PRESENTER: Chris Blunk, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer

Similar documents
.?-& Approved as to Fonn. R. ZIEGLER, County Counsel THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMD~, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NUMBER:

15 1. John Yehall Chin Elementary Safe Routes to School Project;

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

Subject: Lifeline Cycle 4 Grant Funding

James Berg, Chief of Police Oliver Collins, Acting Captain, Operations Division

SUBJECT: FY15/16 BAY AREA URBAN AREAS SECURITY INITIATIVE GRANT EQUIPMENT REQUESTED: ROBOT

MERGING OF CITY OF NOVATO AND CITY OF SAN RAFAEL POLICE CRISIS RESPONSE UNITS

CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM & PLANNING COMMITTEE PLEASE NOTE CHANGE IN MEETING TIME AGENDA

RESOLUTION NO. 18-XX RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

APPLICANT S AGENT RESOLUTION TO BEGIN THE DISASTER RECOVERY PROCESS WITH FEMA AND CAL-OES FOR THE JANUARY 2017 STORMS

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT October 7, 2015 Page 2 of 6 Changes from Committee Background MTC began preparing its 2017 RTP Update earlier this yea

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Memorandum. Date: To: Prospective Project Sponsors From: Aprile Smith Senior Transportation Planner Through: Subject:

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

POLICIES RELATING TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING

SAFETY, SECURITY, AND TRANSIT PLANNING AND OPERATIONS AGENDA

RESOLUTION NUMBER 2877

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 5

Report to City Council RESOLUTION AMENDING THE SCOPE OF USE FOR THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION, A CALIFORNIA NON-PROFIT BENEFIT CORPORATION

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

CHAPTER 8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Key Topics: Legislative Requirements. 2. Legislative Intent and Application to San Francisco

Finance Committee October 18, 2011

A. The term "Charter" means the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco.

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Legislative Program

LIFELINE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM CALL FOR PROJECTS

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

City of Greenfield Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency. Meeting Agenda October 24, :00 P.M.

Long Range Transportation Plan

Climate Initiatives Program. Competitive Grants Guidelines METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Citizens Advisory Committee May 23, 2012

LAP Manual 7-1 February 2014 Compliance Assessment Program Requirements

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 399 Elmhurst Street Hayward, CA (510)

Memorandum. P:\Lifeline Program\2014 Lifeline Program\Call for Projects\LTP Cycle 4 Call - Memo.doc Page 1 of 7

THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS BOARD ACTION SUMMARY

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT FROM BRAD FOWLER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING SERVICES

OVERALL WORK PROGRAM. Process and Procedures

City of Fernley GRANTS MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

The next steps outlined at the end of this section are the key requirements as we can best envision them at this stage.

CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. John A. Russo City Manager. Date: May 7, 2013

miom ENT CN NEXT 0 PE POSTED MOTION

Grant: Safe Routes to Transit Initial Project Report for Ed Roberts Campus

Memorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee

Staff Report. (925)

FISCAL & COMPLIANCE AUDITS

SAFETEA-LU. Overview. Background

February 22, Honorable Mayor and City Council TO: Public Works Department

Oakland Fund for Children and Youth Meeting of the Planning and Oversight Committee (POC)

SMART SCALE Policy Guide

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

RESOLUTION NO. -- The applicant, PPF OFF 100 West Walnut, LP ("Applicant"),

5310 GRANT APPLICATION

MAP-21 and Project Delivery: A Legal Perspective

Lifeline Transportation Program Cycle 5 Guidelines

March 11, 1999 Agenda: March 23, 1999

One Bay Area Grant (OBAG): Local Program Development - Criteria ACTION ITEM

MAP-21 and Its Effects on Transportation Enhancements

County Executive Office/Legislative Affairs. County of Orange Report on Grant Applications/Awards

FY 2015 Value Pricing Pilot Program Discretionary Grant Program

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT

August 9, Re: DBE Program Triennial Goal Concurrence - Recipient ID #1674. Dear Mr. Smith:

MEMORANDUM. February 12, Interagency Transit Committee Members and Interested Parties. Anthony Zepeda, Associate Regional Planner

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 12

INDEPENDENT AUDITING SERVICES

Memorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. between THE SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. and THE SAN FRANCISCO RECREATION AND PARK DEPARTMENT

CITY of Los ANGELES CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Module 2 Planning and Programming

Module 3 Advance Funding Agreements between the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and a Local Government (LG) for Transportation Projects

