American Public Attitudes toward North Korea s Nuclear and Missile Programs

Similar documents
Steven Pifer on the China-U.S.-Russia Triangle and Strategy on Nuclear Arms Control

Public Backs Same Goals, Different Means In Dealing With Iraq and North Korea

Chapter 17: Foreign Policy and National Defense Section 3

LAB4-W12: Nation Under Attack: Live Cyber- Exercise

Chapter 4 The Iranian Threat

Public Backs Diplomatic Approach in Syria, But Distrusts Syria and Russia

President Obama and National Security

THAAD and the Military Balance in Asia

The Iraqi Public on the US Presence and the Future of Iraq -A WorldPublicOpinion.org Poll-

GREAT DECISIONS WEEK 8 NUCLEAR SECURITY

Nukes: Who Will Have the Bomb in the Middle East? Dr. Gary Samore. WCFIA/CMES Middle East Seminar Harvard University October 4, 2018

The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going forward

INSS Insight No. 459, August 29, 2013 US Military Intervention in Syria: The Broad Strategic Purpose, Beyond Punitive Action

NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL: THE END OF HISTORY?

Statement and Recommendations of the Co-Chairs of the 3 rd Panel on Peace and Security of Northeast Asia (PSNA) Workshop

Iran Nuclear Deal: The Limits of Diplomatic Niceties

UNDOING OBAMA S DAMAGE TO AMERICA

Towards a European Non-Proliferation Strategy. May 23, 2003, Paris

Nuclear Physics 7. Current Issues

THE NUCLEAR WORLD IN THE EARLY 21 ST CENTURY

1

SS.7.C.4.3 Describe examples of how the United States has dealt with international conflicts.

DEALING WITH NORTH KOREAN PROVOCATIONS

General Assembly First Committee. Topic A: Nuclear Non-Proliferation in the Middle East

Montessori Model United Nations. Distr.: Upper Elementary Twelfth Session XX March First Committee Disarmament and International Security

Threats to Peace and Prosperity

Time is Running Out for the United States To Address the North Korean Nuclear Threat

National Defense University. Institute for National Strategic Studies

The 38 th Security Consultative Meeting Joint Communiqué

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, September 2014, Bipartisan Support for Obama s Military Campaign Against ISIS

PENTAGON SPENDING AT HISTORICALLY HIGH LEVELS FOR OVER A DECADE

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2015, A Year Later, U.S. Campaign Against ISIS Garners Support, Raises Concerns

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, October 2014, Support for U.S. Campaign Against ISIS; Doubts About Its Effectiveness, Objectives

Montessori Model United Nations. First Committee Disarmament and International Security

Montessori Model United Nations. Distr.: Middle School Twelfth Session XX March First Committee Disarmament and International Security

SUB Hamburg A/ Nuclear Armament. GREENHAVEN PRESS A part of Gale, Cengage Learning. GALE CENGAGE Learning-

SECRETARY OF DEFENSE CHUCK HAGEL SOREF SYMPOSIUM WASHINGTON INSTUTUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY WASHINGTON, DC THURSDAY, MAY 9, 2013

Foreign Policy and Homeland Security

Chapter 17: Foreign Policy and National Defense Section 1

The FY2015 US Defense Budget, the New Quadrennial Defense Review and the U.S. Commitment to the Middle East and Asia

The Obama Administration s North Korea Policy. C. Kenneth Quinones, Ph.D., Dean of Research Evaluation

Reading Essentials and Study Guide

2 Articles on Just Published State Department Country Reports on

International Nonproliferation Regimes after the Cold War

ASSESSMENT REPORT. The Iranian Nuclear Program: a Final Agreement

Biological and Chemical Weapons. Ballistic Missiles. Chapter 2

provocation of North Korea

Foreign Policy and National Defense. Chapter 22

The Korean Peninsula situation after the UN resolution 2270 Wang Junsheng

q14 Do you consider Saudi Arabia an ally of the United States, friendly but not an ally, unfriendly, or an enemy of the United States?

