TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1.2 Market Overview Introduction Industry Drivers Market Size 1-5

Similar documents
Outsourcing biopharmaceuticals manufacturing Best practices when working with external supply partners

Ernst & Young Schedule H Benchmark Report for the American Hospital Association Tax Years 2009 & 2010

Prepared for North Gunther Hospital Medicare ID August 06, 2012

Results of the Clatsop County Economic Development Survey

OUTSOURCING SURVEY. This year we had 315 industry professionals respond

APPENDIX D CHECKLIST FOR PROPOSALS

IT Outsourcing Contracts: Crunching the Numbers

2018 NEW HAMPSHIRE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE (NHEC) COMMERCIAL WEATHERIZATION PROGRAM

Technical Report No. 68 Risk-Based Approach for Prevention and Management of Drug Shortages

Procedure 26 Standard Operating Procedure for Controlled Drugs in homes within NHS Sutton CCG

Life Sciences Tax Incentive Program

VICTORIAN INDUSTRY PARTICIPATION POLICY (VIPP) SUPPLIER GUIDELINES

Request for Proposals (RFP) for Electric Bicycle Manufacturers and Shops for the Intermountain Drives Electric Program and Live Electric Program

1 - PROJECT DETAILS 1.1 PROMOTER S INFORMATION. Title and full name of main contact: Position: Investment and Economic Initiatives Manager

Bristol Myers Squibb Holdings Pharma., Ltd.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) CONFERENCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES. US Composting Council. January 3, Submission Due Date: February 3, 2012

Call for Projects LIRA 13

BOTHELL BIOMEDICAL MANUFACTURING INNOVATION PARTNERSHIP ZONE

THE FOOD ACADEMY START PROGRAMME (Dublin Region) 2017 Local Enterprise Offices: Dublin City, Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown, Fingal, South Dublin

Life Sciences Tax Incentive Program

Indirect Cost Policy

Policy Rules for the ORIO Grant Facility

The 3E Principle of Outsourcing

Measuring the Cost of Patient Care in a Massachusetts Health Center Environment 2012 Financial Data

Request for Proposals and Specifications for a Community Solar Project

Latin America: An Evolving Regulatory Environment September 15, Mapi 2015, All Rights Reserved

Request for Proposals (RFP) Moving office furniture from building 3A to building 22 and other CSIR store areas (in building 35 and 36)

Atreca Inc - Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare - Deals and Alliances Profile

To establish a consistent process for the activity of an independent double-check prior to medication administration, where appropriate.

Outsourcing: Building Successful Strategies

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Paint Stewardship Program Public Awareness Study

Georgia Lottery Corporation ("GLC") PROPOSAL. PROPOSAL SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION (Authorized representative must sign and return with proposal)

Table of Contents. Overview. Demographics Section One

Patent Assistance Program

PHA 5104 Dosage Forms & Contemporary Pharmacy Practice 2 Semester Credit Hours

SOLAR SURVEY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, Summary of Key Findings

Singapore Semiconductor Industry Association

Association of Consulting Engineering Companies of PEI

Outsourcing Risk Management. UniCredit Group Experience

SAMPLE DOCUMENT. Implementation or operational plan

Ontario College of Trades

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Good Practices & Principles FIFARMA, I. Government s cost containment measures: current status & issues

Serving the Community Well:

Request for Proposal PROFESSIONAL AUDIT SERVICES

OUTSOURCING IN 2010 RECENT TRENDS & KEY ISSUES FOR IRISH BUSINESSES

Sponsorship guidance for all accredited activities

Forward Looking Statements

Global IT-BPO Outsourcing Deals Analysis 1Q15 Analysis: January to March

Request for Proposals. For. Clinical Skills Assessment Pilot Project

Presentation Objectives

Management of medicines shortages in Ireland

Better Health Care for all Floridians. July 13, 2012

Announcement of methodological change

THE CPA AUSTRALIA ASIA-PACIFIC SMALL BUSINESS SURVEY 2016

Unified Communications Improves Business Outcomes, Lowers Costs, and Enhances Environmental Sustainability

