Air Education and Training Command

Similar documents
Occupational Survey Report AFSC 4A1X1 Medical Materiel

Air Education and Training Command

Occupational Survey Report AFSC 1C0X1 Airfield Management

Occupational Survey Report AFSC 4H0X1 Cardiopulmonary Laboratory

Air Education and Training Command

Occupational Survey Report AFSC 1T0X1 Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape Operations

Occupational Survey Report AFSC 4A0X1 Health Services Management

Air Education and Training Command

Air Education and Training Command

U&TW Briefing. Air Education and Training Command. Manpower AFSC 3U0X1, 38MX & Management and Program Analysis OS 343

Air Education and Training Command

Air Education and Training Command

Air Education and Training Command

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

Wildland Fire Assistance

OCCUPATIONAL SURVEY REPORT

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

USAF Hearing Conservation Program, DOEHRS Data Repository Annual Report: CY2012

Impact of Corrosion on Ground Vehicles: Program Review, Issues and Solutions

USAF TECHNICAL TRAINING NAS Pensacola Florida Develop America's Airmen Today --- for Tomorrow

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

OCCUPATIONAL SURVEY REPORT

OCCUPATIONAL SURVEY REPORT

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Financial Management

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

MK 83 WARHEAD EFFECTIVENESS TESTS

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Report Documentation Page

Joint Basing and Explosives Safety from the US Navy Perspective

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

MCAS BEAUFORT SUSTAINABLE RANGES BRIEF MCAS BEAUFORT COMMUNITY PLANS AND LIAISON OFFICE (CP&L)

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Mission Task Analysis for the NATO Defence Requirements Review

Conservation Law Enforcement Program Standardization

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Report No. DODIG Department of Defense AUGUST 26, 2013

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

SIMULATOR SYSTEMS GROUP

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) Patient Care Platform: Expanding Global Applications and Impact

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

AMCOM Corrosion Program

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Development of a Hover Test Bed at the National Hover Test Facility

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Tannis Danley, Calibre Systems. 10 May Technology Transition Supporting DoD Readiness, Sustainability, and the Warfighter. DoD Executive Agent

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

The Security Plan: Effectively Teaching How To Write One

Defense Acquisition Review Journal


A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

Military Health System Conference. Public Health Service (PHS) Commissioned Corps

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

The Use of Sikes Act Cooperative Agreements for Implementing INRMP Projects

Choose to Lose. Tammy Lindberg, Lt Col, USAF, BSC

C-Band Working Group Update. Steve O'Neal AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 2/20/13

U.S. Army Reserve Base Realignment & Closure (BRAC) Sustainable Design & Construction in Action

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

at the Missile Defense Agency

Tim Haithcoat Deputy Director Center for Geospatial Intelligence Director Geographic Resources Center / MSDIS

Report No. DODIG December 5, TRICARE Managed Care Support Contractor Program Integrity Units Met Contract Requirements

Environmental Trends Course Cultural Resources

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

Improving Safety of Demil Operations Through Automation. Mark M. Zaugg July 14, 2010

Transcription:

Air Education and Training Command Sustaining the Combat Capability of America s Air Force Occupational Survey Report AFSC VEHICLE OPERATIONS Adriana G. Rodriguez 12 May 2004 I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 12 MAY 2004 2. REPORT TYPE N/A 3. DATES COVERED - 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Occupational Survey Report AFSC Vehicle Operations 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Air Force Occupational Measurement Squadron Randolph AFB, TX 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADM001681, Occupational Analyis Products: Vehicle Operations - AFSC., The original document contains color images. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UU a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 38 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Air Force Occupational Measurement SQ AFOMS/OA 1550 Fifth Street East Randolph AFB, TX 78150 DSN 487 6811 https://www-r.omsq.af.mil/oa/oaproducts.htm I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Overview Survey background Survey results Implications 3

Executive Summary Homogeneous job structure with two clusters and five independent jobs identified Typical career ladder progression Career ladder documents supported by survey data Job satisfaction indicators are generally positive 4

Work Performed Perform and manage vehicle operations activities Perform dispatch duties Provide customer service and issue driver s licenses Perform pickup and delivery activities 5

