SE8RET NAT IONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. NNSA Budget Update. November 5, SEe RET

Similar documents
FOUO P1 e Decisiona11Not Subjeet to Diselosu1 e under FOIA

Department of Energy's FY 2017 Nuclear Weapons Budget Request

Nuclear Weapon Stockpile Management

Differences Between House and Senate FY 2019 NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

Perspectives on the 2013 Budget Request and President Obama s Guidance on the Future of the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Program

Available electronically at 2

National Nuclear Security Administration

SEEKING A RESPONSIVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS INFRASTRUCTURE AND STOCKPILE TRANSFORMATION. John R. Harvey National Nuclear Security Administration

NNSA Misleading While Pushing Costly Nuclear Weapons Strategy

Issue Briefs. NNSA's '3+2' Nuclear Warhead Plan Does Not Add Up

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: NUCLEAR WEAPON MODERNIZATION FY 2012 OCO

Recommendations for the Nuclear Weapons Complex of the Future

Billion Dollar Boondoggles

Joint Statement for the Record

Nuclear Forces: Restore the Primacy of Deterrence

Each nuclear weapon in the U.S.

FY 2008 NNSA Budget Request Overview

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #79

No Rush To Reb uild. America Has Time to Review US Nuclear Policy Before Rebuilding the Weapons Complex

NPT/CONF.2015/PC.I/WP.12*

U.S. Nuclear Policy and World Nuclear Situation

PANEL TO ASSESS THE RELIABILITY, SAFETY, AND SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR STOCKPILE

Executive Summary. If the current NNSA plan goes forward, total new expenditures between 2010 and 2015 would be at least $6.7 billion.

Nuclear Modernization, Enhanced Military Capabilities, and Strategic Stability

Nuclear Weapons Status and Options Under a START Follow-On Agreement

Fact Sheet, 1 Oct. 2014, <


National Nuclear Security Administration Office of Defense Programs. Update to the Energy Federal Contractors Group. Xavier Ascanio.

Reducing the waste in nuclear weapons modernization

LONGENECKER and ASSOCIATES. James M. Broughton

FY 2005 Appropriations Hearing March 25, 2004

This page left intentionally blank

NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT POLICY BEYOND THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES UNITED STATES SENATE

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

NMMSS, Nuclear Archaeology, and the Verification of Nuclear Disarmament

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES UNITED STATES SENATE

U.S. Nuclear Strategy After the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review

NNSA Overview for STGWG

Issue Briefs. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More. Nuclear Weapons: Less Is More Published on Arms Control Association (

What is the current status of Trident replacement in the UK?

What if the Obama Administration Changes US Nuclear Policy? Potential Effects on the Strategic Nuclear War Plan

TOWN OF TAOS, NEW MEXICO & TAOS COUNTY, NEW MEXICO JOINT RESOLUTION Town of Taos Resolution No Taos County Resolution No.

Arms Control and Proliferation Profile: The United Kingdom

National Nuclear Security Administration. November 2015

The Atomic Weapons Establishment: Present work and possibilities for the future

Making Smart Security Choices The Future of the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Complex

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #123

US Nuclear Policy: A Mixed Message

OHIO Replacement. Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence

[This is a rush, unofficial transcript provided by

Project On Government Oversight

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

The United States Nuclear Weapons Program. The Role of the Reliable Replacement Warhead

Rapporteurs: Lisbeth Gronlund and Robert W. Nelson 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Appendix B - Page 1. Modification No.: 645 Supplemental Agreement to Contract No.: DE-AC52-07NA27344

Trends in World Nuclear Forces, 2016

NATO s New Guided Standoff Nuclear Bomb

During the Cold War, both the United States and the Soviet

Special Report. Inquiry into the De-Inventory of Special Nuclear Material at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Great Decisions Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military. Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF' DEF'ENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC NOV

Physics 280: Session 29

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Program MDAP/MAIS Code: 468

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL C. D. HANEY COMMANDER UNITED STATES STRATEGIC COMMAND BEFORE THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES 27 FEBRUARY 2014

