~~D1~vvatldns Chairman, LSAB. Department 0 Business & Economic Development. December 13, 2012

Similar documents
Maryland Technology Enterprise Institute

Maryland Technology Enterprise Institute

GREATER WASHINGTON PARTNERSHIP ANNOUNCES NEW MILESTONE IN REGIONAL COLLABORATION

THE TEXAS POLICY VOICE FOR HEALTHCARE AND BIOSCIENCE SINCE 1996

Innovation in Tech Transfer S&T Stakeholders Conference- Washington DC May 21, 2007

Massachusetts Programs & Initiatives Advancing the Biopharmaceutical Industry

SHASTA EDC BUSINESS PLAN

2018 Support Prospectus

Wet Lab Market and Technical Feasibility Study. for the. Technical Innovation Center at. Hagerstown Community College. Conducted by. SPI USA, Inc.

North Carolina Biotechnology Center. Overview and Impact February 19, 2013

ANNUAL REPORT

Debi Durham Director Iowa Economic Development Authority

Ohio Third Frontier Program

Report Responding to Requirements of Legislation: Student and Employer Connection Information System

Metrics Goal Actual Goal Actual Goal Actual Goal

Baker-Polito Administration Awards $3 Million to the Gloucester Marine Genomics Institute and North Shore Schools

Baker-Polito Administration Celebrates $2 Million in Workforce and STEM Grants to Educational Institutions in Greater Boston

Estimating the Economic Contributions of the Utah Science Technology and Research Initiative (USTAR) to the Utah Economy

GREATER PHOENIX ECONOMIC SNAPSHOT Chris Camacho, President & CEO

Department of Business & Economic Development. January 24,2012

The JHU Innovation Ecosystem: A Living Listing of Resources and Connections UNIVERSITY OFFICES Johns Hopkins Technology Ventures

BEST PLACE FOR BUSINESS & CAREERS 1. 1st BEST PLACE TO DO BUSINESS 5

2017 ANNUAL REPORT TAKING BUSINESS TO THE NEXT LEVEL

The Role of the Research Enterprise in Economic Development

October 22, MTC Overview

BOTHELL BIOMEDICAL MANUFACTURING INNOVATION PARTNERSHIP ZONE

Veterans Florida Promotes Florida as a Veteran-Friendly State and Provides Numerous Services; Performance Measurement and Outreach Could Be Improved

Regional Economic Development Commissions/Partnerships

SPONSORED PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION MEETING March 2017 WELCOME

Life Sciences Tax Incentive Program

Equity-Free Investments: Annual ~$2.5B Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer Programs

Update on HB2 Preparation. Presentation to FAMPO May, 2016

VIRGINIA-ISRAEL BIOSCIENCES COMMERCIALIZATION CENTER

Guidelines for the Major Eligible Employer Grant Program

South Lake Union Innovation Partnership Zone Strategic Plan

Programs & Initiatives Advancing the Biopharmaceutical Industry

Economic Development and Job Creation Programs in Minnesota

New Brunswick Information & Communications Technology Sector Strategy

Programs & Initiatives Advancing the Biopharmaceutical Industry

SOCIAL BUSINESS FUND. Request for Proposals

Business Plan Diversity & Inclusion Forum

Case: Building on Economic Assets in Akron, Ohio after the Decline of the Tire Industry 1

Massachusetts Next Generation Initiative (MassNextGen) Solicitation Fiscal Year 2018

You re in the right place We grow biobusiness in Saskatchewan

Guidelines for the Virginia Investment Partnership Grant Program

THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON, D. C

PROSPER OMAHA REPORT. Leveraging Extraordinary Opportunities for the Region

University System of Maryland Economic Development and Technology Commercialization

STATE OF MARYLAND DHMH Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene

Best Practices in Local Public MWBE and SBE Programs. Webinar May 29, 2014

Case for Support Lee County Economic Development Group. Lee County A Five-Year Strategic Initiative to Spur Economic Growth in Lee County

