- PROTOCOL V - (As adopted by the First Conference at its second plenary meeting on 5 November 2007)

Similar documents
SUMMARY COVER PAGE OF THE ANNUAL REPORT OF CCW PROTOCOL V 1. Canada. REPORTING PERIOD: 01/04/2012 To 31/03/2013 (dd/mm/yyyy) (dd/mm/yyyy)

UN/CCW Protocol V Norway 2009

HIGH CONTRACTING PARTY: Republic of Lithuania NATIONAL POINT(S) OF CONTACT:

- PROTOCOL V - (As adopted by the First Conference at its second plenary meeting on 5 November 2007) REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA

FSC.EMI/174/17 30 May ENGLISH only

REPORTING FORMS COVER PAGE

Explosive Remnants of War (ERW) A Quick Look Threat Analysis

Battle Area Clearance (BAC): Guadalcanal Posted At : October 31, :24 PM Posted By : Admin Related Categories: UXO Guest Author Article

OFFICE OF WEAPONS REMOVAL AND ABATEMENT BUREAU OF POLITICAL-MILITARY AFFAIRS

EOD Courses ATOM Training Ltd Courses 2018

Range Clearance in Contingency

Permanent Mission of Montenegro to the UN, OSCE and other International Organizations in Vienna

REPORTING FORMS COMPLIANCE

IMAS Second Edition 01 October 2008 Amendment 4, June 2013

EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL

- PROTOCOL V - (As adopted by the First Conference at its second plenary meeting on 5 November 2007) ALBANIA

IMAS First Edition 01 September 2007 Amendment 3, June 2013

PROTOCOL V PREVENTIVE MEASURES REGARDING EXPLOSIVE STORAGE DURING MANUFACTURING AND DISPOSAL

COVER PAGE OF THE ANNUAL ARTICLE 7 REPORT

IMAS Second Edition 01 October 2008 Amendment 5, October 2014

ESTONIA. National annual report

REPORT BY THE STATES PARTIES TO THE AMENDED PROTOCOL- II TO THE CCW COVERING PERIOD FROM 16 AUGUST 2006 TO 15 AUGUST 2007 DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION

Ministry of Defence Sudan Mine Action Programme IMSMA Monthly Report- February 2017

Chapter III ARMY EOD OPERATIONS

Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Procedures

HUNTSVILLE. Chief, Military Munitions Design Center Ordnance and Explosives Directorate. Center, Huntsville 21 November 2013

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Construction Industry

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF' DEF'ENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NOV

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO, VIRGINIA

- PROTOCOL V - (As adopted by the First Conference at its second plenary meeting on 5 November 2007) BELGIUM

Handicap International is looking for : Technical Advisor - Libya

Newsletter JANUARY. LMA BAC Operators. HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE PROGRAM JANUARY APRIL 2011

Ordnance Holdings, Inc. (OHI)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Environmental and Explosives Safety Management on Operational Ranges Outside the United States

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

UNMAS LIBYA: Humanitarian Mine Action and Arms and Ammunition Management

Summary Report for Individual Task D-3100 Implement the Munitions Rule (MR) Status: Approved

Provisional Reporting Formats for Article 13 para 4 and Article 11 para 2. AUSTRIA. Mr. Wolfgang Banyai

UXO HOTSPOTS CLEARANCE IN ALBANIA

A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.2

DOD DIRECTIVE E EXPLOSIVES SAFETY MANAGEMENT (ESM)

Subj: EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REVIEW, OVERSIGHT, AND VERIFICATION OF MUNITIONS RESPONSES

Eighth United States Army Korea Regulation United States Army Installation Management Agency Korea Region Office. 10 October 2006.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Military Munitions Support Services (M2S2) Overview

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

U.S. Army Ammunition Management in the Pacific Theater

MINISTRY FOR THE KOSOVO SECURITY FORCE

Sinai II Accords, Egyptian-Israeli Disengagement Agreement (4 September 1975)

AMMUNITION UNITS CONVENTIONAL AMMUNITION ORDNANCE COMPANIES ORDNANCE COMPANY, AMMUNITION, CONVENTIONAL, GENERAL SUPPORT (TOE 09488L000) FM 9-38

Commentary to the HPCR Manual on International Law Applicable to Air and Missile Warfare

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide

DOD MANUAL DOD MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. DoD Executive Agent for the Unexploded Ordnance Center of Excellence (UXOCOE)

Ammunition Management and Education in the Croatian Armed Forces

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Continuation of Essential DoD Contractor Services During Crises

REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA. LIBERIA NATIONAL COMMISSION ON SMALL ARMSAND LIGHT WEAPONS (LiNCSA)

Government of Azerbaijan

PORTFOLIO OF SPECIALIST TRAINING COURSES

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

National Armed Forces Law

CHAD CHAD ARTICLE 5 DEADLINE: 1 JANUARY 2020 (NOT ON TRACK TO MEET DEADLINE) PROGRAMME PERFORMANCE For 2015 For 2014

*Note: An update of the English text of this Act is being prepared. Text in Bulgarian: Закон за отбраната и въоръжените сили на Република България

APPENDIX: FUNCTIONAL COMMUNITIES Last Updated: 21 December 2015

Enhancing Multinational Force Capability through Standardization and Interoperability

Conventional Weapons Destruction Program

THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release December 5, 2016

MCO C465 AUG MARINE CORPS ORDER From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List

ASSEMBLY 36TH SESSION

EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL OPERATIONS DECEMBER 2011

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Assistance. FOR people affected by armed conflict and other situations of violence

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

DEC CCO 3571.lA 3B. COMBAT CENTER ORDER 3571.lA. From: To: Commanding General Distribution List. Subj: EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL

Ammunitions and Weapons Surplus Treatment in the Croatian Armed Forces

E S F 8 : Public Health and Medical Servi c e s

Air Force Research Laboratory

ALLIANCE MARITIME STRATEGY

Project Design Advance. Nauru: Port Development Project. Project Number: December 2015

2013 Libya Portfolio of Humanitarian Mine Action, Arms and Ammunition Management Projects Mid-Year Review Updated 8 July 2013

Supplement 2 Department of Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS) Government Contract Provisions

MAG CWMD Global Update December 2010

REDUCING THE LIKELIHOOD OF UNPLANNED EXPLOSIONS AT MUNITIONS SITES (UEMS)

Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Executing Navy s Maritime Strategy

Somalia Summary Graphs. Project By Agency. Organization Type UN International NGO

Permanent Mission of Honduras to the United Nations

- an updated version of the list of EU embargoes on arms exports, (Annex I);

MINE ACTION SUB-CLUSTER

Civilian Deaths & Injuries January to September

MAG CWMD Global Update February 2011

Technical Paper 18 1 September 2016 DDESB. Minimum Qualifications for Personnel Conducting Munitions and Explosives of Concern-Related Activities

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Management of Environmental Compliance at Overseas Installations

RANGE OF MILITARY OPERATIONS

FUTURE U.S. NAVY AND USCG OPERATIONS IN THE ARCTIC

Defense Surplus Equipment Disposal: Background Information

Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) for the Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC). An EIS/OEIS is con

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Technical Paper 18 1 September 2015 DDESB. Minimum Qualifications for Personnel Conducting Munitions and Explosives of Concern-Related Activities

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Single Manager Responsibility for Military Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology and Training (EODT&T)

Transcription:

REPORTING FORMS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 10, PARAGRAPH 2 (b) OF THE PROTOCOL AND THE DECISION OF THE FIRST CONFERENCE OF THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES TO PROTOCOL V (As adopted by the First Conference at its second plenary meeting on 5 November 2007) HIGH CONTRACTING PARTY: NATIONAL POINT(S) OF CONTACT (Organization, telephones, fax, e-mail): Elsa Mouelhi-Rondeau Second Secretary, Disarmament / Peace and Security The Permanent Mission of to the Office of the United Nations in Geneva Foreign Affairs and International Trade Telephone: +41 22 919 9243 E mail: Elsa.Mouelhi-Rondeau@international.gc.ca DATE OF SUBMISSION: (dd/mm/yyyy) This information can be available to other interested parties and relevant organizations YES NO Partially, only the following forms: A B C D E F G H I

FORM A: Steps taken to implement Article 3 of the Protocol: Clearance, removal or destruction of explosive remnants of war Steps taken to implement the provisions of Article 3: During the reporting period, the Canadian Armed Forces conducted no new operations involving Explosive Remnants of War (ERW). When conducting operations, the Canadian Armed Forces establish Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) that reflect the responsibility to track the use of munitions as well as the clearance or destruction of unexploded ordnance, notwithstanding the increased risks associated with hostilities. As far as security conditions and operational tasking in the Canadian area of operations allowed, the Canadian Armed Forces destroyed ERWs. recognizes the risk that ERW places upon local populations, whose protection is key to the success of any operation. Removing ERW that could pose an immediate risk to local populations is a critical piece of s role in protecting the local population, and thus removing such ERW becomes an important consideration for any mission.