Nuclear Warheads: The Reliable Replacement Warhead Program and the Life Extension Program

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #92

Remarks to the Stanley Foundation Conference U.S. Nuclear Force Posture and Infrastructure

CRS Report for Con. The Bush Administration's Proposal For ICBM Modernization, SDI, and the B-2 Bomber

6. Monitoring Nuclear Warheads

Cooperative Threat Reduction

POLICY AND GLOBAL AFFAIRS The National Academies Press Washington, DC March 30, /30/2012 1

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #96

ASSESSMENT OF THE SAFETY OF US NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND RELATED NUCLEAR TEST REQUIREMENTS

V. Chinese nuclear forces

Making the World Safer: reducing the threat of weapons of mass destruction

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS,

The Reliable Replacement Warhead Program: Background and Current Developments

Thank you for inviting me to discuss the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.

Analysis of Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Bill: HR Differences Between House and Senate NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

The Reliable Replacement Warhead Program: Background and Current Developments

The Reliable Replacement Warhead Program: Background and Current Developments

Report of the United States of America. Pursuant to Actions 5, 20, and 21. of the NPT Review Conference Final Document

Achieving the Vision of a World Free of Nuclear Weapons International Conference on Nuclear Disarmament, Oslo February

U.S. nuclear forces, 2008

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) FY 2012 OCO

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2004

THE FUTURE OF U.S.-RUSSIAN ARMS CONTROL

Nuclear Weapons Data Management

THE FUTURE OF U.S. NUCLEAR FORCES: BOOM OR BUST?

Volume 13 No. 4 February 2, 2009 INSIDE HIGHLIGHTS

The Reliable Replacement Warhead Program: Background and Current Developments

Fukushima Dai-ichi March 11, 2011 and Beyond

Nuclear Warheads: The Reliable Replacement Warhead Program and the Life Extension Program

Aircraft Carriers Enduring and Transformational

By Thomas Scheber National Institute for Public Policy. Foreword By Congressman Roscoe Bartlett and Congressman Terry Everett

Though the size of the US nuclear. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. US nuclear forces, Hans M. Kristensen and Robert S.

Nuclear Capabilities

THE COST OF U.S. NUCLEAR FORCES

A New Foundation for the Nuclear Enterprise Report of the Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise

Transcription:

SE8RET NAT IONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION NNSA Budget Update November 5, 2013 SEe RET

Key Points - Overview This NNSA budget reflects Secretary Moniz's commitments to the priorities articulated in the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review. To make the world safer, priority is placed on the disposition of 34 metric tons of weapons grade plutonium requiring an additional $500M per year. To maintain a safe and reliable stockpile, DOD-directed stockpile work remains at the levels funded in the FY 2014 FYNSP and the FY 2014 SSMP. However, the level of funding in the FY 2014 FYNSP will not support the level of mission work in the FY 2014 SSMP. Funding for Science & Technology, Security, Safety, and Naval Reactors remains at the FY 2014 FYNSP and SSMP levels. The schedule for infrastructure recap slips and risks of managing aging infrastructure increase. 2 ---------- eae{r:c dcelsiszals'lim~... ll.

