Dianne Feeney, Associate Director of Quality Initiatives. Measurement

Similar documents
FINAL RECOMMENDATION REGARDING MODIFYING THE QUALITY- BASED REIMBURSEMENT INITIATIVE AFTER STATE FY 2010

Value-based incentive payment percentage 3

Model VBP FY2014 Worksheet Instructions and Reference Guide

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2012 DATA PUBLISHED 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Medicare Value-Based Purchasing for Hospitals: A New Era in Payment

CMS in the 21 st Century

An Overview of the. Measures. Reporting Initiative. bwinkle 11/12

IMPROVING HCAHPS, PATIENT MORTALITY AND READMISSION: MAXIMIZING REIMBURSEMENTS IN THE AGE OF HEALTHCARE REFORM

National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing

Value Based Purchasing

Objectives. Integrating Performance Improvement with Publicly Reported Quality Metrics, Value-Based Purchasing Incentives and ISO 9001/9004

HIT Incentives: Issues of Concern to Hospitals in the CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Stage 2 Rule

Our Hospital s Value Based Purchasing (VBP) Journey

Medicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program Measures (Calendar Year 2012 Discharges - Revised)

Olutoyin Abitoye, MD Attending, Department of Internal Medicine Virtua Medical Group New Jersey,USA

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (At a Glance)

State of the State: Hospital Performance in Pennsylvania October 2015

KANSAS SURGERY & RECOVERY CENTER

Medicare Payment Strategy

August 1, 2012 (202) CMS makes changes to improve quality of care during hospital inpatient stays

Value based Purchasing Legislation, Methodology, and Challenges

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

National Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Measures Specifications Manual

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

PASSPORT ecare NEXT AND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

CME Disclosure. HCAHPS- Hardwiring Your Hospital for Pay-for-Performance Success. Accreditation Statement. Designation of Credit.

Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System

Q & A with Premier: Implications for ecqms Under the CMS Update

Hospital Compare Quality Measures: 2008 National and Florida Results for Critical Access Hospitals

Quality Care Amongst Clinical Commotion: Daily Challenges in the Care Environment

Innovative Coordinated Care Delivery

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010

The dawn of hospital pay for quality has arrived. Hospitals have been reporting

An Illustration in CLAS Bringing the Cultural and Linguistic Service Standards to Life

CMS Value Based Purchasing: The Wave of the Future

New Mexico Hospital Association

WA Flex Program Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Program

National Patient Safety Goals & Quality Measures CY 2017

Clinical Guidelines and Performance Measurement

Understanding HSCRC Quality Programs and Methodology Updates

Step-by-Step Calculations for Value-Based Purchasing

FFY 2018 IPPS PROPOSED RULE CHA MEMBER FORUM

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Clinical Quality Measures Are You Ready?

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

Value Based Purchasing: Improving Healthcare Outcomes Using the Right Incentives

MBQIP Quality Measure Trends, Data Summary Report #20 November 2016

Medicare P4P -- Medicare Quality Reporting, Incentive and Penalty Programs

FY 2014 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Quality Provisions Webinar

MEDICARE BENEFICIARY QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (MBQIP)

Quality Matters. Quality & Performance Improvement

Improving Compliance

Improving quality of care during inpatient hospital stays

Is Emergency Department Quality Related to Other Hospital Quality Domains?

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

PATIENT SAFETY OVERVIEW

PATIENT SAFETY KNOWLEDGEBASE. How to prepare for a Survey

Value-Based Purchasing & Payment Reform How Will It Affect You?

Benchmark Data Sources

SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL and TRAUMA CENTER

FY 2015 Inpatient PPS Final Rule Teleconference September 16, 2014

SCORING METHODOLOGY APRIL 2014

Hospital Compare Quality Measure Results for Oregon CAHs: 2015

CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES (CMS) / PREMIER HOSPITAL QUALITY INCENTIVE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

The Data Game. Vicky A. Mahn-DiNicola RN, MS, CPHQ VP Research & Market Insights

Performance Measurement Work Group Meeting 10/18/2017

The 5 W s of the CMS Core Quality Process and Outcome Measures

Proposed Meaningful Use Incentives, Criteria and Quality Measures Affecting Critical Access Hospitals

P4P Programs 9/13/2013. Medicare P4P Programs. Medicaid P4P Programs

The Wave of the Future: Value-Based Purchasing & the Impact of Quality Reporting Within the Revenue Cycle

PATIENT SAFETY OVERVIEW

State FY2013 Hospital Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Guide

Next Generation of Healthcare in the World of ACOs and VBP

Medicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years

Strategy/Driver Prevention Strategies Action Strategies

Quality Health Indicators: Measure List. Clinical Quality: Monthly

Clinical Quality Payment Policies Impact to Finance and Operations

Person-Centered Care and Population Health

Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2012

Scoring Methodology FALL 2017

Connecting the Revenue and Reimbursement Cycles

Overview of DataGen Analyses Wyoming Hospital Association

SCIP. Surgical Care Improvement Project. Making Surgeries Safer. By: Roshini Mathew, RN

