PE NUMBER: 6386F PE TITLE: Joint Precision Approach Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification 6386F Joint Precision Approach Cost ($ in Millions) 4652 Total Program Element (PE) Cost Precision Landing Systems 23 Actual 1.47 1.47 24 25 26 25.781 25.781 27 21.26 21.26 28 21.65 21.65 29 21.98 21.98 Cost to Complete Total A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification Joint Precision Approach and Landing System (JPALS) is a joint effort among the Air Force (AF), Navy, and Army. The AF is designated as the lead Service. JPALS will define the future precision approach and landing system for the Department of Defense (DoD) to provide a joint operational capability for U.S. forces to perform assigned conventional and special operations missions from fixed-base, tactical, shipboard, and special mission environments under a wide range of meteorological conditions. Also, JPALS will ensure DoD maintains civil interoperability with current and projected Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member country landing systems. When complete, this effort will replace aging shipboard and ground-based precision landing systems (Instrument Landing System, Precision Approach Radar, Microwave Landing System, and Instrument Carrier Landing Systems). JPALS will facilitate DoD missions and training by enabling US forces to land on any airfield worldwide (land and sea) under peacetime and hostile conditions. JPALS also decreases the time required for deploying forces to a theater by providing an assured landing capability. JPALS provides increased inter-and intra-theater logistics throughput and the ability to fight at night and in inclement weather. Furthermore, JPALS will provide a precision landing capability where none currently exists. It will enhance interoperability for naval aircraft landing at shore-based fields operated by other services and ensure interoperability for the Civil Reserve Air Fleet at DoD airfields, especially in the expeditionary environment. The 1997 JPALS Analysis of Alternatives (AOA) reflected Local Area Differential Global Positioning System (LDGPS) as the most promising technology to meet the mission need. Development activities are initially focused on reducing technical risks. First, JPALS will employ quality guidance in the presence of Global Positioning System (GPS) jamming. Second, its architecture will be developed to integrate and synchronize with related Global Air Traffic Management (GATM) and GPS modernization initiatives. Third, JPALS will develop and integrate encrypted data links and antenna sets. Finally, JPALS will harmonize with U.S. and international civil satellite navigation and ground navigation systems development. This effort will result in avionics modifications to over 14, DoD aircraft. Because JPALS will result in a family of systems, other technologies will be monitored and evaluated such as an Autonomous Landing Capability (ALC) and the FAA local and wide area differential GPS alternatives. This program is in budget activity 4, Demonstration and Validation, Research Category 6.4B, because supportability and manufacturing process design considerations must be identified and integrated into the precision landing architecture. R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 55-2 of 55-9 633 Exhibit R-2 (PE 6386F)
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification 6386F Joint Precision Approach B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) Previous President's Budget Current PBR/President's Budget Total Adjustments Congressional Program Reductions Congressional Rescissions Congressional Increases Reprogrammings SBIR/STTR Transfer Significant Program Changes: 23 11.267 1.47 -.797 -.5 -.119 24 13.847 -.226 -.18 -.118 25 18.798 -.21 -.418 R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 55-3 of 55-9 634 Exhibit R-2 (PE 6386F)
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification 6386F Joint Precision Approach Cost ($ in Millions) 4652 Precision Landing Systems Quantity of RDT&E Articles 23 Actual 1.47 24 25 26 25.781 27 21.26 28 21.65 29 21.98 Cost to Complete Total A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification Joint Precision Approach and Landing System (JPALS) is a joint effort among the Air Force (AF), Navy, and Army. The AF is designated as the lead Service. JPALS will define the future precision approach and landing system for the Department of Defense (DoD) to provide a joint operational capability for U.S. forces to perform assigned conventional and special operations missions from fixed-base, tactical, shipboard, and special mission environments under a wide range of meteorological conditions. Also, JPALS will ensure DoD maintains civil interoperability with current and projected Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member country landing systems. When complete, this effort will replace aging shipboard and ground-based precision landing systems (Instrument Landing System, Precision Approach Radar, Microwave Landing System, and Instrument Carrier Landing Systems). JPALS will facilitate DoD missions and training by enabling US forces to land on any airfield worldwide (land and sea) under peacetime and hostile conditions. JPALS also decreases the time required for deploying forces to a theater by providing an assured landing capability. JPALS provides increased inter-and intra-theater logistics throughput and the ability to fight at night and in inclement weather. Furthermore, JPALS will provide a precision landing capability where none currently exists. It will enhance interoperability for naval aircraft landing at shore-based fields operated by other services and ensure interoperability for the Civil Reserve Air Fleet at DoD airfields, especially in the expeditionary environment. The 1997 JPALS Analysis of Alternatives (AOA) reflected Local