NPT/CONF.2015/PC.I/WP.12*

Similar documents
UNIDIR RESOURCES IDEAS FOR PEACE AND SECURITY. Practical Steps towards Transparency of Nuclear Arsenals January Introduction

Expanding Nuclear Weapons State Transparency to Strengthen Nonproliferation

Report of the Disarmament Commission

Physics 280: Session 29

Achieving the Vision of a World Free of Nuclear Weapons International Conference on Nuclear Disarmament, Oslo February

COMMUNICATION OF 14 MARCH 2000 RECEIVED FROM THE PERMANENT MISSION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY

NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT POLICY BEYOND THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

The present addendum brings up to date document A/C.1/56/INF/1/Add.1 and incorporates documents issued as at 29 October 2001.

Arms Control and Proliferation Profile: The United Kingdom

Grading Progress on 13 Steps Toward Disarmament

NATO's Nuclear Forces in the New Security Environment

Question of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and of weapons of mass destruction MUNISH 11

Nuclear Disarmament Weapons Stockpiles

Th. d.,."""~,,.,,,,",~ awolaaily." "1119'" l"'lid!q.one_'i~fie",_ ~qf 1"'/ll'll'_1)I"wa,

Negotiations relating to a fissile material cut-off

The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going forward

Verifying Nuclear Disarmament

UNITED STATES AND INDIA NUCLEAR COOPERATION

Note verbale dated 3 November 2004 from the Permanent Mission of Kazakhstan to the United Nations addressed to the Chairman of the Committee

Assessing Progress on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament

THE NUCLEAR WORLD IN THE EARLY 21 ST CENTURY

US-Russian Nuclear Disarmament: Current Record and Possible Further Steps 1. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov

Report of the United States of America. Pursuant to Actions 5, 20, and 21. of the NPT Review Conference Final Document

NMMSS, Nuclear Archaeology, and the Verification of Nuclear Disarmament

Policy Responses to Nuclear Threats: Nuclear Posturing After the Cold War

CONCLUDING ACT OF THE NEGOTIATION ON PERSONNEL STRENGTH OF CONVENTIONAL ARMED FORCES IN EUROPE

APPENDIX 1. Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty A chronology

A/CONF.229/2017/NGO/WP.2

OPNAVINST G N514 8 Jan Subj: RELEASE OF INFORMATION ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND ON NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES OF U.S. NAVY FORCES

TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS ON THE LIMITATION OF ANTI-BALLISTIC MISSILE SYSTEMS

Nuclear Disarmament: Weapons Stockpiles

NOTE BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL PROGRESS IN THE ELIMINATION OF THE SYRIAN CHEMICAL WEAPONS PROGRAMME

The Nuclear Powers and Disarmament Prospects and Possibilities 1. William F. Burns

Transparency and accountability

Implementation of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. in the People s Republic of China

2017 Washington Model Organization of American States General Assembly. Crisis Scenario Resolution. General Committee

Governance and Decision-making Process: CTBTO Experience

ICAN s five steps to denuclearise the Korean peninsula

NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN Steven Pifer Senior Fellow Director, Arms Control Initiative October 10, 2012

UNIDIR RESOURCES IDEAS FOR PEACE AND SECURITY. Transparency in Nuclear Disarmament. March Transparency in Nuclear Disarmament

Welcoming the restoration to Kuwait of its sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity and the return of its legitimate Government.

Historical Timeline of Major Nuclear Events

ASSESSMENT REPORT. The Iranian Nuclear Program: a Final Agreement

Uninventing the Bomb?

K Security Assurances

Iran and the NPT SUMMARY

Also this week, we celebrate the signing of the New START Treaty, which was ratified and entered into force in 2011.