Current Training Program AFSC-awarding course 366 TRS, Fort Leonard Wood MO J3ABP2T131-000, Vehicle Operator Apprentice Course, 6 weeks 9 semester hours for CCAF Programmed TPR Programmed Elimination Rate FY04: 500 students FY04: 1% FY05: 530 students FY05: 1% 6

Survey Background Last Occupational Survey Report (OSR): June 1999 Current survey developed: May - June 2003 Fort Leonard Wood MO Vandenberg AFB CA Charleston AFB SC Shaw AFB SC Eglin AFB FL Hurlburt Fld FL Randolph AFB TX VEHICLE OPERATIONS MAY 2004 (Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited) 7

Survey Background (Cont.) Survey initiated to obtain data to: Evaluate current classification and training documents Support promotion test development Current survey data collected: July-December 2003 Components surveyed: Active Duty: 3-, 5-, 7-, and 9-Skill Levels Guard: 3-, 5-, and 7-Skill Levels Reserve: 3-, 5-, 7-, and 9-Skill Levels VEHICLE OPERATIONS MAY 2004 (Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited) 8

Survey Sample Characteristics AD ANG AFRC Total Assigned* 2,448 937 420 3,805 Mailed Out 2,187 883 393 3,463 Sample 1,354 249 97 1,700 Usable Returns 62% 28% 25% 49% Average time in career field for AD: 7 years 3 months Average TAFMS for AD: 7 years 7 months Percent of AD in first enlistment: 37% * Assigned as of July 2003 9

Paygrade Distribution Assigned* Sample E-1 - E-3 20% 22% E-4 20% 19% E-5 32% 33% E-6 19% 19% E-7 8% 7% E-8 1% 1% E-9 ** ** *Assigned as of July 2003 **Indicates less than 1% ***Note: Columns may not add up to 100% due to rounding 10

Command Representation Command Assigned %** Sample % ANG 25 15 ACC 19 25 AMC 11 14 AFRC 11 6 PACAF 10 11 AETC 10 9 USAFE 6 9 AFMC 5 5 AFSPC 3 3 AFSOC 1 2 11 th Wing 1 2 *Assigned as of July 2003 **Note: Columns may not add up to 100% due to rounding 11

Specialty Clusters and Jobs TRAINING IJ (4%) (N=1,700) MANAGEMENT/ SUPERVISION CLUSTER (8%) *OTHER (6%) NOT GROUPED (9%) VEHICLE OPERATIONS CLUSTER (73%) *Other includes: -REGISTERED EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT (REM) IJ (2%) -FLEET MANAGEMENT IJ (1%) -LICENSING AND RECORDS IJ (1%) -SUPPLY AND EQUIPMENT SUPPORT IJ (2%) 12

VEHICLE OPERATIONS CLUSTER (N=1,240) Clean vehicle exteriors or interiors Transport passengers, other than DVs Dispatch vehicles for transportation Maintain administrative files or records Provide DV support Receive transportation requests Verify vehicle forms, such as accident, inspection, and waiver Inspect vehicles released from maintenance facilities Counsel subordinates concerning personal matters Entry-Level Vehicle Operations Job Vehicle Operations Job NCOIC, Dispatch Support Job Vehicle Control Job Pickup and Delivery Job Dispatch Operations Job 73% 73% 13

MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION CLUSTER (N=141) Counsel subordinates concerning personal matters Write recommendations for awards or decorations Conduct supervisory performance feedback sessions Conduct general meetings, such as staff meetings, briefings, conferences, or workshops Inspect personnel for compliance with military standards Assign personnel to work areas or duty positions Determine or establish work assignments or priorities Evaluate personnel for compliance with performance standards Management and Supervision Job NCOIC, Vehicle Operations Job 8% 14

Independent Jobs LICENSING AND RECORDS IJ (N=18) Issue or update AF Forms 2293 (U.S. Air Force Motor Vehicle Operator Identification Card) Process AF Forms 171 (Request for Driver s Training and Addition to U.S. Government Drivers License) Maintain AF Forms 2296 (Vehicle Operator Information) FLEET MANAGEMENT IJ (N=11) Conduct vehicle control function staff assistance visits Conduct vehicle control function staff assistance analysis Develop and maintain base VCO lists 1% 1% 15

