal Justice Information Reporting

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WASHINGTON, DC United States Marine Corps Landing Signal Officer (LSO) Program

Special Victims Counsel Intake Form

JAGINST A NJS JAG I NSTRUCTION A. Judge Advocat e General JAG CORPS TRAINING PROGRAM. Ref:

U.S. SERVICES JOINT AWARDS PROGRAM GUIDANCE. 1. Status. This is a new Allied Command Transformation (ACT) directive.

OPNAVINST C N2 18 Feb 09

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

MILITARY COMMISSIONS TRIAL JUDICIARY GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOAR3 FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY SUBMARINE FORCE ATLANTIC 7958 BLANDY ROAD NORFOLK, VA

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON. DC

Transcription:

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS CHIEF DEFENSE COUNSEL OF THE MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS DEFENSE SERVICES ORGANIZATION 701 SOUTH COURTHOUSE ROAD, BUILDING 2 RM 1D130 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2482 In Reply Refer To: 5813 CDC 24 Feb 16 CDC Policy Memo 1.5B From: Chief Defense Counsel of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List Subj: DEFENSE SERVICES ORGANIZATION AWARDS PROGRAM Ref: (a) SECNAVINST 1650.1H (b) MCO 1650.19J Ch 1 Encl: (1) Awards Flow Charts (2) Eligibility Matrix (3) DSO Marine of the Year Nomination Form (4) Defense Counsel of the Year Nomination Form Motion (5) Motion of the Year Nomination Cover Sheet 1. Purpose. To standardize procedures within the Marine Corps Defense Services Organization (DSO) in order to recognize those members of the DSO who have had the greatest positive impact on the mission of Marines Defending Marines, and to make service in the DSO something Marines in our community seek out as career enhancing and valuable. 2. Discussion. There are few more challenging tasks than those required of Marines defending Marines. Long hours and difficult work are systemic for both attorneys and legal service specialists alike. It is my honor and privilege to serve with you all, each of you as capable and professional as the next. Similarly, our clients are fortunate to have you standing by their side and diving headlong into the military justice fray each and every day. It therefore seems appropriate to formalize our existing awards program in a manner which will reflect credit on both the persons selected by the program, and the DSO as a whole. This program is intended to supplement, not replace, recognition by Commanders for meritorious performance of duty submitted in accordance with the references. 3. Policy. The DSO is divided into four regions. These regions are: National Capitol Region (NCR); East; West; and Pacific. We will recognize both legal services specialists and

attorneys throughout the DSO in an appropriate manner. I intend for the DSO to be a desirable, career-enhancing place for all attorneys and legal service specialists. One way to do this is through public recognition of exceptional performance of duty. In addition to the Department of the Navy awards listed in the references, the established DSO awards are: Marine of the Year, Defense Counsel of the Year (DECOY), the Academic Writing Award and the Motions Practice Award. Deadlines and processes for all DSO awards are outlined in enclosure (1). 4. Personal Awards. Service in the DSO is personally and professionally rewarding. DSO Marines perform a valuable service to the Marines and Sailors they represent as well as to the Marine Corps. In order to ensure proper recognition of the contributions made by DSO personnel, I am standardizing the personal award administrative procedures within the DSO. a. End of Tour (EOT). An individual is recognized for sustained superior performance at the termination of the period during which that performance was demonstrated, such as at the end of an assigned tour of duty. Defense counsel executing PCS/PCA orders from the DSO will be nominated for a personal award when appropriate. b. Letter of Continuity. A letter of continuity should be prepared when it is believed that an individual is deserving of recognition but is only being reassigned and not executing permanent change of station orders. The letter of continuity can be prepared in letter format or as a summary of action and forwarded under separate cover to the individual s new reporting senior. The information contained in the letter of continuity should then be used for an end of tour award recommendation. Likewise, when a Marine is reassigned to the DSO, the reporting senior should obtain a letter of continuity at that time from the previous reporting senior. c. Specific Achievement. A specific achievement (or impact) award may be authorized for exceptional performance over a period of short duration, which is generally no longer than twelve months. However, specific achievement awards may not support an EOT award; neither the Summary of Action nor the citation issued for the period of meritorious service shall mention the specific achievement previously recognized. DSO impact awards shall be submitted by the cognizant Regional Defense Counsel (RDC) for the DSO Marine of the Year and the DSO Defense Counsel of the Year in accordance with paragraph 7(b). Additionally, circumstances may arise in which a personal impact 2