Statement and Recommendations of the Co-Chairs of the 3 rd Panel on Peace and Security of Northeast Asia (PSNA) Workshop

US Nuclear Policy: A Mixed Message

Assessing Progress on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament

The United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, hereinafter referred to as the Parties,

Differences Between House and Senate FY 2019 NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

L Security Assurances

Africa & nuclear weapons. An introduction to the issue of nuclear weapons in Africa

During the Cold War, both the United States and the Soviet

General Assembly First Committee. Topic A: Nuclear Non-Proliferation in the Middle East

A/56/136. General Assembly. United Nations. Missiles. Contents. Report of the Secretary-General

COUNCIL DECISION 2014/913/CFSP

Nuclear arms control is at a crossroads. The old regime has been assaulted

CONSORTIUM FOR VERIFICATION TECHNOLOGY

1 Nuclear Weapons. Chapter 1 Issues in the International Community. Part I Security Environment Surrounding Japan

AMERICA S ARMY: THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION Army G-3/5/7. AS OF: August 2010 HQDA G-35 (DAMO-SSD)

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY REPORTING TEMPLATE

Nuclear Terrorism: Threat Briefing How Serious is the Threat?

2. NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND FISSILE MATERIALS: A BRIEF OVERVIEW

Disarmament and International Security: Nuclear Non-Proliferation

Lithtuania s International Obligations in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Field

The Safeguards System of the International Atomic Energy Agency

Iran s Nuclear Program: Tehran s Compliance with International Obligations

OLINSQWf^fJaRARY PHOTOCOPY

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY REPORTING TEMPLATE

1

SALT I TEXT. The United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, hereinafter referred to as the Parties,

Security Council. United Nations S/RES/1718 (2006) Resolution 1718 (2006) Adopted by the Security Council at its 5551st meeting, on 14 October 2006

HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE-4. Subject: National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction

Priorities in Nuclear Arms Control and Non-Proliferation: Comparing Approaches of Russia and the West. Moscow, Russia, April 2007

Adopted by the Security Council at its 5710th meeting, on 29 June 2007

Montessori Model United Nations. First Committee Disarmament and International Security

Modern Arms Control Challenges

NOTE BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL PROGRESS IN THE ELIMINATION OF THE SYRIAN CHEMICAL WEAPONS PROGRAMME

This Protocol is organized into ten Parts.

National report of the Russian Federation. for the 2015 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty

V. Chinese nuclear forces

1. INSPECTIONS AND VERIFICATION Inspectors must be permitted unimpeded access to suspect sites.

Verification and the International Atomic Energy Agency.

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY REPORTING TEMPLATE

ABM Treaty and Related Documents

A Nuclear Weapons Free Future: A New Basis of Hope

Founding Documents. Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies PUBLIC DOCUMENTS.

Seo-Hang Lee, Ph. D. President, Korea Institute for Maritime Strategy Professor Emeritus, KNDA

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Analysis of Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Bill: HR Differences Between House and Senate NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

Future Directions in Nuclear Arms Control and Verification

Overview of Safeguards, Security, and Treaty Verification

Cooperative Threat Reduction

A/55/116. General Assembly. United Nations. General and complete disarmament: Missiles. Contents. Report of the Secretary-General

NOTE BY THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL PROGRESS IN THE ELIMINATION OF THE SYRIAN CHEMICAL WEAPONS PROGRAMME

Legal and Regulatory Framework of Nuclear Security in Indonesia

Nuclear Weapons Status and Options Under a START Follow-On Agreement

Major Proposals to Strengthen the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty

Transcription:

Preparatory Committee for the 2015 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons * 20 April 2012 Original: English First session Vienna, 30 April-11 May 2012 Transparency of nuclear weapons: the Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Initiative Working paper submitted by Australia, Canada, Chile, Germany, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Poland, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates 1. Increased transparency of information related to nuclear weapons is an important precondition for further progress in nuclear disarmament and verification. This notion was reflected in the 13 practical steps for the systematic and progressive efforts to achieve complete disarmament adopted by the 2000 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (see NPT/CONF.2000/28 (Parts I and II)). In step 9 (b), the Review Conference called for increased transparency by the nuclear-weapon States with regard to the nuclear weapons capabilities and the implementation of agreements pursuant to article VI and as a voluntary confidence-building measure to support further progress on nuclear disarmament, and, in step 12, the States parties committed themselves to reporting regularly on the implementation of article VI of the Treaty. 2. In its Final Document (see NPT/CONF.2010/50 (Vol. I)), the 2010 Review Conference recognized that nuclear disarmament and achieving the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons would require openness and cooperation, and affirmed the importance of enhanced confidence through increased transparency and effective verification. Action 5 (g) of the action plan adopted by consensus by the Conference called upon the nuclear-weapon States to further enhance transparency and increase mutual confidence, and action 21 encouraged them to agree as soon as possible on a standard reporting form and to determine appropriate reporting intervals for the purpose of voluntarily providing standard information without prejudice to national security. 3. The Review Conference noted the increased transparency of some nuclearweapon States with regard to the number of nuclear weapons in their national inventories. Their contributions, and the entry into force of the Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, on 5 February 2011, must be * Reissued for technical reasons on 7 May 2012. 12-30401* (E) 070512 *1230401*