Independent Jobs (Cont.) REGISTERED EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT (REM) IJ (N=41) Maintain vehicle authorization listings (VALs) Maintain or update custody authorization/custody receipt listings Maintain vehicle fleet records TRAINING IJ (N=71) Conduct on-the-job training Counsel trainees on training progress Maintain training records or files 2% 4% 16

Independent Jobs (Cont.) SUPPLY AND EQUIPMENT SUPPORT IJ (N=36) - Identify and report equipment or supply problems - Evaluate serviceability of equipment, tools, parts, or supplies - Coordinate maintenance of facilities with dispatch support 1% 17

Percent Across Specialty Clusters and Jobs by DAFSC DAFSC DAFSC DAFSC DAFSC 2T131 2T151 2T171 2T191 SPECIALTY JOBS (N=509) (N=651) (N=175) (N=19) VEHICLE OPERATIONS CLUSTER 84 62 27 0 SUPPLY AND EQUIPMENT SUPPORT IJ 1 4 2 0 LICENSING AND RECORDS IJ 2 2 1 0 FLEET MANAGEMENT IJ 1 1 0 0 REGISTERED EQUIPMENT * 4 10 0 MANAGEMENT (REM) IJ TRAINING IJ 1 9 3 0 MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION * 5 49 95 CLUSTER NOT GROUPED 11 13 8 5 * Indicates less than 1% 18

Career Ladder Progression Percent Time Spent on Duties DUTIES DAFSC 2T131 (N=509) DAFSC 2T151 (N=651) DAFSC 2T171 (N=175) DAFSC 2T191 (N=19) A B C D PERFORMING DISPATCH OPERATIONS ACTIVITIES PERFORMING DISPATCH SUPPORT ACTIVITIES PERFORMING BASE PICKUP AND DELIVERY ACTIVITIES PERFORMING OPERATOR RECORDS AND LICENSING ACTIVITIES 11 59 10 3 24 32 4 5 16 10 2 3 6 1 * 1 E F PERFORMING SUPPLY AND EQUIPMENT SUPPORT ACTIVITIES PERFORMING UNIT VEHICLE CONTROL OFFICE ACTIVITIES 3 3 5 5 3 4 1 1 G H I J PERFORMING FLEET MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES PERFORMING FIELD OR EMERGENCY ACTION ACTIVITIES PERFORMING CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION ACTIVITIES PERFORMING GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL ORDER (TO) SYSTEM ACTIVITIES 1 4 * * 4 2 * 1 9 1 1 4 3 * 1 7 K PERFORMING MOBILITY AND CONTINGENCY ACTIVITIES 2 3 5 8 L PERFORMING TRAINING ACTIVITIES 2 7 7 M PERFORMING MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISORY ACTIVITIES 1 6 36 *Indicates less than 1% *Note: Columns may not add up to 100% due to rounding 6 64 19

First-Enlistment Clusters and Jobs OTHER (4%) (N=484) *Other includes: - REGISTERED EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT (REM) IJ (<1%) - FLEET MANAGEMENT IJ (1%) - LICENSING AND RECORDS IJ (1%) - SUPPLY AND EQUIPMENT SUPPORT IJ (1%) - TRAINING IJ (<1%) VEHICLE OPERATIONS CLUSTER (96%) 20

First-Enlistment Personnel Representative Tasks TASKS PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING (N=484) Clean vehicle exteriors or interiors 83 Wax vehicles 81 Transport passengers, other than DVs 80 Refuel vehicles using vehicle identification link (VIL) keys 78 Deliver or pickup unit vehicles for maintenance 78 Perform vehicle before-, during-, or after-operation inspections 77 Service vehicles, such as fluids, lubrication, and tire pressure 75 Provide DV support 74 Operate vehicles on flightlines 70 Report arrival, pickup, and release times to dispatchers 70 Verify vehicle forms, such as accident, inspection, or waiver 70 Secure wheel chocks 70 Drain air tanks 68 21

