Health Information Technology use in Iowa Long- Term Care Facilities: A Study for Iowa e-health

Similar documents
Health Information Technology use in Iowa Radiology Facilities: A Study for Iowa e-health

Health Information Technology use in Iowa Medical Laboratories: A Study for Iowa e-health

Iowa Health Information Technology and Meaningful Use Landscape in 2015

First Look at Iowa's Medicaid Expansion: How Well Did Members Transition to the Iowa Health & Wellness Plan from IowaCare

Background and Context:

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Survey of Registrants 2015 Summary of Findings

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL INCIDENT- BASED REPORTING SYSTEM IN IOWA

2004 HIMSS NATIONAL HEALTH INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE SURVEY. July 21, 2004

PCMH 2014 Recognition Checklist

HIQA s Medication Safety Monitoring Programme in Public Acute Hospitals. One Year Later

AMIA Public Policy and Government Relations Update

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

HIE/HIO Organizations Supporting Meaningful Use (MU) Stage 2 Goals Q Update from 2013 HIE Survey Participants

Medicaid and HIT: EHR s s for Medicaid Providers

Practice Transformation: Patient Centered Medical Home Overview

U.S. Healthcare Problem

Moving HIT and Meaningful Use

Behavioral Health Information Network of Arizona

UPDATE ON MEANINGFUL USE. HITECH Stimulus Act of 2009: CSC Point of View

Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for December 6, 2016

Reducing Hospital Re-Admissions with Telemedicine & Medication Reconciliation The prescription for improved patient outcomes

OHA s Technology Strategic Initiative

Blue Button Use to Access and Share Health Record Information

The Journey to Meaningful Use: Where we were, where we are, and where we may be going

ONC Cooperative Agreement HIE Program Update. Arizona Rural & Public Health Policy Forum January 19, 2012

Virginia s Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program

SHIN-NY 2020 Roadmap Extended Presentation. Val Grey Executive Director July 25, 2017

2011 Electronic Prescribing Incentive Program

Are physicians ready for macra/qpp?

Mental Health Care and OpenVista

Mental Health Care and OpenVista

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

Use of Information Technology in Physician Practices

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Appendix 5. PCSP PCMH 2014 Crosswalk

App nations: Start-ups, states and enterprises

HIE/HIO Organizations Supporting Meaningful Use (MU) Stage 2 Goals

WHICH PRESCRIPTIONS ARE 340B-ELIGIBLE

Connecticut Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program

Medical Assistant Credentialing Requirements for Your Client Practices. Eric Christensen Director of Client Services Healthcare Compliance Pros, Inc.

ACEP EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VIOLENCE POLL RESEARCH RESULTS

INSERT ORGANIZATION NAME

A strategy for building a value-based care program

HITECH Act. Overview and Estimated Timeline

Coutts Million Dollar Donors Report 2014 RUSSIA FINDINGS

Appendix. Final Version of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Survey Questionnaire

s n a p s h o t The State of Health Information Technology in California: Use Among Hospitals and Long Term Care Facilities

Copyright All Rights Reserved.

Multiple Value Propositions of Health Information Exchange

The results will also be used for public reporting for MN Community Measurement on mnhealthscores.org.

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

Elizabeth Mitchell December 1, Transforming Healthcare in an Uncertain Environment

Community Health Centers (CHCs)

1 Title Improving Wellness and Care Management with an Electronic Health Record System

Health Information Technology and Coordinating Care in Ohio

Provider Perspectives on Patient Information: Results of 2017 Survey. October 19, 2017

Overview of the Changes to the Meaningful Use Program Called for in the Proposed Inpatient Prospective Payment System Rule April 27, 2018

Health Current: Roadmap Practice Transformation using Information & Data

ORIGINAL STUDIES. Participants: 100 medical directors (50% response rate).

North Carolina. CAHPS 3.0 Adult Medicaid ECHO Report. December Research Park Drive Ann Arbor, MI 48108

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

PCSP 2016 PCMH 2014 Crosswalk

Evidence-Based Practices to Optimize Prescriber Use of PDMPs

Health Information Exchange. Anne Dobbins, RN Operations Director Minnesota Health Information Exchange (MN HIE)

Copyright American Psychological Association INTRODUCTION

Eligible Professional Expansion Program (EP2) New York State Medicaid Meaningful Use Support

Request for Information NJ Health Information Network. State of New Jersey. New Jersey HIT Coordinators Office. Request for Information

WHO SHARES? A look at the status of HIT and HIE in Arkansas

Performance Improvement & Analytics. Broward Health - Coral Springs Medical Center Case Study

Sharing health information electronically eliminates the need for faxing, copying and handcarrying your health record from provider to provider.