welcomed. There is, however, a greater need for and expectation of more detailed information related to nuclear weapons by all nuclear-weapon States. This holds especially true with regard to non-strategic nuclear weapons, which to date have not formed part of arms control and disarmament processes. Additional information would be seen not only as an important security and confidence-building measure, but would also facilitate further progress in nuclear disarmament. 4. The Review Conference called upon the nuclear-weapon States to report on their nuclear disarmament undertakings to the Preparatory Committee in 2014. Action 21 provides a framework in that regard by introducing the idea of a standard reporting form. In this context, efforts by the nuclear-weapon States to coordinate the implementation of their commitments under the action plan are welcomed. In support of that process, the members of the Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Initiative, which are non-nuclear-weapon States, proposed a draft standard nuclear disarmament reporting form, which was shared with the nuclear-weapon States in June 2011. The draft form is set out in the annex to the present working paper. 5. For the purpose of the 2015 review cycle, we would like to restate our expectations with regard to greater transparency of information related to nuclear weapons, which might be taken into consideration by the nuclear-weapon States. First, the standard reporting form might include, without prejudice to the national security of the nuclear-weapon States, information on: (a) The number, types (strategic or non-strategic) and status (deployed or non-deployed) of nuclear warheads; (b) The number and, if possible, types of delivery vehicles; (c) The number and types of weapons and delivery systems dismantled and reduced as part of nuclear disarmament efforts; (d) The amount of fissile material produced for military purposes; (e) The measures taken to diminish the role and significance of nuclear weapons in military and security concepts, doctrines and policies. 6. The elements suggested above are included in the draft reporting form. The draft form is, however, indicative and thus neither exhaustive nor definitive. For example, in the final form agreed upon by the nuclear-weapon States, standardized reporting might also include national budgets and other resources devoted to the maintenance of nuclear arsenals. Other States parties, nuclear-weapon States and non-nuclear-weapon States alike, may well have additional views on the elements of the form. 7. Second, although action 5 of the action plan calls upon the nuclear-weapon States to report on nuclear disarmament undertakings to the Preparatory Committee in 2014, we encourage them to consider voluntarily presenting preliminary reports, subject to future updates, at each session of the Preparatory Committee. 8. Third, to facilitate transparency and information exchange, we encourage the nuclear-weapon States to continue discussions on definitions and terminology related to nuclear weapons. 9. Lastly, we encourage all States parties, including non-nuclear-weapon States, to submit regular reports on the implementation of the 2010 action plan and other relevant documents, in accordance with action 20. 2 12-30401

Annex Draft standard nuclear disarmament reporting form: [name of country], 20xx At the 2010 Review Conference, the States parties adopted an unprecedented set of actions pertaining to the three pillars of the Treaty. Of particular significance was action 21, in which, as a confidence-building measure, all the nuclear-weapon States were encouraged to agree as soon as possible on a standard reporting form and to determine appropriate reporting intervals for the purpose of voluntarily providing standard information without prejudice to national security. The present draft reporting form seeks to provide exploratory input into the process of specifying and developing a standard reporting form for the meeting of the five permanent members of the Security Council in Paris. This exercise seeks to provide a possible standard form for reporting on some of the most critical information, so as to enhance transparency regarding the efforts of the nuclear-weapon States in relation to nuclear disarmament, as mentioned, in particular, in actions 3 and 5 (a) of the action plan. In that action plan, the nuclear-weapon States also committed themselves to a wide range of other disarmament measures, and their efforts in relation to those measures should also be reported. The present draft form contains possible elements in that regard. Under this proposal, the nuclear-weapon States are expected to report on their efforts at each session of the Preparatory Committee. Although action 5 calls upon them to report those undertakings to the Preparatory Committee in 2014, nothing prevents them from presenting such a report, albeit in a preliminary form, at each session of the Preparatory Committee held before 2014. 12-30401 3