First-Enlistment Personnel Vehicles and Systems VEHICLES AND SYSTEMS PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING (N=484) Vehicles Buses, 29-45 Passenger Conventional 90 Forklifts, 10K 90 Buses, 10-28 Passenger Conventional 79 Forklifts, 6K 73 TRAILERS 40 Flatbed Trailer 60 25 Flatbed Trailer 52 Van Trailer 43 32 Stake & Platform, like Kentucky 30 Systems OLVIMS Dispatch Module 51 Standard Asset Tracking System (SATS) 19 AF Equipment Management System (AFEMS) 6 22

Specialty Training Standard (STS) Analysis STS is generally supported by survey data Some STS items may need proficiency code review Four uncoded STS items matched to JI tasks performed by more than 20% of members Four performance coded STS items out of 24 were not supported Eight technical tasks performed by 20% or more of members were not referenced to STS These should be reviewed for possible inclusion in STS 23

Proficiency Codes Requiring Review PROF CODE PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING 1st ENL (N=484) 3- LVL (N=509) TNG EMP* TSK DIF** UNIT STS ELEMENT 3.10.1 Computer Fundamentals (3.10 Use Computers) Task A0049 Verify accuracy of OLVIMS data 1a 10 12 2.79 5.34 7 3.14 Ensure adequate inspection of vehicles released from the vehicle maintenance facility -- Tasks B0062. Deliver or pickup unit vehicles for maintenance B0069. Inspect vehicles released from maintenance facilities 3.15 Promote Customer Service/Relations 1a Task M0349 Receive, process, or investigate customer complaints ATI*** 78 75 3.79 2.67 8 65 63 5.16 2.96 13 2 2.95 5.19 2 *Mean TE Rating is 2.60, Standard Deviation is 1.93 (HIGH TE= 4.53) **Mean TD Rating is 5.00, Standard Deviation is 1.00 (HIGH TD= 6.00) ***ATI=Automated Training Indicator is a training decision value for resident training (18=high; 1=low) 24

Tasks not Referenced to STS Examples PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING TNG 1ST ENL 3- LVL TSK TASK EMP* (N=484) (N=509) DIF** ATI*** B0090 Secure wheel chocks 4.53 70 66 2.78 13 E0139 Maintain base vehicle washracks 4.32 32 33 4.35 15 *Mean TE Rating is 2.60, Standard Deviation is 1.93 (HIGH TE= 4.53) **Mean TD Rating is 5.00, Standard Deviation is 1.00 (HIGH TD= 6.00) ***ATI=Automated Training Indicator is a training decision value for resident training (18=high; 1=low) 25

Job Satisfaction Indicators (Across Specialty Jobs) VEHICLE OPERATIONS CLUSTER (N=1,240) JOB INTERESTING 76 Entry-Level Vehicle Operations Job (N=115) Vehicle Operations Job (N=665) 61 75 NCOIC, Dispatch Support Job (N=118) 86 TALENTS WELL UTILIZED 69 50 68 84 TRAINING WELL UTILIZED 86 78 89 91 SENSE OF ACCOMPLISHMENT 53 40 52 72 PLAN TO REENLIST 66 54 63 80 26

Job Satisfaction Indicators (Across Specialty Jobs) (Cont.) VEHICLE OPERATIONS CLUSTER (Cont.) (N=1,240) JOB INTERESTING 76 Vehicle Control Job (N=10) Pickup and Delivery Job (N=43) 80 72 Dispatch Operations Job (N=241) 77 TALENTS WELL UTILIZED TRAINING WELL UTILIZED SENSE OF ACCOMPLISHMENT 69 86 53 PLAN TO REENLIST 66 60 70 40 70 58 65 40 60 74 87 57 76 27

Job Satisfaction Indicators (Across Specialty Jobs) (Cont.) SUPPLY & EQUIPMENT IJ (N=36) LICENSING & RECORDS IJ (N=26) FLEET MGT IJ (N=11) JOB INTERESTING 61 58 91 REM IJ (N=41) TRAINING IJ (N=71) 98 85 TALENTS WELL UTILIZED 56 46 91 93 79 TRAINING WELL UTILIZED 78 58 91 88 90 SENSE OF ACCOMPLISHMENT 50 35 82 76 68 PLAN TO REENLIST 78 69 82 83 77 28

