Selection & Retention Of State Judges. Methods from Across the Country

Similar documents

TABLE 3c: Congressional Districts with Number and Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to-Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

TABLE 3b: Congressional Districts Ranked by Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to- Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD

5 x 7 Notecards $1.50 with Envelopes - MOQ - 12

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Index of religiosity, by state

2015 State Hospice Report 2013 Medicare Information 1/1/15

Voter Registration and Absentee Ballot Deadlines by State 2018 General Election: Tuesday, November 6. Saturday, Oct 27 (postal ballot)

MAP 1: Seriously Delinquent Rate by State for Q3, 2008

STATE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONS $ - LISTED NEXT PAGE. TOTAL $ 88,000 * for each contribution of $500 for Board Meeting sponsorship

Rutgers Revenue Sources

PRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Joseph Stefko, Director of Public Finance, ;

Sentinel Event Data. General Information Copyright, The Joint Commission

Interstate Pay Differential

Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report

Sentinel Event Data. General Information Q Copyright, The Joint Commission

2016 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION

Is this consistent with other jurisdictions or do you allow some mechanism to reinstate?

Current Medicare Advantage Enrollment Penetration: State and County-Level Tabulations

Statutory change to name availability standard. Jurisdiction. Date: April 8, [Statutory change to name availability standard] [April 8, 2015]

FORTIETH TRIENNIAL ASSEMBLY

*ALWAYS KEEP A COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ATTENDANCE FOR YOUR RECORDS IN CASE OF AUDIT

HOME HEALTH AIDE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, DECEMBER 2016

Percentage of Enrolled Students by Program Type, 2016

In the District of Columbia we have also adopted the latest Model business Corporation Act.

Table 6 Medicaid Eligibility Systems for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January Share of Determinations

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2017

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2016

Interstate Turbine Advisory Council (CESA-ITAC)

States Ranked by Annual Nonagricultural Employment Change October 2017, Seasonally Adjusted

EXHIBIT A. List of Public Entities Participating in FEDES Project

Table 8 Online and Telephone Medicaid Applications for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017

Weights and Measures Training Registration

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2014

FY 2014 Per Capita Federal Spending on Major Grant Programs Curtis Smith, Nick Jacobs, and Trinity Tomsic

HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETICS PARTICIPATION SURVEY

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2016 Q1 Update

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2017Q2 Update

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2017Q4 Update

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2018Q1 Update

Colorado River Basin. Source: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation

CRMRI White Paper #3 August 2017 State Refugee Services Indicators of Integration: How are the states doing?

F O R E S T R I V E R M A R I N E

State Authority for Hazardous Materials Transportation

HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data December 2016

YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH IS WORSENING AND ACCESS TO CARE IS LIMITED THERE IS A SHORTAGE OF PROVIDERS HEALTHCARE REFORM IS HELPING

HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data September 2014

National Collegiate Soils Contest Rules

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Date: 5/25/2012. To: Chuck Wyatt, DCR, Virginia. From: Christos Siderelis

U.S. Army Civilian Personnel Evaluation Agency

Fiscal Year 1999 Comparisons. State by State Rankings of Revenues and Spending. Includes Fiscal Year 2000 Rankings for State Taxes Only

Rankings of the States 2017 and Estimates of School Statistics 2018

Name: Date: Albany: Jefferson City: Annapolis: Juneau: Atlanta: Lansing: Augusta: Lincoln: Austin: Little Rock: Baton Rouge: Madison: Bismarck:

national assembly of state arts agencies

Larry DeBoer Purdue University September Real GDP Growth. Real Consumption Spending Growth

STATE AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS SUPPORTING S. 744 AS APPROVED BY THE SENATE AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE

Senior American Access to Care Grant

Revenues, Expenses, and Operating Profits of U. S. Lotteries, FY 2002

All Approved Insurance Providers All Risk Management Agency Field Offices All Other Interested Parties

