Reconfirmation_SOP. - If the letter states that they were. Description/ Scope:

Similar documents
Submission to the OIE for official recognition of FMD country status and endorsement of official control programme

IAF Guidance on the Application of ISO/IEC Guide 61:1996

How to Use the Online Abstract Submission System for 20th Congress of the International Union for Quaternary Research (INQUA) 2019

Welcome to a tutorial on the abstract submission process for the 2015 Joint Assembly.

Technical and Financial report-stdf 14. 1am pleased to attach a technical and financial report on STDF 14 which has been duly completed.

Annex. Provisions on auditing notified conformity assessment bodies in the framework of Article 34 3 of the Agency Regulation 1

Qualifications Support Pack 03. Making Claims & Results

Brussels, 12 June 2014 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 10855/14. Interinstitutional File: 2012/0266 (COD) 2012/0267 (COD)

Submitting an abstract is a 3-step process. We strongly recommend that you complete your submission at one time.

SUPPORT TO INTERNATIONAL CO-PRODUCTION FUNDS

CEF TRANSPORT 2016 CALL FOR PROPOSALS. Guide for Applicants

PROCEDURE FOR ACCREDITING INDEPENDENT ENTITIES BY THE JOINT IMPLEMENTATION SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE. (Version 06) (Effective as of 15 April 2010)

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

Standard operating procedure

Submission of proposals

Research Policy. Date of first issue: Version: 1.0 Date of version issue: 5 th January 2012

Guidance on the Biocidal Products Regulation

CMDv/BPG/002. BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Veterinary Decentralised Procedure (DCP)

2017 Key Action 2 Handbook

The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Rules of Procedure of the Assembly

European Solidarity Corps Technical Guidance Volunteering Partnerships

H2020 FOF Innovation Action GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS. HORSE Application Experiments

EUROPEAN FEDERATION OF NURSES ASSOCIATIONS (EFN) CONSTITUTION

Open call for proposals VP/2004/021. Initiatives to promote gender equality between women and men, including activities concerning migrant women

GLOBAL CHALLENGES RESEARCH FUND TRANSLATION AWARDS GUIDANCE NOTES Closing Date: 25th October 2017

Standard Operating Procedures for Processing Municipal and Residual Waste General Permit Applications. Bureau of Waste Management

Development of a draft five-year global strategic plan to improve public health preparedness and response

Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. Charitable Funds. Staff Lottery Scheme Procedure

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

Annex A Summary of additional information about outputs

THE NAUGHTON SCHOLARSHIPS TERMS AND CONDITIONS 2018

Participating in the 7th Community RTD Framework Programme. Athens 28/2/07 SSH Information Day

Procedures and Conditions of GLP Registration

COUNTY OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS (TYPICAL)

The Assistant Director-General for External Relations and Cooperation

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps. Call for proposals 2011 for "pilot projects" Guidelines for grant applicants

AFC Club Licensing Quality Standard

Factsheet n. 5 Project Selection

Frequently Asked Questions EU Aid Volunteers Initiative

IAF MLA Document. Policies and Procedures for a MLA on the Level of Single Accreditation Bodies and on the Level of Regional Accreditation Groups

ICT, FET Open LIFT ICT-FP Using Local Inference in Massively Distributed Systems Collaborative Project D 7.1 Quality Assurance Plan

Version September 2014

Article 36 Cooperation

PROJECT AND PROGRAM CYCLE POLICY. Policy: OP/PL/01 Issued on November 3, 2016

Regulations on Tuberculosis Control

ERASMUS MUNDUS Frequently-asked questions ACTION 2: Questions from higher education institutions Latest update: January 2011

CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR PARTNERSHIP1 COMM/FPA/2016

PART A. In order to achieve its objectives, this Code embodies a number of functional requirements. These include, but are not limited to:

Horizon 2020: rules for participation, proposal submission and evaluation procedure. Monique Bossi APRE- Italy

Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme Continuous Monitoring Manual

FMO External Monitoring Manual

INTERNSHIP AND COMMUNITY SERVICE PLACEMENT HANDBOOK 2018/19

Technology Bank for the Least Developed Countries

Nuclear Safety Council (State Official Gazette No. 268 of 8 th November 2007) October 2007, on the CSN Resident

National Accreditation Board for Certification Bodies. Accreditation Procedure. for. Energy Management Systems Certification Bodies

GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS GRANT FOR PROJECT. Call Identifier: PP Closing Date: 15 May 2018

Accelerated Translational Incubator Pilot (ATIP) Program. Frequently Asked Questions. ICTR Research Navigators January 19, 2017 Version 7.