2018 Corporate Partnerships

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

We are writing this letter to emphasize to you the critical importance of addressing the following issues raised in the sunset oversight hearing:

Life Sciences Outlook

2013 Nonprofits by the Numbers

Agenda Item 4 USM Office of Economic Development Updates:

The Global Health Sector s Contributions to the Economy of North Carolina

Overview of Phase 1 and 2

Palm Beach County Life Science Industry Action Plan

ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT IN JAPAN JETRO TOKYO SEMINAR MARCH 2018

Plan of Action July 1 - December 31, 2016

The Economic Impacts of the New Economy Initiative in Southeast Michigan

CEDAR VALLEY OF IOWA INVEST IN. Our motto is One Vision One Mission One Voice.

Economic Trends and Florida s Competitive Position

Nevada Governor s Office of Economic Development Nevada Local Emerging Small Business Program Report December 1, 2017

The Strategic Plan will focus on the following key initiatives:

Testimony to the Senate Majority Policy Committee and the Senate Democratic Policy Committee Joint Informational Meeting Monday, April 11, 2016


Senate File Enrolled

Mississippi State University

Budget. Stronger Services and Supports. Government Business Plan

From Crisis to Start-Up City

The University at Albany NYSUNY 2020 Challenge Grant Proposal SEPTEMBER 2012 THE EMERGING TECHNOLOGY AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP COMPLEX

NREL Presentation. Green Talent and Economic Development June 23, 2009

MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS CENTER & TEXTILE TECHNOLOGY CENTER:

September 16 th, Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm Rockville, MD 20852

energy industry chain) CE3 is housed at the

GREATER AKRON. bigger. bolder. better Chuck Jones, President, Firstenergy, Chairman of the Board, The Greater Akron Chamber

R E Q U E S T F O R A P P L I C A T I O N S

INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP MEASUREMENT SYSTEM

Economic Value of the Advertising-Supported Internet Ecosystem

CHAPTER Council Substitute for Council Substitute for House Bill No. 83

state of the sector HEALTH SCIENCES 2017

Blueprint for a Coordinated Ontario Life Sciences Strategy

PARTNERSHIP FOR DEFENSE INNOVATION Defense Security Technology Accelerator (DSTA) Program

BUsiness Horizon Quarterly

Your Austin. Your Chamber. Why I'm a Member

USTAR TECHNOLOGY ENTREPREUNERSHIP SERVICES. Ivy Estabrooke, PhD Executive Director

Strategic Business Plan

Transforming Greater Gainesville

Implementing the Oregon Food and Beverage Industry Roadmap

Center for Innovative Technology. VEDP Briefing

Cen-Tex African American Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Service Plan

RURAL HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE

Innovation and Science

Table of Contents. Letter to the Honourable H. Frank Lewis... Letter to the Honourable Patrick W. Murphy... Introduction... 1

Submission to the R&D tax environment review

Universities and EDOs

Terms of Reference (ToR) Jordan Innovative Startups and SMEs Fund (ISSF Company) Manager

Transcription:

Department 0 Business & Economic Development Martin O'Malley Governor Anthony G. Brown Lt. Governor Christian S. Johansson Secretary Dominick E. Murray Deputy Secretary December 13, 2012 The Honorable Thomas V. Mike Miller, Jr. President, Maryland Senate State House, H-107 Annapolis, Maryland 21401-1991 The Honorable Michael E. Busch Speaker, Maryland House of Delegates State House, H-101 Annapolis, Maryland 21401-1991 RE: Maryland Life Sciences Advisory Board Report Dear President Miller and Speaker Busch: In accordance with Chapter 304, Acts of 2007, the Maryland Life Sciences Advisory Board, in conjunction with the Department of Business and Economic Development is pleased to submit the annual Maryland Life Sciences Advisory Board Report. We look forward to your review of this report and will be happy to furnish any additional information that is needed. If we can be of further assistance, or if you have any questions regarding this report, please contact Dr. Judith Britz, Executive Staff to the Maryland Life Science Advisory Board at 410-767-3619. Sincerely, ~~D1~vvatldns Chairman, LSAB Christian S. Johansson Secretary, DBED. Enclosure Office of the Secretary World Trade Center 401 East Pratt Street Baltimore. Maryland 21202 410-767-6300 www.choosemaryland.org