Request for Proposal for Digitizing Document Services and Document Management Solution RFP-DOCMANAGESOLUTION1

TYRE STEWARDSHIP AUSTRALIA. Tyre Stewardship Research Fund Guidelines. Round 2. Project Stream

Economic Impact of the University of Edinburgh s Commercialisation Activity

2016 Edition. Upper Payment Limits and Medicaid Capitation Rates for Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE )

AGENCY WORK BUSINESS INDICATOR: DECEMBER 2016 EVOLUTION OF NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED BY AGENCY WORKERS IN EUROPE. Oct Oct 2016

Request for Proposals (RFP)

San Diego Tourism Marketing District Metrics for Returns on Investment (ROI)

CAMPBELL UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development

Regulatory Submissions Trends Survey 2002 Ellen Semple Date received (in revised form): 18th March, 2003

PHILADELPHIA ENERGY AUTHORITY

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Manpower Employment Outlook Survey Ireland. A Manpower Research Report

Guidelines for the Major Eligible Employer Grant Program

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

AUSSEN WIRTSCHAFT LANDING ZONE GO-BOSTON BEWERBUNG

MSCRF Discovery Program

Request for Proposals (RFP) The provision of Media Monitoring and Analyses services to the CSIR. RFP No. 770/09/06/2017

Client name:... Billing name:... Address:... address:... ABN/ACN:... Contact name:... Phone number:... Cost register (office use):...

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ON-SITE VISITS BY PEERS AND SELECTION CRITERIA FOR ON-SITE VISIT PEER REVIEWERS

Administration of IV Medication in the Community by the Children s Community Nursing Team Standard Operating Procedure

U.S. Hiring Trends Q3 2015:

Aboriginal Community Capital Grants Program Guide

$1,500,000 Available

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program and Triennial DBE Goal Setting Methodology and Rationale

LORD MAYOR S GLOBAL ENTREPRENEUR 2018 PROGRAM A N INITI A T I VE OF DIGIT A L BRISBA N E AN D THE C ITY S DIGIT A L S T R A TEG Y

Guidelines for Development and Reimbursement of Originating Site Fees for Maryland s Telepsychiatry Program

Request for Quotation (RFQ) Solicitation Overview

THE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS BA 4308: ENTREPRENEURSHIP ROOM: SOM THURSDAY 7:00 9:45 PM FALL 05

STATE OF MAINE Department of Economic and Community Development Office of Community Development

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 11 th August, A Strategy for the Atlantic Canadian Aerospace and Defence Sector for a Long-term Development Plan

Reducing the High Cost of Patient Non-Adherence:

Caution: DRAFT NOT FOR FILING

The Language Services Market: 2013

The 2017 Best 50 Corporate Citizens in Canada: Methodology

Specialised Therapeutics Australia Pty. Ltd. - Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare - Deals and Alliances Profile

Justification Toolkit

Request for Proposal. Mobile Application for Customer Interface. October 6 th, 2017 Procurement Contact Holly Hussey

Regional Growth Fund Frequently Asked Questions

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Millcreek Request for Proposals Website Design Services Due Date and Time: February 21, 2017, 5:00 p.m.

Request for Proposal PROFESSIONAL AUDIT SERVICES. Luzerne-Wyoming Counties Mental Health/Mental Retardation Program

The spoke before the hub

Direct Hire Agency Benchmarking Report

Transcription:

TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction 1-1 1.2 Market Overview 1-2 1.2.1 Introduction 1-2 1.2.2 Industry Drivers 1-3 1.2.3 Market Size 1-5 1.3 Summary of Customer Needs 1-6 1.3.1 Products 1-6 1.3.2 Outsourcing Strategies 1-8 1.3.3 Outsourcing Budgets 1-9 1.4 Summary of Fill-and-Finish Contractors Capabilities 1-10 1.4.1 Dosage Forms 1-11 1.4.2 Capacity Increases 1-12 1.4.3 Industry and Company Growth Rates 1-13 1.4.4 Contracting Business by Product Type 1-14 1.5 Industry Trends and Observations 1-15 Chapter 2: METHODOLOGY, DEFINITIONS, AND ACRONYMS 2.1 Research Objectives 2-1 2.2 Research Methodology 2-2 2.3 Definition of Parenteral Fill-and-Finish Manufacturing 2-4 2.4 Box-and-Whiskers Plot Definition 2-4 2.5 Acronyms 2-5 Chapter 3: FILL-AND-FINISH CONTRACT MANUFACTURING: MARKET OVERVIEW 3.1 Introduction 3-1 3.2 Suppliers: The Fill-and-Finish Contract Manufacturers 3-2 3.2.1 Types of Fill-and-Finish Contract Companies 3-2 3.2.2 Fill-and-Finish Contract Manufacturing Companies 3-3 3.2.3 Dosage Forms and Services 3-5 3.2.4 Fill-and-Finish Contract Manufacturing Organizations 3-7 Capacities

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Chapter 3: 3.3 The Customers: Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology 3-9 Companies 3.3.1 Customers Products 3-9 3.3.2 Outsourced Fill-and-Finish by Dosage Form 3-10 3.3.3 Customers Future Outsourcing Expectations 3-11 3.3.4 Outsourcing Needs 3-12 3.4 Market Capacity 3-14 3.5 Market Size 3-15 3.5.1 Estimates of Market Size Based on Customer Spending 3-15 3.5.2 Estimates of Market Size Based on Contractor Revenues 3-17 3.5.3 Market Size by Dosage Form and Service Categories 3-17 3.6 Market Growth Forecasts 3-18 3.7 Trends in the Fill-and-Finish Contract Manufacturing 3-20 Market 3.7.1 Industry Opportunities and Challenges 3-20 3.7.2 Overall Industry Trends 3-21 Chapter 4: PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOTECHNOLOGY COMPANIES: CLIENT ANALYSIS 4.1 Introduction 4-1 4.1.1 Respondent Titles and Location 4-1 4.1.2 In-House Manufacturing Sites 4-2 4.1.3 Recombinant Large-Molecule Drug Products on Market 4-4 4.2 Manufacturing Demand 4-5 4.2.1 Manufacturing Needs 4-5 4.2.2 Dosage Forms 4-11 4.2.3 Clinical and Commercial Products 4-13 4.3 Manufacturing Technologies 4-17 4.3.1 Planned Format for Drug Launch 4-17 4.3.2 New Delivery Technologies 4-19 4.3.3 Special Handling Requirements 4-23 4.3.4 Yield Loss 4-27

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Chapter 4: 4.4 Outsourcing Strategies 4-32 4.4.1 Current In-House Filling Capacity and Outsourcing 4-32 Strategy 4.4.2 Changes to In-House Filling Capacity 4-38 4.4.3 Impact of Core/Non-Core Technology 4-41 4.4.4 Impact of Standard/Non-Standard Technology 4-45 4.4.5 Focus of Filling Outsourcing over Next 5 Years 4-48 4.5 Outsourcing Needs 4-52 4.5.1 Outsourced Services 4-52 4.5.2 Areas Underserved by Fill-and-Finish CMOs 4-54 4.5.3 Key Challenges a Fill-and-Finish CMO Can Help 4-60 Alleviate 4.6 Contractor Selection 4-65 4.6.1 Essential Characteristics Sought in a F&F Contractor 4-65 4.6.2 Key Components for Successful Collaboration with a 4-72 Fill-and-Finish CMO 4.6.3 Regional Outsourcing Preference 4-76 4.6.4 Opinion of Emerging Market CMOs 4-79 4.7 Contractor Pricing 4-84 4.7.1 Price Models Used 4-84 4.7.2 Fee Structure: Technology Transfer 4-88 4.7.3 Fee Structure: Reservation 4-92 4.7.4 Fee Structure: Cancelation 4-95 4.8 Outsourced Spending 4-100 4.8.1 Prices Paid to Fill-and-Finish CMOs 4-100 4.8.2 Outsourcing Budgets 4-105 4.8.3 Outsourcing Budgets by Service Category 4-108 4.9 Contractor Relationships 4-112 4.9.1 Identifying Contract Partners 4-112 4.9.2 Preferred Contractors 4-114 4.9.3 Top Concerns of Contractors Meeting Expectations 4-116 4.9.4 Warranties, Guarantees and Indemnifications 4-120 4.9.5 Ideal Production Network or Alliance Structure 4-123 4.10 Future Trends and Expectations 4-129 4.10.1 Regulatory Requirement Challenges 4-129 4.10.2 Future F&F Manufacturing Challenges and Bottlenecks 4-132 4.10.3 Future Technology and Operational Trends 4-137 4.10.4 Future Trends in Biopharmaceutical Fill-and-Finish 4-145 Contract Manufacturing