1. INTRODUCTION SNVEL

Research Governance Framework 2 nd Edition, Medicine for Human Use (Clinical Trial) Regulations 2004

UNITAID PROPOSAL PROCESS

Call for proposals DG EAC/21/06

GUIDELINES FOR CRITERIA AND CERTIFICATION RULES ANNEX - JAWDA Data Certification for Healthcare Providers - Methodology 2017.

Healthcare Professions Registration and Standards Act 2007

CALL FOR PROPOSALS FOR PARTNERSHIP COMM/FPA/2016

Bureau of Waste Management

Application Guide for the Aboriginal Participation Fund

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

ANNEX III FINANCIAL AND CONTRACTUAL RULES I. RULES APPLICABLE TO BUDGET CATEGORIES BASED ON UNIT CONTRIBUTIONS

Database for online accreditation process in Directorate for Accreditation of Kosovo (DAK-MIS) Abstract

International Health Regulations (IHR) Implementation status in the Americas

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Ref.: ERI/MSP/PPF/LZF/ June 2018

Dr. R. Sathianathan. Role & Responsibilities of Principal Investigators in Clinical Trials. 18 August 2015

AGSVA SERVICE LEVEL CHARTER FOR DEFENCE INDUSTRY Australian Government Security Vetting Agency and Defence Industry

Guideline for Research Programmes Rules for the establishment and implementation of programmes falling under the Programme Area Research

Guidelines for the UNESCO Chairs Program in Canada

Théa Corporate Foundation

Partnerships Scheme. Call for Proposals

ERN Assessment Manual for Applicants

Medical devices briefing for patients: Patient safety in the new Regulation

Manatee County Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) Animal Services. for

CMDCAS Handbook Policies and Procedures for Sector Qualification under the Canadian Medical Devices Conformity Assessment System (CMDCAS)

INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION REPORT 2017/118. Audit of demining activities in the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon

Call for UAB grant applications for the capture and retention of research talent at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

NHS. The guideline development process: an overview for stakeholders, the public and the NHS. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence

CONTRACT SPECIFICATION

Draft Procedure for Community gtld Change Requests January 2018

THE BOARD OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC COMMISSION RESOLUTION. dated December 22, 2015 N 174

Awarding body monitoring report for: The Graded Qualifications Alliance (GQAL) August Ofqual/09/4634

Electric Mobility Europe Call 2016

DOD INSTRUCTION DOD PUBLIC HEALTH AND MEDICAL SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES

Erasmus+ Project Results Platform

Internal Audit Report. Public Transportation Grant Management TxDOT Office of Internal Audit

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Recruiting emerging leaders in oncology Leaders de demain en oncologie

Health Research 2017 Call for Proposals Rules for Participation

2018 GRANT GUIDELINES Accepting Applications May 10, 2018 June 28, 2018

Guidance for Authorities. Submitting a Proposal to host the. International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners

European System of Evaluation of Veterinary Training (ESEVT)

Transcription:

