A r m y S c i e n c e & Te c h n o l o g y

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Advanced Tactical Computer Science and Sensor Technology

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Command, Control, Communications Technology

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

Defense Daily Open Architecture Summit EMS Panel

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Mission Command. Lisa Heidelberg. Osie David. Chief, Mission Command Capabilities Division. Chief Engineer, Mission Command Capabilities Division

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #50

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

CHAPTER 4 MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNIT CAPABILITIES Mission. Elements of Intelligence Support. Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) Electronic Warfare (EW)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

United States Army Special Operations Aviation Command (USASOAC)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Presentation to AFCEA

GOOD MORNING I D LIKE TO UNDERSCORE THREE OF ITS KEY POINTS:

Detect, Deny, Disrupt, Degrade and Evade Lethal Threats. Advanced Survivability Suite Solutions for Mission Success

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Global EOD Symposium & Exhibition

Communications, Electronics, Research, Development and Engineering Center (CERDEC)

aselsan EW SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

C4I System Solutions.

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #20

Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

SPS-TA THALES AIRBORNE SYSTEMS INTEGRATED SELF-PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR TRANSPORT AND WIDE-BODY AIRCRAFT.

UNCLASSIFIED. RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) COST (Dollars in Millions) FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 Cost to Complete

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: ASW Systems Development

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #32

Capabilities Development & Integration Directorate. Dismounted Mission Command

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Night Vision Systems Advanced Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Tactical Technology Office

NETWORKING THE SOLDIER ARMY TACTICAL NETWORK MODERNIZATION APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED. AUGUST 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

AFCEA Mission Command Industry Engagement Symposium

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

COE. COE Snapshot APPLICATIONS & SERVICES CONNECTING OUR SOLDIERS EXAMPLE SERVICES. COE Enables. EcoSystem. Generating Force

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems FY 2012 OCO

Briefing for Industry

Training and Evaluation Outline Report

AGI Technology for EW and AD Dominance

3 rd Annual Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Summit

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Force 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.

Ensured Operations in the Commons: Counter-AA/AD Technologies of Interest

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #45

U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC)

Apache Fire Control LM MFC Supplier Summit TM

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

CURRICULUM OUTLINE OF INSTRUCTION SURFACE WARFARE OFFICER DEPARTMENT HEAD COURSE CIN: A-4H-0107 CDP: 9545 VER: 2.0 CHANGE: 3

Future Force Capabilities

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : DIGITAL BATTLEFLD COMM.

Single Integrated Ground Picture

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO

F-35 Lightning II A New Generation of Fighter

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE BB / SOF Visual Augmentation, Lasers and Sensor Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Denied, Degraded and Disrupted

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare & Combating Terrorism S&T Department

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ENABLING ARMAMENTS ACQUISITION MODERNIZATION

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Common Data Link Executive Agent (CDL EA) FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Joint Automated Deep Operation Coordination System (JADOCS)

MISSILE S&T STRATEGIC OVERVIEW

Speaking with One Voice

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Col Alan Pratt, USMC Commander. Distribution Statement A Approved for Public Release. Mr. Matthew Craig Acting Technical Director

Colonel Laurie Moe Buckhout Department of the Army Chief, Army Electronic Warfare Division

Transcription:

A r m y S c i e n c e & Te c h n o l o g y C3I Portfolio Overview Mr. Kris Gardner Director C3I Portfolio Office of the Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of the Army for Research and Technology

Command, Control, Communications, Intelligence (C3I) Portfolio Vision Soldiers at the tactical edge have trusted and responsive sensors, communications, and information adaptable in dynamic, austere environments to support battlefield operations and non-kinetic warfare Adapt - Adopt - Develop 2

FY14 C3I Portfolio C3I Portfolio 6.2 and 6.3 Funding $334M SMDC 2% TARDEC 1% ERDC 9% CERDEC 67% ARL 20% Communications Mission Command Sensors Intelligence / Electronic Warfare $72M $100M $120M $43M Investment Areas - Antennas - Mobile Networking - Network Protection - Space Investment Areas - Information Planning - Presentation/ Displays - Battlefield Environments Investment Areas - Electro-Optical - Infrared - Non-Imaging - Radio Frequency - Counter Sensor/ Sensor Protection - Sensor Integration Investment Areas - Information Fusion - Electronic Warfare Source: Army Science and Technology Management Information System (ASTMIS) PB14 3