award may be appropriate (e.g. a defense counsel prevents an imminent suicide). These awards will be provided to the RDCs for vetting and submission to the Legal Services Support Section (LSSS) OIC. d. Administrative Routing. All awards for defense counsel will be routed to the RDCs and then provided to the appropriate LSSS OICs. RDCs are responsible for originating Senior Defense Counsel (SDC) personal awards and forwarding them to the LSSS OIC. A courtesy copy of all forwarded awards will be provided to the DSO Legal Chief. The CDC will originate all RDC, Defense Counsel Assistance Program (DCAP), DSO Legal Chief, and civilian personal awards. Under no circumstances should personal awards go directly from SDCs to LSSS OICs. 5. Marine of the Year/Defense Counsel of the Year. RDCs shall establish written policies and procedures within their regions for selection of Marines worthy of recognition as DSO Regional Marine of the Year and Regional Defense Counsel of the Year (DECOY). In doing so RDCs are encouraged to consider the whole Marine concept and to solicit input from a variety of sources, including but not limited to LSSS and Legal Services Support Team (LSST) Officers in Charge, military justice personnel, military judges, and Staff Judge Advocates. a. Marine of the Year. Each Regional Defense Counsel shall establish a program to recognize the hard work and dedication of Legal Services Specialists in their region. Award eligibility criteria are depicted in enclosure (2). At a minimum: (1) Each DSO Region will recognize one Legal Services Specialist in the grade of E-5 and below as the Regional DSO Marine of the year. Regional Defense Counsel (RDCs) shall establish policies and procedures for nomination and selection within their regions, and will coordinate appropriate recognition with the Officer in Charge of the Legal Services Support Section or Team where the Marine selected is physically employed. (2) The four Regional DSO Legal Service Specialists of the Year will compete for selection as DSO Marine of the Year. RDCs will use enclosure (3) to submit their Regional DSO nominations. The Chief Defense Counsel of the Marine Corps (CDC), in consultation with the DSO Legal Chief and Reserve Chief Defense Counsel of the Marine Corps, will make the final selection. 3

b. Defense Counsel of the Year(DECOY). In addition to the foregoing, each RDC shall establish a program to recognize the hard work and dedication of Judge Advocates in their region. Award eligibility criteria are depicted in enclosure (2). At a minimum: (1) Each DSO Region will recognize one Judge Advocate in the grade of O-4 and below as the Regional Defense Counsel of the year (DECOY). Senior Defense Counsel (SDCs) and RDCs are ineligible. RDCs shall establish policies and procedures for nomination and selection within their regions, and will coordinate appropriate recognition with the Officer in Charge of the Legal Services Support Section or Team where the Judge Advocate selected is physically employed. (2) The four Regional DECOY will compete for selection as DSO DECOY. RDCs will use enclosure (4) to submit their Regional DSO nominations. The Chief Defense Counsel of the Marine Corps (CDC), in consultation with the DSO Highly Qualified Experts, the Officer in Charge, Defense Counsel Assistance Program, and the Reserve Chief Defense Counsel of the Marine Corps, will make the final selection. c. Nomination Process. Each RDC shall submit their nominee for DSO Marine of the year and DECOY at least sixty calendar days prior to the annual DSO World-Wide Community Training. Use enclosures (3) and (4) for all submissions. 6. Writing Awards. Defending Marines requires far more than oral advocacy. An effective advocate is also an accomplished researcher and writer. The DSO Writing Awards will recognize the best in academic writing and motions practice in order to encourage our personnel to hone their research skills, improve their writing capability, and enhance the professionalism of the military legal community. This competition also establishes an effective mechanism for ensuring the top 60+ motions of each calendar year become available to the entire DSO, thereby strengthening our collective ability to more effectively represent and defend our clients. There are two categories eligible for recognition, academic writing and motions practice. a. Academic Writing Award. The DSO Academic Writing Award is an annual award intended to encourage DSO attorneys to submit articles for publication in professional journals, including but not limited to, law reviews and military professional journals. If there are no academic articles submitted during the award period, there shall be no award for that period. 4