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Chapter 5: FILL-AND-FINISH CONTRACT MANUFACTURERS 5.1 Introduction 5-1 5.1.1 Respondents Titles and Experience 5-1 5.1.2 Company Locations 5-2 5.1.3 Regulatory Approval Status 5-3 5.1.4 One-Stop-Shop CMO Model 5-4 5.2 Capacity 5-8 5.2.1 Dosage Forms 5-8 5.2.2 Current Capacity for Fill-and-Finish 5-10 5.2.3 Current Capacity for Lyophilization 5-13 5.2.4 Capacity Expansions 5-15 5.3 Manufacturing Practices 5-17 5.3.1 Contracting Business by Product Type 5-17 5.3.2 Current and Future Capacity Utilization 5-19 5.3.3 Average Batch Size and Batches per Fill Line 5-21 5.3.4 Number of Employees by Function 5-24 5.3.5 Cost Reduction Plans 5-25 5.4 Manufacturing Technologies 5-28 5.4.1 Technology Impacts on Operations 5-28 5.4.2 Average Yield Loss 5-30 5.4.3 Focus of Capabilities in Next 5 Years 5-32 5.5 Pricing 5-35 5.5.1 Price Structures for Fill-and-Finish 5-35 5.5.2 Batch Pricing 5-38 5.5.3 Contractors Technology Transfer Fees 5-40 5.5.4 Contractors Reservation Fees 5-43 5.5.5 Contractors Cancellation Fees 5-44 5.5.6 Gross Profit Margin 5-46 5.6 Customer Relationships 5-47 5.6.1 Strengths and Weaknesses of Contract Manufacturers 5-47 5.6.2 Competitive Attributes 5-51 5.6.3 Warranties, Guarantees and Indemnifications 5-53 5.6.4 Production Networks or Alliances 5-56 5.6.5 Trade Shows 5-59

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Chapter 5: 5.7 Fill-and-Finish Industry Revenues and Growth 5-61 5.7.1 Opportunities for Growth in the Fill-and-Finish Industry 5-61 5.7.2 Industry and Company Growth Rates 5-64 5.7.3 Current and Expected Revenue Categories 5-66 5.7.4 Revenues from Industry Segments 5-68 5.7.5 Revenues from World Regions 5-70 5.8 Challenges and Future Trends for F&F Manufacturing 5-71 5.8.1 Most Significant Challenges/Threats 5-71 5.8.2 Regulatory Requirement Challenges 5-74 5.8.3 Potential Growth Areas 5-76 5.8.4 Trends for the Future of F&F Contract Manufacturing 5-78 Appendix A: Write-Ups of Interviews with 26 Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Company BioManufacturing Directors Worldwide, Unnamed and Edited for Confidentiality Appendix B: Directory of Biopharmaceutical Fill-and-Finish Contract Manufacturers Appendix C: Interview Guide for Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Company Respondents Appendix D: Interview Guide for Biopharmaceutical Fill-and-Finish Contract Manufacturers