C3I - Communications Sub-portfolio Goal: Provide aware, adaptive, secure, on-demand communications from Battalion to the Squad level in all environments and terrains to allow the Soldier the connectivity and situational awareness necessary to complete the mission S&T Major Efforts Include: - Affordable, Low Profile Terrestrial & Satellite Antennas - Tactical Information Assurance and Mobile Networking - Communications/Antenna Modeling & Simulation - Electromagnetic compatibility and interference mitigation TODAY: Limited Topside Space, Adverse Antenna Interactions, Large Platform Visual Signature Embedded Antenna Apertures Distributed Around the Platform Legacy/Existing Systems include: - WINT - EPLRS - SINCGARS -CREW -FBCB2 Near Term Objectives: - Components and materials for conformal multiband antennas - M&S to minimize cosite interference for extend effective range of comms systems and jammers - Software for policy-based spectrum & network management tools - HW/SW for Bi-directional cross domain communications - Intelligent agent software for security applications, cloud computing, and application authentication to minimize the effectiveness of computer network attack Mid-Far Term Objectives: - Operating through the presence of cyber operations and electromagnetic attacks - Communications interoperability/integration across heterogeneous systems - Enable effective communications and operations in a spectrum constrained environment - Self healing self managing network - Lower/no signature communications/antennas Army Stakeholders: - ARL - PEO MS - TARDEC - PM DCATS - CERDEC - SMDC - PEO Soldier - PEO C3T - PEO IEWS External Stakeholders: - Office of Naval Research - DARPA - Air Force Research Lab - Space Test Program 4

C3I - Mission Command Sub-portfolio Goal: Develop methodologies for secure, timely, data storage, mining, processing and retrieval to effectively manage digital assets (imagery, applications, geospatial, environmental) for knowledge based decisions over available communications assets from Battalion down to the Squad/Soldier S&T Major Efforts Include: Decision Support and Mission Execution Tools Fine resolution atmospheric modeling and local area meteorological forecasting Integrated Soldier based Battlefield Combat Identification Geospatial Tool design, and development Position/Navigation in GPS denied environments Near Term Objectives: Reduce tactical surprise by providing proactive decision support tools, red/blue SA, improved access to high value information, mutually supportive collaboration, and target ID and handoff capabilities across a range of network conditions - Develop actionable geospatial, population and environmental data, information and pattern software services - Low SWaP/cost CID technologies for dismounts Mid-Far Term Objectives: - Virtual mobile mission command capability common in the generating and expeditionary force - Ad Hoc Small Team Collaboration capabilities - Non-Cooperative target identification for dismounts - Fusion, exploitation and dissemination of Ad Hoc data from unknown data sources to feed right person, right data Legacy/Existing Systems include: - FBCB2 - Tactical Ground Reporting System TiGR - AN/PSQ-23 STORM Laser Rangefinder - AN/PEQ-2 & AN/PEQ-15 Laser Pointers - PLGR, DAGR Army Stakeholders: - CERDEC - ERDC - ARL - PEO C3T - PEO IEWS External Stakeholders: DARPA USMC Air Force - ARDEC - NATICK - PEO STRI - PEO Soldier NOAA NASA 5

Tactical Information Sharing Purpose: Develop software tools for Android and Web based environments that let Soldiers more easily share information, ask questions to larger communities, and filter for relevant information in a way that is consistent with familiar social networking tools. Schedule Elements FY13 FY14 FY15 Direct Mobile to Mobile Information Sharing Direct Mobile to Command Post Sharing Mobile to Web and Web Client 5 5 6 6 6 Products: Mobile Tactical Client Applications Web application (HTML5 + Javascript) Android handheld application Local server based applications to provide capability at lowest echelons and minimize use of bandwidth Web Services for 3 rd parties to access capability Payoff: Soldiers achieve a greater understanding of their environment by sharing observations about enemy activity Soldiers are more operationally agile because the can more effectively collaborate. By providing more flexible tools with a familiar user experience Soldiers can better adapt as needs on the ground change 6

C3I Sensors Sub -portfolio Goal: Improve SA, targeting and target handover by effectively integrating/networking sensors and sensor data from traditional and non-traditional sources to extend coverage, lower false alarm rates and increase probability of detection of moving and stationary air and ground threats S&T Major Efforts Include: -Infrared sensor, component, and modeling development -Soldier sensor components and image processing -Acoustic & Electro-Magnetic sensing -Radar antenna, transmit/receiver modules and software technique development and testing -Radar (SAR/GMTI) & SIGINT data processing and exploitation Legacy/Existing Systems Include: - 2 nd Gen FLIR - Enhanced Night Vision Goggle - Guardrail Common Sensor - Persistent Threat Detection System (PTDS) - AN/TPQ 36/37 Firefinder Radar Near Term Objectives: - Precise targeting handoff for dismounts - Provide affordable near 360 o situation awareness in complex/urban terrain for ground vehicles - 3D Detection, ID and Precision Geolocation of Modern Comms thru Multipath /Co-Channel Interference and Jamming - Reduce detectability of existing camouflage nets by IR sensors - Affordable high quality 1280 X 720 dual band SLS Arrays - High Operating Temperature, large format (5000 X 5000) MWIR subarrays Mid-Far Term Objectives: - Develop affordable high definition cooled and uncooled IR FPAs - Network sensors to permit smart sensor management, correlation, cross-cueing and integrated tracking of threats - Cost effective persistent surveillance (persistent area assessment) - Mining patterns of life actionable intelligence from gigabytes of raw E-sensor data Army Stakeholders: - ARL - NSRDEC - CERDEC - PEO Aviation - PEO IEWS - TARDEC - TRADOC - PEO M&S - PEO Soldier External Stakeholders: - DARPA - Air Force Research Lab - Naval Research Lab - SOCOM 7

