RESPONSE TO CONGRESS:

Similar documents
FOIA Request Defense Freedom of Information Division 1155 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OFFICE OF FREEDOM OF INFORMATION 1155 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

'i'~~~ DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OFFICE OF FREEDOM OF INFORMATION 1155 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC OCT 2015.

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON, DC

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: DoD Information Security Program and Protection of Sensitive Compartmented Information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Use of Military Force Authorization Language in the 2001 AUMF

Subj: MARINE CORPS POLICY ON ORGANIZING, TRAINING, AND EQUIPPING FOR OPERATIONS IN AN IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (IED) ENVIRONMENT

OUR MISSION PARTNERS DISA S BUDGET. TOTAL DOD COMPONENT/AGENCY ORDERS FOR DISA DWCF FY16 (in thousands)

SECRETARY OF THE ARMY WASHINGTON

INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 4800 MARK CENTER DRIVE ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA

Confrontation or Collaboration?

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 01. l E~D!NG IN TEL LI GE N CE J NTE G RATION

Department of Defense. Federal Managers Financial Integrity Act. Statement of Assurance. Fiscal Year 2014 Guidance

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON. DC

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333: UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

DOD DIRECTIVE PAST CONFLICT PERSONNEL ACCOUNTING POLICY

Joint Training: What NGA Needs from Combatant Commands (Help Us Help You!)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

National Guard Personnel and Deployments: Fact Sheet

ASMC National 2016 PDI. June 1-3, 2016

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. DoD Policy for Congressional Authorization and Appropriations Reporting Requirements

Introduction to Homeland Security. The Intelligence Community (IC) Director of National Intelligence (DNI) National Intelligence Coord.

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Beyond Phase II Conference RIF Overview

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Fellowships, Scholarships, Training With Industry (TWI), and Grants for DoD Personnel

DOD INSTRUCTION VOLUNTARY SEPARATION PAY (VSP) PROGRAM FOR SERVICE MEMBERS

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

IRAQ SURVEY GROUP STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD OCTOBER 2004

Report to Congress on Distribution of Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Workloads for Fiscal Years 2015 through 2017

Don t Let USERRA s Five- Year Limit Bite You

INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DIRECTIVE NUMBER 501

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

CONFERENCE MATERIAL DAY ONE 19TH ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE FIELD OF NATIONAL SECURITY LAW

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Information Assurance (IA) and Interoperability (IOP) Evaluations

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

CRS Report for Congress

DoD Conference Guidance

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release December 5, 2016

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

GAO DEFENSE CONTRACTING. Improved Policies and Tools Could Help Increase Competition on DOD s National Security Exception Procurements

Department of Defense MANUAL. DoD Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Program

DOD INSTRUCTION INVESTIGATIONS BY DOD COMPONENTS

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

I. Description of Operations Financed:

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Counterintelligence (CI) in the Combatant Commands and Other DoD Components

Department Of Defense Policy And Instruction For Leave Request

DoD Instruction Job Training, Employment Skills Training, Apprenticeships and Internships

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR INTELLIGENCE AND SPECIAL PROGRAM ASSESSMETS

Veterans Affairs: Gray Area Retirees Issues and Related Legislation

GREGORY A. SCOVEL. Work Experience Bent Creek Terrace Leesburg, VA (703)

Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Budget Estimates

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

The reserve components of the armed forces are:

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide

WHO'S IN AND WHO'S OUT

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DIRECTIVE NUMBER 304

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Statement of FBI Executive Assistant Director for Intelligence Maureen A. Baginski. Before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence

TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES, AND OF MILITARY RULES OF ENGAGEMENT, FROM RELEASE UNDER FREEDOM OF

(15) VerDate Sep :18 May 12, 2016 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A532.XXX A532

U.S. Forces in Afghanistan

Information Security Oversight Office

CHAPTER 7 MANAGING THE CONSEQUENCES OF DOMESTIC WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION INCIDENTS

Department of Defense CHARTER

Behind the Scenes of Intelligence Resourcing

PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCES

Thesis Style Capitalization Reference Sheet

SUBJECT: Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) Law Enforcement Reporting of Suspicious Activity

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

GEOINT Standards Working Group (GWG)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

DFARS Procedures, Guidance, and Information

TITLE III OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Department of Defense

DOD INSTRUCTION STATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM (SPP)

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE T: Overseas Humanitarian Assistance Shared Information System (OHASIS)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. DoD Executive Agent for the Unexploded Ordnance Center of Excellence (UXOCOE)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. Inspector General of the Department of Defense (IG DoD)

ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS RELATING TO TOTAL FORCE MANAGEMENT (SEC. 933)

Transcription:

.. T9P St;CRET!/SI/,cNOF9RN RESPONSE TO CONGRESS: SECRETARY OF DEFENSE REPORT ON FEDERAL DATA MINING PROORAMS WITIIIN TilE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Fiscal Year 2014 Prepantioa of tbil study/report colt t.. e De.,.rtme t of Defeue tobll of pprost. tely $18,957.36 for Fiscal Year 2015 Ge~~nated H 21J5Marelllt RefiD VSIII1669-J4 UNCLASSIMEB WlmN-SEP*RATEB-PROM AT'f'IICIIMIEN'FS T9P SE MlT/ISII,cN9FQRN

