Occupational Survey Report AFSC 4H0X1 Cardiopulmonary Laboratory

Similar documents
Air Education and Training Command

Occupational Survey Report AFSC 4A1X1 Medical Materiel

Air Education and Training Command

Air Education and Training Command

Occupational Survey Report AFSC 1C0X1 Airfield Management

Occupational Survey Report AFSC 1T0X1 Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape Operations

Air Education and Training Command

Occupational Survey Report AFSC 4A0X1 Health Services Management

Air Education and Training Command

Air Education and Training Command

U&TW Briefing. Air Education and Training Command. Manpower AFSC 3U0X1, 38MX & Management and Program Analysis OS 343

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Air Education and Training Command

USAF TECHNICAL TRAINING NAS Pensacola Florida Develop America's Airmen Today --- for Tomorrow

Wildland Fire Assistance

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Air Education and Training Command

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

USAF Hearing Conservation Program, DOEHRS Data Repository Annual Report: CY2012

AFRL-ML-WP-TP

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Choose to Lose. Tammy Lindberg, Lt Col, USAF, BSC

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Military Health System Conference. Public Health Service (PHS) Commissioned Corps

A system overview of the Electronic Surveillance System for the Early Notification of Community-based Epidemics

Development of a Hover Test Bed at the National Hover Test Facility

AMCOM Corrosion Program

AFRL-VA-WP-TP

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

SIMULATOR SYSTEMS GROUP

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Potential Savings from Substituting Civilians for Military Personnel (Presentation)

Conservation Law Enforcement Program Standardization

MCAS BEAUFORT SUSTAINABLE RANGES BRIEF MCAS BEAUFORT COMMUNITY PLANS AND LIAISON OFFICE (CP&L)

Report No. DODIG Department of Defense AUGUST 26, 2013

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

Mission Task Analysis for the NATO Defence Requirements Review

Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) Patient Care Platform: Expanding Global Applications and Impact

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Improving Safety of Demil Operations Through Automation. Mark M. Zaugg July 14, 2010

The Use of Sikes Act Cooperative Agreements for Implementing INRMP Projects

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Presented to: Presented by: February 5, Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

OCCUPATIONAL SURVEY REPORT

United States Air Force 423 SCMS Hydraulic Actuator Chrome Replacement

Information Technology

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Financial Management

OCCUPATIONAL SURVEY REPORT

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound


Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Staffing Cyber Operations (Presentation)

Joint Basing and Explosives Safety from the US Navy Perspective

Google Pilot / WEdge Viewer

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

Report Documentation Page

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

Report No. D July 25, Guam Medical Plans Do Not Ensure Active Duty Family Members Will Have Adequate Access To Dental Care

RESPONDING TO COMPOSITE FIRES: FIRST RESPONDER TRAINING MODULE

Transcription:

Sustaining the Combat Capability of America s Air Force Occupational Survey Report AFSC Cardiopulmonary Laboratory Lt Laura McDonald Feb 04 I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 00 FEB 2004 2. REPORT TYPE N/A 3. DATES COVERED - 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Occupational Survey Report AFSC Cardiopulmonary Laboratory 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) AFOMS/OA 1550 Fifth Street East Randolph AFB, TX 78150 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADM001659., The original document contains color images. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UU a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 35 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

AFOMS/OA 1550 Fifth Street East Randolph AFB, TX 78150 DSN 487 6811 https://www-r.omsq.af.mil/oa/oaproducts.htm I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Survey background Survey results Implications 3

Fairly homogeneous job structure with some variations within the one cluster and one independent job identified Technical tasks are performed throughout all skill levels STS generally supported by survey data Job satisfaction indicators comparable to previous study 4

Performs and manages cardiopulmonary laboratory activities for: Non-invasive diagnostic cardiac procedures Invasive diagnostic and interventional cardiac procedures Pulmonary function testing Diagnostic and therapeutic bronchoscopies Respiratory therapy 5

AFSC-awarding courses Cardiopulmonary Laboratory Apprentice (Phase 1) J3AQR4H031-003 882 TRS, Sheppard AFB TX 12 weeks, 1 day 30 semester hours for CCAF Cardiopulmonary Laboratory Apprentice (Phase 2) J5ABO4H031-001 Andrews AFB, Keesler AFB, Lackland AFB, Travis AFB, or Wright-Patterson AFB 12 weeks, 1 day 45 semester hours for CCAF 6

