DOC & PRISONER REENTRY

Similar documents
OFFENDER REENTRY PROGRAM

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Agenda: Community Supervision Subgroup

TJJD the Big Picture OBJECTIVES

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

WRITTEN TESTIMONY SUBMITTED BY DOUGLAS SMITH, MSSW TEXAS CRIMINAL JUSTICE COALITION

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Plan. Assembly Bill 109 and 117. FY Realignment Implementation

STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECIDIVISM AND REVOCATION RATES

Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109)

Testimony of Michael C. Potteiger, Chairman Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole House Appropriations Committee February 12, 2014

Transition from Jail to Community (TJC) Fresno County Sheriff s Department Fresno County Probation Department

Statewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates

*Chapter 3 - Community Corrections

5/25/2010 REENTRY COURT PROGRAM

Closing the Revolving Door: Community. National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 2, 2011

Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide

A Strategic Planning Framework for Prisoner Reentry TARGETS FOR POLICY CHANGE THAT GUIDE IMPLEMENTATION

Arizona Department of Corrections

Justice Reinvestment in West Virginia

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Act

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

Justice Reinvestment in Indiana Analyses & Policy Framework

Factors Impacting Recidivism in Vermont. Report to House and Senate Committees April 21, 2011

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2013 to FISCAL YEAR 2022

Bryan Brandenburg. Director, Division of Institutions, State of Alaska, Dept. of Corrections.

CSG JUSTICE CENTER MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW

Bureau of Community Sanctions Audit Standards

Chapter 5 COMMUNITY SUPERVISION. Introduction to Corrections CJC 2000 Darren Mingear

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PROGRAM MONTHLY STATUS REPORT

Annual Report

Deputy Probation Officer I/II

Second Chance Act Grants: State, Local, and Tribal Reentry Courts

The Florida Legislature

Steven K. Bordin, Chief Probation Officer

The Michigan Department of Corrections Special Alternative Incarceration Program

DISABILITY-RELATED INQUIRIES CONCERNING INDIVIDUALS INCARCERATED IN PRISON. Prepared by the Disability Rights Network of Pennsylvania

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2012 to FISCAL YEAR 2021

Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Action Minutes Monday, February 8, :30 p.m.

The Transition from Jail to Community (TJC) Initiative

2016 Bidders Conference for Requests for Proposals (RFPs)

OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

Nevada Department of Public Safety Division of Parole and Probation PAROLE AND PROBATION RE-ENTRY PROGRAMS

Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Agenda Monday, February 12, :30 pm

Overview of Recommendations to Champaign County Regarding the Criminal Justice System

SUNSET ADVISORY COMMISSION. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Board of Pardons and Paroles Correctional Managed Health Care Committee

Introduction. Jail Transition: Challenges and Opportunities. National Institute

Department of Public Safety Division of Juvenile Justice March 20, 2013

Tarrant County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet

North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission

Virginia Serious and Violent Offender Re-entry Initiative (VASAVOR Initiative): Going Home to Stay

New Directions --- A blueprint for reforming California s prison system to protect the public, reduce costs and rehabilitate inmates

Adult Parole and Probation in California

PRE-RELEASE TERMINATION AND POST-RELEASE RECIDIVISM RATES OF COLORADO S PROBATIONERS: FY2014 RELEASES

Review of the Federal Bureau of Prisons Release Preparation Program

The Final Report of the Evaluation of the Court Support Services Division s Probation Transition Program

Department of Corrections Presentation for House Appropriation Committee January 27, 2016

Washoe County Department of Alternative Sentencing

Statewide Misdemeanant Confinement Program Annual Report Fiscal Year North Carolina Sheriffs' Association

Texas Department of Criminal Justice

DIVISION OF ADULT CORRECTION:

Justice Reinvestment in Arkansas

Office of Criminal Justice Services

Characteristics of Adults on Probation, 1995

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Justice Reinvestment in Massachusetts

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

County Associations and State Governments: Working Together Toward Smart Justice

Oriana House, Inc. Programming & Criteria Guide

Texas Department of Criminal Justice Biennial Report of the Reentry and Integration Division

2007 Innovations Awards Program APPLICATION

Chapter 7 MANAGING PRISONS AND PRISONERS. Introduction to Corrections CJC 2000 Darren Mingear

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRENDS

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT. Data Collection Efforts

Justice Reinvestment in Missouri

CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRENDS

PROGRESSIVE INTERVENTIVE SANCTIONS AND INCENTIVES MODEL IN EL PASO, HUDSPETH AND CULBERSON COUNTIES

TARRANT COUNTY DIVERSION INITIATIVES

IN JUNE 2012, GOVERNOR SAM BROWNBACK,

Forensic Assertive Community Treatment Team (FACT) A bridge back to the community for people with severe mental illness

OVERVIEW OF THE COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS SYSTEM OF THAILAND

Prisoner Reentry and Adult Education. With our time together, we propose

The Primacy of Drug Intervention in Public Safety Realignment Success. CSAC Healthcare Conference June 12, 2013

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

NEW MEXICO CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT STRATEGIC PLAN (August 2005)

North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission

INMATE PROGRAMS. Partially-Sentenced Inmate: An inmate serving one or more sentences with adjudicated charges or holds.

