Table 1: MIPS Exemptions. Exemption Individual Determination Group Determination Treatment under MIPS Already Finalized EXEMPTIONS Low-Volume

Similar documents
Virtual Group Participation Overview Fact Sheet

MACRA Quality Payment Program

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM YEAR 2 CY 2018 PROPOSED RULE Improvement Activities Component Reporting Requirements. No change.

The Quality Payment Program: Your Questions Answered

Quality Payment Program Year 2: 2018 MIPS Participation. An Introductory Guide for CRNAs in 2018

March 28, Dear Dr. Yong:

The MIPS Survival Guide

The Healthcare Roundtable

2017 Transition Year Flexibility Improvement Activities Category Options

Quality Payment Program Final Rule Year 2: What s Coming in the New Year!

MACRA Frequently Asked Questions

Quality Payment Program MIPS. Advanced APMs. Quality Payment Program

MACRA The shift to Value Based Care and Payment. Michael Munger, M.D., FAAFP

Overview of Quality Payment Program

MACRA and the Quality Payment Program. Frequently Asked Questions Edition

MACRA Implementation: A Review of the Quality Payment Program

Submitted electronically:

Steps toward Sustainability with the second year of the Quality Payment Program

2017/2018. KPN Health, Inc. Quality Payment Program Solutions Guide. KPN Health, Inc. A CMS Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) KPN Health, Inc.

CMS Quality Payment Program: Performance and Reporting Requirements

IMPLICATIONS OF THE 2018 FINAL RULE FOR SOLO PRACTITIONERS AND SMALL GROUP PRACTICES

MIPS Program: 2018 Advancing Care Information Category

MIPS Advancing Care Information: Tips, Tools and Support Q&A from Live Webinar March 29, 2017

Michelle Brunsen & Sandy Swallow May 25, , Telligen, Inc.

Strategic Implications & Conclusion

Maximizing Your Potential Under MIPS Oregon MACRA Playbook Conference

Denise Hudson, NR-CMA Health Informatics Specialist Health Services Advisory Group (HSAG) August 10, 2018

WELCOME. Kate Gainer, PharmD Executive Vice President and CEO Iowa Pharmacy Association

The Quality Payment Program: Overview & Roles and Responsibilities

MACRA Quality Payment Program

MIPS Checkpoint. Beth Hickerson Quality Improvement Advisor. PHA Lunch and Learn May 19, Value Driven. Health Care. Solutions.

Medicare Physician Payment Reform

Decoding the QPP Year 2 Quality Measure Benchmarks and Deciles to Maximize Performance

MIPS (Merit-based Incentive Payment System) Clinical Practice Improvement Activities

Statement for the Record. American College of Physicians. U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATION & ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT MODEL SUMMIT

Population Health and the Accelerating Leap to Outcomes-Based Reimbursement. Craig J. Wilson

MACRA Fall into Place. By Stephanie Cecchini, CPC, CEMC, CHISP, AAPC Fellow, AAPC MACRA Prof

The Quality Payment Program Overview Fact Sheet

Improvement Activities: What You Have To Do

The Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Survival Guide. August 11, 2016

MACRA and MIPS. How Medicare Meaningful Use and PQRS are Changing

Quality Payment Program and Alternative Payment Models. Brian R. Bourbeau, MBA COA Administrators Network April 11, 2018

Critical Access Hospitals

2017 Transition Year Flexibility Advancing Care Information (ACI) Category Options

MACRA, MIPS, QPP, and APMs.

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

SVS QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES COMMITTEE (QPMC) New Member Orientation

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

22 Days til MIPS Data Submission! Get Ready!

Glossary of Acronyms for the Quality Payment Program

Take Action Now to Avoid Medicare Penalties

MIPS Tips. Question and Answer Series Jan. 24, Presented by HealthInsight and Mountain Pacific Quality Health

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

MIPS Deep Dive: 9 steps to Reporting. Sharon Phelps QPP Webinar Series Webinar 4 June 20, 2017

MIPS eligibility lookup tool (available in Spring 2018):

Medical Practice Executive Insights

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System: 2018 Performance Year

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM

MACRA WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR YOUR PRACTICE?

