Dental Safety Net in Iowa Project (DSNI): Project update, Webinar #4

Similar documents
Oral Health Care Workforce Policy: Innovation, Tradition, and Challenges

Background 11/14/14. Purpose of Survey. Presenter Disclosures. Tara Ray

Patient-Centered Dental Home development project: Phase 1 study methodology

Innovation Fund for Oral Health Launch Webinar January 9, 2013

Preventing Medical Errors : A Call to Action. Definitions of Quality. Quality of Care. Objectives. Background of the Quality Movement

Re: California Health+ Advocates opposes the proposed state budget changes to the 340B program

Summary Report of Findings and Recommendations

Employers are essential partners in monitoring the practice

Medicaid Medicare CHIP Services Dental Association

Community Plan. Missouri Fall practicematters. For More Information

University of Iowa Institute for Clinical and Translational Science (ICTS)

Cross-Systems Collaboration: Working Together to Identify and Support Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs

Executive Summary November 2008

Angela Herman, MPA Missouri Primary Care Association

The Second National Nursing Oral Health Summit The Nursing Oral Health Journey: Successful Innovations and Challenges

practicematters Rhode Island Summer 2015 For More Information Community Plan

ACCESS POINTS MAY Partner Spotlight: Delta Dental Smiles Model for Access: Part 3. In Need of a Doctor Starting Young for Healthy Teeth

Financial Planning, Implementation, and Control to Support Payment and Care Delivery Reform Insights for Safety Net Providers

Fostering Effective Integration of Behavioral Health and Primary Care in Massachusetts Guidelines. Program Overview and Goal.

the center JEWISH RENAISSANCE MEDICAL CENTER

Studying HCAHPS Scores and Patient Falls in the Context of Caring Science

Paying for HIV Prevention: Reimbursement & Sustainable Payer Sources

National ACO Summit. Third Annual. June 6 8, Follow us on Twitter and use #ACOsummit.

FTCA Deeming Process and Risk Management for Health Center Oral Health Programs

To Protect and Validate: Use of Clinical Data for Simulation

Cost Analyses of the Iowa Medicaid Health Home Program

Community Health Workers in Michigan: Next Steps

Systems Based Thinking and Practice. AAMC Jewish Healthcare Foundation MIT Sloan School

National Academies of Sciences Achieving Rural Health Equity and Well-being:

WHITE PAPER. NCQA Accreditation of Accountable Care Organizations

An Introduction to MPCA and Federally Qualified Health Centers~ Partners for Quality Care

Recovery Homes: Recovery and Health Homes under Health Care Reform

Presented to the West Virginia Governance Forum May 2, 2014 Stonewall, West Virginia

Oral Health Integration Workflow Optimization: A Streamlined Guide for Primary Care Practices

Health Professions Workforce

NEEDS ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE REFUGEE COMMUNITY. Brittany DiVito, BSN, MPH Nationalities Service Center

Non-Insured Health Benefits (NIHB) Joint Review Update to the First Nations Health Managers Association National Conference

INVESTING IN INTEGRATED CARE

Have existing coordination/integration efforts yielded Medicaid expenditure savings?

FLORIDA S STATE ORAL HEALTH

Improving Population and Clinical Health with Integrated Services and Decision Support

SURVEY OF VIRGINIA S RURAL HEALTH CLINICS

Partnering with Managed Care Entities A Path to Coordination and Collaboration

Florida Healthy Kids Program Performance Improvement Project Validation Reporting on PIPs Implemented During the Evaluation Period

Improving Care and Lowering Costs: The Use of Clinical Data by Medicaid Managed Care Organizations. April 26, 2018

Alternative practice patterns of dental hygienists

Barbie Robinson, Health Services Director Rod Stroud, Health Services Interim Assistant Director Terri Wright, CAO Analyst

Transforming Care for Vulnerable Populations:

The State of Health in Rural C olorado

AMCHP 2017 Annual Conference Saturday, March 4, :30-4:30PM

Annual Medicaid Roundtable April 20, 2017 FINAL WITH RESPONSES

UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT AND CARE COORDINATION Section 8

EMERGENCY PLANNING PROCESS WRAP UP SESSION

Aiming Higher. A State Scorecard on Health System Performance. Joel C. Cantor and Dina Belloff

10/14/2013. County Commissioners and Managers: What Public Policy Leaders Should Know & Do. Presentation Overview. About NACo.

