Bond Frequently Asked Questions

Similar documents
Bond Community Involvement Committee 2014 School Bond Final Report

Portland Public Schools

Preliminary: Subject to change as new information becomes available

Frequently Asked Questions 2018 Bond Program

Q. What are we voting on? Q. How was the referendum developed?

SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION FUNDING

FAQ s HISTORY AND FEATURES. 1. What is on the May 8, 2018 ballot? 2. How was this bond program developed?

SCHOOL BOARD WORK SESSION April 4, 2017 Strategic Plan Report

2013 Bond Election Presentation

Colorado School Finance Project School finance research since 1995.

Frequently Asked Questions

Ballot Measures-J Section

Funding Options in a Recovering Economy

Issue Paper: Capital Outlay. Issue Paper: Capital Outlay

Frequently Asked Questions May 8, 2018 Sinking Fund Election

Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2017

School Board s Advertised Budget Fiscal Year 2017

San Dieguito Union High School District

BCPS 2017 Bond Issue Frequently Asked Questions

BALLJT MEASURE SUBMITTAL FORM

WHERE S THE MONEY? Waging Effective Capital Campaigns. Florida Educational Facilities Planners Association Summer Conference 2013

The Killeen ISD Board of Trustees unanimously approved calling a $426 million bond election, consisting of two propositions, to be held on May 5,

I Title Superintendent, Tigard-Tua latin School District

Capital Projects Levy

Frequently Asked Questions

UNDERSTANDING THE BOND REFERENDUM HELPING YOU PREPARE FOR THE NOVEMBER 8 VOTE

Marion Local Facility Expansion. Marion Local School District April 30, 2018

Bond Issue Update. Board of Education Meeting June 5, 2014 Thomas Wiseman Assistant Superintendent Business & Operations

DAVIS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND MEASURE FULL BALLOT TEXT

State Education Finance Study Commission Issue Paper: Capital Outlay

UNDERSTANDING THE BOND REFERENDUM HELPING YOU PREPARE FOR THE NOVEMBER 8 VOTE

BOND FINANCING AND ALTERNATIVE FUNDING FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS

School Facility Program Review Fall Conference Responses from Membership SUMMARY OF NEW PROGRAM CONCEPTS COLLECTED

ALPINE COUNTY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITIES MASTER PLAN

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DIVISION OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE 1 CCR BUILDING EXCELLENT SCHOOLS TODAY GRANT PROGRAM

CENTRALIA SCHOOL DISTRICT

Facilities Construction

This meeting will not be televised.

MANAGING RISK v. REWARD HOW TO BALANCE CREATIVE DESIGN WITH THE REALITIES OF PROJECT BUDGETS, SCHEDULES & SCOPE. Panel

8.1 Organizational Structure

Capital Plan Instructions: Five-Year Capital Plan Submission for 2019/20

5.1 EXISTING REVENUE/FUNDING SOURCES

LOCAL MEASURES FOR NOVEMBER 8, 2016 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

MARTIN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Capital Account

Baltimore City Public Schools 10-Year Buildings Plan: Implementation Strategy

NEIGHBORHOOD OPPORTUNITY FUND Program Overview

Proposition 1: Educational Programs and Operations Levy. Updated

San Francisco Sheriff s Department Presentation To Community Corrections Partnership

UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING BUDGET PRIMER UW Office of Academic Affairs and Budget Office Last update April 2013

STUDENT POPULATION BY ETHNIC GROUPS

PROGRESS IN EDUCATION BENEFITING STUDENTS HIGHLIGHTS OF CHANGES TO GRANTS FOR STUDENT NEEDS

University of Missouri

LEVY OVERVIEW AND LEVY CERTIFICATION INFORMATION. Where do all these numbers come from? Tax Levy Workshop

Canby Façade Improvement Program

PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT:

RIVERSIDE LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT JANUARY 2016

Solar Electricity For Community Buildings Pilot Program. Workbook

GREENE COUNTY CSD PROPOSED BOND ISSUE Frequently Asked Questions Updated

Workplace Safety and Health Management System Administration

November 6 th REMEMBER TO TURN OVER THE BALLOT! DEAR COMMUNITY MEMBERS: QUESTION #1 QUESTION #2. IN this Newsletter: FACILITY NEEDS & SOLUTIONS

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 15, 2004, unless a later date is cited at the end of a section. [ NMAC - Rp,

Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District RFP# REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR FACILITIES MASTER PLAN Released 7/29/05 Revised 8/2/05

Education, Department of. Project Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) Governor s Planning Estimates. Governor s Rec. Agency Request

Annual Performance Plan Fiscal Year 2017

Spotlight on the Stimulus

GUIDE FOR DEVELOPING A BASIC BUSINESS PLAN FOR CHARTER SCHOOLS

PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPITAL OUTLAY COUNCIL STANDARDS-BASED AWARDS revised 7/23/2007

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (ARRA) May 1, :30 p.m.