LIST OF TABLES Chapter 1 1.2-1 Biopharmaceutical Fill-and-Finish Contract Manufacturing Industry 1-4 Capacity Estimate in Units 1.3-1 Respondents Capacity by Segment 1-8 1.3-2 Outsource Decision Criterion 1-9 1.4-1 Fill Line Expansion Plans 1-13 1.5-1 Industry Trends and Challenges 1-16 Chapter 2 2.2-1 Market Research Steps 2-2 2.5-1 Acronyms 2-5 Chapter 3 3.2-1 Rating of Respondents Fill-and-Finish Contract Manufacturers 3-4 3.2-2 CMO Revenue Mix by Service Category: 2015 3-7 3.2-3 Biopharmaceutical F&F Contract Manufacturing Industry Capacity 3-8 Estimates in Units 3.3-1 Estimates of Needs for Outsourced Volumes for the Respondent Group 3-13 3.4-1 Biopharmaceutical F&F Outsourced Manufacturing Capacity Utilization 3-15 3.5-1 Worldwide 2015 Market Size for Biopharmaceutical Fill-and-Finish 3-16 Contract Manufacturing: Estimates Based on Customer Spending: US$ 3.5-2 Worldwide 2015 Market Size for Biopharmaceutical Fill-and-Finish 3-17 Contract Manufacturing: Estimates Based on Contractors Revenues: US$ 3.5-3 Market Size by Dosage Forms: US$ 3-17 3.5-4 Market Size by Service Category: US$ 3-18 3.7-1 Observations on Biopharmaceutical Fill-and-Finish Contract Manufacturing 3-21 Industry Trends: Manufacturing Trends Chapter 4 4.1-1 Titles of Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Company Respondents 4-2 4.1-2 Location of In-House Fill-and-Finish Manufacturing Sites 4-4 4.1-3 Number of Recombinant Large-Molecule Drug Products on Market 4-4

LIST OF TABLES (continued) Chapter 4 4.2-1 Respondents Current and Expected Capacity Needs for Outsourced 4-6 Product Vials (Lyophilized) 4.2-2 Respondents Current and Expected Capacity Needs for Outsourced 4-7 Product Vials (Not Lyophilized) 4.2-3 Respondents Current and Expected Capacity Needs for Outsourced 4-8 Products Syringes (Lyophilized) 4.2-4 Respondents Current and Expected Capacity Needs for Outsourced 4-9 Products Syringes (Not Lyophilized) 4.2-5 Respondents Current and Expected Capacity Needs for Outsourced 4-9 Products Cartridge (Not Lyophilized) 4.2-6 Number of Outsourced Products by Phase by Year 4-12 4.2-7 Average Outsourcing Percentage by Dosage Form 4-13 4.2-8 Number of Biopharmaceutical Products Filled by Dosage Form 4-14 4.2-9 Types of Respondents Biopharmaceutical Products by Dosage Form 4-17 4.3-1 Delivery Technologies Under Investigation 4-21 4.3-2 Cause for Fill-and-Finish Yield Losses 4-29 4.4-1 Respondent Capacity by Segment 4-33 4.4-2 Outsource Decision Criterion Respondents with In-House Capacity 4-34 4.4-3 Outsource Decision Criterion Respondents with No In-House Capacity 4-36 4.4-4 Impact of Core Technology on Outsourcing Decision 4-43 4.4-5 Focus of Fill-and-Finish Outsourcing Efforts in Next 5 Years 4-49 4.5-1 Outsourcing of Fill-and-Finish Related Services 4-53 4.5-2 Number of Products Currently and Planned to Outsource by Service 4-54 4.5-3 Areas Underserved by Fill-and-Finish CMOs 4-55 4.5-4 Challenges Fill-and-Finish CMOs can Help Alleviate 4-61 4.6-1 Ranked Characteristics of a Good Service Level at F&F Contractor 4-66 4.6-2 Rationale for Number 1 Ranked Good Service Characteristic 4-68 4.6-3 Key Component for Successful Collaboration 4-72 4.6-4 Regional Outsourcing Preferences 4-77 4.6-5 Observations and Influences on Opinion about Emerging-Market CMOs 4-80 4.7-1 Price Model Used for Fill-and-Finish Services by Respondent Type 4-84 4.7-2 Average Technology Transfer Fees Paid by Dosage Form 4-89 4.8-1 Price Per-Batch by Dosage Form by Product Phase 4-101 4.8-2 Examples of Other Services and Material Charges 4-105 4.8-3 Fill-and-Finish Outsourcing Budgets by Respondent Type: 2015, 2017, 2020 4-107 4.8-4 Simple Average: Percentage of F&F Outsourcing Budget by Service 4-109 4.8-5 Weighted Average: Percentage of F&F Outsourcing Budget by Service 4-111