LUZERNE COUNTY COUNCIL WORK SESSION February 07, 2017 Council Meeting Room Luzerne County Courthouse 200 North River Street Wilkes-Barre, PA

PLANNING SERVICES MEMORANDUM

Metro REVISED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE JUNE 18, 2014

WHEREAS, the Transit Operator provides mass transportation services within the Madison Urbanized Area; and

STATEMENT OF The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

CITY OF Los ANGELES CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT FOR THE MADERA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

A RESOLUTION. amended plans for the East End METRORail Expansion which resulted in the redesign

County Transportation Infrastructure Fund Grant Program Implementation Procedures

Date: June 27, Board of Directors. Neil McFarlane

@Count Adminlstrato~s 51

DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION REPORT ON AUDIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

J:\2006\Memo Items\7 - July 2006\Lifeline Transportation Program FY0607.doc Page 2 of 5

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Downtown Retail Interior Improvement Award Program Application Packet

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Posey County Long Range Transportation Plan

MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. The Mayor and Members of the City Council

The proposed action and spending plan require City Council authorization.

Lee County Board Of County Commissioners Ageuda riolrr Sulumary ~turs~~eet~'u

INDIAN GAMING LOCAL COMMUNITY BENEFIT COMMITTEE

MAP-21: Overview of Project Delivery Provisions

Date SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE WILMINGTON OIL FIELD. Dear Vendor:

Authority Board March 26, 2013

CONSOLIDATED OPERATING ASSISTANCE GRANT AGREEMENT. For use with dotgrants Grant Applications

SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (TA) 1250 SAN CARLOS AVENUE, SAN CARLOS, CA MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 1, 2016

Transcription:

G-7 STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: September 26, 2017 TO: City Council FROM: Chris Blunk, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer PRESENTER: Chris Blunk, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer 922 Machin Avenue Novato, CA 94945 (415) 899-8900 FAX (415) 899-8213 www.novato.org SUBJECT: ACCEPT A $500,000 ONE BAY AREA GRANT FOR THE DOWNTOWN SMART PHASE III PROJECT BY ADOPTING A STANDARD METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE DOWNTOWN SMART STATION PHASE III PROJECT TO PROGRAM THE PROJECT INTO THE FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN REQUEST Accept a $500,000 One Bay Area (OBAG) Grant for the Downtown SMART Station Phase III Project by adopting a Standard Metropolitan Transportation Commission Resolution of Support for the Downtown SMART Phase III Project to program the project into the Federal Transportation Improvement Plan (FTIP). DISCUSSION The Downtown Novato SMART Station is being implemented in three phases: Phase I consisted of station infrastructure that would otherwise be in conflict with future SMART revenue service--phase I was not designed or constructed to be an operational train station. This work was completed in April of 2017 for a total cost of $2,400,000. Phase II includes the rail switches, electrical components, and other improvements required for the passenger train station to operate. Phase II work is estimated at $3,100,000 and construction is anticipated to occur between late-2017 and mid-2019. Phase III includes the development of the City-owned lot adjacent to the station. The final scope of work for Phase III will need to be clearly defined through a future public engagement process, but cost estimates from the original project proposal in 2014 included a parking lot, accessibility enhancements, site lighting, and landscaping work that ranged from $300,000- $500,000. During the process of fully funding the Downtown SMART Station Phase II project, the City was successful in receiving a commitment from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for an additional $500,000 worth of grant funding to be used toward the Phase III commuter lot improvements. This money will come to Novato from MTC in the form of an OBAG Grant, but will be made up of federal dollars administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) through cc17_171 1

either the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STP) or Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ). In order to participate in the OBAG program and receive the $500,000 grant, MTC requires a resolution of local support for the Downtown SMART Station Phase III Project and because the grant is comprised of federal dollars, the project must be programmed into the FTIP. MTC has requested that this project be programmed into the FTIP no later than October 1, 2017. If adopted, the resolution will allow Novato to accept the $500,000 OBAG grant by programming the project into the FTIP and securing the federal funds. PUBLIC OUTREACH Funding for the Downtown SMART Station Project, phases II and III, was discussed as a part of the fiscal year 17/18 CIP Budget workshops at the April 18 and May 9, 2017 City Council meetings. The Downtown SMART Station Phase II project funding plan discussion at the July 11, 2017 City Council meeting included conversation regarding the potential $500,000 OBAG grant for Phase III. A July 25, 2017 Capital Improvement Budget Amendment Resolution mentioned the $500,000 grant from MTC for Phase III improvements. FISCAL IMPACT By accepting the $500,000 OBAG grant, total funding available for the Downtown SMART Station Phase III Project will increase from the current balance of $88,566 to $588,566. Projects funded through the federal STP and CMAQ programs are reimbursed up to 88.53% for approved expenditures. For example, if the City of Novato spent $100,000 total on a federalized project, FHWA would reimburse the city for up to $88,540 of the costs incurred. Therefore, projects with federal dollars must have an equivalent local funding match of 11.47% to cover the costs that will not be reimbursed. The minimum local funding match for this $500,000 grant is $64,716.51, which is less than the available $88,566, so no additional city funds must be allocated to the project in order to accept the grant. If the Downtown SMART Station Phase III Project is reimbursed by FHWA for expenditures related to environmental documentation or preparation of project plans, but the project is cancelled and no improvements are ever constructed, the city would be responsible to repay FHWA for those reimbursements. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Standard Metropolitan Transportation Commission Resolution of Support. 2