Marin County STAR Program: Keeping Severely Mentally Ill Adults Out of Jail and in Treatment

Instructions for completion and submission

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AGENDA ITEM IMPLEMENTATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY REENTRY COURT PROGRAM (DISTRICT: ALL)

Juvenile Justice. Transformation

CALL FOR PRESENTERS TRAINING INSTITUTE THEME

Biennial State Plan July 1, 2017 June 30, 2019

Indiana Criminal Justice Association Presentation October 18 th, 2016

Instructions for completion and submission

H.B Implementation Report

Incarcerating nearly 60,000 inmates in state prison facilities

Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of U.S. Department of Justice Fact Sheet

Harris County Mental Health Jail Diversion Program Harris County Sequential Intercept Model

annual REPORT Introduction July 1st, 2011

Transcription:

DOC & PRISONER REENTRY

Mission DOC provides secure confinement, reformative programs, and a process of supervised community reintegration to enhance the safety of our communities. 2

DOC At a Glance Alaska is one of six states in the nation that operates a unified correctional system In FY2014, DOC booked 37,106 offenders into its facilities, including 3,374 Title 47 bookings As of June 30, 2014, 6,208 offenders were in prison, a community residential center (CRC), or on electronic monitoring (EM) As of June 30, 2014, 6,058 offenders were on probation or parole 3

Twelve facilities statewide with a total capacity of 5,224 beds Thirteen field probation offices statewide Eight contract CRCs with a capacity of 839 beds EM operates in six communities with a capacity of 475 Fifteen regional and community jail contracts with a total capacity of 157 beds 4

Increasing Non-Violent As of June 30, 2002 As of June 30, 2014 Non- Violent 48% Violent 52% Non- Violent 64% Violent 36% * Violent Crimes include all crimes against a person and also includes registerable sex offenses. Alaska Department of Corrections 5

Increasing Length of Stay As of June 30, 2002 As of June 30, 2014 Alaska Department of Corrections 6

Increasing Female Population As of June 30, 2002 As of June 30, 2014 Percent of Offenders in Institutions by gender on June 30, 2002 Female 9.15% Percent of Offenders in Institutions by gender on June 30, 2014 Female 11.67% Male 90.85% Male 88.33% In 2002, females were less than 10% of the total offender population held in institutions. In 2014, the female offenders made up just under 12%. Since 2002, female population growth rate is nearly double the male population. Females are one of the highest growing populations in Corrections. Alaska Department of Corrections 6.00% 5.00% 4.00% 3.00% 2.00% 1.00% 0.00% Offender Growth Rate Since 2002 by Gender Male Growth Rate, 3.76% Female Growth Rate, 5.49% Average Annual Growth Since 2002 7

INCREASING UNSENTENCED POPULATION Sentenced and Unsentenced Offenders June 30, 2002 Sentenced and Unsentenced Offenders June 30, 2014 Unsentenced 27% Sentenced 73% Unsentenced 39% Sentenced 61% 8

Increasing Older Population 10 Year Change in Population by Age Group 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% 33.33% 38.80% 39.73% 2.42% 1.49% 40.19% 55.08% 49.60% 62.26% 21.05% 10.00% 20.00% 19 and under 6.82% 15.87% 20 24 25 29 30 34 35 39 40 44 45 49 50 54 55 59 60 64 65 and over TOTAL

FY 2014 Budget $21,075.0 6% $50,954.6 15% Secure Confinement Reformative Programs Supervised Release $261,167.7 79% 10

DOC Daily Costs Yearly Daily Institutions (hard beds) $ 52,070.90 $ 142.66 Community Residential Centers (soft beds) Electronic Monitoring (furlough) $ 32,583.55 $ 89.27 $ 8,278.20 $ 22.68 Probation & Parole $ 2,741.15 $ 7.51 11

Alaska Recidivism Rates 48% returned to prison due to new crimes or technical violations within one year of release Criminal Recidivism in Alaska, Alaska Judicial Council, Jan. 2007 12

DOC Reentry Process Getting Ready Institutional Phase Going Home Transitional Phase Staying Home Community Phase 13

Transitioning from Prison to the Community (TPC Model) PHASE 1: GETTING READY The institutional phase describes the details of events and responsibilities occurring during the inmate s imprisonment from admission until the point of eligibility for parole or release. 1. ASSESSMENT AND CLASSIFICATION: Measuring the offender s risks, needs, and strengths. 2. INMATE PROGRAMMING: Giving assignments to reduce risk, address need, and build on strengths. PHASE 2: GOING HOME The transitional phase begins before the inmate s target release date. In this phase, highly specific re-entry plans are created. 3. INMATE RELEASE PREPARATION: Developing strong, public safety-conscious parole plans. 4. RELEASE DECISION MAKING: Improving parole release guidelines. PHASE 3: STAYING HOME The community phase begins the moment the inmate is released from prison and continues until he/she is discharged from community supervision. 5. SUPERVISION & SERVICES: Providing flexible and firm supervision and services. 6. REVOCATION DECISION MAKING: Using graduated sanctions to respond to behavior. 7. DISCHARGE & AFTERCARE: Determining community responsibility to take over the case. 14