Job Satisfaction Indicators (Across Specialty Jobs) (Cont.) MANAGEMENT & SUPERVISION CLUSTER (N=141) MANAGEMENT & SUPERVISION JOB (N=76) NCOIC, VEHICLE OPERATIONS JOB (N=22) JOB INTERESTING 88 92 82 TALENTS WELL UTILIZED 81 87 78 TRAINING WELL UTILIZED 83 87 78 SENSE OF ACCOMPLISHMENT 72 80 68 PLAN TO REENLIST 65 63 50 29

Job Satisfaction Indicators (Across AD, ANG, AFRC) AD (N=1,354) ANG (N=249) AFRC (N=97) JOB INTERESTING 46 63 63 TALENTS WELL UTILIZED 69 79 74 TRAINING WELL UTILIZED 85 86 83 SENSE OF ACCOMPLISHMENT 53 68 55 30

Job Satisfaction Indicators (Current vs. Previous Study) 1-48 MONTHS 49-96 MONTHS 97+ MONTHS 2004 (N=484) 1999 (N=533) 2004 (N=289) 1999 (N=409) 2004 (N=581) 1999 (N=452) JOB INTERESTING 69 67 67 74 83 88 TALENTS WELL UTILIZED 62 53 62 59 78 83 TRAINING WELL UTILIZED 85 82 84 78 85 75 SENSE OF ACCOMPLISHMENT 44 41 43 51 64 71 PLAN TO REENLIST 52 50 68 61 77 70 31

Retention Dimensions First-Term Airmen (N=484) PLANNING TO REENLIST (N=250) PERCENT RESPONDING AVERAGE Medical or dental care for AD member 73 2.65 Pay and allowances 67 2.49 Retirement benefits 64 2.65 Job security 63 2.65 Military-related education & training opportunities 60 2.53 PLANNING TO SEPARATE (N=230) Military lifestyle 58 2.51 Pay and allowances 41 2.25 Work schedule 37 2.43 Location of present assignment 33 2.49 Civilian job opportunities 32 2.51 Scale: 1 = slight influence, 2 = moderate influence, 3 = strong influence 32

Retention Dimensions Second-Term Airmen (N=289) PLANNING TO REENLIST (N=197) PERCENT RESPONDING AVERAGE Job security 71 2.61 Pay and allowances 70 2.51 Retirement benefits 67 2.67 Medical/dental care for AD member 61 2.67 Medical/dental care for family members 55 2.68 PLANNING TO SEPARATE (N=86) Military lifestyle 63 2.37 Pay and allowances 45 2.44 Number/duration of TDYs or deployments 42 2.78 Leadership at unit level 41 2.69 Esprit de corps/morale 40 2.56 Scale: 1 = slight influence, 2 = moderate influence, 3 = strong influence 33

Retention Dimensions Career Airmen (N=581) PLANNING TO REENLIST (N=450) PERCENT RESPONDING AVERAGE Retirement benefits 74 2.71 Pay and allowances 61 2.45 Job security 59 2.60 Medical/dental care for family members 53 2.56 Medical/dental care for AD members 52 2.57 PLANNING TO SEPARATE (N=50) Number/duration of TDYs or deployments 48 2.58 Leadership at unit level 44 2.64 Military lifestyle 44 2.41 Pay and allowances 42 2.67 Esprit de corps/morale 42 2.52 Scale: 1 = slight influence, 2 = moderate influence, 3 = strong influence 34

Summary of Results Homogeneous career field Career ladder progression typical Technical at 3-skill level Career ladder documents supported by survey data STS provided comprehensive coverage of work performed by career ladder Review of some items warranted Job satisfaction indicators are generally positive Higher ratings in all job satisfaction indicators for first-term airmen in current study when compared to previous study Lower ratings for current study second-term and career airmen in sense of accomplishment from job when compared to previous study 35

Way Ahead OSR Delivery Trip - scheduled for June 2004 Utilization and Training Workshop (U&TW) scheduled for Sept/Oct 04 at Fort Leonard Wood Next SKT rewrite (major) - scheduled for Aug 04 36

Questions? Visit our web site at: https://www-r.omsq.af.mil/oa/oaproducts.htm E-Mail: adriana.rodriguez2@randolph.af.mil 37

Sustaining the Combat Capability of America s Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e