Chinese Perceptions on Nuclear Weapons, Arms Control, and Nonproliferation

US-China Relations Report, Vol. 5. US-China Relations and the Korean Peninsula

Matt Phipps Dr. Patrick Donnay, Advisor

COUNCIL DECISION 2014/913/CFSP

Issue 16-04B (No. 707) March 22, THAAD 2. CHINA S CORE KOREA POLICY 3. UN SANCTIONS WHICH ONE NEXT? 5.

Grudging Partner: South Korea s Response to U.S. Security Policies. Asia-Pacific Responses to U.S. Security Policies.

Remarks by President Bill Clinton On National Missile Defense

ODUMUNC 2014 Issue Brief for Security Council. Non-proliferation and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

Section 6. South Asia

AIM: Explain the Korean War. Who/what/where/when/why

Disarmament and International Security: Nuclear Non-Proliferation

Nuclear Forces: Restore the Primacy of Deterrence

Assessing the Iran Nuclear Agreement and The Washington Institute s Iran Study Group June 24 Policy Statement

1 Nuclear Weapons. Chapter 1 Issues in the International Community. Part I Security Environment Surrounding Japan

Also this week, we celebrate the signing of the New START Treaty, which was ratified and entered into force in 2011.

During the past quarter century, Democratic People s Republic of Korea (DPRK,

The Cold War Conflicts

Opinion Poll. Small Business Owners Say Infrastructure Investments Important to their Business, Favor Robust Federal Support. September 19, 2018

NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN Steven Pifer Senior Fellow Director, Arms Control Initiative October 10, 2012

What if the Obama Administration Changes US Nuclear Policy? Potential Effects on the Strategic Nuclear War Plan

Topic 002: Nuclear Weapons Disarmament

Trump review leans toward proposing mini-nuke

North Korean Nuclear and Missile Programs and Capabilities

AMERICA S ARMY: THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION Army G-3/5/7. AS OF: August 2010 HQDA G-35 (DAMO-SSD)

US Nuclear Policy: A Mixed Message

Importance of Export Control & Japan s Export Control

The United States and the Asia-Pacific Region: National Interests and Strategic Imperatives

A/55/116. General Assembly. United Nations. General and complete disarmament: Missiles. Contents. Report of the Secretary-General

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE PROGRAM GUIDELINES. for FY 2011 and beyond

SACT s remarks to UN ambassadors and military advisors from NATO countries. New York City, 18 Apr 2018

The U.S. Rebalance to the Asia-Pacific: Development and Prospects. No. 56 November 2, 2016

Executive Summary The United States maintains a military

Extending NASA s Exemption from the Iran, North Korea, and Syria Nonproliferation Act

803 ARC Review Summary Rev

Preventing a Spillover of the Iran-Israel Conflict in Syria

Speech by Defense Minister Itsunori Onodera. Second Plenary Session. De-escalating the North Korean Crisis

United States Russia United Kingdom France China 450 Minuteman III: SS-18: 54 SS-19: 30 SS-25: 90 SS-27: 78 RS-24: 72

SIMULEX November 13-14, The Fletcher School, Tufts University. Crisis in the Western Pacific/East Asia Region

In May 2013, when I became commander of U.S. European Command

Some Reflections on Strategic Stability and its Challenges in Today s World 1

A DANGEROUS NEXUS: PREVENTING IRAN-SYRIA-NORTH KOREA NUCLEAR AND MISSILE PROLIFERATION

Policy Responses to Nuclear Threats: Nuclear Posturing After the Cold War

What is the global military situation

Unit Six: Canada Matures: Growth in the Post-War Period ( )

Ch 25-4 The Korean War

Chapter 20: Foreign and Military Policy

Table of Contents. Introduction 1. Minimum Deterrence Nonproliferation Narrative...2. Preventing Nuclear Proliferation...2

Chapter , McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved.