Care Coordination What Matters

Rural-Relevant Quality Measures for Critical Access Hospitals

Case Study High-Performing Health Care Organization December 2008

Scoring Methodology SPRING 2018

Aligning Hospital and Physician P4P The Q-HIP SM /QP-3 SM Model. Rome H. Walker MD February 28, 2008

Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings on Hospital Compare April 2016 Methodology and Specifications Report. January 25, 2016

Quality Health Indicators: Measure List. Clinical Quality: Monthly

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

PAY FOR PERFORMANCE AND VALUE BASED PURCHASING: Leigh Humphrey, MBA, LMSW, CPHQ

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated May 2011

The Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Project (MBQIP) Monthly Performance Improvement Call

Mastering the Mandatory Elements of the Affordable Care Act. Melinda Hancock Walter Coleman

Presented by: Gara Edelstein, CNO, CHS & St. Catherine of Siena Nicolette Fiore-Lopez, CNO, St. Charles Hospital Susan Penque, CNO, South Nassau

Facility State National

System Quality Control and. Peter Shamamian, MD FACS Vice President and Chief Quality Officer Vice Chairman for Quality and Performance Improvement

Transcription:

HSCRC Quality Based Reimbursement Program Dianne Feeney, Associate Director of Quality Initiatives Sule Calikoglu, Associate Director of Performance Measurement 1

Quality Initiative Timeline Phase I: Quality Based dpurchasing linked to payment 2008 (QBR) 19 core measures 4 clinical domains & patient experience of care Relative performance linked to rewards/penalties in annual inflation update Phase II: Maryland Hospital Acquired Conditions 2009 (MHAC) 49 Potentially Preventable Complication Categories Payment incentives linked to relative hospital performance on riskadjusted rates of complications and weighted by cost of complications 2

Quality Based Reimbursement Initiative (QBR) Work group on Pay for Performance Methodology started in 2005. QBR is implemented in FY2009 Hospital Quality Alliance (HQA)/Joint Commission/CMS Clinical Care process measures for: heart attack heart failure pneumonia surgical care improvement program Key methodological components: FY2013 Rates: CY2011 performance period, CY2010 base period Opportunity, Appropriateness (Perfect Care), HCAHPS Use of better of attainment or improvement scores Modified scoring for topped off measures Use of 0.5% of revenue at risk redistributed on a revenue neutral bases 3

Quality Based Reimbursement Initiative Modifications Measures are adjusted based on those used for the Maryland Hospital Performance Evaluation Guide maintained by the Maryland Health Care Commission Changing the weights: Appropriateness Score increased from 25% to 50% CMS Value Based Purchasing Program FY2013 HCAHPS Patient Patient Experience of Care measures 4

QBR Score CLINICAL SCORE (70%) HCAHPS (30%) Opportunity Score (50%) Performance Score (10*8) Percent of patients receiving each core measure Appropriateness Score (50%) Percent of patients in each domain receiving ALL indicated care (Perfect Care) Percent of top box answers (always) for each dimension Consistency Score (20) Measure whether hospitals aremeeting the achievement thresholds across the eight proposed HCAHPS dimensions 5

QBR MEASURES AND DOMAINS OPPORUNITY MEASURES AMI-1 Aspirin at Arrival AMI-2 Aspirin prescribed at discharge AMI-3 ACEI or ARB for LVSD AMI-5 Beta blocker prescribed at discharge AMI-8a - Primary PCI Received Within 90 Minutes of Hospital Arrival CAC-1a - Relievers for Inpatient Asthma (age 2 through 17 years) Overall Rate CAC-2a - Systemic Corticosteroids for Inpatient Asthma (age 2 through 17 years) Overall Rate CAC-3-Home Management Plan of Care (HMPC) Document Given to Patient/Caregiver HF-1 Discharge instructions HF-2 Left ventricular systolic function (LVSF) assessment HF-3 ACEI or ARB for LVSD PN-3b Blood culture before first antibiotic Pneumonia PN-6 Initial Antibiotic Selection for CAP in Immunocompetent Patient SCIP CARD 2 Surgery Patients ts on Beta-Blocker e Therapy Prior to Admission Who Received a Beta-Blocker During the Perioperative Period SCIP INF 1- Antibiotic given within 1 hour prior to surgical incision SCIP INF 2- Antibiotic selection SCIP INF 3- Antibiotic discontinuance within appropriate time period postoperatively SCIP INF 4- Cardiac Surgery Patients with Controlled 6 A.M. Postoperative Serum Glucose SCIP INF 6- Surgery Patients with Appropriate Hair Removal SCIP VTE 1- Surgery Patients with Recommended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Ordered SCIP VTE 2 - Surgery Patients t with Recommended d Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Given 24 hours prior and after surgery APPROPRIATNESS DOMAIN AMI CAC HF SCIP Clinical Process of Care Domains 70% HCAHPS DIMENSIONS HACHPS Domain 30% Cleanliness and Quiteness of Hospital Envir Communication About Medicines (Q16-Q17) Communication With Doctors (Q5-Q7) Communication With Nurses (Q1-Q3) Discharge Information (Q19-Q20) Overall Rating of this Hospital Pain Management (Q13-Q14) Responsiveness of Hospital Staff (Q4,Q11) 6

