HIMSS 2011 Implementation of Standardized Terminologies Survey Results

Similar documents
Standardized Terminologies, Information Technology, Objectives. Trendssssss!

Dianne Conrad DNP, RN, FNP-BC Cadillac Family Physicians, PC Cadillac, MI July 21, 2011

Terminology in Healthcare and

SNOMED CT for Nursing

Informatics Essentials

2004 HIMSS NATIONAL HEALTH INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE SURVEY. July 21, 2004

CMS-0044-P; Proposed Rule: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Stage 2

Nursing Knowledge: Big Data Research for Transforming Healthcare HIMSS NI Nurse Executive Workgroup January 9, 2014

UPDATE ON MEANINGFUL USE. HITECH Stimulus Act of 2009: CSC Point of View

A Framework for Sharing Nursing Data: The Quality Jackpot

ARRA New Opportunities for Community Mental Health

Exploring the challenges and possibilities of data. a guide to nursing and health care informatics

Initial Commentary on Meaningful Use Final Rule

Standardized Terminologies Used in the Learning Health System

HT 2500D Health Information Technology Practicum

9/28/2011. Learning Agenda. Meaningful Use and why it s here. Meaningful Use Rules of Participation. Categories, Objectives and Thresholds

Clinical Care Classification (CCC) System Seminar University of Eastern Finland. Kuopio Campus, Finland June 2, 2015

U.S. Healthcare Problem

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Clinical Quality Measures Are You Ready?

Enhancing Patient Care through Effective and Efficient Nursing Documentation

3M Health Information Systems. The standard for yesterday, today and tomorrow: 3M All Patient Refined DRGs

Electronic Health Records and Meaningful Use

Post Acute Continuum Lessons Learned from Geisinger s ProvenHealth Navigator

Management Engineering & Process Improvement Community

2018 HIMSS U.S. Leadership and Workforce Survey

Career Options in Health Care Informatics

Meaningful Use of Health Information Technology Requires a Competent Workforce

Roll Out of the HIT Meaningful Use Standards and Certification Criteria

Adopting Accountable Care An Implementation Guide for Physician Practices

KPMG Digital Health Pulse April 2017

June 19, Submitted Electronically

ARRA HEALTH IT INCENTIVES - UNCERTAINTIES ABOUT "MEANINGFUL USE"

An EHR Overview for Pharma Marketers

Developing standardised terminologies to support nursing practice

Health Care Degrees and Certificate Programs Flexible and affordable degree programs for health care careers

The Road to Clinical Transformation

Advocate Cerner Partnership Creates Big Data Analytics for Population Health

Patient / Consumer Engagement - Key to Successful Population Health Management

The Evolving Landscape of Healthcare Payment: Incentive Programs and ACO Model Optimization. Quality Forum August 19, 2015

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

HIMSS Nicholas E. Davies Award of Excellence Case Study Nebraska Medicine October 10, 2017

Jumpstarting population health management

Unleash Healthcare Information Technology for Successful Sites, Investigators and Subjects

A Framework for Evaluating Electronic Health Records Overview - Applying to the Davies Ambulatory Awards Program Revised May 2012

emeasures: Everything You Want To Know

Moving HIT and Meaningful Use

IMPROVING MEDICATION RECONCILIATION WITH STANDARDS

Order Source Misattribution: The Impact on CPOE Metrics

What Will Stage I Mean for Consumers and Purchasers

COLLABORATING FOR VALUE. A Winning Strategy for Health Plans and Providers in a Shared Risk Environment

HIMSS Davies Award Enterprise Application. --- Cover Page --- IT Projects and Operations Consultant Submitter s Address: and whenever possible

The Process Innovation Center at CHOP: An Inside View

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

Coastal Medical, Inc.

