Home care clients with complex needs who received personal support service within five days

Similar documents
Deaths by care setting

Hospitalizations for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSC)

Indicator description

HOSPITAL SERVICE ACCOUNTABILITY AGREEMENT: Indicator Technical Specifications

Hospital Service Accountability Agreement. Indicator Technical Specifications

Looking Back and Looking Forward. A Sneak Peek for the 2018/19 Home Care quality improvement plans (QIPs)

Waterloo Wellington Community Care Access Centre. Community Needs Assessment

Hospital Service Accountability Agreement. Indicator Technical Specifications

Health human resources forecasting: Understanding the current and future requirements of PSW s and nurses in Ontario s LTC sector

HOSPICE QUALITY REPORTING PROGRAM

AFP Fundraising Day 2018 Tuesday June 12, 2018 Metro Toronto Convention Centre, North Building

Management Report to the MH LHIN Board of Directors April/May, 2011

Assessing Value in Ontario Health Links. Part 3: Measures of System Performance in Ontario s Health Links

COMMITTEE REPORTS TO THE BOARD

Current Performance as stated on QIP14/15

ehealth Report for Ed Clark November 10, 2016 My Background and Context:

Health Quality Ontario

Mississauga Halton Local Health Integration Network (LHIN) Francophone Community Consultation - May 9, 2009

2014/2015 Mississauga Halton CCAC Quality Improvement Plan

Excellent Care for All Quality Improvement Plans (QIP): Progress Report for 2016/17 QIP

What does the Patients First Act mean for Rural Communities?

Service Accountability Agreements Update

M-SAA MONITORING, ASSESSMENT PROCESS & OVERVIEW 2010/11 YE

A View from a LHIN Breakfast with the Chiefs

2015 Ontario Hospitals Maternal-Child Services Report LHIN-level Indicators

About the Data: Adult Health and Disease - Chronic Illness 2016/17, 2014/15 (archived) Last Updated: August 29, 2018

Towards a Common Quality Agenda Measuring Up. Technical Appendix

French Language Services Alzheimer Society of Peel

3.01. CCACs Community Care Access Centres Home Care Program. Chapter 3 Section. Overall Conclusion

Part I: A History and Overview of the OACCAC s ehealth Assets

MSAA AMENDING AGREEMENT. THIS AMENDING AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is made as of the 1 st day of April, 2017

Health System Funding Reform

Community Accountability Planning Submission (CAPS) Health Service Providers Orientation Session

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Ontario

Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings

PERSONAL SUPPORT SERVICES WAGE ENHANCEMENT Questions and Answers

LHIN Regional Summaries 2016

Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings

MaRS 2017 Venture Client Annual Survey - Methodology

2017/18 Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) Narrative for Health Care Organizations in Ontario

Periodic Health Examinations: A Rapid Economic Analysis

2016/17 Quality Improvement Plan "Improvement Targets and Initiatives"

CENTRAL EAST LHIN MLPA PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DASHBOARD Performance effective as of August 2011

Improving Quality at Toronto Central LHIN. 2012/13 Year in Review

TC LHIN Quality Indicators: Big Dot (System) and Small Dot (Sector Specific) Indicators. November 29, 2013

Toronto Central LHIN 2016/2017 QIP Snapshot Report. Health Quality Ontario The provincial advisor on the quality of health care in Ontario

Sub-region Geography Data Analysis

Sub-region Geography Data Analysis

Understanding and Identifying Target Populations for Integrated Care

Multi-Sector Service Accountability Agreements (M-SAA)

2016 Ontario Hospitals Maternal-Child Services Report LHIN-level Indicators

Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) Narrative for Health Care Organizations in Ontario

Model of Health and Wellbeing Evaluation Framework & Data Entry Manual. Presented by: CHC Regional Decision Support June 2015

Mississauga Halton Local Health Integration Network

Quality, Risk and Patient Safety Report Fiscal Year , Third Quarter Submitted to: Board of Directors March 3, 2017

The Francophone Population

The South West Regional Wound Care Program (SWRWCP): A Collaborative Approach to Wound Care

