Hospital Discharge Data, 2005 From The University of Memphis Methodist Le Bonheur Center for Healthcare Economics

Similar documents
Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations in Tennessee, Final Report. May 2006

Issue Brief. Non-urgent Emergency Department Use in Shelby County, Tennessee, May August 2012

Issue Brief From The University of Memphis Methodist Le Bonheur Center for Healthcare Economics

Chapter VII. Health Data Warehouse

AHRQ Quality Indicators. Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission October 21, 2005 Marybeth Farquhar, AHRQ

Health Indicators. for the Dallas/Fort Worth Combined Metropolitan Statistical Area Brad Walsh and Sue Pickens Owens

The Unmet Demand for Primary Care in Tennessee: The Benefits of Fully Utilizing Nurse Practitioners

HIDD 101 HOSPITAL INPATIENT AND DISCHARGE DATA IN NEW MEXICO

Center for State Health Policy

Nebraska Final Report for. State-based Cardiovascular Disease Surveillance Data Pilot Project

Hospital Utilization by the Uninsured and Other Vulnerable Populations in New Jersey

Total Cost of Care Technical Appendix April 2015

2015 Hospital Inpatient Discharge Data Annual Report

Using Secondary Datasets for Research. Learning Objectives. What Do We Mean By Secondary Data?

WilCo Wellness Alliance. Summit Presentation. Cara Woodard Account Manager. April 25, 2017

Outcomes for Iowa Medicaid Chronic Condition Health Home Program Enrollees. Policy Report. SFYs February 2017

MEDICARE ENROLLMENT, HEALTH STATUS, SERVICE USE AND PAYMENT DATA FOR AMERICAN INDIANS & ALASKA NATIVES

Carolinas Collaborative Data Dictionary

LIVINGSTON COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE. Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency, 2017

CHEMUNG COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE. Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency, 2017

MONROE COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE. Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency, 2017

AVAILABLE TOOLS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH CORE DATA FUNCTIONS

ONTARIO COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE. Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency, 2017

Chronic Disease Surveillance and Office of Surveillance, Evaluation, and Research

STEUBEN COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE. Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency, 2017

Ambulatory-care-sensitive admission rates: A key metric in evaluating health plan medicalmanagement effectiveness

Evaluation of Health Care Homes:

HEDIS Ad-Hoc Public Comment: Table of Contents

Admissions and Readmissions Related to Adverse Events, NMCPHC-EDC-TR

East Central Florida Status Report on Nursing Supply and Demand July 2016

STEUBEN COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE

Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations among Dual Eligible Beneficiaries in Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services Waivers

Selected Measures United States, 2011

Survey of Nurses 2015

STATISTICAL BRIEF #9. Hospitalizations among Males, Highlights. Introduction. Findings. June 2006

June 25, Shamis Mohamoud, David Idala, Parker James, Laura Humber. AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting

Balanced Scorecards & Population Health

CER Module ACCESS TO CARE January 14, AM 12:30 PM

Appendix A Registered Nurse Nonresponse Analyses and Sample Weighting

2017 SPECIALTY REPORT ANNUAL REPORT

Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings

2016 Survey of Michigan Nurses

Oregon Health Authority Key Performance Measures Biennium

Appendix #4. 3M Clinical Risk Groups (CRGs) for Classification of Chronically Ill Children and Adults

West Central Florida Status Report on Nursing Supply and Demand July 2016

Predicting Transitions in the Nursing Workforce: Professional Transitions from LPN to RN

Prepared for North Gunther Hospital Medicare ID August 06, 2012

Integrating Policy and Physiology Towards Optimal Hospital Discharge We Can Do It! Toni Miles, M.D., Ph.D. June 11, 2015

2016 Hospital Inpatient Discharge Data Annual Report

COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT HINDS, RANKIN, MADISON COUNTIES STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

Executive Summary MEDICARE FEE-FOR-SERVICE (FFS) HOSPITAL READMISSIONS: QUARTER 4 (Q4) 2012 Q STATE OF CALIFORNIA

2012 Community Health Needs Assessment

Statistical Analysis Plan

Jennifer A. Meddings, MD, MSc

Community Health Improvement Plan

Policy Brief. rhrc.umn.edu. June 2013

AHRQ Quality Indicators Program Update OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Expert Group May 22, 2014

Northeast Florida Status Report on Nursing Supply and Demand July 2016

Physician Workforce Fact Sheet 2016

The Number of People With Chronic Conditions Is Rapidly Increasing

DELAWARE FACTBOOK EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Preliminary Evaluation Findings NJHI-Expecting Success in Cardiac Care