_SOP Standard Operating Procedure on the reconfirmation of officially recognised disease status and of the endorsement of national official control programmes of Member Countries Description/ Scope: This procedure describes the process for the submission of annual reconfirmations for the maintenance of official disease status or endorsed official national control programmes. The subprocess for the reconfirmation of a status or of an endorsed control programme fits in the overall Official Status Recognition Process. Related documents Related process List of acronyms: of a Status or Programme - 1 (annexed) Resolution No. 15 adopted at the 83rd General Session Resolution No. 16 adopted at the 83rd General Session Official Status Recognition Process - Procedure (Application_SOP) - Application_ Expert Mission Deployment - Procedure (Mission_SOP) - Mission_ Suspension, Recovery and Withdrawal - Procedure (Suspension_SOP) - Suspension_ AHG: Ad hoc Group DDG: Deputy Director General, Standards and Science DG: Director General DSD: Disease Status Department SCAD: Scientific Commission for Animal Diseases Step Time Reference Responsible person Action Reference Document 1. September SCAD 2. October DG 3. October Delegate Selects 10% of official status reconfirmations and all the national official control programmes for a comprehensive review at its forthcoming February meeting. Sends reminder letters for Delegates of Member Countries with an officially recognised status or endorsed national control programme. - If the letter states that they were preselected for a comprehensive review, see step 4; - If not, see step 5. C.2 4. October/ November Delegate Responds to DG acknowledging receipt and providing the details of a contact person. 1 For the purpose of clarity, this will be referred to as _SOP Version 1 - June 2017 1

5. November Delegate 6. DSD 7. DSD Submits reconfirmation online, including supportive information as per requested in the Terrestrial Code. Checks administrative and technical compliance: - If reconfirmation is not fully compliant and information is missing, see step 7; - If reconfirmation is fully compliant, see step 8. Send emails to Delegates requesting the necessary additional information within a set deadline. A.2 7.1 Within the specified deadline Delegate Provides the OIE with the necessary information. C.1 7.2 DSD 8. DSD 9. DSD 10. DSD 11. DSD 11.1 DSD Checks the provided additional information - If the information provided allows the assessment of the annual reconfirmation, see step 8; - On the contrary, see step 7. Verifies the type of reconfirmation: - If it concerns a selected annual reconfirmation (national official control programme or selected status), see step 10; - In any other case, see step 9. - If there are any indications that the Member Country may not continuously comply with the requirements for maintenance of the disease status, see step 10; - If the assessment confirms compliance with the requirements for maintenance of the disease status, see step 11. Forwards the Member Country s reconfirmation dossier to the SCAD for review with the reasons for requesting the SCAD s revision. Drafts a report on all reconfirmations assessed by the Department for the SCAD, specifying whether the reconfirmation has been positively assessed or whether SCAD must review the application in depth. Validates in the on-line system the positively assessed reconfirmations. 11.2 Delegate Receives automatic message upon validation. D.1 12. SCAD Reviews the report on reconfirmations assessed by the DSD (in step 11). Comprehensively reviews all national official control programme reconfirmations, preselected disease status reconfirmations and reconfirmations highlighted by the DSD (in step 10). _SOP 2

13. SCAD 14. DSD For each reconfirmation: - If information is required, see step 14; - If not, see step 15. Requests information from the Member Country contact point. 14.1 Within the required deadline Delegate / point of contact Provides requested information. C.3 15. SCAD For each reconfirmation: - If a specific expert opinion is required, see step 16; - If not, see step 17. 16. DSD Requests recommendation from relevant expert(s). 16.1 Expert(s) Provide(s) recommendation on the reconfirmation. 17. SCAD 18. SCAD 19. DSD 20. DSD 20.1 Delegate For each reconfirmation: - If a mission is necessary, see mission subprocess (Mission_SOP) - If not, decides on the outcome of the maintenance of the officially recognised disease status or endorsement of the national official control programme. Annexes a report dedicated to annual reconfirmations to its February meeting report. For each reconfirmation: - If the evaluation outcome is positive, and the reconfirmation had already been validated on line by DSD (in step 11.1), see step 36 of Application_SOP; - If the evaluation outcome is positive, and the reconfirmation had not been yet validated on line by DSD, see step 20; - If the evaluation outcome is negative, see Suspension, Recovery and Withdrawal subprocess Validates annual reconfirmations endorsed by SCAD through the online system. Receives automatic message upon validation; and see step 36 of Application_SOP. D.1 _SOP 3