ALTERNATIVES 1. Reject the $500,000 OBAG Grant, maintain current funding levels for the project. 2. Direct staff at City Council discretion. ATTACHMENT 1. Standard MTC Resolution of Support for the Downtown SMART Station Phase III Project 3

ATTACHMENT 1 G-7 1. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO RESOLUTION OF LOCAL SUPPORT RESOLUTION NO. AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDING ASSIGNED TO MTC AND COMMITTING ANY NECESSARY MATCHING FUNDS AND STATING ASSURANCE TO COMPLETE THE PROJECTS WHEREAS, the City of Novato (herein referred to as APPLICANT) is submitting an application to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for $500,000 in funding assigned to MTC for programming discretion, which includes federal funding administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and federal or state funding administered by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) such as Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STP) funding, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) funding, Transportation Alternatives (TA) set-aside/active Transportation Program (ATP) funding, and Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) funding (herein collectively referred to as REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING) for the Downtown SMART Station Phase III Project (PROJECT); and WHEREAS, the United States Congress from time to time enacts and amends legislation to provide funding for various transportation needs and programs, (collectively, the FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ACT) including, but not limited to the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STP) (23 U.S.C. 133), the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) (23 U.S.C. 149) and the Transportation Alternatives (TA) set-aside (23 U.S.C. 133); and WHEREAS, state statutes, including California Streets and Highways Code 182.6, 182.7, and 2381(a)(1), and California Government Code 14527, provide various funding programs for the programming discretion of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ACT, and any regulations promulgated thereunder, eligible project sponsors wishing to receive federal or state funds for a regionally-significant project shall submit an application first with the appropriate MPO, or RTPA, as applicable, for review and inclusion in the federal Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); and WHEREAS, MTC is the MPO and RTPA for the nine counties of the San Francisco Bay region; and WHEREAS, MTC has adopted a Regional Project Funding Delivery Policy (MTC Resolution No. 3606, revised) that sets out procedures governing the application and use of REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING; and WHEREAS, APPLICANT is an eligible sponsor for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING; and 4

WHEREAS, as part of the application for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING, MTC requires a resolution adopted by the responsible implementing agency stating the following: the commitment of any required matching funds; and that the sponsor understands that the REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING is fixed at the programmed amount, and therefore any cost increase cannot be expected to be funded with additional REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING; and that the PROJECT will comply with the procedures, delivery milestones and funding deadlines specified in the Regional Project Funding Delivery Policy (MTC Resolution No. 3606, revised); and the assurance of the sponsor to complete the PROJECT as described in the application, subject to environmental clearance, and if approved, as included in MTC's federal Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); and that the PROJECT will have adequate staffing resources to deliver and complete the PROJECT within the schedule submitted with the project application; and that the PROJECT will comply with all project-specific requirements as set forth in the PROGRAM; and that APPLICANT has assigned, and will maintain a single point of contact for all FHWA- and CTC-funded transportation projects to coordinate within the agency and with the respective Congestion Management Agency (CMA), MTC, Caltrans, FHWA, and CTC on all communications, inquires or issues that may arise during the federal programming and delivery process for all FHWA- and CTC-funded transportation and transit projects implemented by APPLICANT; and WHEREAS, that APPLICANT is authorized to submit an application for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, there is no legal impediment to APPLICANT making applications for the funds; and WHEREAS, there is no pending or threatened litigation that might in any way adversely affect the proposed PROJECT, or the ability of APPLICANT to deliver such PROJECT; and WHEREAS, APPLICANT authorizes its Executive Director, General Manager, or designee to execute and file an application with MTC for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the PROJECT as referenced in this resolution; and WHEREAS, MTC requires that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the MTC in conjunction with the filing of the application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the APPLICANT is authorized to execute and file an application for funding for the PROJECTS for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING under the FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ACT or continued funding; and be it further RESOLVED that APPLICANT will provide any required matching funds; and be it further RESOLVED that APPLICANT understands that the REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the project is fixed at the MTC approved programmed amount, and that any cost increases must be funded by the APPLICANT from other funds, and that APPLICANT does not expect any cost increases to be funded with additional REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING; and be it further 5