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

A Framework for Evaluating Electronic Health Records Overview - Applying to the Davies Ambulatory Awards Program Revised May 2012

Roll Out of the HIT Meaningful Use Standards and Certification Criteria

Results will be used for public reporting by MDH and MN Community Measurement on mnhealthscores.org.

Oklahoma Health Care Authority. ECHO Adult Behavioral Health Survey For SoonerCare Choice

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Tools for Providers. Clinical Care and Practice AdvancementElectronic Health Records (EHR)

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage Alternate Exclusions and/or Specifications

1. What are the requirements for Stage 1 of the HITECH Act for CPOE to qualify for incentive payments?

Patient Advocate Certification Board. Competencies and Best Practices required for a Board Certified Patient Advocate (BCPA)

SUBMIT/RECEIVE STATEWIDE ADMISSION, DISCHARGE, TRANSFER (ADT) NOTIFICATIONS

Kaiser Permanente: A leader in Health I.T.

WV MEDICAID PROVIDER WORKSHOPS & TRAINING SESSIONS. Amber Nary Business Development Manager

CAREER SERVICES USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Text-based Document. Advancing Nursing Informatics to Improve Healthcare Quality and Outcomes. Authors Sensmeier, Joyce E.

PHS Interventional Study Operational Approval Request

SEP Memorandum Report: "Trends in Nursing Home Deficiencies and Complaints," OEI

Seamless transition from paper to AHS EHR

Pharmacy Technicians and Interns: Charting New Territory

Patient Care: Case Study in EHR Implementation. With Help From Monkeys, Mice, and Penguins. Tom Goodwin, MHA MIT Medical Cambridge, MA March 2007

Meaningful Use Stage 2

REQUIREMENTS GUIDE: How to Qualify for EHR Stimulus Funds under ARRA

Deriving Value from a Health Information Exchange. HIMSS17 DA-CH Community Conference Healthix I New York I February 20, 2017

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

2015 Emergency Management and Preparedness Final Report

Current Use of EHRs among Missouri Community Behavioral Health Clinics Survey Results

HIPAA PRIVACY RULE: ACCESS TO PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION. A. General Right to Access Protected Health Information 1

Evaluation of the WHO Patient Safety Solutions Aides Memoir

Transcription:

Health Policy 11-1-2010 Health Information Technology use in Iowa Long- Term Care Facilities: A Study for Iowa e-health Damiano C. Peter Ki Park Kristi Law Copyright 2010 Public Policy Center, The Hosted by Iowa Research Online. For more information please contact: lib-ir@uiowa.edu.

About ¼ of Long- Term Care facilities reported using an electronic health record A study for Iowa e- Health Background Iowa e-health is a public and private collaboration that seeks to improve health care quality, safety and efficiency through the use of health information technology (HIT). This includes electronic health records (EHRs) to collect and store patient health information, and a statewide health information exchange (HIE) to share health records across the boundaries of individual care settings. To better understand HIT use by a variety of health care provider types, Iowa e- Health, in collaboration with the University of Iowa Public Policy Center (UI PPC), conducted an assessment of HIT issues November 2010 Health Information Technology use in Iowa Long-Term Care Facilities facing health care providers in Iowa. The current effort included five health provider settings: 1) home health, 2) longterm care, 3) pharmacies, 4) laboratories, and 5) radiology centers. This Brief presents information about the Long-Term Care (LTC) Facility Assessment. The assessments gathered information about a range of HIT topics including: 1) provider health IT capabilities and preparedness to participate in a statewide HIE; 2) preferences for types of high value clinical data exchange or HIE services; and 3) benefits and barriers to HIT adoption. Methodology An on-line survey assessment was used to evaluate the use of HIT in Iowa LTC facilities. The survey instrument was developed in collaboration with LTC content experts from the e-health Assessment Subcommittee and then pilot tested with several Iowa LTC facilities. A comprehensive list of Iowa LTC facilities was compiled based on lists from the Iowa Dept. of Inspections and Appeals, the Iowa Foundation for Medical Care, and the Iowa Medicaid Enterprise. On-line resources were then used to identify contact information for the facilities and to obtain the email address for the person most knowledgeable about HIT in the facilities. The on-line survey process included: 1) An e-vite from IDPH Director Tom Newton requesting participation in the assessment survey (including a link to the website for completion of the survey) 2) A follow-up email from UI PPC requesting participation 3) Telephone follow-up calls to nonrespondents from the UI Social Science Research Center to identify that the email reached the most appropriate person 4) Closing of the survey process after about 6 weeks. The data were then cleaned and the analyses began Participation Rates Of the 453 long-term care facilities identified in Iowa, 90 completed a usable survey, for a 20% participation rate. While the participating facilities were well distributed around the state, they are likely to be biased toward those more interested in the topic of HIT (not necessarily more likely to have electronic systems). Thus, we suggest the results from this assessment be used to evaluate potential trends rather than focusing on exact percentages for any particular questions.

