FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

Similar documents
FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

Executing our Maritime Strategy

OPNAVINST A N Oct 2014

Meeting the Challenge of a New Era

Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF UNITED STATES FLEET FORCES COMMAND

Recapitalizing the Navy s Battle-Line

Navy s Central Operational Authority Network and Information Operations & FORCEnet

We acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC OPNAVINST DNS-3 11 Aug 2011

NETWARCOM. PR 11 Integrated Priority List and the Requirements Process

... from the air, land, and sea and in every clime and place!

Navy Information Warfare Pavilion 19 February RADM Matthew Kohler, Naval Information Forces

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Cybersecurity United States National Security Strategy President Barack Obama

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Subj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM

Department of the Navy FY 2006/FY 2007 President s Budget. Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

The best days in this job are when I have the privilege of visiting our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen,

CAPT Heide Stefanyshyn-Piper

J. L. Jones General, U.S. Marine Corps Commandant of the Marine Corps

STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001

Space as a War-fighting Domain

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

OPNAVINST C N2/N6 31 Mar Subj: UNITED STATES NAVAL COOPERATION AND GUIDANCE FOR SHIPPING

OPNAVINST DNS-3 17 Sep Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

US Military Space Organizations

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

SECTION 1 ARLEIGH BURKE FLEET TROPHY SECTION 2 JUNIOR OFFICER AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE IN SHIPHANDLING...7-5

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Ship Maintenance: Provider Perspective. VADM Paul Sullivan Naval Sea Systems Command

The Coastal Systems Station Strategic Perspective

OPNAVINST N9 16 Jun Subj: CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING STRATEGY

WikiLeaks Document Release

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

Great Decisions Paying for U.S. global engagement and the military. Aaron Karp, 13 January 2018

Logbook Adm. Greenert and Gen. Amos: A New Naval Era Adm. Greenert and Gen. Welsh: Breaking the Kill Chain

New Leadership for Naval Education and Training Command

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

OPNAVINST A N2/N6 31 Oct Subj: NAVY ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEM POLICY AND STANDARDS

Su S rface Force Strategy Return to Sea Control

Joint Warfare System (JWARS)

Subj: SURFACE SHIP AND SUBMARINE SURVIVABILITY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS

Foreword. Gordon England Secretary of the Navy

STRATEGIC PLAN. Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head EOD Technology Division. Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

OPNAVINST B N96 29 Jul 2014

Subj: NAVY ENTERPRISE TEST AND EVALUATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

NDIA Munitions Executive Summit Sustaining Industrial Readiness

MEDIA CONTACTS. Mailing Address: Phone:

navy strategy For AChIevIng InFormAtIon dominance navy strategy For AChIevIng InFormAtIon dominance Foreword

AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF

The Competition for Access and Influence. Seabasing

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

OPNAVINST DNS 25 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS COMMAND

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS

A Call to Action for the Navy Reserve

Naval Oceanography Overview

A Perspective from the Corps. Col Mike Boyd, USMC HQMC/LPE 3 Dec 2003

OPNAVINST N46 21 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVY INSTALLATIONS COMMAND

Hampton Roads Region Joint Land Use Study Norfolk / Virginia Beach

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Air Force Cyberspace Command NDIA 2007 DIB Infrastructure Protection Symposium

ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM POLICY AND MANAGEMENT

DOD DIRECTIVE DOD SPACE ENTERPRISE GOVERNANCE AND PRINCIPAL DOD SPACE ADVISOR (PDSA)

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

VISION MISSION. Deliver and sustain a full-spectrum surface combat force.

The Cruise Missile Threat: Prospects for Homeland Defense

Navy Warfare Development Command s (NWDC) Operations Research Chair of Warfare Innovation

Winning the Fight And Bridging to the Future We are in a fight that we must win Bringing the fight to our enemies is our mission.

UNCLASSIFIED FY This program develops and demonstrates advanced technologies, including Electromagnetic (EM) Rail Gun for naval weapon systems.