FORM B: Steps taken to implement Article 4 of the Protocol: Recording, retaining and transmission of information Steps taken to implement the provisions of Article 4 and the Technical Annex: Canadian Armed Forces SOPs, in line with NATO procedures, necessitate the recording of all uses of explosive ordnance. Multiple records capture both the initial request and eventual use (including type and location) of the munitions. Separate situation reports provide a narrative of each incident and separately capture the use of explosive ordnance. Further, an entirely separate logistics system tracks the movement of ammunition before and as it is expended. Thus, records on the use and storage of explosive ordnance are maintained in Department of National Defence information systems. These systems are already established and integrated with Canadian Armed Forces SOPs. Current Canadian Armed Forces recording and reporting allows for the provisions of Article 4, specifically with regards to release of information to third parties, to be carried out upon the cessation of hostilities. In Afghanistan, this information was made available to ISAF partners on the transfer of national responsibility for territories as part of the evolution of the ISAF mission.

FORM C: Steps taken to implement Article 5 of the Protocol: Other precautions for the protection of the civilian population, individual civilians and civilian objects from the risks and effects of explosive remnants of war Steps taken to implement the provisions of Article 5 and the Technical Annex: The Canadian Armed Forces implement control measures during operations to minimize any risk to the civilian population from ERW. These control measures can include physically separating the civilian population from areas where munitions covered under this protocol are to be deployed; education and/or notice to the local population in advance of the use of these munitions; and survey of the area after the use of these munitions in order to identify, mark and dispose of ERW. National Defence maintains the Unexploded Explosive Ordnance (UXO) and Legacy Sites Program. It consists of educating the public on the dangers of UXO, and maintaining a national data base of legacy sites within where UXO may still remain due to previous military operations, training or weapons testing, as well as wartime action along 's coasts and incidents involving ships, planes or vehicles carrying ammunition and explosives. The information is available to the public through the following web site: http://www.forces.gc.ca/assets/uxocanada.html

FORM D: Steps taken to implement Article 6 of the Protocol: Provisions for the protection of humanitarian missions and organizations from the effects of explosive remnants of war Steps taken to implement the provisions of Article 6: During the reporting period, the Canadian Armed Forces conducted no new operations involving ERW.

FORM E: Steps taken to implement Article 7 of the Protocol: Assistance with respect to existing explosive remnants of war Steps taken to implement the provisions of Article 7: treats the provision of assistance for existing ERW in exactly the same manner as it does the provision of assistance under the terms of Article 8. As a NATO partner, the Canadian Armed Forces remains ready to provide assistance, in line with the provisions of Article 7, subject to the availability of suitable resources. In August 2013, the Canadian Armed Forces participated in Operation Open Spirit 13 as part of a TO partnership for peace to identify and dispose of underwater threats that could pose a problem to the safety of navigation in the east Baltic Sea. The operation covered an area of 24 square nautical miles, finding and identifying 134 contacts and pronouncing the area safe for navigation. No ERW were found. In November 2013, the Canadian Armed Forces participated the Australian Defence Force's ration Render Safe 13, a biennial ERW operation in the South Pacific. This year's operation saw the CAF conduct surface and subsurface ERW operations in the Solomon Islands. The Canadian Armed Forces assisted the F in clearing 2891 ERW. The CAF is planning to participate in Op Open Spirit 14 (Baltic Sea) and Op Render Safe 14 (Papua New Guinea) in 2014.

FORM F: Steps taken to implement Article 8 of the Protocol: Co-operation and assistance Steps taken to implement the provisions of Article 8: FORM F(a): Steps taken by States which have ERW victims to implement the relevant provisions of Article 8(2): Victim Assistance Steps taken to implement the relevant provisions of Article 8(2): Other relevant information, guided by the Plan of Action on Victim Assistance:

FORM G: Steps taken to implement Article 9 of the Protocol: Generic preventive measures Steps taken to implement the provisions of Article 9 and the Technical Annex:

FORM H: Steps taken to implement Article 11 of the Protocol: Compliance Steps taken to implement the provisions of Article 11: In the Canadian Armed Forces implementation of the Protocol, particular attention has been paid to operational procedures and the Law of Armed Conflict training program to ensure compliance. At this stage, the requirements of Protocol V have been incorporated in appropriate training and SOP, and the update of doctrine manuals takes place as part of the normal review cycle. Overall, all Canadian Armed Forces procedures continue to be in line with or exceed the operational requirements of Protocol V.

FORM I: Other relevant matters