MARYLAND LIFE SCIENCES ADVISORY BOARD ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Fiscal Year 2012 Economic Development Article, Section 3-205 Submitted by the Maryland Department of Business and Economic Development December 2012

Table of Contents Introduction 2 LSAB Background 2 Summary of FY 2012 Activities 2 Increasing Access to Capital 3 Ensuring Industry Growth and Competitiveness 4 Advancing Global BioMaryland Branding 4 Expanding Workforce Development 5 BioMaryland 2020 Initial Implementation 6 Appendices Maryland s Life Science Jobs 7 LSAB Composition and Meetings 8 Bio 2020 Strategic Plan Funding 10 1

Introduction Pursuant to 3 205 of the Maryland Economic Development Article, The Maryland Life Science Advisory Board (LSAB) presents the following report to the Governor and, in accordance with 2 1246 of the State Government Article, to the General Assembly. The report includes any recommendations from the LSAB and a summary of the activities of the LSAB during the preceding year. Life Science Advisory Board Background Governor Martin O Malley signed into law the creation of the LSAB on May 9, 2007, to assist in maintaining the preeminence of Maryland s life sciences industry. On September 18, 2007, the Governor formally introduced the LSAB s 15 original members at a ceremony held in Annapolis. According to 3 205 of the Maryland Economic Development Article, the Life Science Advisory Board was established to assist the Department in: developing a comprehensive State strategic plan for life sciences; promoting life sciences research, development, commercialization, and manufacturing in the State; promoting collaboration and coordination among life sciences organizations in the State; promoting collaboration and coordination among research institutions of higher education in the State; developing a strategy to coordinate State and federal resources to attract private sector investment and job creation in the life sciences; developing a strategy to support federal life sciences facilities located in the State, including support for education, transportation, housing, and capital investment needs; and making recommendations to address critical needs in the life sciences, including access to venture capital and capital construction funding. The LSAB s membership includes the Secretary of the Maryland Department of Business and Economic Development (DBED), a representative designated by the Maryland Technology Development Corporation (TEDCO), and 13 members appointed by the Governor to include: three representatives from federal agencies with life science missions, five representatives from biotechnology businesses in Maryland, four representatives from institutions of higher education, and a member of the general public. The 2012 Maryland General Assembly, via chapters 498 and 499, created three additional positions for the LSAB, bringing its membership to a total of 18. A New Member Orientation Program has been created to bring the new members up to speed, once they have been officially appointed. Summary of FY 2012 Activities The LSAB s initial accomplishment was the creation of BioMaryland 2020: A Strategic Plan for the Life Sciences in Maryland. The purpose of that strategic plan was to maximize Maryland s unique life sciences research and development assets, location, and workforce, and to ensure the State s continued global leadership in the biosciences. Currently, 6.5% of the State s GDP ($17.6 billion) and 6.5% of all jobs in Maryland are related to life sciences. Maryland has over 1,700 2