Introduction. Current Law Distribution of Funds. MEMORANDUM May 8, Subject:

Alabama Okay No Any recruiting or advertising without authorization is considered out of compliance. Not authorized

STATE ARTS AGENCY GRANT MAKING AND FUNDING

NAFCC Accreditation Annual Update

Percent of Population Under Age 65 Uninsured, 2013, 2014, and 2015

November 24, First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002

How North Carolina Compares

Weekly Market Demand Index (MDI)

Economic Freedom of North America

Pipeline Safety Regulations and the Effects on Operator Qualification Programs. March 28, 2017

Charts* Chart 1: Alimony/Spousal Support Factors

NURSING HOME STATISTICAL YEARBOOK, 2015

CONNECTICUT: ECONOMIC FUTURE WITH EDUCATIONAL REFORM

Its Effect on Public Entities. Disaster Aid Resources for Public Entities

THE METHODIST CHURCH (U.S.)

2019 International Builder's Show

How North Carolina Compares

The Regional Economic Outlook

efiling for Self Represented Litigants (SRL s) A Practical Perspective

Tax Year 2017 CCH e-file QuickLook

Use of Medicaid to Support Early Intervention Services

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

RECERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

THE STATE OF GRANTSEEKING FACT SHEET

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION FACULTY SALARIES

Sharing of Data Between Agencies. Date: August 31, 2011 [ INSERT TOPIC NAME ] [ INSERT YEAR MONTH DD ]

National Joint TERT Initiative Overview

ANCHOR INSTITUTION STRATEGIES IN THE SOUTHEAST


2014 ACEP URGENT CARE POLL RESULTS

Transcription:

Selection & Retention Of State Judges Methods from Across the Country

Formal Methods of Selecting State Judges COURTS OF LAST RESORT............................. 3 INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURTS.................... 4 TRIAL COURTS OF GENERAL JURISDICTION............ 5 Informal Methods of Selecting State Judges COURTS OF LAST RESORT.............................. 6 INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURTS.................... 7 TRIAL COURTS OF GENERAL JURISDICTION............ 8 Methods of Retaining State Judges COURTS OF LAST RESORT............................. 9 INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURTS................... 10 TRIAL COURTS OF GENERAL JURISDICTION........... 11 NOTE: When all judges in a particular state are appointed by the governor (with or without assistance from a judicial nominating commission) or elected by the legislature, then what these charts label the informal method of selecting state judges is the same as the formal method of selecting state judges. On the other hand, when judges are elected by the voters, the informal method of selecting state judges is the method that is used to fill judicial vacancies that occur between scheduled elections. 2

FORMAL METHODS OF SELECTING STATE JUDGES: COURTS OF LAST RESORT Commission- (5) (9) (13) (21) Alaska California* South Carolina Alabama Arkansas Arizona Maine* Virginia Illinois Georgia Massachusetts* Louisiana Idaho Connecticut* New Hampshire* Kentucky Delaware* New Jersey* New Mexico Minnesota Florida North Carolina Hawaii* Montana Pennsylvania Maryland* New York* Rhode Island* * Vermont* A commission advises the governor, but the governor is not required by law to appoint a 3

FORMAL METHODS OF SELECTING STATE JUDGES: INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURTS Commission- Court (8) (11) (15) Alaska California* New Jersey South Carolina Alabama Arkansas Arizona * Virginia Illinois Georgia Massachusetts* Louisiana Idaho Connecticut* New Mexico Kentucky Florida North Carolina Hawaii* Minnesota Pennsylvania Maryland* New York Utah Rhode Island * A commission advises the governor, but the governor is not required by law to appoint a 4