(1) Eligibility Criteria. Nominees must: (a) Be in the grade O-4 or below; (b) Be in a Defense Counsel billet at the time the article is published; (c) Not be a Regional Defense Counsel; (d) Be published during the established annual award period of 1 December to 30 November; (e) Be published in a recognized professional law review or journal, for example The Army Lawyer or The Marine Corps Gazette; length; (f) Have published a writing at least 1,500 words in (g) Have published in a subject of general interest to the legal or military community. (2) Articles written as part of an academic program are eligible so long as the author is a member of the DSO upon publication. (3) Nominations may be submitted via email by any member of the DSO through the individual defense counsel s operational chain of command. Include appropriate citation to the source document in the nomination. (4) Submissions are encouraged, but not mandatory. (5) Nominations are due to the Chief Defense Counsel of the Marine Corps no later than 30 calendar days after the end of the established award period. Should the 30th day fall on a Holiday or Weekend, nominations are due the last business day preceding that Holiday or Weekend. (6) The CDC, in consultation with the Reserve CDC and DCAP, is the final arbiter of this award. b. DSO Motions Practice Award. The DSO Motions Practice Award is an annual award intended to encourage a vigorous motions practice across the Marine Corps. Second, it is intended to facilitate healthy turnover of new and updated 5

motions in our DSO Motions Database. Extraordinary Writs are specifically included as eligible for this award. (1) Eligibility Criteria. (a) The award period is 1 December to 30 November. The motion must have been filed with the Navy and Marine Corps Trial Judiciary, the Navy and Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, IRO officer, or board during the established award period. (b) Substantial portions of the motion must have been drafted by the nominated counsel. Some duplication of minor administrative matters between motions is acceptable. If more than one counsel drafted the motion, the primary author will be the nominee. Disputes over primary counsel will be resolved at the Senior Defense Counsel (SDC) level. (c) Relief from the Trial or Appellate Court is a factor which adds credibility to the righteous nature of the motion, but is not in-and-of-itself determinative. (d) While there is no minimum or maximum length for nominated motions, a good rule of thumb is that a motion should be, as long as necessary and as short as possible. (e) The forum in which the motion was submitted (General Court-Martial, Special Court-Martial, Summary Court- Martial, Initial Review Officer Hearing, Board of Inquiry, or Administrative Separation Board) is irrelevant. (f) The Chief Defense Counsel of the Marine Corps, RDCs, DCAP, and Civilian Litigation Experts are not eligible for this award. (2) Nominations Process. (a) Defense Counsel. Participation in the DSO Motions Practice Award is mandatory. Each Defense Counsel in the DSO shall, at a minimum, submit one motion for consideration by his or her Senior Defense Counsel. On or before 30 November, select a motion you believe meets the relevant eligibility requirements. Scrub all motions of personally identifiable information (PII). Submit an electronic copy to your SDC, along with the completed defense counsel section of the nomination cover sheet (encl (5)). Do not include enclosures, appendices, exhibits, or attachments. 6