2111112... (bl(l) --..._. fllnidiiiiiiiur IIMIJIIMivAIIC

... -~...- CbXI) alh,...gr...,lndpiwivm

FY2015-19 Highlights for Defense Programs Commibnent to a safe and reliable stockpile W76 LEP to complete production in FY 2019. 861 LEP continues as planned to achieve FPU in FY 2020. Maintains funding levels from the FY 2014 FYNSP for the cruise missile warhead. - Study the adaptability of the wao and W84 cruise missile warheads to the ALCM follow-on platfoml, wilh.no flllljor alteration or LEP within the FYNSP - A NWC decision to pursue a 861 warhead option is unlikely to have significant cost advantages Umited Life Component Exchange activities to keep existing stockpile operational and funds surveillance to support stockpile assessment Propose a reduction In the deployed W88 stockpile to allow the AF&F effort (Ait 370) to combine with the W78/88-1 intero"rable warhead with EPU delayed to 2030. - No separate W88 Alt 370 program Ability to perform physical experiments to support weapons assessments is reduced, slowing weapons code improvements for stockpile assessment and certification. Commitment to lame infrastructure recapitalization Continue to fund UPF at levels consistent with last year's budget Begin replacing capabilities of the CMR facility by adding equipment to the RLUOB and repurposing PF-4. Change in W78188-1 LEP schedule allows deferral of funding to achieve 30 ppy WR capability to beyond the FYNSP. As in the FY14 FYNSP. no design/construction funding of modular approach to replace the capabilities of PF-4 at LANL. 5

Issues of NWC Interest... FYM I.,_ 'I tdj.... II"_.-:-.. Mt I fv1i JFttNJJ. -. -- -"..._of NWC Interest B61 12l P S37 691 659 638 739 730 3,457 FY20FPU W76-1LEP Cruise Missile Warhead l P 235-259 9 252 28 249 55 245 91 123 141 1,128 Complete production in FY19 Stucfy dapt.bilityofw80.nd Wl4in ALCM follow-on, 11nless NWC dirm a 324 861 option W78/8&1lEP 73 - - - - - - FI'U delayed to FY30 W88Ait370 169 - - - - - - Combined with W78/88-1 Neutron Generators 150 153 156 159 162 166 796 Other Stockpile Maintenance 133 143 1S3 110 191 203 860 Weapon MX from Stockpile Systems Stockpile Swveillance 211 230 245 258 2fi1 219 1,279 From Sy$tems, MTP, R&D Spt Dismantlement and Di~sition 49 46 47 47 65 n Supports Z022 Weapons 277 dismantlement commitment Provides a plutonium-based Plutonium Sustainment 144 162 175 182 143 159 821 component manufacturinc capability Pit Reuse/Pu Ar)nr)Pu Experiments 61 106 123 124 120 118 590 Pu Met. I Pmussln&, Pu StJat. TA-SS. Plutonium Strategy 116 87 184 120 133 115 639 TRU Waste, RLWTF UPF 326 499 587 604 641 655 2,986 consistent with FY14 FYNSP plan \1. 8tt8fPuc dcelsls::al/lmlsaspe~ 6

Alternative to Current Strategy - Prioritizing W88 Alt 370 This option remains within the NNSA FY15-19 budget top line. W88 Alt 370 prioritized with an FPU of FY19. LRSO is deferred to outside the FYNSP with an FPU - FY29. First interoperable W78/88-1 FPU in FY30... -----,.,.._.. ;f..mi.:"' l -, fy& 1 r:mi FYS!t rnu..u W88Ait 370 by fy19 +165 +160 +149 +144 +175 Offsets OeferlRSO -9-28 -55-91 -141 Redua UPF -1.56-132 -94-53 -34 Total, Offsets -165-160 -149-144 -175 Remalnln& Funds LRSO - - - - - UPF 343 455 510 588 621 Impact to UPF: The reduction will - delay completion of the project and transition of the BLDG 9212 capabilities by at least 1 year; - increase total project cost due to escalation and lost efficiency; and - require additional funding in the outyears to maintain BLDG 9212. +794-325 -469-194 - 2,517 7

Summary The NNSA FY15-19 budget submission reflects Secretary Moniz's commitments to the 2010 NPR. - Adds funds to plutonium disposition - Funds weapons modernization (DSW) at levels consistent with FY14 FYNSP Two strategic options for weapons modernization. - Option 1 (FY15-1 9 budget submission): proceed with LRSO and combine W88 Alt 370 with W78/88-1 to achieve FPU in FY 2030 - Option 2: prioritize W88 Alt 370 to achieve FPU in FY 2019 and defer LRSO to beyond FYNSP Both options fit within the FY15-19 FYNSP top line. 8