National Hispanic Medical Association & Health Foundation. Elena Rios, MD, MSPH Jan. 20, 2011

School Health Program. Mecklenburg County Health Department

Telemedicine and Health Reform. Jonathan Neufeld, PhD Clinical Director Upper Midwest Telehealth Resource Center

NCQA WHITE PAPER. NCQA Accreditation of Accountable Care Organizations. Better Quality. Lower Cost. Coordinated Care

RPC and OMH Collaborative Care Webinar. February 1, pm

Laying the Foundation for Successful Clinical Integration

Going Above & Beyond. Annual Report

Home Health Value-Based Purchasing Series: HHVBP Model 101. Wednesday, February 3, 2016

Medicaid Fundamentals. John O Brien Senior Advisor SAMHSA

Promoting Women s Self-Care of

Improving Patient Care Outcomes Through Better Delegation- Communication Among Nurses and Assistive Personnel

Course Module Objectives

GRADUATE PROGRAM IN PUBLIC HEALTH

ACA Policy Professional Supervision

Improving Health in a Climate of Change NACo San Diego, California January 31, 2014

Jeff Schiff, M.D., M.B.A. Medicaid Medical Director, Minnesota Department of Human Services

Using An APCD to Inform Healthcare Policy, Strategy, and Consumer Choice. Maine s Experience

Pediatric Council Meeting 10/13/2015 Minutes MedChi Headquarters, Baltimore

Effective Collaboration Between Critical Access Hospitals and Federally Qualified Health Centers

Evaluation of a Psychiatric NP Residency Program in Integrated Care. Presenters. APNA 30th Annual Conference Session 3033: October 21, 2016.

Value based care: A system overhaul

Innovative Oral Health Care Delivery Models: Registered Dental Hygienists in Alternative Practice

Scaling up transformative health education. Dr Bernhard Gaede Rural Health: UKZN 3 July 2012

Presentation to the State Innovation Model Learning Community July 12, 2017 Ankeny, IA

CITY OF LOS ANGELES JOINT LABOR-MANAGEMENT BENEFITS COMMITTEE

MEDICAID DENTAL PROGRAM Policy Review

CLINICAL INFORMATICS

HOUSE BILL 44 PRIMARY CARE RATE INCREASE AND ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS:

Second Opinion Program. A feature of our Health Advocacy Service

National Commission on Children and Disasters 2010 Report to the President and Congress August 23, Report Publication Date: October 2010

HealthPartners and the Triple Aim. IHI Open School August 23, 2012 Beth Waterman, RN MBA Chief Improvement Officer HealthPartners

The Road to Collaboration Is Paved With Good Intentions Challenges Developing an Interprofessional Education Framework at NYU College of Dentistry

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. Community Assessment in Disaster: Framework, Process, and Tools

August 8, :00pm to 1:00pm Pamela Lester, Molly Layton and Janeen Boswell

TX Action Learning Collaborative: National Standards for Systems of Care for CYSHCN

STATE CHILDREN S INSURANCE PROGRAM HEALTH CHOICE. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. General Statutes 108A

Comprehensive Protocol Feasibility Questionnaire

Commonwealth Fund Scorecard on State Health System Performance, Baseline

HealthPartners Inspire (SNBC) Overview

ASTHMA MANAGEMENT AND COLLABORATION IN PRIMARY CARE

MINUTES Budget SubCommittee DAVIDSON COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH. February 25, :00 pm BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT VISITORS PRESENT

Terms of Reference Regulation of Dental Services Programme Board

Integrating Health Care & Public Health to Improve HIV Early Detection and Control

approved Nevada s State Innovation Model (SIM) Round October 2015 Division of Health Care Financing and Policy Introduction to SIM

THE WILLIAM PATERSON UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND HEALTH DEPARTMENT OF NURSING. Syllabus

Transcription:

Dental Safety Net in Iowa Project (DSNI): Project update, Webinar #4 Pete Damiano Director, Public Policy Center Professor, College of Dentistry University of Iowa July 2, 2013 Support provided by DentaQuest Foundation and The Commonwealth Fund

The Iowa Safety Net and ACA project: Agenda 1. Progress report 2. Overview of conjoint analysis 3. Selection of survey factors 4. Conjoint survey schedule a) Advisory committee pilot testing b) Revisions c) Release

Steering Committee Pete Damiano (PI) Ray Kuthy (Co-investigator) Susan McKernan (Co-investigator) Elham Kateeb (Co-investigator UI OSU) Julie Reynolds (Grad Research Asst.) Nancy Adrianse (Iowa PCA) Sarah Dixon Gale (Iowa PCA)