LIST OF TABLES (continued) Chapter 4 4.9-1 Search Modes for Fill-and-Finish Contractors 4-113 4.9-2 Rating of Respondents Fill-and-Finish Contract Manufacturers 4-115 4.9-3 Top Concerns of Fill-and-Finish Contractors Meeting Expectations 4-116 4.9-4 Warranties, Guarantees and Indemnifications Negotiated by Respondents 4-121 4.9-5 Proposed Models and Arrangements with a CMO 4-125 4.10-1 Regulatory Requirements That Present the Greatest Challenges 4-129 4.10-2 Challenges and Bottlenecks Facing Fill-and-Finish Manufacturing 4-133 4.10-3 Technology Trends in Drug Presentations 4-138 4.10-4 Technology Trends at CMOs 4-139 4.10-5 Operational and Business Trends in Fill-and-Finish Contract Manufacturing 4-140 4.10-6 Future Trends in Biopharmaceutical Fill-and-Finish Contract Manufacturing 4-145 Chapter 5 5.1-1 Titles of Fill-and-Finish Contractor Respondents 5-1 5.1-2 Fill-and-Finish Contractors: Headquarter Locations 5-3 5.1-3 Regulatory Agency Approvals 5-4 5.1-4 Relevance of Being a One-Stop-Shop 5-5 5.2-1 Average Batch Size per Fill Line and Contractor 5-11 5.2-2 Fill Capacity by Batch Size at Respondents Facilities in 2015 5-11 5.2-3 Lyophilizer Capacity by Shelf Space at Respondents Facilities in 2015 5-13 5.2-4 Lyophilizer Capacity by Batch Size at Respondents Facilities in 2015 5-14 5.2-5 Fill Line Expansion Plans 5-16 5.2-6 Lyophilizer Expansion Plans 5-17 5.3-1 Percent of Contracting Business by Product Type: 2015 and 2017 5-18 5.3-2 Capacity Utilization Rate: Fill Line 5-19 5.3-3 Capacity Utilization Rate: Lyophilization 5-21 5.3-4 Number of Batches Ran per Fill Line 5-22 5.3-5 Batch Size Ran by Fill Line 5-23 5.3-6 Number of Employees by Function 5-24 5.3-7 Plans to Reduce Fill-and-Finish Manufacturing Costs 5-26 5.4-1 Technology Impacts on Fill-and-Finish Operations 5-29 5.4-2 Sources of Product Yield Loss 5-31 5.4-3 Focus of Manufacturing Capabilities 5-33 5.5-1 Pricing Methods for Clinical and Commercial Phase 5-37 5.5-2 Calculation Methods of Technology Transfer Fees 5-41 5.5-3 Contractors Cancellation Fees: Average Percentage of Total Project Fee 5-45 5.5-4 Gross Profit Margin 5-46