Programmed Programmed TPR Elimination Rate FY04: 53 students FY04: 6% (Phase 1) 2% (Phase 2) FY05: 52 students FY05: 5% (Phase 1) 2% (Phase 2) 7

Last Occupational Survey Report (OSR): May 00 Current survey developed: Aug Nov 02 Sheppard AFB TX (Tech School) Travis AFB CA Lackland AFB TX Nellis AFB NV CARDIOPULMONARY LABORATORY EQUIPMENT FEBRUARY 2004 (Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited) 8

Survey initiated to obtain data to: Evaluate current classification and training documents Support promotion test development Current survey data collected: Feb - Jun 03 Components surveyed: Active Duty: 3-, 5-, 7-, 9-Skill Levels and CEMs CARDIOPULMONARY LABORATORY EQUIPMENT FEBRUARY 2004 (Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited) 9

AD Assigned* 231 Mailed Out 208 Sample 109 Usable Returns 52% Average time in career field for AD: 9 years 4 months Average TAFMS for AD: 11 years 2 months Percent of AD in first enlistment: 15% * Assigned as of Oct 02 10

Assigned* Sample E-1 - E-3-15% 10% E-4-11% 13% E-5-34% 39% E-6-21% 17% E-7-15% 17% E-8-2% 2% E-9-2% 3% * Assigned as of Oct 02 Note: Columns may not add up to 100% due to rounding 11

Command AETC AMC AFMC ACC USAFE USAFA PACAF OTHER** Assigned %** 35 26 17 9 5 3 3 2 Sample % 24 37 15 13 5 4 4 0 * Assigned as of Oct 02 Note: Columns may not add up to 100% due to rounding 12

(N = 109) SUPERVISION AND TRAINING IJ (11%) NOT GROUPED (2%) CARDIOPULMONARY CLUSTER (87%) 13

Administer medications Collect blood gas samples Inspect cardiopulmonary equipment Take and record vital signs Monitor echocardiographic (ECG) recordings Review medical records of patients Perform routine ventilator checks Respiratory Therapy Job Pulmonary Laboratory Job NCOIC Job 87% Non-Invasive Cardiology Job 14

Establish performance standards for subordinates Evaluate personnel for compliance with performance standards Counsel subordinates concerning personal matters Conduct supervisory performance feedback sessions Maintain training records or files Determine training requirements Inspect personnel for compliance with military standards Schedule work assignments or priorities 11% 15

3-skill-level personnel Spend most all of their time on the technical tasks in the career field 5- and 7-skill-level personnel Continue to perform technical tasks However, take on supervisory, training, and administrative duties 9-skill-level personnel and CEM Not reported: N< 5 surveys returned 16

DAFSC DAFSC DAFSC 4H031 4H051 4H071 SPECIALTY JOBS (N=15) (N=59) (N=31) CARDIOPULMONARY LABORATORY CLUSTER 100 97 71 Respiratory Therapy Job 60 34 16 Pulmonary Laboratory Job 20 17 7 NCOIC Job 0 25 39 Non-Invasive Cardiology Job 13 17 3 Not Grouped 7 4 0 SUPERVISION AND TRAINING IJ 0 2 26 Note: Columns may not add up to 100% due to rounding 17

DAFSC DAFSC DAFSC 4H031 4H051 4H071 DUTIES (N=15) (N=59) (N=31) A PERFORMING COMMON RESPIRATORY THERAPY, 40 31 17 PULMONARY, CARDIOVASCULAR, OR POLYSOMNOGRAM ACTIVITIES B PERFORMING INVASIVE CARDIOVASCULAR ACTIVITIES * 2 4 C PERFORMING NON-INVASIVE CARDIOVASCULAR 12 17 7 ACTIVITIES D PERFORMING PULMONARY LABORATORY ACTIVITIES 7 7 6 E PERFORMING RESPIRATORY THERAPY ACTIVITIES 34 20 11 F PERFORMING POLYSOMNOGRAM ACTIVITIES * * * G PERFORMING ADMINISTRATIVE OR SUPPLY ACTIVITIES 4 6 7 H PERFORMING MEDICAL READINESS ACTIVITIES * 3 4 I PERFORMING TRAINING ACTIVITIES 2 3 16 J PERFORMING MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISORY ACTIVITIES 1 9 28 * Indicates less than 1% Note: Columns may not add up to 100% due to rounding 18