Long-Term Care Assessment Page 2 of 4 Long Term Care Facilities and EHRs About one quarter of LTC facilities reported using an electronic health record (EHR) (Table 1). Larger facilities were significantly more likely to be using an EHR. Table 1. Type of LTC facility by EHR use Non-EHR EHR Independent 37 (80%) 9 (20%) Affiliated 23 (70) 10 (30%) Other 3 (75%) 1 (25%) Total 63 (76%) 20 (24%) Continuity of care documents, eligibility verification, and prescriptions, medication management and alerts were among the types of information deemed most valuable for sharing by LTC facilities The most common functions of EHR in LTC facilities were: Patient identification information (95%) Patient medication (95%) and allergy (90%) lists Patient problems, risks and conditions (79%) Patient plan of care (79%) Seven facilities were currently able to share some information with other providers electronically. Perceived benefits of EHR in Iowa LTC facilities Most common potential benefits: Billing and coding Timely availability of clinical information Accuracy of clinical information Patient monitoring and follow-up Patient safety Communication with clinicians Most valuable information for sharing with other providers via an EHR: Continuity of Care Documents, Eligibility verification Prescriptions, medication management and alerts Management in transition Discharge summary

Long-Term Care Assessment Page 3 of 4 Future uses of an EHR in Iowa LTC facilities Among those without an EHR Most were not planning to invest in an EHR in the next two years The main reasons were: Financial cost (i.e. initial cost of product installation and operational cost) Support staffing Data security Among those with an EHR Most Iowa LTC facilities without an EHR system were not planning to install one in the next 2 years About half were very likely to invest in their system in next two years Cost of new modules and the ongoing operational costs were main concerns o Slightly less likely to be concerned about costs than those without an EHR Health Information Exchange and LTC facilities Interest in participating in a Health Information Exchange (HIE) Half were very interested (26%) or somewhat interested (29%) in participating in an HIE (Table 2). Table 2. LTC facilities interest in participating in an HIE Frequency Valid percent 1 Very interested 22 26% 2 Somewhat interested 25 29% 3 Not at all interested 8 9% 4 Don't know yet 30 35% Total 85 100% Major concerns with participating in a HIE Initial cost of product/installation Operational cost of EHR system Potential liability Client privacy Among the barriers to installing an EHR system, LTC facilities listed concerns about financial cost, staff support and data security

Long-Term Care Assessment Page 4 of 4 Summary Overall, EHR use in Iowa LTC facilities was relatively low with about one in four facilities reporting the current use of an electronic health record. At this point, the more common functions for their EHRs were the collection of information rather than the sharing of information electronically. Improved care quality (i.e., availability and accuracy of clinical information, monitoring and follow up and patient safety), provider communication and billing coding were deemed as the benefits of an EHR. Costs (initial and operational) were the biggest concerns among both those with and without an EHR, though those with an EHR were more likely to indicate willingness to invest financial resources in the near future. About 1/2 of the LTC facilities had interest in participating in a HIE with potential costs, liabilities and client privacy the greatest concerns if they were to move in this direction. Iowa e-health For more information on this topic contact: Public Policy Center Peter C. Damiano Director 209 South Quadrangle Iowa City, IA 52242 peter-damiano@uiowa.edu Phone: 319.335.6800 Fax: 319.335.6801 Iowa e-health is a public/private collaboration designed to improve health care quality and efficiency through the use of HIT. For more information, contact: Iowa e-health Email: ehealth@idph.state.ia.us Website: www.iowaehealth.org Toll-Free Number: 866-924-4636 Iowa Department of Public Health, Office of Health IT Other research reports are available for download on our Website: About these policy briefs The 's Public Policy Center s Policy Briefs are designed to provide our research findings in a succinct and accessible format. The nature of the Briefs does not allow for extensive explanation regarding the methods used in our research. More information about specific methodologies used in any particular study can be obtained by contacting researchers at the Center and/or by downloading reports from our website. We hope you find these policy briefs helpful to your discourse on some of the most challenging societal issues. http://ppc.uiowa.edu About the Public Policy Center The 's Public Policy Center s mission is to provide policymakers with information that can make our lives and communities thrive in sustainable ways through academic research. The vibrant Center that brings together researchers from a variety of fields and disciplines to impact policy at the local, state and national level through sound academic scholarship.