SHARPENING THE SPEAR

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

Global Vigilance, Global Reach, Global Power for America

STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL RICHARD P. FORMICA, USA

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Subj: NAVY ACCELERATED ACQUISITION FOR THE RAPID DEVELOPMENT, DEMONSTRATION, AND FIELDING OF CAPABILITIES

VADM David C. Johnson. Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition April 4, 2017

Air-Sea Battle & Technology Development

9 th Annual Disruptive Technologies Conference

Defense Daily Open Architecture Summit EMS Panel

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS FIELD MEDICAL TRAINING BATTALION Camp Lejeune, NC

United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) Challenges & Opportunities

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2011 Total Estimate

Sea Air Space. Delivering Capabilities for the Warfighter RADM Matt Kohler

Subj: FORCE HEALTH AND WELLNESS UNIT AWARD (GREEN H )

Enlisted Information Dominance Warfare Specialist (EIDWS) Common Core

UNCLASSIFIED. Unclassified

US Joint Forces Command Approach to Interoperability and Integration

STATEMENT OF REAR ADMIRAL MARK A. HUGEL, U.S. NAVY DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FLEET READINESS DIVISION BEFORE THE

CHAPTER 2. Sea Power 21 began the process. Bridging Vision and Program Decisions SEA POWER FOR A NEW ERA. of translating theory into practice

OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND

A Ready, Modern Force!

Winning in Close Combat Ground Forces in Multi-Domain Battle

April 25, Dear Mr. Chairman:

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : Undersea Warfare Advanced Technology

Transcription:

FLEET USE OF PRECISE TIME Thomas E. Myers Commander Fleet Forces Command Norfolk, VA 23551, USA Abstract This paper provides a perspective on current use of precise time and future requirements for precise time as they relate to individual shipboard systems, networks, satellite system, and clocks. It is based on studies performed by PMW 156 and others and upon recent demonstration of the use of Two-way Satellite Time Transfer (TWSTT) on USS Mount Whitney. Data are provided to show what kind of precise time standards and policies are in use today and how new timing architectures will provide cost-effective improvements in support of FORCEnet and other Navy and DoD initiatives that will require precise timing. FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE JOINT CHIEFS USNORTHCOM USJFCOM USSTRATCOM (Operational) Numbered Fleet Commander Task Force Commander Task Group Commander Task Unit Commander Task Element PRESIDENT SECDEF Unit Co CNO SECNAV (Administrative) Type Commander Surface Air Submarine Fleet Marine Force Group Commander Cruiser-Destroyer/Carrier Service Amphibious Ship Squadron or Air Wing Commander 2 419

FLEET FORCES COMMAND MISSION Organize, man, train, and equip naval forces for assignment to Combatant Commanders. Articulate Fleet war fighting and readiness requirements to the Chief of Naval Operations. FLEET FORCES COMMAND VISION Efficiently prepare active and reserve naval forces to win in combat Develop authoritative Fleet-coordinated readiness and warfighting requirements Explore transformational concepts; and Provide agile, powerful and persistent naval capability to Joint Commanders 4 420

CARRIER STRIKE GROUP (CSG) Power Projection Maritime Superiority Forward Presence Littoral Operations Maritime Interdiction 5 EXPEDITIONARY STRIKE GROUP (ESG) Power Projection Maritime Superiority Special Operations Military Operations Other Than War Amphibious Operations 6 421

SEA POWER 21 Sea Shield Sea FORCEnet Basing Sea Strike Sea Enterprise Warrior Shield Trial Sea Trial Sea Warrior Sea Enterprise Sea Basing FORCEnet Sea Strike Amplified, Effects-Based Communication Pre-positioned Projected Continual Greater Striking War Process Fleet-led, fighting Defense Ending and For Professional Power Efficiencies Data Capability Joint process Forces Networks And Of Growth innovation Allies and Ashore Development Increased Precision Divestment Enhanced Attack Accelerated Joint of And Information Sustained Support Accelerated Non-core Speed From Access and a Operations For Concept Functions Accuracy Maritime Improved Fullyand Trade of Netted, Coalition Selection Technology Decision Dispersed Building and Enhanced And Development Classification Naval Military Force support Ops Of Organizational Marines and Special Streamlining Integrated Forces Increased Knowledge Networked, Joint to Extended Enhanced Homeland Force Headquarters High-impact Dominate Enhanced Seamless Security theand Defense / Operational Fleet Investment Battle Integration Training alignment Space Agility in With War Joint fighting Strike Capability Packages 7 FFC ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS CNO PPBE REQUIREMENTS BUDGET EXECUTION THIRD FLEET CPF CFFC CLF CNE SECOND FLEET FLEET TYCOMS AIRFOR SURFOR SUBFOR NETWARCOM NWDC 8 422