(N = 16) SUPERVISION AND TRAINING IJ (11%) NOT GROUPED (2%) CARDIOPULMONARY CLUSTER (87%) 19

PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING TASKS (N=16) Administer medications 88 Perform arterial punctures 81 Collect blood gas samples 81 Clean and disinfect nondisposable cardiopulmonary equipment or 75 components Set up nebulizers 75 Administer and monitor bronchodilator therapies 75 Perform pulse oximeter tests 75 Perform peak flows 75 Take and record vital signs 69 Instruct patients in use of handheld or updraft nebulizers 69 Perform routine ventilator checks 69 Instruct patients in use of metered dose inhalers (MDIs) 69 Set up and administer delivery devices for administering oxygen 69 Perform pre- or post-treatment evaluations of respiratory 69 therapy patients Perform blood gas analyses 69 20

PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING EQUIPMENT & SYSTEMS (N=16) Flow Meters 81 Metered-Dose Inhalers (MDIs) 81 Stethoscopes 81 Nebulizers, Small Volume (SVNs) or Handheld (HHNs) 75 Oximeters, Pulse 75 Suction Machines 75 Cuff Manometers 69 Resuscitation Bags 69 Catheters, Suction 63 Composite Health Care Systems (CHCS) 63 Devices, Oxygen (O2) Humidification (Bubble) 63 Electrocardiographic Machines 63 Incentive Spirometer 63 Devices, Humidification 56 Oxygen Blenders 56 Percussors 56 21

PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING EQUIPMENT & SYSTEMS (N=16) Devices, Humidification 56 Oxygen Blenders 56 Percussors 56 Defibrillators 50 Holter Monitor Equipment 50 Monitors, Ventilator Mechanics 50 Ventilators, Volume 50 22

STS was generally supported by survey data However, several STS elements were unsupported Some STS items may need proficiency code review Three uncoded STS elements matched to JI tasks performed by more than 20% of members Several technical tasks performed by 20% or more of members were not referenced to STS These should be reviewed for possible inclusion in STS 23

Examples UNIT STS ELEMENT PROF CODE PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING 1ST ENL (N=16) 3- LVL (N=15) TNG EMP* TSK DIF** ATI*** 1f(4)(c). Caustic and corrosive chemicals (1(f)4. Plan safety or security programs) b Task J0363. Plan safety or security programs 0 0 1.32 5.23 **** 7(a)11. Drug or physiologically induced asthma study (7a. Assist physician in a performing) Tasks D0140. Perform drug-induced asthma tests 13 13 5.37 5.26 11 D0142. Perform exercise-induced asthma tests 6 7 5.21 5.34 11 7b(5). Operate D.C. defibrillators (7b. Assist physician in cardiopulmonary 2b emergency procedures) Tasks A0049. Perform user maintenance on defibrillators 13 7 4.53 4.32 7 B0080. Perform cardiac defibrillation 6 7 2.95 5.54 2 9i(5). Fiberoptic bronchoscope (9i. Perform user maintenance on) 2b Tasks D0152. Perform user maintenance on fiber-optic bronchoscopes 6 0 4.42 5.56 7 F0230. Perform user maintenance on polysomnograph equipment 0 0 1.26 5.96 **** * Mean TE Rating = 3.18; Standard Deviation = 1.92; High TE = 5.10 ** Mean TD Rating = 5.00; Standard Deviation = 1.00; High TD = 6.00 *** ATI = Automated Training Indicator is training decision value for resident training (18 = high; 1 = low) 24

UNIT STS ELEMENT PROF CODE PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING 1ST ENL (N=16) 3- LVL (N=15) TNG EMP* TSK DIF** ATI*** 10t(5). Transport mechanically ventilated patients (internal or - external) (10t.)Team functions during long/shortterm ventilation Tasks A0060. Transport or monitor patients within facility 63 60 5.26 3.94 13 E0222. Transport and monitor mechanically 25 27 6.53 5.84 11 ventilated patients to another facility E0223. Transport and monitor mechanically ventilated patients within facility 63 67 6.68 5.18 18 * Mean TE Rating is 3.18, Standard Deviation is 1.92 (HIGH TE= 5.10) ** Mean TD Rating is 5.00, Standard Deviation is 1.00 (HIGH TD= 6.00) ***ATI=Automated Training Indicator is a training decision value for resident training (18=high; 1=low) 25

PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING TNG 1ST ENL 3- LVL TSK TASK EMP* (N=16) (N=15) DIF** ATI*** A0004 Assemble or disassemble cardiopulmonary 5.21 50 53 4.94 18 equipment components A0015 Clean patient treatment or examination 2.79 38 33 1.29 4 rooms A0023 Inspect cardiopulmonary equipment 4.63 63 60 3.90 8 A0040 Perform code cart checks 3.63 63 67 2.91 8 E0180 Maintain open airways 6.74 56 60 5.36 18 E0183 Perform bedside spirometry 5.16 31 33 4.54 12 * Mean TE Rating is 3.18, Standard Deviation is 1.92 (HIGH TE= 5.10) ** Mean TD Rating is 5.00, Standard Deviation is 1.00 (HIGH TD= 6.00) ***ATI=Automated Training Indicator is a training decision value for resident training (18=high; 1=low) 26

Job Satisfaction Indicators (Across Specialty Jobs) CARDIO- PULMONARY CLUSTER (N=95) Respiratory Therapy Job (N=35) Pulmonary Laboratory Job (N=15) NCOIC Job (N=28) Non- Invasive Cardiology Job (N=13) JOB INTERESTING 83 86 73 93 62 TALENTS WELL UTILIZED 90 94 80 96 77 TRAINING WELL UTILIZED 90 94 80 93 84 SENSE OF ACCOMPLISHMENT 74 77 67 79 54 PLAN TO REENLIST 56 51 67 61 54 27

Job Satisfaction Indicators (Across Specialty Jobs) JOB INTERESTING SUPERVISON & TRAINING IJ (N=12) 100 TALENTS WELL UTILIZED 100 TRAINING WELL UTILIZED 92 SENSE OF ACCOMPLISHMENT 83 PLAN TO REENLIST 50 28

Job Satisfaction Indicators (Current vs. Previous Study) 1-48 Months 49-96 Months 97+ Months 2004 (N=16) 2000 (N=57) 2004 (N=32) 2000 (N=48) 2004 (N=61) 2000 (N=98) JOB INTERESTING 75 88 84 81 89 80 TALENTS WELL UTILIZED 81 82 94 85 94 81 TRAINING WELL UTILIZED 88 88 94 83 90 79 SENSE OF ACCOMPLISHMENT 69 70 72 75 79 70 PLAN TO REENLIST 44 49 59 44 56 65 29

PLANNING TO REENLIST (N=7) Military-related education or training opportunities Medical or dental care for AD member Pay and allowances Job security Military lifestyle PERCENT RESPONDING 100 71 71 57 57 AVERAGE 2.43 2.80 2.00 2.75 1.75 PLANNING TO SEPARATE (N=9) Military lifestyle 67 Pay and allowances 67 Unit manning 56 Recognition of efforts 44 Civilian job opportunities 44 Scale: 1 = slight influence, 2 = moderate influence, 3 = strong influence 2.00 1.67 2.40 2.50 2.25 30

PLANNING TO REENLIST (N=19) Military-related education or training opportunities Medical or dental care for AD member Job security Medical or dental care for family members Retirement benefits PERCENT RESPONDING 68 63 47 47 47 AVERAGE 2.00 2.42 2.78 2.56 2.33 PLANNING TO SEPARATE (N=13) Unit manning Recognition of efforts Civilian job opportunities Bonus or special pay Off-duty education or training opportunities 54 46 46 46 38 2.43 2.83 2.67 1.83 3.00 Scale: 1 = slight influence, 2 = moderate influence, 3 = strong influence 31

PLANNING TO REENLIST (N=34) Retirement benefits Job security Medical or dental care for family members Pay and allowances Military lifestyle PERCENT RESPONDING 76 71 68 68 59 AVERAGE 2.85 2.79 2.87 2.52 2.45 PLANNING TO SEPARATE (N=7) Recognition of efforts Unit manning Military lifestyle Pay and allowances Civilian job opportunities 71 57 57 57 43 2.40 2.75 2.50 2.50 3.00 Scale: 1 = slight influence, 2 = moderate influence, 3 = strong influence 32

Homogeneous career ladder Career ladder progression typical Highly technical at 3-skill level progressing to more managerial at 7-skill level STS provides coverage of work performed by career ladder However, review of some items warranted Job satisfaction indicators Comparable job satisfaction ratings when compared to the previous study conducted in 2000 Lowest job satisfaction indicated by first-enlistment personnel 33

Visit our web site at: E-Mail: laura.mcdonald@randolph.af.mil 34

Sustaining the Combat Capability of America s Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e