Institutional Phase Getting Ready 15

Bookings 43000 42000 41000 40000 39000 39318 40232 40710 40957 42074 41685 39684 39204 38000 37000 36000 35000 37903 37106 34000 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 16

1. Assessment & Classification Determines housing placement, and measures the inmate s risks, needs, and strengths Initial Screening Medical/Mental Health PREA Education Parenting Classification Housed by custody level at the appropriate facility Updated to place greater emphasis on behavior & programming 17

Primary Assessment LSI-SV LSI-R Secondary Assessments Sex Offender (STABLE,STATIC, BARR & ACUTE) Education (TABE) Career Scope Substance Abuse Mental Health Criminal Thinking Anger Management 18

Principles of Effective Correctional Intervention Principles Risk Principle Description Devote your time, energy and resources to moderate and high risk cases. Need Principle Target the criminogenic needs of moderate and high risk offenders (i.e. the dynamic risk factors that, when changed, will change the probability of an offender s recidivism). Responsivity Principle General: Design your efforts around behavioral and cognitivebehavioral techniques. Specific: Tailor your efforts to the individual abilities (strengths), style, culture and personality of the client. 19

Criminogenic Factors Anti-social values/beliefs/cognition Reduce anti-social cognition, recognize risky thinking and feelings. Anti-social companions Reduce association with criminals, enhance contact with pro-social peers. Anti-social personality or temperament Build problem solving, self management, anger management, and skills for coping with restless/aggressive energy. Family and/or marital Reduce conflict, build positive relationships and communication, enhance monitoring/supervision. 20

Substance abuse Reduce usage, reduce the supports for abuse behavior, enhance alternatives to abuse. Employment Provide employment seeking and keeping skills. Education Enhance performance rewards and satisfaction. Leisure and/or recreation Enhance involvement and satisfaction in prosocial activities. Sources: Adapted from Ed Latessa, University of Cincinnati/Gendreau and Andrews, 1990/PRI Effective Case Management Coaching Packet, CEPP, 2010 21

2. Inmate Programming Referrals are made to reduce the individual s risk, address identified needs and build on strengths Criminal Attitudes Program Education/GED Parenting Vocational Programming Anger Management Substance Abuse Mental Health Other 22

Transitional Phase Going Home 23

3. Inmate Release Preparation Offender Management Plan Individualized for each inmate and is developed based on their risk, needs, and strengths. Concise guide for the inmates and staff. Ultimately maps out the inmate s transition from an institution back into the community. 24

Community In-Reach Housing Employment & Job Skills Education & Vocational Behavioral Health Healthcare Transportation Financial Planning Public Assistance Benefits Veteran Benefits Alaska Native American Indian Personal Identification Family Reunification Other 25

4. Release Decision Making Release Options CRC Electronic Monitoring Community Placement (Transitional Housing, Residential Treatment) Probation is ordered by the Court. The judge can order the offender be placed on supervision in the community, after release from incarceration. Parole is approved through the Parole Board. Discretionary Parole: allows offenders early release from incarceration under community supervision. Mandatory Parole: allows offenders to spend 1/3 of their incarceration (good-time) in the community under supervision. 26

Inmate Releases 90.00% 80.00% 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% Probation Parole Discharged Informal Probation Other 2002 13.06% 78.80% 7.82% 0.32% 2013 24.07% 53.20% 22.06% 0.67% 27

Community Phase Staying Home 28

5. Supervision & Services 13 field offices and 155 staff positions Overall caseloads have increased 36.62%, since FY 2002 Since FY 2002, the Probation & Parole Alaska Native population has grown by 28.47%, while Non-Natives grew by 39.78%. Probationers and Parolees age 45 and older have experienced an increase of 78.51%; while those ages 20-34 increased by 48.18%. 29

6. Revocation Decision Making Probation & Parole violations continue to be near the top of readmissions to prison Supervision strategy has shifted from enforcement (monitoring and surveillance) to focusing on reentry (greater collaboration and successful outcomes). Future efforts will incorporate graduated sanctions and be linked to levels of risk. 30

Probation & Parole Completion 65.01% 66.41% 45.23% 48.57% 52.41% FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 31

Recidivism Reduction 66.50% 66.00% 66.03% 65.50% 65.00% 64.50% 65.08% 64.15% 64.57% 64.00% 63.50% 63.00% 62.50% 62.00% 63.54% 63.19% 61.50% FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 32

7. Discharge & Aftercare Determining community partners who will be responsible for overseeing the case. This includes when there is no court, DOC or other criminal justice involvement. Need to look at structure, resources, gaps, and develop an overall plan to target continued reduction in recidivism. Reentry coalitions in Anchorage, Fairbanks, Dillingham, Kenai, Juneau & Mat-Su. 33

Justice Reinvestment 34