Hospital Energy Efficiency Program Program (HEEP) Overview for Presentation to LHINs and Health Service Providers

Special School Levy Proposals. (& Brief School Highlights /Quick Facts) *** Informational Community Forum January 8, 2018

HB 2017 Transit Advisory Committee. July 27, 2018

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. DIVISION 27 School Construction Matching Program

Responses to questions for Dunwoody HS DADS Group Wednesday, March 7, 2018

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

What s Inside... January 2013

September 5, 2018 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs) EPS REFERENDUM 18 VOTE, Tuesday, October 2, 2018

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)

A Blueprint for New School Construction and Capital Improvement for New Bedford Public Schools

Juvenile Corrections Changes. Assembly Bill

La Veta Facilities Taskforce. January 5, 2018

REGIONAL WATER & SEWER DISTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY, PETITION, AND PLAN OF OPERATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Periodic Review. Quick and easy guidance on the when and how to update your comprehensive plan

Additionally, the committee was opened to anyone who wanted to participate.

TOWN OF GREENWICH Annual Department Operational Plan (FY )

Alamosa - New Elementary School

Evidence2Success 2017 Site Selection. Request for Proposals

Page. II. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS.. 3 A. Introduction... B. Technical Assistance Areas.. 1. Rate Design Consumer Programs...

CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

The State School Fund:

Weighted Student Formula

Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education (PASSHE) a. The October 17, 2013, Board meeting minutes state the following:

Actual Expenditures, Last Three Budgets, include funding sources:

Washington Headquarters Services Military Construction, Defense-Wide FY 2010 Budget Estimates ($ in thousands)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF BOMET PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD VACANCIES

State Board of Education Fixed Capital Outlay Legislative Budget Request

Proposed Site 13 th High School Community Input

Scott E. Bennett, P.E. Director. Arkansas Asphalt Pavement Association

Business Oregon Annual Performance Progress Report Reporting Year 2017 Published: 9/27/2017 2:53:37 PM

California Community Colleges

NOW THEREFORE, the parties enter into the following Agreement:

Transcription:

Bond Frequently Asked Questions Q: This Bond program totals $680 million. How does that compare with prior BSD Bond programs? A: The proposed 2014 Bond is quite comparable with recent Bond programs considering the period of time it will cover and adjusting for inflation. Beaverton s most recent bond measures were approved in 1996, 2000, and 2006. Adjusted for inflation, in 2013 dollars, the amount approved for these three bond measures total about $629 million. The 2014 Bond will cover requirements for an 8 to 10-year period. Q: What will the Bond cost? A: Due to retiring previous bonds, this measure is expected to result in no increase in the District s existing bond tax rate of $2.11/$1,000 of assessed value. Beaverton s bond tax rate is lower than several comparable school districts including: West Linn-Wilsonville, Hillsboro, North Clackamas, Salem-Kaiser. Q: If my tax rate has being staying the same, why has my tax bill increased? A: Property tax bill goes up if assessed value increases: [fixed % rate] x [value] = $ bill. Schools are only part of the property tax bill. Q: What would the tax rate be if the bond is not approved? A: Without new bond, Beaverton School District s bond tax rate would decrease to about $1.37/$1,000 in 2015. Q: If assessed property values increase faster than forecasted, the $2.11/$1,000 tax rate will generate more revenue than estimated. How will that funding be used? A: All revenue generated for the Bond issue must be used for paying down the bonded debt. The bond tax rate would be lowered if assessed property values increase more than projected. Q: Didn t we just pass a bond last May 2013? A: No, Beaverton voters passed a five year Local Option Levy last May 2013. 100% of the levy funding was dedicated to teachers, hiring over 150 teachers. The levy did not provide funding for buildings. Under Oregon s school funding system, local communities are responsible for funding major school construction and repairs through capital bond measures. There is no state funding provided for these needs. State law prohibits use of bond funds for operational costs such as teachers and support staff.