(b) Senior Defense Counsel. On or before 15 December forward all motions electronically to your RDC. Select the best nomination and forward with completed SDC comments to the RDC for consideration (encl (5)). If the SDC wrote an original motion during the past calendar year, the SDC may submit that motion to the RDC for consideration in addition to the nominated motion. (c) Regional Defense Counsel. On or before 1 January forward all motions to the Officer In Charge, Defense Counsel Assistance Program. Select one nominee from your region. Forward your nomination for the DSO Motions Practice Award to the CDC with the completed cover sheet (encl (5)). (d) Reserve CDC/Civilian Litigation Specialists/DCAP. On or before 1 February provide input on the four finalists to the CDC. (e) Should any designated due date fall on a Holiday or Weekend, nominations are due the last business day preceding that Holiday or Weekend. (f) The CDC is the final arbiter of this award, with advice from DCAP. (g) The DSO Motions Practice Award will be presented in an appropriate ceremony at the Annual DSO World-Wide Community Training Event. c. Judging Criteria. (1) Senior Defense Counsel. SDCs have discretion to select the best motion submitted by their counsel during the award period. While the SDC selection criteria are discretionary, the nomination should be informed by, and nested within, CDC criteria. (2) Regional Defense Counsel. RDCs have discretion to select the best motion nominated by their SDCs. While the RDC criteria are discretionary, the nomination should be informed by, and nested within, CDC criteria. (3) CDC criteria. (a) Rubric: 7

Persuasiveness Originality Citations Punctuation/Grammar Style Format 45% 20% 15% 10% 5% 5% (b) Persuasiveness-45%. Above all else, a motion must be persuasive. Persuasiveness is a subjective determination made by the CDC and informed by: relief granted (if any), input from the Reserve CDC, nominating RDC, nominating SDC, and the OIC of DCAP. (c) Originality-20%. Originality is a subjective judgment based on the novelty of the issue. For instance, a standard motion to compel witnesses would generally not score very high in originality. An ADSEP motion for an out of area witness to testify via FaceTime would grade higher. A motion to compel a former interpreter from Iraq with Department of State support would score high in originality. (d) Citations-15%. Citations need to be correct and accurate. This builds credibility in the argument and credibility with the judge. (e) Punctuation/Grammar-10%. Great attorneys can write well. Proper punctuation and grammar count. (f) Format-5%. While the substance of a motion should govern, the format and presentation is important. This recognition program will utilize the local circuit formatting conventions. (g) Style-5%. The writer s voice, also known as style, is very important. This is a subjective determination made by the CDC and informed by input from the Reserve CDC, nominating RDC, nominating SDC, and the OIC of DCAP. c. Subordinate Element Missions: (1) DCAP. (a) Collect any and all academic writing submissions and distribute to the CDC, Reserve CDC, and Civilian Litigation Specialists for review. (b) Compile all submitted motions for CD/hard drive distribution at the CDC conference and/or SharePoint. Be prepared to provide highlights from the newly created motions bank during the DSO World-Wide Community Training Event. 8

(2) Civilian Litigation Specialists. Provide a nonmilitary perspective on the quality of nominated motions. 7. Recognition. a. Award recipients will be publically recognized at the CDC conference and will be included on a recognition plaque to be displayed at the office of the CDC. b. Recipients of the Marine of the Year and the Defense Counsel of the Year will be nominated for a Specific Achievement Award (as a Competitive Accomplishment) Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal by the RDC of the region where the nominee is physically employed in accordance with references (a) and (b). The DSO Academic Writing Award and the DSO Motions Practice Award recipients will receive a letter of appreciation from the CDC for inclusion within their OMPF. c. Award recipients and the regional nominees for Marine of the year and DECOY shall be included in a MARADMIN submitted for release by the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps announcing the selection. d. Each award recipient, including the DECOY, DSO Marine of the Year (when a Sergeant), the DSO Academic Writing Award, and the DSO Motion Practice Award receive a commendatory Fitness Report. (1) For the Defense Counsel of the Year or Marine of the Year, include a comment substantially similar to the following in the Marine s Section I: Directed Comment, Sect A, Item 6a: MRO was selected by the Chief Defense Counsel of the Marine Corps as the recipient of the 20[XX] [DSO Defense Counsel of the Year][DSO Marine of the Year]. [MRO s was selected over [70 of his or her peers][12 of his or her peers]. This award is reflective of superior MOS technical and tactical proficiency.] (2) For the DSO Academic Writing Award, and the DSO Motion Practice Award, include a comment substantially similar to the following in the Marine s Section I: Directed Comment, Sect A, Item 6a: MRO [drafted the motion][authored a published article] and was selected by the Chief Defense Counsel of the Marine Corps as 9

