C-Band Working Group Update. Steve O'Neal AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 2/20/13

Similar documents
White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Wildland Fire Assistance

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Development of a Hover Test Bed at the National Hover Test Facility

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

2016 DOD T&E Spectrum Activity

at the Missile Defense Agency

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May


The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

Spectrum Certification

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

The Need for NMCI. N Bukovac CG February 2009

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

HOWARD G. WHITE, TIMOTHY TOBIK, RICHARD MABRY Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate AFRL/MNMF Eglin AFB, FL

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

Conservation Law Enforcement Program Standardization

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

TITLE: Vitamin D and Related Genes, Race and Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

Report No. D February 23, Reimbursable Fees at Four Major Range and Test Facility Bases

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress

Choose to Lose. Tammy Lindberg, Lt Col, USAF, BSC

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Environmental Trends Course Cultural Resources

Harnessing the Power of MHS Information Systems to Achieve Meaningful Use of Health Information

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

DoD Architecture Registry System (DARS) EA Conference 2012

TITLE: Comparative Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Chronic Pain and Comorbid Conditions in Veterans

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

World-Wide Satellite Systems Program

Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) Patient Care Platform: Expanding Global Applications and Impact

SIMULATOR SYSTEMS GROUP

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Military Health System Conference. Public Health Service (PHS) Commissioned Corps

MCAS BEAUFORT SUSTAINABLE RANGES BRIEF MCAS BEAUFORT COMMUNITY PLANS AND LIAISON OFFICE (CP&L)

AFRL-VA-WP-TP

Air Education and Training Command

Ballistic Protection for Expeditionary Shelters

ý Award Number: MIPR 3GD3DT3083 Total Eye Examination Automated Module (TEAM) PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Colonel Francis L.

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Report Documentation Page

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

Cold Environment Assessment Tool (CEAT) User s Guide

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

USAF TECHNICAL TRAINING NAS Pensacola Florida Develop America's Airmen Today --- for Tomorrow

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Walter Reed Army Medical Center Washington, DC

Air Education and Training Command

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

Google Pilot / WEdge Viewer

The Security Plan: Effectively Teaching How To Write One

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

Tim Haithcoat Deputy Director Center for Geospatial Intelligence Director Geographic Resources Center / MSDIS

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

Transcription:

AFFTC-PA-12286 C-Band Working Group Update Steve O'Neal A F F T C m AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 2/20/13 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA AIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (20-02-2013) 2. REPORT TYPE Technical 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE C-Band Working Group Update 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 3/12 -- 5/12 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER MIPR 5b. GRANT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) Steve O'Neal 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Jacobs Corporation, Steve.Oneal.ctr@edwards.af.mil 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER AFFTC-PA-12286 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Tom Young, EA 12. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release A: distribution is unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES CA: Air Force Flight Test Center Edwards AFB CA CC: 012100 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) N/A 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 14. ABSTRACT As a way to alleviate today s Spectrum congestion by augmenting operations using C-Band T&E mission execution delays caused by L/S spectrum assignments constraints Improve mission capabilities with services not possible using current L/S allocations Use it or lose it Spectrum not being used is always a prime target for others who want additional spectrum Preparing for future spectrum auctions by experimenting with C-Band 15. SUBJECT TERMS C-Band Working Group Update, Spectrum, Telemetry, L-band, S-band, C-band 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: Unclassified a. REPORT Unclassified b. ABSTRACT Unclassified 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT 18. NUMBER OF PAGES c. THIS PAGE Unclassified None 15 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON 412 TENG/EN (Tech Pubs) 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (include area code) 661-277-8615 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18

Agile, Responsive & Competitive, Warriors Supporting Warriors A Great Place to Live and Work C-Band Working Group Update Steve O Neal 412 TW/TMGGB Pending PA approval: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. AFFTC-PA No.: XXXXX I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Agenda C-Band Overview Spectrum Use Trends Why Use C-Band C-Band Current Utilization C-Band Implementation Resources Conclusions 2