FORMAL METHODS OF SELECTING STATE JUDGES: TRIAL COURTS OF GENERAL JURISDICTION Commission- (4) (14) (20) (15) Alaska Maine* South Carolina Alabama Arkansas Arizona Massachusetts* Virginia Arizona California New Hampshire* Illinois Florida Connecticut* New Jersey* Georgia Delaware* Idaho Hawaii* Louisiana Kentucky New Mexico Maryland New York North Carolina Minnesota Rhode Island* Pennsylvania Montana Vermont* NOTE: In the italicized states, judges of trial courts of general jurisdiction are selected and retained using more than one method, depending on the county in which the court sits. A commission advises the governor, but the governor is not required by law to appoint a 5

INFORMAL METHODS OF SELECTING STATE JUDGES: COURTS OF LAST RESORT Commission- Court (18) (0) (28) Alaska Alabama Illinois South Carolina Louisiana Arizona Arkansas Virginia California* Connecticut* Georgia Delaware* Maine* Florida Massachusetts* Hawaii* Idaho Kentucky Maryland* Montana* New Hampshire* New Mexico New York* Rhode Island* * Vermont* Minnesota New Hampshire* New Jersey* North Carolina Pennsylvania* * * Confirmation by the legislature or another entity is required. A commission advises the governor, but the governor is not required by law to appoint a 6

INFORMAL METHODS OF SELECTING STATE JUDGES: INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURTS Commission- Court (16) (0) (19) Alaska Alabama Illinois South Carolina Louisiana Arizona Arkansas New Jersey Virginia California* Connecticut* Georgia Florida * Hawaii* Massachusetts* Idaho Minnesota Kentucky North Carolina Maryland* Pennsylvania* * New Mexico New York * * Confirmation by the legislature or another entity is required. A commission advises the governor, but the governor is not required by law to appoint a 7

INFORMAL METHODS OF SELECTING STATE JUDGES: TRIAL COURTS OF GENERAL JURISDICTION Commission- Court (22) (0) (29) Alabama Alabama Illinois South Carolina Louisiana Alaska Arizona Virginia Arizona Arkansas California Connecticut* Georgia Delaware* Florida Hawaii* Maine* Idaho Massachusetts* Minnesota Kentucky Maryland Montana* New Mexico New York* Rhode Island* Vermont* New Hampshire* New Jersey* North Carolina Pennsylvania* * NOTE: In the italicized states, judges of trial courts of general jurisdiction are selected and retained using more than one method, depending on the county in which the court sits. * Confirmation by the legislature or another entity is required. A commission advises the governor, but the governor is not required by law to appoint a 8

METHODS OF RETAINING STATE JUDGES: COURTS OF LAST RESORT Retention Commision- / Life Commission Reelection/ Tenure (19) Reelection (19) Alaska Delaware* Connecticut* South Carolina Alabama Massachusetts (to 70) Arizona New York* Maine* Vermont Arkansas New Hampshire (to 70) California New Jersey* Virginia Georgia Rhode Island Florida Illinois Maryland New Mexico Pennsylvania Utah Idaho Kentucky Louisiana Minnesota Montana North Carolina Hawaii 9

METHODS OF RETAINING STATE JUDGES: INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURTS Retention Commision- / Life Commission Reelection/ Tenure (17) Reelection (16) Alaska New York Connecticut* South Carolina Alabama Massachusetts (to 70) Arizona Virginia Arkansas California Florida Illinois Maryland New Mexico Pennsylvania Utah Georgia Idaho Kentucky Louisiana Minnesota North Carolina Hawaii 10

METHODS OF RETAINING STATE JUDGES: TRIAL COURTS OF GENERAL JURISDICTION Retention Commision- / Life Commission Reelection/ Tenure (19) Reelection (20) Alaska Delaware* Connecticut* South Carolina Alabama Massachusetts (to 70) Arizona Maine* Vermont Arizona New Hampshire (to 70) California New Jersey* Virginia Arkansas Rhode Island Georgia Florida Idaho Kentucky Illinois Louisiana Maryland Minnesota New Mexico Montana Pennsylvania New York North Carolina Utah Hawaii NOTE: In the italicized states, judges of trial courts of general jurisdiction are selected and retained using more than one method, depending on the county in which the court sits. 11