MIPS Tips: Q & Answer Series Feb. 28, Presented by HealthInsight and Mountain Pacific Quality Health

From Surviving to Thriving in the QPP World

Denise Hudson, NR-CMA Health Informatics Specialist Health Services Advisory Group (HSAG) April 13, 2018

December 19, Dear Acting Administrator Slavitt:

Advancing Care Information- The New Meaningful Use September 2017

Quality Payment Program October 14, 2016

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Audio Title: Revised and Clarified Place of Service (POS) Coding Instructions Audio Date: 6/3/2015 Run Time: 16:03 Minutes ICN:

Quality Measures and Federal Policy: Increasingly Important and A Work in Progress. American Health Quality Association Policy Forum Washington, D.C.

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

CHIA PRESENTATION HANDOUT

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

Agenda. Surviving the New Program Requirements and the Financial Penalties Under MIPS 9/9/2016. Steps to take to prepare for MIPS

VALUE PAYMENT: A NEW REIMBURSEMENT SYSTEM USING QUALITY AS CURRENCY

CMS Priorities, MACRA and The Quality Payment Program

2018 MEDICARE UPDATE CHOP. January 2018 Risë Marie Cleland Oplinc, Inc.

AAWC ALERT Call for Action from Physicians

Quality Payment Program

Value-Based Psychiatric Care

MIPS Collaborative: Clinical Practice Improvement Activities April 19, 2017 Francis R Colangelo, MD

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

QPP in the Real Word: How Your Peers Are Achieving Success. Monday, September 25, :00 4:30 PM ET

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

MACRA FLEXIBILITY & THE MACRA FINAL RULE. Compliance & Opportunity for Your Practice

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Moving MACRA-MIPS Forward: Role by Role

CMS Transforming Clinical Practices Initiative and. The Southern New England Practice Transformation Network (SNE PTN)

December 19, Dear Acting Administrator Slavitt:

2/24/2017. MIPS, APMS, QRUR, and CMS Data: How Do Your Physicians Compare? Auditing Quality: The Quality Payment Program

MACRA for Critical Access Hospitals. Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Webinar

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

MIPS Improvement Activities:

Division C: Increasing Choice, Access, and Quality in Health Care for Americans TITLE XV: Provisions Relating to Medicare Part A

Improvement Activities Performance Category

Washington Update. Agenda

CMS: NOW AND LATER. AUGUST 19, 2016 Ryan E. Spikes, RN BSN, CHTS-IM/PW, CHTS, PCMH

MACRA & Implications for Telemedicine. June 20, 2016

March Data Jam: Using Data to Prepare for the MACRA Quality Payment Program

Transcription:

Exemptions and Special Status Determinations under the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): A Resource Guide for Existing and Proposed Policies The following tables provide information on exemptions and special status determinations under the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). Table 1: MIPS Exemptions. Individual clinicians and groups that meet criteria for the listed exemptions are not considered MIPS eligible clinicians and are exempt from MIPS reporting and participation requirements, as well as from MIPS payment adjustments. Table 2: MIPS Special Status Determinations. Individuals and groups who meet the criteria for a special status determination are still subject to MIPS reporting and participation requirements, in addition to MIPS payment adjustments; however, they receive special reporting and/or scoring accommodations under MIPS. This guide does not provide details regarding treatment under the Advanced Alternative Payment Model track of the Quality Payment Program. Table 1: MIPS Exemptions Exemption Individual Determination Group Determination Treatment under MIPS EXEMPTIONS Low-Volume For 2017: An eligible clinician who has Medicare Part B allowed charges less than or equal to $30,000 or provides care for 100 or fewer Part B- enrolled Medicare beneficiaries. For 2018 (proposed): An eligible clinician who has Medicare Part B allowed charges less than or equal to $90,000 or provides care for 200 or fewer Part B-enrolled Medicare beneficiaries. For 2017: A group that has Medicare Part B allowed charges less than or equal to $30,000 or provides care for 100 or fewer Part B-enrolled Medicare beneficiaries. For 2018 (proposed): A group that has Medicare Part B allowed charges less than or equal to $90,000 or provides care for 200 or fewer Part B- enrolled Medicare beneficiaries. This determination would not be made at the virtual group level. Generally exempt from MIPS reporting and participation requirements, as well as from MIPS payment adjustments. For clinicians who are below the low-volume threshold but who choose to report as part of a group, they will be included in the determination of group performance and be subject to MIPS payment adjustments based on TIN performance. Same as 2017, except that, for clinicians who are below the low-volume threshold and participate as part of a virtual group, the MIPS payment adjustment would not apply. New Medicare-Enrolled MIPS Eligible Clinician (maintained): An eligible clinician who first becomes a (maintained): Not applicable. Generally exempt from MIPS reporting and participation Same as 2017, except that, for clinicians whose TINs are part of a virtual group, the MIPS