LIST OF TABLES (continued) Chapter 5 5.6-1 Contract Manufacturers Strengths and Weaknesses 5-48 5.6-2 Contractor Competitive Advantage 5-51 5.6-3 Warranties, Guarantees and Indemnifications Accepted by F&F CMOs 5-54 5.6-4 Desired Arrangements with Clients 5-57 5.6-5 Trade Shows Named by Fill-and-Finish Contractors 5-60 5.6-6 Trade Shows for Best Quality Leads 5-60 5.6-7 Trade Shows for Best Technical Information 5-61 5.7-1 Opportunities for Growth in the Fill-and-Finish Industry 5-62 5.7-2 Annual Growth Rates: Industry Estimate versus Company Forecast 5-64 5.7-3 Revenue by Service Category: 2015 5-66 5.7-4 Revenue Change Expected by Service Category: 2015 to 2017 5-68 5.7-5 Customer Mix 5-69 5.7-6 Geographic Mix 5-70 5.8-1 Future Challenges to Business Operations 5-72 5.8.2 Current Regulatory Challenges 5-74 5.8.3 Potential Fill-and-Finish Manufacturing Growth Areas 5-76 5.8.4 Future Technology Trends 5-78 5.8.5 Future Business Trends 5-79

LIST OF FIGURES Chapter 1 1.2-A Size of Worldwide Biopharmaceutical Fill-and-Finish Contract 1-6 Manufacturing Industry in US$B 1.3-A Respondents 82 Biopharmaceutical Products by Phase 1-7 1.3-B Number of Products Outsourced by Dosage Form: 2015 2020 1-7 1.3-C Simple Average Percentages of Expected Overall Outsourced Budget 1-10 1.4-A Dosage Forms Produced by Number of Contractor Respondents 1-11 1.4-B Percent of Fill Lines Available among Contractor Respondents for Various 1-12 Dosage Forms 1.4-C Annual Growth Rates: Industry Estimate versus Company Forecast 1-14 1.4-D Percent of Contracting Business by Product Type: 2015 and 2017 1-15 Chapter 2 2.4-A Explanation of Box-and-Whiskers Plot 2-5 Chapter 3 3.2-A Dosage Forms Produced by Number of Contractor Respondents 3-5 3.2-B Percent of Fill Lines Available among Contractor Respondents for Various 3-6 Dosage Forms 3.3-A Respondents 82 Biopharmaceutical Products by Phase 3-10 3.3-B Percent of Products Outsourced: 2015 3-11 3.3-C Simple Average Percentages of Expected Overall Outsourcing Budget 3-12 3.3-D Number of Products Outsourced by Dosage Form: 2015 2020 3-13 3.3-E Estimates of Needs for Outsourced Batches for the Worldwide Industry 3-14 3.6-A Size of the Worldwide Biopharmaceutical Fill-and-Finish Contract 3-19 Manufacturing Market in US$B Chapter 4 4.1-A In-House Fill-and-Finish Manufacturing Capability 4-3 4.2-A Summation of Outsourced Units Required Vials 4-10 4.2-B Summation of Outsourced Units Required Syringes 4-11 4.2-C Percentage of Products Outsourced 2015 4-12 4.2-D Number of Respondents Products Produced by Dosage Form 4-15 4.2-E Respondents 82 Biopharmaceutical Products by Phase 4-15 4.2-F Respondents 82 Biopharmaceutical Products by Company Type 4-16 4.3-A Format Used for Drug Product Launch 4-18 4.3-B Investigation of New Delivery Technologies 4-20 4.3-C Needle-Based versus Needle-Free Delivery Technologies Under 4-21 Investigation