the recipient of the 20[XX] [DSO Academic Writing Award][DSO Motions Practice Award]. [MRO s article (include amplifying comments about article, e.g. where published, significance of issues addressed, etc.)] OR [MRO s motion was selected out of thousands of motions submitted by over 70 defense attorneys and is reflective of superior MOS technical and tactical proficiency.] 8. Conclusion. The point of contact for this program is DCAP. This CDC Policy Memo is effective immediately. Distribution List: SJA to CMC Legal Chief of the Marine Corps All Marine Corps SJAs LSSS OICs LSST OICs All members of the DSO NMCTJ Code 52, OJAG STEPHEN C. NEWMAN 10

MARINE CORPS DEFENSE SERVICES ORGANIZATION MARINE OF THE YEAR NOMINATION FORM Thank you for taking the time to nominate one of our 4421 as Marine Corps Defense Services Organization Marine of the Year. The intent of this award is to recognize the DSO 4421 who has best epitomized the DSO Creed during this past Calendar Year: We are Marines Judge Advocates and Legal Services Specialists who are dedicated to defending our fellow Marines and Sailors, by providing them legal counsel in any matter required by statute, regulation, or otherwise authorized. We are zealous advocates for our clients, serving independently of the local chain of command and under the supervision of the Marine Corps Defense Services Organization. We zealously represent each and every client within the guidelines of the law, consistent with our professional ethics, and in accordance with our rules of practice. We selflessly perform our duties with the utmost integrity, motivation and pride, without fear of reprisal, or expectation of professional or personal gain. In the same spirit as Taking Care of Our Own, we are: Marines Defending Marines. In order to be eligible the 4421 must have served with the DSO during the last calendar year and remain on active duty through the date determined by the Chief Defense Counsel of the Marine Corps (published separately). The DSO Marine of the Year will be announced and recognized during the Annual DSO World-wide Community Training (DSO WWCT). It is not necessary that the nominee presently be a member of the DSO. Neither is it required that the nominee be present at the annual DSO WWCT, although it is preferred. Anyone may submit a nomination, which should be submitted on this form through the Nominee s RDC, but the four Regional DSO Marines of the year are automatic nominations. All nominations must be submitted sixty (60) calendar days prior to the first day of the DSO WWCT. Please complete as much of this form as possible, understanding that you may not have access to all the information requested. 1. Your Info: 2. Nominee s Name: 3. Nominee s Billets during the last calendar year: 4. Nominee s Current Battalion / Squadron Commander: 1 Encl (3)

5. Narrative Description why this Nominee should be DSO Marine of the Year: 6. Statistics: A. Number of Defense Counsel in Nominee s section: B. Cases processed by this section in the last calendar year, including pleas and Board Waivers: -GCMs: -SPCMs: -BOIs: -AdSep Boards: 7. Mentorship Please identify or describe specific examples of the Nominee teaching, training, or mentoring others in order to improve the practice of law: 8. Honoring the Creed Please identify or describe specific examples of how the Nominee honored the DSO Creed in the performance of his or her duties with the DSO. 9. Professionalism - Describe how this Nominee interacts with members of the opposite side of the bar, members of the Judiciary, Staff Judge Advocates, Officers-in-Charge, Law Center Directors, Convening Authorities, and family members of their clients. 10. Non-DSO duties - Does this Nominee have any non-duty related accomplishments worthy of consideration (e.g. volunteer work, significant accomplishments in PME, publication, deployments, or other awards received during this period)? If so, please describe. 11. Other Information: 2 Encl (3)

