Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

Similar documents
Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

MAKING IT HAPPEN: TRAINING MECHANIZED INFANTRY COMPANIES

Improving the Tank Scout. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain R.L. Burton CG #3, FACADs: Majors A.L. Shaw and W.C. Stophel 7 February 2006

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Redefining how Relative Values are determined on Fitness Reports EWS Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain S.R. Walsh to Maj Tatum 19 Feb 08

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

SSgt, What LAR did you serve with? Submitted by Capt Mark C. Brown CG #15. Majors Dixon and Duryea EWS 2005

Marine Corps Mentoring Program. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. D. Watson to CG #10 FACAD: Major P. J. Nugent 07 February 2006

Blue on Blue: Tracking Blue Forces Across the MAGTF Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain D.R. Stengrim to: Major Shaw, CG February 2005

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

The Affect of Division-Level Consolidated Administration on Battalion Adjutant Sections

Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

2010 Fall/Winter 2011 Edition A army Space Journal

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Sustaining the Marine Corps Martial Arts Program. EWS Contemporary Issues Paper. Submitted by Captain G.S. Rooker. Major Gelerter / Major Uecker, CG#3

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

The Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test: The Need to Replace it with a Combat Fitness Test EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain E. M.

The first EHCC to be deployed to Afghanistan in support

The Need for a New Battery Option. Subject Area General EWS 2006

USMC Identity Operations Strategy. Major Frank Sanchez, USMC HQ PP&O

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

In 2007, the United States Army Reserve completed its

Where Have You Gone MTO? Captain Brian M. Bell CG #7 LTC D. Major

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Submitted by Captain RP Lynch To Major SD Griffin, CG February 2006

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

The U.S. military has successfully completed hundreds of Relief-in-Place and Transfers of

Area Fire Weapons in a Precision Environment: Field Artillery in the MOUT Fight

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

The Army s Mission Command Battle Lab

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY

The Need for NMCI. N Bukovac CG February 2009

AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Water Usage at Forward Operating Bases

Joint Terminal Attack Controller, A Primary MOS For The Future. EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain M.J. Carroll to Major P.M.

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

GAO. FORCE STRUCTURE Capabilities and Cost of Army Modular Force Remain Uncertain

No Time for Boats EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain P. B. Byrne to Major A. L. Shaw and Major W. C. Stophel, CG 3 7 February 2006

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

IMPROVING SPACE TRAINING

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

Lessons learned process ensures future operations build on successes

Staffing Cyber Operations (Presentation)

Report No. D April 9, Training Requirements for U.S. Ground Forces Deploying in Support of Operation Iraqi Freedom

New Tactics for a New Enemy By John C. Decker

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Shallow-Water Mine Countermeasure Capability for USMC Ground Reconnaissance Assets EWS Subject Area Warfighting

Closing the Barn Doors After the Cows Have Left: MCRC s Solution to the Recruiter Shortfall EWS Subject Area Manpower

CAAT in Deliberate Urban Attacks

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Marine Officer Promotions: Incentivizing and Retaining Top Performers. Captain Michael J. Lorino

Adapting the Fitness Report: Evolving an intangible quality into a tangible evaluation to

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Wildland Fire Assistance

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

at the Missile Defense Agency

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Maintaining Tank and Infantry Integration Training EWS Subject Area Training

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

Rethinking Tactical HUMINT in a MAGTF World EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Capt M.S. Wilbur To Major Dixon, CG 8 6 January 2006

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Streamlining U.S. Army Military Installation Map (MIM) Production

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

Medical Requirements and Deployments

Campaign Planning for Logistics Organizations

Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

TRADOC REGULATION 25-31, ARMYWIDE DOCTRINAL AND TRAINING LITERATURE PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, 30 MARCH 1990

Military Police: The Force of Choice. EWS Contemporary Issues Paper. Submitted by Captain Erinn C. Singman. Major R.F. Revoir, CG 9.

The Security Plan: Effectively Teaching How To Write One

Transcription:

Battle Captain Revisited Subject Area Training EWS 2006 Battle Captain Revisited Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005 1

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE DEC 2005 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Battle Captain Revisited 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2005 to 00-00-2005 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) United States Marine Corps,Command Staff College Marine Corps University,2076 South Street, Marine Corps Combat Development Command,Quantico,VA,22134-5068 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 12 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