Medicare Advantage PPO participation Termination - Practice Name (Tax ID #: <TaxID>)

Demographic Profile of the Active-Duty Warrant Officer Corps September 2008 Snapshot

ICD-10 Scenario Based Testing Analysis, Planning and Testing Driven by a Reference Implementation Model

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

The Role of Analytics in the Development of a Successful Readmissions Program

Hospital Strength INDEX Methodology

Suicide Among Veterans and Other Americans Office of Suicide Prevention

MERMAID SERIES: SECONDARY DATA ANALYSIS: TIPS AND TRICKS

(For care delivered in 2008)

Improving Monitoring and Evaluation of Environmental Public Health in Maryland

District of Columbia Medicaid Specialty Hospital Project Frequently Asked Questions

Definitions/Glossary of Terms

Using Quality Improvement to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Medicaid Managed Care: Lessons from Oregon

Basic Concepts of Data Analysis for Community Health Assessment Module 5: Data Available to Public Health Professionals

Health Economics Program

Facility Survey of Providers of ESRD Therapy. Number of Dialysis and Transplant Units 1989 and Number of Units ,660 2,421 1,669

METHODOLOGY FOR INDICATOR SELECTION AND EVALUATION

An Analysis of Medicaid Costs for Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury While Residing in Maryland Nursing Facilities

Comparison of Care in Hospital Outpatient Departments and Physician Offices

School of Public Health University at Albany, State University of New York

District of Columbia Medicaid Specialty Hospital Payment Method Frequently Asked Questions

The Memphis Model: CHN as Community Investment

Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment Issues March 28 30, 2012 Robert A. Pelaia, JD, CPC

Updated validation of AHRQ Prevention Quality Indicators in the USA

Using the New Home Health Agency (HHA) PEPPER to Support Auditing and Monitoring Efforts

March 6, 2016 Cambridge, MA. Health Equity. Amy Reid, MPH

Nielsen ICD-9. Healthcare Data

Healthcare- Associated Infections in North Carolina

The Drive Towards Value Based Care

POSITION DESCRIPTION

Health and Long-Term Care Use Patterns for Ohio s Dual Eligible Population Experiencing Chronic Disability

Addressing Low Health Literacy to Achieve Racial and Ethnic Health Equity

Bianca K. Frogner, PhD Assistant Professor The George Washington University. Joanne Spetz, PhD Professor University of California, San Francisco

Mental Health Services Provided in Specialty Mental Health Organizations, 2004

Decrease in Hospital Uncompensated Care in Michigan, 2015

Coding Companion for Primary Care. A comprehensive illustrated guide to coding and reimbursement

IN EFFORTS to control costs, many. Pediatric Length of Stay Guidelines and Routine Practice. The Case of Milliman and Robertson ARTICLE

NOTE: New Hampshire rules, to

Transcription:

Hospital Discharge Data, 2005 From The University of Memphis Methodist Le Bonheur Center for Healthcare Economics August 22, 2008 Potentially Avoidable Pediatric Hospitalizations in Tennessee, 2005 Cyril F. Chang, Ph.D., Henry G. Herrod, MD, and Stephanie S. Steinberg, MBA and MHA * The Concept of a Potentially Avoidable Pediatric Hospitalization Potentially avoidable pediatric hospitalizations are those inpatient cases that can be prevented by effective primary care delivered earlier to the hospitalized children in the community setting. 1 These hospitalizations can now be identified using an analytical tool developed and released by the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) based on a set of clinically verified inpatient diagnostic codes. 2 This Issue Brief uses this new tool called The Pediatric Quality Indicators (PDIs) 3 and applies it to Tennessee pediatric inpatient discharge records for 2005 to produce the data analyzed in this report. The development of the analytical tools for identifying potentially avoidable hospitalizations (PAHs) for the pediatric population followed closely the evolution and progress of the AHRQ Quality Indicators Project. In the initial efforts to identify these indicators, investigators at Stanford University and the University of California who worked under a contract with AHRQ concluded that quality care inside the hospital might be reflected by a set of measures called the Prevention Quality Indicators. These could be used with hospital inpatient discharge data to identify hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) for which expected optimal outpatient care delivered earlier should have prevented the need for an inpatient admission at a later time. In the first release of the Prevention Quality Indicators in 2004, a set of sixteen (16) inpatient diagnoses and their ICD-9 codes were introduced for identifying PAHs and they included diagnoses for both adult and pediatric populations. 4 In 2006, AHRQ reported its first Pediatric Quality Indicators (PDIs) for measuring quality care for hospitalized pediatric patients. These are the first set of measures developed by AHRQ exclusively for children and have just begun to be used by researchers and state health analysts in the evaluation of the quality and adequacy of primary care in a state or a region of a state and in assessing for possible disparities between groups using a statewide discharge dataset. * Author Information: Cyril F. Chang, Ph.D., is a Professor of Economics and the Director of Methodist Le Bonheur Center for Healthcare Economics at the University of Memphis. Henry G. Herrod, MD, is a Professor of Pediatrics at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center and a Senior Research Fellow of the Urban Child Institute, Memphis, Tennessee. Stephanie S. Steinberg, MBA and MHA, is a doctoral candidate in the Economics Department, the University of Memphis. Page 1

