Measurability of Patient Safety

Similar documents
Understanding Patient Choice Insights Patient Choice Insights Network

IMPORTANCE OF IMPROVING INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS OF MEDICAL PERSONNEL IN MINIMIZING MEDICAL LIABILITY CLAIMS PIOTR DANILUK, MD

SCORING METHODOLOGY APRIL 2014

CLINICAL SERVICES OVERVIEW

SENATE, No. 989 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY 16, 2018

Reviewing Methods Used in Patient Safety Research: Advantages and Disadvantages. This SPSRN work is funded by

ENVIRONMENT Preoperative evaluation clinic. Preoperative evaluation clinic. Preoperative evaluation clinic. clinic. clinic. Preoperative evaluation

Susan Moffatt-Bruce, MD, PhD Chief Quality and Patient Safety Officer Associate Professor of Surgery The Ohio State University s Wexner Medical Center

How to Win Under Bundled Payments

Investigation Outline for a Reportable Incident Non-Hospital Surgical Facility

Review for Required Monitors

Chinwe Nwosu, GE/NMF Scholar Supervisor: Dr. Stephen Ttendo, Senior Lecturer/ Head of Department of Anesthesia

Mohamad Fakih, MD, MPH

Medical Practitioner Reimbursement

Total Joint Partnership Program Identifies Areas to Improve Care and Decrease Costs Joseph Tomaro, PhD

Medication Safety in the Operating Room: Using the Operating Room Medication Safety Checklist

The Continuity of Care Maturity Model (CCMM) John Rayner Regional Director HIMSS Analytics

ADVANCED NURSING PRACTICE. Model question paper

Scoring Methodology FALL 2016

About the Report. Cardiac Surgery in Pennsylvania

Survey of Nurse Employers in California 2014

THE PREOPERATIVE PROCESS

Proposed Standards Revisions Related to Pain Assessment and Management

Pars Oil & Gas Company HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT PROCEDURE. HSE Anomaly Reporting Procedure DOCUMENT ID - PR-74-POGC-002 REVISION 0.

ABO SELF-DIRECTED IMPROVEMENT IN MEDICAL PRACTICE ACTIVITY (CLINICAL)

Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement in the Ophthalmic ASC

Intravenous Infusion Practices and Patient Safety: Insights from ECLIPSE

Reducing the Risk of Wrong Site Surgery

APPENDIX I QUESTIONNAIRE FOR INTERVIEWING THE ANAESTHESIA PROVIDER

Risk Management in the ASC

CRNAs Value for Your Team and Bottom Line

RESEARCH PROTOCOL M MED (ANAESTHESIOLOGY) DEPARTMENT OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF LIMPOPO (MEDUNSA CAMPUS)

Hip Replacement Surgery

IMPROVING THE QUALITY AND SAFETY OF HEALTHCARE IN SWITZERLAND: RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROPOSALS FOR THE FEDERAL STRATEGY

Health Science Career Cluster (HL) Therapeutic Services - Patient Care Career Pathway (HL-THR) 13 CCRS CTE

Improved Patient Care and Safety

Measuring Harm. Objectives and Overview

Patient Safety Research Introductory Course Session 3. Measuring Harm

Nursing Resources, Workload, the Work Environment and Patient Outcomes

THE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST NHS SAFETY THERMOMETER

September 6, RE: CY 2017 Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems Proposed Rule

The Ethos Program: Re-defining Normal

PHARMACY SERVICES/MEDICATION USE

Cost Effectiveness of Physician Anesthesia J.P. Abenstein, M.S.E.E., M.D. Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN

High Reliability Organizations The Key to Improving Quality and Safety

A9/B9: Integrating Patient Safety into Your System s DNA

Center of Excellence In Minimally Invasive Gynecology. Program Benefits Summary

Lessons in Quality Improvement from Around the World. The Netherlands

Walking the Tightrope with a Safety Net Blood Transfusion Process FMEA

Chapter 39. Nurse Staffing, Models of Care Delivery, and Interventions

MEDICARE UPDATES: VBP, SNF QRP, BUNDLING

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Regulations and their potential for limiting clinical negligence. Stuart Whittaker

Payment Policy: Visits On Same Day As Surgery Reference Number: CC.PP.040 Product Types: ALL Effective Date: 03/01/2018

Gantt Chart. Critical Path Method 9/23/2013. Some of the common tools that managers use to create operational plan

Pressure Ulcers ecourse

The Multidisciplinary aspects of JCI accreditation

Using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Metrics Data to Change Clinical Practice Abigail R. Blackmore, MSN, RN Pamela W.