College of Nurses of Ontario. Membership Statistics Report 2017

Ontario s Diagnostic Imaging Appropriateness Pilot Project

LHIN Regional Summaries 2016

Community Health and Hospital Services Integration Planning Process DRAFT Integrated Service Delivery Model for Northumberland County December 2013

Using the Hospice PEPPER to Support Auditing and Monitoring Efforts: Session 1

Ontario Mental Health Reporting System

COMMUNITY ACCOUNTABILITY PLANNING SUBMISSIONS (CAPS) & MULTI-SECTOR SERVICE ACCOUNTABILITY AGREEMENTS (MSAA) Educational Materials

Sub-region Geography Data Analysis

Primary Care Measures at the Sub-Region Level

Quality Improvement From the Ground Up : The Co-Design Model in Action

Supporting Best Practice for COPD Care Across the System

March 24, Ms. Angela Robertson Executive Director Central Toronto Community Health Centres 168 Bathurst Street Toronto, ON M5V 2R4

Quality, Risk and Patient Safety Report Fiscal Year , Fourth Quarter

Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) Narrative for Health Care Organizations in Ontario

Methodology Notes. Cost of a Standard Hospital Stay: Appendices to Indicator Library

2009/2010 Benchmarking Comparison of Canadian Hospitals

Transforming Health Care For Seniors in the Mississauga Halton LHIN Right care, right time, right setting, right cost

ENGAGE. ALIGN. INFLUENCE:

How BC s Health System Matrix Project Met the Challenges of Health Data

January 29, Andria Spindel President / Chief Executive Officer March of Dimes Canada 6 Glenwood Place Unit 6 Brockville, ON, K6V 2T3

Children s Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Changes to Managed Entry

Planning for a Schedule Refresh Community Accountability Planning Submission. Multi-Sector Service Accountability Agreement Schedule Refresh Content

Regional Hospice Palliative Care Model Action Plan

Recent Trends Among Ontario Long Stay Home Care Patients and Long Term Care Residents

NHS WALES INFORMATICS SERVICE DATA QUALITY STATUS REPORT ADMITTED PATIENT CARE DATA SET

Health Quality Ontario

Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) Narrative for Health Care Organizations in Ontario

Excellent Care for All Quality Improvement Plans (QIP): Progress Report for the 2015/16 QIP

Using the New Home Health Agency (HHA) PEPPER to Support Auditing and Monitoring Efforts

MH LHIN Palliative Care Initiative. Dr. Robert Sauls September 2010

4.10. Ontario Research Fund. Chapter 4 Section. Background. Follow-up on VFM Section 3.10, 2009 Annual Report. The Ministry of Research and Innovation

NHS WALES INFORMATICS SERVICE DATA QUALITY STATUS REPORT ADMITTED PATIENT CARE DATA SET

Medicaid Hospital Incentive Payments Calculations

ConnectingGTA Overview. April 29, 2014

Nursing Practice In Rural and Remote Ontario: An Analysis of CIHI s Nursing Database

ClinicalConnect Base Funding Allocation

Key Highlights

Accreditation Report

Indicator Specification:

CKHA Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) Scorecard

Caregiver Respite Program: An Organizational strategy to support Caregivers' Unique Needs

Strategic Plan

Transcription:

Home care clients with complex needs who received personal support service within five days Resource for Indicator Standards (RIS) Health Analytics Branch, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Indicator description RIS indicator name Home care clients with complex needs who received personal support service within five days Other names for this indicator Percentage of clients with complex needs who received in-home personal support service within the five day target Percentage of home care clients with complex needs who received their personal support visit within 5 days of the date that they were authorized for personal support services 5 day wait time Personal support for complex patients 5 day wait time for home care: Personal support for complex patients Indicator description Percentage of clients with complex needs who received in-home personal support service within the five day target. The indicator calculation is the number of clients with complex needs who received personal support service within five days divided by total number of clients with complex needs who received personal support service multiplied by 100. Accountability agreement(s) or ministry initiative(s) the indicator supports Ministry LHIN Accountability Agreement (MLAA), 2015 2018 Multi-Sector Service Accountability Agreement (MSAA), 2017 2018 The Quarterly Quality Improvement Plan (home care)