The Marine Corps has employed a position known as the battle captain within its combat operations centers (COC). However, the position does not appear on any table of organization (T/O) 1, and no training is currently available to prepare the Marines for the billet. To employ a battle captain billet effectively in a combat operations center the Marine Corps must reach consensus about its duties and employment and develop a supportive training curriculum. Background The term battle captain as it applies to the current employment can be found in literature as early as 1985 in the Army Field Circular (FC) 71-6, Battalion and Brigade Command and Control and then later in the 1995 Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL) Newsletter No. 95-7, Tactical Operations Center (TOC). 2 Both works identified the importance of a single person in an operations center who tracked battlefield progress and managed the information flow. In fact, the latter work actually called this person the battle captain. Since then, the Army has accepted the concept and standardized training and manuals for the employment of their battle captains, and employs them 1 A table of organization is a table listing the number and duties of personnel and the major items of equipment authorized for a military unit 2 Richard L. Wampler, James Centric, Margaret S. Salter, The Brigade Battle Captain- A Prototype Training Product, U.S Army Research Institute, June 1998 <https://www.infantry.army.mil/arifb/research/report%20summary/1998/ The%20Brigade%20Battle%20Captain.html> (27 September 2005). 2

widely in brigades and smaller tactical operations centers (TOC). By standardizing the concept and training, the Army has a consistent description and expectation of the responsibilities of a battle captain. Despite the fact that continuous refinement and improvements are being made to the concept, the Army is significantly further along in the training and employment of their battle captains than the Marine Corps is. The USMC also recognized the need to fuse responsibilities of the watch officer with the increasingly significant responsibilities of the information manager within the COC and generally accepted the battle captain concept and definition from the Army. However, the Marine Corps has been attempting to evolve the concept into one more suitable for the Corps. Because of this, the responsibilities and employment techniques of the battle captain concept differ from one combat operations center to another, which hinders the standardization of the billet. Battle Captain Defined To develop a battle captain training program the Marine Corps must first agree upon a definition of the term. The two most commonly accepted definitions are found in MCRP 5-12 Operational Terms and Graphics and in the instruction at the Marine Corps Expeditionary Warfare School. The definitions differ slightly in language, but significantly in meaning. 3

MCRP 5-12A Operational Terms and Graphics defines a battle captain as: the shift officer in charge within a command post associated by position and not rank. The battle captain is located in the operations section of a command post and oversees the conduct of command post operations during his shift. The battle captain ensures that relevant information is given to decision makers and works closely with all members of the command group and staff. 3 This very generic definition of the term focuses on the two major components of the concept, the watch officer and the information manager. By this definition, a conclusion can be drawn that a battle captain facilitates decisionmaking but is not, in fact, a decisionmaker. This is the main difference between the two definitions. as The Expeditionary Warfare School defines the battle captain a command post technique that assigns many duties and responsibilities traditionally associated with the information management officer and senior watch officer under a single, experienced officer; the purpose of the battle captain billet is to ensure the command post functions in a manner that supports the command and control needs of the commander throughout the planning, decision, execution and assessment (PDE&A) cycle. 4 3 Headquarters Department of the Army, Operational Terms and Graphics, 2004. Washington D.C.: 2004, 1-19. 4 Expeditionary Warfare School, EWS Battle Captain Primer, 2005. Quantico, VA: 2005, 1. 4

The EWS instruction expounds upon the definition as follows: Certain decision-making authorities are delegated to the battle captain as they can recognize patterns, analyze information, and distinguish routine from critical decisions. 5 The added decision-making authorities portion of the description goes beyond the scope of the doctrinal definition but is vague in terms of defining the decisionmaking role of the battle captain. In order to provide a common reference point, the doctrinal (MCRP 5-12A) definition of the term battle captain will be used for the purpose of this paper. Duties To standardize the billet there needs to be a common understanding of what duties a battle captain is expected to perform. Although there may not be total agreement on the definition of a battle captain, there is a general consensus that the responsibilities of the senior watch officer and information manager must be encompassed in the billet. Simply stated, a senior watch officer must ensure the smooth operation of the COC during his or her shift. He or she is in charge of synchronizing the efforts of representatives from the separate staff sections (operations, logistics, intelligence, fires, etc.) to allow for a common tactical 5 Battle Captain Primer, 3. 5

picture 6 and monitoring progress towards mission accomplishment. The senior watch officer must ensure that the operations center functions properly to provide continuity between shifts and maintain momentum during operations. To do this, the flow of information entering, getting processed, and exiting the COC must be effectively managed. The information manager supervises the information flow within the COC and ensures the situational awareness of the commander and primary staff. He must coordinate procedures necessary to share quality information generated by the staff and promote the development and exchange of knowledge required by the commander to make decisions. 7 As a starting point, the Marine Corps can look to the Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL) Newsletter No. 95-7 to spell out duties for a battle captain. Although not all encompassing, the Army does a good job at providing specific guidance for the role of their battle captain operating in tactical operations centers. Battle Captain: The role of the battle captain is similar to that of the XO. The battle captain assists the XO in synchronizing and coordinating the staff's effort. The distinction between the two individuals lies in their level of experience. During the battle, synchronizing and coordinating the staff is normally best served by the XO. 6 Common tactical picture (CTP)- refers to the current depiction of the battlespace for a single operation within an area of responsibility. 7 United States Marine Corps, MCWP 3-40.2 Information Management, 2002 (Washington D.C.: HQMC, 2002), 2-2. 6