establishments involved in life sciences work, the 5 th highest concentration in the United States. More than 160,000 jobs in the State are directly and indirectly related to life sciences, generating $9.6 billion in salaries and providing $500 million in income and sales tax support annually to the State. This sector directly employs 71,600 persons at an average salary of $91,100/year (see Appendix A). More than one-third of all of Maryland s job gains during 2002-2010 were in the life sciences sector. For the past year, the LSAB has actively engaged Maryland s bioscience community in a continuing dialogue about the State s life sciences accomplishments and future directions, and participated in several activities. One its most important efforts involved providing testimony on behalf of maintaining funding for the Maryland Biotechnology Investment Incentive Tax Credit (BIITC) ($8 million) and the Stem Cell Fund ($10.4 million); which would have been cut in total from the Doomsday Budget, as well as an 8% across-the-board cut to the entire State budget which included TEDCO and many university programs important to the life sciences community in Maryland. In FY 2012, the LSAB held three meetings. The first meeting was held at Glycomimetics in August 2011. Funding for BioMaryland 2020 Strategic Priorities was discussed. The second meeting, held in October 2011 at the Science and Technology Park at Johns Hopkins, focused on the Workforce and Training Priorities of the BioMaryland 2020 plan. The third meeting was held in May 2012 at the Maryland Biotechnology Center s World Trade Center Baltimore offices. At this meeting, the LSAB focused on a review of MBC s activities since its inception, as well as the accomplishments of its partners. A public information and resource website for all LSAB meeting agendas and documents may be found at www.marylandbiocenter.org. The four major areas of focus in FY 2012 were in line with the four major goals of the strategic plan: Increasing Access to Capital Ensuring Industry Growth and Competitiveness Advancing Global Leadership Role/BioMaryland Branding Expanding Workforce Development I. Increasing Access to Capital A key priority of the BioMaryland 2020 Strategic Plan is to increase access to capital. Since FY 2010, the cumulative investment in Maryland s life sciences infrastructure has totaled approximately $400 million (see Appendix B). In light of the recession, many funding initiatives have been tempered. However, the BIITC, though short of the amount proposed in BioMaryland 2020, had been increased from its initial level of $6 million to $8 million two years earlier. The Doomsday Budget shortfall was resolved in May 2012, so the $8 million funding level for this program was maintained. The Stem Cell Fund, also at risk in the Doomsday Budget, was maintained. In addition, the new InvestMaryland venture program is a strong demonstration of the State s commitment to the growth of this sector. Through this program, Maryland will partner with private venture firms to support business growth for companies which have matured beyond the startup phase. Biotechnology Investment Incentive Tax Credit Program One of the most successful programs administered by DBED is the BIITC. Now entering its seventh year, Maryland s BIITC remains the most competitive of its kind in the United States and serves as an exemplary model for angel investment incentives. This program provides income tax credits equal to 50% of an eligible investment up to $250,000 for investors in qualified seed and early stage Maryland biotechnology companies. To date, $40 million in tax credits have been awarded, benefitting more than 60 companies Statewide and generating total investment of more than $80 million in them. 3

InvestMaryland InvestMaryland is an innovative program designed to revitalize venture capital funding in Maryland. This unique fund, approved by Maryland lawmakers during the 2011 Maryland General Assembly, will be the largest venture capital investment initiative in the State s history. During the past year, DBED raised the money for this fund through auctioning discounts to insurance companies for prepaying their taxes. This was an extremely successful effort. The expected raise of $70 million was exceeded, and $84 million was actually raised. A portion of this money will fund the new Maryland Venture Fund, and the remainder will be distributed to private venture capital firms for investment in Maryland life science, clean energy and technology companies. Candidates for the new fund s director position were identified and the new director hired. The fund began operations in the fall 2012. Maryland Biotechnology Center Entrepreneurial Award Development Program The Maryland Biotechnology Center (MBC) conducted its third year of competitive awards to companies and company/university partnerships leading toward commercialization of new products and services. Ninety applications were received and seven awards were made, totaling $1.4 million. These awards, which have a maximum of $200,000, were made in two categories (see Appendix C). Translational Research awards are intended to move a company or company-university partnership to the next value inflection point. Commercialization awards aim to push a later stage product development to market entry. FY 2012 Award Recipients included: BetaCat, GrayBug, Leukosite, NexImmune, PathSensors, Sanaria, and SuperNova Diagnostics. To date, $4.5 million dollars have been disbursed to 20 companies under his program. II. Ensuring Industry Growth and Competitiveness MBC BioEntrepreneur Development Program The MBC BioEntrepreneur Development Program provides a wide variety of services to bioscience entrepreneurs to help them establish and/or grow their businesses in Maryland. These include business plan counseling and resource support, identification of capital sources, access to regulatory expertise and intellectual property advice, location assistance, and training support for employees. One of the more popular MBC resources used by bioentrepreneurs is access to industry databases (Datamonitor, Deloitte Recap, Discovery Logic s Synapse, Frost & Sullivan, MedTRACK, MedTRACK Venture Finance) to support product development and marketing efforts. During the past two years, more than 200 company visits have generated thousands of searches on the five databases at MBC s Baltimore or Rockville offices to fortify their business plans. MBC spends approximately $105,000 per year to make these databases available for companies. This annual investment is leveraged 25x. Had they been purchased directly by the companies the price for the reports downloaded would have exceeded $3.5 million dollars for just the DataMonitor reports alone. Each company visit to MBC s offices for this database research also enables MBC staff to connect directly with the bioentrepreneur and learn more about his or her company, share additional resource information, and identify other opportunities for MBC to assist with the company s business growth. Industry Advocacy In concert with the LSAB, the MBC works to educate business leaders and potential industry partners on the regulatory process, best practices for effective translational research, and other topics helpful to business growth in the life sciences sector. MBC also advocates for policies facilitating commercialization opportunities and other life sciences business development initiatives. 4