TOP SECRET//SJ//NOFOR..~ (U) The Office of the Secretary of Defense is pleased to provide Congress this report pursuant to Section 804 of the ImplementingRecomrnendations of the 9/ll Commission Act of 2007, entitled The Federal Agency Data Mining Reporting Act of 2007 ("the Act"). (U) Congressionally Directed Action Requirement: This report responds to a congressional request for the Department of Defense to provide information on its data mining activities as dire cted by the Implementing Recommendations ofthe 9/11 Commission Act of 200 7. Section 804 of that legislation; the Data Mining Reporting Act, requires the head of each department or agency of the Federal Government that is engaged in any activity to use or develop data mining, as defmed by the act, to submit a report on all such activities to Congress. (U) Background and Scope: On August 3, 2007, President Bush signed into law the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of2007. Section 804 of that legislation, the Federal Agency Data Mining Reporting Act, requires annual reports on government data mining programs beginning 180 days from the Data Mining Reporting Act's enactment. This Fiscal Year 2014 report was prepared by the Office of the Under Secretary ofdefense for Intelligence and responds to the above requirement. (U) Each of the Department of Defense Components that engaged in data mining activities during fiscal year 20 14 was tasked to submit a report that contained the following information in accordance with Section 804: o (U) A thorough description of the data mining activity, its goals and, where appropriate, the target dates for the deployment of the data mining activity. o (U) A thorough description of the data mining technology that was or will be used, to include the basis for detennination of whether a particular pattern or anomaly was indicative of terrorist or criminal activity. o (U) A thorough description of the data sources that were used. o (U) An assessment of the efficacy or likely efficacy of the data mining activity to provide accurate information consistent with and valuable to the stated goals and plans for the data mining activity. o (U) An assessment of the impact or likely impact of the implementation of the data mining activity on the privacy and civil liberties of individuals, including a thorough description of the actions taken or will be taken with regard to the property, privacy, or other rights or privileges of any individual or individuals as a result of the implementation of the data mining activity. o (U) A list and analysis of the laws and regulations that govern the information collected, reviewed, gathered, analyzed, or used in conjunction with the data UNCLASSIFIED WIIEN SEPARATED FROM ATTM?HMENT8 TOP SECMTNSI/,!NOFORN

TOP SECRET//SI//N0 0RN mining activity, to the extent applicable in the context of the data mining activity. o (U) A thorough discussion of the policies, procedures, and guidelines that are in place or that are to be developed and applied in the use of such data mining activity in order to: (U) Protect the privacy and due process rights of individuals, such as redress procedures; and (U) Ensure that only accurate and complete information is collected, reviewed, gathered, analyzed, or used, and guard against any hannful consequences of potential inaccuracies. (U) Department of Defense Response: The report was developed from inputs from all relevant DoD Components, in coordination with the Defense Privacy and Civil Liberties Division. The report is separated into UNCLASSIFIED and CLASSIFIED responses. (U) For the FY 2014 reporting period: (U) Military Services: The U.S. Army, U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, and U.S. Marine Corps reported they did not engage in any data mining activities as defined by the Federal Data Mining Activity Reporting Act of2007. (U) Combatant Commands: The Joint Staff, U.S. Central Command, U.S. Pacific Command, U.S. Northern Command, U.S. Africa Command, U.S. Transportation Command, U.S. Strategic Command, U.S. Special Operations Command, U.S. Southern Command, U.S. European Command, and U.S. Forces Korea reported they did not engage in data mining activities as defined by the Federal Data Mining Activity Reporting Act of 2007. (U) National Security Agency (NSA): NSA reported they engaged in data mining as defined under definition contained in the Federal Data Mining Activity Reporting Act of 2007 pursuant to their mission for foreign intelligence purposes to include the detection of terrorist activities. Their classified report is contained in Annex A. (U) National Geospatial-InteUigence Agency (NGA): NGA reported they engaged in data mining activities as defined under the definition of the Federal Data Mining Activity Reporting Act of2007 in support of its mission to provide tiinely, relevant, and accurate geospatial intelligence in support of national security. Their classified report is contained in Annex B. (U) Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (JIEDDO): JIEDDO reported they engaged in data mining activities as defined under the definition of the Federal Data Mining Activity Reporting Act of 2007 to perform searches on data -ljnclassified WHEN SEPARATED FROM AITACIIMENTS TOP 8ECRETJ/SI/INOFORN

TOP SECRET//Slh'NOFOil.~ compiled from a variety of databases used by U.S. and coalition military forces. Their unclassified report is contained in Annex C and their classified report is contained in Annex D. (U) Defense lqtelligence Agency (DIA) and National Reconnaisnnce Office (NRO): Both DIA and the NRO reported they did not engage in data mining activities as defined by the Federal Data Mining Activity Reporting Act of2007. (U) Conclusion: The Department of Defense has compiled this report for Congress in compliance with the Federal Data Mining Activity Reporting Act of2007. The Department continues to ensure the effectiveness of data mining programs while protecting all applicable privacy and due process rights of individuals. UNCLASSIFIED "liii N SEPARATED FROM ATTA.:CIDIENT~ I 'FOP SECRE'FHSIHNOFOR..'l I

46 remaining pages denied in full pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552 (b)(l)