Issue Brief. EHR-Based Care Coordination Performance Measures in Ambulatory Care

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

HIMSS Nursing Informatics Task Force Call. February 23, 2015

May 6, Dear Dr. Blumenthal:

Adopting a Care Coordination Strategy

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Summary of Key Health Information Technology Provisions June 1, 2010

Health Current: Roadmap Practice Transformation using Information & Data

The National Association of Clinical Nurse Specialists (NACNS)

Simplifying and Standardizing Clinical Documentation to Generate Big Data. Jane Englebright, PhD, RN, CENP, FAAN May 2017

HIMSS Submission Leveraging HIT, Improving Quality & Safety

Disclaimer This webinar may be recorded. This webinar presents a sampling of best practices and overviews, generalities, and some laws.

Value of HIT. Pat Wise VP, Health Information Systems HIMSS North America June 21, 2017

Text-based Document. Advancing Nursing Informatics to Improve Healthcare Quality and Outcomes. Authors Sensmeier, Joyce E.

Best Practices Contracting for Health IT Supporting Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Early Findings

HHS to Delay Stage 2 of Meaningful Use. A. The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act

A McKesson Perspective: ICD-10-CM/PCS

Overview of Meaningful Use Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

The T.I.G.E.R. Initiative

Chapter 11. Expanding Roles and Functions of the Health Information Management and Health Informatics Professional

Accountable Care: Clinical Integration is the Foundation

Frequently Asked Questions. Inofile FAQs

The Transition to Version 5010 and ICD-10

Health Management Information Systems

Total Cost of Care Technical Appendix April 2015

Eligible Professional Core Measure Frequently Asked Questions

Moving MACRA-MIPS Forward: Role by Role

Compliance Advisory 3 A Challenge for the Electronic Health Record s of Academic Institutions : Purpose Background

Meaningful Use: A Brief Overview for Society of Health Systems

Comprehensive Primary Care: Our Success Story

UPMC Passavant POLICY MANUAL

5D QAPI from an Operational Approach. Christine M. Osterberg RN BSN Senior Nursing Consultant Pathway Health Pathway Health 2013

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

Decision Support Project Team. Fall 2010

Mutual enhancement of diverse terminologies

September 2, Dear Administrator Tavenner:

IMPROVING TRANSITIONS OF CARE IN POPULATION HEALTH

BCBSM Physician Group Incentive Program

ACADEMIC GROUP PRACTICE AND THE LEADERSHIP OF APRN S

Re: CMS Medication Therapy Management Program Improvements

Russell B Leftwich, MD

Therapies (e.g., physical, occupational and speech) Medical social worker (MSW) 3328ALL0118-F 1

s n a p s h o t The State of Health Information Technology in California: Use Among Hospitals and Long Term Care Facilities

Patient Driven Payment Model (PDPM) and the MDS: A Total Evolution of the SNF Payment Model

Session 10: Integrating Data and Analytics into Provider Workflows Improves ACO Quality and Financial Performance

Quality Data Model December 2012

Medicaid Hospital Incentive Payments Calculations

Transcription:

HIMSS 2011 Implementation of Standardized Terminologies Survey Results The current healthcare climate, with rising costs and decreased reimbursement, necessitates fiscal responsibility. Elements of the 2010 Health Care Reform Act legislation tie patient safety and quality outcome measures to reimbursement. The health care literature is replete with examples of the need to demonstrate and measure health care safety and quality. With an increased focus on improving health care safety and quality, the use of standardized terminologies generates data needed to continuously improve practice (1). Use of a terminology supports the capability for retrievable of consistent data that can be shared across clinical providers, clinical settings and healthcare specialties. The data is used to assess clinical processes and help quantify safety and quality outcomes. Deploying standardized terminologies for use across the continuum of care is an essential strategy to perform comparable research which can have a positive effect on the quality of patient care. Goal The goal of this survey was to obtain quantifiable data on the implementation of nursing terminologies in various care settings and by various stakeholders. The survey was developed by the HIMSS Nursing Informatics Community Terminology Resources Workgroup: Diane K. Struck, BSN, MS, Workgroup Chair, Christine Corkins, RN, PMP, Catherine Ivory, RNC OB, RN BC, MSN, Cynthia B. Lundberg, RN, BSN and Christel Anderson, HIMSS Director of Clinical Informatics staff liaison. Methodology To gain a better understanding on the implementation of nursing terminologies in various care settings and by nursing professionals, the HIMSS Nursing Informatics Community conducted a Web based survey. Nursing professionals were issued a series of electronic invitations in January and February, 2011. A total of 333 usable responses were received to this survey. Respondents The majority of the 333 nurse professionals who participated in this survey worked in a hospital setting 60% worked at a hospital/multi hospital system/integrated delivery care setting with 40% either seeking or have obtained Magnet status. Approximately 9% of survey respondents worked within an ambulatory care facility, home health care organization or within community and public health. The remainder of survey respondents worked within an academic institution (15%); consulting firm (5%); vendor (4%); or a federal, state, or local government office (2%).