FFC MAJOR FOCUS AREAS Organizational Alignment Establish FFC as the single fleet commander responsible for readiness and requirements Current Readiness Ensure high levels of fleet readiness and responsiveness by expanding and exploiting the Fleet Response Plan Efficient Use of Resources Incorporate the business dimension into planning and execution at all levels of command Fleet-driven Requirements Process A single, authoritative, coordinated Fleet-driven voice in the requirements process Active/Reserve Integration Structure, man, train and equip the Naval Reserve to better support Navy mission requirements 9 FLEET USE OF PRECISE TIME Minutes Seconds Milliseconds Microseconds Nanoseconds Ship clocks, watches, GCCS-M Celestial navigation Computer networks Communications systems Navigation, positioning systems, precise timing at timing labs USN/USMC PNT Policy ltr 27 June 00: Every platform/user with a validated requirement shall have a primary and least one alternative means of position and precise timing determination. The alternative must be independent of the the primaryp and may be a self-contained system. 10 423

DOD USE OF PRECISE TIME DOD Directive Number 4650.5 June 2, 2003 3.1 Procure cost effective airborne, land, sea and space PNT systems by taking advantage of existing military commercial systems whenever it may be done in a timely manner to meet military requirements. 3.2 Ensure that PNT systems support U.S. participation in allied d and coalition operations to the maximum extent possible. 3.3 Cooperate with other Departments and Agencies in managing and a overseeing dual-use use PNT systems. 3.4 Maintain a level of PNT service consistent with both military and civilian requirements within affordable limits. 3.5 Ensure the protection of PNT services from disruption by forces adversarial to the United States, its Allies, and Coalition Partners while denying similar PNT services to those adversary forces. 11 DOD USE OF PRECISE TIME CJCSI 6130.01C dtd 31 March 2003 3a. Most timing requirements are based on a need for synchronization or coordination among cooperating units of a system or between systems ems The standard for military systems is UTC, as maintained by the USNO U Master Clock, UTC (USNO). 3e. Ten nanoseconds (Objective, per GPS ORD) synchronized clock time is currently the most stringent timing requirement for DOD operational applications. 4e. TWSTT is available from USNO for high-precision PTTI. This procedure makes use of geostationary communications satellites to transfer time one nanosecond time transfer is possible. 12 424

FLEET USE OF TIME Current trend is increasing use of GPS for time Timing requirements are not well known OPNAVINST 3120.32C Apr 94 Ensure that chronometer comparisons are made to determine their rates and error, and that the ship s s clocks are set to the local standard zone time or in accordance with the orders s of the senior officer present. COMNAVAIR/SURFOR 3540.4 26 Feb 02 Ensure the ship s s clocks/chronometers are properly maintained and set. Ensure time checks are passed throughout the ship before any special evolution and logged in the Ship s s Deck Log. 13 NAVY TIMING INITIATIVES Timing requirements included in FORCENET plans SPAWAR/PMW 156 collecting Navy wide timing requirements: CEC, JTIDS, WSC-6, ACDS, BFTT CFFC ltr in support of Atomic Clock Vault at USNO TWSTT test conducted on USS Mt Whitney Timing architectures emerging: NAVSSI, TFDS, NCTAMS Fleet participation in OSD PNT S&T Working Group 14 425

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS JIM CAMPARO (The Aerospace Corporation): It looked like there are places that are taking care of the timekeeping requirements for the Navy. But is there any one organization or one group that is looking at interservice timekeeping requirements and allocations of timing requirements? BILL BOLLWERK (for TOM MYERS): Well, actually, that is what the Naval Observatory is supposed to do in its role as PTTI manager. That is going to be reinstituted within a directive within OSD. It should be taking care of looking at all the services timing requirements. We have been trying to do that over the last few years. We do have a database, which comprises some requirements from the Air Force, Army, Navy, and Marine Corps. We will continue to do that, so we keep that database. Dr. McCarthy is kind of in charge of that. If you have questions about that, please contact him. 426