_ on the reconfirmation of officially recognised disease status and of the endorsement of national official control programmes of Member Countries A. Scope for annual reconfirmations Officially recognised disease status As stated in the provisions of the Terrestrial Animal Health Code (Terrestrial Code), annual reconfirmation is mandatory for Member Countries with an officially recognised disease status in order to maintain their official recognition. When a Member Country fails to maintain compliance with the requirements of the Terrestrial Code for a disease for which its status had been officially recognised, its previously recognised official status can be suspended (cf. Suspension_SOP). National official control programmes Member Countries having an officially endorsed national control programme must inform the OIE on an annual basis of the progress on the implementation of the official control programme. When a Member Country fails to maintain compliance with the requirements of the Terrestrial Code related to a country having an endorsed national official control programme, the endorsement of the programme can be withdrawn (cf. Suspension_SOP). In accordance with Resolution No. 15 adopted at the 83rd General Session, Member Countries with an endorsed official control programme and for which the entire territory had been further recognised as having an officially recognised free status for that disease are only requested to provide the annual reconfirmation for the official disease status. B. Submission of an annual reconfirmation Timeline Whether for the reconfirmation of an officially recognised disease status or endorsed national programme, Member Countries must submit their annual reconfirmation before 30 November of the corresponding year. Member Countries that have not completed their annual reconfirmation by 31 January of the following year would have their officially recognised disease status automatically suspended and the endorsement of their official control programme automatically withdrawn. An official letter from the Director General is sent, in October of each year, to remind all OIE Delegates of Member Countries having at least one officially recognised status or having an officially endorsed national control programme about their duties with regard to annual reconfirmation. Available channels/methods Member Countries may submit their annual reconfirmations through: - The on-line secured system developed by the OIE to facilitate the submission and follow-up of all annual reconfirmations: _ Version 1-1 June 2017 4

o o The system is accessible in the three official working languages of the OIE (English, French and Spanish) via the following link: http://www.oie.int/zf/forms/diseasestatus/public/index.php/. Only the Delegate s username and password allow access to the on-line system (same as the access for the OIE World Animal Health Information System, WAHIS); the personal username and password of the OIE focal points for animal disease notification (provided by the Delegate to allow the focal point s access to WAHIS) do not allow access to the on-line annual reconfirmation system. Once logged in, the Delegates are directed to the relevant annual reconfirmation forms that they can complete and submit on-line with uploaded supportive documents and information, as appropriate. - While it is strongly encouraged that Member Countries submit their annual reconfirmations through the on-line system, the traditional forms are available on the OIE website and the OIE Delegates website. If used, the annual reconfirmation forms must be duly signed by the OIE Delegate and be supplied in electronic format to the Director General of the OIE as email file attachments to the following email address (disease.status@oie.int) or in hardcopy. Irrespective of the chosen channel, supportive documents should be provided, as stated in the relevant Terrestrial Code chapters and annual reconfirmation forms. The reference to the relevant articles of the Terrestrial Code stating the information to be provided for retention on the OIE List of Member Countries or zones having an officially recognised disease status or an endorsed national official control programme is provided in Annex 1. Roles and responsibilities The annual reconfirmation procedure is coordinated by the OIE Headquarters (Disease Status Department). Considering the strong links and the communication channels established with the OIE Member Countries, the OIE Regional and Sub-Regional Representations also play an active role in: - maintaining awareness among Member Countries in the Region and/or Sub-Region on their obligation to provide the annual reconfirmations of their official disease status and BSE risk status and endorsed national official control programme by the 30 November or appointed deadlines for the submission of additional information; - reminding Member Countries of the timeline and the procedure, and following up on the process until all reconfirmations from the Region/sub-Region are submitted and validated; - answering any query raised by Member Countries in the Region and/or Sub-Region related to the procedure for the annual reconfirmation and to the requirements described in the relevant Terrestrial Code Chapters and Articles, with the support of the Status Department, when relevant; - informing the Status Department in case of any doubts related to the capacity of a Member Country to maintain its OIE recognised official status or endorsed control programmes. An identified contact point within the Disease Status Department is dedicated to each Region and/or Sub-Region as part of the coordination mechanism between OIE Headquarters and Regional and Sub- Regional Representations. Financial obligations In accordance with Resolution No. 16 adopted at the 83rd General Session, fees are not requested for annual reconfirmations. _ 5