Is There a Terminology in Place? Of the 333 useable responses, 31% (102 respondents) indentified that they currently had a standardized terminology in place. An overwhelming majority 69% (231 respondents) identified that they either did not have a terminology in place or did not know. Q: Do you currently have a nursing terminology implemented within your health information system? Terminologies Currently in Use Of the 102 respondents, 77% identified they currently have one of the following American Nursing Association recognized nursing terminology within their health system: ABC Codes Clinical Care Classification (CCC) International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP ) Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC ) NANDA International Nursing Diagnoses, Definitions, and Classification Nursing Interventions Classification System (NIC) Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS) Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) PeriOperative Nursing Data Set (PNDS) SNOMED CT The Omaha System Other Interestingly, 23% of the respondents indentified they did not know what type of terminology was in place within their health care organization. The following may explain this result: demographics of respondents including the length of formal education, years of clinical practice, and level of experience. Additionally, the terminology is not visible at the point of care, but

rather a part of the workflow; it is not readily apparent in selection, implementation and build of the system. The remaining 12% of respondents identified they had a combination of terminologies in place. Q: Which terminology/terminologies are currently in use within your organization? Who Uses the Terminology? The majority of respondents (69%) identified that the terminology is most widely used by clinical nurses. Interestingly, several respondents (19%) identified that the terminology was in use enterprise wide by multiple professionals including: Ancillary Services (i.e. Dietary/Nutrition, Lab, OT, PT, Pharmacy, Radiology, and Respiratory Therapy), Clinical Nurses, Medical Technicians / Aides, Physicians and other Care Providers (i.e. Case Management, NPs, PAs, CRNAs, and Social Workers). An assumption can be made that other health care domains may see terminologies approved for use by nursing are intended only for nurses. Rather these terminologies are not unique and proprietary to nursing but are patient centric. As an illustration: pain can be documented by a Physical Therapist, Physician or by a Nurse and therefore only one representation of the concept of pain is required within the standardized terminology that can be used by all clinicians to document that the patient is experiencing pain. In What System is the Terminology Implemented? Respondents were asked to identify if a nursing terminology was implemented in Ancillary, Special Care, Enterprise Wide, or Facility Wide systems. The majority of respondents (44%) identified there was a nursing terminology implemented enterprise wide, as defined to be across multiple facilities/hospitals. The second highest rated area (34%) was facility wide and defined to be across several units in one facility.

Drivers for Adoption While standardized terminologies are used by many disciplines, including nursing, the nursing profession may have the most to gain by implementing standard terminologies. The chart below summarizes survey responses related to key drivers for implementing standardized terminologies. Many inpatient hospital complications such as falls and pressure ulcers have been described as nurse sensitive quality measures. In 2007, Medicare stopped paying for the never events (2). By using standardized terminologies, nurses can begin to correlate nursing interventions with corresponding patient problems and their expected outcomes to potentially validate or refute the relationship of nursing care to patient. Most health systems today are designed to capture data for which a charge may be attached (for example, through ICD codes). Nursing care is reimbursed as part of the daily room or bed charge and is essentially invisible. By accurately and consistently capturing nursing interventions, the work of nursing may be measured and correlated with outcomes. Q: Please identify the drivers for adoption of nursing terminology/terminologies within your organization. Barriers to Implementation The chart below describes respondents perceived barriers to implementing standard terminologies. Interestingly, many respondents indicated that they were unaware standard terminology options existed, or their vendor did not offer a standardized terminology for their implementation. With federal incentive dollars tied to meaningful use of health care information