Federal Initiatives The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) plays a key role in the life sciences at all times, with regulatory practices having a determining effect on the acceptance of new drugs and devices. But this past year, it took on an even bigger role, due to the looming expiration of the FDA User Fee Agreements. These agreements fund a large amount of the FDA, enabling it to accomplish its work in a timely manner. These User Fee Agreements were set to expire in October, which would result in the loss of some 4,000 federal employees at FDA. This would have detrimental effects on the ability of life science companies in Maryland and all around the country to obtain approvals and bring new products to market. Dr. Judy Britz, Executive Director of the MBC, accompanied Senator Barbara Mikulski to meet with life science companies around Maryland. They met with over 25 companies, and heard a resounding request to reauthorize the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA). Senator Mikulski then took the lead to get this important legislation accomplished. III. Advancing Global Leadership Role/BioMaryland Branding International Outreach The BIO 2012 meeting took place in June in Boston. BioMaryland s presence featured a unique pavilion as venue for an unprecedented number of activities showcasing Maryland as a premier location for bioscience research and business growth. MBC, in partnership with fellow lead sponsors at DBED, TCM/MDBio, Montgomery County, MedImmune and HGS helped the State to secure major visibility at this conference once again. The event drew more than 16,000 industry leaders from 49 states and 65 countries, with a record 25,000 + partnering meetings. New in the pavilion this year were special press conferences and panels highlighting technologies, companies and locations from around the state. Online Marketing Last fiscal year, MBC and DBED s marketing team launched a new quarterly e-newsletter, BioPulse. This publication features CEO and company spotlights and other news about Maryland s life sciences community including announcements regarding funding, discoveries, expansion and partnership activity, awards, and special events. MBC added social media tools (i.e. Twitter and Facebook) to its web-site and launched its first blog. Archived copies of BioPulse and links to the social media tools are available on MBC s website. The website provides an important link for current information about Maryland s biocompanies and the resources and partnership opportunities available to them. It also enables these companies and resources to be showcased not only locally, but also to those outside the State who may be thinking of starting a company, moving a company, or opening a U.S. headquarters or facility in Maryland. Visits to the MBC site have more than tripled since the site launched in September 2009 to an average of more than 7,000 visitors per month. Since the site launched, it has received more than 147,000 visits from unique visitors from 152 countries. More than half of this traffic (68,000) has occurred during the last 12 months. IV. Expanding Workforce Development Although funding for the Workforce Development initiative and bioscience career development activities included in BioMaryland has been limited, MBC has looked for ways to partner with the industry using any and all available resources. In these efforts, MBC is working to re-establish the 5