Mast Mounted Advanced Sensors Increases Force Protection and Enables Lethality Against Full Spectrum Threats (including hybrid and small UAV) Via Ground Based Persistent Surveillance Schedule MILESTONES FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Planning / Tech Assessment: AOA, Demos, Test Sensor-Shooter Demo Modeling and Simulation: Algorithm Development: System Prototype Build: Demos/Technology Insertions Persistent Surveillance Sensors (PSS) MTI Radar Large Format FLIR w/irst 5 Laser Day TV 6 Purpose: Demonstrate ability to detect and recognize personnel targets and small UAVs, via ground based passive Infrared Search and Track (IRST) persistent surveillance Products: Demonstrate enhanced passive/active scalable, wide area, multi sensor target detection and recognition and localized persistent surveillance capability that includes Large format infrared focal plane array for detection, identification and persistent surveillance integrated into tower based platform IRST algorithms for passive personnel and UAV detection Integration with existing RADAR for Electro-optic/ infrared sensor slew-to-cue (detect moving personnel threats) Payoff: Long range rapid passive and positive recognition of personnel targets and detection of UAVs for improved force protection against the asymmetric threat 8

C3I Intelligence and Electronic Warfare Subportfolio Goal: Provide maneuver forces the ability to detect, identify, exploit, locate in 3 dimensions, disrupt and neutralize, IEDs, tactical and modern RF signals and advanced devices in a dense signal environment S&T Major Efforts Include: Tactical multi-function electronic warfare planning and management tools and techniques Jamming techniques for counter IED missions EO/IR/RF Countermeasures for helicopter survivability Architectures and standards for intelligence data collection (RADAR, SIGINT, HUMINT) Attack/exploitation tools (Techniques development and testing All-Source SA, analytics and exploitation software applications development Near Term Objectives: Provide Small Units with tools and training to efficiently collect, process, exploit, and disseminate data to support situational awareness and decision making Develop ability to exploit unconventional sensing modalities for more robust threat detection (magnetic, e-field, hyperspectral) Develop surgical techniques to disrupt and or neutralize emerging threat signals Mid-Far Term Objectives: Coexistence of Comms and EW in the same spectrum without impact to either mission User-context-tailored, real-time, mixed reality / augmented reality SA and COA User aware Process Exploitation and Dissemination of information and Intelligence Detect, identify, exploit, locate, disrupt and neutralize RF systems in dense co-channel, and multi-path environments Legacy/Existing Systems include: DCGS-A ABCS FBCB2 CREW AAR-47 Navy UV Warner ATIRCM Infrared CM Army Stakeholders: CERDEC ARL SMDC AMRDEC PEO C3T CREW Duke V2 System DCGS-A System - PEO IEWS - ARCYBER - INSCOM - Army G2 External Stakeholders: DARPA - NRL - NSWC OSD - NSA - Navy AFRL - SOCOM PMA 272 NRL - SPAWAR 9

Integrated EW / Comms Purpose: Enable EW and tactical communication systems to operate at the simultaneously without compromising each other. Market Survey Schedule & Cost FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Characterize EW System Output Investigate configurability and data provided by SRW & EW systems Scheduling Algorithm Inter platform coordination protocol Interface between collocated EW & Comms system Simulation Environment Overall System Architecture Signals Management module Modify EW and Comms waveforms to implement algorithm selections Integration & Testing Turn that Off!! I can t communicate! No!! IEDs are out there! Schedule 3 4 5 6 Product: Algorithms & Software to coordinate spectral utilization of EW & Communications functions Power Amplifier model that predicts unintended jammer emissions Interfaces specification for interface between collocated EW & Communications systems Simulation environment to facilitate protocol development & compatibility testing System prototype Demonstration Payoff: Minimal reduction of COMMS throughput, range, and frequency tunability due to cosite EW system. EW effectiveness or range is not reduced to accommodate co-site Communications. 10

C3I S&T Portfolio Summary C3I Portfolio Challenges Portfolio is complex and significantly impacts other S&T and capability portfolios The rapidly changing commercial electronics market is difficult to adapt to Army capabilities Disruptive and Leap-Ahead technologies such as nano-satellites and EW/Cyber capabilities can give the Army an edge in future conflicts 11

WebPortal for Army wide Industry Engagement Defense Innovation Marketplace http://defenseinnovationmarketplace.mil/armyinformation.html 12

A r m y S c i e n c e & Te c h n o l o g y