Total Score Calculation Two domains: Clinical Process of Care (22 measures and 4 domains) and Patient Experience of Care (8 HCAHPS dimensions) i Hospitals are given points for Achievement and Improvement for each measure or dimension, with the greater set of points used Points are added across all measures to reach the Clinical Process of Caredomain score Points are added across all dimensions and are added to the Consistency Points to reach the Patient Experience of Care domain score 7

Attainment and Improvement ATTAINMENT Comparing hospital s rate to the threshold and benchmark All achievement points will be rounded to the nearest whole number (for example, an achievement score of 4.5 would be rounded to 5). If a hospital s score is: Equal to or greater than the benchmark, the hospital will receive 10 points for achievement. Equal to or greater than the achievement threshold (but below the benchmark), the hospital will receive a score of 1 9 based on a linear scale established for the achievement range. IMPROVEMENT Comparing hospital s rate to the base year (the highest rate in the previous year for opportunity and HCAHPS performance scores) If a hospital s score on the measure during the performance period is: Greater than its baseline period score butbelow below the benchmark (within the improvement range), the hospital will receive a score of 0 9 based on the linear scale that defines the improvement range. 8

Attainment vs. Improvement Attainment: 9

Math Attainment Points: [9 * ((Hospital s s performanceperiodscore period Attainment threshold)/ (benchmark Attainment threshold))] +.5, where the hospital performance period score falls in the range from the Attainment threshold to the benchmark Improvement Points: [10 * ((Hospital performance period score Hospital baseline period score)/(benchmark Hospital baseline period score))].5, where the hospital performance score falls in the range from the hospital ss baseline periodscore to the Benchmark: mean value for the top 10 percent of hospitals during the baseline period (or 90% for topped off measures) Threshold: 50 th percentile (or 65% for topped off measures) 10

Better of Attainment or Improvement Points Used Attainment Threshold Benchmark All Hospitals Baseline Score One Hospital s Performance Attainment Range Attainment Threshold Benchmark One Hospital s Baseline Score Score One Hospital s Performance Attainment Range Improvement Range 11

Threshold and Benchmark Non Topped Off 12

Topped off Measure Definition Topped off measures are determined by two criteria 75% and 90% percentile arenot statistically distinguishable Truncated coefficient of variation, in which the five percent of hospitals with the lowest scores, and the five percent of hospitals with highest scores were first truncated (set aside) is less than.10 Coefficient of Variation : standard deviation/mean 13

HCAHPS Consistency Lowest tdimension i Score: ((Hospital s performance period score floor)/(attainment t threshold floor)) h Consistency Points: (20 * (lowest dimension score) 0.5), rounded to the nearest whole number, with a minimum of zero and a maximum of 20 consistency points. 14

Minimum Number of Cases Opportunity : at least 10 cases Appropriateness : at least 25 patients HCAHPS: at least 100 responses Hospitals should have a minimum of 5 measures scores for the clinical model 15

Money reallocated From here To here.. Hospital QBR Scaling (0.5% Max. Penalty aty$ $7.9 mil) QBR GROSS INPATIENT FINAL HOSPID CPC/CPE REVENUE SCORE SCALING % SCALED AMOUNT 210054 $146,082,502 0.4096-0.50% -$730,413 210044 $208,875,651 0.4099-0.50% -$1,043,091 210003 $175,673,564 0.4106-0.50% -$874,760 210012 $365,095,082 0.4338-0.45% -$1,644,016,0 6 210061 $35,569,941 0.4638-0.39% -$138,255 210040 $125,688,476 0.4873-0.34% -$427,868 210019 $235,561,632 0.5015-0.31% -$733,199...... 210002 $787,107,460 0.7597 0.21% $1,616,344 210049 $117,444,944 0.7786 0.24% $283,917 210023 $241,861,191 0.7822 0.25% $601,451 210008 $188,060,788 0.7911 0.27% $499,890 210037 $117,317,772 0.7958 0.27% $322,463 210010 $37,355,818 0.8005 0.28% $106,058 210043 $188,870,979 0.83 0.34% $643,512 210038 $119,697,303 0.8301 0.34% $408,057 210028 $54,639,193 0.905 0.49% $265,070 Poorest Performing Hospitals (high rates of complications) Best Performing Hospitals (low rates of complications) 16 16