Maryland Biotechnology Training Consortium. Additionally, MBC has increased efforts to provide student internships to Maryland bioscience companies. Workforce development and training is an area where Maryland excels. Programs recently developed by Training Consortium members include speed training to address surge requirements and tailored company programs. These and other programs were highlighted at the October 13, 2011 LSAB meeting. BIO Maryland 2020 - Initial Implementation In FY2012, the following programs were funded to support the life science sector. FY 2012 $3.5 million: Maryland Biotechnology Center $8 million: Biotechnology Investment Incentive Tax Credit Program $6 million: Research and Development Tax Credit Program $1.2 million: Maryland Venture Fund $12.4 million: Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund $3.3 million: TEDCO Budget (technology transfer and commercialization programs within) $1.5 million MIPS program at University of Maryland is now included in TEDCO budget $84 million Invest Maryland auction (March 2012); All Technologies/3 years Summary With the strategy set forth by the LSAB, and supported by MBC, the State is uniquely positioned to leverage its bioscience research, location and workforce assets, in a way that will continue to benefit not only Maryland residents but the global community. MBC performs vital roles as a central information portal, industry advocate, resource provider and catalyst for the development and growth of Maryland s bioscience industry. With the majority of Maryland s recent job gains housed in this sector, and the employee tax support bioscience jobs provide the State, it is clear this industry is vital to Maryland. Maryland s bioscience industry has a critical role feeding, fueling, and healing the world. MBC s ability to support the continued growth of this vibrant industry will establish Maryland s place globally to accomplish the business of BIO. 6

Appendix A Table 1: MD s 71,618 life sciences jobs are in the private sector, federal government and academic institutions Maryland Life Sciences Jobs, Wages and Salaries Group Jobs Aggregate Wages & Salaries Average Annual Salary Private Sector 33,602 $3,058,887,640 $91,034 Federal Government 29,777 $2,772,774,686 $93,118 Academic 8,240 $692,744,795 $84,074 Total 71,618 $6,524,407,122 $91,100 Source: DBED analysis on data from the Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation and Bureau of Labor Statistics. Published in Life Sciences Maryland: the Jobs Analysis & Economic Impact Report 2011 Table 2: MD s private sector life sciences jobs are found largely in research, testing and medical laboratories Maryland Private Life Sciences Jobs, Salaries and Facilities 2010 Subsector Employment Jobs Share Facilities or Establishments Average Annual Salary Agricultural Feedstock and Chemicals 256 0.8% 22 $63,780 Drugs and Pharmaceuticals 6,574 19.6% 65 $102,084 Medical Devices and Equipment 1,962 5.8% 86 $67,612 Research, Testing and Medical Laboratories 24,810 73.8% 1,579 $90,239 Total 33,602 100% 1,752 $91,034 Source: DBED analysis on data from the Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation and Bureau of Labor Statistics. Life Sciences Maryland: the Jobs Analysis & Economic Impact Report 2011 7

Appendix B 2011 Life Sciences Advisory Board Members Chair: Mr. H. Thomas Watkins, CEO, Human Genome Sciences, Inc. Standing: Appointed: Mr. Christian S. Johansson, Secretary, Maryland Department of Business and Economic Development (DBED) Mr. Rob Rosenbaum, President and Executive Director, Maryland Technology Development Corporation (TEDCO) Dr. Patrick G. O Shea, Interim Vice President for Research, University of Maryland, College Park Ms. Francesca Cook, Vice President of Policy and Government Affairs, Pharmathene, Inc. Dr. Stephen Desiderio, Director, Institute for Cell Engineering, Open position, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Mr. David Iannucci, Assistant Deputy Chief Administrative Officer, Prince George s County Government Ms. Rachel King, Chief Executive Officer, Glycomimetics, Inc. Dr. Nina Lamba, President, CCL Biomedical, Inc. Dr. Jay A. Perman, M.D., President, University of Maryland, Baltimore Dr. Hercules Pinkney, President Emeritus, Montgomery College Dr. Mark Rohrbaugh, Director, Office of Technology Transfer Mr. David W. Smith, Business Director, Lonza Walkersville, Inc. Dr. Janet Woodcock, Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration Three additional appointments (pending) 8