School districts generally do not use General Funds for major capital costs. However, if this bond is not approved, the District would have to address immediate building repairs by using General Fund resources. One example is the Sunset HS roof that must be replaced soon at a cost of $3 million. Q: What do Modernization projects entail? A: This category of work represents 55% of the Bond investments. It includes replacement of old schools, renovations of some buildings, renewing worn out building components, safety improvements for seismic and security needs, and building code compliance upgrades. Q: What are the repairs that will be made throughout the district? A: These are a collection of projects that will replace worn out building components such as roofs, boilers, HVAC equipment, electrical systems, etc. In general, they are significant building improvements that extend the useful life of existing buildings. These projects represent about one-third of the Modernization work, which is 55% of the Bond. Q: How were the repairs identified and prioritized? A: Identification: BSD staff conduct regular inspections of all existing buildings evaluating the condition and life expectancy of facility components. Improvement projects address items that should have been replaced already, plus forecasted requirements over the term of the Bond based upon life-expectancy estimates. Prioritization: Each requirement was scored with two factors: 1) likelihood of failure, and 2) severity of the impact of a failure. These were combined into a single score that was then used in the priority ranking. Q: Will all schools get an equal share of the bond funds for repairs? A: No, newer schools do not have as many needs as older buildings. However, every BSD school will receive some improvement projects. Q: Why were these specific four schools (Vose, William Walker, Hazeldale and the Arts & Communication Magnet Academy) chosen for replacement versus repairs? A: A Facility Condition Index (FCI) rating showed these were in the worst condition of all Beaverton schools. The FCI is a ratio of the cost of repairs vs. the building replacement cost. From a long-term financial investment perspective, the most cost-effective solution is to replace these buildings rather than pour in more repair dollars. Also, repairs would not address major functional deficiencies in these old buildings that impact students learning environment and safety. Each of these buildings is one-story; new schools will be two-story to better utilize existing school sites, expand capacity, eliminate portables at those sites, meet modern standards for fire protection, security, & seismic design, improve parking lots by separating buses from autos, and allow more space for playground improvements.

Q: Does BSD really need more capacity? A: Four of Beaverton School District s five HS s are already near, or over capacity. High schools currently use 21 portable classrooms; Westview HS has 16 and is at 123% of permanent capacity. In addition, a number of our elementary schools are at capacity. PSU Population Research Center forecasts continued HS student enrollment growth for BSD. PSU Population Research Center provides Beaverton s long-range demographic forecasting and has been generally reliable in the past. Metro and Washington County are both expecting continued population growth. All data Beaverton has indicates enrollment increases at all levels. Q: How was the new high school site chosen? A: Finding a satisfactory location for a large high school site is challenging in the mostly urbanized area where BSD is located. Beaverton SD studied 25 potential locations for a new high school site and found the southwest site to be the most suitable. The 25 sites were evaluated using criteria that included: site size, number of parcels needed to assemble a 40 to 45 acre site, land use and zoning restrictions, transportation access, topography, and other environmental constraints impacting development. The proposed HS site is in an area primed for significant growth due to Metro s expansion of the Urban Growth Boundary in South Cooper Mountain in 2011 and the expected development of between 3,746 to 5,138 residential dwelling units within BSD s boundary. The selected site provides long-term balance in high school locations: 2 in the north, 2 in the middle, and 2 in the south. Q: Why does BSD need another Middle School? A: Lots of housing construction is happening north of Hwy 26; Beaverton SD only has one middle school in the area (Stoller, which is already at 121% of capacity). BSD owns property acquired previously for middle school construction that will be used for this school. Q: How will the furniture requirements for new schools be funded? A: The new construction project budgets include the cost of new furniture. Q: Why not provide more capacity for Springville K-8? A: The District will be adding two portables (four classrooms) to Springville K-8 for the 2014-2015 school year. The proposed new K-5 in North Bethany will add space for 750 more students. This is much more than a 4 to 6 new classroom addition at Springville would add. A new middle school at Timberland will add capacity for an additional 1,100 students at grades 6 8. These two new schools will provide a better long-term solution for addressing growth in the north part of the District. Timing for constructing the new K-5 could be re-evaluated based upon enrollment growth.