Numerator Data source Home Care Database (HCD), Ontario Association of Community Care Access Centres (OACCAC) Inclusion/exclusion criteria Includes: 1. Clients received CCAC in-home personal support service within 5 days from service authorization; 2. Same list of criteria listed in the denominator section. Excludes: 1. Same list of criteria as for the denominator. Calculation Steps: 1. Calculate wait time as First Service Date Start Date (Start service authorization date for each episode of care). Denominator Data source Home Care Database (HCD), Ontario Association of Community Care Access Centres (OACCAC) Inclusion/exclusion criteria Includes: 1. Clients requested in-home program at the time of referral (Request Program = 1); 2. Clients received in-home service (SRC = 91 to 95); 3. Clients received personal support services (Service Type = 11, 12, 13, 15); 4. Age at service authorization date is greater than 18. Excludes: 1. Children receiving personal support services (Age <= 18); 2. Service delivered in school setting (Care Site = 12, 24, 25); 3. Episodes of care where service on hold date falls between the service authorization date and first service date. 2

Calculation Steps: 1. Prepare an episode of care file: a. Restrict service authorization file to personal support services (Service Type = 11, 12, 13, 15); b. Assign Care Authorization Date as Start Date and Care Discharge Date as End Date; open cases are assigned to future date of 1JAN2099 d; c. Consolidate overlapping service authorization records to create distinct episodes of care. 2. Link each episode of care to service table using the following logic: a. Intake ID = Intake ID; b. Service Type is Personal support services (11, 12, 13, 15); c. Service Date is BETWEEN Episode of care Start Date and End Date; d. Output first service record for each episode of care. 3. Define cohort: a. Clients received in-home service (SRC = 91 to 95); b. Service is delivered in in-home setting (Care Site NOT equal to 12, 24, 25); c. Age at Start Date of episode of care is greater than 18; d. Clients with complex needs (Authorization Client Care Model (CCM) Population =1). For each episode of care record, if the CCM is missing from the first consolidated record the last consolidated record CCM is used. 4. Remove service On-Hold clients: a. Link cohort to On Hold table using IDS Client ID; b. Remove all episodes of care where On Hold dates fall between the service authorization and first service date. 5. Calculate percent of clients within 5 day wait time target as total number of CCAC clients with complex needs receiving in-home personal support services within 0 to 5 days from service authorization in a given time period divided by total number of CCAC clients with complex needs receiving in-home personal support services in a given time period) multiplied by 100. Timing and geography Timing/frequency of release How often and when data are being released (e.g., be as specific as possible data are released annually in mid-may) Data by fiscal year are available annually. Trending Years available for trending Data for this indicator are available from 2013/14 Q1 as this is when the CCM became mandatory. The service authorization date is only available from 2012/13 onward. 3

Levels of comparability Levels of geography for comparison Data are available at LHIN level. Additional information Limitations Specific limitations The coding of CCM population was rolled out over time with a target completion date of Q2 2012/13. The majority of CCACs are using CCM for planning, program design and implementation, and reporting, except for Toronto Central CCAC whose roll out is still in progress. Therefore, analyses by CCM population are available starting in 2013/14. For many clients, home care assessments occur over a period of time, rather than on a single date. A number of possible dates could be used to measure assessment, including the date of the initial assessment, which begins the assessment stage, or the service authorization date, which is the logical outcome and conclusion of the assessment stage. The Home Care Wait Time Implementation Task Group recommended the use of service authorization date. Using service authorization date for wait time analysis includes three different client populations: (1) new clients; (2) existing clients who now require a new service, and; (3) existing clients who are receiving services after a break in service. Each client population is considered a unique episode of care. Clients may have multiple episodes of care as they transition across the health care system. The first personal support service post each episode of care is included. As of Q2 2013/14, most CCACs, except for Central West and Mississauga Halton CCACs, report respite as a part of personal support services, rather than as a separate service. Therefore, respite services (Service Type = 15) are included as personal support services in the analyses. Comments Additional information regarding the calculation, interpretation, data source, etc. N/A References Provide URLs of any key references (e.g., Diabetes in Canada, http:// ) N/A Contact information For more information about this indicator, please contact RIS@ontario.ca. 4

Date RIS document created (YYYY-MM-DD) 2015-09-16 Date last reviewed (YYYY-MM-DD) 2017-07-17 5