D. Assessment of the annual reconfirmations Screening by the Disease Status Department All annual reconfirmations submitted are screened upon receipt by the Disease Status Department according to the requirements stated in the reconfirmation questionnaires, as well as any other information available in the public domain that is considered pertinent to the evaluation of dossiers. If PVS missions have been conducted during the previous year, their reports are also considered as part of the process (Ref. B.2 /Application_SOP). If an information gap is identified, the OIE Headquarters may request the submission of amended documents or additional information by an appointed deadline. As English is the working language of the Scientific Commission, the relevant documents that are assessed by the Scientific Commission are translated if they have been submitted in Spanish or French. Assessment by the Scientific Commission 2.1 SELECTED ANNUAL RECONFIRMATIONS 2.1.1 NATIONAL OFFICIAL CONTROL PROGRAMMES All annual reconfirmations of countries having an endorsed official control programme are transmitted every year by the Disease Status Department to the Scientific Commission for Animal Disease (Scientific Commission) for a comprehensive review (except those Member Countries whose entire territory has been further recognised as having an officially recognised free status for that disease, cf. section A.1.2 of these ). 2.1.2 SELECTED OFFICIAL DISEASE STATUS In its September meetings each year, the Scientific Commission selects approximately 10% of the annual reconfirmations for disease status that they will comprehensively evaluate at their February meeting, based on the technical and administrative considerations described in Annex 2. Member Countries are informed that their reconfirmation will be assessed by the Scientific Commission in the letter sent by OIE Headquarters in October, reminding them of the deadline for submission of the annual reconfirmation and asking them to provide the contact details (name, email address and phone number) of a technical person that could be available before or during the February meeting of the Scientific Commission, so that any questions may be referred to the Member Country without delay. 2.2 OTHER OFFICIAL DISEASE STATUS A summary report of the assessment of all the other disease status reconfirmations that were not in the preselected 10% is presented to the Scientific Commission by the Disease Status Department. When the Disease Status Department identifies during its technical screening process an annual reconfirmation which does not provide enough guarantee of continuous compliance with the conditions for maintenance of the disease status, or detects any information deemed of interest for the Scientific Commission, the report specifies the latter or the reasons for the subsisting doubt and includes the information provided in the reconfirmation for a comprehensive review by the Scientific Commission. Interaction with the applicant Member Country During the evaluation of a submitted dossier, the Scientific Commission may request complementary information from the Member Country who should respond within the indicated deadline. If it is not possible to meet the deadline, the applicant Member Country should indicate when the additional information requested would be submitted to the OIE Headquarters. All correspondence that has taken place between the Scientific Commission and the OIE Headquarters as well as between the Member Country and the OIE HQs is duly documented by the OIE Headquarters. _ 6