Overview. Section 1 Trends in the International Community. Overview

Why Japan Should Support No First Use

Transcription:

American Public Attitudes toward North Korea s Nuclear and Missile Programs Presented at a panel on Confronting North Korea s nuclear and missile programs: American and Japanese views of threats and options compared at the Brookings Institution on January 8, 2018 Shibley Telhami, Director Stella Rouse, Associate Director Survey Methodology The survey was carried out November 1-6, 2017 online from a nationally representative sample of Nielsen Scarborough s probability-based panel, originally recruited by mail and telephone using a random sample of adults provided by Survey Sampling International. The national sample was 2,000, including a down-weighted oversample of 1,042 among 18-34 year olds. Responses were weighted by age, gender, income, education, race, and geographic region using benchmarks from the US Census. The survey was also weighted by partisan identification. The margin of error is 2.19% For more information on Nielsen Scarborough s panel polling, please visit: https://criticalissues.umd.edu/sites/criticalissues.umd.edu/files/nielsen_scarborough_methodology.pdf Valuable assistance was provided by Neil Schwartz, Scott Willoth, and Shalayne Cooke from Nielsen Scarborough. Brittany Kyser, Jared McDonald, and Sean Rao were particularly helpful. Note: Percentages may not always add to one-hundred due to rounding. *The November 2017 data is from a larger University of Maryland Critical Issues Poll with Shibley Telhami and Stella Rouse as principal investigators that will be analyzed and released in the coming weeks. To view the results of these questions from The Genron NPO, please visit: http://www.genronnpo.net/world/archives/6858.html (in Japanese) 1

Q7. Please name TWO countries that you believe pose the greatest threat to world peace and security [Open-ended with text box with 2 entries] 1. North Korea 84% 75% 57% 77% 2. Russia 24 50 31 36 3. Iran 40 11 18 24 4. USA/American Leaders 3 22 15 13 5. China 14 7 17 11 6. Iraq 7 6 6 6 7. Syria 5 4 5 4 8. Afghanistan 4 2 2 3 9. Pakistan 2 2 1 2 10. Saudi Arabia 1 2 3 2 11. Middle East 2 1 2 2 12. Israel 1 2 3 2 13. Japan 1 1 2 1 14. South Korea 1 1 1 1 15. ISIS/ISIL 1 <1 1 1 16. Other 4 3 5 3 17. Refused/Don t Know 6 8 20 8 Q8. Please name TWO national or world leaders you think pose the greatest threat to world peace and security [Open-ended with text box with 2 entries] 1. Kim Jong-un 70% 59% 44% 62% 2. Vladimir Putin 26 39 27 33 3. Donald Trump 10 53 28 31 4. Iranian Leaders 20 2 7 10 5. North Korea 3 4 2 3 6. ISIS/al-Baghdadi 3 1 3 2 7. Bashar al-assad 3 1 1 2 8. Russia 1 3 <1 2 9. Hillary Clinton 3 <1 2 1 10. Xi Jinping 2 1 3 1 11. Barack Obama 2 0 0 1 12. Iran 2 1 1 1 13. China 1 1 1 1 14. Benjamin Netanyahu <1 2 <1 1 15. Angela Merkel 1 <1 1 1 16. Mike Pence <1 1 1 1 17. USA <1 <1 <1 <1 2

18. Don t dislike anyone 0 <1 <1 <1 19. All <1 <1 0 <1 20. Other 10 5 11 8 21. Refused/Don t Know 25 16 36 22 North Korea Q37. Which of the following do you believe is the most effective way to stop North Korea s nuclear program? 1. Direct talks between North Korea 7% 11% 10% 9% and the United States 2. Multi-party negotiations such as 19 51 30 35 ongoing diplomatic efforts amongst the 6 countries, North Korea, the United States, Russia, China, South Korea and Japan 3. Stricter sanctions against North Korea 10 5 5 7 4. Military action by the United States 17 5 9 11 and its allies 5. China taking a stronger stance 32 12 22 22 against North Korea 6. I don t believe North Korea s nuclear 13 16 22 15 program can be stopped Refused 1 1 3 1 Q38. Do you support or oppose the United States initiating military action against North Korea in attempt to stop its nuclear program? 1. Support 53% 15% 27% 33% 2. Oppose 22 65 42 44 3. Don t Know 25 19 29 23 Refused <1 1 2 1 3