National Advisory Committee Members Meg Booth/Colin Reusch Cathy Coppes Wayne Cottam Jim Crall Isabel Garcia DaShawn Groves/Jaime Hirschfeld Larry Hill Mike Kanellis Janice Kupiec Mary Mariani Michael McCunniff Beth Mertz Pamela Riley Bob Russell Ed Schooley Debra Scott/Scott Trapp Andy Snyder Maria Rosa Watson DentaQuest reps Matthew Bond Mark Doherty Andrea Forsht Mike Monopoli

Project Phases 1. Establish a National Oral Health Advisory Committee Done 2. Survey private dentists about Medicaid participation and attitudes Completed 3. Compile a background inventory report on oral health in Iowa, especially as it relates to vulnerable populations Draft completed

Project Phases 4. Conduct conjoint analysis to determine factors affecting dentist participation in Medicaid In development 5. Assess the capacity of FQHC dental clinics in Iowa Concurrent with similar study of medical care capacity as part of CMWF project 6. Develop policy recommendations to improve the safety net and increase public/private collaborations After data are collected

Survey 1 Dentist Medicaid Survey Used dentist responses to problems with Medicaid to determine factors in Conjoint Received email addresses from 305

Respondents to Survey 1 Email Addresses N=305 All Respondents N=776 Iowa Dentists N=1,389 Sex Male Female 81% 19% 78% 22% 77% 23% Age (mean ± SD) 49 ± 12 50 ± 12 49 ± 13 Specialty General 89% 85% 83% Ortho 3% 5% 6% OMFS 3% 4% 4% Pediatric 3% 3% 3% Endo 0% 1% 2% Perio 1% 1% 1% Prosth 1% 1% 1%

Survey 2 Conjoint survey of dentists attitudes towards the Medicaid program

Survey 2 Conjoint survey Conjoint technique pioneered in business and marketing Survey design uses a series of scenarios that ask dentists whether they would accept a patient or not Scenarios are developed to include specific factors that vary across several levels Responses are based on the dentist s consideration of all factors Designed to reveal hidden preferences

Ecological model for dentist participation in Medicaid Ecological models of human behavior emphasize environmental and policy contexts of behavior Also incorporates social and psychological influences of behavior Consideration can be given to multiple levels of influence Allows for development of more comprehensive interventions

Factors from ecological model used in Conjoint survey Policy Organizational Community Inter-personal (Patient) Intra-personal (Dentist) Reimbursement Changing regulations Paperwork Delay in payment Extent of covered services Intermittent eligibility Other dentists that accept Medicaid Broken appointments Non-compliance Intermittent eligibility Self-efficacy with difficult pts Fear of govt investigation

Potential conjoint factors from dentist survey Mean importance* (Survey 1) Low reimbursement rates 3.78 Broken appointments 3.75 Denial of payment 3.41 Patient non-compliance with recommended treatment 3.22 Complicated paperwork 3.07 Frequently changing Medicaid regulations 3.01 Limited services covered by Medicaid 3.00 Intermittent eligibility of Medicaid patients 2.98 Not enough other practices in the area accept Medicaid 2.90 patients Slow payment 2.82 Fear of government investigation 1.92 *4-point scale Also used factor loading to determine factors

Ecological model for dentist participation in Medicaid Policy Reimbursement Organizational Delay in payment Community Inter-personal (Patient) Other dentists that accept Medicaid Broken appointments Intra-personal (Dentist)

Survey 2 Conjoint survey Factors Based on the most important problems with Medicaid that were reported by dentists in the first survey Levels Determined by review of the literature and expert opinion

Selected factors & levels Domain Factor Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Policy Reimbursement rate 35% 55% 85% Organizational Claim approval The first submission is unlikely to be approved The first submission may or may not be approved The first submission will be approved Community Other practices in the area that accept new Medicaid patients No other practices A few other practices Many other practices Inter-personal Patient behavior Often misses an appointment Sometimes misses an appointment Never misses an appointment

Conjoint scenarios 9 factor/level combinations will be presented to participants as scenarios Scenarios are presented in a random sequence during the online survey All will get the same scenarios, different order Responses indicate factor importance (similar to regression coefficients) 2 holdout scenarios are used to validate results Look for consistency of responses

Scenario introduction: background information For the following hypothetical scenarios, assume that a healthy 32-year-old patient from your community calls your practice and needs a lost MO restoration on tooth # 19 replaced. The tooth is asymptomatic. The patient is enrolled in the Iowa Medicaid program and is eligible for the next 12 months. Given the extra information that is provided below, would you accept this new patient in your practice?