Exemption Individual Determination Group Determination Treatment under MIPS EXEMPTIONS Medicare-enrolled eligible clinician within the Provider Enrollment, Chain and Ownership System (PECOS) during the performance period for a year and had not previously submitted claims under Medicare as an individual, an entity, or a part of a physician group or under a different billing number or tax identifier. requirements, as well as from MIPS payment adjustments. For eligible clinicians who are new Medicare-enrolled MIPS eligible clinicians who are part of a group, their performance will be included in the determination of group performance, but payments for items and services furnished by such clinicians would not be subject to a MIPS payment adjustment. payment adjustment would not apply. Qualifying APM Participant (QP) (maintained): An eligible clinician determined by CMS to have met or exceeded the relevant QP payment amount or QP patient count thresholds for participation in an advanced alternative payment model (Advanced APM) specified in statute and regulation. (maintained): Not applicable. Exempt from MIPS reporting and participation requirements, as well as from MIPS payment adjustments. Additional non-mips payment policies apply. Same as 2017. Partial Qualifying APM Participant (Partial QP) (maintained): An eligible clinician determined by CMS to have met the relevant Partial QP thresholds for participation in an Advanced APM specified in statute and regulation. Such amounts show substantial participation, but not enough to achieve QP status. (maintained): Not applicable. Exempt from MIPS reporting and participation requirements, as well as from MIPS payment adjustments, unless the Partial QP chooses to report under MIPS. In that case, full reporting and participation requirements apply, as do MIPS payment adjustments. Same as 2017, including with respect to participation via a virtual group. 2

Table 2: MIPS Special Status Determinations Special Status Individual Determination Group Determination Treatment under MIPS Small Practice (maintained): An eligible (maintained): A practice clinician who furnishes items or consisting of 2 to 15 clinicians. services as part of a practice consisting of 15 or fewer clinicians, or a solo practitioner. Quality category: Exempt from assessment under the all-cause hospital readmission measure. Improvement Activities (IA) category: Subject to reduced reporting requirements, such that individuals or groups who are in a small practice only have to report one high-weighted IA or two medium-weighted IAs to receive full credit under this category. Same as 2017, plus the following: Quality category: Maintains a 3- point floor for quality measures reported that do not meet data completeness requirements. Advancing Care Information (ACI): Can qualify for a new small practice hardship exemption with an approved application. Final score: Eligible for small practice bonus of 5 points added to final score. Virtual groups: Virtual groups with fewer than 15 clinicians may qualify as a small practice. Rural Area For 2017: A clinician in a TIN with at least one practice site in a zip code designated as rural, using the most recent Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Area Health resource File data set available. For 2017: A TIN with at least one practice site in a zip code designated as rural, using the most recent Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Area Health resource File data set available. 1 For 2018 (proposed): a TIN with at least 75 percent of NPIs IA category: Subject to reduced reporting requirements, such that individuals or groups who are in a small practice only have to report one high-weighted IA or two medium-weighted IAs to receive full credit under this category. Same as 2017, except that virtual groups with at least 75 percent of their TINs designated as rural areas would also be designated as a rural area at the virtual group level. 1 This is based on clarifications included in the CY 2018 Updates to the QPP Proposed Rule. Separately, CMS notes on its website that a group qualifies for the rural designation if the practice has at least one clinician that is designated as rural. 3