During the preparation phase, the battle captain can normally fulfill these duties. Experience at the CTCs shows that during the battle, the battle captain should focus his efforts on supervising the soldiers within the S3 operations cell, rather than synchronizing the efforts of other staff members. Additional duties of the battle captain include: Supervising the efforts of staff NCO's within the S3 section. Conducting analysis and assessment of available information. Assisting in the review and dissemination of information within the TOC. Assisting in monitoring the location and activities of friendly units. Serving as the TOC OIC during the absence of field grade officers. Assisting the S3 during the TDMP. 8 Additional guidance can be drawn from the MCWP 5-12A definition of battle captain in which the role is delineated as a facilitator to prevent the battle captain from veering into the commander s realm with tasking authority (unless otherwise dictated by the commander). Regardless of the definition, the commander of the unit will always retain the ability to empower his Marines based on his confidence in and experience with the individual. Employment Until there is an official T/O billet for a battle captain there will always be the requirement to source the role/function internally. If the Marine is internally sourced, he/she will 8 Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL) Newsletter No. 95-7, Tactical Operations Center (TOC), 1995 (Fort Leavenworth, KS: TRADOC, 1995), 8. 7

have to be professionally developed through the ranks to build credibility with the unit and the commander. Ideally he/she would have experience and training operating in a COC and also have an understanding of fire support coordination and maneuver operations to facilitate his/her situational awareness and decisionmaking abilities. At the battalion level there are three individuals who have the experience, knowledge and ability to carry out the responsibilities of the battle captain: The assistant operations officer, assistant fire support coordinator, and assistant intelligence officer. What these individuals will lack is the knowledge gained through previous experience. For example, a battle captain with operational experience is better equipped to anticipate a commander s needs and have a better understanding of the situation. On a battalion staff, a battle captain would ideally be a prior company commander with established credibility in the unit. An exception to the internally sourced billet may be a staff augment from higher headquarters. While the Marine may lack the credibility in the unit, he would still be required to meet the other requisites before being assigned the billet. In all of the options, the battle captain will have varying tactical COC experience. In order to mitigate this 8

inexperience, a basic training package must be implemented to prepare the Marine for the billet. Training With the current operational tempo as high as it is there may be little time to devote to training battle captains specifically. With that said there is a necessity to prepare the Marine for the position instead of setting him up for failure. To pare down the training to a minimum and still produce favorable returns, the training needs to be focused in specific areas: communication and network operating systems (as it applies to the common tactical picture ), the Marine Corps Planning Process, information management, and battle drills. Due to the technological dependence of most COCs, training in communication and network operating systems is necessary for the battle captain to create a common tactical picture for the commander. He or she must be familiar with all the systems to ensure they are being used correctly and efficiently to increase the situational awareness of all involved. Having a solid background in the Marine Corps Planning Process will aid the battle captain in understanding how tools he may use, such as the decision support matrix, are created. This will also allow him to participate in operational planning 9

teams and will increase his awareness to situations with which he may be associated with. Most Marines are not trained in information management and although most Expeditionary Warfare School graduates receive the designation, they will have not operated in a COC as an information manager. Specific training is needed in information management as it applies to techniques and procedures within a combat operations center. Finally, battle drill training is arguably more valuable than the other training discussed. Through scenario-based training the battle captain can rehearse the procedures that need to be taken to respond to probable situations. This will also provide him with the needed experience operating in a COC and working with a staff. All of the training can be integrated with the current predeployment training packages so as not to take away from other training. However any training would be an improvement over the training currently provided. Conclusion The battle captain is an integral position within a combat operations center and can play a major role in the effectiveness and efficiency of the COC. In order to employ the position consistently within the Marine Corps, the organization must 10

agree on a baseline definition and expectation of the position. The doctrinal definition lends itself to this end, but because of the infancy of the concept many Marine Corps units have taken freedom in defining and employing the position. Moreover, no Marine Corps battle captain training program currently exists. For the Marine Corps to have universal buy in for and employment of the battle captain concept, it must improve the way it selects, trains, and employs its battle captains. Word Count: 1869 11

Bibliography Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL) Newsletter No. 95-7, Tactical Operations Center (TOC), 1995. Fort Leavenworth, KS: TRADOC, 1995. de Oliveira, CPT Marcus F., WHAT NOW BATTLE CAPTAIN? The Who, What and How of the Job on Nobody s Books, but Found in Every Unit s TOC, Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL), <https://call2.army.mil/products/ctcbulletins/asp/ct2qfy95/ctcchap1.asp> (27 September 2005). Expeditionary Warfare School, EWS Battle Captain Primer, 2005. Quantico, VA: 2005. Headquarters Department of the Army, Operational Terms and Graphics, 2004. Washington D.C.: 2004. Murphy, CPT Robert, A concept for Information Management, Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL), May 1996 <https://call2.army.mil/products/nftf/asp/1996/may96-3.asp> (23 November 2005). United States Marine Corps, MCWP 3-40.2 Information Management, 2002, Washington D.C.: HQMC, 2002. Wampler, Richard L., James Centric, Margaret S. Salter, The Brigade Battle Captain- A Prototype Training Product, U.S Army Research Institute, June 1998 <https://www.infantry.army.mil/arifb/research/report%20summa ry/1998/the%20brigade%20battle%20captain.html> (27 September 2005). 12