RESOLVED that APPLICANT understands the funding deadlines associated with these funds and will comply with the provisions and requirements of the Regional Project Funding Delivery Policy (MTC Resolution No. 3606, revised) and APPLICANT has, and will retain the expertise, knowledge and resources necessary to deliver federally-funded transportation and transit projects, and has assigned, and will maintain a single point of contact for all FHWA- and CTCfunded transportation projects to coordinate within the agency and with the respective Congestion Management Agency (CMA), MTC, Caltrans, FHWA, and CTC on all communications, inquires or issues that may arise during the federal programming and delivery process for all FHWA- and CTC-funded transportation and transit projects implemented by APPLICANT; and be it further RESOLVED that the PROJECT will be implemented as described in the complete application and in this resolution, subject to environmental clearance, and, if approved, for the amount approved by MTC and programmed in the federal TIP; and be it further RESOLVED that APPLICANT has reviewed the PROJECT and has adequate staffing resources to deliver and complete the PROJECT within the schedule submitted with the project application; and be it further RESOLVED that PROJECT will comply with the requirements as set forth in MTC programming guidelines and project selection procedures for the PROGRAM; and be it further RESOLVED that APPLICANT is an eligible sponsor of REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING funded projects; and be it further RESOLVED that APPLICANT is authorized to submit an application for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the PROJECT; and be it further RESOLVED that there is no legal impediment to APPLICANT making applications for the funds; and be it further RESOLVED that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might in any way adversely affect the proposed PROJECT, or the ability of APPLICANT to deliver such PROJECTS; and be it further RESOLVED that APPLICANT authorizes its Executive Director, General Manager, City Manager, or designee to execute and file an application with MTC for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the PROJECT as referenced in this resolution; and be it further RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution will be transmitted to the MTC in conjunction with the filing of the application; and be it further RESOLVED that the MTC is requested to support the applications for the PROJECT described in the resolution, and if approved, to include the PROJECT in MTC's federal TIP upon submittal by the project sponsor for TIP programming. * * * * * * 6

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Novato, Marin County, California, at a meeting thereof, held on the 26th day of September, 2017, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers City Clerk of the City of Novato Approved as to form: City Attorney of the City of Novato 7

Instructions for Using the Resolution of Local Support A project sponsor receiving Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STP), Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ), Active Transportation Program (ATP), Regional Improvement Program (RIP), or other regional discretionary funds must adopt a resolution of local support prior to grant funds being added to the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The template to be used is found on the MTC website: http://mtc.ca.gov/our-work/fund-invest/federal-funding/obag-2 Sponsors should always use the template posted on the website to ensure they have the latest version. The sponsor may not make changes to the template with the exception of format changes or additional language to suit the jurisdiction s resolution conventions. These changes may not modify or condition / limit the MTC resolution language. If your legal counsel feels strongly about making language changes given specific circumstances surrounding a project, he/she needs to discuss these with the MTC General Counsel. The three bulleted statements on page 2 of the resolution that apply to transit, highway, and RTIP projects may be deleted, if they do not apply. After a project sponsor has adopted a resolution of local support for a project, it does not need to go back to the board if the project subsequently receives additional grants from the above fund sources, unless the project scope has changed significantly. If there are scope changes the sponsor should consult with MTC programming staff. The resolution of local support must be transmitted to MTC when a project / grant funds are added to the TIP. The sponsor will attach a PDF of the adopted resolution to the Fund Management System (FMS) application when the sponsor requests a TIP amendment. A schedule containing upcoming due dates for TIP revisions can be found at: http://mtc.ca.gov/our-work/fund-invest/tip/tip-revisions-and-amendments If you have further questions regarding the resolution please contact the following MTC staff: Mallory Atkinson (STP/CMAQ funds) at matkinson@mtc.ca.gov or 415-778-6793 Kenneth Kao (ATP/RIP funds) at kkao@mtc.ca.gov or 415-778-6768 Adam Crenshaw (TIP and FMS) at acrenshaw@mtc.ca.gov or 415-778-6794 8