FY 2012 Calendar of Activities for the Life Science Advisory Board All meeting agendas, presentations, minutes, and public comments can be found on the LSAB website: www.marylandbiocenter.org August 10, 2011 October 13, 2011 May 2, 2012 Meeting of the LSAB Glycomimetics 401 Professional Drive, Suite 250 Gaithersburg, MD Meeting of the LSAB Science and Technology Park at Johns Hopkins Rangos Bldg. 855 N. Wolfe Street Baltimore, MD Meeting of the LSAB Maryland Biotechnology Center MD Department of Business & Economic Development World Trade Center Baltimore 9

Appendix C BIO 2020 Strategic Plan Funding: 2010-2012 Investments in Maryland s Life Sciences Infrastructure (000) Program 2010 2011 2012 Total Venture Capital Development Enterprise Investment Fund 0.95 0.55 1.20 2.70 InvestMaryland 0.00 0.00 11.65 11.65 MEDAAF 1.25 0.50 1.75 MIDFA 0.15 0.15 Sunny Day Fund Tax Credits Maryland Biotech Investment Incentive Tax Credit Program 6.00 8.00 8.00 22.00 R&D Tax Credit Program 6.00 6.00 6.00 18.00 Research and Development Center for Biosystems Research - UMCP 1.70 1.70 Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research (IBBR)- UMCP, UMB 6.00 6.00 Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund 12.35 10.40 12.40 35.15 MIPS Operating Budget (UMCP) 0.39 0.39 MIPS Research Grants 2.52 4.20 (*TEDCO) 6.72 Nanotechnology Initiatives 0.33 0.00 0.33 University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute 46.96 46.96 Technology Transfer and Commercialization Biotech TechStart (TEDCO) 0.09 0.09 Maryland Biotechnology Center 4.69 3.79 3.63 12.11 Tech Transfer at USM 4.50 4.50 TEDCO Funding (includes technology transfer, commercialization funds, and MIPS) 3.39 3.46 *3.27 10.12 University Technology Development Fund (TEDCO) 0.34 0.20 0.54 Miscellaneous Partnership for Workforce Quality 0.49 0.07 0.57 Project Lead the Way 0.90 0.90 Programs Subtotal 85.75 37.32 59.25 182.31 Capital Projects Cecil CC Sciences Lab 2.15 2.15 College of Notre Dame of MD New Pharmacy School 3.50 0.00 0.00 3.50 Coppin State University Science & Technology Center 9.75 6.50 16.25 East Baltimore Biotechnology Park 5.00 5.00 2.50 12.50 Forensic Medical Center @ UMD BioPark 2.85 2.85 Frederick Community College Science/ Tech Hall 0.00 0.46 4.65 5.11 Greater Washington Life Sciences Fund 6.00 6.00 Howard CC Health Sciences Building 2.00 9.47 9.47 20.94 Howard CC Science, Engineering, and Technology Building 0.00 0.00 2.97 2.97 Montgomery College Rockville Science Center 1.01 4.24 6.21 11.46 Montgomery College/ Germantown Bioscience Education Center 16.10 16.10 0.00 32.20 Prince George's Community College Center for Health Studies 18.06 6.51 24.57 UMB Health Sciences Research Facility 0.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 UMB School of Pharmacy 13.70 2.61 0.00 16.31 UMBC Center of Marine Biology 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 UMCP Physical Sciences Complex 4.62 41.10 30.10 75.82 University Capital Projects Subtotal 68.74 85.49 62.24 216.46 All Capital Projects Subtotal 82.58 91.99 62.24 236.81 Totals 168.33 129.30 121.49 419.12 10