Area Differential Global Positioning System (LDGPS) as the most promising technology to meet the mission need. Development activities are initially focused on reducing technical risks. First, JPALS will employ quality guidance in the presence of Global Positioning System (GPS) jamming. Second, its architecture will be developed to integrate and synchronize with related Global Air Traffic Management (GATM) and GPS modernization initiatives. Third, JPALS will develop and integrate encrypted data links and antenna sets. Finally, JPALS will harmonize with U.S. and international civil satellite navigation and ground navigation systems development. This effort will result in avionics modifications to over 14, DoD aircraft. Because JPALS will result in a family of systems, other technologies will be monitored and evaluated such as an Autonomous Landing Capability (ALC) and the FAA local and wide area differential GPS alternatives. This program is in budget activity 4, Demonstration and Validation, Research Category 6.4B, because supportability and manufacturing process design considerations must be identified and integrated into the precision landing architecture. B. Accomplishments/Planned Program ($ in Millions) Continue aircraft risk (anti-jam) and integration analyses Continue development of LDGPS test bed Continue studies and analyses to refine local LDGPS architecture Begin modeling & simulation Complete aircraft risk (anti-jam) and integration analyses Complete development of LDGPS test bed Complete studies and analyses to refine local LDGPS architecture Complete modeling & simulation 23 2.965 2.768 2. 2.737 24 25 3.458 3.496 4.314 2.353 R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 55-4 of 55-9 635 Exhibit R-2a (PE 6386F)
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification 6386F Joint Precision Approach Start development of JPALS Ground & Air System/Segments Complete Milestone B Preparation Start Demo System Preparation Start Aircraft Integration Studies Start Test Program Development Total Cost C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) 23 24 Actual Other APPN Not Applicable 1.47 25 26 27 28 29 15.2.2.67 1.515.8 Cost to Total Cost Complete D. Acquisition Strategy Perform Demonstration and Validation through award of multiple contracts (Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), Time and Material (T&M), Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF). R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 55-5 of 55-9 636 Exhibit R-2a (PE 6386F)
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E Project Cost Analysis 6386F Joint Precision Approach Cost Categories (Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Requirements) ($ in Millions) Product Development Architecture Requirements Definition LDGPS (ARD) SRGPS ARD Contract Method Performing Activity & Total & Type Location Prior to 23 Cost C/CPAF C/CPFF SRGPS ARD C/CPFF NAVY Eng Support C/FFP ESC ITSP 1 C/IDIQ NAVY Datalink Research C/FFP NAVY PM and Eng Support Reimbursable ESC FFRDC Engineering Support C/CPAF NAVY Eng Studies C/FFP NAVY Eng Studies C/FPFF Specialized Cost Services Falcon Star (F16 Intregration) Study C/IDIQ C/FFP SDD Ground and Air Segment Contract LDGPS Technology Development C/T&M Raytheon Systems (LDGPS), Tewksbury, MA Raytheon Systems (SRGPS), Salt Lake City, UT Sierra Nevada Corp, Salt Lake City, UT ARINC Inc., California, MD Horizons Technology Inc, Billerica, MA Rockwell Collins Inc., Cedar Rapids. IA Navy PMA21381, NAS Pax River, MD MITRE Corporation, Bedford, MA PRC Corporation, Lexington Park, MD Pacer Infotech Inc., Lexington Park, MD MCR, Lexington, MA Lockheed Martin Services, Ft Worth, TX ARINC Eng Services, 23 23 Cost Award Date 24 24 Cost Award Date Cost to 25 25 Complete Cost Award Date 13.847 Total Target Cost Value of Contract 13.847 3.34.976 3.34.976 1.757 1.757 5.876 5.876 1.8 1.8 16.336.85 Oct-2.78 Jan-4.1 Oct-4 3.49 1.72 Oct-2.931 Oct-3 1.192 Oct-4.451.451.512.512.25 May-5.451.579.131 Apr-3.37.81 Mar-3 5.121.54 Oct-2.969 Oct-3 4.681 6.5 Dec-2 4.63 Dec-3 R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 55-6 of 55-9 637.323 May-4.987 Oct-4 9.972 Feb-5 1.252 Dec-4 7.581 11.173 21.145 17.36 Exhibit R-3 (PE 6386F)
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E Project Cost Analysis 6386F Joint Precision Approach Air Force EGI Studies Subtotal Product Development Remarks: Test & Evaluation Responsible Test Organization Flight Test Support Subtotal Test & Evaluation Remarks: Management and Operations ESC FFRDC Program Management Support GA SPO Operations Subtotal Management and Operations Remarks: Total Cost SS/T&M LLC, California, MD Honeywell, Clearwater, FL 1. 59.695 Reimbursable Reimbursable C/T&M C/T&M Navy - NAWCAD, NATC Pax River, MD 46TG/XPRF, Holloman, NM MITRE Corp, Bedford, MA ESC/ITSP II (), Bedford, MA 1.357 Jun-4 8.373 8.261 13.753 1.41 2.357 1.41.56.1 May-3 1.463 Mar-4.8 Mar-5 2.869 1.547.1 1.463.8 3.91.886.2 Oct-2.2 Oct-3.285 Oct-4 9.354 1.72 May-3 2.43 May-4 2.26 May-5 1.24.725 May-3 1.997 1.294 May-4 3.897 1.287 May-5 3.832 71.482 1.47 R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 55-7 of 55-9 638 Exhibit R-3 (PE 6386F)
Exhibit R-4, RDT&E Schedule Profile 6386F Joint Precision Approach R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 55-8 of 55-9 639 Exhibit R-4 (PE 6386F)
Exhibit R-4a, RDT&E Schedule Detail 6386F Joint Precision Approach Schedule Profile Complete development of LDGPS test bed Complete aircraft risk (anti-jam) and integration analyzes Begin studies and analyses to refine local LDGPS architecture Complete studies and analyses to refine local LDGPS Architecture Begin modeling and simulation Complete modeling and simulation effort Begin M/S B prep work JPALS ground station development 23 24 3Q 4Q 25 4Q 4Q 3Q 4Q 2Q 3Q R-1 Shopping List - Item No. 55-9 of 55-9 64 Exhibit R-4a (PE 6386F)