PG snapshot Nursing Special Report. The Role of Workplace Safety and Surveillance Capacity in Driving Nurse and Patient Outcomes

Adverse Events in Hospitals: How Many and Why Not Reported. Fran Griffin Senior Manager Clinical Programs, BD

CPSM STANDARDS POLICIES For Rural Standards Committees

Bariatric Surgery Registry Outlier Policy

Scoring Methodology SPRING 2018

Scale is the latter has calculations for a level of risk which L

ROLE OF THE ANESTHETIST IN ORGANIZING AMBULATORY SURGERY. Dr. Paul Vercruysse M.D. Belgium

Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS) Ratchada Prakongsai Senior Manager

Scoring Methodology FALL 2017

OASIS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT REPORTS

1. Have you or a member of your family had first-hand experience of an adverse event or experienced harm in a healthcare setting in your country?

Preventing Serious Reportable Events in Health Care

Carol J. Peden BSC, MB ChB, MD, FRCA, FFICM, MPH Royal United Hospital, Bath

An Overview of NCQA Relative Resource Use Measures. Today s Agenda

Surgical Oncology II: R5 Tuesday, February 02, 2016

Health. Business Plan to Accountability Statement

9/29/2017. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery at the University of Virginia Medical Center. Disclosures. Objectives. None

TITLE: The impact of surgical timing in acute traumatic spinal cord injury

TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT BASKET OF CARE SUBCOMMITTEE Report to: Minnesota Department of Health. June 22, 2009

Patient Safety: 10 Years Later Why is Improvement So Hard? Patient Safety: Strong Beginnings

1875 Connecticut Ave. NW / Suite 650 / Washington, D.C / / fax /

NERC Improving Human Performance

SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATION Hospital Management System

Patient Safety and Quality Management

PANELS AND PANEL EQUITY

SAFETY AND QUALITY INDICATORS

Introduction. What Is Minilaparotomy?

Hospital Bed Occupancy Prediction

NOT INTENDED FOR DISTRIBUTION TO PATIENTS

ACS NSQIP Tools for Success. Pre-Conference Session July 25, 2015

HIMSS ASIAPAC 11 CONFERENCE & LEADERSHIP SUMMIT SEPTEMBER 2011 MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA

XIII. Health Statistics and Research. Kathy C. Trawick, EdD, RHIA, FAHIMA

Patient Safety Assessment in Slovak Hospitals

Standard Of Nursing Care During Blood Transfusion

Community Health Network, Inc. MEDICAL STAFF POLICIES & PROCEDURES

Patient Safety Initiatives of the VA National Center for Patient Safety

Making Clinical Governance Work

Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE ACS NSQIP PEDIATRIC. 1.1 Overview

Quality improvement for caesarean section - a multifactorial approach. Ian Wrench Consultant Anaesthetist Jessop Wing Obstetric Unit

Leroy Edozien. Consultants - Obstetrics & Gynaecology St Mary s Hospital, Manchester, UK

Index. Bone densitometry, 20. Family caregivers. See Informal care Functional impairment factors, 4,51 I 91

Nursing skill mix and staffing levels for safe patient care

Transcription:

Measurability of Patient Safety Marsha Fleischer IMPO Conference, November 17, 2016

External requirements in Germany lead to a higher need for safety and risk management, among others arising from the: German Patients Rights Act Decision of the Joint Federal Committee Patient safety as a national public health objective Patients / patient relatives Cost bearers Insurance industry Page 2

German Health Initiative Coalition for Patient Safety : Requirements for clinical RM systems in hospitals Graphic: Coalition for Patient Safety: Recommended action, requirements on clinical risk management systems in hospitals. April 2016 Principles of risk management: The management of hospitals and rehabilitation facilities developed a measurement system for assessing the effectiveness of clinical risk management systems Page 3