LIST OF FIGURES (continued) Chapter 4 4.3-D Respondents Special Handling Requirements 4-23 4.3-E Distribution of Percent of Products with Special Handling Needs 4-24 4.3-F Special Handling Needs Required 4-25 4.3-G Handling Needs for Typical Biologics 4-25 4.3-H Distribution of Average Fill-and-Finish Yield Losses 4-28 4.4-A Distribution of Respondents with In-House Capacity 4-32 4.4-B Changes to In-House Filling Capacity 4-38 4.4-C Core Technology s Impact on Outsourcing Decisions 4-41 4.4-D Standard Technology s Impact on Outsourcing Decisions 4-46 4.6-A Number 1 Ranked Good Service Characteristics 4-65 4.6-B Most Important Good Service Characteristics by Weighted Ranking 4-67 4.6-C Changing Opinion about Emerging-Market CMOs 4-79 4.7-A Different Price Model Used for Commercial Products 4-85 4.7-B Average Technology Transfer Fees Paid by Respondent Type 4-89 4.7-C Payment of Reservation Fee 4-93 4.7-D When Cancellation Charges are First Expected to be Incurred 4-96 4.7-E Cancellation Fees: Average Percentages of the Total Contract Fee 4-97 4.8-A Average Per-Batch Price by Clinical Phase 4-102 4.8-B Unit Price versus Batch Size: Non-Lyophilization 4-102 4.8-C Unit Price versus Batch Size: Lyophilization 4-103 4.8-D Price per Batch by SafeBridge Level: Vials 4-104 4.8-E Price per Batch by SafeBridge Level: Prefilled Syringes 4-104 4.8-F Average Fill-and-Finish Outsourcing Budgets by Respondent Type 4-108 4.8-G Simple Average: Percentage of F&F Outsourcing Budget by Service: 2015 4-110 4.8-H Weighted Average: Percentage of F&F Outsourcing Budget by Service 2015 4-112 4.9-A Search Modes for Fill-and-Finish CMOs 4-113 4.9-B Warranties, Guarantees and Indemnifications 4-122 4.9-C Negotiation of Contractor s Final Product Quality and Consequential 4-123 Damages 4.9-D Preference for Production Networks or Alliances 4-124 4.9-E Preferred Characteristics of Production Networks or Alliances 4-125 Chapter 5 5.1-A Number of Years Fill-and-Finish Services Offered 5-2 5.1-B One-Stop-Shop CMO Model 5-5 5.2-A Dosage Forms Produced by Percent of Contractors Respondents 5-8 5.2-B Percent of Fill Lines Available among Contractor Respondents for Various 5-9 Dosage Forms 5.2-C Comparison of Percent of Dosage Forms Produced by Contractor Type 5-10 5.2-D Capacity Expansion Plans 5-15 5.2-E Dosage Forms Being Added 5-16

LIST OF FIGURES (continued) Chapter 5 5.3-A Percent of Contracting Business by Product Type: 2015 and 2017 5-18 5.3-B Fill Line Capacity Utilization Rate 5-20 5.3-C Lyophilization Capacity Utilization Rates 5-21 5.3-D Average Number of Employees by Function 5-25 5.3-E Plans to Reduce Fill-and-Finish Manufacturing Costs 5-26 5.4-A Average Yield Loss 5-31 5.5-A Pricing Methods 5-35 5.5-B Use of Different Pricing Methods Based on Product Phase 5-36 5.5-C Dosage Form 5-39 5.5-D Batch Size 5-39 5.5-E Batch Pricing 5-40 5.5-F Technology Transfer Fee Charged 5-41 5.5-G Reservation Fee Charged 5-43 5.5-H When Cancellation Fees Are First Charged 5-44 5.5-I Average Targeted and Achieved Gross Profit Margins 5-47 5.6-A Warranties, Guarantees and Indemnifications Accepted by F&F CMOs 5-55 5.6-B Comparison of CMO and Pharma Respondents Always Negotiation Term 5-56 5.6-C Plans for Production Network or Alliances with Clients 5-57 5.7-A Average Annual Growth Rates: Industry Estimate versus Company Forecast 5-65 5.7-B Service Revenue by Contractor Type: 2015 5-67 5.7-C Revenue Contribution from Customer Groups by Contractor Type 5-69 5.7-D Percentage of Business from the World Regions by Contractor Type 5-71