technology and meaningful use criteria very focused on interoperability and quality data retrieval, a shift in consumer awareness of and vendor support for the use of standard terminologies should be expected. Adoption of use is a barrier to implementation in that the standardized terminologies do not represent a natural language in the point of care description. Q: What are the barriers to successfully implementing nursing terminologies in your organization today? Conclusion The most significant finding was that less than one third (31%) of those surveyed used a nursing terminology in their health system. Survey results indicate a real need to increase the knowledge of standardized terminology within the nursing workforce. Increasing the knowledge can be accomplished through education, training and workforce development. Nurse educators must incorporate standardized terminologies into the nursing curriculum in the academic setting (3). Continuing education should include terminology emphasis so that all nurses can have baseline knowledge of nursing terminology. With increased education, greater adoption of standards will occur enterprise wide. These survey results indicated that nurses surveyed understand the value of terminology with regards to nursing intervention, increasing safety, and compliance with national quality measures allowing greater adherence to standards of care. Future Vision Nursing terminology is essential in Electronic Health Records (EHRs). The previous National Coordinator for Health IT, David Blumenthal stated that EHRs will improve caregivers decisions and patients outcomes (4). The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) authorized incentive payments when providers use EHRs to achieve specified improvements in care delivery (4). The key for a successful EHR implementation is for nurse leaders to become engaged in roles that focus on major HIT adoption including meaningful use,

for example by becoming involved in the Federal Health Information Technology Standards Committee. Having a nursing voice at the federal level will help educate members of various committees on the value that nurses bring to patient care outcomes. On the local level, involvement from the whole health care team, especially the entire senior leadership team is necessary to support adoption. As the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Institutes of Medicine reported in October 2010, there is an opportunity to transform the United States health care system and nurses can and should play a fundamental role in this transformation (5). Utilizing better data collection and instituting standardized terminologies will have improved health outcomes and patient safety for all. References: 1. Keenan, G., Tschannen D., and Wesley M. Standardized Nursing Terminologies Can Transform Practice. Journal of Nursing Administration 38, 3, 103 106. 2. Department of Health and Human Services. State Medicaid Director. Retrieved from http://www.cms.gov/smdl/downloads/smd073108.pdf 3. Burkhart, L., Sommer S. (2007). Integrating Preventive Care and Nursing Standardized Terminologies in Nursing Education: A Case Study. Journal of Professional Nursing 23, 4, 208 213. 4. Blumenthal D., Tavenner M. The Meaningful Use Regulation for Electronic Health Records. The New England Journal of Medicine; http://healthpolicyandreform.nejm.org/?p=3732 5. Institute of Medicine. The Future of Nursing; Leading Change Advancing Health October 2010 p. 1 8. How to Cite This Report Individuals are encouraged to cite this report and any accompanying graphics in printed matter, publications, or any other medium, as long as the information is attributed to the HIMSS 2011 Implementation of Standardized Terminologies Survey Results. For More Information For more information on this initiative, visit the HIMSS Nursing Informatics Toolbox; explore the HIMSS Nursing Informatics Community website or contact us. ##### About HIMSS HIMSS is a cause based, not for profit organization exclusively focused on providing global leadership for the optimal use of information technology (IT) and management systems for the betterment of healthcare. Founded 50 years ago, HIMSS and its related organizations have offices in Chicago, Washington, DC, Brussels, Singapore, Leipzig, and other locations across the United States. HIMSS represents more than 35,000 individual members, of which more than two thirds work in healthcare provider, governmental and not for profit organizations. HIMSS also includes over 520 corporate members and more than 120 not for profit organizations that share

our mission of transforming healthcare through the effective use of information technology and management systems. HIMSS frames and leads healthcare practices and public policy through its content expertise, professional development, and research initiatives designed to promote information and management systems contributions to improving the quality, safety, access, and cost effectiveness of patient care. To learn more about HIMSS and to find out how to join us and our members in advancing our cause, please visit our website at www.himss.org