Q39. Do you think the problem relating to North Korea s nuclear program will be resolved and, if so, when? 1. It will be resolved by the end of the year 3% 1% 1% 2% 2. It will be resolved by next year 14 4 5 8 3. It will be resolved in 5 years 16 17 12 16 4. It won t be resolved 29 37 29 33 5. Don t know 39 42 52 42 Refused <1 1 2 1 Q40. North Korea has already acquired nuclear weapons and it is anticipated that North Korea will become capable of launching missiles with nuclear warheads very soon, if it isn t already. Do you support or oppose recognizing North Korea as a nuclear-weapon state? 1. Support 36% 41% 29% 38% 2. Oppose 44 29 38 37 3. Don t Know 20 29 31 25 Refused 0 1 2 1 Q41. In response to North Korea s nuclear development, many in Northeast Asia have become increasingly supportive of previously non-nuclear Asian nations, such as South Korea and Japan, acquiring nuclear weapons. Do you support or oppose South Korea and/or Japan acquiring nuclear weapons if North Korea doesn t give up its own? Q41a. Nuclear weapons in Japan 1. Oppose 34% 46% 39% 40% 2. Support 42 26 25 33 3. Don t know 23 27 34 26 Refused 1 <1 2 1 Q41b. Nuclear weapons in South Korea 1. Oppose 35% 46% 40% 41% 2. Support 42 27 22 33 4

3. Don t know 23 26 36 26 Refused 1 1 3 1 Q42. If North Korea doesn t give up its nuclear weapons, do you support the placement of American nuclear warheads in South Korea and/or Japan? 1. Support 71% 37% 40% 52% 2. Oppose 12 29 24 21 3. Don t Know 17 33 34 27 Refused 0 1 2 <1 Q43. How do you foresee the likely outcome of the situation on the Korean Peninsula in next 10 years? 1. The instability will remain the same 27% 37% 31% 32% 2. North Korea and South Korea will have 11 12 10 11 reduced their tension and improved their relations 3. South and North will be unified 6 4 7 5 4. More instability and violence will continue 50 41 42 45 following military intervention and/or North Korea s collapse 5. Others (Please specify) 6 5 7 5 Refused 1 2 4 2 Q44. How do you think the North Korea crisis has affected Japan s relations with the United States: 1. Strengthened them 58% 29% 29% 41% 2. Weakened them 12 29 18 20 3. Had no impact 9 13 15 11 4. Don t know 22 29 36 27 Refused <1 <1 2 1 5

Q45. What level of military power should the United States maintain in Asia? 1. U.S. should maintain its current level of military 43% 56% 39% 49% power 2. U.S. should increase its level of military power 43 17 25 29 3. U.S. should decrease its level of military power 4 12 11 9 4. Don t know 9 15 24 13 Refused <1 <1 2 <1 Q46. How do you view the way President Trump has handled the North Korean nuclear issue? 1. Very unfavorably 9% 72% 36% 41% 2. Somewhat unfavorably 14 20 25 18 3. Somewhat favorably 45 6 26 25 4. Very favorably 31 2 9 15 Refused 1 1 4 1 Q47. Which of the following is closer to your view: 1. North Korea s nuclear arms buildup is mostly 12% 15% 21% 15% driven by insecurity and need to deter the United States and its allies 2. North Korea s nuclear program is mostly 30 22 22 25 driven by ambition/aggression 3. North Korea s nuclear program is mostly 7 17 15 12 driven by the desire to be fully recognized as a legitimate country and as a member of the international community 4. North Korea s nuclear program is mostly 50 44 38 46 driven by the need to maintain the current regime and its power Refused 1 3 4 2 6

Q48. As a multilateral security framework for Northeast Asian security, which of the following alliances would be the most effective? 1. China-Japan-South Korea 9% 8% 8% 8% 2. U.S.-China-Japan 4 6 5 5 3. U.S.-China-Russia 7 5 5 6 4. U.S.-China-Japan-South Korea 26 28 14 26 5. U.S.-China-Japan-South Korea-Russia 37 34 36 35 6. Other (please specify) 3 1 4 2 7. Don t know 14 18 27 17 Refused 1 1 1 1 7