C-Band Overview World Radio Conference (WRC) 2007 approved a C- Band allocation for Airborne Mobile Telemetry (AMT) 4400 to 4940 MHz ITU Region 2 5091 to 5150 MHz All ITU Regions 5150 to 5250 MHz ITU Region 1 5925 to 6700 MHz ITU Region 2 IRIG STANDARD 106-11, Chapter 2 defined C-Band as Lower C-band 4400-4940 MHz Middle C-band 5091-5150 MHz Upper C-band 5925-6700 MHz Reference: http://www.wsmr.army.mil/rccsite/documents/106-11_telemetry%20standards/chapter2.pdf 3

Air Force Flight Test Center WRC-07 Results NOT ALLOCATED EXCEPT AUSTRALIA Asia/Oceana.,-~... ~~ ::7'- Region 2 Americas NOT ALLOCATED EXCEPT BRAZIL Region 1 Europe/ Africa 1.4 GHz of RF Spectrum Awarded to Support Aeronautical Telemetry 4

Spectrum & Data Rate Trends Now: F-35/JSF Data Rate: Links potentially capable of 14 Mbps Each test mission can generate ~ 1 TB of data, most of which is recorded 1997: F-22 Data Rate: 2 Links, each 5 Mbps Instrumentation data: 800 samples/sec 1986: F-15 Data Rate: 1 Link, 256 kbps Instrumentation data: 20 samples/sec Increasingly complex systems have exponentially increased data rate 5

Air Force Flight Test Center Spectrum & Data Rate Trends 300 i 10,000 275 'N 100 Q. I: Collected Data.c VH-711 ~ "'0 - E 1J Q.l - ~ c 0 ' Tra111smitted Data..., GJ cu 1,000 250 2 ~ Vl...,... C! 0 ~ :t:: GJ Q. "' CD rn 1; 100 225 0) Q!,l Decreasing spectrum availability & Increasing system complexity 200 2005 2010 Leads to 1970 1980 1990 2000 year Large amounts of data being recorded onboard the test platform 6

Why use C-Band Now? As a way to alleviate today s Spectrum congestion by augmenting operations using C- Band T&E mission execution delays caused by L/S spectrum assignments constraints Improve mission capabilities with services not possible using current L/S allocations Use it or loose it Spectrum not being used is always a prime target for others who want additional spectrum Preparing for future spectrum auctions by experimenting with C-Band 7

The Elephant in the Room Future Spectrum Auctions Pending Policy & Regulatory actions FCC National Broadband Plan President Obama s 500 MHz Initiative 1755 to 1850 MHz relocation report just released Other DOD Spectrum allocations may (will?) be proposed for auctions Spectrum Auctions are here to stay 8

Can C-Band be used NOW? Short answer YES On any DOD Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB) National Telecommunications and Information Administration Agency (NTIA) Regulations, Paragraph 7.11 Use of Frequencies by Certain Experimental Stations On any non-dod MRTFB using Temporary assignments FCC currently working with NTIA to formalize allocations allowing permanent assignments in Manual of Regulations and Procedures for Federal Radio Frequency Management (Redbook) 9

Who is using C-Band now? United States Navy PAX River Carrier Suitability Test telemetry Rotary Wing testing telemetry United States Air Force Edwards AFB Test Pilot School support telemetry Foreign Military Sales support telemetry Eglin AFB Ground mobile target vehicles video links 10

C-Band Implementation Resources Working Group(s) Range Spectrum Requirements Working Group Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) C-Band Working Group Missile Defense Agency C-Band Working Group Raytheon C-Band Working Group TRMC C-Band Working Group Monthly Telecons discuss current C-Band test results and Range Peer C-Band activities Bi-Annual Face to Face Meeting held day prior to RCC/Telemetry Group meeting On Line Information Portal (DOD ONLY) 11

C-Band Implementation Resources cont. C-Band Deployment experts AFFTC/Edwards AFB Kip Temple, Instrumentation Systems (661) 527-1604 Robert Selbrede, Range Systems (661) 527-1179 AAC/Eglin Nathan King, Range Systems (850) 882-3248 NAVAIR/PAX Robert Myers, Range Systems (301) 342-8739 Bruce Johnson, Instrumentation Systems (301) 342-3816 12

Conclusions C-Band Spectrum Assignments to support aeronautical Applications are available NOW! C-Band performance is very similar to S-Band C-Band implementation resources are available to assist anyone investigating use of C-Band to support T&E missions 13