For 2018 (proposed): a clinician in a TIN with at least 75 percent of NPIs billing under the TIN located in a zip code designated as rural, using the most recent HRSA resource File data set available. billing under the TIN located in a zip code designated as rural, using the most recent HRSA resource File data set available. Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) For 2017: A clinician in a TIN with at least one practice site in an area designated as a HPSA under section 332(a)(1)(A) of the public Health Service Act. For 2018 (proposed): A clinician in a TIN with at least 75 percent of NPIs billing under the TIN located in an HPSA. For 2017: A TIN with at least one practice site in an area designated as a HPSA under section 332(a)(1)(A) of the public Health Service Act. 2 For 2018 (proposed): A TIN with at least 75 percent of NPIs billing under the TIN located in an HPSA. IA category: Subject to reduced reporting requirements, such that individuals or groups who are in a small practice only have to report one high-weighted IA or two medium-weighted IAs to receive full credit under this category. Same as 2017, except that virtual groups with at least 75 percent of their TINs designated as HPSA practices would also be designated as an HPSA practice at the virtual group level. Non-Patient Facing (maintained): An individual MIPS eligible clinician that bills 100 or fewer patient facing encounters (including Medicare telehealth services) during the non-patient facing determination period. (maintained): A group where more than 75 percent of the NPIs billing under the group s TIN meet the definition of a non-patient facing individual MIPS eligible clinician during the non-patient facing determination period. IA category: Subject to reduced reporting requirements, such that individuals or groups who are in a small practice only have to report one high-weighted IA or two medium-weighted IAs to receive full credit under this category. Advancing Care Information (ACI) category: Subject to automatic reweighting of this category to zero percent, Same as 2017, except that virtual groups with at least 75 percent of the NPIs billing under the virtual group s TINs would also meet the definition of a non-patient facing individual MIPS eligible clinician during the non-patient facing determination period. 2 This is based on clarifications included in the CY 2018 Updates to the QPP Proposed Rule. Separately, CMS notes on its website that a group qualifies for the HPSA designation if the practice has at least one clinician that is designated as Health Professional Shortage Area. 4

unless a non-patient facing clinician or group chooses to report under this category. Hospital-Based For 2017: MIPS eligible clinicians who furnishes 75 percent or more of their covered professional services in sites of service identified by POS 21 (inpatient hospital), POS 22 (on-campus outpatient hospital), or emergency room (POS 23) setting based on claims for a period prior to the performance period as specified by CMS. For 2018 (proposed): Same as 2017, except that CMS proposes to also include services provided in sites of service identified by POS 19 (off-campus outpatient hospital) in the definition of hospital-based MIPS eligible clinician. (maintained): A group where 100 percent of its clinicians are determined to be hospitalbased. ACI category: Subject to automatic reweighting of this category to zero percent, unless a hospital-based MIPS eligible clinician chooses to report under this category. For a hospital-based MIPS eligible clinician who reports as part of a group, the group is not required to report any information for that individual and his/her performance will be removed from the group s numerator and denominator, unless the group reports data for such clinician. Same as 2017. Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC)-Based For 2017 onward (proposed): MIPS eligible clinicians who furnish 75% or more of their covered professional services in sites of service identified by POS 24 (ASC), based on claims for a prior period as specified by CMS. For 2017 onward (proposed): Not specified in the CY 2018 proposed QPP rule. Not applicable. Advancing Care Information: Subject to automatic reweighting of this category to zero percent, unless an ASCbased MIPS eligible clinician chooses to report under this category. CMS does not specify reporting requirements for an ASC-based clinician who reports 5

as part of a group in the CY 2018 proposed rule. Physician Assistants, Nurse Practitioners, Clinical Nurse Specialists, or Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists : MIPS eligible clinicians who are physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, or certified registered nurse anesthetists (maintained): TBD. Awaiting CMS confirmation. ACI category: Subject to automatic reweighting of this category to zero percent, unless the designated nonphysician practitioner MIPS eligible clinician chooses to report under this category. For a MIPS eligible clinician who reports as part of a group, the group is not required to report any information for that individual and his/her performance will be removed from the group s numerator and denominator, unless the group reports data for such clinician. Same as 2017. Facility-Based For 2018 (proposed): A MIPS eligible clinician who furnishes 75% or more of their covered professional services in sites of service identified by POS 21 (inpatient hospital) or POS 23 (emergency room), based on claims for a prior period as specified by CMS. For 2018 (proposed): A group in which 75 percent or more of the MIPS eligible clinician NPIs billing under the group s TIN are eligible for facility-based measurement as individuals Not applicable May elect to be assessed under facility-based measurement for the cost and quality performance categories. This option is not available for virtual groups. Virtual Group Not applicable For 2018 (proposed): A combination of two or more TINs composed of a solo practitioner or a group with 10 or fewer eligible clinicians Not applicable Subject to assessment at the virtual group level across all participating TINs for all four MIPS performance categories. 6