Data and Methods Data source. Tennessee law (Tennessee Code Annotated (TCA), Section 68-1-108) requires that every licensed hospital report all claims data found on the UB-92 Form to the Planning and Assessment of the Department of Health. Since 1997, the Division of Health Statistics in the Office of Policy Planning and Assessment of the Tennessee Department of Health has established a data system, the Hospital Discharge Planning System (HDDS), to collect, compile and disseminate hospital discharge data annually. 5 The data presented in this report contain excerpts from the 2005 HDDS dataset that covers the data period from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005. Study Population. The study population is restricted to pediatric patients defined as those under 18 years of age, not in Major Diagnostic Category (MDC) 14 (Pregnancy, Childbirth and the Puerperium), and not in an adult Diagnosis Related Group (DRG). They must be discharged from a non-federal short-stay Tennessee hospital such as a general medical and surgical hospital, women s or OB/GYN hospital, or a pediatric hospital. 6 Excluded are patients from long-term, psychiatric, rehabilitation, and other specialty hospitals. Also excluded, following the guidelines for using the AHRQ Pediatric Quality Indicators, are patients who were transferred from another institution and patients discharges against medical advice. Identification of Area-Level PDIs. For this report, we used the revised AHRQ definitions for PDIs as reported in the March 2007 revision of the AHRQ Publication, Measures of Pediatric Health Care Quality Based on Hospital Administrative Data, The Pediatric Quality Indicators, Ver. 3.1. 3 This publication, together with its companion publication, AHRQ Quality Indicators Prevention Quality Indicators: Technical Specifications 3.2, 7 provides a comprehensive review of the origins, background, and technical specifications of the AHRQ Quality Indicators Project. AHRQ released two sets of PDIs in the March 2007 revision: Provider-Level Indicators and Area-Level Indicators. The former are for measuring the quality of pediatric care received in a hospital while the latter identify potentially avoidable hospitalizations thereby allowing policy makers to target specific population groups that appear to be developing more severe diseases requiring hospitalization. Higher than anticipated rates of the Area-Level PDI cases may reflect poor access to care, barriers to timely care, barriers to adherence to medical advice, cultural influences that preclude seeking early treatment, or higher prevalence of poor health behaviors. Interventions may address any of these factors. The results for this Issue Brief are reported based upon the Area-Level PDIs listed below. PDI Number Description 14 Asthma Admission Rate 15 Diabetes Short-term Complication Rate 16 Gastroenteritis Admission Rate 17 Perforated Appendix Admission Rate 18 Urinary Tract Infection Admission Rate Results As shown in Table 1, 6,725 pediatric hospitalizations fit the definition of one of the five PDIs and were thus identified as potentially avoidable pediatric hospitalizations Page 2