4 12-30401 Nuclear warheads Total number of nuclear warheads a Aggregate number of nuclear warheads in stockpile b Number of strategic or non-strategic nuclear warheads Number of strategic or non-strategic deployed nuclear warheads Number of strategic or non-strategic non-deployed nuclear warheads Reductions (in numbers) of nuclear warheads in 20xx Aggregate number of nuclear warheads dismantled in 20xx Delivery vehicles Number of nuclear warhead delivery systems by type (missiles, aircraft, submarines, artillery, other) Strategic Non-strategic Strategic Non-strategic Strategic Non-strategic Deployed: Non-deployed: a This refers to all the nuclear warheads that exist in or are under the control of the reporting State, including those awaiting dismantlement. b This refers to nuclear warheads in service, deployed and reserved for active duty.

12-30401 5 Reduction (in numbers) of delivery systems in 20xx Aggregate number of delivery systems dismantled in 20xx Nuclear disarmament since 1995 c 1995-2000 2000-2005 2005-2010 Nuclear doctrine Measures taken or in process to diminish the role and significance of nuclear weapons in military and security concepts, doctrines and policies Measures taken or in process to reduce the operational readiness of the reporting State s nuclear arsenal Measures taken or in process to reduce the risk of accidental or unauthorized use of nuclear weapons c This item allows the nuclear-weapon States to demonstrate their disarmament efforts since the 1995 Extension and Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, at which a major set of nuclear disarmament steps was agreed to in exchange for the Treaty s indefinite extension. As mentioned in action 21, reporting will take place without prejudice to national security. The nuclear-weapon States are nevertheless highly encouraged to report on the above items to the extent possible.

6 12-30401 Description of negative security assurances (including status and definition) by reporting States Current status and future prospect of the ratification of the relevant protocols to nuclear-weapon-free-zone treaties Current status of consultations and cooperation on entry into force of the relevant protocols of nuclear-weapon-free-zone treaties Current status of review of any related reservations about the relevant protocols of nuclear-weapon-free-zone treaties by concerned States Nuclear testing Current status of ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Current status of the reporting State s policy on continued adherence to the moratorium on nuclear-weapon test explosions Activities to promote the entry into force of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty at the national, regional and global levels Scheduled policy reviews Scope and focus of policy reviews, scheduled or under way, relating to nuclear weapon stocks, nuclear doctrine or nuclear posture

12-30401 7 Fissile material Aggregate amount of plutonium produced for national security purposes (in metric tons) Aggregate amount of highly enriched uranium produced for national security purposes (in metric tons) Amount of fissile material d declared excess for national security purposes (in metric tons) Current status (and any future plan), including the amount and year, of declarations to the International Atomic Energy Agency of all fissile material designated by the reporting State as no longer required for military purposes and placement of such material under Agency or other relevant international verification and arrangements for the disposition of such material for peaceful purposes Current status of the development of appropriate legally binding verification arrangements to ensure the irreversible removal of such fissile material Current status (and any future plan) of the dismantlement or conversion for peaceful uses of facilities for the production of fissile material for use in nuclear weapons Other measures in support of nuclear disarmament Any cooperation among Governments, the United Nations and civil society aimed at increasing confidence, improving transparency and developing efficient verification capabilities d For all instances of its use in the present reporting form, the term fissile material is defined as highly enriched uranium (enriched to 20 per cent uranium-235 or greater); or separated weapons-grade plutonium (Pu), uranium-233 (U-233), neptunium (Np) or americium (Am).

8 12-30401 Year and official document symbol of regular reports on the implementation of Article VI, paragraph 4 (c), of the 1995 decision entitled Principles and objectives for nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament, and the practical steps agreed to in the Final Document of the 2000 Review Conference Activities to promote disarmament and non-proliferation education