Possibilities of measuring

Patient Surveys Measuring of the Safety Culture Safety Index Employee Surveys Analysis of Claims Page 5

Database Database of medical malpractice claims Preventive measures based on historical loss experience Safety and risk analyzes Page 6

Safety and Risk analyzes Damage Risks Prevention Measures Page 7

2. The procedure for the first application of new materials / products is discussed and planned preoperatively in team-time-outs. Floki - Fotolia.com 1. When switching to other bone cement mixing systems, instructions regarding its proper handling is provided during an introductory training to the entire surgical team, before using the new system for the first time - (information is provided on characteristics and proportions of the components to be mixed). 3. During a surgery, it is strictly avoided to combine any materials / products that serve the same purpose but are of different manufacturers (here: bone cement mixing systems). 4. The responsible surgeons are involved in the decision-making process relating to the change of materials (procuring, selection). Page 8

Model of Safety Management Hazards Adverse event / Accident Barriers to safety or holes in processes Illustration: Swiss Cheese Model of System Accidents (adapted from Reason), http://www.aezq.de/patientensicherheit/fehlertheorie Page 9

Effect of Prevention Measures Risk Prevention Measure 1 Prevention Measure 2 Prevention Measure 3 Prof. Dr. Winfried Zinn 2015 Modified Swiss Cheese Model adopted from Reason, J. (2000). "Human error: models and management." British Medical Journal 320: 768-770 Page 10

Classification of the Potential Risk Severity of injury or damage Probability of occurrence 150 Standard care for newborns 1026 Care of newborns of diabetic mothers 154 Application of phototherapy Transfer of patients in the OR OR checklist Marking the surgery site 1024 Definition of neonatal disorders More often than once a year Once in 1 to 3 years Once in 3 years or less often Without any injury or damage Temporary effects of injuries / damages Permanent consequences of injury / damage Serious harm or even death Page 11

Categories of Safety - example Organization in the Recovery Room Prevention measure The recovery room is located near to the operating room area. A reasonable personnel deployment planning of medical and nursing staff ensures a continuous monitoring of a patient in the postoperative phase. It is stipulated that in the event of any complications the respective competent physician is immediately consulted. The service time of the recovery room ends reasonably later after the end of the service time of the OR. Patients who still need to be monitored after the service time of the recovery room ends, are taken care of adequately. The recovery room staff transfers the patient to the staff of the ward providing the further treatment in a structured way. Severity of injury or damage Temporary effects of injuries / damages Permanent consequences of injury / damage Permanent consequences of injury / damage Temporary effects of injuries / damages Permanent consequences of injury / damage Permanent consequences of injury / damage Probability of occurrence Once in 1 to 3 years More than once a year More than once a year Once in 1 to 3 years Once in 3 years or less often More than once a year Page 12

Elements of the calculation / formula Calculating the potential risk Mathematical connection of the potential risk to the fulfillment of any preventive measure which is used in an analysis for the index calculation (0, 25, 50, 75 or 100%) Scaling of 0 to 100 Page 13

A comparison between the first safety and risk analysis in a surgical ward of a hospital and status at the time of evaluation Categories of safety Safety and risk analysis of October 2013 Change Evaluation December 2014 91 Patient information in general Treatment ICU/anesthesiology Ulcer management Documentation anesthesia General documentation Specialist physician standard Identity assurance / avoiding patient misidentification Medication management Emergency management Organization anesthesia, ICU Organization recovery room Organization OR Organization wards Pain management Falls management Procedures/regulations OR Total index Page 14

A comparison of safety and risk analyses that were conducted in several surgical wards of a hospital group incl. benchmark data Ø86 Categories of security Patient information in general Treatment ICU/anesthesiology Ulcer management Documentation anesthesia General documentation Specialist physician standard Identity assurance / avoiding patient misidentification Medication management Emergency management Organization anesthesia, ICU Organization recovery room Organization OR Organization wards Pain management Falls management Procedures/regulations OR Benchmark riskala Average carrier Total index A comparison of 21 assessments in surgical departments (data of riskala ) Page15

Total index First analysis: 65 points Evaluation: 91 points Page 16

Possibilities of measuring

Chance for achieving more internal and external transparency

Thank you for your attention! marsha.fleischer@grb.de