(PAPHs). This represents about 5.1% of the 131,023 of total hospitalizations of children under the age of 18 in Tennessee. Table 1 - Potentially Avoidable Pediatric Hospitalizations in Tennessee and U.S., 2005 Discharges Rate per 100,000 TN Pediatric Population 2 Rate per 100,000 US Pediatric Population 1 PDI # Pediatric Quality Indicators (PDI) 14 Asthma Admission Rate 3 1,927 150.2 180.9 15 Diabetes Short-Term Complication Admission Rate 4 505 52.3 29.0 16 Gastroenteritis Admission Rate 5 2,923 203.9 182.5 17 Perforated Appendix Admission Rate 6 370 36.0 31.2 18 Urinary Tract Infection Admission Rate 7 1,000 69.8 52.9 6,725 Notes: 1 Source: The HCUP Kids' Inpatient Database, 2003; Rates are per 100,000 except for perforated appendix (per 100 discharges for appendicitis) (AHRQ Quality Indicators, http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov) 2 Source of Tennessee Population: U.S. Census Bureau Estimate - Tennessee (2005) by Age (www.census.gov, downloaded 6/27/08) 3 Denominator = TN population age 2-17 years (2005) 4 Denominator = TN population age 6-17 years (2005) 5 Denominator = TN population age 3 months - 17 years (2005) 6 Denominator = All non-maternal discharges for appendicitis (ICD-9 codes: 5400, 5401, 5409 and 541) 7 Denominator = TN population age 2-17 years (2005) Among the five diagnostic categories, gastroenteritis was the leading PDI accounting for 43.5% of the state total of PAPHs in 2005. This was followed by asthma (28.7% of total) and urinary tract infection (14.9% of total). Diabetes short-term complication (7.5% of total) and perforated appendix (5.5% of total) were the two least common PDIs in 2005. Compared to the U.S., Tennessee experienced a higher rate of PAPHs per 100,000 children under 18 years of age in four of the five PDIs with asthma as the only exception. For example, Tennessee exceeded the U.S. by a large margin in the rates of Diabetes Short-Term Complication (52.3 vs. 29.0 per 100,000 children in the general population), Gastroenteritis (203.9 vs. 182.5 per 100,000 children in the general population), and Urinary Track Infection (69.8 vs. 52.9 per 100,000 children in the general population). In terms of gender distribution shown in Table 2, a practically identical proportion of male and female PAPH discharges were reported for 2005, with boys and girls reporting 5.2% and 5.1% of their respective total discharges as PAPHs. T able 2 - Potentially Avoidable Pediatric Hospitalizations by Gender, 2005 Gender All Pediatric Discharges Pediatric PAHs % PAHs of Female 64,621 3,274 5.1% Male 66,378 3,451 5.2% U nknown 24 0 0.0% 131,023 6,725 5.1% Table 3 summarizes PAPHs by race. In 2005, Black and White children in Tennessee reported 27,378 and 88,565 inpatient hospitalizations, respectively, for all conditions. Black pediatric patients appeared to have a slightly higher rate of PAPHs than White patients (6.0% vs. 5.2%), while Hispanics and other small racial groups, such Page 3

as Asians, Native Americans and Pacific Islanders, exhibited much lower rates than either the White or Black population subgroup. T able 3 - Potentially Avoidable Pediatric Hospitalizations by Race, 2005 Race All Pediatric Discharges Pediatric PAHs % PAHs of W hite 88,565 4,597 5.2% Black 27,378 1,635 6.0% H ispanic 4,905 209 4.3% O ther 4,229 142 3.4% U nknown 5,946 142 2.4% 131,023 6,725 5.1% Table 4 reports total pediatric discharges for all conditions by major payer group and corresponding PAPHs. For children, Medicare discharges were the smallest (141 or less than 1% of 131,023 of total discharges for all conditions), with TennCare (63,809 or 48.7% of total) and Commercial/Blue Cross and Blue Shield (55,117 or 42.1% of total) as the two highest payer groups. The Uninsured/Self Pay category (3,446 or 2.6% of total) includes primarily patients who reported no insurance coverage at the time of admission. Other payer groups (i.e., Champus/Military and Workers Compensation) accounted for 8,510 or 6.5% of pediatric discharges across all conditions. A comparison of the rates of PAPHs as a percentage of total discharges across the payer groups indicates that 1.4% of all Medicare discharges were PAPHs, followed by TennCare (5.4%), Commercial/Blue Cross and Blue Shield (4.8%) and Self Insured/Self Pay (5.0%). The Other category reported the lowest rate of PAPHs at 5.0%. T able 4 - Potentially Avoidable Pediatric Hospitalizations by Payer, 2005 Payer All Pediatric Discharges Pediatric PAHs % PAHs of Medicare 141 2 1.4% TennCare 63,809 3,473 5.4% Com mercial & BC/BS 55,117 2,653 4.8% Self Insured/Self Pay 3,446 173 5.0% O ther 8,510 424 5.0% 131, 023 6,725 5.1% Table 5 reports total costs by PDI for 2005. costs were not available directly from the Tennessee Discharge Database. We estimated them from total dollar amounts of discharges reported by the Discharge Database and deflate them by a costto-charge ratio calculated for each hospital based on the cost and discharge data reported in the 2005 edition of the Tennessee Joint Annual Report of Hospitals. costs for Asthma ($5,163,281) were the highest, followed by Gastroenteritis ($4,584,433), Perforated Appendices ($3,167,600), Urinary Tract Infection ($2,601,700), and Diabetes Short-Term Complication ($2,081,736). In terms of cost per discharge, Perforated Appendices hospitalizations had the highest mean cost ($8,561 per discharge), followed by Diabetes Short-Term Complication ($4,122), Asthma ($2,679), Urinary Tract Infection ($2,602), and Gastroenteritis ($1,568). Page 4