Q: Will there be more added K-5 capacity in addition to the new K-5 in North Bethany? A: Yes. Each of the replacement school projects will also expand the capacity at those schools by replacing old one-story structures with modern two-story buildings. K-5 capacity will increase by an additional 418 students due to the replacements; the new K-5 school will add 750 for a total increase of 1,168 at the K-5 level. Q: Why is BSD planning to buy land in the South Cooper Mountain area? A: This area is primed for significant growth due to Metro s expansion of the Urban Growth Boundary in South Cooper Mountain in 2011. Planners for the City of Beaverton have recommended that we plan for the expected development of between 3,746 to 5,138 residential dwelling units with 952 to 1,306 K-8 students within BSD s boundary. Q: How much new capacity is planned in the Bond? A: The total increase in student capacity will be 4,518 broken down as follows: HS = 2,225 MS = 1,125 ES = 1,168 Q: How will BSD fund new teachers and staff for the new schools? A: As students are shifted to new schools to relieve overcrowding, a proportional number of teaching staff will follow the students. As enrollment grows, which it is forecasted to do, additional operational funding will be provided by the State, which uses a funding formula based upon student enrollment numbers. These factors address most of the operational funding needed at the three new schools. However, some support costs (school front office staff, custodial, grounds, utilities, etc.) will need to be addressed in the normal General Fund budget development process, probably beginning with the 2016-17 budget. Q: Why is technology part of this Bond but was not in previous bonds? A: Oregon law was changed in 2010 by a statewide ballot measure to allow use of Bond funding for technology. About 10% of the Bond will fund technology investments. The technology proposed in this Bond includes: The District has 15,526 computers used daily by staff and students. The following chart shows that the majority of computers used in schools are of an age that limits their ability to provide a useful user experience.

Address immediate school and classroom technology needs District-wide, one-third of computers currently used by students are unable to be repaired due to the age of the equipment. Since the move to District-owned and personally-owned computing devices will take some time, it is important that we address critical and immediate school and classroom technology needs. In addition, the wireless network at every school will be upgraded to meet the connectivity needs of district-owned and personally-owned devices. Digital Conversion describes the transformation of learning from paper-based resources to an environment that includes curriculum and instructional materials in digital formats. It will take a number of years. The critical factors in Beaverton s digital conversion are the changes in how teachers access and incorporate additional learning resources in their work, and how students use technology tools and devices to explore tools and content, process information, and demonstrate their learning. Teachers will need job-embedded support to ensure they are using a wide variety of technology tools, students will have the ability to creatively direct and demonstrate their learning, access quality, real-time content, and collaborate with others. Teachers will have the ability to access, modify, and customize content and activities to meet the unique needs of all learners. Students will graduate better prepared to successfully enter the world of higher A Learning Management System is an online space used to provide content, deliver assessments, and allow for teacher/learner exchange of documents and communication. The implementation of a Learning Management System will provide a workspace for students and teachers to interact through content and activities and assessments to be delivered and scored.

Q: Is it true the District s phone system is 20 years old? A: Components of the existing system are over 20 years old with no ability to upgrade. System failures occur regularly at schools due to the age of the system. The bond would provide funds to replace the existing phone system and improve 9-1-1 emergency response capabilities. Q: Why does the District need another Data Center? A: The District needs a modern data center to provide continuous and secure access to enterprise applications including the student information system and the HR/Finance system. The new data center will double the District s network capacity and will be installed in a separate location to better protect the District from the effects of a catastrophic event at the current single location. Q: Why is Green Energy Technology included? A: Effective in 2013, State law now requires that all construction and major renovations of public buildings include at least 1.5% of the construction cost for passive energy generation technology. We expect that this funding will be used for solar photovoltaic panels, which will then provide free electricity to these school buildings for a portion of their needs. Q: Why did Superintendent Rose recommend investing some bond funds in musical instruments? A: This was not a matter considered or presented to the Bond Committee as it was being processed separately by the Music Task Force and staff. Based upon that work, Supt. Rose was concerned that there is a significant inequity of music resources across the district. For that reason, he recommended that all Beaverton SD music classrooms be resourced with the minimum inventory of musical instruments. He worked with staff to reallocate $250,000 from the Bond program contingency line item to support classroom music instrument procurement. 3.21.14