MARINE CORPS DEFENSE SERVICES ORGANIZATION DEFENSE COUNSEL OF THE YEAR (DECOY) NOMINATION FORM Thank you for taking the time to nominate one of our officers as DSO-wide Defense Counsel of the Year (DECOY). Wins and losses in the courtroom are important, but they matter less than recognizing the Judge Advocate in the DSO who has had the greatest impact in their region and the DSO over the last calendar year. In order to be eligible the Officer must have practiced as a defense counsel in the Region at some point during the last calendar year, and remain on active duty through a date specified by the Chief Defense Counsel of the Marine Corps (published separately). The DECOY will be announced and recognized during the Annual DSO World-wide Community Training (WWCT). It is not necessary that the nominee presently hold a Defense Counsel billet. Neither is it necessary that the nominee be present at the WWCT, but it is preferred. Anyone may submit a nomination, which should be submitted on this form through the Nominee s RDC, but the four Regional DECOY are automatic nominations. All nominations must be submitted sixty (60) calendar days prior to the first day of the DSO WWCT. Please complete as much of this form as possible, understanding that you may not have access to all the information requested. 1. Your Info (Name, Billet, Phone Number): 2. Nominee s Name: 3. Nominee s Billets during the last calendar year: 4. Nominee s Current Battalion / Squadron Commander: 5. Narrative Description why this Nominee should be DSO DECOY: 6. Statistics: A. Number of Defense Counsel in Nominee s section: B. Cases processed by this section in the last calendar year, including pleas and Board Waivers: -GCMs: -SPCMs: -BOIs: 1 Encl (4)

-AdSep Boards: C. Number of cases processed by this Nominee in the last calendar year, including pleas and Board Waivers: -GCMs (Identify # contested): -SPCMs (Identify # contested): -BOIs: -AdSep Boards: 7. Mentorship Please identify or describe specific examples of the Nominee teaching, training, or mentoring others in order to improve the practice of law: 8. Motion Practice - What motions have been written and argued by this Nominee? Identify the most significant motion written, the issues it addressed, how it well it was argued. Were there any creative or unique interpretations of the law advocated? Persuading the court on a particular point of law or motion should be noted, but prevailing on a motion for appropriate relief is not the most important factor to consider for the purpose of this nomination. 9. Advocacy In Contested Cases - Identify the Nominee s most significant accomplishment in a contested trial. Describe the Nominee s style and effectiveness with regards to advocacy, understanding of the Rules for Courts- Martial and Rules of Evidence, and how quickly he or she thinks on his or her feet in a contested trial. Acquittals and whether the trial was members or judge alone should be noted, but are not the most important factors to consider for the purposes of this nomination. 10. Advocacy in Uncontested Cases - Identify the Nominee s most significant accomplishment in a guilty plea. Describe the Nominee s style and effectiveness with regards to advocacy, understanding of the Rules for Court-Martial and Rules of Evidence, and how quickly he or she thinks on his or her feet in a guilty plea. Significant accomplishments and whether the plea was members or judge alone on sentence should be noted, but are not the most important factors to consider for the purposes of this nomination. 11. Post-Trial Matters - How effectively does this nominee advocate in the posttrial process? How well are post-trial matters written and advocated? Identify the most significant post-trial matter or issue raised or addressed by this nominee, if any. Identify any significant post-trial relief granted. 2 Encl (4)

12. Professionalism - Describe how this Nominee interacts with members of the opposite side of the bar, members of the Judiciary, Staff Judge Advocates, Officers-in-Charge, Law Center Directors, Convening Authorities, and family members of their clients 13. Non- DC duties - Does this Nominee have any non-duty related accomplishments worthy of consideration (e.g. volunteer work, significant accomplishments in PME, publication, deployments, or other awards received during this period)? If so, please describe. 14. Other Information - Please provide any other information you consider relevant to this nomination. 3 Encl (4)

To Be Completed by Defense Counsel: Motion Cover Sheet: Name: Relief Requested: Date Filed: Motion (Generally): Relief Granted: Date Argued: To be completed by SDC only for nominated motion: Comments: To be completed by RDC only for nominated motion: Comments: 4 Encl (5)