under the TIN that elects to (and is approved to) form a virtual group with at least one other such solo practitioner or group for a performance period for a year. The final score of a TIN/NPI combination assessed as a virtual group would be applied instead of the final score of a TIN/NPI combination assessed at the group or individual level. MIPS APM Participant (maintained): An individual clinician who is identified on the Participation List for a performance period of an APM Entity participating in a MIPS APM. (maintained): The group of eligible clinicians identified on the Participation List for a performance period of an APM Entity participating in a MIPS APM. A MIPS APM Entity group is subject to the APM Scoring Standard under MIPS, which generally: Relies on quality reporting under the MIPS APM for the quality reporting category Assigns a minimum IA score based on activities required for participation under the model (in practice thus far, this has translated to being assigned 100% of the points available under the IA category) Aggregates TIN-level (for MSSP APM entities) or NPIlevel (for all other MIPS APM entity groups) ACI reporting for all TINs/NPIs participating in an APM Entity Reweights the cost category to zero and redistributes weight across the remaining categories. A virtual group that has 15 or fewer clinicians would qualify as a small practice. Same as 2017, except: All MIPS APMs are scored in the quality category and subject to the APM Scoring Standard category weights as those that applied for MIPS APMs that were scored in the quality category in 2017. The final score of a TIN/NPI combination assessed under a MIPS APM would be applied instead of the final score of a TIN/NPI combination assessed at the virtual group level, as well as at the group or individual level. 7

For 2017, only those MIPS APMs that require reporting via the Web Interface 3 are scored in the quality category, with category weights shown in the table below. For other MIPS APMs, the quality category is reweighted to zero. Final category weights are specified by CMS for those without quality category weights. APM Scoring Standard Weights Cost 0% Quality 50% Improvement 20% Activities ACI 30% The final score of a TIN/NPI combination assessed under a MIPS APM would be applied instead of the final score of a TIN/NPI combination assessed at the group or individual level. For individual clinicians who are identified as MIPS APM participants, their participation in the MIPS APM would automatically provide one-half of the highest score under the 3 This includes MIPS APMs under the Medicare Shared Savings Program and the Next Generation ACO Model. 8

IA performance category for any other TIN (besides the MIPS APM TIN) in which they participate given their status as an APM Participant. Certified Patient- Centered Medical Home (PCMH) or Comparable Specialty Practice (maintained): A MIPS eligible clinician in a practice that is determined to be a certified or recognized PCMH or comparable specialty practice. 4 (maintained): A group in a practice that is determined to be a certified or recognized PCMH or comparable specialty practice. Receives full credit for performance under the IA category. Same as 2017, except that the certified patient-centered medical home designation may also apply to qualifying virtual groups. For 2017: To receive full credit as a certified patient-centered specialty practice requires that a TIN that is reporting includes at least one practice which is a certified patient-centered specialty practice. For 2017: To receive full credit as a certified patient-centered specialty practice requires that a TIN that is reporting includes at least one practice which is a certified patient-centered specialty practice. For 2018 (proposed): To receive full credit as a certified or recognized patient-centered For 2018 (proposed): To receive full credit as a certified or recognized patient-centered 4 To meet the PCMH requirement, a practice must meet one of the following criteria: (A) The practice has received accreditation from one of four accreditation organizations that are nationally recognized or certified, including (1) The Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care; (2) The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA); (3) The Joint Commission; or (4) The Utilization Review Accreditation Commission (URAC). (B) The practice is participating in a Medicaid Medical Home Model or Medical Home Model. (C) The practice is a comparable specialty practice that has received the NCQA Patient-Centered Specialty Recognition. (D) The practice has received accreditation from other certifying bodies that have certified a large number of medical organizations and meet national guidelines, as determined by the Secretary. The Secretary must determine that these certifying bodies must have 500 or more certified member practices, and require practices to include the following: (1) Have a personal physician/clinician in a team-based practice; (2) Have a whole-person orientation; (3) Provide coordination or integrated care; (4) Focus on quality and safety; and (5) Provide enhanced access. Note that In the CY 2018 QPP rule, CMS proposes that the term recognized be accepted as equivalent to the term certified. 9

specialty practice, at least 50% of the practice sites within the TIN must be recognized as a patient-centered medical home or comparable specialty practice. specialty practice, at least 50% of the practice sites within the TIN must be recognized as a patient-centered medical home or comparable specialty practice. APM Participant (maintained): A clinician identified on the Participation List of an APM. (maintained): A group where one clinician in the TIN is identified on the Participation List of an APM. Receives at least one-half of the highest score under the IA performance category. Same as 2017, except that a virtual group may be identified as an APM participant per the group determination. 10