Table 5 - and Mean Costs of Potentially Avoidable Pediatric Hospitalizations, 2005 PDI # Pediatric Quality Indicators (PDI) Discharges Costs Mean Cost/Case 14 Asthma Admission Rate 1,927 $5,163,281 $2,679 15 Diabetes Short-Term Complication Admission Rate 505 $2,081,736 $4,122 16 Gastroenteritis Admission Rate 2,923 $4,584,433 $1,568 17 Perforated Appendix Admission Rate 370 $3,167,600 $8,561 18 Urinary Tract Infection Admission Rate 1,000 $2,601,700 $2,602 6,725 $17,598,750 $2,617 Note: costs were calculated from total dollars of discharges recorded in the Tennesse Discharge Database and deflated by a cost-todischarge ratio calculated for each hospital based on the cost and discharge data from the 2005 edition of Tennessee Joint Annual Report of Hospitals. Discussion This Issue Brief presents data describing patterns of pediatric hospitalizations in Tennessee for Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions (ACSCs) for which effective primary care should reduce the need for later hospitalization. It also demonstrates how the new AHRQ definitions of Pediatric Quality Indicators can be used in conjunction with state-level hospital discharge data to produce useful health system information regarding the efficient allocation of health care resources. The major findings for 2005 are: In 2005, a total 6,725 pediatric hospitalizations (5.1% of pediatric hospitalizations for all conditions) were PAPHs. Children in Tennessee had higher rates of PAPHs than those experienced by the children in the United States as a whole in four of the five pediatric ACSCs. Tennessee s PAPH rates were particularly high for Diabetes Short-Term Complication, a chronic condition that has both long-run and short-run consequences both financially and clinically for children who suffer from diabetes. There was no discernable difference in the rate for PAPHs between boys and girls, but Black children appeared to have higher rates than White children and children of other races. Among the different third-party payers, TennCare or Tennessee s managed care Medicaid program had a slightly higher PAPH rate in 2005 than other three major payer categories, which had rates between 4.8% and 5.0%. Medicare had a negligibly small proportion of total hospitalizations for all conditions in Tennessee as well as the lowest PAPH rate. The 6,725 of PAPH discharges cost hospitals a total of $17.6 million in 2005. The patient-level hospital discharge data reported in this Issue Brief contains a wide range of data variables including primary and secondary diagnoses, utilization of services, comorbidity conditions, procedures performed, and hospital charges. Regular analysis and reporting using innovative tools such as the AHRQ s Pediatric Quality Indicators used in this report can improve the efficiency and productivity of the health delivery system by contributing timely and vital information to public health surveillance and evaluation. Page 5

References: 1 Herrod, HG and Chang, CF. Potentially avoidable pediatric hospitalizations as defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: What do they tell us about disparities in child health? Clinical Pediatrics 2008;47(2):128-136. 2 Pediatric Quality Indicators Overview. AHRQ Quality Indicators. February 2006. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/pdi_overview.htm. 3 Measures of Pediatric Health Care Quality Based on Hospital Administrative Data: The Pediatric Quality Indicators, Version 3.1, March 2007. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/pdi_download.htm. 4 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ Quality Indicators-Guide to Prevention Quality Indicators: Hospital Admission for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions. Revision 4 ed. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004. 5 Tennessee Department of Health. Tennessee Hospital Discharge Data System. Nashville, Tennessee: Tennessee Department of Health, Health Statistics and Research, November 2002. Nashville, Tennessee. http://www2.state.tn.us/health/statistics/pdffiles/ HDDS.pdf. 6 NCHS Definitions Hospital. National Center for Health Statistics. Washington, D.C. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/datawh/nchsdefs/hospital.htm 7 Pediatric Quality Indicators Technical Specifications, Ver 3.2, March 2008, March 2008. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/pdi_download.htm. * * * Suggested Citation: Chang CF, Herrod HG and Steinberg SS. Potentially Avoidable Pediatric Hospitalizations in Tennessee, 2005. Memphis, TN: Methodist LeBonheur Center for Healthcare Economics, the University of Memphis, August 22, 2008. For more information about this report and other research reports, visit the Web site http://healthecon.memphis.edu/ or contact: Dr. Cyril F. Chang Professor of Economics and Director Methodist LeBonheur Center for Healthcare Economics Fogelman College of Business and Economics The University of Memphis Memphis, Tennessee 38152 Phone: 901-678-3565 Fax: 901-678-2685 E-mail: cchang@memphis.edu Page 6