Additional information The Scientific Commission may use any information available in the public domain that is considered pertinent to the evaluation of dossiers; if PVS missions have been conducted during the previous year, their reports are also considered as part of the process (cf. section. B.2 of the Application ). When a particular expert opinion is necessary, the Scientific Commission may request the input of a specific expert (e.g. member of the relevant ad hoc Group) in the evaluation of Member Countries status with regard to the concerned disease in the assessment of the annual reconfirmations. The Scientific Commission may also request the Director General to deploy an expert mission to a Member Country to monitor the maintenance of the allocated disease status or the progress on the implementation of the national official control programme (see section A.3 of Mission_). E. Communication on the outcome of the evaluations Communication to Member Countries having submitted an annual reconfirmation Following its assessment, the Disease Status Department provisionally validates in the on-line system the annual reconfirmations showing continuous compliance with the conditions for maintenance of the disease status, to be further confirmed by the Scientific Commission. Annual reconfirmations reviewed in depth by the Scientific Commission and for which there is a positive outcome are also validated by the Disease Status Department through the on-line system after the Scientific Commission meeting. When an annual reconfirmation is validated in the on-line system a validation message is automatically sent to the Delegate of the relevant Member Country clarifying that the maintenance of a disease status or of the endorsement of a national official control programme will only be sanctioned by the approval of the OIE World Assembly of Delegates at the following General Session. In the case of a negative outcome after review from the Scientific Commission, a letter from the Director General of the OIE is sent indicating the specific requirement(s) of the Terrestrial Code that was (were) not met by the Member Country and the options on the way forward. Those options may include request of additional information, request of a mission (cf. Mission_SOP), or suspension of the status/withdrawal of the endorsement of the national official control programme. A suspended status may be further recovered through the specific procedure for the recovery of an official status (Suspension_SOP). The outcomes of the assessment of the annual reconfirmations that have been evaluated by the Scientific Commission are published in its meeting report, which is released in the public domain after the outcomes have been communicated to the concerned Member Countries. Communication to Member Countries that have not submitted their annual reconfirmation(s) by the end of January In the case of a Member Country that has not submitted their annual reconfirmation(s) by the end of January, the Scientific Commission would not be able to assess their compliance with the requirements of the Terrestrial Code for the maintenance of their officially recognised disease status or for the validation of their national official control programme. Thus, a letter from the Director General of the OIE is sent indicating the suspension of the status or the withdrawal of the endorsement of the national official control programme. A suspended status may be further recovered through the specific procedure for the recovery of an official status (Suspension_SOP). The Member Countries that have not submitted their annual reconfirmation(s) by the end of January and for which the status has been consequently suspended or the endorsement of their official control programme withdrawn, are named in the meeting report of the Scientific Commission, which is released in the public domain after the outcomes have been communicated to the concerned Member Countries. _ 7

Communication to other Member Countries Prior to each General Session, the Director General of the OIE circulates, to all Delegates for comments within a 60-day period, a list of the Member Countries for which the Scientific Commission has recommended to recognise an official disease status or to endorse a national official control programme at the forthcoming General Session, in accordance with Resolution No. 15 adopted at the 83rd General Session, and other relevant Resolutions previously adopted. The existing List of Member Countries and zones already having an officially recognised disease status or having an endorsed national official control programme and for which the Scientific Commission has recommended to maintain the status or the programme endorsement is also enclosed in this letter to all Delegates for their information and comments. For more information on the commenting and endorsement process, please refer to the general of the official status recognition process (Application_). _ 8

ANNEX 1 Requirements of the Terrestrial Code for the annual reconfirmations The relevant information to be submitted by Member Countries having an officially recognised disease status, BSE risk status and/or endorsed national official control programme through the annual reconfirmation is prescribed in the Terrestrial Code, as follows: AHS free country or zone Article 12.1.2. NB CBPP free country or zone Article 11.7.3. CSF free country or zone Article 15.2.3. FMD free country or zone where vaccination is not practiced Article 8.8.2. NB FMD free country or zone where vaccination is practiced: Article 8.8.3. NB PPR free country or zone: Article 14.7.3. NB Negligible BSE risk Article 11.4.3. Controlled BSE risk Article 11.4.4. Endorsed official control programme for CBPP Article 11.7.18. NB Endorsed official control programme for FMD Article 8.8.39. NB Endorsed official control programme for PPR Article 14.7.34. NB NB: The Terrestrial Code requires that Member Countries provide supportive documents to substantiate their annual reconfirmation. ANNEX 2 Main factors to be considered for selection of annual reconfirmations to be scrutinised The targeted number of Member Countries to be potentially evaluated represents 10% of Member Countries having an official status for each disease. This 10% includes Member Countries selected based on the following considerations: Recent recognition of a disease status for this country (to ensure the maintenance of measures presented in the application); Request for a specific follow-up from the ad hoc Group or the Scientific Commission during the initial assessment of the dossier or during the assessment of a previous annual reconfirmation; Change in the epidemiology of the disease (increased threat in the region which the maintenance of a high level of surveillance is crucial, occurrence of BSE cases, etc.); Member Countries for which the political/economic situation may have impacted the performance of the Veterinary Services; Follow-up of the recommendations made during a previous missions; Feedback from the Regional and Sub-Regional Representations that would justify a close follow-up of the situation; Member Countries may also be randomly selected. NB: Annual reconfirmations of all Member Countries of which the national official control programme has been endorsed by the OIE are scrutinised by the Scientific Commission (without selection). _ 9