Scenario 1 At the time this patient calls your practice, you know there are a few other practices in your area accepting Medicaid patients. You are also aware that this patient often misses an appointment. Medicaid will reimburse you at 85% of your usual fees for this service and the first submission of your claim will be approved. Would you accept this new patient in the scenario described above? Yes, I would No, I wouldn't

Scenario 2 At the time this patient calls your practice, you know that there are no other practices in your area accepting Medicaid patients. You are also aware that this patient never misses an appointment. Medicaid will reimburse you at 55% of your usual fees for this service and the first submission of your claim will be approved. Would you accept this new patient in the scenario described above? Yes, I would No, I wouldn't

Scenario 3 At the time this patient calls your practice, you know that there are many other practices in your area accepting Medicaid patients. You are also aware that this patient often misses an appointment. Medicaid will reimburse you at 55% of your usual fees for this service and the first submission of your claim may or may not be approved. Would you accept this new patient in the scenario described above? Yes, I would No, I wouldn't

Scenario 4 At the time this patient calls your practice, you know that there are many other practices in your area accepting Medicaid patients. You are also aware that this patient sometimes misses an appointment. Medicaid will reimburse you at 35% of your usual fees for this service and the first submission of your claim will be approved. Would you accept this new patient in the scenario described above? Yes, I would No, I wouldn't

Scenario 5 At the time this patient calls your practice, you know that there are a few other practices in your area accepting Medicaid patients. You are also aware that this patient never misses an appointment. Medicaid will reimburse you at 35% of your usual fees for this service and the first submission of your claim may or may not be approved. Would you accept this new patient in the scenario described above? Yes, I would No, I wouldn't

Scenario 6 At the time this patient calls your practice, you know that there are no other practices in your area accepting Medicaid patients. You are also aware that this patient sometimes misses an appointment. Medicaid will reimburse you at 85% of your usual fees for this service and the first submission of your claim may or may not be approved. Would you accept this new patient in the scenario described above? Yes, I would No, I wouldn't

Scenario 7 At the time this patient calls your practice, you know that there are a few other practices in your area accepting Medicaid patients. You are also aware that this patient sometimes misses an appointment. Medicaid will reimburse you at 55% of your usual fees for this service and the first submission of your claim is unlikely to be approved. Would you accept this new patient in the scenario described above? Yes, I would No, I wouldn't

Scenario 8 At the time this patient calls your practice, you know that there are no other practices in your area accepting Medicaid patients. You are also aware that this patient often misses an appointment. Medicaid will reimburse you at 35% of your usual fees for this service and the first submission of your claim is unlikely to be approved. Would you accept this new patient in the scenario described above? Yes, I would No, I wouldn't

Scenario 9 At the time this patient calls your practice, you know that there are many other practices in your area accepting Medicaid patients. You are also aware that this patient never misses an appointment. Medicaid will reimburse you at 85% of your usual fees for this service and the first submission of your claim is unlikely to be approved. Would you accept this new patient in the scenario described above? Yes, I would No, I wouldn't

Scenario 10 (Holdout) At the time this patient calls your practice, you know that there are many other practices in your area accepting Medicaid patients. You are also aware that this patient often misses an appointment. Medicaid will reimburse you at 35% of your usual fees for this service and the first submission of your claim is unlikely to be approved. Would you accept this new patient in the scenario described above? Yes, I would No, I wouldn't

Scenario 11 (Holdout) At the time this patient calls your practice, you know that there are many other practices in your area accepting Medicaid patients. You are also aware that this patient sometimes misses an appointment. Medicaid will reimburse you at 35% of your usual fees for this service and the first submission of your claim is unlikely to be approved. Would you accept this new patient in the scenario described above: Yes, I would No, I wouldn't

Conjoint Schedule Final revisions, online coding, & IRB approval By July 30 th Email survey out (N=305) August 1 st

Year 2 activities Phase 1: Year 1 wrap up 1. Completion of conjoint analysis/writing 2. Completion of FQHC capacity analysis/writing 3. Dentist participation writing/presentations Phase 2: Policy development 1. Convene a meeting of public/private partners to discuss options for improving Medicaid participation

Year 2 activities Phase 3: Dental home development 1. Expert panel/focus groups- 1. Components of a dental home 2. Role for oral health in health home 3. Implications of ACO development for dentistry Builds on work in Iowa around community care team development and ACOs and safety net 2. Instrument development for measuring dental homeness Builds on work in Iowa regarding medical homeness